How to create a folder symlink that has a different name? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election Results Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” questionDynamic Symlinksunderstand the designation of symbolic linksSymlink all files in a directory with the entire directory treeSymlink aliasing files in subdirectories without changing current directoryCreate symlink tree in existing directoriesSymlink and folder permissionsWhat idempotent command can I use to make a symlink pointing to a directory?How to chdir to symlink source and not target in .screenrcHow to have tar follow all symlinks except one recursive symlinkHow to create a custom command or shortcut/symlink to run the standalone program?
Autumning in love
How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?
When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?
What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?
Geometric mean and geometric standard deviation
Area of a 2D convex hull
What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?
If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]
Losing the Initialization Vector in Cipher Block Chaining
What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?
Is there folklore associating late breastfeeding with low intelligence and/or gullibility?
Estimated State payment too big --> money back; + 2018 Tax Reform
Can I throw a longsword at someone?
How to say 'striped' in Latin
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Stars Make Stars
When is phishing education going too far?
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
I'm thinking of a number
Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?
Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?
How to create a folder symlink that has a different name?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election Results
Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” questionDynamic Symlinksunderstand the designation of symbolic linksSymlink all files in a directory with the entire directory treeSymlink aliasing files in subdirectories without changing current directoryCreate symlink tree in existing directoriesSymlink and folder permissionsWhat idempotent command can I use to make a symlink pointing to a directory?How to chdir to symlink source and not target in .screenrcHow to have tar follow all symlinks except one recursive symlinkHow to create a custom command or shortcut/symlink to run the standalone program?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I want to create a symlink
~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log
When I run
ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs
I get a symlink
~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log
which is not what I want.
I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.
symlink ln
New contributor
add a comment |
I want to create a symlink
~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log
When I run
ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs
I get a symlink
~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log
which is not what I want.
I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.
symlink ln
New contributor
add a comment |
I want to create a symlink
~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log
When I run
ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs
I get a symlink
~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log
which is not what I want.
I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.
symlink ln
New contributor
I want to create a symlink
~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log
When I run
ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs
I get a symlink
~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log
which is not what I want.
I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.
symlink ln
symlink ln
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
Kusalananda♦
141k18264440
141k18264440
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
ptkvskptkvsk
1112
1112
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs
. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.
Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs
is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.
I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
– ptkvsk
2 days ago
1
@ptkvsk The-F
flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The-f
flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The-f
option does not change this behaviour.
– Kusalananda♦
2 days ago
Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
– 0xSheepdog
2 days ago
add a comment |
Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.
add a comment |
As other answers say, there is already a directory there.
To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T
option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).
From the Gnu ln
manual (same for cp and mv).
ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)
Note form 1 without the -T
is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).
In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a /
at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T
option.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512139%2fhow-to-create-a-folder-symlink-that-has-a-different-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs
. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.
Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs
is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.
I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
– ptkvsk
2 days ago
1
@ptkvsk The-F
flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The-f
flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The-f
option does not change this behaviour.
– Kusalananda♦
2 days ago
Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
– 0xSheepdog
2 days ago
add a comment |
You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs
. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.
Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs
is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.
I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
– ptkvsk
2 days ago
1
@ptkvsk The-F
flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The-f
flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The-f
option does not change this behaviour.
– Kusalananda♦
2 days ago
Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
– 0xSheepdog
2 days ago
add a comment |
You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs
. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.
Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs
is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.
You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs
. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.
Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs
is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.
answered 2 days ago
Kusalananda♦Kusalananda
141k18264440
141k18264440
I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
– ptkvsk
2 days ago
1
@ptkvsk The-F
flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The-f
flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The-f
option does not change this behaviour.
– Kusalananda♦
2 days ago
Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
– 0xSheepdog
2 days ago
add a comment |
I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
– ptkvsk
2 days ago
1
@ptkvsk The-F
flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The-f
flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The-f
option does not change this behaviour.
– Kusalananda♦
2 days ago
Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
– 0xSheepdog
2 days ago
I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
– ptkvsk
2 days ago
I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?
– ptkvsk
2 days ago
1
1
@ptkvsk The
-F
flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f
flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f
option does not change this behaviour.– Kusalananda♦
2 days ago
@ptkvsk The
-F
flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f
flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f
option does not change this behaviour.– Kusalananda♦
2 days ago
Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
– 0xSheepdog
2 days ago
Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.
– 0xSheepdog
2 days ago
add a comment |
Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.
add a comment |
Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.
add a comment |
Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.
Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.
answered 2 days ago
XrXcaXrXca
913
913
add a comment |
add a comment |
As other answers say, there is already a directory there.
To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T
option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).
From the Gnu ln
manual (same for cp and mv).
ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)
Note form 1 without the -T
is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).
In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a /
at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T
option.
add a comment |
As other answers say, there is already a directory there.
To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T
option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).
From the Gnu ln
manual (same for cp and mv).
ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)
Note form 1 without the -T
is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).
In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a /
at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T
option.
add a comment |
As other answers say, there is already a directory there.
To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T
option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).
From the Gnu ln
manual (same for cp and mv).
ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)
Note form 1 without the -T
is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).
In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a /
at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T
option.
As other answers say, there is already a directory there.
To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T
option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).
From the Gnu ln
manual (same for cp and mv).
ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)
Note form 1 without the -T
is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).
In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a /
at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T
option.
answered 2 days ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.5k52662
12.5k52662
add a comment |
add a comment |
ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512139%2fhow-to-create-a-folder-symlink-that-has-a-different-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown