How to count points under the curve?Picking points in a plane under a curve given by a listHow to select points from a table that are within some regionSelecting points on either side of a curveApproximating an ornamental curveCount the number of regions made by Lissajous curvePlotting the image of a curve under a flowReducing the number of plotmarkers in listlineplotHow to calculate the control points of a Bézier curve?Plotting the sum of two points on an elliptic curveRegion bounded by the curveRandom points around the given curveFinding Area Under a Curveshowing the grid points on the curve

How can God warn people of the upcoming rapture without disrupting society?

Are employers legally allowed to pay employees in goods and services equal to or greater than the minimum wage?

(A room / an office) where an artist works

Installing Windows to flash BIOS, then reinstalling Ubuntu

How far did Gandalf and the Balrog drop from the bridge in Moria?

Why aren’t there water shutoff valves for each room?

Help, I cannot decide when to start the story

Why aren't rockets built with truss structures inside their fuel & oxidizer tanks to increase structural strength?

If "more guns less crime", how do gun advocates explain that the EU has less crime than the US?

Will using a resistor in series with a LED to control its voltage increase the total energy expenditure?

Tempoverlustspiel

If you know the location of an invisible creature, can you attack it?

PhD advisor lost funding, need advice

How do some PhD students get 10+ papers? Is that what I need for landing good faculty position?

Why is the Lucas test not recommended to differentiate higher alcohols?

Boss asked a co-worker to assault me

Word for an event that will likely never happen again

Can lodestones be used to magnetize crude iron weapons?

Can the IPA represent all languages' tones?

How do you deal with the emotions of not being the one to find the cause of a bug?

The cat ate your input again!

Corroded Metal vs Magical Armor, should it melt it?

In which case does the Security misconfiguration vulnerability apply to?

Why aren't rainbows blurred-out into nothing after they are produced?



How to count points under the curve?


Picking points in a plane under a curve given by a listHow to select points from a table that are within some regionSelecting points on either side of a curveApproximating an ornamental curveCount the number of regions made by Lissajous curvePlotting the image of a curve under a flowReducing the number of plotmarkers in listlineplotHow to calculate the control points of a Bézier curve?Plotting the sum of two points on an elliptic curveRegion bounded by the curveRandom points around the given curveFinding Area Under a Curveshowing the grid points on the curve






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


I need a formula to calculate how many points are there under the curve $y=x$.figure










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Some related: (97299), (157149), (181620)...I think there's more, but couldn't find the right search terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    Aug 1 at 20:46

















6












$begingroup$


I need a formula to calculate how many points are there under the curve $y=x$.figure










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Some related: (97299), (157149), (181620)...I think there's more, but couldn't find the right search terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    Aug 1 at 20:46













6












6








6





$begingroup$


I need a formula to calculate how many points are there under the curve $y=x$.figure










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I need a formula to calculate how many points are there under the curve $y=x$.figure







plotting graphics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 2 at 7:43









J. M. is away

100k10 gold badges316 silver badges473 bronze badges




100k10 gold badges316 silver badges473 bronze badges










asked Aug 1 at 13:02









MathMath

313 bronze badges




313 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Some related: (97299), (157149), (181620)...I think there's more, but couldn't find the right search terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    Aug 1 at 20:46
















  • $begingroup$
    Some related: (97299), (157149), (181620)...I think there's more, but couldn't find the right search terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    Aug 1 at 20:46















$begingroup$
Some related: (97299), (157149), (181620)...I think there's more, but couldn't find the right search terms.
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Aug 1 at 20:46




$begingroup$
Some related: (97299), (157149), (181620)...I think there's more, but couldn't find the right search terms.
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Aug 1 at 20:46










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

Try



p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
pu=Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]
Length[pu] (* number of points yi<xi*)

Show[Plot[x, x, 0, 1], ListPlot[p],ListPlot[pu, PlotStyle -> Red]]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One could also use pu = Select[p, Apply[Greater]] in this case. A slower, but generalizable approach would be rmf = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y <= x, x, y]]; pu = Select[p, rmf]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is away
    Aug 1 at 13:33











  • $begingroup$
    How about if i want to do that in sine curve?
    $endgroup$
    – Math
    Aug 2 at 13:07










  • $begingroup$
    @Math Something like Select[p, #[[2]] <Sin[ #[[1]] ] &]
    $endgroup$
    – Ulrich Neumann
    Aug 2 at 13:13


















9












$begingroup$

p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x]


This is many times more efficient for long lists:



Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]]


Edit:



A few timings under version 12.0 on macos:



p = RandomReal[0, 1, 1000000, 2];
Length[Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]] // RepeatedTiming
Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x] // RepeatedTiming
Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]] // RepeatedTiming



1.31, 499894



0.757, 499894



0.0089, 499894







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting alternatives. By the way the last one is the slowest (MMA v.11.0.1)
    $endgroup$
    – Ulrich Neumann
    Aug 1 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    @UlrichNeumann Really? That is indeed surprising... Unfornately, I cannot test it under v. 11.0.1; I have removed it recently.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Aug 1 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    Similar timings under v10.4 and 11.3.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    Aug 1 at 16:33






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @UlrichNeumann That is surprising. What if you try the compiled version Compile[p,_Real,2,Total[UnitStep[p.1,-1]]]?
    $endgroup$
    – Silvia
    Aug 2 at 3:20










  • $begingroup$
    @Silvia Great idea to use Dot! And I am also surprised that Compile makes a difference here.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Aug 2 at 3:21



















8












$begingroup$

You can use RegionMember for this:



reg = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y<x, x,y]];

Tally @ reg[p]



False, 23, True, 27




This will not be as fast as Henrik's answer.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203097%2fhow-to-count-points-under-the-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9












    $begingroup$

    Try



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
    pu=Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]
    Length[pu] (* number of points yi<xi*)

    Show[Plot[x, x, 0, 1], ListPlot[p],ListPlot[pu, PlotStyle -> Red]]


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      One could also use pu = Select[p, Apply[Greater]] in this case. A slower, but generalizable approach would be rmf = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y <= x, x, y]]; pu = Select[p, rmf]
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is away
      Aug 1 at 13:33











    • $begingroup$
      How about if i want to do that in sine curve?
      $endgroup$
      – Math
      Aug 2 at 13:07










    • $begingroup$
      @Math Something like Select[p, #[[2]] <Sin[ #[[1]] ] &]
      $endgroup$
      – Ulrich Neumann
      Aug 2 at 13:13















    9












    $begingroup$

    Try



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
    pu=Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]
    Length[pu] (* number of points yi<xi*)

    Show[Plot[x, x, 0, 1], ListPlot[p],ListPlot[pu, PlotStyle -> Red]]


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      One could also use pu = Select[p, Apply[Greater]] in this case. A slower, but generalizable approach would be rmf = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y <= x, x, y]]; pu = Select[p, rmf]
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is away
      Aug 1 at 13:33











    • $begingroup$
      How about if i want to do that in sine curve?
      $endgroup$
      – Math
      Aug 2 at 13:07










    • $begingroup$
      @Math Something like Select[p, #[[2]] <Sin[ #[[1]] ] &]
      $endgroup$
      – Ulrich Neumann
      Aug 2 at 13:13













    9












    9








    9





    $begingroup$

    Try



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
    pu=Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]
    Length[pu] (* number of points yi<xi*)

    Show[Plot[x, x, 0, 1], ListPlot[p],ListPlot[pu, PlotStyle -> Red]]


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Try



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
    pu=Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]
    Length[pu] (* number of points yi<xi*)

    Show[Plot[x, x, 0, 1], ListPlot[p],ListPlot[pu, PlotStyle -> Red]]


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Aug 1 at 13:17









    Ulrich NeumannUlrich Neumann

    13.5k7 silver badges22 bronze badges




    13.5k7 silver badges22 bronze badges










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      One could also use pu = Select[p, Apply[Greater]] in this case. A slower, but generalizable approach would be rmf = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y <= x, x, y]]; pu = Select[p, rmf]
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is away
      Aug 1 at 13:33











    • $begingroup$
      How about if i want to do that in sine curve?
      $endgroup$
      – Math
      Aug 2 at 13:07










    • $begingroup$
      @Math Something like Select[p, #[[2]] <Sin[ #[[1]] ] &]
      $endgroup$
      – Ulrich Neumann
      Aug 2 at 13:13












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      One could also use pu = Select[p, Apply[Greater]] in this case. A slower, but generalizable approach would be rmf = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y <= x, x, y]]; pu = Select[p, rmf]
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is away
      Aug 1 at 13:33











    • $begingroup$
      How about if i want to do that in sine curve?
      $endgroup$
      – Math
      Aug 2 at 13:07










    • $begingroup$
      @Math Something like Select[p, #[[2]] <Sin[ #[[1]] ] &]
      $endgroup$
      – Ulrich Neumann
      Aug 2 at 13:13







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    One could also use pu = Select[p, Apply[Greater]] in this case. A slower, but generalizable approach would be rmf = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y <= x, x, y]]; pu = Select[p, rmf]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is away
    Aug 1 at 13:33





    $begingroup$
    One could also use pu = Select[p, Apply[Greater]] in this case. A slower, but generalizable approach would be rmf = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y <= x, x, y]]; pu = Select[p, rmf]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is away
    Aug 1 at 13:33













    $begingroup$
    How about if i want to do that in sine curve?
    $endgroup$
    – Math
    Aug 2 at 13:07




    $begingroup$
    How about if i want to do that in sine curve?
    $endgroup$
    – Math
    Aug 2 at 13:07












    $begingroup$
    @Math Something like Select[p, #[[2]] <Sin[ #[[1]] ] &]
    $endgroup$
    – Ulrich Neumann
    Aug 2 at 13:13




    $begingroup$
    @Math Something like Select[p, #[[2]] <Sin[ #[[1]] ] &]
    $endgroup$
    – Ulrich Neumann
    Aug 2 at 13:13













    9












    $begingroup$

    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
    Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x]


    This is many times more efficient for long lists:



    Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]]


    Edit:



    A few timings under version 12.0 on macos:



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 1000000, 2];
    Length[Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]] // RepeatedTiming
    Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x] // RepeatedTiming
    Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]] // RepeatedTiming



    1.31, 499894



    0.757, 499894



    0.0089, 499894







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Very interesting alternatives. By the way the last one is the slowest (MMA v.11.0.1)
      $endgroup$
      – Ulrich Neumann
      Aug 1 at 14:19










    • $begingroup$
      @UlrichNeumann Really? That is indeed surprising... Unfornately, I cannot test it under v. 11.0.1; I have removed it recently.
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      Aug 1 at 16:26










    • $begingroup$
      Similar timings under v10.4 and 11.3.
      $endgroup$
      – corey979
      Aug 1 at 16:33






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @UlrichNeumann That is surprising. What if you try the compiled version Compile[p,_Real,2,Total[UnitStep[p.1,-1]]]?
      $endgroup$
      – Silvia
      Aug 2 at 3:20










    • $begingroup$
      @Silvia Great idea to use Dot! And I am also surprised that Compile makes a difference here.
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      Aug 2 at 3:21
















    9












    $begingroup$

    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
    Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x]


    This is many times more efficient for long lists:



    Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]]


    Edit:



    A few timings under version 12.0 on macos:



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 1000000, 2];
    Length[Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]] // RepeatedTiming
    Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x] // RepeatedTiming
    Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]] // RepeatedTiming



    1.31, 499894



    0.757, 499894



    0.0089, 499894







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Very interesting alternatives. By the way the last one is the slowest (MMA v.11.0.1)
      $endgroup$
      – Ulrich Neumann
      Aug 1 at 14:19










    • $begingroup$
      @UlrichNeumann Really? That is indeed surprising... Unfornately, I cannot test it under v. 11.0.1; I have removed it recently.
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      Aug 1 at 16:26










    • $begingroup$
      Similar timings under v10.4 and 11.3.
      $endgroup$
      – corey979
      Aug 1 at 16:33






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @UlrichNeumann That is surprising. What if you try the compiled version Compile[p,_Real,2,Total[UnitStep[p.1,-1]]]?
      $endgroup$
      – Silvia
      Aug 2 at 3:20










    • $begingroup$
      @Silvia Great idea to use Dot! And I am also surprised that Compile makes a difference here.
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      Aug 2 at 3:21














    9












    9








    9





    $begingroup$

    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
    Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x]


    This is many times more efficient for long lists:



    Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]]


    Edit:



    A few timings under version 12.0 on macos:



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 1000000, 2];
    Length[Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]] // RepeatedTiming
    Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x] // RepeatedTiming
    Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]] // RepeatedTiming



    1.31, 499894



    0.757, 499894



    0.0089, 499894







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 50, 2]
    Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x]


    This is many times more efficient for long lists:



    Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]]


    Edit:



    A few timings under version 12.0 on macos:



    p = RandomReal[0, 1, 1000000, 2];
    Length[Select[p, #[[2]] < #[[1]] &]] // RepeatedTiming
    Count[p, x_, y_ /; y < x] // RepeatedTiming
    Total[UnitStep[Subtract @@ Transpose[p]]] // RepeatedTiming



    1.31, 499894



    0.757, 499894



    0.0089, 499894








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 1 at 16:24

























    answered Aug 1 at 14:07









    Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher

    67.1k5 gold badges96 silver badges185 bronze badges




    67.1k5 gold badges96 silver badges185 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      Very interesting alternatives. By the way the last one is the slowest (MMA v.11.0.1)
      $endgroup$
      – Ulrich Neumann
      Aug 1 at 14:19










    • $begingroup$
      @UlrichNeumann Really? That is indeed surprising... Unfornately, I cannot test it under v. 11.0.1; I have removed it recently.
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      Aug 1 at 16:26










    • $begingroup$
      Similar timings under v10.4 and 11.3.
      $endgroup$
      – corey979
      Aug 1 at 16:33






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @UlrichNeumann That is surprising. What if you try the compiled version Compile[p,_Real,2,Total[UnitStep[p.1,-1]]]?
      $endgroup$
      – Silvia
      Aug 2 at 3:20










    • $begingroup$
      @Silvia Great idea to use Dot! And I am also surprised that Compile makes a difference here.
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      Aug 2 at 3:21

















    • $begingroup$
      Very interesting alternatives. By the way the last one is the slowest (MMA v.11.0.1)
      $endgroup$
      – Ulrich Neumann
      Aug 1 at 14:19










    • $begingroup$
      @UlrichNeumann Really? That is indeed surprising... Unfornately, I cannot test it under v. 11.0.1; I have removed it recently.
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      Aug 1 at 16:26










    • $begingroup$
      Similar timings under v10.4 and 11.3.
      $endgroup$
      – corey979
      Aug 1 at 16:33






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @UlrichNeumann That is surprising. What if you try the compiled version Compile[p,_Real,2,Total[UnitStep[p.1,-1]]]?
      $endgroup$
      – Silvia
      Aug 2 at 3:20










    • $begingroup$
      @Silvia Great idea to use Dot! And I am also surprised that Compile makes a difference here.
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      Aug 2 at 3:21
















    $begingroup$
    Very interesting alternatives. By the way the last one is the slowest (MMA v.11.0.1)
    $endgroup$
    – Ulrich Neumann
    Aug 1 at 14:19




    $begingroup$
    Very interesting alternatives. By the way the last one is the slowest (MMA v.11.0.1)
    $endgroup$
    – Ulrich Neumann
    Aug 1 at 14:19












    $begingroup$
    @UlrichNeumann Really? That is indeed surprising... Unfornately, I cannot test it under v. 11.0.1; I have removed it recently.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Aug 1 at 16:26




    $begingroup$
    @UlrichNeumann Really? That is indeed surprising... Unfornately, I cannot test it under v. 11.0.1; I have removed it recently.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Aug 1 at 16:26












    $begingroup$
    Similar timings under v10.4 and 11.3.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    Aug 1 at 16:33




    $begingroup$
    Similar timings under v10.4 and 11.3.
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    Aug 1 at 16:33




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @UlrichNeumann That is surprising. What if you try the compiled version Compile[p,_Real,2,Total[UnitStep[p.1,-1]]]?
    $endgroup$
    – Silvia
    Aug 2 at 3:20




    $begingroup$
    @UlrichNeumann That is surprising. What if you try the compiled version Compile[p,_Real,2,Total[UnitStep[p.1,-1]]]?
    $endgroup$
    – Silvia
    Aug 2 at 3:20












    $begingroup$
    @Silvia Great idea to use Dot! And I am also surprised that Compile makes a difference here.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Aug 2 at 3:21





    $begingroup$
    @Silvia Great idea to use Dot! And I am also surprised that Compile makes a difference here.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Aug 2 at 3:21












    8












    $begingroup$

    You can use RegionMember for this:



    reg = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y<x, x,y]];

    Tally @ reg[p]



    False, 23, True, 27




    This will not be as fast as Henrik's answer.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      8












      $begingroup$

      You can use RegionMember for this:



      reg = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y<x, x,y]];

      Tally @ reg[p]



      False, 23, True, 27




      This will not be as fast as Henrik's answer.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        8












        8








        8





        $begingroup$

        You can use RegionMember for this:



        reg = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y<x, x,y]];

        Tally @ reg[p]



        False, 23, True, 27




        This will not be as fast as Henrik's answer.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You can use RegionMember for this:



        reg = RegionMember[ImplicitRegion[y<x, x,y]];

        Tally @ reg[p]



        False, 23, True, 27




        This will not be as fast as Henrik's answer.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 1 at 15:51









        Carl WollCarl Woll

        89k3 gold badges117 silver badges228 bronze badges




        89k3 gold badges117 silver badges228 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203097%2fhow-to-count-points-under-the-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?