What would be so wrong with using ATV preventative tire sealant in a street car?Repairing a motorcycle tire puncture. With heat or without heat?What are the side effects of using the wrong tires?What are the consequences of using an expired tire?Would using tires that are slightly smaller cause problems?What to do about 1 tire mounted on rim in wrong direction?What is wrong with tyreHow to know the tire pressure of my car?Tire pressure with tires on vs off the carHow much tire pressure with bigger tires?When buying a new tire at car shop, they pumped the new tire and it popped loudly, is that normal?
Is it possible to access the complete command line including pipes in a bash script?
Considerations when providing money to one child now, and the other later?
Is it OK to accept a job opportunity while planning on not taking it?
German phrase for 'suited and booted'
How am I supposed to put out fires?
What is an expert set in the fonts field?
What rules turn any attack that hits a given target into a critical hit?
Are gangsters hired to attack people at a train station classified as a terrorist attack?
On the history of Haar measure
Does switching on an old games console without a cartridge damage it?
Character Arcs - What if the character doesn't overcome the big lie, flaws or wounds?
Pgfplots fillbetween and Tikz shade
Is it ethical to tell my teaching assistant that I like him?
Does quantity of data extensions impact performance?
Why is DC so, so, so Democratic?
"It is what it is" in French
Has Peter Parker ever eaten bugs?
Does Impedance Matching Imply any Practical RF Transmitter Must Waste >=50% of Energy?
How can I deal with someone that wants to kill something that isn't supposed to be killed?
What is a "staved" town, like in "Staverton"?
My current job follows "worst practices". How can I talk about my experience in an interview without giving off red flags?
5V/12V load balance of 3.5'' HDD?
Pass USB 3.0 connection through D-SUB connector
Why do people say "I am broke" instead of "I am broken"?
What would be so wrong with using ATV preventative tire sealant in a street car?
Repairing a motorcycle tire puncture. With heat or without heat?What are the side effects of using the wrong tires?What are the consequences of using an expired tire?Would using tires that are slightly smaller cause problems?What to do about 1 tire mounted on rim in wrong direction?What is wrong with tyreHow to know the tire pressure of my car?Tire pressure with tires on vs off the carHow much tire pressure with bigger tires?When buying a new tire at car shop, they pumped the new tire and it popped loudly, is that normal?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I've been looking for a type of tire sealant like Tireject/Slime that will prevent flats, not the emergency repair kind. Both of these companies sell the preventative goop, but they specifically state that they are only to be used on offroad vehicles like ATVs and farm equipment, not street cars.
With the given that any damage that happens at highway speeds probably can't be helped by goop, and still following the normal usage and replacement instructions, is there any reason the preventative products wouldn't work for normal driving purposes?
tires safety tire-pressure
add a comment |
I've been looking for a type of tire sealant like Tireject/Slime that will prevent flats, not the emergency repair kind. Both of these companies sell the preventative goop, but they specifically state that they are only to be used on offroad vehicles like ATVs and farm equipment, not street cars.
With the given that any damage that happens at highway speeds probably can't be helped by goop, and still following the normal usage and replacement instructions, is there any reason the preventative products wouldn't work for normal driving purposes?
tires safety tire-pressure
2
Even if your tire was still intact, having a big weight of sealant inside it (apparently Slime needs up to 32 ounces per tire - compare that with the size of a typical wheel balance weight) could screw up the wheel balancing to the extent of making the vehicle uncontrollable at normal road speeds. And an uncontrollable vehicle tends to kill other people as well as the fool trying to drive it.
– alephzero
Jul 13 at 22:57
The centripetal forces that stress a tire at 80 mph are massively higher than at 15 mph.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:34
add a comment |
I've been looking for a type of tire sealant like Tireject/Slime that will prevent flats, not the emergency repair kind. Both of these companies sell the preventative goop, but they specifically state that they are only to be used on offroad vehicles like ATVs and farm equipment, not street cars.
With the given that any damage that happens at highway speeds probably can't be helped by goop, and still following the normal usage and replacement instructions, is there any reason the preventative products wouldn't work for normal driving purposes?
tires safety tire-pressure
I've been looking for a type of tire sealant like Tireject/Slime that will prevent flats, not the emergency repair kind. Both of these companies sell the preventative goop, but they specifically state that they are only to be used on offroad vehicles like ATVs and farm equipment, not street cars.
With the given that any damage that happens at highway speeds probably can't be helped by goop, and still following the normal usage and replacement instructions, is there any reason the preventative products wouldn't work for normal driving purposes?
tires safety tire-pressure
tires safety tire-pressure
asked Jul 13 at 21:28
LafinJackLafinJack
183 bronze badges
183 bronze badges
2
Even if your tire was still intact, having a big weight of sealant inside it (apparently Slime needs up to 32 ounces per tire - compare that with the size of a typical wheel balance weight) could screw up the wheel balancing to the extent of making the vehicle uncontrollable at normal road speeds. And an uncontrollable vehicle tends to kill other people as well as the fool trying to drive it.
– alephzero
Jul 13 at 22:57
The centripetal forces that stress a tire at 80 mph are massively higher than at 15 mph.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:34
add a comment |
2
Even if your tire was still intact, having a big weight of sealant inside it (apparently Slime needs up to 32 ounces per tire - compare that with the size of a typical wheel balance weight) could screw up the wheel balancing to the extent of making the vehicle uncontrollable at normal road speeds. And an uncontrollable vehicle tends to kill other people as well as the fool trying to drive it.
– alephzero
Jul 13 at 22:57
The centripetal forces that stress a tire at 80 mph are massively higher than at 15 mph.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:34
2
2
Even if your tire was still intact, having a big weight of sealant inside it (apparently Slime needs up to 32 ounces per tire - compare that with the size of a typical wheel balance weight) could screw up the wheel balancing to the extent of making the vehicle uncontrollable at normal road speeds. And an uncontrollable vehicle tends to kill other people as well as the fool trying to drive it.
– alephzero
Jul 13 at 22:57
Even if your tire was still intact, having a big weight of sealant inside it (apparently Slime needs up to 32 ounces per tire - compare that with the size of a typical wheel balance weight) could screw up the wheel balancing to the extent of making the vehicle uncontrollable at normal road speeds. And an uncontrollable vehicle tends to kill other people as well as the fool trying to drive it.
– alephzero
Jul 13 at 22:57
The centripetal forces that stress a tire at 80 mph are massively higher than at 15 mph.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:34
The centripetal forces that stress a tire at 80 mph are massively higher than at 15 mph.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
For the product to provide long-term preventive sealing, it needs to remain in a fluid state. Driving a car on the highway with a tire full of liquid is dangerous.
Fix-a-flat style repairs are intended for emergency use only, just to get the car to a place where a real repair can be done, and usually are intended to solidify, not stay liquid. You're supposed to drive to a shop and get a plug or patch right away.
Other possible reasons for the difference:
The off-road sealant may have ingredients which could cause deterioration of the tire over the long term, something that might be acceptable for an off-road vehicle but not on the highway.
It could be a legal restriction, such as a chemical which is legal for off-road use, but not on highways, or some sort of tax or fee being included in the price of the on-road product, just as off-road diesel is cheaper due to not including taxes.
Most modern cars have some form of TPMS, and companies advertise their on-road products as TPMS-safe. I doubt the off-road goop has that assurance. Aside from TPMS, using a product not intended for highway use could void the warranty on your tires, or even affect the warranty on the car itself.
The whole idea of tire sealants for automotive use is that you use them as a temporary repair in an urgent situation just until you can get a proper plug or patch done.
The manufacturer also has to be careful of liability. If they don't state that the product is for off-road use only, and something bad happens on the highway as a result of their product, they're in trouble. At least this way they have the defense that the customer used the product incorrectly.
I strongly recommend you avoid using a preventive sealer for a street automobile.
The sealer either works or it doesn't.
If it works, you could get a hole and not even know it. Now you're driving on a tire that needs a repair, but you don't realize it. Your tire could be structurally unsound without you even realizing it, because it never leaks.
If it doesn't work, then you've still got a leak, but now you also have a mess, and the tire shop will be annoyed when they remove the tire and get that goop everywhere.
Interestingly, Michelin is now (2020) introducing this technology into wide production but you can count on them having done plenty of engineering and testing to validate it as being safe for on-road vehicles. 1 2
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:32
@whiskeychief, lining a tire with a sealant isn't a new concept, but Michelin's got a new twist. Most self-sealing is done by using liquids which flow into the holes, or soft substances that sqeeze together. Michelin is using new polyers which actually have the ability to form new bonds between surfaces. Basically, you cut it and it reconnects to itself, actually healing the cut, not just closing it up. Since it's built into the tire and is not a liquid, balance isn't an issue, and it's going to be very thoroughly tested before being accepted for street use. It's a far cry from Fix-A-Flat.
– barbecue
Jul 14 at 17:51
Correct correction! It is not “this” technology as I had said, you’re absolutely right.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 20:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "224"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmechanics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68902%2fwhat-would-be-so-wrong-with-using-atv-preventative-tire-sealant-in-a-street-car%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
For the product to provide long-term preventive sealing, it needs to remain in a fluid state. Driving a car on the highway with a tire full of liquid is dangerous.
Fix-a-flat style repairs are intended for emergency use only, just to get the car to a place where a real repair can be done, and usually are intended to solidify, not stay liquid. You're supposed to drive to a shop and get a plug or patch right away.
Other possible reasons for the difference:
The off-road sealant may have ingredients which could cause deterioration of the tire over the long term, something that might be acceptable for an off-road vehicle but not on the highway.
It could be a legal restriction, such as a chemical which is legal for off-road use, but not on highways, or some sort of tax or fee being included in the price of the on-road product, just as off-road diesel is cheaper due to not including taxes.
Most modern cars have some form of TPMS, and companies advertise their on-road products as TPMS-safe. I doubt the off-road goop has that assurance. Aside from TPMS, using a product not intended for highway use could void the warranty on your tires, or even affect the warranty on the car itself.
The whole idea of tire sealants for automotive use is that you use them as a temporary repair in an urgent situation just until you can get a proper plug or patch done.
The manufacturer also has to be careful of liability. If they don't state that the product is for off-road use only, and something bad happens on the highway as a result of their product, they're in trouble. At least this way they have the defense that the customer used the product incorrectly.
I strongly recommend you avoid using a preventive sealer for a street automobile.
The sealer either works or it doesn't.
If it works, you could get a hole and not even know it. Now you're driving on a tire that needs a repair, but you don't realize it. Your tire could be structurally unsound without you even realizing it, because it never leaks.
If it doesn't work, then you've still got a leak, but now you also have a mess, and the tire shop will be annoyed when they remove the tire and get that goop everywhere.
Interestingly, Michelin is now (2020) introducing this technology into wide production but you can count on them having done plenty of engineering and testing to validate it as being safe for on-road vehicles. 1 2
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:32
@whiskeychief, lining a tire with a sealant isn't a new concept, but Michelin's got a new twist. Most self-sealing is done by using liquids which flow into the holes, or soft substances that sqeeze together. Michelin is using new polyers which actually have the ability to form new bonds between surfaces. Basically, you cut it and it reconnects to itself, actually healing the cut, not just closing it up. Since it's built into the tire and is not a liquid, balance isn't an issue, and it's going to be very thoroughly tested before being accepted for street use. It's a far cry from Fix-A-Flat.
– barbecue
Jul 14 at 17:51
Correct correction! It is not “this” technology as I had said, you’re absolutely right.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 20:07
add a comment |
For the product to provide long-term preventive sealing, it needs to remain in a fluid state. Driving a car on the highway with a tire full of liquid is dangerous.
Fix-a-flat style repairs are intended for emergency use only, just to get the car to a place where a real repair can be done, and usually are intended to solidify, not stay liquid. You're supposed to drive to a shop and get a plug or patch right away.
Other possible reasons for the difference:
The off-road sealant may have ingredients which could cause deterioration of the tire over the long term, something that might be acceptable for an off-road vehicle but not on the highway.
It could be a legal restriction, such as a chemical which is legal for off-road use, but not on highways, or some sort of tax or fee being included in the price of the on-road product, just as off-road diesel is cheaper due to not including taxes.
Most modern cars have some form of TPMS, and companies advertise their on-road products as TPMS-safe. I doubt the off-road goop has that assurance. Aside from TPMS, using a product not intended for highway use could void the warranty on your tires, or even affect the warranty on the car itself.
The whole idea of tire sealants for automotive use is that you use them as a temporary repair in an urgent situation just until you can get a proper plug or patch done.
The manufacturer also has to be careful of liability. If they don't state that the product is for off-road use only, and something bad happens on the highway as a result of their product, they're in trouble. At least this way they have the defense that the customer used the product incorrectly.
I strongly recommend you avoid using a preventive sealer for a street automobile.
The sealer either works or it doesn't.
If it works, you could get a hole and not even know it. Now you're driving on a tire that needs a repair, but you don't realize it. Your tire could be structurally unsound without you even realizing it, because it never leaks.
If it doesn't work, then you've still got a leak, but now you also have a mess, and the tire shop will be annoyed when they remove the tire and get that goop everywhere.
Interestingly, Michelin is now (2020) introducing this technology into wide production but you can count on them having done plenty of engineering and testing to validate it as being safe for on-road vehicles. 1 2
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:32
@whiskeychief, lining a tire with a sealant isn't a new concept, but Michelin's got a new twist. Most self-sealing is done by using liquids which flow into the holes, or soft substances that sqeeze together. Michelin is using new polyers which actually have the ability to form new bonds between surfaces. Basically, you cut it and it reconnects to itself, actually healing the cut, not just closing it up. Since it's built into the tire and is not a liquid, balance isn't an issue, and it's going to be very thoroughly tested before being accepted for street use. It's a far cry from Fix-A-Flat.
– barbecue
Jul 14 at 17:51
Correct correction! It is not “this” technology as I had said, you’re absolutely right.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 20:07
add a comment |
For the product to provide long-term preventive sealing, it needs to remain in a fluid state. Driving a car on the highway with a tire full of liquid is dangerous.
Fix-a-flat style repairs are intended for emergency use only, just to get the car to a place where a real repair can be done, and usually are intended to solidify, not stay liquid. You're supposed to drive to a shop and get a plug or patch right away.
Other possible reasons for the difference:
The off-road sealant may have ingredients which could cause deterioration of the tire over the long term, something that might be acceptable for an off-road vehicle but not on the highway.
It could be a legal restriction, such as a chemical which is legal for off-road use, but not on highways, or some sort of tax or fee being included in the price of the on-road product, just as off-road diesel is cheaper due to not including taxes.
Most modern cars have some form of TPMS, and companies advertise their on-road products as TPMS-safe. I doubt the off-road goop has that assurance. Aside from TPMS, using a product not intended for highway use could void the warranty on your tires, or even affect the warranty on the car itself.
The whole idea of tire sealants for automotive use is that you use them as a temporary repair in an urgent situation just until you can get a proper plug or patch done.
The manufacturer also has to be careful of liability. If they don't state that the product is for off-road use only, and something bad happens on the highway as a result of their product, they're in trouble. At least this way they have the defense that the customer used the product incorrectly.
I strongly recommend you avoid using a preventive sealer for a street automobile.
The sealer either works or it doesn't.
If it works, you could get a hole and not even know it. Now you're driving on a tire that needs a repair, but you don't realize it. Your tire could be structurally unsound without you even realizing it, because it never leaks.
If it doesn't work, then you've still got a leak, but now you also have a mess, and the tire shop will be annoyed when they remove the tire and get that goop everywhere.
For the product to provide long-term preventive sealing, it needs to remain in a fluid state. Driving a car on the highway with a tire full of liquid is dangerous.
Fix-a-flat style repairs are intended for emergency use only, just to get the car to a place where a real repair can be done, and usually are intended to solidify, not stay liquid. You're supposed to drive to a shop and get a plug or patch right away.
Other possible reasons for the difference:
The off-road sealant may have ingredients which could cause deterioration of the tire over the long term, something that might be acceptable for an off-road vehicle but not on the highway.
It could be a legal restriction, such as a chemical which is legal for off-road use, but not on highways, or some sort of tax or fee being included in the price of the on-road product, just as off-road diesel is cheaper due to not including taxes.
Most modern cars have some form of TPMS, and companies advertise their on-road products as TPMS-safe. I doubt the off-road goop has that assurance. Aside from TPMS, using a product not intended for highway use could void the warranty on your tires, or even affect the warranty on the car itself.
The whole idea of tire sealants for automotive use is that you use them as a temporary repair in an urgent situation just until you can get a proper plug or patch done.
The manufacturer also has to be careful of liability. If they don't state that the product is for off-road use only, and something bad happens on the highway as a result of their product, they're in trouble. At least this way they have the defense that the customer used the product incorrectly.
I strongly recommend you avoid using a preventive sealer for a street automobile.
The sealer either works or it doesn't.
If it works, you could get a hole and not even know it. Now you're driving on a tire that needs a repair, but you don't realize it. Your tire could be structurally unsound without you even realizing it, because it never leaks.
If it doesn't work, then you've still got a leak, but now you also have a mess, and the tire shop will be annoyed when they remove the tire and get that goop everywhere.
answered Jul 14 at 2:14
barbecuebarbecue
1,2977 silver badges17 bronze badges
1,2977 silver badges17 bronze badges
Interestingly, Michelin is now (2020) introducing this technology into wide production but you can count on them having done plenty of engineering and testing to validate it as being safe for on-road vehicles. 1 2
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:32
@whiskeychief, lining a tire with a sealant isn't a new concept, but Michelin's got a new twist. Most self-sealing is done by using liquids which flow into the holes, or soft substances that sqeeze together. Michelin is using new polyers which actually have the ability to form new bonds between surfaces. Basically, you cut it and it reconnects to itself, actually healing the cut, not just closing it up. Since it's built into the tire and is not a liquid, balance isn't an issue, and it's going to be very thoroughly tested before being accepted for street use. It's a far cry from Fix-A-Flat.
– barbecue
Jul 14 at 17:51
Correct correction! It is not “this” technology as I had said, you’re absolutely right.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 20:07
add a comment |
Interestingly, Michelin is now (2020) introducing this technology into wide production but you can count on them having done plenty of engineering and testing to validate it as being safe for on-road vehicles. 1 2
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:32
@whiskeychief, lining a tire with a sealant isn't a new concept, but Michelin's got a new twist. Most self-sealing is done by using liquids which flow into the holes, or soft substances that sqeeze together. Michelin is using new polyers which actually have the ability to form new bonds between surfaces. Basically, you cut it and it reconnects to itself, actually healing the cut, not just closing it up. Since it's built into the tire and is not a liquid, balance isn't an issue, and it's going to be very thoroughly tested before being accepted for street use. It's a far cry from Fix-A-Flat.
– barbecue
Jul 14 at 17:51
Correct correction! It is not “this” technology as I had said, you’re absolutely right.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 20:07
Interestingly, Michelin is now (2020) introducing this technology into wide production but you can count on them having done plenty of engineering and testing to validate it as being safe for on-road vehicles. 1 2
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:32
Interestingly, Michelin is now (2020) introducing this technology into wide production but you can count on them having done plenty of engineering and testing to validate it as being safe for on-road vehicles. 1 2
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:32
@whiskeychief, lining a tire with a sealant isn't a new concept, but Michelin's got a new twist. Most self-sealing is done by using liquids which flow into the holes, or soft substances that sqeeze together. Michelin is using new polyers which actually have the ability to form new bonds between surfaces. Basically, you cut it and it reconnects to itself, actually healing the cut, not just closing it up. Since it's built into the tire and is not a liquid, balance isn't an issue, and it's going to be very thoroughly tested before being accepted for street use. It's a far cry from Fix-A-Flat.
– barbecue
Jul 14 at 17:51
@whiskeychief, lining a tire with a sealant isn't a new concept, but Michelin's got a new twist. Most self-sealing is done by using liquids which flow into the holes, or soft substances that sqeeze together. Michelin is using new polyers which actually have the ability to form new bonds between surfaces. Basically, you cut it and it reconnects to itself, actually healing the cut, not just closing it up. Since it's built into the tire and is not a liquid, balance isn't an issue, and it's going to be very thoroughly tested before being accepted for street use. It's a far cry from Fix-A-Flat.
– barbecue
Jul 14 at 17:51
Correct correction! It is not “this” technology as I had said, you’re absolutely right.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 20:07
Correct correction! It is not “this” technology as I had said, you’re absolutely right.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 20:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Motor Vehicle Maintenance & Repair Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmechanics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68902%2fwhat-would-be-so-wrong-with-using-atv-preventative-tire-sealant-in-a-street-car%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Even if your tire was still intact, having a big weight of sealant inside it (apparently Slime needs up to 32 ounces per tire - compare that with the size of a typical wheel balance weight) could screw up the wheel balancing to the extent of making the vehicle uncontrollable at normal road speeds. And an uncontrollable vehicle tends to kill other people as well as the fool trying to drive it.
– alephzero
Jul 13 at 22:57
The centripetal forces that stress a tire at 80 mph are massively higher than at 15 mph.
– whiskeychief
Jul 14 at 11:34