Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one closed geodesic. Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldAre closed geodesics the prime numbers of Riemannian manifolds?Completeness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldExistence of closed, non self-intersecting geodesics on compact manifoldsExample for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Compact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

How to stop my camera from exagerrating differences in skin colour?

New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

I'm thinking of a number

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?

Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Strange behaviour of Check

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?

Passing functions in C++

Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?

What is the electric potential inside a point charge?

Active filter with series inductor and resistor - do these exist?

Unable to start mainnet node docker container

Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?

What loss function to use when labels are probabilities?

How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Estimate capacitor parameters



Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one closed geodesic.



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldAre closed geodesics the prime numbers of Riemannian manifolds?Completeness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldExistence of closed, non self-intersecting geodesics on compact manifoldsExample for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Compact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold










7












$begingroup$


The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    7












    $begingroup$


    The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



    Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



    If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



    And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




    1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



    2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      7












      7








      7


      1



      $begingroup$


      The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



      Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



      If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



      And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




      1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



      2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



      Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



      If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



      And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




      1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



      2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.







      differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago







      Peter Kagey

















      asked 2 days ago









      Peter KageyPeter Kagey

      1,60072053




      1,60072053




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          14












          $begingroup$

          First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



          Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



          See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



          This is known for surfaces (with the only hard case when the surface is diffeomorphic to $S^2$ in which case the result is due to Bangert and Franks) and for many higher-dimensional manifolds. However, the problem is open already when $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            7












            $begingroup$

            If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



            EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kagey
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
              $endgroup$
              – Ted Shifrin
              2 days ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              It's a nice example; you should leave it.
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kagey
              2 days ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-closed-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            14












            $begingroup$

            First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



            Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



            See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



            This is known for surfaces (with the only hard case when the surface is diffeomorphic to $S^2$ in which case the result is due to Bangert and Franks) and for many higher-dimensional manifolds. However, the problem is open already when $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              14












              $begingroup$

              First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



              Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



              See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



              This is known for surfaces (with the only hard case when the surface is diffeomorphic to $S^2$ in which case the result is due to Bangert and Franks) and for many higher-dimensional manifolds. However, the problem is open already when $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                14












                14








                14





                $begingroup$

                First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



                Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



                See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



                This is known for surfaces (with the only hard case when the surface is diffeomorphic to $S^2$ in which case the result is due to Bangert and Franks) and for many higher-dimensional manifolds. However, the problem is open already when $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



                Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



                See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



                This is known for surfaces (with the only hard case when the surface is diffeomorphic to $S^2$ in which case the result is due to Bangert and Franks) and for many higher-dimensional manifolds. However, the problem is open already when $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited yesterday

























                answered 2 days ago









                Moishe KohanMoishe Kohan

                48.8k344111




                48.8k344111





















                    7












                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      2 days ago






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      2 days ago















                    7












                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      2 days ago






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      2 days ago













                    7












                    7








                    7





                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 2 days ago

























                    answered 2 days ago









                    Ted ShifrinTed Shifrin

                    65.1k44792




                    65.1k44792











                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      2 days ago






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      2 days ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      2 days ago






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      2 days ago















                    $begingroup$
                    Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    2 days ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    2 days ago












                    $begingroup$
                    Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ted Shifrin
                    2 days ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ted Shifrin
                    2 days ago




                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    2 days ago




                    $begingroup$
                    It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    2 days ago

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-closed-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                    Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                    Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?