CaSO4 precipitate in mixture of Na2SO4 and CaCl2 solutionsIs solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?How are solubilities of hydrate salts determined when competing equilibria are unavoidable?The behaviour of Ag3PO4 in solutionYellow precipitate in SnCl2 solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyPrecipitation reaction stoichiometry?How much calcium hydroxide will precipitate after addition of sodium hydroxide into saturated calcium hydroxide solution?Volume of NaOH needed to precipitate copper(II) but not calciumFinding mass percentage of components of a solid mixturePrecipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride
Easier way to draw a filled ellipse with top edge dashed and bottom edge solid?
Addressing an email
Working hours and productivity expectations for game artists and programmers
Germany rejected my entry to Schengen countries
What does this 'x' mean on the stem of the voice's note, above the notehead?
Why did Nick Fury not hesitate in blowing up the plane he thought was carrying a nuke?
FIFO data structure in pure C
Why does the U.S military use mercenaries?
How to safely discharge oneself
Windows reverting changes made by Linux to FAT32 partition
Is presenting a play showing Military charactes in a bad light a crime in the US?
Can 2 light bulbs of 120V in series be used on 230V AC?
Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?
Why does snapping your fingers activate the Infinity Gauntlet?
How can I prevent Bash expansion from passing files starting with "-" as argument?
Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?
What does it mean for a program to be 32 or 64 bit?
Is being an extrovert a necessary condition to be a manager?
How to determine the distribution of Ubuntu
How could the B-29 bomber back up under its own power?
Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand
How do we explain the use of a software on a math paper?
Are there any crystals that are theoretically possible, but haven't yet been made?
How to convince boss to spend notice period on documentation instead of new projects
CaSO4 precipitate in mixture of Na2SO4 and CaCl2 solutions
Is solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?How are solubilities of hydrate salts determined when competing equilibria are unavoidable?The behaviour of Ag3PO4 in solutionYellow precipitate in SnCl2 solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyPrecipitation reaction stoichiometry?How much calcium hydroxide will precipitate after addition of sodium hydroxide into saturated calcium hydroxide solution?Volume of NaOH needed to precipitate copper(II) but not calciumFinding mass percentage of components of a solid mixturePrecipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride
$begingroup$
I have been stuck on a chemistry problem for a long time now and if anyone here can help me I would be eternally grateful.
40. Du tillsätter $pu100 ml$ $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning i $pu100 ml$ $pu0,02 M$ $ceCaCl2$-lösning. Det bildas en $ceCaSO4$-fällning. Hur mycket av $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning måste ännu tillsättas för att den bildade $ceCaSO4$-fällningen just och just ska upplösas helt? $K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2,5e-5 M$. $(t = pu25 °C)$ (2p)
a. $pu0,43 l$
b. $pu0,48 l$
c. $pu0,53 l$
d. $pu0,58 l$
Translation: We add 100 ml of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution to 100 ml of 0.02 M $ceCaCl2$-solution. A precipitate of $ceCaSO4$ is formed. What is the (minimal) volume of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution that needs to be added to the mix for the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate to be just dissolved completely?
The problem then lists the solubility constant, $K_mathrms$, for $ceCaSO4$ as $2.5cdot 10^-5$.
The only way I can think of solving this myself is by looking at the added $ceNa2SO4$-solution as just water and using the $K_mathrms$ value for $ceCaSO4$ to see what concentration of $ceCaSO4$ is possible in just water. Then calculate the amount of moles of precipitate that was actually formed to see how much water I would need to add to the mixture:
$$K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2.5e-5 M^2 = [ceCa^2+][ceSO4^2-]$$
$$therefore [ceCa^2+] = [ceSO4^2-] = sqrtpu2.5e-5 M^2 = pu5e-3 M$$
$$C = fracnV to n = CV$$
Amount of precipitate formed:
$$n(ceCaSO4) = pu0.02 M cdot pu0.1 dm^3 = pu0.002 mol$$
Required total volume of water to dissolve $pu0.002 mol$ of $ceCaSO4$:
$$V = fracnC = fracpu0.002 molpu5e-3 M = pu0.4 dm^3$$
This is wrong, but I can't figure out the right way to go about this. The answer surely has to do with how well $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved in a $ceNa2SO4$-solution as opposed to just water.
inorganic-chemistry solubility precipitation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been stuck on a chemistry problem for a long time now and if anyone here can help me I would be eternally grateful.
40. Du tillsätter $pu100 ml$ $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning i $pu100 ml$ $pu0,02 M$ $ceCaCl2$-lösning. Det bildas en $ceCaSO4$-fällning. Hur mycket av $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning måste ännu tillsättas för att den bildade $ceCaSO4$-fällningen just och just ska upplösas helt? $K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2,5e-5 M$. $(t = pu25 °C)$ (2p)
a. $pu0,43 l$
b. $pu0,48 l$
c. $pu0,53 l$
d. $pu0,58 l$
Translation: We add 100 ml of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution to 100 ml of 0.02 M $ceCaCl2$-solution. A precipitate of $ceCaSO4$ is formed. What is the (minimal) volume of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution that needs to be added to the mix for the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate to be just dissolved completely?
The problem then lists the solubility constant, $K_mathrms$, for $ceCaSO4$ as $2.5cdot 10^-5$.
The only way I can think of solving this myself is by looking at the added $ceNa2SO4$-solution as just water and using the $K_mathrms$ value for $ceCaSO4$ to see what concentration of $ceCaSO4$ is possible in just water. Then calculate the amount of moles of precipitate that was actually formed to see how much water I would need to add to the mixture:
$$K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2.5e-5 M^2 = [ceCa^2+][ceSO4^2-]$$
$$therefore [ceCa^2+] = [ceSO4^2-] = sqrtpu2.5e-5 M^2 = pu5e-3 M$$
$$C = fracnV to n = CV$$
Amount of precipitate formed:
$$n(ceCaSO4) = pu0.02 M cdot pu0.1 dm^3 = pu0.002 mol$$
Required total volume of water to dissolve $pu0.002 mol$ of $ceCaSO4$:
$$V = fracnC = fracpu0.002 molpu5e-3 M = pu0.4 dm^3$$
This is wrong, but I can't figure out the right way to go about this. The answer surely has to do with how well $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved in a $ceNa2SO4$-solution as opposed to just water.
inorganic-chemistry solubility precipitation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been stuck on a chemistry problem for a long time now and if anyone here can help me I would be eternally grateful.
40. Du tillsätter $pu100 ml$ $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning i $pu100 ml$ $pu0,02 M$ $ceCaCl2$-lösning. Det bildas en $ceCaSO4$-fällning. Hur mycket av $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning måste ännu tillsättas för att den bildade $ceCaSO4$-fällningen just och just ska upplösas helt? $K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2,5e-5 M$. $(t = pu25 °C)$ (2p)
a. $pu0,43 l$
b. $pu0,48 l$
c. $pu0,53 l$
d. $pu0,58 l$
Translation: We add 100 ml of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution to 100 ml of 0.02 M $ceCaCl2$-solution. A precipitate of $ceCaSO4$ is formed. What is the (minimal) volume of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution that needs to be added to the mix for the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate to be just dissolved completely?
The problem then lists the solubility constant, $K_mathrms$, for $ceCaSO4$ as $2.5cdot 10^-5$.
The only way I can think of solving this myself is by looking at the added $ceNa2SO4$-solution as just water and using the $K_mathrms$ value for $ceCaSO4$ to see what concentration of $ceCaSO4$ is possible in just water. Then calculate the amount of moles of precipitate that was actually formed to see how much water I would need to add to the mixture:
$$K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2.5e-5 M^2 = [ceCa^2+][ceSO4^2-]$$
$$therefore [ceCa^2+] = [ceSO4^2-] = sqrtpu2.5e-5 M^2 = pu5e-3 M$$
$$C = fracnV to n = CV$$
Amount of precipitate formed:
$$n(ceCaSO4) = pu0.02 M cdot pu0.1 dm^3 = pu0.002 mol$$
Required total volume of water to dissolve $pu0.002 mol$ of $ceCaSO4$:
$$V = fracnC = fracpu0.002 molpu5e-3 M = pu0.4 dm^3$$
This is wrong, but I can't figure out the right way to go about this. The answer surely has to do with how well $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved in a $ceNa2SO4$-solution as opposed to just water.
inorganic-chemistry solubility precipitation
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have been stuck on a chemistry problem for a long time now and if anyone here can help me I would be eternally grateful.
40. Du tillsätter $pu100 ml$ $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning i $pu100 ml$ $pu0,02 M$ $ceCaCl2$-lösning. Det bildas en $ceCaSO4$-fällning. Hur mycket av $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning måste ännu tillsättas för att den bildade $ceCaSO4$-fällningen just och just ska upplösas helt? $K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2,5e-5 M$. $(t = pu25 °C)$ (2p)
a. $pu0,43 l$
b. $pu0,48 l$
c. $pu0,53 l$
d. $pu0,58 l$
Translation: We add 100 ml of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution to 100 ml of 0.02 M $ceCaCl2$-solution. A precipitate of $ceCaSO4$ is formed. What is the (minimal) volume of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution that needs to be added to the mix for the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate to be just dissolved completely?
The problem then lists the solubility constant, $K_mathrms$, for $ceCaSO4$ as $2.5cdot 10^-5$.
The only way I can think of solving this myself is by looking at the added $ceNa2SO4$-solution as just water and using the $K_mathrms$ value for $ceCaSO4$ to see what concentration of $ceCaSO4$ is possible in just water. Then calculate the amount of moles of precipitate that was actually formed to see how much water I would need to add to the mixture:
$$K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2.5e-5 M^2 = [ceCa^2+][ceSO4^2-]$$
$$therefore [ceCa^2+] = [ceSO4^2-] = sqrtpu2.5e-5 M^2 = pu5e-3 M$$
$$C = fracnV to n = CV$$
Amount of precipitate formed:
$$n(ceCaSO4) = pu0.02 M cdot pu0.1 dm^3 = pu0.002 mol$$
Required total volume of water to dissolve $pu0.002 mol$ of $ceCaSO4$:
$$V = fracnC = fracpu0.002 molpu5e-3 M = pu0.4 dm^3$$
This is wrong, but I can't figure out the right way to go about this. The answer surely has to do with how well $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved in a $ceNa2SO4$-solution as opposed to just water.
inorganic-chemistry solubility precipitation
inorganic-chemistry solubility precipitation
New contributor
New contributor
edited May 13 at 15:06
Karsten Theis
6,005947
6,005947
New contributor
asked May 13 at 6:19
DumbstudentDumbstudent
212
212
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.
Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:
The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.
The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.
The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.
We have then the following relationship:
$$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$
Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:
$$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$
The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:
$$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$
To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.
$$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$
From this, we can figure out the concentration:
$$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
$$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
The product has to be equal to $K_s$:
$$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$
This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:34
2
$begingroup$
This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
May 13 at 15:45
$begingroup$
Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
May 13 at 17:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.
You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$
The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.
To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.
Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.
We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.
$K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $
Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,
$ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$
The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:
$ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Now making the substitutions:
$K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Dumbstudent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115225%2fcaso4-precipitate-in-mixture-of-na2so4-and-cacl2-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.
Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:
The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.
The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.
The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.
We have then the following relationship:
$$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$
Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:
$$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$
The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.
Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:
The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.
The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.
The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.
We have then the following relationship:
$$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$
Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:
$$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$
The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.
Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:
The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.
The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.
The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.
We have then the following relationship:
$$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$
Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:
$$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$
The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.
$endgroup$
As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.
Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:
The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.
The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.
The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.
We have then the following relationship:
$$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$
Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:
$$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$
The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.
answered May 13 at 15:19
ZheZhe
13.5k12754
13.5k12754
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:
$$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$
To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.
$$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$
From this, we can figure out the concentration:
$$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
$$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
The product has to be equal to $K_s$:
$$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$
This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:34
2
$begingroup$
This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
May 13 at 15:45
$begingroup$
Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
May 13 at 17:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:
$$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$
To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.
$$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$
From this, we can figure out the concentration:
$$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
$$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
The product has to be equal to $K_s$:
$$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$
This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:34
2
$begingroup$
This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
May 13 at 15:45
$begingroup$
Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
May 13 at 17:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:
$$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$
To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.
$$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$
From this, we can figure out the concentration:
$$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
$$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
The product has to be equal to $K_s$:
$$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$
This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.
$endgroup$
When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:
$$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$
To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.
$$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$
From this, we can figure out the concentration:
$$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
$$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$
The product has to be equal to $K_s$:
$$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$
This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.
edited May 13 at 17:51
Mathew Mahindaratne
7,5181030
7,5181030
answered May 13 at 15:23
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
6,005947
6,005947
2
$begingroup$
I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:34
2
$begingroup$
This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
May 13 at 15:45
$begingroup$
Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
May 13 at 17:12
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:34
2
$begingroup$
This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
May 13 at 15:45
$begingroup$
Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
May 13 at 17:12
2
2
$begingroup$
I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:34
$begingroup$
I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:34
2
2
$begingroup$
This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
May 13 at 15:45
$begingroup$
This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
May 13 at 15:45
$begingroup$
Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
May 13 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
May 13 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
May 13 at 17:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.
You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$
The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.
To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.
Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.
We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.
$K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $
Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,
$ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$
The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:
$ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Now making the substitutions:
$K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.
You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$
The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.
To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.
Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.
We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.
$K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $
Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,
$ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$
The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:
$ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Now making the substitutions:
$K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.
You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$
The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.
To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.
Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.
We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.
$K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $
Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,
$ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$
The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:
$ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Now making the substitutions:
$K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$
$endgroup$
Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.
You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$
The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.
To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.
Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.
We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.
$K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $
Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,
$ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$
The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:
$ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Now making the substitutions:
$K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$
Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$
edited May 13 at 18:18
Mathew Mahindaratne
7,5181030
7,5181030
answered May 13 at 15:29
MaxWMaxW
16.4k22363
16.4k22363
add a comment |
add a comment |
Dumbstudent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dumbstudent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dumbstudent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dumbstudent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115225%2fcaso4-precipitate-in-mixture-of-na2so4-and-cacl2-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown