Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcdAdjusting the width of a displaymath environmenttikzcd, arrows not nicely alignedParallel arrows in tikzcd natural transformationRounded arrow in tikzcdDouble arrows in tikzcdTikzCD: everything is getting mashed togetherTikzcd question on arrowsArrows with tikzcd“equal” arrows without transparent ends possible in tikzcd?Boldface arrows in tikzcd

Car headlights in a world without electricity

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?

What is the opposite of "eschatology"?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

What is a Samsaran Word™?

Theorists sure want true answers to this!

In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?

How many wives did king shaul have

Rotate ASCII Art by 45 Degrees

Do Iron Man suits sport waste management systems?

How obscure is the use of 令 in 令和?

Does the Cone of Cold spell freeze water?

Why do I get negative height?

Processor speed limited at 0.4 Ghz

How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?

Unlock My Phone! February 2018

How do I exit BASH while loop using modulus operator?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to log in to her iPad. Do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

What historical events would have to change in order to make 19th century "steampunk" technology possible?

Is this answer explanation correct?

What exactly is ineptocracy?

Ambiguity in the definition of entropy



Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd


Adjusting the width of a displaymath environmenttikzcd, arrows not nicely alignedParallel arrows in tikzcd natural transformationRounded arrow in tikzcdDouble arrows in tikzcdTikzCD: everything is getting mashed togetherTikzcd question on arrowsArrows with tikzcd“equal” arrows without transparent ends possible in tikzcd?Boldface arrows in tikzcd













6















I have a quite large description of an arrow, and row sep = huge does not make the arrow long enough. Is there a way to format this better?



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamssymb
usepackagetikz-cd
usepackagefullpage
usepackageamsthm
usepackageadjustbox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
begintikzcd[column sep = huge, row sep = huge]
E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[r, shift left, "
<pi_cod(u) "] arrow[r, shift right, " u in hom(mathcalE)"'] & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
F(cod(u))
endtikzcd
enddocument









share|improve this question
























  • I've never seen huge as an argument for column sep before. If you look in the tikz-cd manual, you'll notice that you can give any arbitrary length (say 5cm) instead of huge, then manual states what huge is an alias for.

    – daleif
    19 hours ago











  • That said I'd probably consider rewriting this diagram instead and it will not be particularly readable for the reader anyway.

    – daleif
    19 hours ago















6















I have a quite large description of an arrow, and row sep = huge does not make the arrow long enough. Is there a way to format this better?



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamssymb
usepackagetikz-cd
usepackagefullpage
usepackageamsthm
usepackageadjustbox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
begintikzcd[column sep = huge, row sep = huge]
E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[r, shift left, "
<pi_cod(u) "] arrow[r, shift right, " u in hom(mathcalE)"'] & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
F(cod(u))
endtikzcd
enddocument









share|improve this question
























  • I've never seen huge as an argument for column sep before. If you look in the tikz-cd manual, you'll notice that you can give any arbitrary length (say 5cm) instead of huge, then manual states what huge is an alias for.

    – daleif
    19 hours ago











  • That said I'd probably consider rewriting this diagram instead and it will not be particularly readable for the reader anyway.

    – daleif
    19 hours ago













6












6








6


1






I have a quite large description of an arrow, and row sep = huge does not make the arrow long enough. Is there a way to format this better?



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamssymb
usepackagetikz-cd
usepackagefullpage
usepackageamsthm
usepackageadjustbox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
begintikzcd[column sep = huge, row sep = huge]
E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[r, shift left, "
<pi_cod(u) "] arrow[r, shift right, " u in hom(mathcalE)"'] & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
F(cod(u))
endtikzcd
enddocument









share|improve this question
















I have a quite large description of an arrow, and row sep = huge does not make the arrow long enough. Is there a way to format this better?



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamssymb
usepackagetikz-cd
usepackagefullpage
usepackageamsthm
usepackageadjustbox
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
begintikzcd[column sep = huge, row sep = huge]
E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[r, shift left, "
<pi_cod(u) "] arrow[r, shift right, " u in hom(mathcalE)"'] & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
F(cod(u))
endtikzcd
enddocument






tikz-arrows tikz-cd






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago









JouleV

9,91322558




9,91322558










asked 19 hours ago









user388557user388557

1453




1453












  • I've never seen huge as an argument for column sep before. If you look in the tikz-cd manual, you'll notice that you can give any arbitrary length (say 5cm) instead of huge, then manual states what huge is an alias for.

    – daleif
    19 hours ago











  • That said I'd probably consider rewriting this diagram instead and it will not be particularly readable for the reader anyway.

    – daleif
    19 hours ago

















  • I've never seen huge as an argument for column sep before. If you look in the tikz-cd manual, you'll notice that you can give any arbitrary length (say 5cm) instead of huge, then manual states what huge is an alias for.

    – daleif
    19 hours ago











  • That said I'd probably consider rewriting this diagram instead and it will not be particularly readable for the reader anyway.

    – daleif
    19 hours ago
















I've never seen huge as an argument for column sep before. If you look in the tikz-cd manual, you'll notice that you can give any arbitrary length (say 5cm) instead of huge, then manual states what huge is an alias for.

– daleif
19 hours ago





I've never seen huge as an argument for column sep before. If you look in the tikz-cd manual, you'll notice that you can give any arbitrary length (say 5cm) instead of huge, then manual states what huge is an alias for.

– daleif
19 hours ago













That said I'd probably consider rewriting this diagram instead and it will not be particularly readable for the reader anyway.

– daleif
19 hours ago





That said I'd probably consider rewriting this diagram instead and it will not be particularly readable for the reader anyway.

– daleif
19 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















5














Here are two different ways



enter image description here



documentclassarticle

usepackageamsmath
usepackageamssymb
usepackagetikz-cd

DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
DeclareMathOperatordomdom
DeclareMathOperatorobob

begindocument

Option 1: wide column separation specified by dimension
beginequation*
begintikzcd[column sep = 10em]
E arrow[r, "e"] & displaystyleprod_i in
ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
arrow[r, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
hom(mathcalE)rangle"] arrow[r, shift right, "langle F(u)
pi_dom(u) mid u in
hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
& displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
endtikzcd
endequation*

Option 2: let arrows cover two (or more) columns
beginequation*
begintikzcd[column sep = huge]
E arrow[r, "e"]
& displaystyleprod_i in ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
arrow[rr, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
hom(mathcalE)rangle"]
arrow[rr, shift right, "langle F(u) pi_dom(u)
mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
&& displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
endtikzcd
endequation*

enddocument


The first is simply to specify the column sep as a dimension.
The second is to add an extra column under the long arrows, so you have



A arrow[r] & B arrow[rr] && C


instead of



A arrow[r] & B arrow[r] & C


You can make this wider by using more columns



A arrow[r] & B arrow[rrr] &&& C


etc.



Note I have recoded much of your mathematics.






share|improve this answer






























    7














    Add a width specification:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackagetikz-cd

    DeclareMathOperatorobob
    DeclareMathOperatordomdom
    DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

    begindocument

    begintikzcd
    E arrow[r, "e"] &
    prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
    arrow[
    r, shift left,
    "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
    ]
    arrow[
    r, shift right,
    "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
    ] &[8em]
    prod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
    endtikzcd

    enddocument


    Note the adjustments I made:




    • <...> should be langle...rangle


    • Pi should be prod


    • | should be mid

    • ob, dom and cod should be typeset upright

    enter image description here



    A possible alternative with smashoperator that makes the diagram shorter:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,mathtools
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackagetikz-cd

    DeclareMathOperatorobob
    DeclareMathOperatordomdom
    DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

    begindocument

    begintikzcd
    E arrow[r, "e"] &
    smashoperatorprod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
    arrow[
    r, shift left,
    "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
    ]
    arrow[
    r, shift right,
    "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
    ] &[10em]
    smashoperatorprod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
    endtikzcd

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2





      Eventually, someone who knows the &[<lenght>] option, you beat me by a second, lol!

      – CarLaTeX
      18 hours ago











    • +1 Of course, loading amsmath is not needed once you load mathtools.

      – Andrew Swann
      18 hours ago


















    4














    Add an empty column between columns 2 and 3. I also added some improvements to the diagram.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackagetikz-cd
    usepackagefullpage
    usepackageamsthm
    usepackageadjustbox

    begindocument

    begintikzcd[column sep= huge, row sep=huge]
    E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[rr, shift left=1ex, "
    langlepi_cod(u) , "] arrow[rr, shift right=1ex, "langle F(u)
    pi_dom(u) , "'] & & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
    F(cod(u))
    endtikzcd

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer






























      4














      I remade everything in normal TikZ and correct (many) typos. Also, take note that I use langle and rangle instead of < and >. A curve is always more readable than a straight line in this case in my opinion.



      documentclassstandalone
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackagetikz
      usetikzlibrarypositioning
      DeclareMathOperatorobob
      DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
      DeclareMathOperatordomdom
      begindocument
      begintikzpicture[>=stealth]
      node (mid) $prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)$;
      node[left=1cm of mid] (left) $E$;
      node[right=4cm of mid] (right) $prod_u in hom(mathcalE)F(cod(u))$;
      draw[->] (left)--(mid) node[midway,above] $scriptstyle e$;
      draw[->] ([yshift=.2em]mid.east) to[bend left=5] node[midway,above] $scriptstylelanglepi_cod(u) ([yshift=.2em]right.west);
      draw[->] ([yshift=-.2em]mid.east) to[bend right=5] node[midway,below] $scriptstylelangle F(u)pi_dom(u) ([yshift=-.2em]right.west);
      endtikzpicture
      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer

























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "85"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482737%2fgetting-extremely-large-arrows-with-tikzcd%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        5














        Here are two different ways



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle

        usepackageamsmath
        usepackageamssymb
        usepackagetikz-cd

        DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
        DeclareMathOperatordomdom
        DeclareMathOperatorobob

        begindocument

        Option 1: wide column separation specified by dimension
        beginequation*
        begintikzcd[column sep = 10em]
        E arrow[r, "e"] & displaystyleprod_i in
        ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
        arrow[r, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
        hom(mathcalE)rangle"] arrow[r, shift right, "langle F(u)
        pi_dom(u) mid u in
        hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
        & displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
        endtikzcd
        endequation*

        Option 2: let arrows cover two (or more) columns
        beginequation*
        begintikzcd[column sep = huge]
        E arrow[r, "e"]
        & displaystyleprod_i in ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
        arrow[rr, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
        hom(mathcalE)rangle"]
        arrow[rr, shift right, "langle F(u) pi_dom(u)
        mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
        && displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
        endtikzcd
        endequation*

        enddocument


        The first is simply to specify the column sep as a dimension.
        The second is to add an extra column under the long arrows, so you have



        A arrow[r] & B arrow[rr] && C


        instead of



        A arrow[r] & B arrow[r] & C


        You can make this wider by using more columns



        A arrow[r] & B arrow[rrr] &&& C


        etc.



        Note I have recoded much of your mathematics.






        share|improve this answer



























          5














          Here are two different ways



          enter image description here



          documentclassarticle

          usepackageamsmath
          usepackageamssymb
          usepackagetikz-cd

          DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
          DeclareMathOperatordomdom
          DeclareMathOperatorobob

          begindocument

          Option 1: wide column separation specified by dimension
          beginequation*
          begintikzcd[column sep = 10em]
          E arrow[r, "e"] & displaystyleprod_i in
          ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
          arrow[r, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
          hom(mathcalE)rangle"] arrow[r, shift right, "langle F(u)
          pi_dom(u) mid u in
          hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
          & displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
          endtikzcd
          endequation*

          Option 2: let arrows cover two (or more) columns
          beginequation*
          begintikzcd[column sep = huge]
          E arrow[r, "e"]
          & displaystyleprod_i in ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
          arrow[rr, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
          hom(mathcalE)rangle"]
          arrow[rr, shift right, "langle F(u) pi_dom(u)
          mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
          && displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
          endtikzcd
          endequation*

          enddocument


          The first is simply to specify the column sep as a dimension.
          The second is to add an extra column under the long arrows, so you have



          A arrow[r] & B arrow[rr] && C


          instead of



          A arrow[r] & B arrow[r] & C


          You can make this wider by using more columns



          A arrow[r] & B arrow[rrr] &&& C


          etc.



          Note I have recoded much of your mathematics.






          share|improve this answer

























            5












            5








            5







            Here are two different ways



            enter image description here



            documentclassarticle

            usepackageamsmath
            usepackageamssymb
            usepackagetikz-cd

            DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
            DeclareMathOperatordomdom
            DeclareMathOperatorobob

            begindocument

            Option 1: wide column separation specified by dimension
            beginequation*
            begintikzcd[column sep = 10em]
            E arrow[r, "e"] & displaystyleprod_i in
            ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
            arrow[r, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
            hom(mathcalE)rangle"] arrow[r, shift right, "langle F(u)
            pi_dom(u) mid u in
            hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
            & displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
            endtikzcd
            endequation*

            Option 2: let arrows cover two (or more) columns
            beginequation*
            begintikzcd[column sep = huge]
            E arrow[r, "e"]
            & displaystyleprod_i in ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
            arrow[rr, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
            hom(mathcalE)rangle"]
            arrow[rr, shift right, "langle F(u) pi_dom(u)
            mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
            && displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
            endtikzcd
            endequation*

            enddocument


            The first is simply to specify the column sep as a dimension.
            The second is to add an extra column under the long arrows, so you have



            A arrow[r] & B arrow[rr] && C


            instead of



            A arrow[r] & B arrow[r] & C


            You can make this wider by using more columns



            A arrow[r] & B arrow[rrr] &&& C


            etc.



            Note I have recoded much of your mathematics.






            share|improve this answer













            Here are two different ways



            enter image description here



            documentclassarticle

            usepackageamsmath
            usepackageamssymb
            usepackagetikz-cd

            DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
            DeclareMathOperatordomdom
            DeclareMathOperatorobob

            begindocument

            Option 1: wide column separation specified by dimension
            beginequation*
            begintikzcd[column sep = 10em]
            E arrow[r, "e"] & displaystyleprod_i in
            ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
            arrow[r, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
            hom(mathcalE)rangle"] arrow[r, shift right, "langle F(u)
            pi_dom(u) mid u in
            hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
            & displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
            endtikzcd
            endequation*

            Option 2: let arrows cover two (or more) columns
            beginequation*
            begintikzcd[column sep = huge]
            E arrow[r, "e"]
            & displaystyleprod_i in ob(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(i)
            arrow[rr, shift left, " langlepi_cod(u) mid u in
            hom(mathcalE)rangle"]
            arrow[rr, shift right, "langle F(u) pi_dom(u)
            mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"']
            && displaystyleprod_u in hom(mathcalE) mkern-12mu F(cod(u))
            endtikzcd
            endequation*

            enddocument


            The first is simply to specify the column sep as a dimension.
            The second is to add an extra column under the long arrows, so you have



            A arrow[r] & B arrow[rr] && C


            instead of



            A arrow[r] & B arrow[r] & C


            You can make this wider by using more columns



            A arrow[r] & B arrow[rrr] &&& C


            etc.



            Note I have recoded much of your mathematics.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 19 hours ago









            Andrew SwannAndrew Swann

            77.9k9132332




            77.9k9132332





















                7














                Add a width specification:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd

                DeclareMathOperatorobob
                DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

                begindocument

                begintikzcd
                E arrow[r, "e"] &
                prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
                arrow[
                r, shift left,
                "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
                ]
                arrow[
                r, shift right,
                "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
                ] &[8em]
                prod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                Note the adjustments I made:




                • <...> should be langle...rangle


                • Pi should be prod


                • | should be mid

                • ob, dom and cod should be typeset upright

                enter image description here



                A possible alternative with smashoperator that makes the diagram shorter:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath,mathtools
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd

                DeclareMathOperatorobob
                DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

                begindocument

                begintikzcd
                E arrow[r, "e"] &
                smashoperatorprod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
                arrow[
                r, shift left,
                "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
                ]
                arrow[
                r, shift right,
                "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
                ] &[10em]
                smashoperatorprod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer


















                • 2





                  Eventually, someone who knows the &[<lenght>] option, you beat me by a second, lol!

                  – CarLaTeX
                  18 hours ago











                • +1 Of course, loading amsmath is not needed once you load mathtools.

                  – Andrew Swann
                  18 hours ago















                7














                Add a width specification:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd

                DeclareMathOperatorobob
                DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

                begindocument

                begintikzcd
                E arrow[r, "e"] &
                prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
                arrow[
                r, shift left,
                "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
                ]
                arrow[
                r, shift right,
                "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
                ] &[8em]
                prod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                Note the adjustments I made:




                • <...> should be langle...rangle


                • Pi should be prod


                • | should be mid

                • ob, dom and cod should be typeset upright

                enter image description here



                A possible alternative with smashoperator that makes the diagram shorter:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath,mathtools
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd

                DeclareMathOperatorobob
                DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

                begindocument

                begintikzcd
                E arrow[r, "e"] &
                smashoperatorprod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
                arrow[
                r, shift left,
                "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
                ]
                arrow[
                r, shift right,
                "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
                ] &[10em]
                smashoperatorprod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer


















                • 2





                  Eventually, someone who knows the &[<lenght>] option, you beat me by a second, lol!

                  – CarLaTeX
                  18 hours ago











                • +1 Of course, loading amsmath is not needed once you load mathtools.

                  – Andrew Swann
                  18 hours ago













                7












                7








                7







                Add a width specification:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd

                DeclareMathOperatorobob
                DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

                begindocument

                begintikzcd
                E arrow[r, "e"] &
                prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
                arrow[
                r, shift left,
                "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
                ]
                arrow[
                r, shift right,
                "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
                ] &[8em]
                prod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                Note the adjustments I made:




                • <...> should be langle...rangle


                • Pi should be prod


                • | should be mid

                • ob, dom and cod should be typeset upright

                enter image description here



                A possible alternative with smashoperator that makes the diagram shorter:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath,mathtools
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd

                DeclareMathOperatorobob
                DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

                begindocument

                begintikzcd
                E arrow[r, "e"] &
                smashoperatorprod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
                arrow[
                r, shift left,
                "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
                ]
                arrow[
                r, shift right,
                "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
                ] &[10em]
                smashoperatorprod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer













                Add a width specification:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd

                DeclareMathOperatorobob
                DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

                begindocument

                begintikzcd
                E arrow[r, "e"] &
                prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
                arrow[
                r, shift left,
                "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
                ]
                arrow[
                r, shift right,
                "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
                ] &[8em]
                prod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                Note the adjustments I made:




                • <...> should be langle...rangle


                • Pi should be prod


                • | should be mid

                • ob, dom and cod should be typeset upright

                enter image description here



                A possible alternative with smashoperator that makes the diagram shorter:



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath,mathtools
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd

                DeclareMathOperatorobob
                DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                DeclareMathOperatorcodcod

                begindocument

                begintikzcd
                E arrow[r, "e"] &
                smashoperatorprod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)
                arrow[
                r, shift left,
                "langlepi_cod(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"
                ]
                arrow[
                r, shift right,
                "langle F(u)pi_dom(u) mid u in hom(mathcalE)rangle"'
                ] &[10em]
                smashoperatorprod_u in hom(mathcalE) F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                enter image description here







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 19 hours ago









                egregegreg

                731k8819293246




                731k8819293246







                • 2





                  Eventually, someone who knows the &[<lenght>] option, you beat me by a second, lol!

                  – CarLaTeX
                  18 hours ago











                • +1 Of course, loading amsmath is not needed once you load mathtools.

                  – Andrew Swann
                  18 hours ago












                • 2





                  Eventually, someone who knows the &[<lenght>] option, you beat me by a second, lol!

                  – CarLaTeX
                  18 hours ago











                • +1 Of course, loading amsmath is not needed once you load mathtools.

                  – Andrew Swann
                  18 hours ago







                2




                2





                Eventually, someone who knows the &[<lenght>] option, you beat me by a second, lol!

                – CarLaTeX
                18 hours ago





                Eventually, someone who knows the &[<lenght>] option, you beat me by a second, lol!

                – CarLaTeX
                18 hours ago













                +1 Of course, loading amsmath is not needed once you load mathtools.

                – Andrew Swann
                18 hours ago





                +1 Of course, loading amsmath is not needed once you load mathtools.

                – Andrew Swann
                18 hours ago











                4














                Add an empty column between columns 2 and 3. I also added some improvements to the diagram.



                documentclassarticle
                usepackageamsmath
                usepackageamssymb
                usepackagetikz-cd
                usepackagefullpage
                usepackageamsthm
                usepackageadjustbox

                begindocument

                begintikzcd[column sep= huge, row sep=huge]
                E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[rr, shift left=1ex, "
                langlepi_cod(u) , "] arrow[rr, shift right=1ex, "langle F(u)
                pi_dom(u) , "'] & & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
                F(cod(u))
                endtikzcd

                enddocument


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer



























                  4














                  Add an empty column between columns 2 and 3. I also added some improvements to the diagram.



                  documentclassarticle
                  usepackageamsmath
                  usepackageamssymb
                  usepackagetikz-cd
                  usepackagefullpage
                  usepackageamsthm
                  usepackageadjustbox

                  begindocument

                  begintikzcd[column sep= huge, row sep=huge]
                  E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[rr, shift left=1ex, "
                  langlepi_cod(u) , "] arrow[rr, shift right=1ex, "langle F(u)
                  pi_dom(u) , "'] & & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
                  F(cod(u))
                  endtikzcd

                  enddocument


                  enter image description here






                  share|improve this answer

























                    4












                    4








                    4







                    Add an empty column between columns 2 and 3. I also added some improvements to the diagram.



                    documentclassarticle
                    usepackageamsmath
                    usepackageamssymb
                    usepackagetikz-cd
                    usepackagefullpage
                    usepackageamsthm
                    usepackageadjustbox

                    begindocument

                    begintikzcd[column sep= huge, row sep=huge]
                    E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[rr, shift left=1ex, "
                    langlepi_cod(u) , "] arrow[rr, shift right=1ex, "langle F(u)
                    pi_dom(u) , "'] & & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
                    F(cod(u))
                    endtikzcd

                    enddocument


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer













                    Add an empty column between columns 2 and 3. I also added some improvements to the diagram.



                    documentclassarticle
                    usepackageamsmath
                    usepackageamssymb
                    usepackagetikz-cd
                    usepackagefullpage
                    usepackageamsthm
                    usepackageadjustbox

                    begindocument

                    begintikzcd[column sep= huge, row sep=huge]
                    E arrow[r, "e"] & Pi_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i) arrow[rr, shift left=1ex, "
                    langlepi_cod(u) , "] arrow[rr, shift right=1ex, "langle F(u)
                    pi_dom(u) , "'] & & Pi_u in hom(mathcalE)
                    F(cod(u))
                    endtikzcd

                    enddocument


                    enter image description here







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 19 hours ago









                    BernardBernard

                    175k776207




                    175k776207





















                        4














                        I remade everything in normal TikZ and correct (many) typos. Also, take note that I use langle and rangle instead of < and >. A curve is always more readable than a straight line in this case in my opinion.



                        documentclassstandalone
                        usepackageamsmath
                        usepackagetikz
                        usetikzlibrarypositioning
                        DeclareMathOperatorobob
                        DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
                        DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                        begindocument
                        begintikzpicture[>=stealth]
                        node (mid) $prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)$;
                        node[left=1cm of mid] (left) $E$;
                        node[right=4cm of mid] (right) $prod_u in hom(mathcalE)F(cod(u))$;
                        draw[->] (left)--(mid) node[midway,above] $scriptstyle e$;
                        draw[->] ([yshift=.2em]mid.east) to[bend left=5] node[midway,above] $scriptstylelanglepi_cod(u) ([yshift=.2em]right.west);
                        draw[->] ([yshift=-.2em]mid.east) to[bend right=5] node[midway,below] $scriptstylelangle F(u)pi_dom(u) ([yshift=-.2em]right.west);
                        endtikzpicture
                        enddocument


                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer





























                          4














                          I remade everything in normal TikZ and correct (many) typos. Also, take note that I use langle and rangle instead of < and >. A curve is always more readable than a straight line in this case in my opinion.



                          documentclassstandalone
                          usepackageamsmath
                          usepackagetikz
                          usetikzlibrarypositioning
                          DeclareMathOperatorobob
                          DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
                          DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                          begindocument
                          begintikzpicture[>=stealth]
                          node (mid) $prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)$;
                          node[left=1cm of mid] (left) $E$;
                          node[right=4cm of mid] (right) $prod_u in hom(mathcalE)F(cod(u))$;
                          draw[->] (left)--(mid) node[midway,above] $scriptstyle e$;
                          draw[->] ([yshift=.2em]mid.east) to[bend left=5] node[midway,above] $scriptstylelanglepi_cod(u) ([yshift=.2em]right.west);
                          draw[->] ([yshift=-.2em]mid.east) to[bend right=5] node[midway,below] $scriptstylelangle F(u)pi_dom(u) ([yshift=-.2em]right.west);
                          endtikzpicture
                          enddocument


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer



























                            4












                            4








                            4







                            I remade everything in normal TikZ and correct (many) typos. Also, take note that I use langle and rangle instead of < and >. A curve is always more readable than a straight line in this case in my opinion.



                            documentclassstandalone
                            usepackageamsmath
                            usepackagetikz
                            usetikzlibrarypositioning
                            DeclareMathOperatorobob
                            DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
                            DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                            begindocument
                            begintikzpicture[>=stealth]
                            node (mid) $prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)$;
                            node[left=1cm of mid] (left) $E$;
                            node[right=4cm of mid] (right) $prod_u in hom(mathcalE)F(cod(u))$;
                            draw[->] (left)--(mid) node[midway,above] $scriptstyle e$;
                            draw[->] ([yshift=.2em]mid.east) to[bend left=5] node[midway,above] $scriptstylelanglepi_cod(u) ([yshift=.2em]right.west);
                            draw[->] ([yshift=-.2em]mid.east) to[bend right=5] node[midway,below] $scriptstylelangle F(u)pi_dom(u) ([yshift=-.2em]right.west);
                            endtikzpicture
                            enddocument


                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer















                            I remade everything in normal TikZ and correct (many) typos. Also, take note that I use langle and rangle instead of < and >. A curve is always more readable than a straight line in this case in my opinion.



                            documentclassstandalone
                            usepackageamsmath
                            usepackagetikz
                            usetikzlibrarypositioning
                            DeclareMathOperatorobob
                            DeclareMathOperatorcodcod
                            DeclareMathOperatordomdom
                            begindocument
                            begintikzpicture[>=stealth]
                            node (mid) $prod_i in ob(mathcalE) F(i)$;
                            node[left=1cm of mid] (left) $E$;
                            node[right=4cm of mid] (right) $prod_u in hom(mathcalE)F(cod(u))$;
                            draw[->] (left)--(mid) node[midway,above] $scriptstyle e$;
                            draw[->] ([yshift=.2em]mid.east) to[bend left=5] node[midway,above] $scriptstylelanglepi_cod(u) ([yshift=.2em]right.west);
                            draw[->] ([yshift=-.2em]mid.east) to[bend right=5] node[midway,below] $scriptstylelangle F(u)pi_dom(u) ([yshift=-.2em]right.west);
                            endtikzpicture
                            enddocument


                            enter image description here







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 19 hours ago

























                            answered 19 hours ago









                            JouleVJouleV

                            9,91322558




                            9,91322558



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482737%2fgetting-extremely-large-arrows-with-tikzcd%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                                Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?