A nasty indefinite integral $ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) … (x+m) dx $Indefinite integral of normal distributionAnother messy integral: $I=int fracsqrt2-x-x^2x^2 dx$Alternative way to do this indefinite integral?Integral $int sqrtfracx2-xdx$$intlimits_0^10e^-0.04tcdot e^-0.001t^2dt$Other ways to calculate this indefinite integral ($int frac2dx(cos(x) - sin(x))^2$)?Find the indefinite integral $intfracdx(x^2+2x+5)^2$Compute the following integral: $int _ln3^ln 6:8e^xdx$Evaulating the trigonometric integral $int frac1(x^2+1)^2 , dx$Indefinite integral of $frac1(x+1)^2$
How to patch glass cuts in a bicycle tire?
In general, would I need to season a meat when making a sauce?
Is it possible to play as a necromancer skeleton?
Count rotary dial pulses in a phone number (including letters)
Make 24 using exactly three 3s
What to keep in mind when telling an aunt how wrong her actions are, without creating further family conflict?
Python program to take in two strings and print the larger string
Need to understand my home electrical meter to see why bill is so high and/or if neighbor is on same meter
Can a person survive on blood in place of water?
using Leibniz rule to solve definite integral
How to use libraries with delays inside within a time critical STM32 HAL application?
Gladys goes shopping
Installed Tankless Water Heater - Internet loss when active
Did people Unsnap to where they were?
Count Even Digits In Number
Why are C64 games inconsistent with which joystick port they use?
Who will lead the country until there is a new Tory leader?
Why did David Cameron offer a referendum on the European Union?
Why is a `for` loop so much faster to count True values?
Why does Mjolnir fall down in Age of Ultron but not in Endgame?
Where have Brexit voters gone?
Sitecore 9.0 works with solr 7.2.1?
Where is the logic in castrating fighters?
How to deal with a colleague who is being aggressive?
A nasty indefinite integral $ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) … (x+m) dx $
Indefinite integral of normal distributionAnother messy integral: $I=int fracsqrt2-x-x^2x^2 dx$Alternative way to do this indefinite integral?Integral $int sqrtfracx2-xdx$$intlimits_0^10e^-0.04tcdot e^-0.001t^2dt$Other ways to calculate this indefinite integral ($int frac2dx(cos(x) - sin(x))^2$)?Find the indefinite integral $intfracdx(x^2+2x+5)^2$Compute the following integral: $int _ln3^ln 6:8e^xdx$Evaulating the trigonometric integral $int frac1(x^2+1)^2 , dx$Indefinite integral of $frac1(x+1)^2$
$begingroup$
Below is a problem from the book "Calculus and Analytic Geometry" by Thomas Finney. I am hoping somebody can check my work. I consider it to be a particular hard problem.
Thanks,
Bob
Problem:
We dare you to evalaute this integral.
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ... (x+m) ,, dx $$
Answer:
To evaluate this integral, we will consider some special cases. For $m = 0$ we have:
beginalign*
int frac1x ,, dx &= ln|x| + C \
endalign*
Now for $m = 1$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 \
1 &= A(x+1) + B(x) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)$ which yields $A = 1$.
beginalign*
A + B &= 0 \
1 + B &= 0 \
B &= -1 \
frac1x(x+1) &= frac1x - frac1x+1 \
int frac1x(x+1) ,, dx &= ln|x| - ln|x+1| + C \
endalign*
Now for $m = 2$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2) + B(x)(x+2) + C(x)(x+1) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)$ which yields $A = frac12$.
newline
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2) = -B$ which yields $B = -1$.
newline
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1) = 2C$ which yields $C = frac12$.
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2) &= frac frac12x - frac1x+1 + frac frac12x+2 \
int frac1x(x+1)(x+2) ,, dx &= frac12 ln - ln + frac12 ln + C \
endalign*
newline
Now for $m = 3$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 + fracDx+3 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) + B(x)(x+2)(x+3) + \
& C(x)(x+1)(x+3) + D(x)(x+1)(x+2) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)(0+3) = 6A$ which yields $A = frac16$.
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2)(-1+3) = -2B$ which yields $B = -frac12$.
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3) = 2C$ which yields $C = frac12$.
At $x = -3$ we have $1 = D(-3)(-3+1)(-3+2) = -6D$ which yields $D = -frac16$.
Hence, we have the following solution:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) ,, dx =
frac16ln - frac12ln + frac12ln - frac16ln + C $$
newline
Now for $m = 4$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 + fracDx+3 + fracEx+4 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) + B(x)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) + \
&+ C(x)(x+1)(x+3)(x+4) \
&+ D(x)(x+1)(x+2)(x+4) + E(x)(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)(0+3)(0+4) = 24A$ which yields $A = frac124$.
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2)(-1+3)(-1+4) = -6B$ which yields $B = -frac16$.
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3)(-2+4) = 4C$ which yields $C = frac14$.
At $x = -3$ we have $1 = D(-3)(-3+1)(-3+2)(-3+4) = -6D$ which yields $D = -frac16$.
At $x = -4$ we have $1 = E(-4)(-4+1)(-4+2)(-4+3) = 24E$ which yields $E = frac124$.
Hence we have the solution:
Now for $m = 4$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ,, dx =
fracln - 4ln + 6ln - 4ln + ln 24 + C $$
Now let's consider the general case.
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) cdots (x+m) ,, &= fracC_0x + fracC_1x+1 cdots + fracC_mx+m \
endalign*
beginalign*
1 &= C_0(x+1)(x+2) cdots (x+m) + C_1(x)(x+2) cdots (x+m) + C_2(x)(x+1)(x+3)(x+4) cdots (x+m) + \
& cdots C_m(x)(x+1)(x+2) cdots (x+m-1) \
endalign*
Now lets consider the first term. We set $x = 0$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m! C_0 \
C_0 &= frac1m!
endalign*
Now lets consider the $C_2$ term. We set $x = 2$ and $m > 4$. We get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_2(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3)(-2+4)(-2 + 5) cdots (-2 + m) \
1 &= C_2 (2)(1)(2)(3)(4) cdots (m-2) \
1 &= 2(m-2)! C_2 \
C_2 &= frac12(m-2)! = fracm(m-1)2(m!) \
C_2 &= frac binom m2 m! \
endalign*
Now lets consider the last term. We set $x = -m$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (x+m -1) \
C_m &= frac(-1)^mm! \
endalign*
Now lets consider one of the middle terms. We set $x = -k$ where $0 <= k <= m$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= -1^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*
Hence the answer is:
$$ sum_k=0^k=m left( frac binom mk (-1)^k m! right)
lnx+k + C $$
calculus integration proof-verification
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Below is a problem from the book "Calculus and Analytic Geometry" by Thomas Finney. I am hoping somebody can check my work. I consider it to be a particular hard problem.
Thanks,
Bob
Problem:
We dare you to evalaute this integral.
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ... (x+m) ,, dx $$
Answer:
To evaluate this integral, we will consider some special cases. For $m = 0$ we have:
beginalign*
int frac1x ,, dx &= ln|x| + C \
endalign*
Now for $m = 1$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 \
1 &= A(x+1) + B(x) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)$ which yields $A = 1$.
beginalign*
A + B &= 0 \
1 + B &= 0 \
B &= -1 \
frac1x(x+1) &= frac1x - frac1x+1 \
int frac1x(x+1) ,, dx &= ln|x| - ln|x+1| + C \
endalign*
Now for $m = 2$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2) + B(x)(x+2) + C(x)(x+1) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)$ which yields $A = frac12$.
newline
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2) = -B$ which yields $B = -1$.
newline
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1) = 2C$ which yields $C = frac12$.
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2) &= frac frac12x - frac1x+1 + frac frac12x+2 \
int frac1x(x+1)(x+2) ,, dx &= frac12 ln - ln + frac12 ln + C \
endalign*
newline
Now for $m = 3$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 + fracDx+3 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) + B(x)(x+2)(x+3) + \
& C(x)(x+1)(x+3) + D(x)(x+1)(x+2) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)(0+3) = 6A$ which yields $A = frac16$.
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2)(-1+3) = -2B$ which yields $B = -frac12$.
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3) = 2C$ which yields $C = frac12$.
At $x = -3$ we have $1 = D(-3)(-3+1)(-3+2) = -6D$ which yields $D = -frac16$.
Hence, we have the following solution:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) ,, dx =
frac16ln - frac12ln + frac12ln - frac16ln + C $$
newline
Now for $m = 4$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 + fracDx+3 + fracEx+4 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) + B(x)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) + \
&+ C(x)(x+1)(x+3)(x+4) \
&+ D(x)(x+1)(x+2)(x+4) + E(x)(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)(0+3)(0+4) = 24A$ which yields $A = frac124$.
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2)(-1+3)(-1+4) = -6B$ which yields $B = -frac16$.
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3)(-2+4) = 4C$ which yields $C = frac14$.
At $x = -3$ we have $1 = D(-3)(-3+1)(-3+2)(-3+4) = -6D$ which yields $D = -frac16$.
At $x = -4$ we have $1 = E(-4)(-4+1)(-4+2)(-4+3) = 24E$ which yields $E = frac124$.
Hence we have the solution:
Now for $m = 4$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ,, dx =
fracln - 4ln + 6ln - 4ln + ln 24 + C $$
Now let's consider the general case.
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) cdots (x+m) ,, &= fracC_0x + fracC_1x+1 cdots + fracC_mx+m \
endalign*
beginalign*
1 &= C_0(x+1)(x+2) cdots (x+m) + C_1(x)(x+2) cdots (x+m) + C_2(x)(x+1)(x+3)(x+4) cdots (x+m) + \
& cdots C_m(x)(x+1)(x+2) cdots (x+m-1) \
endalign*
Now lets consider the first term. We set $x = 0$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m! C_0 \
C_0 &= frac1m!
endalign*
Now lets consider the $C_2$ term. We set $x = 2$ and $m > 4$. We get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_2(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3)(-2+4)(-2 + 5) cdots (-2 + m) \
1 &= C_2 (2)(1)(2)(3)(4) cdots (m-2) \
1 &= 2(m-2)! C_2 \
C_2 &= frac12(m-2)! = fracm(m-1)2(m!) \
C_2 &= frac binom m2 m! \
endalign*
Now lets consider the last term. We set $x = -m$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (x+m -1) \
C_m &= frac(-1)^mm! \
endalign*
Now lets consider one of the middle terms. We set $x = -k$ where $0 <= k <= m$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= -1^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*
Hence the answer is:
$$ sum_k=0^k=m left( frac binom mk (-1)^k m! right)
lnx+k + C $$
calculus integration proof-verification
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What's your question?
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:05
2
$begingroup$
@user376343 - From the opening of the post, "I am hoping somebody can check my work."
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 19 at 19:07
3
$begingroup$
It seems it is right, but the powers of $-1$ must be in parentheses. ... and it is usual to put them in numerators rather than in denominators.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:12
3
$begingroup$
There are no mistakes in your work per se. However, you should try to make solutions to problems as concise as possible without sacrificing clarity. If I were teaching a class how to do this problem, I would probably show all the work you showed in your answer. If I were doing this problem for homework, I would set up a standard induction argument. Base cases ($m = 0$, $m = 1$): $ldots$. Inductive step: $ldots$. Your prof probably doesn't want to see your thought process; he just wants to see a clear and complete solution.
$endgroup$
– Charles Hudgins
May 19 at 19:57
2
$begingroup$
@Bob the powers of $−1$ must be in parentheses, otherwise it is always $-1$.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 20:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Below is a problem from the book "Calculus and Analytic Geometry" by Thomas Finney. I am hoping somebody can check my work. I consider it to be a particular hard problem.
Thanks,
Bob
Problem:
We dare you to evalaute this integral.
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ... (x+m) ,, dx $$
Answer:
To evaluate this integral, we will consider some special cases. For $m = 0$ we have:
beginalign*
int frac1x ,, dx &= ln|x| + C \
endalign*
Now for $m = 1$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 \
1 &= A(x+1) + B(x) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)$ which yields $A = 1$.
beginalign*
A + B &= 0 \
1 + B &= 0 \
B &= -1 \
frac1x(x+1) &= frac1x - frac1x+1 \
int frac1x(x+1) ,, dx &= ln|x| - ln|x+1| + C \
endalign*
Now for $m = 2$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2) + B(x)(x+2) + C(x)(x+1) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)$ which yields $A = frac12$.
newline
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2) = -B$ which yields $B = -1$.
newline
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1) = 2C$ which yields $C = frac12$.
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2) &= frac frac12x - frac1x+1 + frac frac12x+2 \
int frac1x(x+1)(x+2) ,, dx &= frac12 ln - ln + frac12 ln + C \
endalign*
newline
Now for $m = 3$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 + fracDx+3 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) + B(x)(x+2)(x+3) + \
& C(x)(x+1)(x+3) + D(x)(x+1)(x+2) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)(0+3) = 6A$ which yields $A = frac16$.
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2)(-1+3) = -2B$ which yields $B = -frac12$.
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3) = 2C$ which yields $C = frac12$.
At $x = -3$ we have $1 = D(-3)(-3+1)(-3+2) = -6D$ which yields $D = -frac16$.
Hence, we have the following solution:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) ,, dx =
frac16ln - frac12ln + frac12ln - frac16ln + C $$
newline
Now for $m = 4$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 + fracDx+3 + fracEx+4 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) + B(x)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) + \
&+ C(x)(x+1)(x+3)(x+4) \
&+ D(x)(x+1)(x+2)(x+4) + E(x)(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)(0+3)(0+4) = 24A$ which yields $A = frac124$.
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2)(-1+3)(-1+4) = -6B$ which yields $B = -frac16$.
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3)(-2+4) = 4C$ which yields $C = frac14$.
At $x = -3$ we have $1 = D(-3)(-3+1)(-3+2)(-3+4) = -6D$ which yields $D = -frac16$.
At $x = -4$ we have $1 = E(-4)(-4+1)(-4+2)(-4+3) = 24E$ which yields $E = frac124$.
Hence we have the solution:
Now for $m = 4$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ,, dx =
fracln - 4ln + 6ln - 4ln + ln 24 + C $$
Now let's consider the general case.
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) cdots (x+m) ,, &= fracC_0x + fracC_1x+1 cdots + fracC_mx+m \
endalign*
beginalign*
1 &= C_0(x+1)(x+2) cdots (x+m) + C_1(x)(x+2) cdots (x+m) + C_2(x)(x+1)(x+3)(x+4) cdots (x+m) + \
& cdots C_m(x)(x+1)(x+2) cdots (x+m-1) \
endalign*
Now lets consider the first term. We set $x = 0$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m! C_0 \
C_0 &= frac1m!
endalign*
Now lets consider the $C_2$ term. We set $x = 2$ and $m > 4$. We get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_2(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3)(-2+4)(-2 + 5) cdots (-2 + m) \
1 &= C_2 (2)(1)(2)(3)(4) cdots (m-2) \
1 &= 2(m-2)! C_2 \
C_2 &= frac12(m-2)! = fracm(m-1)2(m!) \
C_2 &= frac binom m2 m! \
endalign*
Now lets consider the last term. We set $x = -m$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (x+m -1) \
C_m &= frac(-1)^mm! \
endalign*
Now lets consider one of the middle terms. We set $x = -k$ where $0 <= k <= m$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= -1^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*
Hence the answer is:
$$ sum_k=0^k=m left( frac binom mk (-1)^k m! right)
lnx+k + C $$
calculus integration proof-verification
$endgroup$
Below is a problem from the book "Calculus and Analytic Geometry" by Thomas Finney. I am hoping somebody can check my work. I consider it to be a particular hard problem.
Thanks,
Bob
Problem:
We dare you to evalaute this integral.
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ... (x+m) ,, dx $$
Answer:
To evaluate this integral, we will consider some special cases. For $m = 0$ we have:
beginalign*
int frac1x ,, dx &= ln|x| + C \
endalign*
Now for $m = 1$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 \
1 &= A(x+1) + B(x) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)$ which yields $A = 1$.
beginalign*
A + B &= 0 \
1 + B &= 0 \
B &= -1 \
frac1x(x+1) &= frac1x - frac1x+1 \
int frac1x(x+1) ,, dx &= ln|x| - ln|x+1| + C \
endalign*
Now for $m = 2$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2) + B(x)(x+2) + C(x)(x+1) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)$ which yields $A = frac12$.
newline
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2) = -B$ which yields $B = -1$.
newline
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1) = 2C$ which yields $C = frac12$.
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2) &= frac frac12x - frac1x+1 + frac frac12x+2 \
int frac1x(x+1)(x+2) ,, dx &= frac12 ln - ln + frac12 ln + C \
endalign*
newline
Now for $m = 3$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 + fracDx+3 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) + B(x)(x+2)(x+3) + \
& C(x)(x+1)(x+3) + D(x)(x+1)(x+2) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)(0+3) = 6A$ which yields $A = frac16$.
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2)(-1+3) = -2B$ which yields $B = -frac12$.
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3) = 2C$ which yields $C = frac12$.
At $x = -3$ we have $1 = D(-3)(-3+1)(-3+2) = -6D$ which yields $D = -frac16$.
Hence, we have the following solution:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) ,, dx =
frac16ln - frac12ln + frac12ln - frac16ln + C $$
newline
Now for $m = 4$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ,, dx $$
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) &= fracAx + fracBx+1 + fracCx+2 + fracDx+3 + fracEx+4 \
1 &= A(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) + B(x)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) + \
&+ C(x)(x+1)(x+3)(x+4) \
&+ D(x)(x+1)(x+2)(x+4) + E(x)(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) \
endalign*
At $x = 0$ we have $1 = A(0+1)(0+2)(0+3)(0+4) = 24A$ which yields $A = frac124$.
At $x = -1$ we have $1 = B(-1)(-1+2)(-1+3)(-1+4) = -6B$ which yields $B = -frac16$.
At $x = -2$ we have $1 = C(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3)(-2+4) = 4C$ which yields $C = frac14$.
At $x = -3$ we have $1 = D(-3)(-3+1)(-3+2)(-3+4) = -6D$ which yields $D = -frac16$.
At $x = -4$ we have $1 = E(-4)(-4+1)(-4+2)(-4+3) = 24E$ which yields $E = frac124$.
Hence we have the solution:
Now for $m = 4$ we have the following integral:
$$ int frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) ,, dx =
fracln - 4ln + 6ln - 4ln + ln 24 + C $$
Now let's consider the general case.
beginalign*
frac1x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) cdots (x+m) ,, &= fracC_0x + fracC_1x+1 cdots + fracC_mx+m \
endalign*
beginalign*
1 &= C_0(x+1)(x+2) cdots (x+m) + C_1(x)(x+2) cdots (x+m) + C_2(x)(x+1)(x+3)(x+4) cdots (x+m) + \
& cdots C_m(x)(x+1)(x+2) cdots (x+m-1) \
endalign*
Now lets consider the first term. We set $x = 0$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m! C_0 \
C_0 &= frac1m!
endalign*
Now lets consider the $C_2$ term. We set $x = 2$ and $m > 4$. We get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_2(-2)(-2+1)(-2+3)(-2+4)(-2 + 5) cdots (-2 + m) \
1 &= C_2 (2)(1)(2)(3)(4) cdots (m-2) \
1 &= 2(m-2)! C_2 \
C_2 &= frac12(m-2)! = fracm(m-1)2(m!) \
C_2 &= frac binom m2 m! \
endalign*
Now lets consider the last term. We set $x = -m$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (x+m -1) \
C_m &= frac(-1)^mm! \
endalign*
Now lets consider one of the middle terms. We set $x = -k$ where $0 <= k <= m$ and we get:
beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= -1^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*
Hence the answer is:
$$ sum_k=0^k=m left( frac binom mk (-1)^k m! right)
lnx+k + C $$
calculus integration proof-verification
calculus integration proof-verification
edited May 20 at 6:52
YuiTo Cheng
3,26371345
3,26371345
asked May 19 at 19:02
BobBob
1,024516
1,024516
$begingroup$
What's your question?
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:05
2
$begingroup$
@user376343 - From the opening of the post, "I am hoping somebody can check my work."
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 19 at 19:07
3
$begingroup$
It seems it is right, but the powers of $-1$ must be in parentheses. ... and it is usual to put them in numerators rather than in denominators.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:12
3
$begingroup$
There are no mistakes in your work per se. However, you should try to make solutions to problems as concise as possible without sacrificing clarity. If I were teaching a class how to do this problem, I would probably show all the work you showed in your answer. If I were doing this problem for homework, I would set up a standard induction argument. Base cases ($m = 0$, $m = 1$): $ldots$. Inductive step: $ldots$. Your prof probably doesn't want to see your thought process; he just wants to see a clear and complete solution.
$endgroup$
– Charles Hudgins
May 19 at 19:57
2
$begingroup$
@Bob the powers of $−1$ must be in parentheses, otherwise it is always $-1$.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 20:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
What's your question?
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:05
2
$begingroup$
@user376343 - From the opening of the post, "I am hoping somebody can check my work."
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 19 at 19:07
3
$begingroup$
It seems it is right, but the powers of $-1$ must be in parentheses. ... and it is usual to put them in numerators rather than in denominators.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:12
3
$begingroup$
There are no mistakes in your work per se. However, you should try to make solutions to problems as concise as possible without sacrificing clarity. If I were teaching a class how to do this problem, I would probably show all the work you showed in your answer. If I were doing this problem for homework, I would set up a standard induction argument. Base cases ($m = 0$, $m = 1$): $ldots$. Inductive step: $ldots$. Your prof probably doesn't want to see your thought process; he just wants to see a clear and complete solution.
$endgroup$
– Charles Hudgins
May 19 at 19:57
2
$begingroup$
@Bob the powers of $−1$ must be in parentheses, otherwise it is always $-1$.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 20:20
$begingroup$
What's your question?
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:05
$begingroup$
What's your question?
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:05
2
2
$begingroup$
@user376343 - From the opening of the post, "I am hoping somebody can check my work."
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 19 at 19:07
$begingroup$
@user376343 - From the opening of the post, "I am hoping somebody can check my work."
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 19 at 19:07
3
3
$begingroup$
It seems it is right, but the powers of $-1$ must be in parentheses. ... and it is usual to put them in numerators rather than in denominators.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:12
$begingroup$
It seems it is right, but the powers of $-1$ must be in parentheses. ... and it is usual to put them in numerators rather than in denominators.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:12
3
3
$begingroup$
There are no mistakes in your work per se. However, you should try to make solutions to problems as concise as possible without sacrificing clarity. If I were teaching a class how to do this problem, I would probably show all the work you showed in your answer. If I were doing this problem for homework, I would set up a standard induction argument. Base cases ($m = 0$, $m = 1$): $ldots$. Inductive step: $ldots$. Your prof probably doesn't want to see your thought process; he just wants to see a clear and complete solution.
$endgroup$
– Charles Hudgins
May 19 at 19:57
$begingroup$
There are no mistakes in your work per se. However, you should try to make solutions to problems as concise as possible without sacrificing clarity. If I were teaching a class how to do this problem, I would probably show all the work you showed in your answer. If I were doing this problem for homework, I would set up a standard induction argument. Base cases ($m = 0$, $m = 1$): $ldots$. Inductive step: $ldots$. Your prof probably doesn't want to see your thought process; he just wants to see a clear and complete solution.
$endgroup$
– Charles Hudgins
May 19 at 19:57
2
2
$begingroup$
@Bob the powers of $−1$ must be in parentheses, otherwise it is always $-1$.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 20:20
$begingroup$
@Bob the powers of $−1$ must be in parentheses, otherwise it is always $-1$.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 20:20
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
At this line: "Now lets consider the first term. We set $x=0$ and we get:"
$$1 = C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m!C_0$$
When you set $x=0$ there won't be any $x$ left.
For $C_2$ there is no mistake but then for the general term you did the same typo.
You can't have after you set $x=-m$: $$1 = C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (colorredx+m -1)$$
And for the last part for some reason, you have $C_k$ in the denominator.
$$beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*$$
Other than this everything it's correct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpick. It's more appropriate to have $(-1)^k$ instead of $-1^k$. It makes it clearer that it's $-1$ being raised to the power. Otherwise per the order of operations, for example, $$-2^6 = -(2^6) = -64 ne (-2)^6 = 64$$
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 20 at 2:07
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer Actually it was a LaTeX typo:-1^kinstead of(-1)^k.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
May 20 at 7:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simpler approach is possible without all the other preliminary work. Let $$q_m(x) = prod_k=0^m (x+k), quad f_m(x) = frac1q_m(x).$$ Then $f$ admits a partial fraction decomposition of the form $$f_m(x) = sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n tag1$$ for suitable constants $A_0, ldots, A_m$ which we wish to find, hence an antiderivative of $f$ is $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m A_n log |x+n|. tag2$$ (I have omitted the constant of integration for convenience.) So all that remains is to determine the form of $A_n$. To do this, we observe that $$1 = q_m(x) sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n = sum_n=0^m p_n(x) A_n,$$ where $$p_n(x) = prod_k ne n (x+k) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (-x-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k + x).$$ Then in particular $$p_n(-n) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (n-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k-n) = (-1)^n n!(m-n)! = frac(-1)^n m!binommn,$$ and $p_n(-k) = 0$ for all other nonnegative integers $k le m$ not equal to $n$. Therefore, $$A_n = frac1p_n(-n) = frac(-1)^nm! binommn$$ and $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m frac(-1)^nm! binommn log |x+n| + C$$ as claimed.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It looks right to me [That is, I did the calculation independently and got the same answer]. For brevity/clarity purposes you really only need to include the “general case”.
It would be more conventional to write
$$
C_k = frac(-1)^kk!(m-k)!
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We could set up a difference equation. Partial fractions indicates that
$$f_m(x)=frac1prod_k=0^m(x+k)=sum_k=0^mfracA_k^(m)x+m$$
And it is a simple calculation to show that
$$f_m-1(x)-f_m-1(x+1)=mf_m(x)$$
So, comparing coefficients of $frac1x+k$ we have $A_0^(m-1)=mA_0^(m)$, $A_m-1^(m-1)=-mA_m^(m)$, and $A_k^(m-1)-A_k-1^(m-1)=mA_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. If we let $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!B_k^(m)$ then our difference equations read $B_0^(m-1)=B_0^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=A_0^(0)=1$, $B_m-1^(m-1)=B_m^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=1$ and $B_k^(m-1)+B_k-1^(m-1)=B_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. We recognize these as the difference equations for Pascal's triangle, so $B_k^(m)=mchoose k$ so it follows that $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!mchoose k$ and
$$int f_m(x)dx=sum_k=0^mfrac(-1)^km!mchoose kln|x+k|+C$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3232158%2fa-nasty-indefinite-integral-int-frac1xx1x2x3x4-xm-dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
At this line: "Now lets consider the first term. We set $x=0$ and we get:"
$$1 = C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m!C_0$$
When you set $x=0$ there won't be any $x$ left.
For $C_2$ there is no mistake but then for the general term you did the same typo.
You can't have after you set $x=-m$: $$1 = C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (colorredx+m -1)$$
And for the last part for some reason, you have $C_k$ in the denominator.
$$beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*$$
Other than this everything it's correct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpick. It's more appropriate to have $(-1)^k$ instead of $-1^k$. It makes it clearer that it's $-1$ being raised to the power. Otherwise per the order of operations, for example, $$-2^6 = -(2^6) = -64 ne (-2)^6 = 64$$
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 20 at 2:07
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer Actually it was a LaTeX typo:-1^kinstead of(-1)^k.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
May 20 at 7:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At this line: "Now lets consider the first term. We set $x=0$ and we get:"
$$1 = C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m!C_0$$
When you set $x=0$ there won't be any $x$ left.
For $C_2$ there is no mistake but then for the general term you did the same typo.
You can't have after you set $x=-m$: $$1 = C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (colorredx+m -1)$$
And for the last part for some reason, you have $C_k$ in the denominator.
$$beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*$$
Other than this everything it's correct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpick. It's more appropriate to have $(-1)^k$ instead of $-1^k$. It makes it clearer that it's $-1$ being raised to the power. Otherwise per the order of operations, for example, $$-2^6 = -(2^6) = -64 ne (-2)^6 = 64$$
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 20 at 2:07
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer Actually it was a LaTeX typo:-1^kinstead of(-1)^k.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
May 20 at 7:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At this line: "Now lets consider the first term. We set $x=0$ and we get:"
$$1 = C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m!C_0$$
When you set $x=0$ there won't be any $x$ left.
For $C_2$ there is no mistake but then for the general term you did the same typo.
You can't have after you set $x=-m$: $$1 = C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (colorredx+m -1)$$
And for the last part for some reason, you have $C_k$ in the denominator.
$$beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*$$
Other than this everything it's correct.
$endgroup$
At this line: "Now lets consider the first term. We set $x=0$ and we get:"
$$1 = C_0(0+1)(0+2) cdots (x+m) = m!C_0$$
When you set $x=0$ there won't be any $x$ left.
For $C_2$ there is no mistake but then for the general term you did the same typo.
You can't have after you set $x=-m$: $$1 = C_m(-m)(-m+1)(-m+2) cdots (colorredx+m -1)$$
And for the last part for some reason, you have $C_k$ in the denominator.
$$beginalign*
1 &= C_k(-k)(-k+1)(-k+2) cdots (-1) (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
1 &= (-1)^k C_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac 1 (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)(2) cdots (-k + m - 1) \
C_k &= frac k! (-1)^k colorredC_k(k-1)(k-2) cdots (1)m! \
C_k &= frac binom mk (-1)^k m! \
endalign*$$
Other than this everything it's correct.
edited May 20 at 7:12
Jean-Claude Arbaut
16k63865
16k63865
answered May 19 at 19:40
Three sided coinThree sided coin
70512
70512
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpick. It's more appropriate to have $(-1)^k$ instead of $-1^k$. It makes it clearer that it's $-1$ being raised to the power. Otherwise per the order of operations, for example, $$-2^6 = -(2^6) = -64 ne (-2)^6 = 64$$
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 20 at 2:07
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer Actually it was a LaTeX typo:-1^kinstead of(-1)^k.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
May 20 at 7:13
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpick. It's more appropriate to have $(-1)^k$ instead of $-1^k$. It makes it clearer that it's $-1$ being raised to the power. Otherwise per the order of operations, for example, $$-2^6 = -(2^6) = -64 ne (-2)^6 = 64$$
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 20 at 2:07
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer Actually it was a LaTeX typo:-1^kinstead of(-1)^k.
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
May 20 at 7:13
1
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpick. It's more appropriate to have $(-1)^k$ instead of $-1^k$. It makes it clearer that it's $-1$ being raised to the power. Otherwise per the order of operations, for example, $$-2^6 = -(2^6) = -64 ne (-2)^6 = 64$$
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 20 at 2:07
$begingroup$
Minor nitpick. It's more appropriate to have $(-1)^k$ instead of $-1^k$. It makes it clearer that it's $-1$ being raised to the power. Otherwise per the order of operations, for example, $$-2^6 = -(2^6) = -64 ne (-2)^6 = 64$$
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 20 at 2:07
1
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer Actually it was a LaTeX typo:
-1^k instead of (-1)^k.$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
May 20 at 7:13
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer Actually it was a LaTeX typo:
-1^k instead of (-1)^k.$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
May 20 at 7:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simpler approach is possible without all the other preliminary work. Let $$q_m(x) = prod_k=0^m (x+k), quad f_m(x) = frac1q_m(x).$$ Then $f$ admits a partial fraction decomposition of the form $$f_m(x) = sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n tag1$$ for suitable constants $A_0, ldots, A_m$ which we wish to find, hence an antiderivative of $f$ is $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m A_n log |x+n|. tag2$$ (I have omitted the constant of integration for convenience.) So all that remains is to determine the form of $A_n$. To do this, we observe that $$1 = q_m(x) sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n = sum_n=0^m p_n(x) A_n,$$ where $$p_n(x) = prod_k ne n (x+k) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (-x-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k + x).$$ Then in particular $$p_n(-n) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (n-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k-n) = (-1)^n n!(m-n)! = frac(-1)^n m!binommn,$$ and $p_n(-k) = 0$ for all other nonnegative integers $k le m$ not equal to $n$. Therefore, $$A_n = frac1p_n(-n) = frac(-1)^nm! binommn$$ and $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m frac(-1)^nm! binommn log |x+n| + C$$ as claimed.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simpler approach is possible without all the other preliminary work. Let $$q_m(x) = prod_k=0^m (x+k), quad f_m(x) = frac1q_m(x).$$ Then $f$ admits a partial fraction decomposition of the form $$f_m(x) = sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n tag1$$ for suitable constants $A_0, ldots, A_m$ which we wish to find, hence an antiderivative of $f$ is $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m A_n log |x+n|. tag2$$ (I have omitted the constant of integration for convenience.) So all that remains is to determine the form of $A_n$. To do this, we observe that $$1 = q_m(x) sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n = sum_n=0^m p_n(x) A_n,$$ where $$p_n(x) = prod_k ne n (x+k) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (-x-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k + x).$$ Then in particular $$p_n(-n) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (n-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k-n) = (-1)^n n!(m-n)! = frac(-1)^n m!binommn,$$ and $p_n(-k) = 0$ for all other nonnegative integers $k le m$ not equal to $n$. Therefore, $$A_n = frac1p_n(-n) = frac(-1)^nm! binommn$$ and $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m frac(-1)^nm! binommn log |x+n| + C$$ as claimed.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simpler approach is possible without all the other preliminary work. Let $$q_m(x) = prod_k=0^m (x+k), quad f_m(x) = frac1q_m(x).$$ Then $f$ admits a partial fraction decomposition of the form $$f_m(x) = sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n tag1$$ for suitable constants $A_0, ldots, A_m$ which we wish to find, hence an antiderivative of $f$ is $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m A_n log |x+n|. tag2$$ (I have omitted the constant of integration for convenience.) So all that remains is to determine the form of $A_n$. To do this, we observe that $$1 = q_m(x) sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n = sum_n=0^m p_n(x) A_n,$$ where $$p_n(x) = prod_k ne n (x+k) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (-x-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k + x).$$ Then in particular $$p_n(-n) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (n-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k-n) = (-1)^n n!(m-n)! = frac(-1)^n m!binommn,$$ and $p_n(-k) = 0$ for all other nonnegative integers $k le m$ not equal to $n$. Therefore, $$A_n = frac1p_n(-n) = frac(-1)^nm! binommn$$ and $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m frac(-1)^nm! binommn log |x+n| + C$$ as claimed.
$endgroup$
A simpler approach is possible without all the other preliminary work. Let $$q_m(x) = prod_k=0^m (x+k), quad f_m(x) = frac1q_m(x).$$ Then $f$ admits a partial fraction decomposition of the form $$f_m(x) = sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n tag1$$ for suitable constants $A_0, ldots, A_m$ which we wish to find, hence an antiderivative of $f$ is $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m A_n log |x+n|. tag2$$ (I have omitted the constant of integration for convenience.) So all that remains is to determine the form of $A_n$. To do this, we observe that $$1 = q_m(x) sum_n=0^m fracA_nx+n = sum_n=0^m p_n(x) A_n,$$ where $$p_n(x) = prod_k ne n (x+k) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (-x-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k + x).$$ Then in particular $$p_n(-n) = (-1)^n prod_k=0^n-1 (n-k) prod_k=n+1^m (k-n) = (-1)^n n!(m-n)! = frac(-1)^n m!binommn,$$ and $p_n(-k) = 0$ for all other nonnegative integers $k le m$ not equal to $n$. Therefore, $$A_n = frac1p_n(-n) = frac(-1)^nm! binommn$$ and $$int f_m(x) , dx = sum_n=0^m frac(-1)^nm! binommn log |x+n| + C$$ as claimed.
answered May 19 at 21:18
heropupheropup
66.9k866105
66.9k866105
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It looks right to me [That is, I did the calculation independently and got the same answer]. For brevity/clarity purposes you really only need to include the “general case”.
It would be more conventional to write
$$
C_k = frac(-1)^kk!(m-k)!
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It looks right to me [That is, I did the calculation independently and got the same answer]. For brevity/clarity purposes you really only need to include the “general case”.
It would be more conventional to write
$$
C_k = frac(-1)^kk!(m-k)!
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It looks right to me [That is, I did the calculation independently and got the same answer]. For brevity/clarity purposes you really only need to include the “general case”.
It would be more conventional to write
$$
C_k = frac(-1)^kk!(m-k)!
$$
$endgroup$
It looks right to me [That is, I did the calculation independently and got the same answer]. For brevity/clarity purposes you really only need to include the “general case”.
It would be more conventional to write
$$
C_k = frac(-1)^kk!(m-k)!
$$
edited May 19 at 19:21
answered May 19 at 19:15
Matthew LeingangMatthew Leingang
17.4k12346
17.4k12346
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We could set up a difference equation. Partial fractions indicates that
$$f_m(x)=frac1prod_k=0^m(x+k)=sum_k=0^mfracA_k^(m)x+m$$
And it is a simple calculation to show that
$$f_m-1(x)-f_m-1(x+1)=mf_m(x)$$
So, comparing coefficients of $frac1x+k$ we have $A_0^(m-1)=mA_0^(m)$, $A_m-1^(m-1)=-mA_m^(m)$, and $A_k^(m-1)-A_k-1^(m-1)=mA_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. If we let $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!B_k^(m)$ then our difference equations read $B_0^(m-1)=B_0^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=A_0^(0)=1$, $B_m-1^(m-1)=B_m^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=1$ and $B_k^(m-1)+B_k-1^(m-1)=B_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. We recognize these as the difference equations for Pascal's triangle, so $B_k^(m)=mchoose k$ so it follows that $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!mchoose k$ and
$$int f_m(x)dx=sum_k=0^mfrac(-1)^km!mchoose kln|x+k|+C$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We could set up a difference equation. Partial fractions indicates that
$$f_m(x)=frac1prod_k=0^m(x+k)=sum_k=0^mfracA_k^(m)x+m$$
And it is a simple calculation to show that
$$f_m-1(x)-f_m-1(x+1)=mf_m(x)$$
So, comparing coefficients of $frac1x+k$ we have $A_0^(m-1)=mA_0^(m)$, $A_m-1^(m-1)=-mA_m^(m)$, and $A_k^(m-1)-A_k-1^(m-1)=mA_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. If we let $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!B_k^(m)$ then our difference equations read $B_0^(m-1)=B_0^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=A_0^(0)=1$, $B_m-1^(m-1)=B_m^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=1$ and $B_k^(m-1)+B_k-1^(m-1)=B_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. We recognize these as the difference equations for Pascal's triangle, so $B_k^(m)=mchoose k$ so it follows that $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!mchoose k$ and
$$int f_m(x)dx=sum_k=0^mfrac(-1)^km!mchoose kln|x+k|+C$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We could set up a difference equation. Partial fractions indicates that
$$f_m(x)=frac1prod_k=0^m(x+k)=sum_k=0^mfracA_k^(m)x+m$$
And it is a simple calculation to show that
$$f_m-1(x)-f_m-1(x+1)=mf_m(x)$$
So, comparing coefficients of $frac1x+k$ we have $A_0^(m-1)=mA_0^(m)$, $A_m-1^(m-1)=-mA_m^(m)$, and $A_k^(m-1)-A_k-1^(m-1)=mA_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. If we let $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!B_k^(m)$ then our difference equations read $B_0^(m-1)=B_0^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=A_0^(0)=1$, $B_m-1^(m-1)=B_m^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=1$ and $B_k^(m-1)+B_k-1^(m-1)=B_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. We recognize these as the difference equations for Pascal's triangle, so $B_k^(m)=mchoose k$ so it follows that $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!mchoose k$ and
$$int f_m(x)dx=sum_k=0^mfrac(-1)^km!mchoose kln|x+k|+C$$
$endgroup$
We could set up a difference equation. Partial fractions indicates that
$$f_m(x)=frac1prod_k=0^m(x+k)=sum_k=0^mfracA_k^(m)x+m$$
And it is a simple calculation to show that
$$f_m-1(x)-f_m-1(x+1)=mf_m(x)$$
So, comparing coefficients of $frac1x+k$ we have $A_0^(m-1)=mA_0^(m)$, $A_m-1^(m-1)=-mA_m^(m)$, and $A_k^(m-1)-A_k-1^(m-1)=mA_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. If we let $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!B_k^(m)$ then our difference equations read $B_0^(m-1)=B_0^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=A_0^(0)=1$, $B_m-1^(m-1)=B_m^(m)=cdots=B_0^(0)=1$ and $B_k^(m-1)+B_k-1^(m-1)=B_k^(m)$ for $1le kle m-1$. We recognize these as the difference equations for Pascal's triangle, so $B_k^(m)=mchoose k$ so it follows that $A_k^(m)=frac(-1)^km!mchoose k$ and
$$int f_m(x)dx=sum_k=0^mfrac(-1)^km!mchoose kln|x+k|+C$$
answered May 20 at 4:49
user5713492user5713492
11.2k2919
11.2k2919
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3232158%2fa-nasty-indefinite-integral-int-frac1xx1x2x3x4-xm-dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What's your question?
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:05
2
$begingroup$
@user376343 - From the opening of the post, "I am hoping somebody can check my work."
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
May 19 at 19:07
3
$begingroup$
It seems it is right, but the powers of $-1$ must be in parentheses. ... and it is usual to put them in numerators rather than in denominators.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 19:12
3
$begingroup$
There are no mistakes in your work per se. However, you should try to make solutions to problems as concise as possible without sacrificing clarity. If I were teaching a class how to do this problem, I would probably show all the work you showed in your answer. If I were doing this problem for homework, I would set up a standard induction argument. Base cases ($m = 0$, $m = 1$): $ldots$. Inductive step: $ldots$. Your prof probably doesn't want to see your thought process; he just wants to see a clear and complete solution.
$endgroup$
– Charles Hudgins
May 19 at 19:57
2
$begingroup$
@Bob the powers of $−1$ must be in parentheses, otherwise it is always $-1$.
$endgroup$
– user376343
May 19 at 20:20