Why is autologous blood transfusion banned as a kind of doping? [closed]Making a training plan for medieval swordsmen / reenactmentRegain fitness for basketball after a long layoffWhat kind of weight training can I start my 12 year old son on?
Is an "are" omitted in this sentence
What does the ISO setting for mechanical 35mm film cameras actually do?
Is it uncompelling to continue the story with lower stakes?
Write The Shortest Program To Check If A Binary Tree Is Balanced
How many years before enough atoms of your body are replaced to survive the sudden disappearance of the original body’s atoms?
Are valid inequalities worth the effort given modern solvers?
What could prevent players from leaving an island?
How to win against ants
Vibration on the guitar when playing two strings
Which genus do I use for neutral expressions in German?
Ancients don't give a full level?
How to check a file was encrypted (really & correctly)
How to switch an 80286 from protected to real mode?
How do I show and not tell a backstory?
Is space radiation a risk for space film photography, and how is this prevented?
Getting an entry level IT position later in life
Why did the US Airways Flight 1549 passengers stay on the wings?
Identify Batman without getting caught
What is the German idiom or expression for when someone is being hypocritical against their own teachings?
How to approach protecting my code as a research assistant? Should I be worried in the first place?
London underground zone 1-2 train ticket
Examples of hyperbolic groups
Pronouns when writing from the point of view of a robot
Can I enter a rental property without giving notice if I'm afraid a tenant may be hurt?
Why is autologous blood transfusion banned as a kind of doping? [closed]
Making a training plan for medieval swordsmen / reenactmentRegain fitness for basketball after a long layoffWhat kind of weight training can I start my 12 year old son on?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Autologous blood transfusion, i.e. "storing my own blood to be used by later time", is considered a kind of doping. Why is this practice banned like taking drugs when there is clearly no external substance used?
sports
closed as off-topic by JohnP♦ Jul 29 at 13:28
- This question does not appear to be about physical fitness within the scope defined in the help center.
add a comment |
Autologous blood transfusion, i.e. "storing my own blood to be used by later time", is considered a kind of doping. Why is this practice banned like taking drugs when there is clearly no external substance used?
sports
closed as off-topic by JohnP♦ Jul 29 at 13:28
- This question does not appear to be about physical fitness within the scope defined in the help center.
The same argument could be made for steroids. Conceivably, you could extract out your own testosterone, bank it up, have your body restore to its natural level, and then start adding the extra back in.
– Alexander
Jul 26 at 22:43
add a comment |
Autologous blood transfusion, i.e. "storing my own blood to be used by later time", is considered a kind of doping. Why is this practice banned like taking drugs when there is clearly no external substance used?
sports
Autologous blood transfusion, i.e. "storing my own blood to be used by later time", is considered a kind of doping. Why is this practice banned like taking drugs when there is clearly no external substance used?
sports
sports
asked Jul 26 at 8:01
Michael TsangMichael Tsang
1462 bronze badges
1462 bronze badges
closed as off-topic by JohnP♦ Jul 29 at 13:28
- This question does not appear to be about physical fitness within the scope defined in the help center.
closed as off-topic by JohnP♦ Jul 29 at 13:28
- This question does not appear to be about physical fitness within the scope defined in the help center.
closed as off-topic by JohnP♦ Jul 29 at 13:28
- This question does not appear to be about physical fitness within the scope defined in the help center.
The same argument could be made for steroids. Conceivably, you could extract out your own testosterone, bank it up, have your body restore to its natural level, and then start adding the extra back in.
– Alexander
Jul 26 at 22:43
add a comment |
The same argument could be made for steroids. Conceivably, you could extract out your own testosterone, bank it up, have your body restore to its natural level, and then start adding the extra back in.
– Alexander
Jul 26 at 22:43
The same argument could be made for steroids. Conceivably, you could extract out your own testosterone, bank it up, have your body restore to its natural level, and then start adding the extra back in.
– Alexander
Jul 26 at 22:43
The same argument could be made for steroids. Conceivably, you could extract out your own testosterone, bank it up, have your body restore to its natural level, and then start adding the extra back in.
– Alexander
Jul 26 at 22:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Because it is a way to enhance performance, in an unnatural way. It basically has a similar effect as EPO: increasing your red blood cells. It can be very dangerous if done incorrectly, which is probably one of the reasons to ban it as a form of discouragement.
One of the most dangerous things that can happen is when the blood is if not stored correctly you can get severe infections which can make you very ill, in extreme cases if could end up being lethal. You can look up Riccardo Ricco for example, an Italian pro cyclist who tried using blood doping in 2011 which caused sepsis and kidney failure.
Increasing your red blood cells in a natural way, for example training at altitude, is allowed.
2
This could be improved by providing examples of what the dangers are: is it the red-cell count itself, the increased blood volume, dangers of the transfusion process, etc?
– chepner
Jul 26 at 18:19
@chepner I think that it can slow the heart rate down to extremely low rates. Endurance athletes tend to have low heart rates as it is. Lowering it even further has killed a few cyclists.
– Frank
Jul 27 at 4:32
@chepner I've added one of the dangers that recently actually happend in pro cycling.
– MJB
Jul 29 at 12:55
That sounds more like the result of a non-sterile needle than an overabundance of red blood cells.
– chepner
Jul 29 at 13:09
1
One of the biggest dangers is clots and blockage. The slow heart rate can't effectively move all the rbcs and they end up clotting and stroke occurs.
– JohnP♦
Jul 29 at 13:10
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Because it is a way to enhance performance, in an unnatural way. It basically has a similar effect as EPO: increasing your red blood cells. It can be very dangerous if done incorrectly, which is probably one of the reasons to ban it as a form of discouragement.
One of the most dangerous things that can happen is when the blood is if not stored correctly you can get severe infections which can make you very ill, in extreme cases if could end up being lethal. You can look up Riccardo Ricco for example, an Italian pro cyclist who tried using blood doping in 2011 which caused sepsis and kidney failure.
Increasing your red blood cells in a natural way, for example training at altitude, is allowed.
2
This could be improved by providing examples of what the dangers are: is it the red-cell count itself, the increased blood volume, dangers of the transfusion process, etc?
– chepner
Jul 26 at 18:19
@chepner I think that it can slow the heart rate down to extremely low rates. Endurance athletes tend to have low heart rates as it is. Lowering it even further has killed a few cyclists.
– Frank
Jul 27 at 4:32
@chepner I've added one of the dangers that recently actually happend in pro cycling.
– MJB
Jul 29 at 12:55
That sounds more like the result of a non-sterile needle than an overabundance of red blood cells.
– chepner
Jul 29 at 13:09
1
One of the biggest dangers is clots and blockage. The slow heart rate can't effectively move all the rbcs and they end up clotting and stroke occurs.
– JohnP♦
Jul 29 at 13:10
|
show 2 more comments
Because it is a way to enhance performance, in an unnatural way. It basically has a similar effect as EPO: increasing your red blood cells. It can be very dangerous if done incorrectly, which is probably one of the reasons to ban it as a form of discouragement.
One of the most dangerous things that can happen is when the blood is if not stored correctly you can get severe infections which can make you very ill, in extreme cases if could end up being lethal. You can look up Riccardo Ricco for example, an Italian pro cyclist who tried using blood doping in 2011 which caused sepsis and kidney failure.
Increasing your red blood cells in a natural way, for example training at altitude, is allowed.
2
This could be improved by providing examples of what the dangers are: is it the red-cell count itself, the increased blood volume, dangers of the transfusion process, etc?
– chepner
Jul 26 at 18:19
@chepner I think that it can slow the heart rate down to extremely low rates. Endurance athletes tend to have low heart rates as it is. Lowering it even further has killed a few cyclists.
– Frank
Jul 27 at 4:32
@chepner I've added one of the dangers that recently actually happend in pro cycling.
– MJB
Jul 29 at 12:55
That sounds more like the result of a non-sterile needle than an overabundance of red blood cells.
– chepner
Jul 29 at 13:09
1
One of the biggest dangers is clots and blockage. The slow heart rate can't effectively move all the rbcs and they end up clotting and stroke occurs.
– JohnP♦
Jul 29 at 13:10
|
show 2 more comments
Because it is a way to enhance performance, in an unnatural way. It basically has a similar effect as EPO: increasing your red blood cells. It can be very dangerous if done incorrectly, which is probably one of the reasons to ban it as a form of discouragement.
One of the most dangerous things that can happen is when the blood is if not stored correctly you can get severe infections which can make you very ill, in extreme cases if could end up being lethal. You can look up Riccardo Ricco for example, an Italian pro cyclist who tried using blood doping in 2011 which caused sepsis and kidney failure.
Increasing your red blood cells in a natural way, for example training at altitude, is allowed.
Because it is a way to enhance performance, in an unnatural way. It basically has a similar effect as EPO: increasing your red blood cells. It can be very dangerous if done incorrectly, which is probably one of the reasons to ban it as a form of discouragement.
One of the most dangerous things that can happen is when the blood is if not stored correctly you can get severe infections which can make you very ill, in extreme cases if could end up being lethal. You can look up Riccardo Ricco for example, an Italian pro cyclist who tried using blood doping in 2011 which caused sepsis and kidney failure.
Increasing your red blood cells in a natural way, for example training at altitude, is allowed.
edited Jul 29 at 10:58
answered Jul 26 at 8:18
MJBMJB
2,4366 silver badges23 bronze badges
2,4366 silver badges23 bronze badges
2
This could be improved by providing examples of what the dangers are: is it the red-cell count itself, the increased blood volume, dangers of the transfusion process, etc?
– chepner
Jul 26 at 18:19
@chepner I think that it can slow the heart rate down to extremely low rates. Endurance athletes tend to have low heart rates as it is. Lowering it even further has killed a few cyclists.
– Frank
Jul 27 at 4:32
@chepner I've added one of the dangers that recently actually happend in pro cycling.
– MJB
Jul 29 at 12:55
That sounds more like the result of a non-sterile needle than an overabundance of red blood cells.
– chepner
Jul 29 at 13:09
1
One of the biggest dangers is clots and blockage. The slow heart rate can't effectively move all the rbcs and they end up clotting and stroke occurs.
– JohnP♦
Jul 29 at 13:10
|
show 2 more comments
2
This could be improved by providing examples of what the dangers are: is it the red-cell count itself, the increased blood volume, dangers of the transfusion process, etc?
– chepner
Jul 26 at 18:19
@chepner I think that it can slow the heart rate down to extremely low rates. Endurance athletes tend to have low heart rates as it is. Lowering it even further has killed a few cyclists.
– Frank
Jul 27 at 4:32
@chepner I've added one of the dangers that recently actually happend in pro cycling.
– MJB
Jul 29 at 12:55
That sounds more like the result of a non-sterile needle than an overabundance of red blood cells.
– chepner
Jul 29 at 13:09
1
One of the biggest dangers is clots and blockage. The slow heart rate can't effectively move all the rbcs and they end up clotting and stroke occurs.
– JohnP♦
Jul 29 at 13:10
2
2
This could be improved by providing examples of what the dangers are: is it the red-cell count itself, the increased blood volume, dangers of the transfusion process, etc?
– chepner
Jul 26 at 18:19
This could be improved by providing examples of what the dangers are: is it the red-cell count itself, the increased blood volume, dangers of the transfusion process, etc?
– chepner
Jul 26 at 18:19
@chepner I think that it can slow the heart rate down to extremely low rates. Endurance athletes tend to have low heart rates as it is. Lowering it even further has killed a few cyclists.
– Frank
Jul 27 at 4:32
@chepner I think that it can slow the heart rate down to extremely low rates. Endurance athletes tend to have low heart rates as it is. Lowering it even further has killed a few cyclists.
– Frank
Jul 27 at 4:32
@chepner I've added one of the dangers that recently actually happend in pro cycling.
– MJB
Jul 29 at 12:55
@chepner I've added one of the dangers that recently actually happend in pro cycling.
– MJB
Jul 29 at 12:55
That sounds more like the result of a non-sterile needle than an overabundance of red blood cells.
– chepner
Jul 29 at 13:09
That sounds more like the result of a non-sterile needle than an overabundance of red blood cells.
– chepner
Jul 29 at 13:09
1
1
One of the biggest dangers is clots and blockage. The slow heart rate can't effectively move all the rbcs and they end up clotting and stroke occurs.
– JohnP♦
Jul 29 at 13:10
One of the biggest dangers is clots and blockage. The slow heart rate can't effectively move all the rbcs and they end up clotting and stroke occurs.
– JohnP♦
Jul 29 at 13:10
|
show 2 more comments
The same argument could be made for steroids. Conceivably, you could extract out your own testosterone, bank it up, have your body restore to its natural level, and then start adding the extra back in.
– Alexander
Jul 26 at 22:43