How to detect integer overflow in C [duplicate]How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?Detecting signed overflow in C/C++How do I check if A+B exceed long long? (both A and B is long long)Test for overflow in integer additionHow do you set, clear, and toggle a single bit?How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?Improve INSERT-per-second performance of SQLite?Catch and compute overflow during multiplication of two large integersWhen to address integer overflow in CDetecting signed overflow in C/C++How to find (all) integer overflows in a C program?Speed comparison with Project Euler: C vs Python vs Erlang vs HaskellHow to check if overflow occured?automatic overflow detection in C++?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?

What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?

How to stretch the corners of this image so that it looks like a perfect rectangle?

One verb to replace 'be a member of' a club

What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?

How to Prove P(a) → ∀x(P(x) ∨ ¬(x = a)) using Natural Deduction

How to enclose theorems and definition in rectangles?

Is "/bin/[.exe" a legitimate file? [Cygwin, Windows 10]

What Exploit Are These User Agents Trying to Use?

Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions

Was the Stack Exchange "Happy April Fools" page fitting with the '90's code?

Why were 5.25" floppy drives cheaper than 8"?

If a warlock makes a Dancing Sword their pact weapon, is there a way to prevent it from disappearing if it's farther away for more than a minute?

Partial fraction expansion confusion

Placement of More Information/Help Icon button for Radio Buttons

Is this draw by repetition?

Do creatures with a listed speed of "0 ft., fly 30 ft. (hover)" ever touch the ground?

What is an equivalently powerful replacement spell for the Yuan-Ti's Suggestion spell?

How to remove border from elements in the last row?

What historical events would have to change in order to make 19th century "steampunk" technology possible?

Notepad++ delete until colon for every line with replace all



How to detect integer overflow in C [duplicate]


How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?Detecting signed overflow in C/C++How do I check if A+B exceed long long? (both A and B is long long)Test for overflow in integer additionHow do you set, clear, and toggle a single bit?How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?Improve INSERT-per-second performance of SQLite?Catch and compute overflow during multiplication of two large integersWhen to address integer overflow in CDetecting signed overflow in C/C++How to find (all) integer overflows in a C program?Speed comparison with Project Euler: C vs Python vs Erlang vs HaskellHow to check if overflow occured?automatic overflow detection in C++?













15
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Detecting signed overflow in C/C++

    12 answers



  • How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?

    31 answers



We know CPython promotes integers to long integers (which allow arbitrary-precision arithmetic) silently when the number gets bigger.



How can we detect overflow of int and long long in pure C?










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by sleske, ead, phuclv, Cody Gray 9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 3





    It's very tricky since you just can't add two numbers and check if the value is above some threshold (because signed integer arithmetic overflow and such). A simple solution might be to check if x (the value you want to check) is above a specific threshold, or if adding one goes above a threshold. If it does and the other number you want to add is larger than one, then you have an overflow situation.

    – Some programmer dude
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    Nitpick, but, it was CPython 2.7 that did this. CPython 3 doesn't "promote" anything, even internally there is just one type.

    – Antti Haapala
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    there are a lot of duplicates depending on what you want to do with the values (add/sub/mul/div/...?) How to check if A+B exceed long long? (both A and B is long long), Detecting signed overflow in C/C++, Test for overflow in integer addition

    – phuclv
    12 hours ago












  • and add 1 more codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/37177/…

    – NoChance
    11 hours ago















15
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Detecting signed overflow in C/C++

    12 answers



  • How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?

    31 answers



We know CPython promotes integers to long integers (which allow arbitrary-precision arithmetic) silently when the number gets bigger.



How can we detect overflow of int and long long in pure C?










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by sleske, ead, phuclv, Cody Gray 9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 3





    It's very tricky since you just can't add two numbers and check if the value is above some threshold (because signed integer arithmetic overflow and such). A simple solution might be to check if x (the value you want to check) is above a specific threshold, or if adding one goes above a threshold. If it does and the other number you want to add is larger than one, then you have an overflow situation.

    – Some programmer dude
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    Nitpick, but, it was CPython 2.7 that did this. CPython 3 doesn't "promote" anything, even internally there is just one type.

    – Antti Haapala
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    there are a lot of duplicates depending on what you want to do with the values (add/sub/mul/div/...?) How to check if A+B exceed long long? (both A and B is long long), Detecting signed overflow in C/C++, Test for overflow in integer addition

    – phuclv
    12 hours ago












  • and add 1 more codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/37177/…

    – NoChance
    11 hours ago













15












15








15


1







This question already has an answer here:



  • Detecting signed overflow in C/C++

    12 answers



  • How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?

    31 answers



We know CPython promotes integers to long integers (which allow arbitrary-precision arithmetic) silently when the number gets bigger.



How can we detect overflow of int and long long in pure C?










share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:



  • Detecting signed overflow in C/C++

    12 answers



  • How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?

    31 answers



We know CPython promotes integers to long integers (which allow arbitrary-precision arithmetic) silently when the number gets bigger.



How can we detect overflow of int and long long in pure C?





This question already has an answer here:



  • Detecting signed overflow in C/C++

    12 answers



  • How do I detect unsigned integer multiply overflow?

    31 answers







c overflow






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Peter Mortensen

13.9k1987113




13.9k1987113










asked 19 hours ago









DeanDean

1004




1004




marked as duplicate by sleske, ead, phuclv, Cody Gray 9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by sleske, ead, phuclv, Cody Gray 9 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 3





    It's very tricky since you just can't add two numbers and check if the value is above some threshold (because signed integer arithmetic overflow and such). A simple solution might be to check if x (the value you want to check) is above a specific threshold, or if adding one goes above a threshold. If it does and the other number you want to add is larger than one, then you have an overflow situation.

    – Some programmer dude
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    Nitpick, but, it was CPython 2.7 that did this. CPython 3 doesn't "promote" anything, even internally there is just one type.

    – Antti Haapala
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    there are a lot of duplicates depending on what you want to do with the values (add/sub/mul/div/...?) How to check if A+B exceed long long? (both A and B is long long), Detecting signed overflow in C/C++, Test for overflow in integer addition

    – phuclv
    12 hours ago












  • and add 1 more codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/37177/…

    – NoChance
    11 hours ago












  • 3





    It's very tricky since you just can't add two numbers and check if the value is above some threshold (because signed integer arithmetic overflow and such). A simple solution might be to check if x (the value you want to check) is above a specific threshold, or if adding one goes above a threshold. If it does and the other number you want to add is larger than one, then you have an overflow situation.

    – Some programmer dude
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    Nitpick, but, it was CPython 2.7 that did this. CPython 3 doesn't "promote" anything, even internally there is just one type.

    – Antti Haapala
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    there are a lot of duplicates depending on what you want to do with the values (add/sub/mul/div/...?) How to check if A+B exceed long long? (both A and B is long long), Detecting signed overflow in C/C++, Test for overflow in integer addition

    – phuclv
    12 hours ago












  • and add 1 more codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/37177/…

    – NoChance
    11 hours ago







3




3





It's very tricky since you just can't add two numbers and check if the value is above some threshold (because signed integer arithmetic overflow and such). A simple solution might be to check if x (the value you want to check) is above a specific threshold, or if adding one goes above a threshold. If it does and the other number you want to add is larger than one, then you have an overflow situation.

– Some programmer dude
19 hours ago






It's very tricky since you just can't add two numbers and check if the value is above some threshold (because signed integer arithmetic overflow and such). A simple solution might be to check if x (the value you want to check) is above a specific threshold, or if adding one goes above a threshold. If it does and the other number you want to add is larger than one, then you have an overflow situation.

– Some programmer dude
19 hours ago





1




1





Nitpick, but, it was CPython 2.7 that did this. CPython 3 doesn't "promote" anything, even internally there is just one type.

– Antti Haapala
13 hours ago





Nitpick, but, it was CPython 2.7 that did this. CPython 3 doesn't "promote" anything, even internally there is just one type.

– Antti Haapala
13 hours ago




1




1





there are a lot of duplicates depending on what you want to do with the values (add/sub/mul/div/...?) How to check if A+B exceed long long? (both A and B is long long), Detecting signed overflow in C/C++, Test for overflow in integer addition

– phuclv
12 hours ago






there are a lot of duplicates depending on what you want to do with the values (add/sub/mul/div/...?) How to check if A+B exceed long long? (both A and B is long long), Detecting signed overflow in C/C++, Test for overflow in integer addition

– phuclv
12 hours ago














and add 1 more codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/37177/…

– NoChance
11 hours ago





and add 1 more codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/37177/…

– NoChance
11 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















28














You cannot detect signed int overflow. You have to write your code to avoid it.



Signed int overflow is Undefined Behaviour and if it is present in your program, the program is invalid and the compiler is not required to generate any specific behaviour.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    You can check you input values before doing a calculation to prevent overflow.

    – A.R.C.
    19 hours ago






  • 7





    I think, it would be nice and informative to explain why signed int overflow undefined, whereas unsigned apperantly isn't..

    – hetepeperfan
    19 hours ago







  • 6





    @hetepeperfan It's because that's what the language standard says.

    – Sneftel
    17 hours ago







  • 6





    @sneftel thats an authoritative argument lacking an authoritative source, despise it is probably correct. On top of that, standards make more sense to people, once they start to understand the language, which is perhaps a reason they visit stackoverflow in the first place.

    – hetepeperfan
    17 hours ago






  • 5





    @hetepeperfan the reason for why the standard is written as it is, is for the most part outside the scope of Stack Overflow.

    – Antti Haapala
    13 hours ago


















16














You can predict signed int overflow but attempting to detect it after the summation is too late. You have to test for possible overflow before you do a signed addition.



It's not possible to avoid undefined behaviour by testing for it after the summation. If the addition overflows then there is already undefined behaviour.



If it were me, I'd do something like this:



#include <limits.h>

int safe_add(int a, int b)

if (a >= 0)
if (b > (INT_MAX - a))
/* handle overflow */

else
if (b < (INT_MIN - a))
/* handle underflow */


return a + b;



Refer this paper for more information. You can also find why unsigned integer overflow is not undefined behaviour and what could be portability issues in the same paper.



EDIT:



GCC and other compilers have some provisions to detect the overflow. For example, GCC has following built-in functions allow performing simple arithmetic operations together with checking whether the operations overflowed.



bool __builtin_add_overflow (type1 a, type2 b, type3 *res)
bool __builtin_sadd_overflow (int a, int b, int *res)
bool __builtin_saddl_overflow (long int a, long int b, long int *res)
bool __builtin_saddll_overflow (long long int a, long long int b, long long int *res)
bool __builtin_uadd_overflow (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int *res)
bool __builtin_uaddl_overflow (unsigned long int a, unsigned long int b, unsigned long int *res)
bool __builtin_uaddll_overflow (unsigned long long int a, unsigned long long int b, unsigned long long int *res)


Visit this link.






share|improve this answer

























  • Why extra parentheses? Also you could save one test on average with if (a >= 0) test overflow else test underflow return a + b;

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago












  • @chqrlie that is not sufficient because there is no possibility of overflow when a == 0.

    – Antti Haapala
    18 hours ago











  • It is not necessary to test overflow if a == 0 but testing a just once saves one comparison if a < 0, which is half the cases.

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago






  • 8





    Also, both are technically called overflow. Underflow means that the value is too small in magnitude to be representable in a floating point variable.

    – Antti Haapala
    18 hours ago






  • 3





    @AnttiHaapala it does not ignore the case a == 0 where there is no possible overflow, it just handles it differently.

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago


















8














Signed operands must be tested before the addition is performed. Here is a safe addition function with 2 comparisons in all cases:



#include <limits.h>

int safe_add(int a, int b)
if (a >= 0)
if (b > INT_MAX - a)
/* handle overflow */
else
return a + b;

else
if (b < INT_MIN - a)
/* handle negative overflow */
else
return a + b;





If the type long long is known to have a larger range than type int, you could use this approach, which might prove faster:



#include <limits.h>

int safe_add(int a, int b)





share|improve this answer































    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    28














    You cannot detect signed int overflow. You have to write your code to avoid it.



    Signed int overflow is Undefined Behaviour and if it is present in your program, the program is invalid and the compiler is not required to generate any specific behaviour.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      You can check you input values before doing a calculation to prevent overflow.

      – A.R.C.
      19 hours ago






    • 7





      I think, it would be nice and informative to explain why signed int overflow undefined, whereas unsigned apperantly isn't..

      – hetepeperfan
      19 hours ago







    • 6





      @hetepeperfan It's because that's what the language standard says.

      – Sneftel
      17 hours ago







    • 6





      @sneftel thats an authoritative argument lacking an authoritative source, despise it is probably correct. On top of that, standards make more sense to people, once they start to understand the language, which is perhaps a reason they visit stackoverflow in the first place.

      – hetepeperfan
      17 hours ago






    • 5





      @hetepeperfan the reason for why the standard is written as it is, is for the most part outside the scope of Stack Overflow.

      – Antti Haapala
      13 hours ago















    28














    You cannot detect signed int overflow. You have to write your code to avoid it.



    Signed int overflow is Undefined Behaviour and if it is present in your program, the program is invalid and the compiler is not required to generate any specific behaviour.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      You can check you input values before doing a calculation to prevent overflow.

      – A.R.C.
      19 hours ago






    • 7





      I think, it would be nice and informative to explain why signed int overflow undefined, whereas unsigned apperantly isn't..

      – hetepeperfan
      19 hours ago







    • 6





      @hetepeperfan It's because that's what the language standard says.

      – Sneftel
      17 hours ago







    • 6





      @sneftel thats an authoritative argument lacking an authoritative source, despise it is probably correct. On top of that, standards make more sense to people, once they start to understand the language, which is perhaps a reason they visit stackoverflow in the first place.

      – hetepeperfan
      17 hours ago






    • 5





      @hetepeperfan the reason for why the standard is written as it is, is for the most part outside the scope of Stack Overflow.

      – Antti Haapala
      13 hours ago













    28












    28








    28







    You cannot detect signed int overflow. You have to write your code to avoid it.



    Signed int overflow is Undefined Behaviour and if it is present in your program, the program is invalid and the compiler is not required to generate any specific behaviour.






    share|improve this answer













    You cannot detect signed int overflow. You have to write your code to avoid it.



    Signed int overflow is Undefined Behaviour and if it is present in your program, the program is invalid and the compiler is not required to generate any specific behaviour.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 19 hours ago









    Jesper JuhlJesper Juhl

    17.4k32647




    17.4k32647







    • 3





      You can check you input values before doing a calculation to prevent overflow.

      – A.R.C.
      19 hours ago






    • 7





      I think, it would be nice and informative to explain why signed int overflow undefined, whereas unsigned apperantly isn't..

      – hetepeperfan
      19 hours ago







    • 6





      @hetepeperfan It's because that's what the language standard says.

      – Sneftel
      17 hours ago







    • 6





      @sneftel thats an authoritative argument lacking an authoritative source, despise it is probably correct. On top of that, standards make more sense to people, once they start to understand the language, which is perhaps a reason they visit stackoverflow in the first place.

      – hetepeperfan
      17 hours ago






    • 5





      @hetepeperfan the reason for why the standard is written as it is, is for the most part outside the scope of Stack Overflow.

      – Antti Haapala
      13 hours ago












    • 3





      You can check you input values before doing a calculation to prevent overflow.

      – A.R.C.
      19 hours ago






    • 7





      I think, it would be nice and informative to explain why signed int overflow undefined, whereas unsigned apperantly isn't..

      – hetepeperfan
      19 hours ago







    • 6





      @hetepeperfan It's because that's what the language standard says.

      – Sneftel
      17 hours ago







    • 6





      @sneftel thats an authoritative argument lacking an authoritative source, despise it is probably correct. On top of that, standards make more sense to people, once they start to understand the language, which is perhaps a reason they visit stackoverflow in the first place.

      – hetepeperfan
      17 hours ago






    • 5





      @hetepeperfan the reason for why the standard is written as it is, is for the most part outside the scope of Stack Overflow.

      – Antti Haapala
      13 hours ago







    3




    3





    You can check you input values before doing a calculation to prevent overflow.

    – A.R.C.
    19 hours ago





    You can check you input values before doing a calculation to prevent overflow.

    – A.R.C.
    19 hours ago




    7




    7





    I think, it would be nice and informative to explain why signed int overflow undefined, whereas unsigned apperantly isn't..

    – hetepeperfan
    19 hours ago






    I think, it would be nice and informative to explain why signed int overflow undefined, whereas unsigned apperantly isn't..

    – hetepeperfan
    19 hours ago





    6




    6





    @hetepeperfan It's because that's what the language standard says.

    – Sneftel
    17 hours ago






    @hetepeperfan It's because that's what the language standard says.

    – Sneftel
    17 hours ago





    6




    6





    @sneftel thats an authoritative argument lacking an authoritative source, despise it is probably correct. On top of that, standards make more sense to people, once they start to understand the language, which is perhaps a reason they visit stackoverflow in the first place.

    – hetepeperfan
    17 hours ago





    @sneftel thats an authoritative argument lacking an authoritative source, despise it is probably correct. On top of that, standards make more sense to people, once they start to understand the language, which is perhaps a reason they visit stackoverflow in the first place.

    – hetepeperfan
    17 hours ago




    5




    5





    @hetepeperfan the reason for why the standard is written as it is, is for the most part outside the scope of Stack Overflow.

    – Antti Haapala
    13 hours ago





    @hetepeperfan the reason for why the standard is written as it is, is for the most part outside the scope of Stack Overflow.

    – Antti Haapala
    13 hours ago













    16














    You can predict signed int overflow but attempting to detect it after the summation is too late. You have to test for possible overflow before you do a signed addition.



    It's not possible to avoid undefined behaviour by testing for it after the summation. If the addition overflows then there is already undefined behaviour.



    If it were me, I'd do something like this:



    #include <limits.h>

    int safe_add(int a, int b)

    if (a >= 0)
    if (b > (INT_MAX - a))
    /* handle overflow */

    else
    if (b < (INT_MIN - a))
    /* handle underflow */


    return a + b;



    Refer this paper for more information. You can also find why unsigned integer overflow is not undefined behaviour and what could be portability issues in the same paper.



    EDIT:



    GCC and other compilers have some provisions to detect the overflow. For example, GCC has following built-in functions allow performing simple arithmetic operations together with checking whether the operations overflowed.



    bool __builtin_add_overflow (type1 a, type2 b, type3 *res)
    bool __builtin_sadd_overflow (int a, int b, int *res)
    bool __builtin_saddl_overflow (long int a, long int b, long int *res)
    bool __builtin_saddll_overflow (long long int a, long long int b, long long int *res)
    bool __builtin_uadd_overflow (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int *res)
    bool __builtin_uaddl_overflow (unsigned long int a, unsigned long int b, unsigned long int *res)
    bool __builtin_uaddll_overflow (unsigned long long int a, unsigned long long int b, unsigned long long int *res)


    Visit this link.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Why extra parentheses? Also you could save one test on average with if (a >= 0) test overflow else test underflow return a + b;

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago












    • @chqrlie that is not sufficient because there is no possibility of overflow when a == 0.

      – Antti Haapala
      18 hours ago











    • It is not necessary to test overflow if a == 0 but testing a just once saves one comparison if a < 0, which is half the cases.

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago






    • 8





      Also, both are technically called overflow. Underflow means that the value is too small in magnitude to be representable in a floating point variable.

      – Antti Haapala
      18 hours ago






    • 3





      @AnttiHaapala it does not ignore the case a == 0 where there is no possible overflow, it just handles it differently.

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago















    16














    You can predict signed int overflow but attempting to detect it after the summation is too late. You have to test for possible overflow before you do a signed addition.



    It's not possible to avoid undefined behaviour by testing for it after the summation. If the addition overflows then there is already undefined behaviour.



    If it were me, I'd do something like this:



    #include <limits.h>

    int safe_add(int a, int b)

    if (a >= 0)
    if (b > (INT_MAX - a))
    /* handle overflow */

    else
    if (b < (INT_MIN - a))
    /* handle underflow */


    return a + b;



    Refer this paper for more information. You can also find why unsigned integer overflow is not undefined behaviour and what could be portability issues in the same paper.



    EDIT:



    GCC and other compilers have some provisions to detect the overflow. For example, GCC has following built-in functions allow performing simple arithmetic operations together with checking whether the operations overflowed.



    bool __builtin_add_overflow (type1 a, type2 b, type3 *res)
    bool __builtin_sadd_overflow (int a, int b, int *res)
    bool __builtin_saddl_overflow (long int a, long int b, long int *res)
    bool __builtin_saddll_overflow (long long int a, long long int b, long long int *res)
    bool __builtin_uadd_overflow (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int *res)
    bool __builtin_uaddl_overflow (unsigned long int a, unsigned long int b, unsigned long int *res)
    bool __builtin_uaddll_overflow (unsigned long long int a, unsigned long long int b, unsigned long long int *res)


    Visit this link.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Why extra parentheses? Also you could save one test on average with if (a >= 0) test overflow else test underflow return a + b;

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago












    • @chqrlie that is not sufficient because there is no possibility of overflow when a == 0.

      – Antti Haapala
      18 hours ago











    • It is not necessary to test overflow if a == 0 but testing a just once saves one comparison if a < 0, which is half the cases.

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago






    • 8





      Also, both are technically called overflow. Underflow means that the value is too small in magnitude to be representable in a floating point variable.

      – Antti Haapala
      18 hours ago






    • 3





      @AnttiHaapala it does not ignore the case a == 0 where there is no possible overflow, it just handles it differently.

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago













    16












    16








    16







    You can predict signed int overflow but attempting to detect it after the summation is too late. You have to test for possible overflow before you do a signed addition.



    It's not possible to avoid undefined behaviour by testing for it after the summation. If the addition overflows then there is already undefined behaviour.



    If it were me, I'd do something like this:



    #include <limits.h>

    int safe_add(int a, int b)

    if (a >= 0)
    if (b > (INT_MAX - a))
    /* handle overflow */

    else
    if (b < (INT_MIN - a))
    /* handle underflow */


    return a + b;



    Refer this paper for more information. You can also find why unsigned integer overflow is not undefined behaviour and what could be portability issues in the same paper.



    EDIT:



    GCC and other compilers have some provisions to detect the overflow. For example, GCC has following built-in functions allow performing simple arithmetic operations together with checking whether the operations overflowed.



    bool __builtin_add_overflow (type1 a, type2 b, type3 *res)
    bool __builtin_sadd_overflow (int a, int b, int *res)
    bool __builtin_saddl_overflow (long int a, long int b, long int *res)
    bool __builtin_saddll_overflow (long long int a, long long int b, long long int *res)
    bool __builtin_uadd_overflow (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int *res)
    bool __builtin_uaddl_overflow (unsigned long int a, unsigned long int b, unsigned long int *res)
    bool __builtin_uaddll_overflow (unsigned long long int a, unsigned long long int b, unsigned long long int *res)


    Visit this link.






    share|improve this answer















    You can predict signed int overflow but attempting to detect it after the summation is too late. You have to test for possible overflow before you do a signed addition.



    It's not possible to avoid undefined behaviour by testing for it after the summation. If the addition overflows then there is already undefined behaviour.



    If it were me, I'd do something like this:



    #include <limits.h>

    int safe_add(int a, int b)

    if (a >= 0)
    if (b > (INT_MAX - a))
    /* handle overflow */

    else
    if (b < (INT_MIN - a))
    /* handle underflow */


    return a + b;



    Refer this paper for more information. You can also find why unsigned integer overflow is not undefined behaviour and what could be portability issues in the same paper.



    EDIT:



    GCC and other compilers have some provisions to detect the overflow. For example, GCC has following built-in functions allow performing simple arithmetic operations together with checking whether the operations overflowed.



    bool __builtin_add_overflow (type1 a, type2 b, type3 *res)
    bool __builtin_sadd_overflow (int a, int b, int *res)
    bool __builtin_saddl_overflow (long int a, long int b, long int *res)
    bool __builtin_saddll_overflow (long long int a, long long int b, long long int *res)
    bool __builtin_uadd_overflow (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int *res)
    bool __builtin_uaddl_overflow (unsigned long int a, unsigned long int b, unsigned long int *res)
    bool __builtin_uaddll_overflow (unsigned long long int a, unsigned long long int b, unsigned long long int *res)


    Visit this link.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 13 hours ago









    chqrlie

    62.4k848105




    62.4k848105










    answered 19 hours ago









    abhiaroraabhiarora

    2,49931533




    2,49931533












    • Why extra parentheses? Also you could save one test on average with if (a >= 0) test overflow else test underflow return a + b;

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago












    • @chqrlie that is not sufficient because there is no possibility of overflow when a == 0.

      – Antti Haapala
      18 hours ago











    • It is not necessary to test overflow if a == 0 but testing a just once saves one comparison if a < 0, which is half the cases.

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago






    • 8





      Also, both are technically called overflow. Underflow means that the value is too small in magnitude to be representable in a floating point variable.

      – Antti Haapala
      18 hours ago






    • 3





      @AnttiHaapala it does not ignore the case a == 0 where there is no possible overflow, it just handles it differently.

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago

















    • Why extra parentheses? Also you could save one test on average with if (a >= 0) test overflow else test underflow return a + b;

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago












    • @chqrlie that is not sufficient because there is no possibility of overflow when a == 0.

      – Antti Haapala
      18 hours ago











    • It is not necessary to test overflow if a == 0 but testing a just once saves one comparison if a < 0, which is half the cases.

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago






    • 8





      Also, both are technically called overflow. Underflow means that the value is too small in magnitude to be representable in a floating point variable.

      – Antti Haapala
      18 hours ago






    • 3





      @AnttiHaapala it does not ignore the case a == 0 where there is no possible overflow, it just handles it differently.

      – chqrlie
      18 hours ago
















    Why extra parentheses? Also you could save one test on average with if (a >= 0) test overflow else test underflow return a + b;

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago






    Why extra parentheses? Also you could save one test on average with if (a >= 0) test overflow else test underflow return a + b;

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago














    @chqrlie that is not sufficient because there is no possibility of overflow when a == 0.

    – Antti Haapala
    18 hours ago





    @chqrlie that is not sufficient because there is no possibility of overflow when a == 0.

    – Antti Haapala
    18 hours ago













    It is not necessary to test overflow if a == 0 but testing a just once saves one comparison if a < 0, which is half the cases.

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago





    It is not necessary to test overflow if a == 0 but testing a just once saves one comparison if a < 0, which is half the cases.

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago




    8




    8





    Also, both are technically called overflow. Underflow means that the value is too small in magnitude to be representable in a floating point variable.

    – Antti Haapala
    18 hours ago





    Also, both are technically called overflow. Underflow means that the value is too small in magnitude to be representable in a floating point variable.

    – Antti Haapala
    18 hours ago




    3




    3





    @AnttiHaapala it does not ignore the case a == 0 where there is no possible overflow, it just handles it differently.

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago





    @AnttiHaapala it does not ignore the case a == 0 where there is no possible overflow, it just handles it differently.

    – chqrlie
    18 hours ago











    8














    Signed operands must be tested before the addition is performed. Here is a safe addition function with 2 comparisons in all cases:



    #include <limits.h>

    int safe_add(int a, int b)
    if (a >= 0)
    if (b > INT_MAX - a)
    /* handle overflow */
    else
    return a + b;

    else
    if (b < INT_MIN - a)
    /* handle negative overflow */
    else
    return a + b;





    If the type long long is known to have a larger range than type int, you could use this approach, which might prove faster:



    #include <limits.h>

    int safe_add(int a, int b)





    share|improve this answer





























      8














      Signed operands must be tested before the addition is performed. Here is a safe addition function with 2 comparisons in all cases:



      #include <limits.h>

      int safe_add(int a, int b)
      if (a >= 0)
      if (b > INT_MAX - a)
      /* handle overflow */
      else
      return a + b;

      else
      if (b < INT_MIN - a)
      /* handle negative overflow */
      else
      return a + b;





      If the type long long is known to have a larger range than type int, you could use this approach, which might prove faster:



      #include <limits.h>

      int safe_add(int a, int b)





      share|improve this answer



























        8












        8








        8







        Signed operands must be tested before the addition is performed. Here is a safe addition function with 2 comparisons in all cases:



        #include <limits.h>

        int safe_add(int a, int b)
        if (a >= 0)
        if (b > INT_MAX - a)
        /* handle overflow */
        else
        return a + b;

        else
        if (b < INT_MIN - a)
        /* handle negative overflow */
        else
        return a + b;





        If the type long long is known to have a larger range than type int, you could use this approach, which might prove faster:



        #include <limits.h>

        int safe_add(int a, int b)





        share|improve this answer















        Signed operands must be tested before the addition is performed. Here is a safe addition function with 2 comparisons in all cases:



        #include <limits.h>

        int safe_add(int a, int b)
        if (a >= 0)
        if (b > INT_MAX - a)
        /* handle overflow */
        else
        return a + b;

        else
        if (b < INT_MIN - a)
        /* handle negative overflow */
        else
        return a + b;





        If the type long long is known to have a larger range than type int, you could use this approach, which might prove faster:



        #include <limits.h>

        int safe_add(int a, int b)






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 18 hours ago

























        answered 18 hours ago









        chqrliechqrlie

        62.4k848105




        62.4k848105













            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?