How to not get blinded by an attack at dawnMaking a medieval smoke bomb, quickly and reasonablyUnderwater Sneak Attack30,000 rhinos were to attack South America, will they survive?Attack Vectors for Supply Chain SabotageHow advanced can Weapons technology get without gunpowder?How much darker could the sun get without killing off the plants necessary for the production of oxygen?How would one attack or lay siege to a flying castle?How to realistically implement magic-users in medieval warfare?Possibility of using large asteroid as planetary attack weaponHow can medieval-like coalition defeat or force a modern army into submission?How would a medieval army conquer a treetop city?
Can the word crowd refer to just 10 people?
Latin words remembered from high school 50 years ago
Why aren't satellites disintegrated even though they orbit earth within earth's Roche Limits?
Parse a C++14 integer literal
Can I have a delimited macro with a literal # in the parameter text?
Can't think of a good word or term to describe not feeling or thinking
How do you cope with rejection?
How do I unravel apparent recursion in an edef statement?
Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?
Why did Nick Fury not hesitate in blowing up the plane he thought was carrying a nuke?
Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand
Why could the Lunar Ascent Engine be used only once?
Can a problematic AL DM/organizer prevent me from running a separate AL-legal game at the same store?
How to make labels automatically scale in size to fit between 2 coordinates in tikz?
What city and town structures are important in a low fantasy medieval world?
Why is so much ransomware breakable?
How to choose the correct exposure for flower photography?
Warped chessboard
Is there any official Lore on Keraptis the Wizard, apart from what is in White Plume Mountain?
Bookshelves: the intruder
Is it possible to view all the attribute data in QGIS
Working hours and productivity expectations for game artists and programmers
How can I prevent Bash expansion from passing files starting with "-" as argument?
Bash Read: Reading comma separated list, last element is missed
How to not get blinded by an attack at dawn
Making a medieval smoke bomb, quickly and reasonablyUnderwater Sneak Attack30,000 rhinos were to attack South America, will they survive?Attack Vectors for Supply Chain SabotageHow advanced can Weapons technology get without gunpowder?How much darker could the sun get without killing off the plants necessary for the production of oxygen?How would one attack or lay siege to a flying castle?How to realistically implement magic-users in medieval warfare?Possibility of using large asteroid as planetary attack weaponHow can medieval-like coalition defeat or force a modern army into submission?How would a medieval army conquer a treetop city?
$begingroup$
I'm imagining a low-tech medieval fantasy world where an attack at dawn such that the defenders are forced to look into the rising sun conveys a huge advantage. The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience. The armies are mostly wooden shield and spear equipped levies and normally a shield wall puts attackers at a disadvantage. On open ground at dawn, however, sun-blinded defenders, could have their line broken easily by a charge and face disorganization and defeat by a much smaller force. I'm hoping this will lead to interesting tactical decisions where terrain that defends against an east-to-west attacks becomes invaluable and forces are constantly maneuvering and taking risks to try to get the sun on their side.
My question is this, is there a portable tactic, or inexpensive tool that would allow defenders to avoid being blinded by the rising sun?
- The extremely vulnerable period lasts about 1 hour at dawn and dusk, however these humanoids lack night vision, so presumably a dusk attack is not as advantageous.
Medieval Oakley
sunglasses
are out due to expense.Other more expensive weapons and skilled soldiers like cavalry, archers, or heavy infantry are plausible only as small supplements to mostly non-professional armies
- Fabian strategies are allowed, but preserving villages and farmland is preferred
warfare sunlight low-fantasy
New contributor
$endgroup$
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm imagining a low-tech medieval fantasy world where an attack at dawn such that the defenders are forced to look into the rising sun conveys a huge advantage. The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience. The armies are mostly wooden shield and spear equipped levies and normally a shield wall puts attackers at a disadvantage. On open ground at dawn, however, sun-blinded defenders, could have their line broken easily by a charge and face disorganization and defeat by a much smaller force. I'm hoping this will lead to interesting tactical decisions where terrain that defends against an east-to-west attacks becomes invaluable and forces are constantly maneuvering and taking risks to try to get the sun on their side.
My question is this, is there a portable tactic, or inexpensive tool that would allow defenders to avoid being blinded by the rising sun?
- The extremely vulnerable period lasts about 1 hour at dawn and dusk, however these humanoids lack night vision, so presumably a dusk attack is not as advantageous.
Medieval Oakley
sunglasses
are out due to expense.Other more expensive weapons and skilled soldiers like cavalry, archers, or heavy infantry are plausible only as small supplements to mostly non-professional armies
- Fabian strategies are allowed, but preserving villages and farmland is preferred
warfare sunlight low-fantasy
New contributor
$endgroup$
19
$begingroup$
"At the dawn of the third day, look East..."
$endgroup$
– Nyakouai
May 13 at 14:09
10
$begingroup$
Rather than avoid being blinded by the sun, could they not mitigate it by using reflective objects to dazzle the attackers who have the sun to their backs?
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:15
4
$begingroup$
Am I correctly understanding that the question is basically: "My fantasy race is extremely susceptible to sun-glare. What kind of defensive preparations would they use to minimize their vulnerability?"
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 14:16
3
$begingroup$
@Nyakouai I believe that's "Look to my coming, at first light, on the fifth day. At dawn, look to the East."
$endgroup$
– Ash
May 13 at 14:19
6
$begingroup$
@lazarusL They don't need to be mirrors as you know them today, they only need to be highly polished objects. Mirrors in various forms have been around for a long time.
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:25
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm imagining a low-tech medieval fantasy world where an attack at dawn such that the defenders are forced to look into the rising sun conveys a huge advantage. The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience. The armies are mostly wooden shield and spear equipped levies and normally a shield wall puts attackers at a disadvantage. On open ground at dawn, however, sun-blinded defenders, could have their line broken easily by a charge and face disorganization and defeat by a much smaller force. I'm hoping this will lead to interesting tactical decisions where terrain that defends against an east-to-west attacks becomes invaluable and forces are constantly maneuvering and taking risks to try to get the sun on their side.
My question is this, is there a portable tactic, or inexpensive tool that would allow defenders to avoid being blinded by the rising sun?
- The extremely vulnerable period lasts about 1 hour at dawn and dusk, however these humanoids lack night vision, so presumably a dusk attack is not as advantageous.
Medieval Oakley
sunglasses
are out due to expense.Other more expensive weapons and skilled soldiers like cavalry, archers, or heavy infantry are plausible only as small supplements to mostly non-professional armies
- Fabian strategies are allowed, but preserving villages and farmland is preferred
warfare sunlight low-fantasy
New contributor
$endgroup$
I'm imagining a low-tech medieval fantasy world where an attack at dawn such that the defenders are forced to look into the rising sun conveys a huge advantage. The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience. The armies are mostly wooden shield and spear equipped levies and normally a shield wall puts attackers at a disadvantage. On open ground at dawn, however, sun-blinded defenders, could have their line broken easily by a charge and face disorganization and defeat by a much smaller force. I'm hoping this will lead to interesting tactical decisions where terrain that defends against an east-to-west attacks becomes invaluable and forces are constantly maneuvering and taking risks to try to get the sun on their side.
My question is this, is there a portable tactic, or inexpensive tool that would allow defenders to avoid being blinded by the rising sun?
- The extremely vulnerable period lasts about 1 hour at dawn and dusk, however these humanoids lack night vision, so presumably a dusk attack is not as advantageous.
Medieval Oakley
sunglasses
are out due to expense.Other more expensive weapons and skilled soldiers like cavalry, archers, or heavy infantry are plausible only as small supplements to mostly non-professional armies
- Fabian strategies are allowed, but preserving villages and farmland is preferred
warfare sunlight low-fantasy
warfare sunlight low-fantasy
New contributor
New contributor
edited May 13 at 21:11
Cyn
13.7k22965
13.7k22965
New contributor
asked May 13 at 14:07
lazarusLlazarusL
19825
19825
New contributor
New contributor
19
$begingroup$
"At the dawn of the third day, look East..."
$endgroup$
– Nyakouai
May 13 at 14:09
10
$begingroup$
Rather than avoid being blinded by the sun, could they not mitigate it by using reflective objects to dazzle the attackers who have the sun to their backs?
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:15
4
$begingroup$
Am I correctly understanding that the question is basically: "My fantasy race is extremely susceptible to sun-glare. What kind of defensive preparations would they use to minimize their vulnerability?"
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 14:16
3
$begingroup$
@Nyakouai I believe that's "Look to my coming, at first light, on the fifth day. At dawn, look to the East."
$endgroup$
– Ash
May 13 at 14:19
6
$begingroup$
@lazarusL They don't need to be mirrors as you know them today, they only need to be highly polished objects. Mirrors in various forms have been around for a long time.
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:25
|
show 6 more comments
19
$begingroup$
"At the dawn of the third day, look East..."
$endgroup$
– Nyakouai
May 13 at 14:09
10
$begingroup$
Rather than avoid being blinded by the sun, could they not mitigate it by using reflective objects to dazzle the attackers who have the sun to their backs?
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:15
4
$begingroup$
Am I correctly understanding that the question is basically: "My fantasy race is extremely susceptible to sun-glare. What kind of defensive preparations would they use to minimize their vulnerability?"
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 14:16
3
$begingroup$
@Nyakouai I believe that's "Look to my coming, at first light, on the fifth day. At dawn, look to the East."
$endgroup$
– Ash
May 13 at 14:19
6
$begingroup$
@lazarusL They don't need to be mirrors as you know them today, they only need to be highly polished objects. Mirrors in various forms have been around for a long time.
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:25
19
19
$begingroup$
"At the dawn of the third day, look East..."
$endgroup$
– Nyakouai
May 13 at 14:09
$begingroup$
"At the dawn of the third day, look East..."
$endgroup$
– Nyakouai
May 13 at 14:09
10
10
$begingroup$
Rather than avoid being blinded by the sun, could they not mitigate it by using reflective objects to dazzle the attackers who have the sun to their backs?
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:15
$begingroup$
Rather than avoid being blinded by the sun, could they not mitigate it by using reflective objects to dazzle the attackers who have the sun to their backs?
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:15
4
4
$begingroup$
Am I correctly understanding that the question is basically: "My fantasy race is extremely susceptible to sun-glare. What kind of defensive preparations would they use to minimize their vulnerability?"
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 14:16
$begingroup$
Am I correctly understanding that the question is basically: "My fantasy race is extremely susceptible to sun-glare. What kind of defensive preparations would they use to minimize their vulnerability?"
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 14:16
3
3
$begingroup$
@Nyakouai I believe that's "Look to my coming, at first light, on the fifth day. At dawn, look to the East."
$endgroup$
– Ash
May 13 at 14:19
$begingroup$
@Nyakouai I believe that's "Look to my coming, at first light, on the fifth day. At dawn, look to the East."
$endgroup$
– Ash
May 13 at 14:19
6
6
$begingroup$
@lazarusL They don't need to be mirrors as you know them today, they only need to be highly polished objects. Mirrors in various forms have been around for a long time.
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:25
$begingroup$
@lazarusL They don't need to be mirrors as you know them today, they only need to be highly polished objects. Mirrors in various forms have been around for a long time.
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:25
|
show 6 more comments
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You don't need high tech, or even glass, for light-reduction "glasses".
In real life, there are places where bright light is a problem - in snowfields in the north. People find ways to cope.
(Picture from a webpage about Inuits)
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
At first this seems like a good answer, because they're light-reduction glasses, right? But they only reduce the total amount of light entering the eyes, they don't change the intensity of the light that goes in through the slits. Works well when the problem is that all the snow all around you is reflecting the sunlight, but doesn't help at all with looking towards the sun. Also restricts your peripheral vision.
$endgroup$
– Jared K
May 13 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
+1 for simple answer But the picture is a bit misleading for OP's purpose. A slit would be a bad choice because it limits you vision to much but the same concept but only with a lot of small holes would do the trick just fine.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
May 14 at 7:40
2
$begingroup$
There is something I saw used in the movie Himalaya. They use an animal's hair (probably yak) that is black and just put it in front of their eyes. It's loose enough to let some light through, like an extra layer of eye lashes if you want.
$endgroup$
– Guimoute
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@JaredK - Wrong on both counts. As long as the vertical slit width is less than the diameter of the iris, peak intensity will be reduced. Likewise, for the illustrated "glasses", the long horizontal extent will proved excellent horizontal peripheral vision. Vertical extent is limited, but this is not likely a problem for the situation described.
$endgroup$
– WhatRoughBeast
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I imagine that army tactics in this world would evolve such that commanders would not put their troops in that situation in the first place - i.e. if they are expecting an attack in the open field from the direction of the rising sun, they have already made a gross tactical blunder. They would choose their time/place of battle such that this simply isn't an issue (early morning twilight, perhaps, or a civilized post-lunch melee).
Even attacking troops may want to avoid dawn, as any cavalry units or routed ground forces may also end up facing into the sun, running straight into their own comrades.
That aside:
- Some kind of muslin or thin material on the inside of helmets (for
full helms) or as a veil on the outside (for half helms) may suffice.
These might not cope in the wind or the heat of battle though. - Helmets with very wide brims (might work as long as you don't have to look uphill)
- Eye shadow to reduce reflected glare
- Portable sun shades - either on a per-solider basis, or perhaps a few large shades held by specialist units in the army (like a
standard-bearer) - There would be a strong military incentive to invent some kind of dark glasses, so a rudimentary form of coloured or tinted glass may
be employed, either as part of a visor or as spectacles. Small, simple cuts of glass would likely not be that expensive to manufacture.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This is the right answer. People that susceptible to sun-blindness would have that as a major consideration in where and how the places they'd be defending would be built. There just wouldn't BE open fields to the east and west. ALSO: With regard to the veils and eye shadow, techniques like that have been used in Africa and the Middle east for a couple thousand years at least.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 15:00
3
$begingroup$
Helmets with horizontal slits in the visors would be very helpful, as well as being good armour. A little brim over the slits would help further.
$endgroup$
– Chris H
May 13 at 15:57
$begingroup$
Snow goggles have been in use by polar peoples for ages and would work in this situations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_goggles
$endgroup$
– Borgh
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Give them a taste of their own medicine!
Of course it is not the most proper answer to the OP, but it could be an interesting countermeasure.
Attacked soldiers have a mirror (or a patch of very shiny metal) embedded on their helm, just above the forebrow and/or in their shield.
By adequately shaping the mirror, it would reflect the light from the low sun toward the enemies, effectively blinding them.
- The mirror would create a bright spot in front of the soldier: if
they keep the lines, the enemy would run against a blinding line of
light. This tactic would of course be less effective if the defending
soldiers had to run against the enemy or it they can't hold the lines
(for instance if the enemy attacks covered by a rain of arrows). - For a surprise effect, the soldiers could receive the instruction to
cover the mirrors with a blanket and uncover it only when the enemy
is charging against them.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that this would not necessarily be limited to the first and last hours of the day. Using mirrors, it would be possible to use this tactic at most times when the sun is shining.
$endgroup$
– Makyen
May 13 at 22:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a technological solution, a brimmed helmet such as a morion could be tilted to block the sun while still allowing good visibility of your opponents.
However, if you're caught off guard and forced to come up with a tactical solution to this problem, you could split and roll the line. Let the enemy push through the middle of your formation as you try to hold the flanks. This will put you at a slight disadvantage because it would mean if one side of your army starts to fall, it could not be reinforced from the other side, but it would get the sun out of your eyes eliminating what is probably the greater threat. Plus, if your attacker is in fact is the smaller force, this maneuver could be the precursor to completely surrounding them which would maximize the use of your superior numbers.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Avoid having open, level ground to the east at dawn
As long as the terrain immediately to your east either blocks the light or impedes your enemy, you're fine.
If you're immediately west of something tall and opaque -- woods, a ridge, a town wall -- it will block the sun until it's higher in the sky. (It may or may not also slow down the enemy.) If your enemy is on top of it, you'll be looking up at them and not at the sun, though you may have a related problem an hour later.
If you're immediately west of a valley, you'll be looking down into it, not into the sun. (And your attackers will be slowed by climbing.)
If you're immediately west of impassible terrain -- water, swamp, thick brush -- then your enemy won't attack that way.
Note that sunglass and substitutes do NOT solve the problem. They prevent eye strain, but they block out the light you need to see as well as the sunlight, so they don't help you see your attackers very much.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dig a Trench
The vulnerable area is actually quite small, therefore a 6' deep trench would stop any charge from the vulnerable direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's some thoughts
Something similar to the Roman marching fort could be useful tactically, simply as a delaying method that puts confrontation off until the sun is well up in the sky. This leaves the defender vulnerable to fast moving auxiliaries when they try to deploy.
A simple cloth veil that cuts the sun light down to manageable levels could be put around/over helmets. This reduces the vision of troops and in a melee it can come loose etc...
Slit/barred helmets, full face helms with narrow vision slits are often compared to having your head in a bucket, for good reason in my experience. The amount of light that gets in through the visor is extremely limited, such helms need not be made in metal either, a leather helm can be made in the same design. Again there are issues with what one can see when looking out of such a helm.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first hour, the sun is pretty close to the horizon, so if you can block the light just a few yards off the ground in front of you, then you'll be in good shape, right? Also, the place where the sunrise is most dangerous is in an open plain, and I assume you don't have enough time to plant a bunch of tall bushes and trees around your defenses. So you'll likely have some advance notice that enemies are coming near, even if it comes by means of scouts that are set off to the side of the approach area so that they don't get blinded.
Block out the Sun with Smoke
Suppose your east-facing defense has a bunch of catapults geared and ready to pummel the ground 10-50 yards in front of your battle line with powder/smoke bombs, creating a dense smokescreen that would both protect you from the light, and also give you the opportunity to quickly rearrange your troops in preparation for the attack.
The downside is that if you do this more than once, the enemy might expect it. In that case, since neither you nor your enemy can really see one another, and neither of you have been thrown into confusion, the worst case scenario is that you're on level footing with your enemy. In any case, it's easy to imagine generating a very large smokescreen with enough materials, and so this gets the sun out of the picture.
Types of Smoke
Expanding on this idea, you can choose from any number of powders to maximize the effect. You could mix an irritant like cayenne powder with fine flour or cinnamon, which can be caused to explode when enough of it is suspended in the air. You could even follow up with burning wood soaked in onion juice -- it'll produce a lot of smoke, and it would be quite uncomfortable to wade through.
In the worst case scenario, you're downwind of the battlefield. If that happens, or if your enemies are wise to your delicious half-baked smokescreen and try to counter it with water or something, then you can always fall back on regular medieval smoke bombs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 even with the downside - "neither you nor your enemy can really see one another" - that is at least better than only the enemy being able to see the defenders.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Faulty premise - it gives no advantage
I can only assume the OP has never been awake at dawn. The sunlight is not ever "blinding".
Sunlight as a distraction is useful only in the very small area covered by the sun. Soldiers looking forwards are by definition not looking into the sun, because they're looking towards their opponents and not up into the sky. One possible exception would be if the enemy are landing on a beach, in which case the horizon is lower and glare off the water could be an issue, but otherwise it really doesn't matter.
Of course targeted arrow firing would be affected, since archers do look up. But no army fired arrows at specific targets, unless the targets were very close - they fired en masse, with the target being "put that arrow 200 yards away". Distance mattered, not accuracy, when you're aiming at troops in formation.
When it comes to hand-to-hand fighting, it might be a slight distraction, but barely even that. If you're fighting, you're focused on the opponent. Slight flashes from a rising sun will have no effect. I'm not aware of any historical land battle in which the angle relative to the sun had any effect due to brightness, although of course I'd be happy to be corrected.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
We're told that for the purposes of this question, it IS blinding. "The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience"
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
May 14 at 3:16
1
$begingroup$
@BenVoigt Then his "fantasy humanoids" would be unable to function in normal daylight. Except he also says they have no night vision either, which has to make us question what kind of sight they do have. Worldbuilding of course doesn't have to involve humans or Earth-type environments, but it does have to make some kind of sense. And if we need to assume something extremely implausible, then there must be extra conditions (e.g. "they all have a light-sensitive autistic syndrome") which would invalidate our answers - or perhaps lead to better answers. Either way, "faulty premise" applies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 7:59
1
$begingroup$
@Graham There is a reason cars have sun visors. Just this morning I had to use it as the sun is already quite strong even when low over the horizon. It is difficult and straining to the eyes to see the traffic without the visor.
$endgroup$
– Dubu
May 14 at 8:28
2
$begingroup$
We're not told why it's so bad for them, just that it is. So I think it's OK just to accept the premise of the question at face value.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:34
1
$begingroup$
@colmde Other people can if they want, sure. My own feeling is that I wouldn't accept the premise at face value in a novel, so I can't do the same here. The OP may then want to consider whether he's writing something which will bear reading. It looks like he's trying to justify a small force beating a bigger force, but isn't prepared to look at more realistic military scenarios which genuinely would be believable.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 11:31
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Crystal translucency
Quartz is an extremely abundant material, and some forms of quartz crystals are translucent. Perhaps they could be fashioned into a thin strip and attached a helmet visor, or tied in front of one's eyes with a leather strap. With the strong backlight of the sun, enemies would have quite dark shadows and their fuzzy outlines might be enough to attack or dodge.
Helmet shadow bar
One way that might reduce the enemy's advantage somewhat is to attach a horizontal bar or strip in front of the soldier's forehead that can be lined up with the sun by tilting one's head. It might take some skill to use but the soldier would be able to turn their eyes left, right, above or below, and to some degree rotate their head.
(The bar cannot be vertical because its shadow could only cover one eye at a time.)
When it is hard to maintain head tilt, for instance when dodging something or dashing forwards, the soldier could look at the ground or close their eyes. With your eyes closed it is possible (with some skill) to tell when the bar is in the right place and open your eyes again.
It is clearly not a great solution, but I think it would be better than nothing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you have middle-ages technology, your humans likely have cheesecloth or burlap. Simply wrapping this around their eyes in a thin layer would allow them to see, but still block out the sun. Halloween costumes do this when they want to hide the wearer's eyes, with the added effect of acting as light-blockers. Since you don't need that much visibility up-close (it actually becomes a hassle in real fights), this is good for front-lines soldiers, with the added bonus of acting as a sweatband and preventing sweat from stinging their eyes.
Adding on to @Artelius's answer, instead or the normal white crystal quartz, you could use Smoky Quartz to form a kind of sunglasses. These are better for commanders and archers, which depend on fine vision control for their duties, which also supports these positions being rarer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
lazarusL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146911%2fhow-to-not-get-blinded-by-an-attack-at-dawn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You don't need high tech, or even glass, for light-reduction "glasses".
In real life, there are places where bright light is a problem - in snowfields in the north. People find ways to cope.
(Picture from a webpage about Inuits)
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
At first this seems like a good answer, because they're light-reduction glasses, right? But they only reduce the total amount of light entering the eyes, they don't change the intensity of the light that goes in through the slits. Works well when the problem is that all the snow all around you is reflecting the sunlight, but doesn't help at all with looking towards the sun. Also restricts your peripheral vision.
$endgroup$
– Jared K
May 13 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
+1 for simple answer But the picture is a bit misleading for OP's purpose. A slit would be a bad choice because it limits you vision to much but the same concept but only with a lot of small holes would do the trick just fine.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
May 14 at 7:40
2
$begingroup$
There is something I saw used in the movie Himalaya. They use an animal's hair (probably yak) that is black and just put it in front of their eyes. It's loose enough to let some light through, like an extra layer of eye lashes if you want.
$endgroup$
– Guimoute
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@JaredK - Wrong on both counts. As long as the vertical slit width is less than the diameter of the iris, peak intensity will be reduced. Likewise, for the illustrated "glasses", the long horizontal extent will proved excellent horizontal peripheral vision. Vertical extent is limited, but this is not likely a problem for the situation described.
$endgroup$
– WhatRoughBeast
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You don't need high tech, or even glass, for light-reduction "glasses".
In real life, there are places where bright light is a problem - in snowfields in the north. People find ways to cope.
(Picture from a webpage about Inuits)
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
At first this seems like a good answer, because they're light-reduction glasses, right? But they only reduce the total amount of light entering the eyes, they don't change the intensity of the light that goes in through the slits. Works well when the problem is that all the snow all around you is reflecting the sunlight, but doesn't help at all with looking towards the sun. Also restricts your peripheral vision.
$endgroup$
– Jared K
May 13 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
+1 for simple answer But the picture is a bit misleading for OP's purpose. A slit would be a bad choice because it limits you vision to much but the same concept but only with a lot of small holes would do the trick just fine.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
May 14 at 7:40
2
$begingroup$
There is something I saw used in the movie Himalaya. They use an animal's hair (probably yak) that is black and just put it in front of their eyes. It's loose enough to let some light through, like an extra layer of eye lashes if you want.
$endgroup$
– Guimoute
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@JaredK - Wrong on both counts. As long as the vertical slit width is less than the diameter of the iris, peak intensity will be reduced. Likewise, for the illustrated "glasses", the long horizontal extent will proved excellent horizontal peripheral vision. Vertical extent is limited, but this is not likely a problem for the situation described.
$endgroup$
– WhatRoughBeast
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You don't need high tech, or even glass, for light-reduction "glasses".
In real life, there are places where bright light is a problem - in snowfields in the north. People find ways to cope.
(Picture from a webpage about Inuits)
$endgroup$
You don't need high tech, or even glass, for light-reduction "glasses".
In real life, there are places where bright light is a problem - in snowfields in the north. People find ways to cope.
(Picture from a webpage about Inuits)
answered May 13 at 16:36
JedediahJedediah
4,031717
4,031717
8
$begingroup$
At first this seems like a good answer, because they're light-reduction glasses, right? But they only reduce the total amount of light entering the eyes, they don't change the intensity of the light that goes in through the slits. Works well when the problem is that all the snow all around you is reflecting the sunlight, but doesn't help at all with looking towards the sun. Also restricts your peripheral vision.
$endgroup$
– Jared K
May 13 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
+1 for simple answer But the picture is a bit misleading for OP's purpose. A slit would be a bad choice because it limits you vision to much but the same concept but only with a lot of small holes would do the trick just fine.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
May 14 at 7:40
2
$begingroup$
There is something I saw used in the movie Himalaya. They use an animal's hair (probably yak) that is black and just put it in front of their eyes. It's loose enough to let some light through, like an extra layer of eye lashes if you want.
$endgroup$
– Guimoute
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@JaredK - Wrong on both counts. As long as the vertical slit width is less than the diameter of the iris, peak intensity will be reduced. Likewise, for the illustrated "glasses", the long horizontal extent will proved excellent horizontal peripheral vision. Vertical extent is limited, but this is not likely a problem for the situation described.
$endgroup$
– WhatRoughBeast
2 days ago
add a comment |
8
$begingroup$
At first this seems like a good answer, because they're light-reduction glasses, right? But they only reduce the total amount of light entering the eyes, they don't change the intensity of the light that goes in through the slits. Works well when the problem is that all the snow all around you is reflecting the sunlight, but doesn't help at all with looking towards the sun. Also restricts your peripheral vision.
$endgroup$
– Jared K
May 13 at 22:16
2
$begingroup$
+1 for simple answer But the picture is a bit misleading for OP's purpose. A slit would be a bad choice because it limits you vision to much but the same concept but only with a lot of small holes would do the trick just fine.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
May 14 at 7:40
2
$begingroup$
There is something I saw used in the movie Himalaya. They use an animal's hair (probably yak) that is black and just put it in front of their eyes. It's loose enough to let some light through, like an extra layer of eye lashes if you want.
$endgroup$
– Guimoute
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@JaredK - Wrong on both counts. As long as the vertical slit width is less than the diameter of the iris, peak intensity will be reduced. Likewise, for the illustrated "glasses", the long horizontal extent will proved excellent horizontal peripheral vision. Vertical extent is limited, but this is not likely a problem for the situation described.
$endgroup$
– WhatRoughBeast
2 days ago
8
8
$begingroup$
At first this seems like a good answer, because they're light-reduction glasses, right? But they only reduce the total amount of light entering the eyes, they don't change the intensity of the light that goes in through the slits. Works well when the problem is that all the snow all around you is reflecting the sunlight, but doesn't help at all with looking towards the sun. Also restricts your peripheral vision.
$endgroup$
– Jared K
May 13 at 22:16
$begingroup$
At first this seems like a good answer, because they're light-reduction glasses, right? But they only reduce the total amount of light entering the eyes, they don't change the intensity of the light that goes in through the slits. Works well when the problem is that all the snow all around you is reflecting the sunlight, but doesn't help at all with looking towards the sun. Also restricts your peripheral vision.
$endgroup$
– Jared K
May 13 at 22:16
2
2
$begingroup$
+1 for simple answer But the picture is a bit misleading for OP's purpose. A slit would be a bad choice because it limits you vision to much but the same concept but only with a lot of small holes would do the trick just fine.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
May 14 at 7:40
$begingroup$
+1 for simple answer But the picture is a bit misleading for OP's purpose. A slit would be a bad choice because it limits you vision to much but the same concept but only with a lot of small holes would do the trick just fine.
$endgroup$
– GittingGud
May 14 at 7:40
2
2
$begingroup$
There is something I saw used in the movie Himalaya. They use an animal's hair (probably yak) that is black and just put it in front of their eyes. It's loose enough to let some light through, like an extra layer of eye lashes if you want.
$endgroup$
– Guimoute
2 days ago
$begingroup$
There is something I saw used in the movie Himalaya. They use an animal's hair (probably yak) that is black and just put it in front of their eyes. It's loose enough to let some light through, like an extra layer of eye lashes if you want.
$endgroup$
– Guimoute
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@JaredK - Wrong on both counts. As long as the vertical slit width is less than the diameter of the iris, peak intensity will be reduced. Likewise, for the illustrated "glasses", the long horizontal extent will proved excellent horizontal peripheral vision. Vertical extent is limited, but this is not likely a problem for the situation described.
$endgroup$
– WhatRoughBeast
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@JaredK - Wrong on both counts. As long as the vertical slit width is less than the diameter of the iris, peak intensity will be reduced. Likewise, for the illustrated "glasses", the long horizontal extent will proved excellent horizontal peripheral vision. Vertical extent is limited, but this is not likely a problem for the situation described.
$endgroup$
– WhatRoughBeast
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I imagine that army tactics in this world would evolve such that commanders would not put their troops in that situation in the first place - i.e. if they are expecting an attack in the open field from the direction of the rising sun, they have already made a gross tactical blunder. They would choose their time/place of battle such that this simply isn't an issue (early morning twilight, perhaps, or a civilized post-lunch melee).
Even attacking troops may want to avoid dawn, as any cavalry units or routed ground forces may also end up facing into the sun, running straight into their own comrades.
That aside:
- Some kind of muslin or thin material on the inside of helmets (for
full helms) or as a veil on the outside (for half helms) may suffice.
These might not cope in the wind or the heat of battle though. - Helmets with very wide brims (might work as long as you don't have to look uphill)
- Eye shadow to reduce reflected glare
- Portable sun shades - either on a per-solider basis, or perhaps a few large shades held by specialist units in the army (like a
standard-bearer) - There would be a strong military incentive to invent some kind of dark glasses, so a rudimentary form of coloured or tinted glass may
be employed, either as part of a visor or as spectacles. Small, simple cuts of glass would likely not be that expensive to manufacture.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This is the right answer. People that susceptible to sun-blindness would have that as a major consideration in where and how the places they'd be defending would be built. There just wouldn't BE open fields to the east and west. ALSO: With regard to the veils and eye shadow, techniques like that have been used in Africa and the Middle east for a couple thousand years at least.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 15:00
3
$begingroup$
Helmets with horizontal slits in the visors would be very helpful, as well as being good armour. A little brim over the slits would help further.
$endgroup$
– Chris H
May 13 at 15:57
$begingroup$
Snow goggles have been in use by polar peoples for ages and would work in this situations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_goggles
$endgroup$
– Borgh
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I imagine that army tactics in this world would evolve such that commanders would not put their troops in that situation in the first place - i.e. if they are expecting an attack in the open field from the direction of the rising sun, they have already made a gross tactical blunder. They would choose their time/place of battle such that this simply isn't an issue (early morning twilight, perhaps, or a civilized post-lunch melee).
Even attacking troops may want to avoid dawn, as any cavalry units or routed ground forces may also end up facing into the sun, running straight into their own comrades.
That aside:
- Some kind of muslin or thin material on the inside of helmets (for
full helms) or as a veil on the outside (for half helms) may suffice.
These might not cope in the wind or the heat of battle though. - Helmets with very wide brims (might work as long as you don't have to look uphill)
- Eye shadow to reduce reflected glare
- Portable sun shades - either on a per-solider basis, or perhaps a few large shades held by specialist units in the army (like a
standard-bearer) - There would be a strong military incentive to invent some kind of dark glasses, so a rudimentary form of coloured or tinted glass may
be employed, either as part of a visor or as spectacles. Small, simple cuts of glass would likely not be that expensive to manufacture.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This is the right answer. People that susceptible to sun-blindness would have that as a major consideration in where and how the places they'd be defending would be built. There just wouldn't BE open fields to the east and west. ALSO: With regard to the veils and eye shadow, techniques like that have been used in Africa and the Middle east for a couple thousand years at least.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 15:00
3
$begingroup$
Helmets with horizontal slits in the visors would be very helpful, as well as being good armour. A little brim over the slits would help further.
$endgroup$
– Chris H
May 13 at 15:57
$begingroup$
Snow goggles have been in use by polar peoples for ages and would work in this situations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_goggles
$endgroup$
– Borgh
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I imagine that army tactics in this world would evolve such that commanders would not put their troops in that situation in the first place - i.e. if they are expecting an attack in the open field from the direction of the rising sun, they have already made a gross tactical blunder. They would choose their time/place of battle such that this simply isn't an issue (early morning twilight, perhaps, or a civilized post-lunch melee).
Even attacking troops may want to avoid dawn, as any cavalry units or routed ground forces may also end up facing into the sun, running straight into their own comrades.
That aside:
- Some kind of muslin or thin material on the inside of helmets (for
full helms) or as a veil on the outside (for half helms) may suffice.
These might not cope in the wind or the heat of battle though. - Helmets with very wide brims (might work as long as you don't have to look uphill)
- Eye shadow to reduce reflected glare
- Portable sun shades - either on a per-solider basis, or perhaps a few large shades held by specialist units in the army (like a
standard-bearer) - There would be a strong military incentive to invent some kind of dark glasses, so a rudimentary form of coloured or tinted glass may
be employed, either as part of a visor or as spectacles. Small, simple cuts of glass would likely not be that expensive to manufacture.
$endgroup$
I imagine that army tactics in this world would evolve such that commanders would not put their troops in that situation in the first place - i.e. if they are expecting an attack in the open field from the direction of the rising sun, they have already made a gross tactical blunder. They would choose their time/place of battle such that this simply isn't an issue (early morning twilight, perhaps, or a civilized post-lunch melee).
Even attacking troops may want to avoid dawn, as any cavalry units or routed ground forces may also end up facing into the sun, running straight into their own comrades.
That aside:
- Some kind of muslin or thin material on the inside of helmets (for
full helms) or as a veil on the outside (for half helms) may suffice.
These might not cope in the wind or the heat of battle though. - Helmets with very wide brims (might work as long as you don't have to look uphill)
- Eye shadow to reduce reflected glare
- Portable sun shades - either on a per-solider basis, or perhaps a few large shades held by specialist units in the army (like a
standard-bearer) - There would be a strong military incentive to invent some kind of dark glasses, so a rudimentary form of coloured or tinted glass may
be employed, either as part of a visor or as spectacles. Small, simple cuts of glass would likely not be that expensive to manufacture.
answered May 13 at 14:49
K. MorganK. Morgan
1,624411
1,624411
3
$begingroup$
This is the right answer. People that susceptible to sun-blindness would have that as a major consideration in where and how the places they'd be defending would be built. There just wouldn't BE open fields to the east and west. ALSO: With regard to the veils and eye shadow, techniques like that have been used in Africa and the Middle east for a couple thousand years at least.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 15:00
3
$begingroup$
Helmets with horizontal slits in the visors would be very helpful, as well as being good armour. A little brim over the slits would help further.
$endgroup$
– Chris H
May 13 at 15:57
$begingroup$
Snow goggles have been in use by polar peoples for ages and would work in this situations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_goggles
$endgroup$
– Borgh
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
This is the right answer. People that susceptible to sun-blindness would have that as a major consideration in where and how the places they'd be defending would be built. There just wouldn't BE open fields to the east and west. ALSO: With regard to the veils and eye shadow, techniques like that have been used in Africa and the Middle east for a couple thousand years at least.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 15:00
3
$begingroup$
Helmets with horizontal slits in the visors would be very helpful, as well as being good armour. A little brim over the slits would help further.
$endgroup$
– Chris H
May 13 at 15:57
$begingroup$
Snow goggles have been in use by polar peoples for ages and would work in this situations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_goggles
$endgroup$
– Borgh
2 days ago
3
3
$begingroup$
This is the right answer. People that susceptible to sun-blindness would have that as a major consideration in where and how the places they'd be defending would be built. There just wouldn't BE open fields to the east and west. ALSO: With regard to the veils and eye shadow, techniques like that have been used in Africa and the Middle east for a couple thousand years at least.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 15:00
$begingroup$
This is the right answer. People that susceptible to sun-blindness would have that as a major consideration in where and how the places they'd be defending would be built. There just wouldn't BE open fields to the east and west. ALSO: With regard to the veils and eye shadow, techniques like that have been used in Africa and the Middle east for a couple thousand years at least.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 15:00
3
3
$begingroup$
Helmets with horizontal slits in the visors would be very helpful, as well as being good armour. A little brim over the slits would help further.
$endgroup$
– Chris H
May 13 at 15:57
$begingroup$
Helmets with horizontal slits in the visors would be very helpful, as well as being good armour. A little brim over the slits would help further.
$endgroup$
– Chris H
May 13 at 15:57
$begingroup$
Snow goggles have been in use by polar peoples for ages and would work in this situations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_goggles
$endgroup$
– Borgh
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Snow goggles have been in use by polar peoples for ages and would work in this situations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_goggles
$endgroup$
– Borgh
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Give them a taste of their own medicine!
Of course it is not the most proper answer to the OP, but it could be an interesting countermeasure.
Attacked soldiers have a mirror (or a patch of very shiny metal) embedded on their helm, just above the forebrow and/or in their shield.
By adequately shaping the mirror, it would reflect the light from the low sun toward the enemies, effectively blinding them.
- The mirror would create a bright spot in front of the soldier: if
they keep the lines, the enemy would run against a blinding line of
light. This tactic would of course be less effective if the defending
soldiers had to run against the enemy or it they can't hold the lines
(for instance if the enemy attacks covered by a rain of arrows). - For a surprise effect, the soldiers could receive the instruction to
cover the mirrors with a blanket and uncover it only when the enemy
is charging against them.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that this would not necessarily be limited to the first and last hours of the day. Using mirrors, it would be possible to use this tactic at most times when the sun is shining.
$endgroup$
– Makyen
May 13 at 22:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Give them a taste of their own medicine!
Of course it is not the most proper answer to the OP, but it could be an interesting countermeasure.
Attacked soldiers have a mirror (or a patch of very shiny metal) embedded on their helm, just above the forebrow and/or in their shield.
By adequately shaping the mirror, it would reflect the light from the low sun toward the enemies, effectively blinding them.
- The mirror would create a bright spot in front of the soldier: if
they keep the lines, the enemy would run against a blinding line of
light. This tactic would of course be less effective if the defending
soldiers had to run against the enemy or it they can't hold the lines
(for instance if the enemy attacks covered by a rain of arrows). - For a surprise effect, the soldiers could receive the instruction to
cover the mirrors with a blanket and uncover it only when the enemy
is charging against them.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that this would not necessarily be limited to the first and last hours of the day. Using mirrors, it would be possible to use this tactic at most times when the sun is shining.
$endgroup$
– Makyen
May 13 at 22:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Give them a taste of their own medicine!
Of course it is not the most proper answer to the OP, but it could be an interesting countermeasure.
Attacked soldiers have a mirror (or a patch of very shiny metal) embedded on their helm, just above the forebrow and/or in their shield.
By adequately shaping the mirror, it would reflect the light from the low sun toward the enemies, effectively blinding them.
- The mirror would create a bright spot in front of the soldier: if
they keep the lines, the enemy would run against a blinding line of
light. This tactic would of course be less effective if the defending
soldiers had to run against the enemy or it they can't hold the lines
(for instance if the enemy attacks covered by a rain of arrows). - For a surprise effect, the soldiers could receive the instruction to
cover the mirrors with a blanket and uncover it only when the enemy
is charging against them.
$endgroup$
Give them a taste of their own medicine!
Of course it is not the most proper answer to the OP, but it could be an interesting countermeasure.
Attacked soldiers have a mirror (or a patch of very shiny metal) embedded on their helm, just above the forebrow and/or in their shield.
By adequately shaping the mirror, it would reflect the light from the low sun toward the enemies, effectively blinding them.
- The mirror would create a bright spot in front of the soldier: if
they keep the lines, the enemy would run against a blinding line of
light. This tactic would of course be less effective if the defending
soldiers had to run against the enemy or it they can't hold the lines
(for instance if the enemy attacks covered by a rain of arrows). - For a surprise effect, the soldiers could receive the instruction to
cover the mirrors with a blanket and uncover it only when the enemy
is charging against them.
answered May 13 at 16:19
McTroopersMcTroopers
2,09319
2,09319
1
$begingroup$
Note that this would not necessarily be limited to the first and last hours of the day. Using mirrors, it would be possible to use this tactic at most times when the sun is shining.
$endgroup$
– Makyen
May 13 at 22:21
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Note that this would not necessarily be limited to the first and last hours of the day. Using mirrors, it would be possible to use this tactic at most times when the sun is shining.
$endgroup$
– Makyen
May 13 at 22:21
1
1
$begingroup$
Note that this would not necessarily be limited to the first and last hours of the day. Using mirrors, it would be possible to use this tactic at most times when the sun is shining.
$endgroup$
– Makyen
May 13 at 22:21
$begingroup$
Note that this would not necessarily be limited to the first and last hours of the day. Using mirrors, it would be possible to use this tactic at most times when the sun is shining.
$endgroup$
– Makyen
May 13 at 22:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a technological solution, a brimmed helmet such as a morion could be tilted to block the sun while still allowing good visibility of your opponents.
However, if you're caught off guard and forced to come up with a tactical solution to this problem, you could split and roll the line. Let the enemy push through the middle of your formation as you try to hold the flanks. This will put you at a slight disadvantage because it would mean if one side of your army starts to fall, it could not be reinforced from the other side, but it would get the sun out of your eyes eliminating what is probably the greater threat. Plus, if your attacker is in fact is the smaller force, this maneuver could be the precursor to completely surrounding them which would maximize the use of your superior numbers.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a technological solution, a brimmed helmet such as a morion could be tilted to block the sun while still allowing good visibility of your opponents.
However, if you're caught off guard and forced to come up with a tactical solution to this problem, you could split and roll the line. Let the enemy push through the middle of your formation as you try to hold the flanks. This will put you at a slight disadvantage because it would mean if one side of your army starts to fall, it could not be reinforced from the other side, but it would get the sun out of your eyes eliminating what is probably the greater threat. Plus, if your attacker is in fact is the smaller force, this maneuver could be the precursor to completely surrounding them which would maximize the use of your superior numbers.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a technological solution, a brimmed helmet such as a morion could be tilted to block the sun while still allowing good visibility of your opponents.
However, if you're caught off guard and forced to come up with a tactical solution to this problem, you could split and roll the line. Let the enemy push through the middle of your formation as you try to hold the flanks. This will put you at a slight disadvantage because it would mean if one side of your army starts to fall, it could not be reinforced from the other side, but it would get the sun out of your eyes eliminating what is probably the greater threat. Plus, if your attacker is in fact is the smaller force, this maneuver could be the precursor to completely surrounding them which would maximize the use of your superior numbers.
$endgroup$
For a technological solution, a brimmed helmet such as a morion could be tilted to block the sun while still allowing good visibility of your opponents.
However, if you're caught off guard and forced to come up with a tactical solution to this problem, you could split and roll the line. Let the enemy push through the middle of your formation as you try to hold the flanks. This will put you at a slight disadvantage because it would mean if one side of your army starts to fall, it could not be reinforced from the other side, but it would get the sun out of your eyes eliminating what is probably the greater threat. Plus, if your attacker is in fact is the smaller force, this maneuver could be the precursor to completely surrounding them which would maximize the use of your superior numbers.
edited May 13 at 19:27
answered May 13 at 17:37
NosajimikiNosajimiki
4,6691333
4,6691333
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Avoid having open, level ground to the east at dawn
As long as the terrain immediately to your east either blocks the light or impedes your enemy, you're fine.
If you're immediately west of something tall and opaque -- woods, a ridge, a town wall -- it will block the sun until it's higher in the sky. (It may or may not also slow down the enemy.) If your enemy is on top of it, you'll be looking up at them and not at the sun, though you may have a related problem an hour later.
If you're immediately west of a valley, you'll be looking down into it, not into the sun. (And your attackers will be slowed by climbing.)
If you're immediately west of impassible terrain -- water, swamp, thick brush -- then your enemy won't attack that way.
Note that sunglass and substitutes do NOT solve the problem. They prevent eye strain, but they block out the light you need to see as well as the sunlight, so they don't help you see your attackers very much.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Avoid having open, level ground to the east at dawn
As long as the terrain immediately to your east either blocks the light or impedes your enemy, you're fine.
If you're immediately west of something tall and opaque -- woods, a ridge, a town wall -- it will block the sun until it's higher in the sky. (It may or may not also slow down the enemy.) If your enemy is on top of it, you'll be looking up at them and not at the sun, though you may have a related problem an hour later.
If you're immediately west of a valley, you'll be looking down into it, not into the sun. (And your attackers will be slowed by climbing.)
If you're immediately west of impassible terrain -- water, swamp, thick brush -- then your enemy won't attack that way.
Note that sunglass and substitutes do NOT solve the problem. They prevent eye strain, but they block out the light you need to see as well as the sunlight, so they don't help you see your attackers very much.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Avoid having open, level ground to the east at dawn
As long as the terrain immediately to your east either blocks the light or impedes your enemy, you're fine.
If you're immediately west of something tall and opaque -- woods, a ridge, a town wall -- it will block the sun until it's higher in the sky. (It may or may not also slow down the enemy.) If your enemy is on top of it, you'll be looking up at them and not at the sun, though you may have a related problem an hour later.
If you're immediately west of a valley, you'll be looking down into it, not into the sun. (And your attackers will be slowed by climbing.)
If you're immediately west of impassible terrain -- water, swamp, thick brush -- then your enemy won't attack that way.
Note that sunglass and substitutes do NOT solve the problem. They prevent eye strain, but they block out the light you need to see as well as the sunlight, so they don't help you see your attackers very much.
$endgroup$
Avoid having open, level ground to the east at dawn
As long as the terrain immediately to your east either blocks the light or impedes your enemy, you're fine.
If you're immediately west of something tall and opaque -- woods, a ridge, a town wall -- it will block the sun until it's higher in the sky. (It may or may not also slow down the enemy.) If your enemy is on top of it, you'll be looking up at them and not at the sun, though you may have a related problem an hour later.
If you're immediately west of a valley, you'll be looking down into it, not into the sun. (And your attackers will be slowed by climbing.)
If you're immediately west of impassible terrain -- water, swamp, thick brush -- then your enemy won't attack that way.
Note that sunglass and substitutes do NOT solve the problem. They prevent eye strain, but they block out the light you need to see as well as the sunlight, so they don't help you see your attackers very much.
answered May 14 at 2:51
DanDan
911
911
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dig a Trench
The vulnerable area is actually quite small, therefore a 6' deep trench would stop any charge from the vulnerable direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dig a Trench
The vulnerable area is actually quite small, therefore a 6' deep trench would stop any charge from the vulnerable direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dig a Trench
The vulnerable area is actually quite small, therefore a 6' deep trench would stop any charge from the vulnerable direction.
$endgroup$
Dig a Trench
The vulnerable area is actually quite small, therefore a 6' deep trench would stop any charge from the vulnerable direction.
answered May 13 at 14:45
MathaddictMathaddict
5,643736
5,643736
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's some thoughts
Something similar to the Roman marching fort could be useful tactically, simply as a delaying method that puts confrontation off until the sun is well up in the sky. This leaves the defender vulnerable to fast moving auxiliaries when they try to deploy.
A simple cloth veil that cuts the sun light down to manageable levels could be put around/over helmets. This reduces the vision of troops and in a melee it can come loose etc...
Slit/barred helmets, full face helms with narrow vision slits are often compared to having your head in a bucket, for good reason in my experience. The amount of light that gets in through the visor is extremely limited, such helms need not be made in metal either, a leather helm can be made in the same design. Again there are issues with what one can see when looking out of such a helm.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's some thoughts
Something similar to the Roman marching fort could be useful tactically, simply as a delaying method that puts confrontation off until the sun is well up in the sky. This leaves the defender vulnerable to fast moving auxiliaries when they try to deploy.
A simple cloth veil that cuts the sun light down to manageable levels could be put around/over helmets. This reduces the vision of troops and in a melee it can come loose etc...
Slit/barred helmets, full face helms with narrow vision slits are often compared to having your head in a bucket, for good reason in my experience. The amount of light that gets in through the visor is extremely limited, such helms need not be made in metal either, a leather helm can be made in the same design. Again there are issues with what one can see when looking out of such a helm.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's some thoughts
Something similar to the Roman marching fort could be useful tactically, simply as a delaying method that puts confrontation off until the sun is well up in the sky. This leaves the defender vulnerable to fast moving auxiliaries when they try to deploy.
A simple cloth veil that cuts the sun light down to manageable levels could be put around/over helmets. This reduces the vision of troops and in a melee it can come loose etc...
Slit/barred helmets, full face helms with narrow vision slits are often compared to having your head in a bucket, for good reason in my experience. The amount of light that gets in through the visor is extremely limited, such helms need not be made in metal either, a leather helm can be made in the same design. Again there are issues with what one can see when looking out of such a helm.
$endgroup$
Here's some thoughts
Something similar to the Roman marching fort could be useful tactically, simply as a delaying method that puts confrontation off until the sun is well up in the sky. This leaves the defender vulnerable to fast moving auxiliaries when they try to deploy.
A simple cloth veil that cuts the sun light down to manageable levels could be put around/over helmets. This reduces the vision of troops and in a melee it can come loose etc...
Slit/barred helmets, full face helms with narrow vision slits are often compared to having your head in a bucket, for good reason in my experience. The amount of light that gets in through the visor is extremely limited, such helms need not be made in metal either, a leather helm can be made in the same design. Again there are issues with what one can see when looking out of such a helm.
answered May 13 at 14:24
AshAsh
28.5k469157
28.5k469157
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first hour, the sun is pretty close to the horizon, so if you can block the light just a few yards off the ground in front of you, then you'll be in good shape, right? Also, the place where the sunrise is most dangerous is in an open plain, and I assume you don't have enough time to plant a bunch of tall bushes and trees around your defenses. So you'll likely have some advance notice that enemies are coming near, even if it comes by means of scouts that are set off to the side of the approach area so that they don't get blinded.
Block out the Sun with Smoke
Suppose your east-facing defense has a bunch of catapults geared and ready to pummel the ground 10-50 yards in front of your battle line with powder/smoke bombs, creating a dense smokescreen that would both protect you from the light, and also give you the opportunity to quickly rearrange your troops in preparation for the attack.
The downside is that if you do this more than once, the enemy might expect it. In that case, since neither you nor your enemy can really see one another, and neither of you have been thrown into confusion, the worst case scenario is that you're on level footing with your enemy. In any case, it's easy to imagine generating a very large smokescreen with enough materials, and so this gets the sun out of the picture.
Types of Smoke
Expanding on this idea, you can choose from any number of powders to maximize the effect. You could mix an irritant like cayenne powder with fine flour or cinnamon, which can be caused to explode when enough of it is suspended in the air. You could even follow up with burning wood soaked in onion juice -- it'll produce a lot of smoke, and it would be quite uncomfortable to wade through.
In the worst case scenario, you're downwind of the battlefield. If that happens, or if your enemies are wise to your delicious half-baked smokescreen and try to counter it with water or something, then you can always fall back on regular medieval smoke bombs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 even with the downside - "neither you nor your enemy can really see one another" - that is at least better than only the enemy being able to see the defenders.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first hour, the sun is pretty close to the horizon, so if you can block the light just a few yards off the ground in front of you, then you'll be in good shape, right? Also, the place where the sunrise is most dangerous is in an open plain, and I assume you don't have enough time to plant a bunch of tall bushes and trees around your defenses. So you'll likely have some advance notice that enemies are coming near, even if it comes by means of scouts that are set off to the side of the approach area so that they don't get blinded.
Block out the Sun with Smoke
Suppose your east-facing defense has a bunch of catapults geared and ready to pummel the ground 10-50 yards in front of your battle line with powder/smoke bombs, creating a dense smokescreen that would both protect you from the light, and also give you the opportunity to quickly rearrange your troops in preparation for the attack.
The downside is that if you do this more than once, the enemy might expect it. In that case, since neither you nor your enemy can really see one another, and neither of you have been thrown into confusion, the worst case scenario is that you're on level footing with your enemy. In any case, it's easy to imagine generating a very large smokescreen with enough materials, and so this gets the sun out of the picture.
Types of Smoke
Expanding on this idea, you can choose from any number of powders to maximize the effect. You could mix an irritant like cayenne powder with fine flour or cinnamon, which can be caused to explode when enough of it is suspended in the air. You could even follow up with burning wood soaked in onion juice -- it'll produce a lot of smoke, and it would be quite uncomfortable to wade through.
In the worst case scenario, you're downwind of the battlefield. If that happens, or if your enemies are wise to your delicious half-baked smokescreen and try to counter it with water or something, then you can always fall back on regular medieval smoke bombs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 even with the downside - "neither you nor your enemy can really see one another" - that is at least better than only the enemy being able to see the defenders.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first hour, the sun is pretty close to the horizon, so if you can block the light just a few yards off the ground in front of you, then you'll be in good shape, right? Also, the place where the sunrise is most dangerous is in an open plain, and I assume you don't have enough time to plant a bunch of tall bushes and trees around your defenses. So you'll likely have some advance notice that enemies are coming near, even if it comes by means of scouts that are set off to the side of the approach area so that they don't get blinded.
Block out the Sun with Smoke
Suppose your east-facing defense has a bunch of catapults geared and ready to pummel the ground 10-50 yards in front of your battle line with powder/smoke bombs, creating a dense smokescreen that would both protect you from the light, and also give you the opportunity to quickly rearrange your troops in preparation for the attack.
The downside is that if you do this more than once, the enemy might expect it. In that case, since neither you nor your enemy can really see one another, and neither of you have been thrown into confusion, the worst case scenario is that you're on level footing with your enemy. In any case, it's easy to imagine generating a very large smokescreen with enough materials, and so this gets the sun out of the picture.
Types of Smoke
Expanding on this idea, you can choose from any number of powders to maximize the effect. You could mix an irritant like cayenne powder with fine flour or cinnamon, which can be caused to explode when enough of it is suspended in the air. You could even follow up with burning wood soaked in onion juice -- it'll produce a lot of smoke, and it would be quite uncomfortable to wade through.
In the worst case scenario, you're downwind of the battlefield. If that happens, or if your enemies are wise to your delicious half-baked smokescreen and try to counter it with water or something, then you can always fall back on regular medieval smoke bombs.
$endgroup$
For the first hour, the sun is pretty close to the horizon, so if you can block the light just a few yards off the ground in front of you, then you'll be in good shape, right? Also, the place where the sunrise is most dangerous is in an open plain, and I assume you don't have enough time to plant a bunch of tall bushes and trees around your defenses. So you'll likely have some advance notice that enemies are coming near, even if it comes by means of scouts that are set off to the side of the approach area so that they don't get blinded.
Block out the Sun with Smoke
Suppose your east-facing defense has a bunch of catapults geared and ready to pummel the ground 10-50 yards in front of your battle line with powder/smoke bombs, creating a dense smokescreen that would both protect you from the light, and also give you the opportunity to quickly rearrange your troops in preparation for the attack.
The downside is that if you do this more than once, the enemy might expect it. In that case, since neither you nor your enemy can really see one another, and neither of you have been thrown into confusion, the worst case scenario is that you're on level footing with your enemy. In any case, it's easy to imagine generating a very large smokescreen with enough materials, and so this gets the sun out of the picture.
Types of Smoke
Expanding on this idea, you can choose from any number of powders to maximize the effect. You could mix an irritant like cayenne powder with fine flour or cinnamon, which can be caused to explode when enough of it is suspended in the air. You could even follow up with burning wood soaked in onion juice -- it'll produce a lot of smoke, and it would be quite uncomfortable to wade through.
In the worst case scenario, you're downwind of the battlefield. If that happens, or if your enemies are wise to your delicious half-baked smokescreen and try to counter it with water or something, then you can always fall back on regular medieval smoke bombs.
edited May 13 at 19:07
answered May 13 at 19:00
boxcartenantboxcartenant
2,501118
2,501118
$begingroup$
+1 even with the downside - "neither you nor your enemy can really see one another" - that is at least better than only the enemy being able to see the defenders.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
+1 even with the downside - "neither you nor your enemy can really see one another" - that is at least better than only the enemy being able to see the defenders.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:36
$begingroup$
+1 even with the downside - "neither you nor your enemy can really see one another" - that is at least better than only the enemy being able to see the defenders.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:36
$begingroup$
+1 even with the downside - "neither you nor your enemy can really see one another" - that is at least better than only the enemy being able to see the defenders.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Faulty premise - it gives no advantage
I can only assume the OP has never been awake at dawn. The sunlight is not ever "blinding".
Sunlight as a distraction is useful only in the very small area covered by the sun. Soldiers looking forwards are by definition not looking into the sun, because they're looking towards their opponents and not up into the sky. One possible exception would be if the enemy are landing on a beach, in which case the horizon is lower and glare off the water could be an issue, but otherwise it really doesn't matter.
Of course targeted arrow firing would be affected, since archers do look up. But no army fired arrows at specific targets, unless the targets were very close - they fired en masse, with the target being "put that arrow 200 yards away". Distance mattered, not accuracy, when you're aiming at troops in formation.
When it comes to hand-to-hand fighting, it might be a slight distraction, but barely even that. If you're fighting, you're focused on the opponent. Slight flashes from a rising sun will have no effect. I'm not aware of any historical land battle in which the angle relative to the sun had any effect due to brightness, although of course I'd be happy to be corrected.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
We're told that for the purposes of this question, it IS blinding. "The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience"
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
May 14 at 3:16
1
$begingroup$
@BenVoigt Then his "fantasy humanoids" would be unable to function in normal daylight. Except he also says they have no night vision either, which has to make us question what kind of sight they do have. Worldbuilding of course doesn't have to involve humans or Earth-type environments, but it does have to make some kind of sense. And if we need to assume something extremely implausible, then there must be extra conditions (e.g. "they all have a light-sensitive autistic syndrome") which would invalidate our answers - or perhaps lead to better answers. Either way, "faulty premise" applies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 7:59
1
$begingroup$
@Graham There is a reason cars have sun visors. Just this morning I had to use it as the sun is already quite strong even when low over the horizon. It is difficult and straining to the eyes to see the traffic without the visor.
$endgroup$
– Dubu
May 14 at 8:28
2
$begingroup$
We're not told why it's so bad for them, just that it is. So I think it's OK just to accept the premise of the question at face value.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:34
1
$begingroup$
@colmde Other people can if they want, sure. My own feeling is that I wouldn't accept the premise at face value in a novel, so I can't do the same here. The OP may then want to consider whether he's writing something which will bear reading. It looks like he's trying to justify a small force beating a bigger force, but isn't prepared to look at more realistic military scenarios which genuinely would be believable.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 11:31
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Faulty premise - it gives no advantage
I can only assume the OP has never been awake at dawn. The sunlight is not ever "blinding".
Sunlight as a distraction is useful only in the very small area covered by the sun. Soldiers looking forwards are by definition not looking into the sun, because they're looking towards their opponents and not up into the sky. One possible exception would be if the enemy are landing on a beach, in which case the horizon is lower and glare off the water could be an issue, but otherwise it really doesn't matter.
Of course targeted arrow firing would be affected, since archers do look up. But no army fired arrows at specific targets, unless the targets were very close - they fired en masse, with the target being "put that arrow 200 yards away". Distance mattered, not accuracy, when you're aiming at troops in formation.
When it comes to hand-to-hand fighting, it might be a slight distraction, but barely even that. If you're fighting, you're focused on the opponent. Slight flashes from a rising sun will have no effect. I'm not aware of any historical land battle in which the angle relative to the sun had any effect due to brightness, although of course I'd be happy to be corrected.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
We're told that for the purposes of this question, it IS blinding. "The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience"
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
May 14 at 3:16
1
$begingroup$
@BenVoigt Then his "fantasy humanoids" would be unable to function in normal daylight. Except he also says they have no night vision either, which has to make us question what kind of sight they do have. Worldbuilding of course doesn't have to involve humans or Earth-type environments, but it does have to make some kind of sense. And if we need to assume something extremely implausible, then there must be extra conditions (e.g. "they all have a light-sensitive autistic syndrome") which would invalidate our answers - or perhaps lead to better answers. Either way, "faulty premise" applies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 7:59
1
$begingroup$
@Graham There is a reason cars have sun visors. Just this morning I had to use it as the sun is already quite strong even when low over the horizon. It is difficult and straining to the eyes to see the traffic without the visor.
$endgroup$
– Dubu
May 14 at 8:28
2
$begingroup$
We're not told why it's so bad for them, just that it is. So I think it's OK just to accept the premise of the question at face value.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:34
1
$begingroup$
@colmde Other people can if they want, sure. My own feeling is that I wouldn't accept the premise at face value in a novel, so I can't do the same here. The OP may then want to consider whether he's writing something which will bear reading. It looks like he's trying to justify a small force beating a bigger force, but isn't prepared to look at more realistic military scenarios which genuinely would be believable.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 11:31
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Faulty premise - it gives no advantage
I can only assume the OP has never been awake at dawn. The sunlight is not ever "blinding".
Sunlight as a distraction is useful only in the very small area covered by the sun. Soldiers looking forwards are by definition not looking into the sun, because they're looking towards their opponents and not up into the sky. One possible exception would be if the enemy are landing on a beach, in which case the horizon is lower and glare off the water could be an issue, but otherwise it really doesn't matter.
Of course targeted arrow firing would be affected, since archers do look up. But no army fired arrows at specific targets, unless the targets were very close - they fired en masse, with the target being "put that arrow 200 yards away". Distance mattered, not accuracy, when you're aiming at troops in formation.
When it comes to hand-to-hand fighting, it might be a slight distraction, but barely even that. If you're fighting, you're focused on the opponent. Slight flashes from a rising sun will have no effect. I'm not aware of any historical land battle in which the angle relative to the sun had any effect due to brightness, although of course I'd be happy to be corrected.
$endgroup$
Faulty premise - it gives no advantage
I can only assume the OP has never been awake at dawn. The sunlight is not ever "blinding".
Sunlight as a distraction is useful only in the very small area covered by the sun. Soldiers looking forwards are by definition not looking into the sun, because they're looking towards their opponents and not up into the sky. One possible exception would be if the enemy are landing on a beach, in which case the horizon is lower and glare off the water could be an issue, but otherwise it really doesn't matter.
Of course targeted arrow firing would be affected, since archers do look up. But no army fired arrows at specific targets, unless the targets were very close - they fired en masse, with the target being "put that arrow 200 yards away". Distance mattered, not accuracy, when you're aiming at troops in formation.
When it comes to hand-to-hand fighting, it might be a slight distraction, but barely even that. If you're fighting, you're focused on the opponent. Slight flashes from a rising sun will have no effect. I'm not aware of any historical land battle in which the angle relative to the sun had any effect due to brightness, although of course I'd be happy to be corrected.
answered May 13 at 23:24
GrahamGraham
11.1k1257
11.1k1257
4
$begingroup$
We're told that for the purposes of this question, it IS blinding. "The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience"
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
May 14 at 3:16
1
$begingroup$
@BenVoigt Then his "fantasy humanoids" would be unable to function in normal daylight. Except he also says they have no night vision either, which has to make us question what kind of sight they do have. Worldbuilding of course doesn't have to involve humans or Earth-type environments, but it does have to make some kind of sense. And if we need to assume something extremely implausible, then there must be extra conditions (e.g. "they all have a light-sensitive autistic syndrome") which would invalidate our answers - or perhaps lead to better answers. Either way, "faulty premise" applies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 7:59
1
$begingroup$
@Graham There is a reason cars have sun visors. Just this morning I had to use it as the sun is already quite strong even when low over the horizon. It is difficult and straining to the eyes to see the traffic without the visor.
$endgroup$
– Dubu
May 14 at 8:28
2
$begingroup$
We're not told why it's so bad for them, just that it is. So I think it's OK just to accept the premise of the question at face value.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:34
1
$begingroup$
@colmde Other people can if they want, sure. My own feeling is that I wouldn't accept the premise at face value in a novel, so I can't do the same here. The OP may then want to consider whether he's writing something which will bear reading. It looks like he's trying to justify a small force beating a bigger force, but isn't prepared to look at more realistic military scenarios which genuinely would be believable.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 11:31
|
show 2 more comments
4
$begingroup$
We're told that for the purposes of this question, it IS blinding. "The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience"
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
May 14 at 3:16
1
$begingroup$
@BenVoigt Then his "fantasy humanoids" would be unable to function in normal daylight. Except he also says they have no night vision either, which has to make us question what kind of sight they do have. Worldbuilding of course doesn't have to involve humans or Earth-type environments, but it does have to make some kind of sense. And if we need to assume something extremely implausible, then there must be extra conditions (e.g. "they all have a light-sensitive autistic syndrome") which would invalidate our answers - or perhaps lead to better answers. Either way, "faulty premise" applies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 7:59
1
$begingroup$
@Graham There is a reason cars have sun visors. Just this morning I had to use it as the sun is already quite strong even when low over the horizon. It is difficult and straining to the eyes to see the traffic without the visor.
$endgroup$
– Dubu
May 14 at 8:28
2
$begingroup$
We're not told why it's so bad for them, just that it is. So I think it's OK just to accept the premise of the question at face value.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:34
1
$begingroup$
@colmde Other people can if they want, sure. My own feeling is that I wouldn't accept the premise at face value in a novel, so I can't do the same here. The OP may then want to consider whether he's writing something which will bear reading. It looks like he's trying to justify a small force beating a bigger force, but isn't prepared to look at more realistic military scenarios which genuinely would be believable.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 11:31
4
4
$begingroup$
We're told that for the purposes of this question, it IS blinding. "The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience"
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
May 14 at 3:16
$begingroup$
We're told that for the purposes of this question, it IS blinding. "The effect on my fantasy humanoids would be many orders of magnitude greater than anything humans experience"
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
May 14 at 3:16
1
1
$begingroup$
@BenVoigt Then his "fantasy humanoids" would be unable to function in normal daylight. Except he also says they have no night vision either, which has to make us question what kind of sight they do have. Worldbuilding of course doesn't have to involve humans or Earth-type environments, but it does have to make some kind of sense. And if we need to assume something extremely implausible, then there must be extra conditions (e.g. "they all have a light-sensitive autistic syndrome") which would invalidate our answers - or perhaps lead to better answers. Either way, "faulty premise" applies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 7:59
$begingroup$
@BenVoigt Then his "fantasy humanoids" would be unable to function in normal daylight. Except he also says they have no night vision either, which has to make us question what kind of sight they do have. Worldbuilding of course doesn't have to involve humans or Earth-type environments, but it does have to make some kind of sense. And if we need to assume something extremely implausible, then there must be extra conditions (e.g. "they all have a light-sensitive autistic syndrome") which would invalidate our answers - or perhaps lead to better answers. Either way, "faulty premise" applies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 7:59
1
1
$begingroup$
@Graham There is a reason cars have sun visors. Just this morning I had to use it as the sun is already quite strong even when low over the horizon. It is difficult and straining to the eyes to see the traffic without the visor.
$endgroup$
– Dubu
May 14 at 8:28
$begingroup$
@Graham There is a reason cars have sun visors. Just this morning I had to use it as the sun is already quite strong even when low over the horizon. It is difficult and straining to the eyes to see the traffic without the visor.
$endgroup$
– Dubu
May 14 at 8:28
2
2
$begingroup$
We're not told why it's so bad for them, just that it is. So I think it's OK just to accept the premise of the question at face value.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:34
$begingroup$
We're not told why it's so bad for them, just that it is. So I think it's OK just to accept the premise of the question at face value.
$endgroup$
– colmde
May 14 at 8:34
1
1
$begingroup$
@colmde Other people can if they want, sure. My own feeling is that I wouldn't accept the premise at face value in a novel, so I can't do the same here. The OP may then want to consider whether he's writing something which will bear reading. It looks like he's trying to justify a small force beating a bigger force, but isn't prepared to look at more realistic military scenarios which genuinely would be believable.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 11:31
$begingroup$
@colmde Other people can if they want, sure. My own feeling is that I wouldn't accept the premise at face value in a novel, so I can't do the same here. The OP may then want to consider whether he's writing something which will bear reading. It looks like he's trying to justify a small force beating a bigger force, but isn't prepared to look at more realistic military scenarios which genuinely would be believable.
$endgroup$
– Graham
May 14 at 11:31
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Crystal translucency
Quartz is an extremely abundant material, and some forms of quartz crystals are translucent. Perhaps they could be fashioned into a thin strip and attached a helmet visor, or tied in front of one's eyes with a leather strap. With the strong backlight of the sun, enemies would have quite dark shadows and their fuzzy outlines might be enough to attack or dodge.
Helmet shadow bar
One way that might reduce the enemy's advantage somewhat is to attach a horizontal bar or strip in front of the soldier's forehead that can be lined up with the sun by tilting one's head. It might take some skill to use but the soldier would be able to turn their eyes left, right, above or below, and to some degree rotate their head.
(The bar cannot be vertical because its shadow could only cover one eye at a time.)
When it is hard to maintain head tilt, for instance when dodging something or dashing forwards, the soldier could look at the ground or close their eyes. With your eyes closed it is possible (with some skill) to tell when the bar is in the right place and open your eyes again.
It is clearly not a great solution, but I think it would be better than nothing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Crystal translucency
Quartz is an extremely abundant material, and some forms of quartz crystals are translucent. Perhaps they could be fashioned into a thin strip and attached a helmet visor, or tied in front of one's eyes with a leather strap. With the strong backlight of the sun, enemies would have quite dark shadows and their fuzzy outlines might be enough to attack or dodge.
Helmet shadow bar
One way that might reduce the enemy's advantage somewhat is to attach a horizontal bar or strip in front of the soldier's forehead that can be lined up with the sun by tilting one's head. It might take some skill to use but the soldier would be able to turn their eyes left, right, above or below, and to some degree rotate their head.
(The bar cannot be vertical because its shadow could only cover one eye at a time.)
When it is hard to maintain head tilt, for instance when dodging something or dashing forwards, the soldier could look at the ground or close their eyes. With your eyes closed it is possible (with some skill) to tell when the bar is in the right place and open your eyes again.
It is clearly not a great solution, but I think it would be better than nothing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Crystal translucency
Quartz is an extremely abundant material, and some forms of quartz crystals are translucent. Perhaps they could be fashioned into a thin strip and attached a helmet visor, or tied in front of one's eyes with a leather strap. With the strong backlight of the sun, enemies would have quite dark shadows and their fuzzy outlines might be enough to attack or dodge.
Helmet shadow bar
One way that might reduce the enemy's advantage somewhat is to attach a horizontal bar or strip in front of the soldier's forehead that can be lined up with the sun by tilting one's head. It might take some skill to use but the soldier would be able to turn their eyes left, right, above or below, and to some degree rotate their head.
(The bar cannot be vertical because its shadow could only cover one eye at a time.)
When it is hard to maintain head tilt, for instance when dodging something or dashing forwards, the soldier could look at the ground or close their eyes. With your eyes closed it is possible (with some skill) to tell when the bar is in the right place and open your eyes again.
It is clearly not a great solution, but I think it would be better than nothing.
$endgroup$
Crystal translucency
Quartz is an extremely abundant material, and some forms of quartz crystals are translucent. Perhaps they could be fashioned into a thin strip and attached a helmet visor, or tied in front of one's eyes with a leather strap. With the strong backlight of the sun, enemies would have quite dark shadows and their fuzzy outlines might be enough to attack or dodge.
Helmet shadow bar
One way that might reduce the enemy's advantage somewhat is to attach a horizontal bar or strip in front of the soldier's forehead that can be lined up with the sun by tilting one's head. It might take some skill to use but the soldier would be able to turn their eyes left, right, above or below, and to some degree rotate their head.
(The bar cannot be vertical because its shadow could only cover one eye at a time.)
When it is hard to maintain head tilt, for instance when dodging something or dashing forwards, the soldier could look at the ground or close their eyes. With your eyes closed it is possible (with some skill) to tell when the bar is in the right place and open your eyes again.
It is clearly not a great solution, but I think it would be better than nothing.
answered 2 days ago
ArteliusArtelius
97746
97746
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you have middle-ages technology, your humans likely have cheesecloth or burlap. Simply wrapping this around their eyes in a thin layer would allow them to see, but still block out the sun. Halloween costumes do this when they want to hide the wearer's eyes, with the added effect of acting as light-blockers. Since you don't need that much visibility up-close (it actually becomes a hassle in real fights), this is good for front-lines soldiers, with the added bonus of acting as a sweatband and preventing sweat from stinging their eyes.
Adding on to @Artelius's answer, instead or the normal white crystal quartz, you could use Smoky Quartz to form a kind of sunglasses. These are better for commanders and archers, which depend on fine vision control for their duties, which also supports these positions being rarer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you have middle-ages technology, your humans likely have cheesecloth or burlap. Simply wrapping this around their eyes in a thin layer would allow them to see, but still block out the sun. Halloween costumes do this when they want to hide the wearer's eyes, with the added effect of acting as light-blockers. Since you don't need that much visibility up-close (it actually becomes a hassle in real fights), this is good for front-lines soldiers, with the added bonus of acting as a sweatband and preventing sweat from stinging their eyes.
Adding on to @Artelius's answer, instead or the normal white crystal quartz, you could use Smoky Quartz to form a kind of sunglasses. These are better for commanders and archers, which depend on fine vision control for their duties, which also supports these positions being rarer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you have middle-ages technology, your humans likely have cheesecloth or burlap. Simply wrapping this around their eyes in a thin layer would allow them to see, but still block out the sun. Halloween costumes do this when they want to hide the wearer's eyes, with the added effect of acting as light-blockers. Since you don't need that much visibility up-close (it actually becomes a hassle in real fights), this is good for front-lines soldiers, with the added bonus of acting as a sweatband and preventing sweat from stinging their eyes.
Adding on to @Artelius's answer, instead or the normal white crystal quartz, you could use Smoky Quartz to form a kind of sunglasses. These are better for commanders and archers, which depend on fine vision control for their duties, which also supports these positions being rarer.
$endgroup$
Since you have middle-ages technology, your humans likely have cheesecloth or burlap. Simply wrapping this around their eyes in a thin layer would allow them to see, but still block out the sun. Halloween costumes do this when they want to hide the wearer's eyes, with the added effect of acting as light-blockers. Since you don't need that much visibility up-close (it actually becomes a hassle in real fights), this is good for front-lines soldiers, with the added bonus of acting as a sweatband and preventing sweat from stinging their eyes.
Adding on to @Artelius's answer, instead or the normal white crystal quartz, you could use Smoky Quartz to form a kind of sunglasses. These are better for commanders and archers, which depend on fine vision control for their duties, which also supports these positions being rarer.
answered 2 days ago
awsirkisawsirkis
1263
1263
add a comment |
add a comment |
lazarusL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
lazarusL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
lazarusL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
lazarusL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146911%2fhow-to-not-get-blinded-by-an-attack-at-dawn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
19
$begingroup$
"At the dawn of the third day, look East..."
$endgroup$
– Nyakouai
May 13 at 14:09
10
$begingroup$
Rather than avoid being blinded by the sun, could they not mitigate it by using reflective objects to dazzle the attackers who have the sun to their backs?
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:15
4
$begingroup$
Am I correctly understanding that the question is basically: "My fantasy race is extremely susceptible to sun-glare. What kind of defensive preparations would they use to minimize their vulnerability?"
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
May 13 at 14:16
3
$begingroup$
@Nyakouai I believe that's "Look to my coming, at first light, on the fifth day. At dawn, look to the East."
$endgroup$
– Ash
May 13 at 14:19
6
$begingroup$
@lazarusL They don't need to be mirrors as you know them today, they only need to be highly polished objects. Mirrors in various forms have been around for a long time.
$endgroup$
– suchafunkymonkey
May 13 at 14:25