Why did Robert pick unworthy men for the White Cloaks?What happened to Ice, Eddard Stark's Valyrian steel sword?Who are the 3 men who would have a chance against Jaime Lannister in a sword fight?Why did Stannis join the rebellion?Have the requirements for knighthood changed over time?How did Renly expect Robert to set aside Cersei and take Margaery as queen instead?Why did Stannis keep the title of Prince of Dragonstone after Joffrey was born?Who destroyed the Sept in Lordsport, Iron Islands?Did Arthur Dayne give Dawn to the Smiling Knight?Was Jon Arryn capable as the Hand? What were his achievements?Why are members of the Kingsguard allowed to fight in battles and tourneys?

Definition of 'vrit'

If the mass of the Earth is decreasing by sending debris in space, does its angular momentum also decrease?

Are there examples of rowers who also fought?

"Prove that ∂A is closed given ∂A = Cl(A) − Int(A)"

How can I ping multiple IP addresses at the same time?

'No arbitrary choices' intuition for natural transformation.

How do you transpose samples in cents?

King or Queen-Which piece is which?

I found a password with hashcat but it doesn't work

Is there any possible way to get these hearts as Adult Link?

How is the idea of "girlfriend material" naturally expressed in Russian?

Draw a symmetric alien head

"Correct me if I'm wrong"

What does it cost to buy a tavern?

Are intrusions within a foreign embassy considered an act of war?

"What is the maximum that Player 1 can win?"

How do I find which software is doing an SSH connection?

Slow Performance When Changing Object Data [2.8]

Is declining an undergraduate award which causes me discomfort appropriate?

Predict the product from the reaction

Understanding “en comprend”

Make symbols atomic, without losing their type

Time at 1 g acceleration to travel 100 000 light years

Would a 7805 5 V regulator drain a 9 V battery?



Why did Robert pick unworthy men for the White Cloaks?


What happened to Ice, Eddard Stark's Valyrian steel sword?Who are the 3 men who would have a chance against Jaime Lannister in a sword fight?Why did Stannis join the rebellion?Have the requirements for knighthood changed over time?How did Renly expect Robert to set aside Cersei and take Margaery as queen instead?Why did Stannis keep the title of Prince of Dragonstone after Joffrey was born?Who destroyed the Sept in Lordsport, Iron Islands?Did Arthur Dayne give Dawn to the Smiling Knight?Was Jon Arryn capable as the Hand? What were his achievements?Why are members of the Kingsguard allowed to fight in battles and tourneys?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








28















When we look at past examples, Kingsguards' history for most part has been illustrious and a shining example of chivalry and honour. There have been rare exceptions every two or three decades or so but that doesn't match up to what happened in Robert's reign.



Robert's Seven could perhaps be called the worst seven ever assembled in the history. Even staunch Baratheon loyalists like Eddard Stark agreed on that much. When we look at the 7:



  1. Ser Barristan Selmy - Although famous in the seven Kingdoms for his honour, Selmy had indeed dishonoured himself by taking Robert's pardon rather than dying for Targaryens like his sworn brothers did. As his Lord Commander and comrades said, "Our knees don't bend easy [....] Kingsguards do not flee [...] We swore an oath". Yet Selmy didn't follow them in their example even though he was arguably made of the same stuff; True Steel.

  2. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.

  3. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil. And then we see how he sold Princess Myrcella to Dornish serpants for some sweet nothings whispered in his ear in a fashion that would have enraged old Ser Gerold Hightower or Prince Aemon the Dragonknight.

  4. Ser Boros Blount - A well known coward with little to no martial skills who was dishonourable beside. Even Ser Arys didn't shame himself as much as Boros did in his yielding of Prince Tommen.

  5. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable as we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.

  6. Ser Meryn Trant - A cruel, dishonourable man who was a stain on the White Cloak he wore.

  7. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but characterwise he was not much different from other paragons such as Blount, Moore and Trant.

Among the seven, the only real steel were the two surviving member of Aerys II's seven. The five that Robert himself chose were singularly unsuited for the job. How did Robert have such a knack for picking the worst possible aspiring white cloaks? Is there any background information or author's comments available on those appointment?










share|improve this question

















  • 48





    I don't have enough for an answer at the moment, but I wonder if it is less related to the character of the current Kingsguard and more related to us not seeing the flaws in prior Kingsguards. Basically the "good old days" weren't actually as good as they seem. This would be consistent with GRRM's style of gray characters vs black and white characters. For example, Aerys' Kingsguard watched him burn people alive. Who knows what atrocities they accomplished in his name.

    – kuhl
    Jun 10 at 17:30







  • 26





    Also, for #1, can't really blame Selmy on that front. He fought until he was in critical condition, Robert sent his own healer to save him, and then offered him the pardon after the Targaryens were dead. It's not like Selmy chose not to die fighting for his King, he just didn't really have a choice to make until after his King was dead and Robert was the new King.

    – DariM
    Jun 10 at 21:40






  • 4





    @kuhl: Exactly! The reputation of prior Kingsguard is surely as much propaganda and legend as fact.

    – Jack Aidley
    Jun 11 at 13:43











  • The knock against several of these is, basically, “Dishonored himself by betraying his King and accepting a pardon from Robert Baratheon.” When Robert Baratheon is usurping the throne and handing out offices, that’s kind of baked into the cake.

    – Davislor
    Jun 11 at 23:52







  • 2





    If you read the books it's very clear that GRRM tries to portray Robert as a very poor judge of character. It even leads to his demise. The writing is all very heavy handed.

    – Darth Egregious
    Jun 12 at 19:09

















28















When we look at past examples, Kingsguards' history for most part has been illustrious and a shining example of chivalry and honour. There have been rare exceptions every two or three decades or so but that doesn't match up to what happened in Robert's reign.



Robert's Seven could perhaps be called the worst seven ever assembled in the history. Even staunch Baratheon loyalists like Eddard Stark agreed on that much. When we look at the 7:



  1. Ser Barristan Selmy - Although famous in the seven Kingdoms for his honour, Selmy had indeed dishonoured himself by taking Robert's pardon rather than dying for Targaryens like his sworn brothers did. As his Lord Commander and comrades said, "Our knees don't bend easy [....] Kingsguards do not flee [...] We swore an oath". Yet Selmy didn't follow them in their example even though he was arguably made of the same stuff; True Steel.

  2. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.

  3. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil. And then we see how he sold Princess Myrcella to Dornish serpants for some sweet nothings whispered in his ear in a fashion that would have enraged old Ser Gerold Hightower or Prince Aemon the Dragonknight.

  4. Ser Boros Blount - A well known coward with little to no martial skills who was dishonourable beside. Even Ser Arys didn't shame himself as much as Boros did in his yielding of Prince Tommen.

  5. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable as we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.

  6. Ser Meryn Trant - A cruel, dishonourable man who was a stain on the White Cloak he wore.

  7. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but characterwise he was not much different from other paragons such as Blount, Moore and Trant.

Among the seven, the only real steel were the two surviving member of Aerys II's seven. The five that Robert himself chose were singularly unsuited for the job. How did Robert have such a knack for picking the worst possible aspiring white cloaks? Is there any background information or author's comments available on those appointment?










share|improve this question

















  • 48





    I don't have enough for an answer at the moment, but I wonder if it is less related to the character of the current Kingsguard and more related to us not seeing the flaws in prior Kingsguards. Basically the "good old days" weren't actually as good as they seem. This would be consistent with GRRM's style of gray characters vs black and white characters. For example, Aerys' Kingsguard watched him burn people alive. Who knows what atrocities they accomplished in his name.

    – kuhl
    Jun 10 at 17:30







  • 26





    Also, for #1, can't really blame Selmy on that front. He fought until he was in critical condition, Robert sent his own healer to save him, and then offered him the pardon after the Targaryens were dead. It's not like Selmy chose not to die fighting for his King, he just didn't really have a choice to make until after his King was dead and Robert was the new King.

    – DariM
    Jun 10 at 21:40






  • 4





    @kuhl: Exactly! The reputation of prior Kingsguard is surely as much propaganda and legend as fact.

    – Jack Aidley
    Jun 11 at 13:43











  • The knock against several of these is, basically, “Dishonored himself by betraying his King and accepting a pardon from Robert Baratheon.” When Robert Baratheon is usurping the throne and handing out offices, that’s kind of baked into the cake.

    – Davislor
    Jun 11 at 23:52







  • 2





    If you read the books it's very clear that GRRM tries to portray Robert as a very poor judge of character. It even leads to his demise. The writing is all very heavy handed.

    – Darth Egregious
    Jun 12 at 19:09













28












28








28


1






When we look at past examples, Kingsguards' history for most part has been illustrious and a shining example of chivalry and honour. There have been rare exceptions every two or three decades or so but that doesn't match up to what happened in Robert's reign.



Robert's Seven could perhaps be called the worst seven ever assembled in the history. Even staunch Baratheon loyalists like Eddard Stark agreed on that much. When we look at the 7:



  1. Ser Barristan Selmy - Although famous in the seven Kingdoms for his honour, Selmy had indeed dishonoured himself by taking Robert's pardon rather than dying for Targaryens like his sworn brothers did. As his Lord Commander and comrades said, "Our knees don't bend easy [....] Kingsguards do not flee [...] We swore an oath". Yet Selmy didn't follow them in their example even though he was arguably made of the same stuff; True Steel.

  2. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.

  3. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil. And then we see how he sold Princess Myrcella to Dornish serpants for some sweet nothings whispered in his ear in a fashion that would have enraged old Ser Gerold Hightower or Prince Aemon the Dragonknight.

  4. Ser Boros Blount - A well known coward with little to no martial skills who was dishonourable beside. Even Ser Arys didn't shame himself as much as Boros did in his yielding of Prince Tommen.

  5. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable as we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.

  6. Ser Meryn Trant - A cruel, dishonourable man who was a stain on the White Cloak he wore.

  7. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but characterwise he was not much different from other paragons such as Blount, Moore and Trant.

Among the seven, the only real steel were the two surviving member of Aerys II's seven. The five that Robert himself chose were singularly unsuited for the job. How did Robert have such a knack for picking the worst possible aspiring white cloaks? Is there any background information or author's comments available on those appointment?










share|improve this question














When we look at past examples, Kingsguards' history for most part has been illustrious and a shining example of chivalry and honour. There have been rare exceptions every two or three decades or so but that doesn't match up to what happened in Robert's reign.



Robert's Seven could perhaps be called the worst seven ever assembled in the history. Even staunch Baratheon loyalists like Eddard Stark agreed on that much. When we look at the 7:



  1. Ser Barristan Selmy - Although famous in the seven Kingdoms for his honour, Selmy had indeed dishonoured himself by taking Robert's pardon rather than dying for Targaryens like his sworn brothers did. As his Lord Commander and comrades said, "Our knees don't bend easy [....] Kingsguards do not flee [...] We swore an oath". Yet Selmy didn't follow them in their example even though he was arguably made of the same stuff; True Steel.

  2. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.

  3. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil. And then we see how he sold Princess Myrcella to Dornish serpants for some sweet nothings whispered in his ear in a fashion that would have enraged old Ser Gerold Hightower or Prince Aemon the Dragonknight.

  4. Ser Boros Blount - A well known coward with little to no martial skills who was dishonourable beside. Even Ser Arys didn't shame himself as much as Boros did in his yielding of Prince Tommen.

  5. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable as we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.

  6. Ser Meryn Trant - A cruel, dishonourable man who was a stain on the White Cloak he wore.

  7. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but characterwise he was not much different from other paragons such as Blount, Moore and Trant.

Among the seven, the only real steel were the two surviving member of Aerys II's seven. The five that Robert himself chose were singularly unsuited for the job. How did Robert have such a knack for picking the worst possible aspiring white cloaks? Is there any background information or author's comments available on those appointment?







a-song-of-ice-and-fire






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 10 at 17:03









AegonAegon

42.8k16247285




42.8k16247285







  • 48





    I don't have enough for an answer at the moment, but I wonder if it is less related to the character of the current Kingsguard and more related to us not seeing the flaws in prior Kingsguards. Basically the "good old days" weren't actually as good as they seem. This would be consistent with GRRM's style of gray characters vs black and white characters. For example, Aerys' Kingsguard watched him burn people alive. Who knows what atrocities they accomplished in his name.

    – kuhl
    Jun 10 at 17:30







  • 26





    Also, for #1, can't really blame Selmy on that front. He fought until he was in critical condition, Robert sent his own healer to save him, and then offered him the pardon after the Targaryens were dead. It's not like Selmy chose not to die fighting for his King, he just didn't really have a choice to make until after his King was dead and Robert was the new King.

    – DariM
    Jun 10 at 21:40






  • 4





    @kuhl: Exactly! The reputation of prior Kingsguard is surely as much propaganda and legend as fact.

    – Jack Aidley
    Jun 11 at 13:43











  • The knock against several of these is, basically, “Dishonored himself by betraying his King and accepting a pardon from Robert Baratheon.” When Robert Baratheon is usurping the throne and handing out offices, that’s kind of baked into the cake.

    – Davislor
    Jun 11 at 23:52







  • 2





    If you read the books it's very clear that GRRM tries to portray Robert as a very poor judge of character. It even leads to his demise. The writing is all very heavy handed.

    – Darth Egregious
    Jun 12 at 19:09












  • 48





    I don't have enough for an answer at the moment, but I wonder if it is less related to the character of the current Kingsguard and more related to us not seeing the flaws in prior Kingsguards. Basically the "good old days" weren't actually as good as they seem. This would be consistent with GRRM's style of gray characters vs black and white characters. For example, Aerys' Kingsguard watched him burn people alive. Who knows what atrocities they accomplished in his name.

    – kuhl
    Jun 10 at 17:30







  • 26





    Also, for #1, can't really blame Selmy on that front. He fought until he was in critical condition, Robert sent his own healer to save him, and then offered him the pardon after the Targaryens were dead. It's not like Selmy chose not to die fighting for his King, he just didn't really have a choice to make until after his King was dead and Robert was the new King.

    – DariM
    Jun 10 at 21:40






  • 4





    @kuhl: Exactly! The reputation of prior Kingsguard is surely as much propaganda and legend as fact.

    – Jack Aidley
    Jun 11 at 13:43











  • The knock against several of these is, basically, “Dishonored himself by betraying his King and accepting a pardon from Robert Baratheon.” When Robert Baratheon is usurping the throne and handing out offices, that’s kind of baked into the cake.

    – Davislor
    Jun 11 at 23:52







  • 2





    If you read the books it's very clear that GRRM tries to portray Robert as a very poor judge of character. It even leads to his demise. The writing is all very heavy handed.

    – Darth Egregious
    Jun 12 at 19:09







48




48





I don't have enough for an answer at the moment, but I wonder if it is less related to the character of the current Kingsguard and more related to us not seeing the flaws in prior Kingsguards. Basically the "good old days" weren't actually as good as they seem. This would be consistent with GRRM's style of gray characters vs black and white characters. For example, Aerys' Kingsguard watched him burn people alive. Who knows what atrocities they accomplished in his name.

– kuhl
Jun 10 at 17:30






I don't have enough for an answer at the moment, but I wonder if it is less related to the character of the current Kingsguard and more related to us not seeing the flaws in prior Kingsguards. Basically the "good old days" weren't actually as good as they seem. This would be consistent with GRRM's style of gray characters vs black and white characters. For example, Aerys' Kingsguard watched him burn people alive. Who knows what atrocities they accomplished in his name.

– kuhl
Jun 10 at 17:30





26




26





Also, for #1, can't really blame Selmy on that front. He fought until he was in critical condition, Robert sent his own healer to save him, and then offered him the pardon after the Targaryens were dead. It's not like Selmy chose not to die fighting for his King, he just didn't really have a choice to make until after his King was dead and Robert was the new King.

– DariM
Jun 10 at 21:40





Also, for #1, can't really blame Selmy on that front. He fought until he was in critical condition, Robert sent his own healer to save him, and then offered him the pardon after the Targaryens were dead. It's not like Selmy chose not to die fighting for his King, he just didn't really have a choice to make until after his King was dead and Robert was the new King.

– DariM
Jun 10 at 21:40




4




4





@kuhl: Exactly! The reputation of prior Kingsguard is surely as much propaganda and legend as fact.

– Jack Aidley
Jun 11 at 13:43





@kuhl: Exactly! The reputation of prior Kingsguard is surely as much propaganda and legend as fact.

– Jack Aidley
Jun 11 at 13:43













The knock against several of these is, basically, “Dishonored himself by betraying his King and accepting a pardon from Robert Baratheon.” When Robert Baratheon is usurping the throne and handing out offices, that’s kind of baked into the cake.

– Davislor
Jun 11 at 23:52






The knock against several of these is, basically, “Dishonored himself by betraying his King and accepting a pardon from Robert Baratheon.” When Robert Baratheon is usurping the throne and handing out offices, that’s kind of baked into the cake.

– Davislor
Jun 11 at 23:52





2




2





If you read the books it's very clear that GRRM tries to portray Robert as a very poor judge of character. It even leads to his demise. The writing is all very heavy handed.

– Darth Egregious
Jun 12 at 19:09





If you read the books it's very clear that GRRM tries to portray Robert as a very poor judge of character. It even leads to his demise. The writing is all very heavy handed.

– Darth Egregious
Jun 12 at 19:09










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















62














Because Robert Baratheon was not a good king.



Many characters repeatedly emphasize that Robert Baratheon, while a mighty warrior and a worthy knight in his prime, did not have the judgment, skill or temperament to make a good king.




Robert was never the same after he put on that crown. Some men are like swords, made for fighting. Hang them up and they go to rust.



A Clash of Kings, ch. 6



He was a good knight but a bad king, for he had no right to the throne he sat.



A Dance with Dragons, ch. 11




Even Robert himself did not feel that he was qualified for the task, and he spent much of his time getting drunk, sleeping around, and reminiscing about his glory days.




I swear to you, I was never so alive as when I was winning this throne, or so dead as now that I've won it.



A Game of Thrones, ch. 30




Because Robert was so unhappy doing the work of the king he allowed his advisors and his wife to influence many of his decisions, leading to several appointments to the Kingsguard that were for their loyalty to third parties rather than their worth. Varys explicitly notes as much to Eddard Stark.




Ser Boros and Ser Meryn are the queen’s creatures to the bone, and I have deep suspicions of the others. No, my lord, when the swords come out in earnest, you will be the only true friend Robert Baratheon will have.



A Game of Thrones, ch. 30







share|improve this answer






























    51














    From the Citadel, GRRM replied to a similar question in this way:




    5) Why were men like Meryn Trant, Boros Blount, Preston Greenfield and Arys Oakheart ever accepted as White Swords? Nobody thinks much of
    their skill.



    GRRM: Sometimes the best knights are not eager to take such stringent vows, and you have to settle for who you can get. Other
    factors also enter into the choices -- politics, favoritism, horse
    trading, rewards for past service, etc. It's a plum appointment for a
    younger son, or a knight from a minor house. Less so for the Great
    Houses. Also, Robert had five vacancies to fill all at once, an
    unusual situation -- imagine the nominations we might get if six of
    the nine members of the Supreme Court all died within a few months.



    Institutions like the Kingsguard change over time. The original
    Knights of the Garter were warriors all, the strongest, bravest,
    deadliest men of their time, with an average age under thirty. The
    present Knights of the Garter are octagenarians, and their parades are
    processions of wheelchairs and walkers.
    So Spake Martin - The
    Kingsguard




    He similarly absolve Jaime and Barristan on claiming pardon on technicalities.




    4) Does the oath of a Kingsguard include to serve whoever is the king, even if the new king rebelled against the old one, or did Jaime and Barristan choose to continue their service as Robert was crowned?



    GRRM: The oaths did not envision rebellion, actually. Robert pardoned Barristan and Jaime, and they accepted the pardon and continued to serve.
    ibid




    So it seems that political motivations paved the way for more controversial appointments when we look at the members. The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, the following:



    1. The candidate must be good with sword, lance or spear.

    2. The candidate must not come from a too influential family although exceptions like Jaime Lannister, Prince Aemon, Gerold Hightower, Raymont Baratheon etc exist.

    3. The candidate must be honourable.

    We also have precedent where KG cloaks are used as an incentive to get political support of different houses e.g. Loras Tyrell or Young Griff holding out white cloaks. So politics definitely plays a role.



    • Preston Greenfield is likely a kin to Lord Greenfield who is a vassal to Lord Tywin Lannister, Robert's father-in-law. He seems to be appointed to appease Westerlands and Lord Tywin. The family has no significant political power.

    • Ser Arys Oakheart comes from a Targaryen loyalist family from the Reach. This seems to be a conciliatory gesture towards the former loyalists just like Aegon III's seven included members from both Black and Green families. The family is a major one but not one of the Great Houses.

    • Boros Blount comes from a minor house from Crownlands. Seems to be the same case as Oakheart. The family has no significant political power.

    • Mandon Moore comes from the Vale and since he came to KL with Lord Jon Arryn, it seems Robert appointed Moore on Lord Arryn's request as a reward for Vale's support for Robert in the war. The family has no significant political power.

    • Meryn Trant comes from a minor family in Stormlands, Robert's own ancestral holdings. This seems to be a case favouritism or reward for service of the family.

    • Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. The significance for making sure that most KG came from minor families should become clear from Jaime's case. The political considerations in case of powerful families are too huge to let honour be a nuisance.

    • Barristan Selmy, technically not in any wrong at all according to the author. He also comes from Stormlands and is the son of the Lord of Harvest Hall, a key vassal to Baratheons.

    Kuhl's comment about not seeing the flaws of prior KG is worth noting. We condemn Robert's Seven for standing by Joffrey as he lurched from one evil to another, even beating his betrothed for him. But Aerys' seven, who are considered shining paragons of chivalry, did nothing more than Joffrey's seven did as Aerys tortured his wife in a bestial manner even though they were sworn to protect the women (Jaime tried to intervene once when he stood guard outside the Queen's door but he was stopped by his comrades who said they were sworn to defend the Queen but not from the King) or burnt his "opponents" even though they were sworn to defend the helpless. Maegor's and Aegon II's seven did the same (Although there are rumours that it was the KG who killed both of them eventually).



    So in conclusion:



    1. Robert faced the virtually unprecedented situation of filling five vacancies. The only time something of this magnitude happened before was when the order was founded and Queen Visenya picked 7 men. He was bound to make some mistakes.

    2. Best suited men might not have been eager to take the strict vows so Robert had to make do.

    3. Political considerations like rewarding his supporters, appeasing the former enemies, doing a favour to crucial allies played a role in the appointments.





    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      "The candidate must not come from a too influential family" - source for this being a criterion in choosing? As you mention, there are quite a number of exceptions. I see your reasoning for why it might be a good idea, but are you sure it actually was a conscious criterion?

      – Rand al'Thor
      Jun 11 at 6:27






    • 2





      @Randal'Thor As I noted, The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, so it's delving into the realm of speculation really, not canon. We see 1 Velaryon, 1 Baratheon, 1 Tyrell, 1 Targaryen 1 Martell and 1 Lannister in all history of KG which basically makes all the Great Houses that ever had a son wear the white cloak. (Velaryons added by virtue of being the 2nd house of the realm during most of Targ era).

      – Aegon
      Jun 11 at 6:48






    • 2





      In Major houses we see 2 Darry, 7 Darklyns, 1 Bracken, 1 Strong, 1 Redwyne, 1 Marbrand, 1 Peake, 2 Oakhearts, 1 Crakehall, 1 Corbray, 1 Hightower and 1 Whent. Which makes all of the Whiteswords from Major houses. Evidently, the representation of minor houses and lowborns is much higher than that of the Great Houses and Major Houses.

      – Aegon
      Jun 11 at 6:50






    • 9





      Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. Also note that the decision to make Jaime a white sword to begin with was also very much political in nature.

      – JAD
      Jun 11 at 7:05


















    5














    There are counterarguments to some of the listed men though.




    1. Ser Barristan Selmy



    First of all, it makes little sense for Robert B to punish someone for (surprisingly) bending the knee to him.



    But in my opinion more importantly, Selmy was well aware of what the Mad King had become, and has always been portrayed as someone who understand honor rather than abiding by rules he doesn't understand (quite similar to Ned).



    It's this character trait that ends up getting him exiled (pretty much voluntarily) as he stood up for what he believed was the right thing to do. If Selmy at some point sees Aerys' madness and is convinced that he's a danger to the realm, then Selmy is going to act on his conscience more than his oath.



    This makes Barristan capable of understanding that an oath sworn to a king who turns on his own people is effectively invalidated. Selmy swore an oath to protect his king to the death, but when Aerys stops being regnal, you can argue that Selmy's oath no longer applies either.




    1. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.



    Same argument as Barristan, but even more poignant because Jaime stopped the Mad King.



    Jaime was also a renowned swordsman. Being a Kingsguard doesn't just require honor, it requires actual skill in combat, of which Jaime had plenty.



    You have to understand that "kingslaying" is only a crime to those who still considered Aerys a rightful king. Robert very much utilized the demonization of Aerys' madness to justify his rebellion.

    Robert can't then punish Jaime for killing Aerys while Robert himself was trying to kill Aerys. And even if he could, why would he want to?




    1. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil.



    Notice how much of that description fits Robert B to a tee. People are usually blind to their own traits, and that extends to people who are like them.




    1. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable



    The same applies to the Mountain and (at that time) the Hound. The Cleganes have a clear purpose: they are deterrents. I have little good to say about ruling through fear and savagery, but it does keep people in line.



    Think of it as good cop (e.g. Selmy)/bad cop (Moore). Every criminal tends to start liking one over the other and opening up (or yielding) to them. Different people yield to good knight/bad knight differently.




    we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.




    One man's eager abuser is another man's deeply loyal servant who immediately obeys a command. I can spin this to use it as proof of loyalty to the king.




    1. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but...



    Robert's reign was peaceful, but it was taken by violence. His initial reign was shaky and under possibly counterattack from Targaryen loyalists. It makes sense for Robert to favor swordsmen (loyal to him) over (pure) honorable men as his personal bodyguards.




    I do agree on the other mentions, but most Kingsguard had sufficiently valid credentials for Robert to consider giving them the white cloak.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      The overarching point is that most of these are not those that you would trust with your life to protect you... the whole point of the Kingsguard. Your argument does little to convince otherwise that these would protect the king with their lives when it comes down to it.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      Jun 11 at 10:22






    • 1





      @TheLethalCarrot: My opinion doesn't matter. Robert's does. I agree that the KG lineup was a bunch of bad choices, but that doesn't mean that Robert knowingly made bad choices. He's a flawed human with flawed reasoning (like pretty much everyone), but that doesn't mean he didn't have some reasons (even if misguided) about who to make his KG. Repurposing OP's quote to apply to Robert: "Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil." Even flawed men have their reasons.

      – Flater
      Jun 11 at 10:25







    • 1





      @Flater And I think you're not giving Robert enough credit, he might not be the wisest or cleverest man but he's smarter than you're interpreting him to be.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      Jun 11 at 10:29






    • 1





      @TheLethalCarrot: I'm not sure how that factors into the answer. If you argue that he's smarter than the KG choices he made, does that mean you're arguing he knowingly appointed a worse KG than he could've had? Because that would need elaboration in an answer of its own as to what his ulterior motives were.

      – Flater
      Jun 11 at 10:32







    • 3





      @Flater As Aeg's answer states maybe he wanted to appoint better Kingsguard but they refused and/or didn't want to join. If these were his first choices, and you could prove that, my stance would change but as far as I know we don't have any information on whether or not he wanted to appoint others beforehand. And I'll leave the discussion there.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      Jun 11 at 10:35












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f214234%2fwhy-did-robert-pick-unworthy-men-for-the-white-cloaks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    62














    Because Robert Baratheon was not a good king.



    Many characters repeatedly emphasize that Robert Baratheon, while a mighty warrior and a worthy knight in his prime, did not have the judgment, skill or temperament to make a good king.




    Robert was never the same after he put on that crown. Some men are like swords, made for fighting. Hang them up and they go to rust.



    A Clash of Kings, ch. 6



    He was a good knight but a bad king, for he had no right to the throne he sat.



    A Dance with Dragons, ch. 11




    Even Robert himself did not feel that he was qualified for the task, and he spent much of his time getting drunk, sleeping around, and reminiscing about his glory days.




    I swear to you, I was never so alive as when I was winning this throne, or so dead as now that I've won it.



    A Game of Thrones, ch. 30




    Because Robert was so unhappy doing the work of the king he allowed his advisors and his wife to influence many of his decisions, leading to several appointments to the Kingsguard that were for their loyalty to third parties rather than their worth. Varys explicitly notes as much to Eddard Stark.




    Ser Boros and Ser Meryn are the queen’s creatures to the bone, and I have deep suspicions of the others. No, my lord, when the swords come out in earnest, you will be the only true friend Robert Baratheon will have.



    A Game of Thrones, ch. 30







    share|improve this answer



























      62














      Because Robert Baratheon was not a good king.



      Many characters repeatedly emphasize that Robert Baratheon, while a mighty warrior and a worthy knight in his prime, did not have the judgment, skill or temperament to make a good king.




      Robert was never the same after he put on that crown. Some men are like swords, made for fighting. Hang them up and they go to rust.



      A Clash of Kings, ch. 6



      He was a good knight but a bad king, for he had no right to the throne he sat.



      A Dance with Dragons, ch. 11




      Even Robert himself did not feel that he was qualified for the task, and he spent much of his time getting drunk, sleeping around, and reminiscing about his glory days.




      I swear to you, I was never so alive as when I was winning this throne, or so dead as now that I've won it.



      A Game of Thrones, ch. 30




      Because Robert was so unhappy doing the work of the king he allowed his advisors and his wife to influence many of his decisions, leading to several appointments to the Kingsguard that were for their loyalty to third parties rather than their worth. Varys explicitly notes as much to Eddard Stark.




      Ser Boros and Ser Meryn are the queen’s creatures to the bone, and I have deep suspicions of the others. No, my lord, when the swords come out in earnest, you will be the only true friend Robert Baratheon will have.



      A Game of Thrones, ch. 30







      share|improve this answer

























        62












        62








        62







        Because Robert Baratheon was not a good king.



        Many characters repeatedly emphasize that Robert Baratheon, while a mighty warrior and a worthy knight in his prime, did not have the judgment, skill or temperament to make a good king.




        Robert was never the same after he put on that crown. Some men are like swords, made for fighting. Hang them up and they go to rust.



        A Clash of Kings, ch. 6



        He was a good knight but a bad king, for he had no right to the throne he sat.



        A Dance with Dragons, ch. 11




        Even Robert himself did not feel that he was qualified for the task, and he spent much of his time getting drunk, sleeping around, and reminiscing about his glory days.




        I swear to you, I was never so alive as when I was winning this throne, or so dead as now that I've won it.



        A Game of Thrones, ch. 30




        Because Robert was so unhappy doing the work of the king he allowed his advisors and his wife to influence many of his decisions, leading to several appointments to the Kingsguard that were for their loyalty to third parties rather than their worth. Varys explicitly notes as much to Eddard Stark.




        Ser Boros and Ser Meryn are the queen’s creatures to the bone, and I have deep suspicions of the others. No, my lord, when the swords come out in earnest, you will be the only true friend Robert Baratheon will have.



        A Game of Thrones, ch. 30







        share|improve this answer













        Because Robert Baratheon was not a good king.



        Many characters repeatedly emphasize that Robert Baratheon, while a mighty warrior and a worthy knight in his prime, did not have the judgment, skill or temperament to make a good king.




        Robert was never the same after he put on that crown. Some men are like swords, made for fighting. Hang them up and they go to rust.



        A Clash of Kings, ch. 6



        He was a good knight but a bad king, for he had no right to the throne he sat.



        A Dance with Dragons, ch. 11




        Even Robert himself did not feel that he was qualified for the task, and he spent much of his time getting drunk, sleeping around, and reminiscing about his glory days.




        I swear to you, I was never so alive as when I was winning this throne, or so dead as now that I've won it.



        A Game of Thrones, ch. 30




        Because Robert was so unhappy doing the work of the king he allowed his advisors and his wife to influence many of his decisions, leading to several appointments to the Kingsguard that were for their loyalty to third parties rather than their worth. Varys explicitly notes as much to Eddard Stark.




        Ser Boros and Ser Meryn are the queen’s creatures to the bone, and I have deep suspicions of the others. No, my lord, when the swords come out in earnest, you will be the only true friend Robert Baratheon will have.



        A Game of Thrones, ch. 30








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jun 10 at 17:31









        Kyle DoyleKyle Doyle

        6,78521942




        6,78521942























            51














            From the Citadel, GRRM replied to a similar question in this way:




            5) Why were men like Meryn Trant, Boros Blount, Preston Greenfield and Arys Oakheart ever accepted as White Swords? Nobody thinks much of
            their skill.



            GRRM: Sometimes the best knights are not eager to take such stringent vows, and you have to settle for who you can get. Other
            factors also enter into the choices -- politics, favoritism, horse
            trading, rewards for past service, etc. It's a plum appointment for a
            younger son, or a knight from a minor house. Less so for the Great
            Houses. Also, Robert had five vacancies to fill all at once, an
            unusual situation -- imagine the nominations we might get if six of
            the nine members of the Supreme Court all died within a few months.



            Institutions like the Kingsguard change over time. The original
            Knights of the Garter were warriors all, the strongest, bravest,
            deadliest men of their time, with an average age under thirty. The
            present Knights of the Garter are octagenarians, and their parades are
            processions of wheelchairs and walkers.
            So Spake Martin - The
            Kingsguard




            He similarly absolve Jaime and Barristan on claiming pardon on technicalities.




            4) Does the oath of a Kingsguard include to serve whoever is the king, even if the new king rebelled against the old one, or did Jaime and Barristan choose to continue their service as Robert was crowned?



            GRRM: The oaths did not envision rebellion, actually. Robert pardoned Barristan and Jaime, and they accepted the pardon and continued to serve.
            ibid




            So it seems that political motivations paved the way for more controversial appointments when we look at the members. The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, the following:



            1. The candidate must be good with sword, lance or spear.

            2. The candidate must not come from a too influential family although exceptions like Jaime Lannister, Prince Aemon, Gerold Hightower, Raymont Baratheon etc exist.

            3. The candidate must be honourable.

            We also have precedent where KG cloaks are used as an incentive to get political support of different houses e.g. Loras Tyrell or Young Griff holding out white cloaks. So politics definitely plays a role.



            • Preston Greenfield is likely a kin to Lord Greenfield who is a vassal to Lord Tywin Lannister, Robert's father-in-law. He seems to be appointed to appease Westerlands and Lord Tywin. The family has no significant political power.

            • Ser Arys Oakheart comes from a Targaryen loyalist family from the Reach. This seems to be a conciliatory gesture towards the former loyalists just like Aegon III's seven included members from both Black and Green families. The family is a major one but not one of the Great Houses.

            • Boros Blount comes from a minor house from Crownlands. Seems to be the same case as Oakheart. The family has no significant political power.

            • Mandon Moore comes from the Vale and since he came to KL with Lord Jon Arryn, it seems Robert appointed Moore on Lord Arryn's request as a reward for Vale's support for Robert in the war. The family has no significant political power.

            • Meryn Trant comes from a minor family in Stormlands, Robert's own ancestral holdings. This seems to be a case favouritism or reward for service of the family.

            • Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. The significance for making sure that most KG came from minor families should become clear from Jaime's case. The political considerations in case of powerful families are too huge to let honour be a nuisance.

            • Barristan Selmy, technically not in any wrong at all according to the author. He also comes from Stormlands and is the son of the Lord of Harvest Hall, a key vassal to Baratheons.

            Kuhl's comment about not seeing the flaws of prior KG is worth noting. We condemn Robert's Seven for standing by Joffrey as he lurched from one evil to another, even beating his betrothed for him. But Aerys' seven, who are considered shining paragons of chivalry, did nothing more than Joffrey's seven did as Aerys tortured his wife in a bestial manner even though they were sworn to protect the women (Jaime tried to intervene once when he stood guard outside the Queen's door but he was stopped by his comrades who said they were sworn to defend the Queen but not from the King) or burnt his "opponents" even though they were sworn to defend the helpless. Maegor's and Aegon II's seven did the same (Although there are rumours that it was the KG who killed both of them eventually).



            So in conclusion:



            1. Robert faced the virtually unprecedented situation of filling five vacancies. The only time something of this magnitude happened before was when the order was founded and Queen Visenya picked 7 men. He was bound to make some mistakes.

            2. Best suited men might not have been eager to take the strict vows so Robert had to make do.

            3. Political considerations like rewarding his supporters, appeasing the former enemies, doing a favour to crucial allies played a role in the appointments.





            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              "The candidate must not come from a too influential family" - source for this being a criterion in choosing? As you mention, there are quite a number of exceptions. I see your reasoning for why it might be a good idea, but are you sure it actually was a conscious criterion?

              – Rand al'Thor
              Jun 11 at 6:27






            • 2





              @Randal'Thor As I noted, The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, so it's delving into the realm of speculation really, not canon. We see 1 Velaryon, 1 Baratheon, 1 Tyrell, 1 Targaryen 1 Martell and 1 Lannister in all history of KG which basically makes all the Great Houses that ever had a son wear the white cloak. (Velaryons added by virtue of being the 2nd house of the realm during most of Targ era).

              – Aegon
              Jun 11 at 6:48






            • 2





              In Major houses we see 2 Darry, 7 Darklyns, 1 Bracken, 1 Strong, 1 Redwyne, 1 Marbrand, 1 Peake, 2 Oakhearts, 1 Crakehall, 1 Corbray, 1 Hightower and 1 Whent. Which makes all of the Whiteswords from Major houses. Evidently, the representation of minor houses and lowborns is much higher than that of the Great Houses and Major Houses.

              – Aegon
              Jun 11 at 6:50






            • 9





              Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. Also note that the decision to make Jaime a white sword to begin with was also very much political in nature.

              – JAD
              Jun 11 at 7:05















            51














            From the Citadel, GRRM replied to a similar question in this way:




            5) Why were men like Meryn Trant, Boros Blount, Preston Greenfield and Arys Oakheart ever accepted as White Swords? Nobody thinks much of
            their skill.



            GRRM: Sometimes the best knights are not eager to take such stringent vows, and you have to settle for who you can get. Other
            factors also enter into the choices -- politics, favoritism, horse
            trading, rewards for past service, etc. It's a plum appointment for a
            younger son, or a knight from a minor house. Less so for the Great
            Houses. Also, Robert had five vacancies to fill all at once, an
            unusual situation -- imagine the nominations we might get if six of
            the nine members of the Supreme Court all died within a few months.



            Institutions like the Kingsguard change over time. The original
            Knights of the Garter were warriors all, the strongest, bravest,
            deadliest men of their time, with an average age under thirty. The
            present Knights of the Garter are octagenarians, and their parades are
            processions of wheelchairs and walkers.
            So Spake Martin - The
            Kingsguard




            He similarly absolve Jaime and Barristan on claiming pardon on technicalities.




            4) Does the oath of a Kingsguard include to serve whoever is the king, even if the new king rebelled against the old one, or did Jaime and Barristan choose to continue their service as Robert was crowned?



            GRRM: The oaths did not envision rebellion, actually. Robert pardoned Barristan and Jaime, and they accepted the pardon and continued to serve.
            ibid




            So it seems that political motivations paved the way for more controversial appointments when we look at the members. The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, the following:



            1. The candidate must be good with sword, lance or spear.

            2. The candidate must not come from a too influential family although exceptions like Jaime Lannister, Prince Aemon, Gerold Hightower, Raymont Baratheon etc exist.

            3. The candidate must be honourable.

            We also have precedent where KG cloaks are used as an incentive to get political support of different houses e.g. Loras Tyrell or Young Griff holding out white cloaks. So politics definitely plays a role.



            • Preston Greenfield is likely a kin to Lord Greenfield who is a vassal to Lord Tywin Lannister, Robert's father-in-law. He seems to be appointed to appease Westerlands and Lord Tywin. The family has no significant political power.

            • Ser Arys Oakheart comes from a Targaryen loyalist family from the Reach. This seems to be a conciliatory gesture towards the former loyalists just like Aegon III's seven included members from both Black and Green families. The family is a major one but not one of the Great Houses.

            • Boros Blount comes from a minor house from Crownlands. Seems to be the same case as Oakheart. The family has no significant political power.

            • Mandon Moore comes from the Vale and since he came to KL with Lord Jon Arryn, it seems Robert appointed Moore on Lord Arryn's request as a reward for Vale's support for Robert in the war. The family has no significant political power.

            • Meryn Trant comes from a minor family in Stormlands, Robert's own ancestral holdings. This seems to be a case favouritism or reward for service of the family.

            • Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. The significance for making sure that most KG came from minor families should become clear from Jaime's case. The political considerations in case of powerful families are too huge to let honour be a nuisance.

            • Barristan Selmy, technically not in any wrong at all according to the author. He also comes from Stormlands and is the son of the Lord of Harvest Hall, a key vassal to Baratheons.

            Kuhl's comment about not seeing the flaws of prior KG is worth noting. We condemn Robert's Seven for standing by Joffrey as he lurched from one evil to another, even beating his betrothed for him. But Aerys' seven, who are considered shining paragons of chivalry, did nothing more than Joffrey's seven did as Aerys tortured his wife in a bestial manner even though they were sworn to protect the women (Jaime tried to intervene once when he stood guard outside the Queen's door but he was stopped by his comrades who said they were sworn to defend the Queen but not from the King) or burnt his "opponents" even though they were sworn to defend the helpless. Maegor's and Aegon II's seven did the same (Although there are rumours that it was the KG who killed both of them eventually).



            So in conclusion:



            1. Robert faced the virtually unprecedented situation of filling five vacancies. The only time something of this magnitude happened before was when the order was founded and Queen Visenya picked 7 men. He was bound to make some mistakes.

            2. Best suited men might not have been eager to take the strict vows so Robert had to make do.

            3. Political considerations like rewarding his supporters, appeasing the former enemies, doing a favour to crucial allies played a role in the appointments.





            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              "The candidate must not come from a too influential family" - source for this being a criterion in choosing? As you mention, there are quite a number of exceptions. I see your reasoning for why it might be a good idea, but are you sure it actually was a conscious criterion?

              – Rand al'Thor
              Jun 11 at 6:27






            • 2





              @Randal'Thor As I noted, The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, so it's delving into the realm of speculation really, not canon. We see 1 Velaryon, 1 Baratheon, 1 Tyrell, 1 Targaryen 1 Martell and 1 Lannister in all history of KG which basically makes all the Great Houses that ever had a son wear the white cloak. (Velaryons added by virtue of being the 2nd house of the realm during most of Targ era).

              – Aegon
              Jun 11 at 6:48






            • 2





              In Major houses we see 2 Darry, 7 Darklyns, 1 Bracken, 1 Strong, 1 Redwyne, 1 Marbrand, 1 Peake, 2 Oakhearts, 1 Crakehall, 1 Corbray, 1 Hightower and 1 Whent. Which makes all of the Whiteswords from Major houses. Evidently, the representation of minor houses and lowborns is much higher than that of the Great Houses and Major Houses.

              – Aegon
              Jun 11 at 6:50






            • 9





              Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. Also note that the decision to make Jaime a white sword to begin with was also very much political in nature.

              – JAD
              Jun 11 at 7:05













            51












            51








            51







            From the Citadel, GRRM replied to a similar question in this way:




            5) Why were men like Meryn Trant, Boros Blount, Preston Greenfield and Arys Oakheart ever accepted as White Swords? Nobody thinks much of
            their skill.



            GRRM: Sometimes the best knights are not eager to take such stringent vows, and you have to settle for who you can get. Other
            factors also enter into the choices -- politics, favoritism, horse
            trading, rewards for past service, etc. It's a plum appointment for a
            younger son, or a knight from a minor house. Less so for the Great
            Houses. Also, Robert had five vacancies to fill all at once, an
            unusual situation -- imagine the nominations we might get if six of
            the nine members of the Supreme Court all died within a few months.



            Institutions like the Kingsguard change over time. The original
            Knights of the Garter were warriors all, the strongest, bravest,
            deadliest men of their time, with an average age under thirty. The
            present Knights of the Garter are octagenarians, and their parades are
            processions of wheelchairs and walkers.
            So Spake Martin - The
            Kingsguard




            He similarly absolve Jaime and Barristan on claiming pardon on technicalities.




            4) Does the oath of a Kingsguard include to serve whoever is the king, even if the new king rebelled against the old one, or did Jaime and Barristan choose to continue their service as Robert was crowned?



            GRRM: The oaths did not envision rebellion, actually. Robert pardoned Barristan and Jaime, and they accepted the pardon and continued to serve.
            ibid




            So it seems that political motivations paved the way for more controversial appointments when we look at the members. The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, the following:



            1. The candidate must be good with sword, lance or spear.

            2. The candidate must not come from a too influential family although exceptions like Jaime Lannister, Prince Aemon, Gerold Hightower, Raymont Baratheon etc exist.

            3. The candidate must be honourable.

            We also have precedent where KG cloaks are used as an incentive to get political support of different houses e.g. Loras Tyrell or Young Griff holding out white cloaks. So politics definitely plays a role.



            • Preston Greenfield is likely a kin to Lord Greenfield who is a vassal to Lord Tywin Lannister, Robert's father-in-law. He seems to be appointed to appease Westerlands and Lord Tywin. The family has no significant political power.

            • Ser Arys Oakheart comes from a Targaryen loyalist family from the Reach. This seems to be a conciliatory gesture towards the former loyalists just like Aegon III's seven included members from both Black and Green families. The family is a major one but not one of the Great Houses.

            • Boros Blount comes from a minor house from Crownlands. Seems to be the same case as Oakheart. The family has no significant political power.

            • Mandon Moore comes from the Vale and since he came to KL with Lord Jon Arryn, it seems Robert appointed Moore on Lord Arryn's request as a reward for Vale's support for Robert in the war. The family has no significant political power.

            • Meryn Trant comes from a minor family in Stormlands, Robert's own ancestral holdings. This seems to be a case favouritism or reward for service of the family.

            • Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. The significance for making sure that most KG came from minor families should become clear from Jaime's case. The political considerations in case of powerful families are too huge to let honour be a nuisance.

            • Barristan Selmy, technically not in any wrong at all according to the author. He also comes from Stormlands and is the son of the Lord of Harvest Hall, a key vassal to Baratheons.

            Kuhl's comment about not seeing the flaws of prior KG is worth noting. We condemn Robert's Seven for standing by Joffrey as he lurched from one evil to another, even beating his betrothed for him. But Aerys' seven, who are considered shining paragons of chivalry, did nothing more than Joffrey's seven did as Aerys tortured his wife in a bestial manner even though they were sworn to protect the women (Jaime tried to intervene once when he stood guard outside the Queen's door but he was stopped by his comrades who said they were sworn to defend the Queen but not from the King) or burnt his "opponents" even though they were sworn to defend the helpless. Maegor's and Aegon II's seven did the same (Although there are rumours that it was the KG who killed both of them eventually).



            So in conclusion:



            1. Robert faced the virtually unprecedented situation of filling five vacancies. The only time something of this magnitude happened before was when the order was founded and Queen Visenya picked 7 men. He was bound to make some mistakes.

            2. Best suited men might not have been eager to take the strict vows so Robert had to make do.

            3. Political considerations like rewarding his supporters, appeasing the former enemies, doing a favour to crucial allies played a role in the appointments.





            share|improve this answer















            From the Citadel, GRRM replied to a similar question in this way:




            5) Why were men like Meryn Trant, Boros Blount, Preston Greenfield and Arys Oakheart ever accepted as White Swords? Nobody thinks much of
            their skill.



            GRRM: Sometimes the best knights are not eager to take such stringent vows, and you have to settle for who you can get. Other
            factors also enter into the choices -- politics, favoritism, horse
            trading, rewards for past service, etc. It's a plum appointment for a
            younger son, or a knight from a minor house. Less so for the Great
            Houses. Also, Robert had five vacancies to fill all at once, an
            unusual situation -- imagine the nominations we might get if six of
            the nine members of the Supreme Court all died within a few months.



            Institutions like the Kingsguard change over time. The original
            Knights of the Garter were warriors all, the strongest, bravest,
            deadliest men of their time, with an average age under thirty. The
            present Knights of the Garter are octagenarians, and their parades are
            processions of wheelchairs and walkers.
            So Spake Martin - The
            Kingsguard




            He similarly absolve Jaime and Barristan on claiming pardon on technicalities.




            4) Does the oath of a Kingsguard include to serve whoever is the king, even if the new king rebelled against the old one, or did Jaime and Barristan choose to continue their service as Robert was crowned?



            GRRM: The oaths did not envision rebellion, actually. Robert pardoned Barristan and Jaime, and they accepted the pardon and continued to serve.
            ibid




            So it seems that political motivations paved the way for more controversial appointments when we look at the members. The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, the following:



            1. The candidate must be good with sword, lance or spear.

            2. The candidate must not come from a too influential family although exceptions like Jaime Lannister, Prince Aemon, Gerold Hightower, Raymont Baratheon etc exist.

            3. The candidate must be honourable.

            We also have precedent where KG cloaks are used as an incentive to get political support of different houses e.g. Loras Tyrell or Young Griff holding out white cloaks. So politics definitely plays a role.



            • Preston Greenfield is likely a kin to Lord Greenfield who is a vassal to Lord Tywin Lannister, Robert's father-in-law. He seems to be appointed to appease Westerlands and Lord Tywin. The family has no significant political power.

            • Ser Arys Oakheart comes from a Targaryen loyalist family from the Reach. This seems to be a conciliatory gesture towards the former loyalists just like Aegon III's seven included members from both Black and Green families. The family is a major one but not one of the Great Houses.

            • Boros Blount comes from a minor house from Crownlands. Seems to be the same case as Oakheart. The family has no significant political power.

            • Mandon Moore comes from the Vale and since he came to KL with Lord Jon Arryn, it seems Robert appointed Moore on Lord Arryn's request as a reward for Vale's support for Robert in the war. The family has no significant political power.

            • Meryn Trant comes from a minor family in Stormlands, Robert's own ancestral holdings. This seems to be a case favouritism or reward for service of the family.

            • Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. The significance for making sure that most KG came from minor families should become clear from Jaime's case. The political considerations in case of powerful families are too huge to let honour be a nuisance.

            • Barristan Selmy, technically not in any wrong at all according to the author. He also comes from Stormlands and is the son of the Lord of Harvest Hall, a key vassal to Baratheons.

            Kuhl's comment about not seeing the flaws of prior KG is worth noting. We condemn Robert's Seven for standing by Joffrey as he lurched from one evil to another, even beating his betrothed for him. But Aerys' seven, who are considered shining paragons of chivalry, did nothing more than Joffrey's seven did as Aerys tortured his wife in a bestial manner even though they were sworn to protect the women (Jaime tried to intervene once when he stood guard outside the Queen's door but he was stopped by his comrades who said they were sworn to defend the Queen but not from the King) or burnt his "opponents" even though they were sworn to defend the helpless. Maegor's and Aegon II's seven did the same (Although there are rumours that it was the KG who killed both of them eventually).



            So in conclusion:



            1. Robert faced the virtually unprecedented situation of filling five vacancies. The only time something of this magnitude happened before was when the order was founded and Queen Visenya picked 7 men. He was bound to make some mistakes.

            2. Best suited men might not have been eager to take the strict vows so Robert had to make do.

            3. Political considerations like rewarding his supporters, appeasing the former enemies, doing a favour to crucial allies played a role in the appointments.






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jun 10 at 19:35

























            answered Jun 10 at 17:47









            AegonAegon

            42.8k16247285




            42.8k16247285







            • 3





              "The candidate must not come from a too influential family" - source for this being a criterion in choosing? As you mention, there are quite a number of exceptions. I see your reasoning for why it might be a good idea, but are you sure it actually was a conscious criterion?

              – Rand al'Thor
              Jun 11 at 6:27






            • 2





              @Randal'Thor As I noted, The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, so it's delving into the realm of speculation really, not canon. We see 1 Velaryon, 1 Baratheon, 1 Tyrell, 1 Targaryen 1 Martell and 1 Lannister in all history of KG which basically makes all the Great Houses that ever had a son wear the white cloak. (Velaryons added by virtue of being the 2nd house of the realm during most of Targ era).

              – Aegon
              Jun 11 at 6:48






            • 2





              In Major houses we see 2 Darry, 7 Darklyns, 1 Bracken, 1 Strong, 1 Redwyne, 1 Marbrand, 1 Peake, 2 Oakhearts, 1 Crakehall, 1 Corbray, 1 Hightower and 1 Whent. Which makes all of the Whiteswords from Major houses. Evidently, the representation of minor houses and lowborns is much higher than that of the Great Houses and Major Houses.

              – Aegon
              Jun 11 at 6:50






            • 9





              Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. Also note that the decision to make Jaime a white sword to begin with was also very much political in nature.

              – JAD
              Jun 11 at 7:05












            • 3





              "The candidate must not come from a too influential family" - source for this being a criterion in choosing? As you mention, there are quite a number of exceptions. I see your reasoning for why it might be a good idea, but are you sure it actually was a conscious criterion?

              – Rand al'Thor
              Jun 11 at 6:27






            • 2





              @Randal'Thor As I noted, The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, so it's delving into the realm of speculation really, not canon. We see 1 Velaryon, 1 Baratheon, 1 Tyrell, 1 Targaryen 1 Martell and 1 Lannister in all history of KG which basically makes all the Great Houses that ever had a son wear the white cloak. (Velaryons added by virtue of being the 2nd house of the realm during most of Targ era).

              – Aegon
              Jun 11 at 6:48






            • 2





              In Major houses we see 2 Darry, 7 Darklyns, 1 Bracken, 1 Strong, 1 Redwyne, 1 Marbrand, 1 Peake, 2 Oakhearts, 1 Crakehall, 1 Corbray, 1 Hightower and 1 Whent. Which makes all of the Whiteswords from Major houses. Evidently, the representation of minor houses and lowborns is much higher than that of the Great Houses and Major Houses.

              – Aegon
              Jun 11 at 6:50






            • 9





              Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. Also note that the decision to make Jaime a white sword to begin with was also very much political in nature.

              – JAD
              Jun 11 at 7:05







            3




            3





            "The candidate must not come from a too influential family" - source for this being a criterion in choosing? As you mention, there are quite a number of exceptions. I see your reasoning for why it might be a good idea, but are you sure it actually was a conscious criterion?

            – Rand al'Thor
            Jun 11 at 6:27





            "The candidate must not come from a too influential family" - source for this being a criterion in choosing? As you mention, there are quite a number of exceptions. I see your reasoning for why it might be a good idea, but are you sure it actually was a conscious criterion?

            – Rand al'Thor
            Jun 11 at 6:27




            2




            2





            @Randal'Thor As I noted, The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, so it's delving into the realm of speculation really, not canon. We see 1 Velaryon, 1 Baratheon, 1 Tyrell, 1 Targaryen 1 Martell and 1 Lannister in all history of KG which basically makes all the Great Houses that ever had a son wear the white cloak. (Velaryons added by virtue of being the 2nd house of the realm during most of Targ era).

            – Aegon
            Jun 11 at 6:48





            @Randal'Thor As I noted, The criteria over the years for picking Kingsguards seems to be, judging by the common traits, so it's delving into the realm of speculation really, not canon. We see 1 Velaryon, 1 Baratheon, 1 Tyrell, 1 Targaryen 1 Martell and 1 Lannister in all history of KG which basically makes all the Great Houses that ever had a son wear the white cloak. (Velaryons added by virtue of being the 2nd house of the realm during most of Targ era).

            – Aegon
            Jun 11 at 6:48




            2




            2





            In Major houses we see 2 Darry, 7 Darklyns, 1 Bracken, 1 Strong, 1 Redwyne, 1 Marbrand, 1 Peake, 2 Oakhearts, 1 Crakehall, 1 Corbray, 1 Hightower and 1 Whent. Which makes all of the Whiteswords from Major houses. Evidently, the representation of minor houses and lowborns is much higher than that of the Great Houses and Major Houses.

            – Aegon
            Jun 11 at 6:50





            In Major houses we see 2 Darry, 7 Darklyns, 1 Bracken, 1 Strong, 1 Redwyne, 1 Marbrand, 1 Peake, 2 Oakhearts, 1 Crakehall, 1 Corbray, 1 Hightower and 1 Whent. Which makes all of the Whiteswords from Major houses. Evidently, the representation of minor houses and lowborns is much higher than that of the Great Houses and Major Houses.

            – Aegon
            Jun 11 at 6:50




            9




            9





            Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. Also note that the decision to make Jaime a white sword to begin with was also very much political in nature.

            – JAD
            Jun 11 at 7:05





            Jaime Lannister, presumably pardoned to bind Lord Tywin to Robert's cause. Also note that the decision to make Jaime a white sword to begin with was also very much political in nature.

            – JAD
            Jun 11 at 7:05











            5














            There are counterarguments to some of the listed men though.




            1. Ser Barristan Selmy



            First of all, it makes little sense for Robert B to punish someone for (surprisingly) bending the knee to him.



            But in my opinion more importantly, Selmy was well aware of what the Mad King had become, and has always been portrayed as someone who understand honor rather than abiding by rules he doesn't understand (quite similar to Ned).



            It's this character trait that ends up getting him exiled (pretty much voluntarily) as he stood up for what he believed was the right thing to do. If Selmy at some point sees Aerys' madness and is convinced that he's a danger to the realm, then Selmy is going to act on his conscience more than his oath.



            This makes Barristan capable of understanding that an oath sworn to a king who turns on his own people is effectively invalidated. Selmy swore an oath to protect his king to the death, but when Aerys stops being regnal, you can argue that Selmy's oath no longer applies either.




            1. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.



            Same argument as Barristan, but even more poignant because Jaime stopped the Mad King.



            Jaime was also a renowned swordsman. Being a Kingsguard doesn't just require honor, it requires actual skill in combat, of which Jaime had plenty.



            You have to understand that "kingslaying" is only a crime to those who still considered Aerys a rightful king. Robert very much utilized the demonization of Aerys' madness to justify his rebellion.

            Robert can't then punish Jaime for killing Aerys while Robert himself was trying to kill Aerys. And even if he could, why would he want to?




            1. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil.



            Notice how much of that description fits Robert B to a tee. People are usually blind to their own traits, and that extends to people who are like them.




            1. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable



            The same applies to the Mountain and (at that time) the Hound. The Cleganes have a clear purpose: they are deterrents. I have little good to say about ruling through fear and savagery, but it does keep people in line.



            Think of it as good cop (e.g. Selmy)/bad cop (Moore). Every criminal tends to start liking one over the other and opening up (or yielding) to them. Different people yield to good knight/bad knight differently.




            we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.




            One man's eager abuser is another man's deeply loyal servant who immediately obeys a command. I can spin this to use it as proof of loyalty to the king.




            1. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but...



            Robert's reign was peaceful, but it was taken by violence. His initial reign was shaky and under possibly counterattack from Targaryen loyalists. It makes sense for Robert to favor swordsmen (loyal to him) over (pure) honorable men as his personal bodyguards.




            I do agree on the other mentions, but most Kingsguard had sufficiently valid credentials for Robert to consider giving them the white cloak.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              The overarching point is that most of these are not those that you would trust with your life to protect you... the whole point of the Kingsguard. Your argument does little to convince otherwise that these would protect the king with their lives when it comes down to it.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:22






            • 1





              @TheLethalCarrot: My opinion doesn't matter. Robert's does. I agree that the KG lineup was a bunch of bad choices, but that doesn't mean that Robert knowingly made bad choices. He's a flawed human with flawed reasoning (like pretty much everyone), but that doesn't mean he didn't have some reasons (even if misguided) about who to make his KG. Repurposing OP's quote to apply to Robert: "Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil." Even flawed men have their reasons.

              – Flater
              Jun 11 at 10:25







            • 1





              @Flater And I think you're not giving Robert enough credit, he might not be the wisest or cleverest man but he's smarter than you're interpreting him to be.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:29






            • 1





              @TheLethalCarrot: I'm not sure how that factors into the answer. If you argue that he's smarter than the KG choices he made, does that mean you're arguing he knowingly appointed a worse KG than he could've had? Because that would need elaboration in an answer of its own as to what his ulterior motives were.

              – Flater
              Jun 11 at 10:32







            • 3





              @Flater As Aeg's answer states maybe he wanted to appoint better Kingsguard but they refused and/or didn't want to join. If these were his first choices, and you could prove that, my stance would change but as far as I know we don't have any information on whether or not he wanted to appoint others beforehand. And I'll leave the discussion there.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:35
















            5














            There are counterarguments to some of the listed men though.




            1. Ser Barristan Selmy



            First of all, it makes little sense for Robert B to punish someone for (surprisingly) bending the knee to him.



            But in my opinion more importantly, Selmy was well aware of what the Mad King had become, and has always been portrayed as someone who understand honor rather than abiding by rules he doesn't understand (quite similar to Ned).



            It's this character trait that ends up getting him exiled (pretty much voluntarily) as he stood up for what he believed was the right thing to do. If Selmy at some point sees Aerys' madness and is convinced that he's a danger to the realm, then Selmy is going to act on his conscience more than his oath.



            This makes Barristan capable of understanding that an oath sworn to a king who turns on his own people is effectively invalidated. Selmy swore an oath to protect his king to the death, but when Aerys stops being regnal, you can argue that Selmy's oath no longer applies either.




            1. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.



            Same argument as Barristan, but even more poignant because Jaime stopped the Mad King.



            Jaime was also a renowned swordsman. Being a Kingsguard doesn't just require honor, it requires actual skill in combat, of which Jaime had plenty.



            You have to understand that "kingslaying" is only a crime to those who still considered Aerys a rightful king. Robert very much utilized the demonization of Aerys' madness to justify his rebellion.

            Robert can't then punish Jaime for killing Aerys while Robert himself was trying to kill Aerys. And even if he could, why would he want to?




            1. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil.



            Notice how much of that description fits Robert B to a tee. People are usually blind to their own traits, and that extends to people who are like them.




            1. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable



            The same applies to the Mountain and (at that time) the Hound. The Cleganes have a clear purpose: they are deterrents. I have little good to say about ruling through fear and savagery, but it does keep people in line.



            Think of it as good cop (e.g. Selmy)/bad cop (Moore). Every criminal tends to start liking one over the other and opening up (or yielding) to them. Different people yield to good knight/bad knight differently.




            we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.




            One man's eager abuser is another man's deeply loyal servant who immediately obeys a command. I can spin this to use it as proof of loyalty to the king.




            1. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but...



            Robert's reign was peaceful, but it was taken by violence. His initial reign was shaky and under possibly counterattack from Targaryen loyalists. It makes sense for Robert to favor swordsmen (loyal to him) over (pure) honorable men as his personal bodyguards.




            I do agree on the other mentions, but most Kingsguard had sufficiently valid credentials for Robert to consider giving them the white cloak.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              The overarching point is that most of these are not those that you would trust with your life to protect you... the whole point of the Kingsguard. Your argument does little to convince otherwise that these would protect the king with their lives when it comes down to it.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:22






            • 1





              @TheLethalCarrot: My opinion doesn't matter. Robert's does. I agree that the KG lineup was a bunch of bad choices, but that doesn't mean that Robert knowingly made bad choices. He's a flawed human with flawed reasoning (like pretty much everyone), but that doesn't mean he didn't have some reasons (even if misguided) about who to make his KG. Repurposing OP's quote to apply to Robert: "Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil." Even flawed men have their reasons.

              – Flater
              Jun 11 at 10:25







            • 1





              @Flater And I think you're not giving Robert enough credit, he might not be the wisest or cleverest man but he's smarter than you're interpreting him to be.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:29






            • 1





              @TheLethalCarrot: I'm not sure how that factors into the answer. If you argue that he's smarter than the KG choices he made, does that mean you're arguing he knowingly appointed a worse KG than he could've had? Because that would need elaboration in an answer of its own as to what his ulterior motives were.

              – Flater
              Jun 11 at 10:32







            • 3





              @Flater As Aeg's answer states maybe he wanted to appoint better Kingsguard but they refused and/or didn't want to join. If these were his first choices, and you could prove that, my stance would change but as far as I know we don't have any information on whether or not he wanted to appoint others beforehand. And I'll leave the discussion there.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:35














            5












            5








            5







            There are counterarguments to some of the listed men though.




            1. Ser Barristan Selmy



            First of all, it makes little sense for Robert B to punish someone for (surprisingly) bending the knee to him.



            But in my opinion more importantly, Selmy was well aware of what the Mad King had become, and has always been portrayed as someone who understand honor rather than abiding by rules he doesn't understand (quite similar to Ned).



            It's this character trait that ends up getting him exiled (pretty much voluntarily) as he stood up for what he believed was the right thing to do. If Selmy at some point sees Aerys' madness and is convinced that he's a danger to the realm, then Selmy is going to act on his conscience more than his oath.



            This makes Barristan capable of understanding that an oath sworn to a king who turns on his own people is effectively invalidated. Selmy swore an oath to protect his king to the death, but when Aerys stops being regnal, you can argue that Selmy's oath no longer applies either.




            1. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.



            Same argument as Barristan, but even more poignant because Jaime stopped the Mad King.



            Jaime was also a renowned swordsman. Being a Kingsguard doesn't just require honor, it requires actual skill in combat, of which Jaime had plenty.



            You have to understand that "kingslaying" is only a crime to those who still considered Aerys a rightful king. Robert very much utilized the demonization of Aerys' madness to justify his rebellion.

            Robert can't then punish Jaime for killing Aerys while Robert himself was trying to kill Aerys. And even if he could, why would he want to?




            1. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil.



            Notice how much of that description fits Robert B to a tee. People are usually blind to their own traits, and that extends to people who are like them.




            1. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable



            The same applies to the Mountain and (at that time) the Hound. The Cleganes have a clear purpose: they are deterrents. I have little good to say about ruling through fear and savagery, but it does keep people in line.



            Think of it as good cop (e.g. Selmy)/bad cop (Moore). Every criminal tends to start liking one over the other and opening up (or yielding) to them. Different people yield to good knight/bad knight differently.




            we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.




            One man's eager abuser is another man's deeply loyal servant who immediately obeys a command. I can spin this to use it as proof of loyalty to the king.




            1. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but...



            Robert's reign was peaceful, but it was taken by violence. His initial reign was shaky and under possibly counterattack from Targaryen loyalists. It makes sense for Robert to favor swordsmen (loyal to him) over (pure) honorable men as his personal bodyguards.




            I do agree on the other mentions, but most Kingsguard had sufficiently valid credentials for Robert to consider giving them the white cloak.






            share|improve this answer















            There are counterarguments to some of the listed men though.




            1. Ser Barristan Selmy



            First of all, it makes little sense for Robert B to punish someone for (surprisingly) bending the knee to him.



            But in my opinion more importantly, Selmy was well aware of what the Mad King had become, and has always been portrayed as someone who understand honor rather than abiding by rules he doesn't understand (quite similar to Ned).



            It's this character trait that ends up getting him exiled (pretty much voluntarily) as he stood up for what he believed was the right thing to do. If Selmy at some point sees Aerys' madness and is convinced that he's a danger to the realm, then Selmy is going to act on his conscience more than his oath.



            This makes Barristan capable of understanding that an oath sworn to a king who turns on his own people is effectively invalidated. Selmy swore an oath to protect his king to the death, but when Aerys stops being regnal, you can argue that Selmy's oath no longer applies either.




            1. Ser Jaime Lannister - The worst Kingsguard ever on face-value. He slew his King and took Robert's pardon, just like Selmy.



            Same argument as Barristan, but even more poignant because Jaime stopped the Mad King.



            Jaime was also a renowned swordsman. Being a Kingsguard doesn't just require honor, it requires actual skill in combat, of which Jaime had plenty.



            You have to understand that "kingslaying" is only a crime to those who still considered Aerys a rightful king. Robert very much utilized the demonization of Aerys' madness to justify his rebellion.

            Robert can't then punish Jaime for killing Aerys while Robert himself was trying to kill Aerys. And even if he could, why would he want to?




            1. Ser Arys Oakheart - Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil.



            Notice how much of that description fits Robert B to a tee. People are usually blind to their own traits, and that extends to people who are like them.




            1. Ser Mandon Moore - Although a most puissant knight, he was known to be a bit psychotic, robotic and dishonourable



            The same applies to the Mountain and (at that time) the Hound. The Cleganes have a clear purpose: they are deterrents. I have little good to say about ruling through fear and savagery, but it does keep people in line.



            Think of it as good cop (e.g. Selmy)/bad cop (Moore). Every criminal tends to start liking one over the other and opening up (or yielding) to them. Different people yield to good knight/bad knight differently.




            we see him in the affair of Joff ordering KG to beat Sansa up. Ser Arys at least objected before hitting her, Mandon Moore needed no pressure at all.




            One man's eager abuser is another man's deeply loyal servant who immediately obeys a command. I can spin this to use it as proof of loyalty to the king.




            1. Ser Preston Greenfield - Seems to be somewhat gifted with the sword but...



            Robert's reign was peaceful, but it was taken by violence. His initial reign was shaky and under possibly counterattack from Targaryen loyalists. It makes sense for Robert to favor swordsmen (loyal to him) over (pure) honorable men as his personal bodyguards.




            I do agree on the other mentions, but most Kingsguard had sufficiently valid credentials for Robert to consider giving them the white cloak.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jun 12 at 13:17

























            answered Jun 11 at 9:46









            FlaterFlater

            7,35112230




            7,35112230







            • 1





              The overarching point is that most of these are not those that you would trust with your life to protect you... the whole point of the Kingsguard. Your argument does little to convince otherwise that these would protect the king with their lives when it comes down to it.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:22






            • 1





              @TheLethalCarrot: My opinion doesn't matter. Robert's does. I agree that the KG lineup was a bunch of bad choices, but that doesn't mean that Robert knowingly made bad choices. He's a flawed human with flawed reasoning (like pretty much everyone), but that doesn't mean he didn't have some reasons (even if misguided) about who to make his KG. Repurposing OP's quote to apply to Robert: "Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil." Even flawed men have their reasons.

              – Flater
              Jun 11 at 10:25







            • 1





              @Flater And I think you're not giving Robert enough credit, he might not be the wisest or cleverest man but he's smarter than you're interpreting him to be.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:29






            • 1





              @TheLethalCarrot: I'm not sure how that factors into the answer. If you argue that he's smarter than the KG choices he made, does that mean you're arguing he knowingly appointed a worse KG than he could've had? Because that would need elaboration in an answer of its own as to what his ulterior motives were.

              – Flater
              Jun 11 at 10:32







            • 3





              @Flater As Aeg's answer states maybe he wanted to appoint better Kingsguard but they refused and/or didn't want to join. If these were his first choices, and you could prove that, my stance would change but as far as I know we don't have any information on whether or not he wanted to appoint others beforehand. And I'll leave the discussion there.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:35













            • 1





              The overarching point is that most of these are not those that you would trust with your life to protect you... the whole point of the Kingsguard. Your argument does little to convince otherwise that these would protect the king with their lives when it comes down to it.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:22






            • 1





              @TheLethalCarrot: My opinion doesn't matter. Robert's does. I agree that the KG lineup was a bunch of bad choices, but that doesn't mean that Robert knowingly made bad choices. He's a flawed human with flawed reasoning (like pretty much everyone), but that doesn't mean he didn't have some reasons (even if misguided) about who to make his KG. Repurposing OP's quote to apply to Robert: "Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil." Even flawed men have their reasons.

              – Flater
              Jun 11 at 10:25







            • 1





              @Flater And I think you're not giving Robert enough credit, he might not be the wisest or cleverest man but he's smarter than you're interpreting him to be.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:29






            • 1





              @TheLethalCarrot: I'm not sure how that factors into the answer. If you argue that he's smarter than the KG choices he made, does that mean you're arguing he knowingly appointed a worse KG than he could've had? Because that would need elaboration in an answer of its own as to what his ulterior motives were.

              – Flater
              Jun 11 at 10:32







            • 3





              @Flater As Aeg's answer states maybe he wanted to appoint better Kingsguard but they refused and/or didn't want to join. If these were his first choices, and you could prove that, my stance would change but as far as I know we don't have any information on whether or not he wanted to appoint others beforehand. And I'll leave the discussion there.

              – TheLethalCarrot
              Jun 11 at 10:35








            1




            1





            The overarching point is that most of these are not those that you would trust with your life to protect you... the whole point of the Kingsguard. Your argument does little to convince otherwise that these would protect the king with their lives when it comes down to it.

            – TheLethalCarrot
            Jun 11 at 10:22





            The overarching point is that most of these are not those that you would trust with your life to protect you... the whole point of the Kingsguard. Your argument does little to convince otherwise that these would protect the king with their lives when it comes down to it.

            – TheLethalCarrot
            Jun 11 at 10:22




            1




            1





            @TheLethalCarrot: My opinion doesn't matter. Robert's does. I agree that the KG lineup was a bunch of bad choices, but that doesn't mean that Robert knowingly made bad choices. He's a flawed human with flawed reasoning (like pretty much everyone), but that doesn't mean he didn't have some reasons (even if misguided) about who to make his KG. Repurposing OP's quote to apply to Robert: "Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil." Even flawed men have their reasons.

            – Flater
            Jun 11 at 10:25






            @TheLethalCarrot: My opinion doesn't matter. Robert's does. I agree that the KG lineup was a bunch of bad choices, but that doesn't mean that Robert knowingly made bad choices. He's a flawed human with flawed reasoning (like pretty much everyone), but that doesn't mean he didn't have some reasons (even if misguided) about who to make his KG. Repurposing OP's quote to apply to Robert: "Although well-meaning and not without some honour, he was weak-willed and we often see him dishonouring himself, although at least he shows some resistance to evil." Even flawed men have their reasons.

            – Flater
            Jun 11 at 10:25





            1




            1





            @Flater And I think you're not giving Robert enough credit, he might not be the wisest or cleverest man but he's smarter than you're interpreting him to be.

            – TheLethalCarrot
            Jun 11 at 10:29





            @Flater And I think you're not giving Robert enough credit, he might not be the wisest or cleverest man but he's smarter than you're interpreting him to be.

            – TheLethalCarrot
            Jun 11 at 10:29




            1




            1





            @TheLethalCarrot: I'm not sure how that factors into the answer. If you argue that he's smarter than the KG choices he made, does that mean you're arguing he knowingly appointed a worse KG than he could've had? Because that would need elaboration in an answer of its own as to what his ulterior motives were.

            – Flater
            Jun 11 at 10:32






            @TheLethalCarrot: I'm not sure how that factors into the answer. If you argue that he's smarter than the KG choices he made, does that mean you're arguing he knowingly appointed a worse KG than he could've had? Because that would need elaboration in an answer of its own as to what his ulterior motives were.

            – Flater
            Jun 11 at 10:32





            3




            3





            @Flater As Aeg's answer states maybe he wanted to appoint better Kingsguard but they refused and/or didn't want to join. If these were his first choices, and you could prove that, my stance would change but as far as I know we don't have any information on whether or not he wanted to appoint others beforehand. And I'll leave the discussion there.

            – TheLethalCarrot
            Jun 11 at 10:35






            @Flater As Aeg's answer states maybe he wanted to appoint better Kingsguard but they refused and/or didn't want to join. If these were his first choices, and you could prove that, my stance would change but as far as I know we don't have any information on whether or not he wanted to appoint others beforehand. And I'll leave the discussion there.

            – TheLethalCarrot
            Jun 11 at 10:35


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f214234%2fwhy-did-robert-pick-unworthy-men-for-the-white-cloaks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?