Thesis' “Future Work” section – is it acceptable to omit personal involvement in a mentioned project?Include background to ideas for future work in related work chapter of master thesis?Which is better for PhD application: research-based BS thesis somewhat related to interests, or extra courses + standard thesis in area of interest?PhD Dissertation Introduction: What to call section on thesis structure/overview?Can my undergraduate research thesis be published in a scientific paper? If so, how should I go?Getting stuck in a rut while writing a thesisRecalling standard results in a master's thesis appendix for reader's convenience and/or self-containednessHow to continue doing researchInconsistent advice on PhD wordcountIs original research required for an undergraduate thesis?Does it look bad to have a PhD thesis unrelated to the rest of future research?

Help understanding this line - usage of くれる

Why are BJTs common in output stages of power amplifiers?

Extract the characters before last colon

Was the dragon prowess intentionally downplayed in S08E04?

Substring join or additional table, which is faster?

Why does the headset man not get on the tractor?

What information exactly does an instruction cache store?

Should generated documentation be stored in a Git repository?

How to cope with regret and shame about not fully utilizing opportunities during PhD?

Is there any way to adjust the damage type of the Eldritch Blast cantrip so that it does fire damage?

complicated arrows in flowcharts

Is 95% of what you read in the financial press “either wrong or irrelevant?”

is it correct to say "When it started to rain, I was in the open air."

Is there an academic word that means "to split hairs over"?

White foam around tubeless tires

How to continually let my readers know what time it is in my story, in an organic way?

Can multiple outlets be directly attached to a single breaker?

Why do the lights go out when someone enters the dining room on this ship?

Uh oh, the propeller fell off

What is this old US Air Force plane?

Unexpected Netflix account registered to my Gmail address - any way it could be a hack attempt?

"The van's really booking"

Do not cross the line!

Why does SSL Labs now consider CBC suites weak?



Thesis' “Future Work” section – is it acceptable to omit personal involvement in a mentioned project?


Include background to ideas for future work in related work chapter of master thesis?Which is better for PhD application: research-based BS thesis somewhat related to interests, or extra courses + standard thesis in area of interest?PhD Dissertation Introduction: What to call section on thesis structure/overview?Can my undergraduate research thesis be published in a scientific paper? If so, how should I go?Getting stuck in a rut while writing a thesisRecalling standard results in a master's thesis appendix for reader's convenience and/or self-containednessHow to continue doing researchInconsistent advice on PhD wordcountIs original research required for an undergraduate thesis?Does it look bad to have a PhD thesis unrelated to the rest of future research?













16















So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 19





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    May 8 at 13:00






  • 16





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    May 8 at 13:39






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    May 8 at 19:09











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    May 9 at 13:20







  • 2





    I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    May 9 at 17:03















16















So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 19





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    May 8 at 13:00






  • 16





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    May 8 at 13:39






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    May 8 at 19:09











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    May 9 at 13:20







  • 2





    I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    May 9 at 17:03













16












16








16


2






So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











So I've been doing my bachelor's thesis. Alongside my bachelor's thesis, I've been taking a course that trains students in working in teams for projects. Let's call this 'course X'. Coincidentally, the project that I'm working on in course X happens to be very similar to my thesis topic. So, in the Future Work section of my thesis, I wrote about the project that we're working on in course X. Except I didn't mention that I'm working on the project. Rather, I mentioned that this project is an example of something that can be worked on (since it has similarities with the concepts implemented in the thesis).



Now, I recently passed my thesis. However, my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course. And this is stressing me out. Soon, we will be writing a sort of report on our project. I'm worried that my examiner will find out about this project someday and accuse me of lying in the Future Work section, since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it? Should I be worried about this? Because I'm really worried about this. Should I tell my examiner or supervisor that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in course X?



And for the record, that's not the only thing I mentioned in the Future Work section. I mentioned other potential areas of research in that section, but these aren't bothering me as much. Am I overthinking this?







thesis






share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 9 at 20:51









Søren D. Ptæus

1052




1052






New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked May 8 at 12:33









Jim AlisonJim Alison

8713




8713




New contributor



Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Jim Alison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 19





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    May 8 at 13:00






  • 16





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    May 8 at 13:39






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    May 8 at 19:09











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    May 9 at 13:20







  • 2





    I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    May 9 at 17:03












  • 19





    Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

    – Buffy
    May 8 at 13:00






  • 16





    Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

    – Soltius
    May 8 at 13:39






  • 3





    I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

    – TEK
    May 8 at 19:09











  • "I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

    – smci
    May 9 at 13:20







  • 2





    I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

    – Mike
    May 9 at 17:03







19




19





Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

– Buffy
May 8 at 13:00





Agreeing with everyone here who says "yes". Relax.

– Buffy
May 8 at 13:00




16




16





Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

– Soltius
May 8 at 13:39





Mandatory phd comics : phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1997

– Soltius
May 8 at 13:39




3




3





I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

– TEK
May 8 at 19:09





I 'messed up' my future work section in my PhD thesis and my examiners just asked me to correct it. You are over thinking this massively :)

– TEK
May 8 at 19:09













"I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

– smci
May 9 at 13:20






"I might have messed up" is a statement not a question. But we can't now rephrase this as the question "Did I mess up when I...?" because you end with "Am I overthinking this?" and people are commenting "yes". (Also the body of your questions contains four different questions...)

– smci
May 9 at 13:20





2




2





I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

– Mike
May 9 at 17:03





I never understood that PhD comic because I always just assumed that everyone started out at the "Blah Blah Blah Done!" stage. Don't worry about it.

– Mike
May 9 at 17:03










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















70















Am I overthinking this?




Yes.




my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






share|improve this answer
































    30














    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






    share|improve this answer






























      12














      You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



      If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






      share|improve this answer























      • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

        – Jim Alison
        May 8 at 12:51






      • 5





        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

        – Johanna
        May 8 at 12:53


















      7














      You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
      So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "415"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130273%2fthesis-future-work-section-is-it-acceptable-to-omit-personal-involvement-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        70















        Am I overthinking this?




        Yes.




        my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




        Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




        I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




        A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



        It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




        we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




        You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






        share|improve this answer





























          70















          Am I overthinking this?




          Yes.




          my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




          Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




          I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




          A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



          It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




          we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




          You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






          share|improve this answer



























            70












            70








            70








            Am I overthinking this?




            Yes.




            my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




            Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




            I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




            A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



            It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




            we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




            You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.






            share|improve this answer
















            Am I overthinking this?




            Yes.




            my examiner is oblivious to the fact that the project that I mentioned in the Future Work section is something that I'm actually working on in a different course.




            Your examiner probably isn't oblivious: Many researchers discuss other works in their future work section, without mentioning that they are already working on them.




            I'm worried that my examiner will...accuse me of lying...since a project that I'm working on doesn't really count as 'Future Work'.....but does it?




            A project that you are working on is future work, in the sense that it hasn't appeared publicly yet.



            It can be useful to discuss future work without explicitly mentioning that work is already in progress, since such work may never be published, due to unforeseen circumstances, for instance.




            we will be writing a sort of report on our project.




            You can cite your bachelor's thesis in that report.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited May 8 at 15:36

























            answered May 8 at 12:41









            user2768user2768

            16.1k44063




            16.1k44063





















                30














                The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                share|improve this answer



























                  30














                  The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    30












                    30








                    30







                    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.






                    share|improve this answer













                    The usual understanding of future work is "possible extensions of the presented work". So what you are doing is in no way problematic, one could even argue that it is actually a good thing: you actually are investigating the further possibilities.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered May 8 at 12:43









                    cheersmatecheersmate

                    8871310




                    8871310





















                        12














                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer























                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          May 8 at 12:51






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          May 8 at 12:53















                        12














                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer























                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          May 8 at 12:51






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          May 8 at 12:53













                        12












                        12








                        12







                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.






                        share|improve this answer













                        You are really overthinking this. Take a deep breath, and don;t worry about it. Future works refers to which kind of directions new research can take, given what you have presented in the paper. This includes projects that you have already started as well as things no one has done before. If there is a finished project, then it should be mentioned as a part of the literature review, but it doesn't sound like you have a manuscript ready from your other project.



                        If you are really concerned, you can speak to your supervisor and see if there is an option to add some errata to the thesis. At my institution, small errors and updates are corrected/added to by a sheet of paper (or three) titled Errata which contains the corrected or new information from between the submission and the actual defense.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered May 8 at 12:41









                        JohannaJohanna

                        7,72622537




                        7,72622537












                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          May 8 at 12:51






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          May 8 at 12:53

















                        • Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                          – Jim Alison
                          May 8 at 12:51






                        • 5





                          @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                          – Johanna
                          May 8 at 12:53
















                        Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                        – Jim Alison
                        May 8 at 12:51





                        Another thing that bothers me is that by the time I submitted the final version of my thesis, my team has already completed just enough of the project so that it counts as a "minimum viable product" (MVP). From this perspective, would it mean that when I submitted the thesis, the project was already complete in a way? Also I'm not aware if my team has already written a report on the MVP (I was very preoccupied with my thesis). But assuming that the report on the project is complete, would this mean that I'm gonna get in trouble for writing about a project that has already been completed?

                        – Jim Alison
                        May 8 at 12:51




                        5




                        5





                        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                        – Johanna
                        May 8 at 12:53





                        @JimAlison No, you're not going to get in trouble. It's common to be working on some of the 'future works' problems, and sometimes the project is finished before the first project is properly reviewed. It's certainly not academic misconduct. If there is a report now, ask to add a sentence of errata to the thesis stating this.

                        – Johanna
                        May 8 at 12:53











                        7














                        You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                        So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          7














                          You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                          So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            7












                            7








                            7







                            You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                            So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.






                            share|improve this answer













                            You could even argue that this is rather the norm than the exception. Later on, you will finish your work on a paper, submit it to a journal or conference and wait for the reviews and editors decision (which often takes some months or even a year).
                            So when the reviewers read the paper, it is rather likely that you are already working on an extension of your work.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered May 8 at 15:39









                            FooBarFooBar

                            1995




                            1995




















                                Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Jim Alison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130273%2fthesis-future-work-section-is-it-acceptable-to-omit-personal-involvement-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                                Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?