Why is the reciprocal used in fraction division?How to make sense of fractions?How do I rewrite -100+1/2 as the mixed number -99 1/2?Fraction exponents in divisionfraction division understandingFraction and Decimal: Reciprocal of x's non-integerWhy was I taught to convert “improper fractions” into mixed numbers?The division of a fraction - Whole or Part?division by fraction proofWhen dividing by a fraction, why can you not take the reciprocal of term involving addition/subtraction?How to tell when a fraction does not end?Basic division problem: dividing a fraction by a fraction

What is the object moving across the ceiling in this stock footage?

Alignment: "Breaking out" of environment (enumerate / minipage)

Count rotary dial pulses in a phone number (including letters)

Grammar Question Regarding "Are the" or "Is the" When Referring to Something that May or May not be Plural

Is the Indo-European language family made up?

Is it possible to play as a necromancer skeleton?

Why do most published works in medical imaging try to reduce false positives?

Is it rude to call a professor by their last name with no prefix in a non-academic setting?

Construct a word ladder

What are the real benefits of using Salesforce DX?

Why does Mjolnir fall down in Age of Ultron but not in Endgame?

Why did David Cameron offer a referendum on the European Union?

Why did the person in charge of a principality not just declare themself king?

Where's this lookout in Nova Scotia?

How to patch glass cuts in a bicycle tire?

Any advice on creating fictional locations in real places when writing historical fiction?

Where can I find visible/radio telescopic observations of the center of the Milky Way galaxy?

Does Nitrogen inside commercial airliner wheels prevent blowouts on touchdown?

Why are C64 games inconsistent with which joystick port they use?

How did these characters "suit up" so quickly?

Inconsistent results from Wolfram Could

Did 20% of US soldiers in Vietnam use heroin, 95% of whom quit afterwards?

At what point in European history could a government build a printing press given a basic description?

Where have Brexit voters gone?



Why is the reciprocal used in fraction division?


How to make sense of fractions?How do I rewrite -100+1/2 as the mixed number -99 1/2?Fraction exponents in divisionfraction division understandingFraction and Decimal: Reciprocal of x's non-integerWhy was I taught to convert “improper fractions” into mixed numbers?The division of a fraction - Whole or Part?division by fraction proofWhen dividing by a fraction, why can you not take the reciprocal of term involving addition/subtraction?How to tell when a fraction does not end?Basic division problem: dividing a fraction by a fraction













4












$begingroup$


I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.



As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.



For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.



Any response is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    May 20 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
    $endgroup$
    – rash
    May 20 at 2:45










  • $begingroup$
    Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    May 20 at 3:14
















4












$begingroup$


I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.



As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.



For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.



Any response is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    May 20 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
    $endgroup$
    – rash
    May 20 at 2:45










  • $begingroup$
    Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    May 20 at 3:14














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.



As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.



For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.



Any response is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.



As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.



For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.



Any response is appreciated.







fractions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked May 20 at 2:32









ArgusArgus

21418




21418











  • $begingroup$
    This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    May 20 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
    $endgroup$
    – rash
    May 20 at 2:45










  • $begingroup$
    Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    May 20 at 3:14

















  • $begingroup$
    This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    May 20 at 2:40










  • $begingroup$
    If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
    $endgroup$
    – rash
    May 20 at 2:45










  • $begingroup$
    Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    May 20 at 3:14
















$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 20 at 2:40




$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 20 at 2:40












$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
May 20 at 2:45




$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
May 20 at 2:45












$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
May 20 at 3:14





$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
May 20 at 3:14











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
$$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
works.
And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
$$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
$$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      There are already some excellent algebraic answers to this question, but I'd like to provide an answer based on the grade school meaning of division.



      When we divide 20 by 4, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 20 items distributed evenly to 4 piles, how many items are in each pile?"



      When we divide 8 by a third, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 8 items distributed evenly to a third of a pile, how many items are in each whole pile?"



      Because each third of a pile has 8, and we want to know how much a whole pile (3 times larger) has, we can use multiplication to compute the answer as 24. Using multiplication of the inverse is just a handy shortcut though, and need not be though of as division itself.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor



      Jeffrey Nichols is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      $endgroup$













        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3232527%2fwhy-is-the-reciprocal-used-in-fraction-division%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        9












        $begingroup$

        I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
        $$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
        works.
        And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



        We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



        When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
        $$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
        And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
        $$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
        like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



        This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



        Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          9












          $begingroup$

          I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
          $$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
          works.
          And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



          We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



          When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
          $$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
          And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
          $$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
          like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



          This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



          Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            9












            9








            9





            $begingroup$

            I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
            $$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
            works.
            And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



            We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



            When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
            $$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
            And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
            $$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
            like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



            This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



            Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
            $$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
            works.
            And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



            We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



            When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
            $$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
            And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
            $$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
            like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



            This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



            Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited May 20 at 3:03

























            answered May 20 at 2:54









            Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

            247k17316561




            247k17316561





















                0












                $begingroup$

                Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor



                Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                $endgroup$

















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result






                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  $endgroup$















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result






                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    New contributor



                    Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$



                    Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result







                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    New contributor



                    Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer






                    New contributor



                    Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    answered May 20 at 3:05









                    Mario AldeanMario Aldean

                    187




                    187




                    New contributor



                    Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




                    New contributor




                    Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        There are already some excellent algebraic answers to this question, but I'd like to provide an answer based on the grade school meaning of division.



                        When we divide 20 by 4, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 20 items distributed evenly to 4 piles, how many items are in each pile?"



                        When we divide 8 by a third, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 8 items distributed evenly to a third of a pile, how many items are in each whole pile?"



                        Because each third of a pile has 8, and we want to know how much a whole pile (3 times larger) has, we can use multiplication to compute the answer as 24. Using multiplication of the inverse is just a handy shortcut though, and need not be though of as division itself.






                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        New contributor



                        Jeffrey Nichols is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          There are already some excellent algebraic answers to this question, but I'd like to provide an answer based on the grade school meaning of division.



                          When we divide 20 by 4, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 20 items distributed evenly to 4 piles, how many items are in each pile?"



                          When we divide 8 by a third, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 8 items distributed evenly to a third of a pile, how many items are in each whole pile?"



                          Because each third of a pile has 8, and we want to know how much a whole pile (3 times larger) has, we can use multiplication to compute the answer as 24. Using multiplication of the inverse is just a handy shortcut though, and need not be though of as division itself.






                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          New contributor



                          Jeffrey Nichols is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            There are already some excellent algebraic answers to this question, but I'd like to provide an answer based on the grade school meaning of division.



                            When we divide 20 by 4, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 20 items distributed evenly to 4 piles, how many items are in each pile?"



                            When we divide 8 by a third, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 8 items distributed evenly to a third of a pile, how many items are in each whole pile?"



                            Because each third of a pile has 8, and we want to know how much a whole pile (3 times larger) has, we can use multiplication to compute the answer as 24. Using multiplication of the inverse is just a handy shortcut though, and need not be though of as division itself.






                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor



                            Jeffrey Nichols is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            $endgroup$



                            There are already some excellent algebraic answers to this question, but I'd like to provide an answer based on the grade school meaning of division.



                            When we divide 20 by 4, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 20 items distributed evenly to 4 piles, how many items are in each pile?"



                            When we divide 8 by a third, we're asking for the answer to the question "Given 8 items distributed evenly to a third of a pile, how many items are in each whole pile?"



                            Because each third of a pile has 8, and we want to know how much a whole pile (3 times larger) has, we can use multiplication to compute the answer as 24. Using multiplication of the inverse is just a handy shortcut though, and need not be though of as division itself.







                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor



                            Jeffrey Nichols is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.








                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer






                            New contributor



                            Jeffrey Nichols is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.








                            answered May 20 at 13:19









                            Jeffrey NicholsJeffrey Nichols

                            1011




                            1011




                            New contributor



                            Jeffrey Nichols is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.




                            New contributor




                            Jeffrey Nichols is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3232527%2fwhy-is-the-reciprocal-used-in-fraction-division%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                                Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?