Clarify a step in the proof that if $limfracf(x)g(x)$ exists, then $lim(1+f(x))^1/g(x)=e^lim f(x)/g(x)$Finding $lim limits_x to 0 frac1 - cos xx$, given $lim limits_x to 0 fracsin xx = 1$Calculating the limit: $lim limits_x to 0$ $fracln(fracsin xx)x^2. $Spot mistake in finding $lim limits_xto1left(frac x x-1 - frac1 log(x) right)$Proving the surprising limit: $limlimits_n to 0 fracx^n-y^nn$ $=$ log$fracxy$Limit of this expression $ lim limits_nto infty left( frac15n+7n logleft( nright) right) $Question about prove when $x_n$ and $y_n$ convergent $lim x_n = lim y_n$ where $x_n+1=fracx_n+y_n2$, $y_n+1=frac2x_ny_nx_n+y_n$Calculate $limlimits_n to infty frac1ncdotlogleft(3^fracn1 + 3^fracn2 + dots + 3^fracnnright)$Proving that $limlimits_h to 0frac-h$ does not exist at $x=0$How can I solve $limlimits_n to infty fracn log_2 log_2 n3^log_2 n^2= 0$Is this way of finding $limlimits_xto +infty(x-ln(x^2+1))$ valid?

Why does string strummed with finger sound different from the one strummed with pick?

Why were early aviators' trousers flared at the thigh?

How to fix "webpack Dev Server Invalid Options" in Vuejs

Is there any official Lore on Keraptis the Wizard, apart from what is in White Plume Mountain?

Does ratifying USMCA imply a (stealth) ratification of UNCLOS?

Why favour the standard WP loop over iterating over (new WP_Query())->get_posts()?

Can a problematic AL DM/organizer prevent me from running a separatate AL-legal game at the same store?

Can 2 light bulbs of 120V in series be used on 230V AC?

How does the "reverse syntax" in Middle English work?

Warped chessboard

Gambler's Fallacy Dice

Why is python script running in background consuming 100 % CPU?

Have the writers and actors of Game Of Thrones responded to its poor reception?

How to choose the correct exposure for flower photography?

Why did Nick Fury not hesitate in blowing up the plane he thought was carrying a nuke?

Can a Warforged have a ranged weapon affixed to them like an armblade?

Is it a good idea to teach algorithm courses using pseudocode instead of a real programming language?

Bash - Execute two commands and get exit status 1 if first fails

Is being an extrovert a necessary condition to be a manager?

Addressing an email

How to convince boss to spend notice period on documentation instead of new projects

Bash Read: Reading comma separated list, last element is missed

How can I prevent Bash expansion from passing files starting with "-" as argument?

What city and town structures are important in a low fantasy medieval world?



Clarify a step in the proof that if $limfracf(x)g(x)$ exists, then $lim(1+f(x))^1/g(x)=e^lim f(x)/g(x)$


Finding $lim limits_x to 0 frac1 - cos xx$, given $lim limits_x to 0 fracsin xx = 1$Calculating the limit: $lim limits_x to 0$ $fracln(fracsin xx)x^2. $Spot mistake in finding $lim limits_xto1left(frac x x-1 - frac1 log(x) right)$Proving the surprising limit: $limlimits_n to 0 fracx^n-y^nn$ $=$ log$fracxy$Limit of this expression $ lim limits_nto infty left( frac15n+7n logleft( nright) right) $Question about prove when $x_n$ and $y_n$ convergent $lim x_n = lim y_n$ where $x_n+1=fracx_n+y_n2$, $y_n+1=frac2x_ny_nx_n+y_n$Calculate $limlimits_n to infty frac1ncdotlogleft(3^fracn1 + 3^fracn2 + dots + 3^fracnnright)$Proving that $limlimits_h to 0frach$ does not exist at $x=0$How can I solve $limlimits_n to infty fracn log_2 log_2 n3^log_2 n^2= 0$Is this way of finding $limlimits_xto +infty(x-ln(x^2+1))$ valid?













1












$begingroup$



There is a theorem which says "If $limlimits_xto a f(x) =limlimits_xto a g(x)=0$ such that $limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$ exists, then $limlimits_x to a 1+f(x)^frac1g(x) = e^limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$




The proof for this theorem goes as such:
$$textLet A=lim_xto a 1+f(x)^1over g(x).text Then, $$
$$log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)g(x)$$
$$implies log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)f(x) cdot fracf(x)g(x)$$
$$implies log_e A = lim_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$$
$$implies A=e^limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$$



Now my doubt here is... how did the first step become second step by taking log on both sides? How did the log go inside the limit? That is my confusion.



That is, $A=lim_xto a 1+f(x)^1over g(x)$ became $log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)g(x)$. How?

Hope you get what my doubt is. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$



    There is a theorem which says "If $limlimits_xto a f(x) =limlimits_xto a g(x)=0$ such that $limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$ exists, then $limlimits_x to a 1+f(x)^frac1g(x) = e^limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$




    The proof for this theorem goes as such:
    $$textLet A=lim_xto a 1+f(x)^1over g(x).text Then, $$
    $$log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)g(x)$$
    $$implies log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)f(x) cdot fracf(x)g(x)$$
    $$implies log_e A = lim_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$$
    $$implies A=e^limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$$



    Now my doubt here is... how did the first step become second step by taking log on both sides? How did the log go inside the limit? That is my confusion.



    That is, $A=lim_xto a 1+f(x)^1over g(x)$ became $log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)g(x)$. How?

    Hope you get what my doubt is. Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$



      There is a theorem which says "If $limlimits_xto a f(x) =limlimits_xto a g(x)=0$ such that $limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$ exists, then $limlimits_x to a 1+f(x)^frac1g(x) = e^limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$




      The proof for this theorem goes as such:
      $$textLet A=lim_xto a 1+f(x)^1over g(x).text Then, $$
      $$log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)g(x)$$
      $$implies log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)f(x) cdot fracf(x)g(x)$$
      $$implies log_e A = lim_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$$
      $$implies A=e^limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$$



      Now my doubt here is... how did the first step become second step by taking log on both sides? How did the log go inside the limit? That is my confusion.



      That is, $A=lim_xto a 1+f(x)^1over g(x)$ became $log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)g(x)$. How?

      Hope you get what my doubt is. Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      There is a theorem which says "If $limlimits_xto a f(x) =limlimits_xto a g(x)=0$ such that $limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$ exists, then $limlimits_x to a 1+f(x)^frac1g(x) = e^limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$




      The proof for this theorem goes as such:
      $$textLet A=lim_xto a 1+f(x)^1over g(x).text Then, $$
      $$log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)g(x)$$
      $$implies log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)f(x) cdot fracf(x)g(x)$$
      $$implies log_e A = lim_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$$
      $$implies A=e^limlimits_xto a fracf(x)g(x)$$



      Now my doubt here is... how did the first step become second step by taking log on both sides? How did the log go inside the limit? That is my confusion.



      That is, $A=lim_xto a 1+f(x)^1over g(x)$ became $log_e A = lim_xto a fraclog1+f(x)g(x)$. How?

      Hope you get what my doubt is. Thanks.







      calculus limits






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited May 13 at 15:54









      Nick

      318113




      318113










      asked May 13 at 14:07









      rashrash

      636216




      636216




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Regarding your question about the first step: $ln$ is continuous, i.e. you can write the limit inside this function (given that it exists). The $g(x)$ in the denominator comes from the fact that $$ln(a^b)=bln(a),$$ where you can choose $a=1+f(x)$ and $b=1/g(x)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            The theorem is false: take the constant functions $f(x)=g(x)=1.$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              How is it false?
              $endgroup$
              – rash
              May 13 at 14:19







            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @rash It is correct now, but it used to be false before you edited your question.
              $endgroup$
              – st.math
              May 13 at 14:24











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3224481%2fclarify-a-step-in-the-proof-that-if-lim-fracfxgx-exists-then-lim1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            Regarding your question about the first step: $ln$ is continuous, i.e. you can write the limit inside this function (given that it exists). The $g(x)$ in the denominator comes from the fact that $$ln(a^b)=bln(a),$$ where you can choose $a=1+f(x)$ and $b=1/g(x)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              Regarding your question about the first step: $ln$ is continuous, i.e. you can write the limit inside this function (given that it exists). The $g(x)$ in the denominator comes from the fact that $$ln(a^b)=bln(a),$$ where you can choose $a=1+f(x)$ and $b=1/g(x)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                Regarding your question about the first step: $ln$ is continuous, i.e. you can write the limit inside this function (given that it exists). The $g(x)$ in the denominator comes from the fact that $$ln(a^b)=bln(a),$$ where you can choose $a=1+f(x)$ and $b=1/g(x)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Regarding your question about the first step: $ln$ is continuous, i.e. you can write the limit inside this function (given that it exists). The $g(x)$ in the denominator comes from the fact that $$ln(a^b)=bln(a),$$ where you can choose $a=1+f(x)$ and $b=1/g(x)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered May 13 at 14:13









                st.mathst.math

                1,453215




                1,453215





















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    The theorem is false: take the constant functions $f(x)=g(x)=1.$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      How is it false?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rash
                      May 13 at 14:19







                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      @rash It is correct now, but it used to be false before you edited your question.
                      $endgroup$
                      – st.math
                      May 13 at 14:24















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    The theorem is false: take the constant functions $f(x)=g(x)=1.$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      How is it false?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rash
                      May 13 at 14:19







                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      @rash It is correct now, but it used to be false before you edited your question.
                      $endgroup$
                      – st.math
                      May 13 at 14:24













                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    The theorem is false: take the constant functions $f(x)=g(x)=1.$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The theorem is false: take the constant functions $f(x)=g(x)=1.$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered May 13 at 14:13









                    FredFred

                    49.7k11849




                    49.7k11849











                    • $begingroup$
                      How is it false?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rash
                      May 13 at 14:19







                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      @rash It is correct now, but it used to be false before you edited your question.
                      $endgroup$
                      – st.math
                      May 13 at 14:24
















                    • $begingroup$
                      How is it false?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rash
                      May 13 at 14:19







                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      @rash It is correct now, but it used to be false before you edited your question.
                      $endgroup$
                      – st.math
                      May 13 at 14:24















                    $begingroup$
                    How is it false?
                    $endgroup$
                    – rash
                    May 13 at 14:19





                    $begingroup$
                    How is it false?
                    $endgroup$
                    – rash
                    May 13 at 14:19





                    3




                    3




                    $begingroup$
                    @rash It is correct now, but it used to be false before you edited your question.
                    $endgroup$
                    – st.math
                    May 13 at 14:24




                    $begingroup$
                    @rash It is correct now, but it used to be false before you edited your question.
                    $endgroup$
                    – st.math
                    May 13 at 14:24

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3224481%2fclarify-a-step-in-the-proof-that-if-lim-fracfxgx-exists-then-lim1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                    Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                    Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?