Creating DarknessLighting circuit without metalCreating a scientifically semi-valid super-soldier, part 8: CommunicationDetermining the energy efficiency of a Light WandWhat kind of fuel would spaceships capable of faster-than-light travel use?The Complicated Nature of PhotokinesisMost useful material properties for building tsunami-resistant submersible buildings? (Magical material engineering)How would organisms adapt to survive darkness beasts? [expansion to my old question]Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleumCan there be substantial darkness?In what ways would the earth's orbit/atmosphere/ocean currents have to be different in order to create summer with long nights?
Can I enter a rental property without giving notice if I'm afraid a tenant may be hurt?
Why am I not getting stuck in the loop
Writing computer program code for free in an interview?
Identify Batman without getting caught
Purchased new computer from DELL with pre-installed Ubuntu. Won't boot. Should assume its an error from DELL?
Launch capabilities of GSLV Mark III
Is there a way to prevent the production team from messing up my paper?
Premier League simulation
Based on what criteria do you add/not add icons to labels within a toolbar?
How to realistically deal with a shield user?
The Game of the Century - why didn't Byrne take the rook after he forked Fischer?
What filaments allow air to pass but not water vapor?
Does a 4 bladed prop have almost twice the thrust of a 2 bladed prop?
Why is the Vasa Museum in Stockholm so Popular?
Do some languages mention the top limit of a range first?
Plato and the knowledge of the forms
Why is Chromosome 1 called Chromosome 1?
How many years before enough atoms of your body are replaced to survive the sudden disappearance of the original body’s atoms?
Can a Hogwarts student refuse the Sorting Hat's decision?
Why do cheap flights with a layover get more expensive when you split them up into separate flights?
Changing Row Keys into Normal Rows
Is it double speak?
Probably terminated or laid off soon; confront or not?
Ancients don't give a full level?
Creating Darkness
Lighting circuit without metalCreating a scientifically semi-valid super-soldier, part 8: CommunicationDetermining the energy efficiency of a Light WandWhat kind of fuel would spaceships capable of faster-than-light travel use?The Complicated Nature of PhotokinesisMost useful material properties for building tsunami-resistant submersible buildings? (Magical material engineering)How would organisms adapt to survive darkness beasts? [expansion to my old question]Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleumCan there be substantial darkness?In what ways would the earth's orbit/atmosphere/ocean currents have to be different in order to create summer with long nights?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Can we create any electrical equipment which works in the opposite way to a bulb, such that is whilst it is switched on all the light in the surrounding area gets absorbed creating darkness?
science-based light
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can we create any electrical equipment which works in the opposite way to a bulb, such that is whilst it is switched on all the light in the surrounding area gets absorbed creating darkness?
science-based light
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to worldbuilding. I think you should better define what you are looking for: an electrically actuated black curtain can do what you ask, but I suspect it's not in your scope.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jul 26 at 10:42
1
$begingroup$
I've editted your question to slightly improve the english; hopefully I haven't changed anything else important. Short answer though, "no".
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Jul 26 at 10:44
$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime thanx
$endgroup$
– abhilash
Jul 26 at 11:04
$begingroup$
FWIW, there are a couple hilarious articles on the subject of "Darkons" written by Bell Labs researchers. Google them for some fun.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:14
$begingroup$
Welcome abhilash. Please check out our tour and help center. I added the tag light because your question is about removing it, so it seemed appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Jul 26 at 14:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can we create any electrical equipment which works in the opposite way to a bulb, such that is whilst it is switched on all the light in the surrounding area gets absorbed creating darkness?
science-based light
$endgroup$
Can we create any electrical equipment which works in the opposite way to a bulb, such that is whilst it is switched on all the light in the surrounding area gets absorbed creating darkness?
science-based light
science-based light
edited Jul 26 at 14:38
Cyn
18.2k2 gold badges36 silver badges83 bronze badges
18.2k2 gold badges36 silver badges83 bronze badges
asked Jul 26 at 10:12
abhilashabhilash
311 bronze badge
311 bronze badge
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to worldbuilding. I think you should better define what you are looking for: an electrically actuated black curtain can do what you ask, but I suspect it's not in your scope.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jul 26 at 10:42
1
$begingroup$
I've editted your question to slightly improve the english; hopefully I haven't changed anything else important. Short answer though, "no".
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Jul 26 at 10:44
$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime thanx
$endgroup$
– abhilash
Jul 26 at 11:04
$begingroup$
FWIW, there are a couple hilarious articles on the subject of "Darkons" written by Bell Labs researchers. Google them for some fun.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:14
$begingroup$
Welcome abhilash. Please check out our tour and help center. I added the tag light because your question is about removing it, so it seemed appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Jul 26 at 14:39
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to worldbuilding. I think you should better define what you are looking for: an electrically actuated black curtain can do what you ask, but I suspect it's not in your scope.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jul 26 at 10:42
1
$begingroup$
I've editted your question to slightly improve the english; hopefully I haven't changed anything else important. Short answer though, "no".
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Jul 26 at 10:44
$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime thanx
$endgroup$
– abhilash
Jul 26 at 11:04
$begingroup$
FWIW, there are a couple hilarious articles on the subject of "Darkons" written by Bell Labs researchers. Google them for some fun.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:14
$begingroup$
Welcome abhilash. Please check out our tour and help center. I added the tag light because your question is about removing it, so it seemed appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Jul 26 at 14:39
1
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to worldbuilding. I think you should better define what you are looking for: an electrically actuated black curtain can do what you ask, but I suspect it's not in your scope.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jul 26 at 10:42
$begingroup$
Welcome to worldbuilding. I think you should better define what you are looking for: an electrically actuated black curtain can do what you ask, but I suspect it's not in your scope.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jul 26 at 10:42
1
1
$begingroup$
I've editted your question to slightly improve the english; hopefully I haven't changed anything else important. Short answer though, "no".
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Jul 26 at 10:44
$begingroup$
I've editted your question to slightly improve the english; hopefully I haven't changed anything else important. Short answer though, "no".
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Jul 26 at 10:44
$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime thanx
$endgroup$
– abhilash
Jul 26 at 11:04
$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime thanx
$endgroup$
– abhilash
Jul 26 at 11:04
$begingroup$
FWIW, there are a couple hilarious articles on the subject of "Darkons" written by Bell Labs researchers. Google them for some fun.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:14
$begingroup$
FWIW, there are a couple hilarious articles on the subject of "Darkons" written by Bell Labs researchers. Google them for some fun.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:14
$begingroup$
Welcome abhilash. Please check out our tour and help center. I added the tag light because your question is about removing it, so it seemed appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Jul 26 at 14:39
$begingroup$
Welcome abhilash. Please check out our tour and help center. I added the tag light because your question is about removing it, so it seemed appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Jul 26 at 14:39
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Maybe possible in theory, but not plausible with any foreseeable technology.
Light is a torrent of electromagnetic waves. Darkness is the absence of any such light waves.
You can cancel out a wave by creating a wave which is exactly identical but with the phase shifted by 180°. This is called "destructive interference". But there are a couple of problems with trying to cancel out a light source in a real-world scenario:
if your two wave emitters (light and "anti-light") are not in exactly the same location, then the interference only works in one spot at a time.
then there is the problem that light is usually not just a wave with one frequency but a combination of multiple waves with lots and lots of different frequencies and amplitudes (that's what defines the color of a light). If you want to cancel out a light source, you need to match all those frequencies.
And then there is the problem that in a regular lighted situation you don't have one light source but many different light sources as well as indirect light. So you don't have the same combination of light waves on every surface.
So you can not just have an anti-lightbulb which you can switch on anywhere and expect to work. You would have to know exactly which micro-meter of surface in the surrounding receives which light frequencies and then send out rays of light with exactly those waves so that they arrive phase-shifted by 180°. This would not just require a tremendous computing power but also the ability to emit billions of unique rays of light with an extremely fine precision.
If you want to prevent people from seeing something, then there are simpler methods.
- You can obstruct their view with smoke or fog.
- You can temporarily blind them with a strong flash of light.
- You can obstruct or disable any sources of light.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
light and anti-light Note that photons are their own antiparticle, "anti-light" is light.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 12:30
1
$begingroup$
Would a black hole work to "suck out" all the photons? I am aware that it would likely have rather catastrophic other side effects but I'm curious if it could still technically leave an area in darkness?
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jul 26 at 13:16
1
$begingroup$
@StephenG What I meant with "anti-light" in the answer wasn't a source of "anti-photons", but a light source which sends light waves which cancel out those of other lightsources. I am not sure how I could explain that better. But I am not sure if this is even necesary, because I didn't even mention photons in the answer.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jul 26 at 13:39
$begingroup$
I'm simply providing some physics clarification. Given the material on WB SE (including my own), I think it's very easy for the lay person reading answers to get confused on these things. You could technically say your source was a source of anti-photons - a photon and an anti-photon are the same thing. :-)
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 13:42
1
$begingroup$
I feel like this answer severely understates the impossibility of such a device. I think this device would be harder to get working than a device which could un-burn a piece of paper by recapturing all the exact gas, smoke, and ash atoms left over from burning and reassemble them to show you what was written on the paper.
$endgroup$
– Shufflepants
Jul 26 at 20:01
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
That already exists.
It's called a smoke bomb.

If you stick your head into it the smoke, you won't be able to see s... a thing.
If you make the smoke black, it will absorb visible light in all wavelengths. If you use vantablack, your absortion efficiency goes all the way to 99.96%.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
True, but it also has some potentially undesirable side effects...
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
Ironically you can get a similar effect (blind enemies) with a flashbang
$endgroup$
– jean
Jul 26 at 20:24
1
$begingroup$
Would there even be a discernable difference between creating darkness and a perfectly dark, smooth odorless smoke cloud that didn't dissipate? I guess the difference would be that it would persist after the electricity was removed and would take a perceptible amount of time to expand to it's maximum size.
$endgroup$
– Bill K
Jul 26 at 22:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Going laterally a bit here.
If all you need for your "darkness" is for people not to be able to see anything, then your device could generate some (unobtanium-based) E-M wave pattern which completely shuts down the optic nerve.
Obviously this will be useless if your intent is to stop hardware such as video cameras from recording information.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Based on answers above, two options:
High-tech smoke bomb, namely a cloud of nanobots that stay in a given area, fill the air in it evenly, are painted with Super-black paint. In fact, rather than microscopic nanobots, make them more like moths or floating flakes. Device coordinates nanobots and provides energy through induction: nanobots constantly circulate to the device to recharge, and then away from it to dim the furthest corners.
Brute force: device emits super-bright light that makes it impossible to see anything, by overwhelming both retinas in the eyes and sensors in cameras. Device will need a lot of energy, and a very efficient light bulb. Can make it a plot point that it does not last long.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although it's counter to every sci-fi show that I've ever seen, wouldn't a shield that blocks lasers also block physical light?
That would make it easy to turn on a shield emitter lightbulb and have it block all the light from entering an area. I'm not sure if it would stop light created in that area.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151663%2fcreating-darkness%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Maybe possible in theory, but not plausible with any foreseeable technology.
Light is a torrent of electromagnetic waves. Darkness is the absence of any such light waves.
You can cancel out a wave by creating a wave which is exactly identical but with the phase shifted by 180°. This is called "destructive interference". But there are a couple of problems with trying to cancel out a light source in a real-world scenario:
if your two wave emitters (light and "anti-light") are not in exactly the same location, then the interference only works in one spot at a time.
then there is the problem that light is usually not just a wave with one frequency but a combination of multiple waves with lots and lots of different frequencies and amplitudes (that's what defines the color of a light). If you want to cancel out a light source, you need to match all those frequencies.
And then there is the problem that in a regular lighted situation you don't have one light source but many different light sources as well as indirect light. So you don't have the same combination of light waves on every surface.
So you can not just have an anti-lightbulb which you can switch on anywhere and expect to work. You would have to know exactly which micro-meter of surface in the surrounding receives which light frequencies and then send out rays of light with exactly those waves so that they arrive phase-shifted by 180°. This would not just require a tremendous computing power but also the ability to emit billions of unique rays of light with an extremely fine precision.
If you want to prevent people from seeing something, then there are simpler methods.
- You can obstruct their view with smoke or fog.
- You can temporarily blind them with a strong flash of light.
- You can obstruct or disable any sources of light.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
light and anti-light Note that photons are their own antiparticle, "anti-light" is light.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 12:30
1
$begingroup$
Would a black hole work to "suck out" all the photons? I am aware that it would likely have rather catastrophic other side effects but I'm curious if it could still technically leave an area in darkness?
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jul 26 at 13:16
1
$begingroup$
@StephenG What I meant with "anti-light" in the answer wasn't a source of "anti-photons", but a light source which sends light waves which cancel out those of other lightsources. I am not sure how I could explain that better. But I am not sure if this is even necesary, because I didn't even mention photons in the answer.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jul 26 at 13:39
$begingroup$
I'm simply providing some physics clarification. Given the material on WB SE (including my own), I think it's very easy for the lay person reading answers to get confused on these things. You could technically say your source was a source of anti-photons - a photon and an anti-photon are the same thing. :-)
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 13:42
1
$begingroup$
I feel like this answer severely understates the impossibility of such a device. I think this device would be harder to get working than a device which could un-burn a piece of paper by recapturing all the exact gas, smoke, and ash atoms left over from burning and reassemble them to show you what was written on the paper.
$endgroup$
– Shufflepants
Jul 26 at 20:01
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Maybe possible in theory, but not plausible with any foreseeable technology.
Light is a torrent of electromagnetic waves. Darkness is the absence of any such light waves.
You can cancel out a wave by creating a wave which is exactly identical but with the phase shifted by 180°. This is called "destructive interference". But there are a couple of problems with trying to cancel out a light source in a real-world scenario:
if your two wave emitters (light and "anti-light") are not in exactly the same location, then the interference only works in one spot at a time.
then there is the problem that light is usually not just a wave with one frequency but a combination of multiple waves with lots and lots of different frequencies and amplitudes (that's what defines the color of a light). If you want to cancel out a light source, you need to match all those frequencies.
And then there is the problem that in a regular lighted situation you don't have one light source but many different light sources as well as indirect light. So you don't have the same combination of light waves on every surface.
So you can not just have an anti-lightbulb which you can switch on anywhere and expect to work. You would have to know exactly which micro-meter of surface in the surrounding receives which light frequencies and then send out rays of light with exactly those waves so that they arrive phase-shifted by 180°. This would not just require a tremendous computing power but also the ability to emit billions of unique rays of light with an extremely fine precision.
If you want to prevent people from seeing something, then there are simpler methods.
- You can obstruct their view with smoke or fog.
- You can temporarily blind them with a strong flash of light.
- You can obstruct or disable any sources of light.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
light and anti-light Note that photons are their own antiparticle, "anti-light" is light.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 12:30
1
$begingroup$
Would a black hole work to "suck out" all the photons? I am aware that it would likely have rather catastrophic other side effects but I'm curious if it could still technically leave an area in darkness?
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jul 26 at 13:16
1
$begingroup$
@StephenG What I meant with "anti-light" in the answer wasn't a source of "anti-photons", but a light source which sends light waves which cancel out those of other lightsources. I am not sure how I could explain that better. But I am not sure if this is even necesary, because I didn't even mention photons in the answer.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jul 26 at 13:39
$begingroup$
I'm simply providing some physics clarification. Given the material on WB SE (including my own), I think it's very easy for the lay person reading answers to get confused on these things. You could technically say your source was a source of anti-photons - a photon and an anti-photon are the same thing. :-)
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 13:42
1
$begingroup$
I feel like this answer severely understates the impossibility of such a device. I think this device would be harder to get working than a device which could un-burn a piece of paper by recapturing all the exact gas, smoke, and ash atoms left over from burning and reassemble them to show you what was written on the paper.
$endgroup$
– Shufflepants
Jul 26 at 20:01
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Maybe possible in theory, but not plausible with any foreseeable technology.
Light is a torrent of electromagnetic waves. Darkness is the absence of any such light waves.
You can cancel out a wave by creating a wave which is exactly identical but with the phase shifted by 180°. This is called "destructive interference". But there are a couple of problems with trying to cancel out a light source in a real-world scenario:
if your two wave emitters (light and "anti-light") are not in exactly the same location, then the interference only works in one spot at a time.
then there is the problem that light is usually not just a wave with one frequency but a combination of multiple waves with lots and lots of different frequencies and amplitudes (that's what defines the color of a light). If you want to cancel out a light source, you need to match all those frequencies.
And then there is the problem that in a regular lighted situation you don't have one light source but many different light sources as well as indirect light. So you don't have the same combination of light waves on every surface.
So you can not just have an anti-lightbulb which you can switch on anywhere and expect to work. You would have to know exactly which micro-meter of surface in the surrounding receives which light frequencies and then send out rays of light with exactly those waves so that they arrive phase-shifted by 180°. This would not just require a tremendous computing power but also the ability to emit billions of unique rays of light with an extremely fine precision.
If you want to prevent people from seeing something, then there are simpler methods.
- You can obstruct their view with smoke or fog.
- You can temporarily blind them with a strong flash of light.
- You can obstruct or disable any sources of light.
$endgroup$
Maybe possible in theory, but not plausible with any foreseeable technology.
Light is a torrent of electromagnetic waves. Darkness is the absence of any such light waves.
You can cancel out a wave by creating a wave which is exactly identical but with the phase shifted by 180°. This is called "destructive interference". But there are a couple of problems with trying to cancel out a light source in a real-world scenario:
if your two wave emitters (light and "anti-light") are not in exactly the same location, then the interference only works in one spot at a time.
then there is the problem that light is usually not just a wave with one frequency but a combination of multiple waves with lots and lots of different frequencies and amplitudes (that's what defines the color of a light). If you want to cancel out a light source, you need to match all those frequencies.
And then there is the problem that in a regular lighted situation you don't have one light source but many different light sources as well as indirect light. So you don't have the same combination of light waves on every surface.
So you can not just have an anti-lightbulb which you can switch on anywhere and expect to work. You would have to know exactly which micro-meter of surface in the surrounding receives which light frequencies and then send out rays of light with exactly those waves so that they arrive phase-shifted by 180°. This would not just require a tremendous computing power but also the ability to emit billions of unique rays of light with an extremely fine precision.
If you want to prevent people from seeing something, then there are simpler methods.
- You can obstruct their view with smoke or fog.
- You can temporarily blind them with a strong flash of light.
- You can obstruct or disable any sources of light.
edited Jul 26 at 13:37
answered Jul 26 at 11:09
PhilippPhilipp
32.8k12 gold badges68 silver badges126 bronze badges
32.8k12 gold badges68 silver badges126 bronze badges
$begingroup$
light and anti-light Note that photons are their own antiparticle, "anti-light" is light.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 12:30
1
$begingroup$
Would a black hole work to "suck out" all the photons? I am aware that it would likely have rather catastrophic other side effects but I'm curious if it could still technically leave an area in darkness?
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jul 26 at 13:16
1
$begingroup$
@StephenG What I meant with "anti-light" in the answer wasn't a source of "anti-photons", but a light source which sends light waves which cancel out those of other lightsources. I am not sure how I could explain that better. But I am not sure if this is even necesary, because I didn't even mention photons in the answer.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jul 26 at 13:39
$begingroup$
I'm simply providing some physics clarification. Given the material on WB SE (including my own), I think it's very easy for the lay person reading answers to get confused on these things. You could technically say your source was a source of anti-photons - a photon and an anti-photon are the same thing. :-)
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 13:42
1
$begingroup$
I feel like this answer severely understates the impossibility of such a device. I think this device would be harder to get working than a device which could un-burn a piece of paper by recapturing all the exact gas, smoke, and ash atoms left over from burning and reassemble them to show you what was written on the paper.
$endgroup$
– Shufflepants
Jul 26 at 20:01
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
light and anti-light Note that photons are their own antiparticle, "anti-light" is light.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 12:30
1
$begingroup$
Would a black hole work to "suck out" all the photons? I am aware that it would likely have rather catastrophic other side effects but I'm curious if it could still technically leave an area in darkness?
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jul 26 at 13:16
1
$begingroup$
@StephenG What I meant with "anti-light" in the answer wasn't a source of "anti-photons", but a light source which sends light waves which cancel out those of other lightsources. I am not sure how I could explain that better. But I am not sure if this is even necesary, because I didn't even mention photons in the answer.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jul 26 at 13:39
$begingroup$
I'm simply providing some physics clarification. Given the material on WB SE (including my own), I think it's very easy for the lay person reading answers to get confused on these things. You could technically say your source was a source of anti-photons - a photon and an anti-photon are the same thing. :-)
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 13:42
1
$begingroup$
I feel like this answer severely understates the impossibility of such a device. I think this device would be harder to get working than a device which could un-burn a piece of paper by recapturing all the exact gas, smoke, and ash atoms left over from burning and reassemble them to show you what was written on the paper.
$endgroup$
– Shufflepants
Jul 26 at 20:01
$begingroup$
light and anti-light Note that photons are their own antiparticle, "anti-light" is light.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 12:30
$begingroup$
light and anti-light Note that photons are their own antiparticle, "anti-light" is light.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 12:30
1
1
$begingroup$
Would a black hole work to "suck out" all the photons? I am aware that it would likely have rather catastrophic other side effects but I'm curious if it could still technically leave an area in darkness?
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jul 26 at 13:16
$begingroup$
Would a black hole work to "suck out" all the photons? I am aware that it would likely have rather catastrophic other side effects but I'm curious if it could still technically leave an area in darkness?
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jul 26 at 13:16
1
1
$begingroup$
@StephenG What I meant with "anti-light" in the answer wasn't a source of "anti-photons", but a light source which sends light waves which cancel out those of other lightsources. I am not sure how I could explain that better. But I am not sure if this is even necesary, because I didn't even mention photons in the answer.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jul 26 at 13:39
$begingroup$
@StephenG What I meant with "anti-light" in the answer wasn't a source of "anti-photons", but a light source which sends light waves which cancel out those of other lightsources. I am not sure how I could explain that better. But I am not sure if this is even necesary, because I didn't even mention photons in the answer.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Jul 26 at 13:39
$begingroup$
I'm simply providing some physics clarification. Given the material on WB SE (including my own), I think it's very easy for the lay person reading answers to get confused on these things. You could technically say your source was a source of anti-photons - a photon and an anti-photon are the same thing. :-)
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 13:42
$begingroup$
I'm simply providing some physics clarification. Given the material on WB SE (including my own), I think it's very easy for the lay person reading answers to get confused on these things. You could technically say your source was a source of anti-photons - a photon and an anti-photon are the same thing. :-)
$endgroup$
– StephenG
Jul 26 at 13:42
1
1
$begingroup$
I feel like this answer severely understates the impossibility of such a device. I think this device would be harder to get working than a device which could un-burn a piece of paper by recapturing all the exact gas, smoke, and ash atoms left over from burning and reassemble them to show you what was written on the paper.
$endgroup$
– Shufflepants
Jul 26 at 20:01
$begingroup$
I feel like this answer severely understates the impossibility of such a device. I think this device would be harder to get working than a device which could un-burn a piece of paper by recapturing all the exact gas, smoke, and ash atoms left over from burning and reassemble them to show you what was written on the paper.
$endgroup$
– Shufflepants
Jul 26 at 20:01
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
That already exists.
It's called a smoke bomb.

If you stick your head into it the smoke, you won't be able to see s... a thing.
If you make the smoke black, it will absorb visible light in all wavelengths. If you use vantablack, your absortion efficiency goes all the way to 99.96%.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
True, but it also has some potentially undesirable side effects...
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
Ironically you can get a similar effect (blind enemies) with a flashbang
$endgroup$
– jean
Jul 26 at 20:24
1
$begingroup$
Would there even be a discernable difference between creating darkness and a perfectly dark, smooth odorless smoke cloud that didn't dissipate? I guess the difference would be that it would persist after the electricity was removed and would take a perceptible amount of time to expand to it's maximum size.
$endgroup$
– Bill K
Jul 26 at 22:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That already exists.
It's called a smoke bomb.

If you stick your head into it the smoke, you won't be able to see s... a thing.
If you make the smoke black, it will absorb visible light in all wavelengths. If you use vantablack, your absortion efficiency goes all the way to 99.96%.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
True, but it also has some potentially undesirable side effects...
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
Ironically you can get a similar effect (blind enemies) with a flashbang
$endgroup$
– jean
Jul 26 at 20:24
1
$begingroup$
Would there even be a discernable difference between creating darkness and a perfectly dark, smooth odorless smoke cloud that didn't dissipate? I guess the difference would be that it would persist after the electricity was removed and would take a perceptible amount of time to expand to it's maximum size.
$endgroup$
– Bill K
Jul 26 at 22:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That already exists.
It's called a smoke bomb.

If you stick your head into it the smoke, you won't be able to see s... a thing.
If you make the smoke black, it will absorb visible light in all wavelengths. If you use vantablack, your absortion efficiency goes all the way to 99.96%.
$endgroup$
That already exists.
It's called a smoke bomb.

If you stick your head into it the smoke, you won't be able to see s... a thing.
If you make the smoke black, it will absorb visible light in all wavelengths. If you use vantablack, your absortion efficiency goes all the way to 99.96%.
answered Jul 26 at 13:48
RenanRenan
63.4k19 gold badges150 silver badges311 bronze badges
63.4k19 gold badges150 silver badges311 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
True, but it also has some potentially undesirable side effects...
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
Ironically you can get a similar effect (blind enemies) with a flashbang
$endgroup$
– jean
Jul 26 at 20:24
1
$begingroup$
Would there even be a discernable difference between creating darkness and a perfectly dark, smooth odorless smoke cloud that didn't dissipate? I guess the difference would be that it would persist after the electricity was removed and would take a perceptible amount of time to expand to it's maximum size.
$endgroup$
– Bill K
Jul 26 at 22:16
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
True, but it also has some potentially undesirable side effects...
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
Ironically you can get a similar effect (blind enemies) with a flashbang
$endgroup$
– jean
Jul 26 at 20:24
1
$begingroup$
Would there even be a discernable difference between creating darkness and a perfectly dark, smooth odorless smoke cloud that didn't dissipate? I guess the difference would be that it would persist after the electricity was removed and would take a perceptible amount of time to expand to it's maximum size.
$endgroup$
– Bill K
Jul 26 at 22:16
2
2
$begingroup$
True, but it also has some potentially undesirable side effects...
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:15
$begingroup$
True, but it also has some potentially undesirable side effects...
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:15
2
2
$begingroup$
Ironically you can get a similar effect (blind enemies) with a flashbang
$endgroup$
– jean
Jul 26 at 20:24
$begingroup$
Ironically you can get a similar effect (blind enemies) with a flashbang
$endgroup$
– jean
Jul 26 at 20:24
1
1
$begingroup$
Would there even be a discernable difference between creating darkness and a perfectly dark, smooth odorless smoke cloud that didn't dissipate? I guess the difference would be that it would persist after the electricity was removed and would take a perceptible amount of time to expand to it's maximum size.
$endgroup$
– Bill K
Jul 26 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Would there even be a discernable difference between creating darkness and a perfectly dark, smooth odorless smoke cloud that didn't dissipate? I guess the difference would be that it would persist after the electricity was removed and would take a perceptible amount of time to expand to it's maximum size.
$endgroup$
– Bill K
Jul 26 at 22:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Going laterally a bit here.
If all you need for your "darkness" is for people not to be able to see anything, then your device could generate some (unobtanium-based) E-M wave pattern which completely shuts down the optic nerve.
Obviously this will be useless if your intent is to stop hardware such as video cameras from recording information.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Going laterally a bit here.
If all you need for your "darkness" is for people not to be able to see anything, then your device could generate some (unobtanium-based) E-M wave pattern which completely shuts down the optic nerve.
Obviously this will be useless if your intent is to stop hardware such as video cameras from recording information.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Going laterally a bit here.
If all you need for your "darkness" is for people not to be able to see anything, then your device could generate some (unobtanium-based) E-M wave pattern which completely shuts down the optic nerve.
Obviously this will be useless if your intent is to stop hardware such as video cameras from recording information.
$endgroup$
Going laterally a bit here.
If all you need for your "darkness" is for people not to be able to see anything, then your device could generate some (unobtanium-based) E-M wave pattern which completely shuts down the optic nerve.
Obviously this will be useless if your intent is to stop hardware such as video cameras from recording information.
answered Jul 26 at 14:18
Carl WitthoftCarl Witthoft
7275 silver badges7 bronze badges
7275 silver badges7 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Based on answers above, two options:
High-tech smoke bomb, namely a cloud of nanobots that stay in a given area, fill the air in it evenly, are painted with Super-black paint. In fact, rather than microscopic nanobots, make them more like moths or floating flakes. Device coordinates nanobots and provides energy through induction: nanobots constantly circulate to the device to recharge, and then away from it to dim the furthest corners.
Brute force: device emits super-bright light that makes it impossible to see anything, by overwhelming both retinas in the eyes and sensors in cameras. Device will need a lot of energy, and a very efficient light bulb. Can make it a plot point that it does not last long.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Based on answers above, two options:
High-tech smoke bomb, namely a cloud of nanobots that stay in a given area, fill the air in it evenly, are painted with Super-black paint. In fact, rather than microscopic nanobots, make them more like moths or floating flakes. Device coordinates nanobots and provides energy through induction: nanobots constantly circulate to the device to recharge, and then away from it to dim the furthest corners.
Brute force: device emits super-bright light that makes it impossible to see anything, by overwhelming both retinas in the eyes and sensors in cameras. Device will need a lot of energy, and a very efficient light bulb. Can make it a plot point that it does not last long.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Based on answers above, two options:
High-tech smoke bomb, namely a cloud of nanobots that stay in a given area, fill the air in it evenly, are painted with Super-black paint. In fact, rather than microscopic nanobots, make them more like moths or floating flakes. Device coordinates nanobots and provides energy through induction: nanobots constantly circulate to the device to recharge, and then away from it to dim the furthest corners.
Brute force: device emits super-bright light that makes it impossible to see anything, by overwhelming both retinas in the eyes and sensors in cameras. Device will need a lot of energy, and a very efficient light bulb. Can make it a plot point that it does not last long.
$endgroup$
Based on answers above, two options:
High-tech smoke bomb, namely a cloud of nanobots that stay in a given area, fill the air in it evenly, are painted with Super-black paint. In fact, rather than microscopic nanobots, make them more like moths or floating flakes. Device coordinates nanobots and provides energy through induction: nanobots constantly circulate to the device to recharge, and then away from it to dim the furthest corners.
Brute force: device emits super-bright light that makes it impossible to see anything, by overwhelming both retinas in the eyes and sensors in cameras. Device will need a lot of energy, and a very efficient light bulb. Can make it a plot point that it does not last long.
answered Jul 26 at 15:15
Bald BearBald Bear
8,32714 silver badges29 bronze badges
8,32714 silver badges29 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although it's counter to every sci-fi show that I've ever seen, wouldn't a shield that blocks lasers also block physical light?
That would make it easy to turn on a shield emitter lightbulb and have it block all the light from entering an area. I'm not sure if it would stop light created in that area.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although it's counter to every sci-fi show that I've ever seen, wouldn't a shield that blocks lasers also block physical light?
That would make it easy to turn on a shield emitter lightbulb and have it block all the light from entering an area. I'm not sure if it would stop light created in that area.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although it's counter to every sci-fi show that I've ever seen, wouldn't a shield that blocks lasers also block physical light?
That would make it easy to turn on a shield emitter lightbulb and have it block all the light from entering an area. I'm not sure if it would stop light created in that area.
$endgroup$
Although it's counter to every sci-fi show that I've ever seen, wouldn't a shield that blocks lasers also block physical light?
That would make it easy to turn on a shield emitter lightbulb and have it block all the light from entering an area. I'm not sure if it would stop light created in that area.
answered Jul 26 at 22:22
Bill KBill K
1,1155 silver badges7 bronze badges
1,1155 silver badges7 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151663%2fcreating-darkness%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to worldbuilding. I think you should better define what you are looking for: an electrically actuated black curtain can do what you ask, but I suspect it's not in your scope.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jul 26 at 10:42
1
$begingroup$
I've editted your question to slightly improve the english; hopefully I haven't changed anything else important. Short answer though, "no".
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Jul 26 at 10:44
$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime thanx
$endgroup$
– abhilash
Jul 26 at 11:04
$begingroup$
FWIW, there are a couple hilarious articles on the subject of "Darkons" written by Bell Labs researchers. Google them for some fun.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Jul 26 at 14:14
$begingroup$
Welcome abhilash. Please check out our tour and help center. I added the tag light because your question is about removing it, so it seemed appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Jul 26 at 14:39