How to create a folder symlink that has a different name? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election Results Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” questionDynamic Symlinksunderstand the designation of symbolic linksSymlink all files in a directory with the entire directory treeSymlink aliasing files in subdirectories without changing current directoryCreate symlink tree in existing directoriesSymlink and folder permissionsWhat idempotent command can I use to make a symlink pointing to a directory?How to chdir to symlink source and not target in .screenrcHow to have tar follow all symlinks except one recursive symlinkHow to create a custom command or shortcut/symlink to run the standalone program?

Autumning in love

How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

Geometric mean and geometric standard deviation

Area of a 2D convex hull

What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?

If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]

Losing the Initialization Vector in Cipher Block Chaining

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

Is there folklore associating late breastfeeding with low intelligence and/or gullibility?

Estimated State payment too big --> money back; + 2018 Tax Reform

Can I throw a longsword at someone?

How to say 'striped' in Latin

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

Stars Make Stars

When is phishing education going too far?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps

I'm thinking of a number

Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?



How to create a folder symlink that has a different name?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election Results
Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” questionDynamic Symlinksunderstand the designation of symbolic linksSymlink all files in a directory with the entire directory treeSymlink aliasing files in subdirectories without changing current directoryCreate symlink tree in existing directoriesSymlink and folder permissionsWhat idempotent command can I use to make a symlink pointing to a directory?How to chdir to symlink source and not target in .screenrcHow to have tar follow all symlinks except one recursive symlinkHow to create a custom command or shortcut/symlink to run the standalone program?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I want to create a symlink



~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log


When I run



ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs


I get a symlink



~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log


which is not what I want.



I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.










share|improve this question









New contributor




ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    2















    I want to create a symlink



    ~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log


    When I run



    ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs


    I get a symlink



    ~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log


    which is not what I want.



    I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2


      1






      I want to create a symlink



      ~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log


      When I run



      ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs


      I get a symlink



      ~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log


      which is not what I want.



      I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I want to create a symlink



      ~/.pm2/logs -> /opt/myapp/log


      When I run



      ln -sFf /opt/myapp/log ~/.pm2/logs


      I get a symlink



      ~/.pm2/logs/log -> /opt/myapp/log


      which is not what I want.



      I'd prefer a POSIX-compatible solution if possible.







      symlink ln






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Kusalananda

      141k18264440




      141k18264440






      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      ptkvskptkvsk

      1112




      1112




      New contributor




      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      ptkvsk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



          Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.






          share|improve this answer























          • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

            – ptkvsk
            2 days ago







          • 1





            @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

            – Kusalananda
            2 days ago











          • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

            – 0xSheepdog
            2 days ago



















          1














          Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.






          share|improve this answer






























            1














            As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



            To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



            From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



             ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
            ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
            ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
            ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


            Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



            In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "106"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512139%2fhow-to-create-a-folder-symlink-that-has-a-different-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4














              You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



              Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.






              share|improve this answer























              • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

                – ptkvsk
                2 days ago







              • 1





                @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

                – Kusalananda
                2 days ago











              • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

                – 0xSheepdog
                2 days ago
















              4














              You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



              Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.






              share|improve this answer























              • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

                – ptkvsk
                2 days ago







              • 1





                @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

                – Kusalananda
                2 days ago











              • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

                – 0xSheepdog
                2 days ago














              4












              4








              4







              You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



              Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.






              share|improve this answer













              You already have a directory at ~/.pm2/logs. Since that directory exists, the symbolic link is put inside it.



              Would you want that ~/.pm2/logs is a symbolic link rather than a directory, then you will have to remove or rename that existing directory first.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 2 days ago









              KusalanandaKusalananda

              141k18264440




              141k18264440












              • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

                – ptkvsk
                2 days ago







              • 1





                @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

                – Kusalananda
                2 days ago











              • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

                – 0xSheepdog
                2 days ago


















              • I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

                – ptkvsk
                2 days ago







              • 1





                @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

                – Kusalananda
                2 days ago











              • Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

                – 0xSheepdog
                2 days ago

















              I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

              – ptkvsk
              2 days ago






              I thought "-Ff" flags are specifically made to replace target directory so I don't have to remove it manually. Am I wrong?

              – ptkvsk
              2 days ago





              1




              1





              @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

              – Kusalananda
              2 days ago





              @ptkvsk The -F flag does something completely different and is not a POSIX option. The -f flag would not unlink a directory. The standard specifies that if the target (the last operand) is a directory, then the link will be place inside it. The -f option does not change this behaviour.

              – Kusalananda
              2 days ago













              Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

              – 0xSheepdog
              2 days ago






              Those flags likely only work with hard links, as well. With symbolic links it doesn't matter what the Target is, a file or a directory. to hard links it does matter.

              – 0xSheepdog
              2 days ago














              1














              Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.






              share|improve this answer



























                1














                Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.






                share|improve this answer

























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Remove the ~/.pm2/logs directory first, because your target is an existing directory, the link is created inside it.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  XrXcaXrXca

                  913




                  913





















                      1














                      As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



                      To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



                      From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



                       ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
                      ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
                      ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
                      ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


                      Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



                      In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        1














                        As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



                        To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



                        From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



                         ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
                        ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
                        ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
                        ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


                        Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



                        In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



                          To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



                          From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



                           ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
                          ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
                          ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
                          ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


                          Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



                          In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.






                          share|improve this answer













                          As other answers say, there is already a directory there.



                          To avoid this and instead get an error-message, use the -T option, unfortunately I don't think this is Posix (it is GNU).



                          From the Gnu ln manual (same for cp and mv).



                           ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
                          ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form)
                          ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form)
                          ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form)


                          Note form 1 without the -T is ambiguous with form 3 (both have two arguments).



                          In Posix you can force this non-ambiguity by putting a / at the end of a directory name, in form 3, but I don't think there is any thing you can do the other way around. This is why Gnu added the -T option.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

                          12.5k52662




                          12.5k52662




















                              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              ptkvsk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512139%2fhow-to-create-a-folder-symlink-that-has-a-different-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                              Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                              Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?