4 Layer PCB stack upThe best stack-up possible with a four-layer PCB?Methods or any innovative ways to check the correct layer order independent of the customer given layer stack data4-Layer PCB USB Routing Questionprinter for mass-production of pcb masks4 layers PCB stack - (signal, signal, power, ground)Most cost effective 6 layer stack setup?Four layer board manufacturing questionEagle - 6 Layer Via pairing error + bga fanoutBest layer stack strategy for a 6 layer PCB with mostly SMD componentsA small PCB Stack Up for High Speed

Teaching a class likely meant to inflate the GPA of student athletes

What is the purpose of bonds within an investment portfolio?

Explain the ending of Black Mirror's "Smithereens"

Return a String containing only alphabets without spaces

How to hide rifle during medieval town entrance inspection?

Why Does Mama Coco Look Old After Going to the Other World?

Origin of "boor"

If I leave the US through an airport, do I have to return through the same airport?

Scientist couple raises alien baby

Ability To Change Root User Password (Vulnerability?)

Live action TV show where High school Kids go into the virtual world and have to clear levels

Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?

Is there a DSLR/mirorless camera with minimal options like a classic, simple SLR?

How can I end combat quickly when the outcome is inevitable?

How to safely destroy (a large quantity of) valid checks?

What is this airplane?

Are polynomials with the same roots identical?

The Frozen Wastes

Is it safe to change the harddrive power feature so that it never turns off?

What does 思ってやっている mean?

What is the color of artificial intelligence?

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letter

Reactive Programming

My boss want to get rid of me - what should I do?



4 Layer PCB stack up


The best stack-up possible with a four-layer PCB?Methods or any innovative ways to check the correct layer order independent of the customer given layer stack data4-Layer PCB USB Routing Questionprinter for mass-production of pcb masks4 layers PCB stack - (signal, signal, power, ground)Most cost effective 6 layer stack setup?Four layer board manufacturing questionEagle - 6 Layer Via pairing error + bga fanoutBest layer stack strategy for a 6 layer PCB with mostly SMD componentsA small PCB Stack Up for High Speed






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


I have designed a lot of 2 layer PCBs so far and am trying to slowly move to 4 layer versions.



One of the major challenges I'm currently facing in that aspect is the acceptable stack up of the layers of the PCB.



I'm currently using the following stack up as I am dealing with a high voltage application.



Could anyone tell me if the stack up I'm going with is accurate? I have attached a screenshot of my current settings in Eagle.



My concern is with the blind vias connecting layers 1-15 and 2-16. Would a pcb manufacturer be able to achieve these interconnects?



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor



Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would you need blind vias on a 4 layer board? The two inner layers are probably just going to be planes and not signal layers. How high voltage is high voltage and how complex are the high voltage traces that they would need to be routed over/under low voltage traces? I just section an entire part of the board for high voltage.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:01







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    DKNguyen, the voltages are in the order of 7.4 KV and around 3.3 KV at places, and the minimum clearance is somewhere around 10 mm or above. According to IPC 2221, having a buried trace in FR4 can help in increasing the insulation strength between traces and is much better than surface traces. The board form factor is very small and is the main reason why I am running into these issues.
    $endgroup$
    – Kartikeya Veeramraju
    Jun 2 at 5:17










  • $begingroup$
    Hmmm, kV is out of my expertise.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not aware of any limitations on connecting layers with buried vias but those are manufacturing details that some fabs might be able to do and others not, so you should talk to your PCB fab.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You might have warping trouble with the asymmetry. Talk to your fab. If cost is not a big issue, maybe just make it thicker.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Jun 2 at 17:49


















6












$begingroup$


I have designed a lot of 2 layer PCBs so far and am trying to slowly move to 4 layer versions.



One of the major challenges I'm currently facing in that aspect is the acceptable stack up of the layers of the PCB.



I'm currently using the following stack up as I am dealing with a high voltage application.



Could anyone tell me if the stack up I'm going with is accurate? I have attached a screenshot of my current settings in Eagle.



My concern is with the blind vias connecting layers 1-15 and 2-16. Would a pcb manufacturer be able to achieve these interconnects?



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor



Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would you need blind vias on a 4 layer board? The two inner layers are probably just going to be planes and not signal layers. How high voltage is high voltage and how complex are the high voltage traces that they would need to be routed over/under low voltage traces? I just section an entire part of the board for high voltage.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:01







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    DKNguyen, the voltages are in the order of 7.4 KV and around 3.3 KV at places, and the minimum clearance is somewhere around 10 mm or above. According to IPC 2221, having a buried trace in FR4 can help in increasing the insulation strength between traces and is much better than surface traces. The board form factor is very small and is the main reason why I am running into these issues.
    $endgroup$
    – Kartikeya Veeramraju
    Jun 2 at 5:17










  • $begingroup$
    Hmmm, kV is out of my expertise.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not aware of any limitations on connecting layers with buried vias but those are manufacturing details that some fabs might be able to do and others not, so you should talk to your PCB fab.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You might have warping trouble with the asymmetry. Talk to your fab. If cost is not a big issue, maybe just make it thicker.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Jun 2 at 17:49














6












6








6





$begingroup$


I have designed a lot of 2 layer PCBs so far and am trying to slowly move to 4 layer versions.



One of the major challenges I'm currently facing in that aspect is the acceptable stack up of the layers of the PCB.



I'm currently using the following stack up as I am dealing with a high voltage application.



Could anyone tell me if the stack up I'm going with is accurate? I have attached a screenshot of my current settings in Eagle.



My concern is with the blind vias connecting layers 1-15 and 2-16. Would a pcb manufacturer be able to achieve these interconnects?



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor



Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




I have designed a lot of 2 layer PCBs so far and am trying to slowly move to 4 layer versions.



One of the major challenges I'm currently facing in that aspect is the acceptable stack up of the layers of the PCB.



I'm currently using the following stack up as I am dealing with a high voltage application.



Could anyone tell me if the stack up I'm going with is accurate? I have attached a screenshot of my current settings in Eagle.



My concern is with the blind vias connecting layers 1-15 and 2-16. Would a pcb manufacturer be able to achieve these interconnects?



enter image description here







pcb stack-up






share|improve this question









New contributor



Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 2 at 14:21









JRE

26k64886




26k64886






New contributor



Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked Jun 2 at 4:54









Kartikeya VeeramrajuKartikeya Veeramraju

513




513




New contributor



Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would you need blind vias on a 4 layer board? The two inner layers are probably just going to be planes and not signal layers. How high voltage is high voltage and how complex are the high voltage traces that they would need to be routed over/under low voltage traces? I just section an entire part of the board for high voltage.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:01







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    DKNguyen, the voltages are in the order of 7.4 KV and around 3.3 KV at places, and the minimum clearance is somewhere around 10 mm or above. According to IPC 2221, having a buried trace in FR4 can help in increasing the insulation strength between traces and is much better than surface traces. The board form factor is very small and is the main reason why I am running into these issues.
    $endgroup$
    – Kartikeya Veeramraju
    Jun 2 at 5:17










  • $begingroup$
    Hmmm, kV is out of my expertise.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not aware of any limitations on connecting layers with buried vias but those are manufacturing details that some fabs might be able to do and others not, so you should talk to your PCB fab.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You might have warping trouble with the asymmetry. Talk to your fab. If cost is not a big issue, maybe just make it thicker.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Jun 2 at 17:49













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why would you need blind vias on a 4 layer board? The two inner layers are probably just going to be planes and not signal layers. How high voltage is high voltage and how complex are the high voltage traces that they would need to be routed over/under low voltage traces? I just section an entire part of the board for high voltage.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:01







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    DKNguyen, the voltages are in the order of 7.4 KV and around 3.3 KV at places, and the minimum clearance is somewhere around 10 mm or above. According to IPC 2221, having a buried trace in FR4 can help in increasing the insulation strength between traces and is much better than surface traces. The board form factor is very small and is the main reason why I am running into these issues.
    $endgroup$
    – Kartikeya Veeramraju
    Jun 2 at 5:17










  • $begingroup$
    Hmmm, kV is out of my expertise.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not aware of any limitations on connecting layers with buried vias but those are manufacturing details that some fabs might be able to do and others not, so you should talk to your PCB fab.
    $endgroup$
    – DKNguyen
    Jun 2 at 5:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You might have warping trouble with the asymmetry. Talk to your fab. If cost is not a big issue, maybe just make it thicker.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Jun 2 at 17:49








1




1




$begingroup$
Why would you need blind vias on a 4 layer board? The two inner layers are probably just going to be planes and not signal layers. How high voltage is high voltage and how complex are the high voltage traces that they would need to be routed over/under low voltage traces? I just section an entire part of the board for high voltage.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
Jun 2 at 5:01





$begingroup$
Why would you need blind vias on a 4 layer board? The two inner layers are probably just going to be planes and not signal layers. How high voltage is high voltage and how complex are the high voltage traces that they would need to be routed over/under low voltage traces? I just section an entire part of the board for high voltage.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
Jun 2 at 5:01





2




2




$begingroup$
DKNguyen, the voltages are in the order of 7.4 KV and around 3.3 KV at places, and the minimum clearance is somewhere around 10 mm or above. According to IPC 2221, having a buried trace in FR4 can help in increasing the insulation strength between traces and is much better than surface traces. The board form factor is very small and is the main reason why I am running into these issues.
$endgroup$
– Kartikeya Veeramraju
Jun 2 at 5:17




$begingroup$
DKNguyen, the voltages are in the order of 7.4 KV and around 3.3 KV at places, and the minimum clearance is somewhere around 10 mm or above. According to IPC 2221, having a buried trace in FR4 can help in increasing the insulation strength between traces and is much better than surface traces. The board form factor is very small and is the main reason why I am running into these issues.
$endgroup$
– Kartikeya Veeramraju
Jun 2 at 5:17












$begingroup$
Hmmm, kV is out of my expertise.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
Jun 2 at 5:20




$begingroup$
Hmmm, kV is out of my expertise.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
Jun 2 at 5:20




2




2




$begingroup$
I'm not aware of any limitations on connecting layers with buried vias but those are manufacturing details that some fabs might be able to do and others not, so you should talk to your PCB fab.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
Jun 2 at 5:26




$begingroup$
I'm not aware of any limitations on connecting layers with buried vias but those are manufacturing details that some fabs might be able to do and others not, so you should talk to your PCB fab.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
Jun 2 at 5:26




2




2




$begingroup$
You might have warping trouble with the asymmetry. Talk to your fab. If cost is not a big issue, maybe just make it thicker.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Jun 2 at 17:49





$begingroup$
You might have warping trouble with the asymmetry. Talk to your fab. If cost is not a big issue, maybe just make it thicker.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Jun 2 at 17:49











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

The problem is indeed with the crossing 1-15 and 2-16 vias. The manufacturer has to be physically able to make the board. There may be a way to attempt that construction, depending on the equipment the manufacturer has.



There are two straightforward ways to get close to what you have drawn.



1) 1-2 core, drill, thru plate. 15-16 core, drill, thru plate. Assemble, drill, thru plate. That gives 1-2, 15-16, 1-16, but not 1-15 or 2-16



2) 1-2 core, drill, plate. Prepreg 15 foil, drill, plate, prepreg 16 foil, drill, plate. That gives you 1-2, 1-15, 1-16, but not 2-16 or 15-16



More expensive, but I have used the process, micro-vias. It's mainly used for their small footprint, to get tracks between BGA balls.



3) As for (2) but with a final micro-via step which is laser drilling 15-16, power set to ablate the prepreg, but stop at the 15 foil. These vias would be very small and fragile, pads connected to them do not generally survive rework.



4) Speculative. The micro-via process only works because of the small thickness 15-16. It may be possible to micro-via from 16 through to 2, via an aperture etched in 15. Ask the manufacturer. They may have the capability. If you wave money at them, they may be able to develop the capability for you.



5) Speculative. You could replace the 2-16 via with 2-15 and 15-16 micro-vias, if the board vendor was happy to insert another micro-via step in the (3) buildup above.



It would be far better to think harder about your layout, and try to use the standard routes.



Do note that your board construction is unbalanced through the Z direction, this is strongly discouraged by most board vendors. It will probably warp after exposure to soldering heat, cracking your ceramic caps.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    Without agreeing that you should do this, it's possible to make all the connections you want using mechanically drilled blind vias. You might find you need to make the diameter of the deeper drills (like layer 1 to layer 15) fairly large to ensure good plating in the via. One vendor I just checked requires an aspect ratio less than 1.0, so you'd have a minimum diameter of about 1.7 mm for those vias (But check with your vendor for their requirements).



    You will certainly pay extra for all the additional drilling set-ups required.



    Another option that will probably reduce cost and improve the aspect ratio requirement, is controlled-depth back-drilling. In this process, you make a through via, plate it, then drill back to remove the plating from the part of the via you don't want connected.



    enter image description here



    (image source: multi-cb)



    You could then fill the hole with non-conductive epoxy to increase the isolation and prevent contamination getting into the path you're trying to isolate. Caveat: I do not work with high voltages, so if this is meant to provide safety isolation, check with your safety expert whether this process will be accepted as providing the isolation you need.



    Alos, asymmetric stack-ups are generally not preferred. Probably your vendor will want you to waive any requirements on board bend and twist.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Strongly second the comment on asymmetric stackup that bugger is going to warp. For this sort of thing you really need to be talking to your board house before you go too far, even if possible you can wind up adding a LOT of cost. You are well into the specialist assembly space where shopping the job to another manufacturer then the one whos advice you took will be 'difficult'.
      $endgroup$
      – Dan Mills
      Jun 2 at 15:09


















    2












    $begingroup$

    As others have mentioned, symmetry is very important with PCB stackup, so you should really aim for that. FR4 can withstand 20 kV/mm (according to Wikipedia, you probably want to verify this from the fab). You require 7.4 kV, so it should be more than enough if you make the thickness of 1-2 and 15-16 both 0.8 mm, which would result as a symmetric stackup.



    For vias I'd recommend buried via for 2-15 and blind for 1-2 and 15-16. You can then combine one blind and one buried via in the layout to make 1-15 and 2-16. Though buried via for 0.8 mm dielectric can be tricky.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      This is exactly what I was looking for! Also, could you suggest the settings I will have to change to, in order to enable the configuration you suggested? I am very new to the shorthand notation of Eagle.
      $endgroup$
      – Kartikeya Veeramraju
      Jun 2 at 20:57










    • $begingroup$
      I haven't used Eagle for a decade, so I can't help you with that.
      $endgroup$
      – TemeV
      Jun 3 at 4:11











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f441541%2f4-layer-pcb-stack-up%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9












    $begingroup$

    The problem is indeed with the crossing 1-15 and 2-16 vias. The manufacturer has to be physically able to make the board. There may be a way to attempt that construction, depending on the equipment the manufacturer has.



    There are two straightforward ways to get close to what you have drawn.



    1) 1-2 core, drill, thru plate. 15-16 core, drill, thru plate. Assemble, drill, thru plate. That gives 1-2, 15-16, 1-16, but not 1-15 or 2-16



    2) 1-2 core, drill, plate. Prepreg 15 foil, drill, plate, prepreg 16 foil, drill, plate. That gives you 1-2, 1-15, 1-16, but not 2-16 or 15-16



    More expensive, but I have used the process, micro-vias. It's mainly used for their small footprint, to get tracks between BGA balls.



    3) As for (2) but with a final micro-via step which is laser drilling 15-16, power set to ablate the prepreg, but stop at the 15 foil. These vias would be very small and fragile, pads connected to them do not generally survive rework.



    4) Speculative. The micro-via process only works because of the small thickness 15-16. It may be possible to micro-via from 16 through to 2, via an aperture etched in 15. Ask the manufacturer. They may have the capability. If you wave money at them, they may be able to develop the capability for you.



    5) Speculative. You could replace the 2-16 via with 2-15 and 15-16 micro-vias, if the board vendor was happy to insert another micro-via step in the (3) buildup above.



    It would be far better to think harder about your layout, and try to use the standard routes.



    Do note that your board construction is unbalanced through the Z direction, this is strongly discouraged by most board vendors. It will probably warp after exposure to soldering heat, cracking your ceramic caps.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      9












      $begingroup$

      The problem is indeed with the crossing 1-15 and 2-16 vias. The manufacturer has to be physically able to make the board. There may be a way to attempt that construction, depending on the equipment the manufacturer has.



      There are two straightforward ways to get close to what you have drawn.



      1) 1-2 core, drill, thru plate. 15-16 core, drill, thru plate. Assemble, drill, thru plate. That gives 1-2, 15-16, 1-16, but not 1-15 or 2-16



      2) 1-2 core, drill, plate. Prepreg 15 foil, drill, plate, prepreg 16 foil, drill, plate. That gives you 1-2, 1-15, 1-16, but not 2-16 or 15-16



      More expensive, but I have used the process, micro-vias. It's mainly used for their small footprint, to get tracks between BGA balls.



      3) As for (2) but with a final micro-via step which is laser drilling 15-16, power set to ablate the prepreg, but stop at the 15 foil. These vias would be very small and fragile, pads connected to them do not generally survive rework.



      4) Speculative. The micro-via process only works because of the small thickness 15-16. It may be possible to micro-via from 16 through to 2, via an aperture etched in 15. Ask the manufacturer. They may have the capability. If you wave money at them, they may be able to develop the capability for you.



      5) Speculative. You could replace the 2-16 via with 2-15 and 15-16 micro-vias, if the board vendor was happy to insert another micro-via step in the (3) buildup above.



      It would be far better to think harder about your layout, and try to use the standard routes.



      Do note that your board construction is unbalanced through the Z direction, this is strongly discouraged by most board vendors. It will probably warp after exposure to soldering heat, cracking your ceramic caps.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        9












        9








        9





        $begingroup$

        The problem is indeed with the crossing 1-15 and 2-16 vias. The manufacturer has to be physically able to make the board. There may be a way to attempt that construction, depending on the equipment the manufacturer has.



        There are two straightforward ways to get close to what you have drawn.



        1) 1-2 core, drill, thru plate. 15-16 core, drill, thru plate. Assemble, drill, thru plate. That gives 1-2, 15-16, 1-16, but not 1-15 or 2-16



        2) 1-2 core, drill, plate. Prepreg 15 foil, drill, plate, prepreg 16 foil, drill, plate. That gives you 1-2, 1-15, 1-16, but not 2-16 or 15-16



        More expensive, but I have used the process, micro-vias. It's mainly used for their small footprint, to get tracks between BGA balls.



        3) As for (2) but with a final micro-via step which is laser drilling 15-16, power set to ablate the prepreg, but stop at the 15 foil. These vias would be very small and fragile, pads connected to them do not generally survive rework.



        4) Speculative. The micro-via process only works because of the small thickness 15-16. It may be possible to micro-via from 16 through to 2, via an aperture etched in 15. Ask the manufacturer. They may have the capability. If you wave money at them, they may be able to develop the capability for you.



        5) Speculative. You could replace the 2-16 via with 2-15 and 15-16 micro-vias, if the board vendor was happy to insert another micro-via step in the (3) buildup above.



        It would be far better to think harder about your layout, and try to use the standard routes.



        Do note that your board construction is unbalanced through the Z direction, this is strongly discouraged by most board vendors. It will probably warp after exposure to soldering heat, cracking your ceramic caps.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The problem is indeed with the crossing 1-15 and 2-16 vias. The manufacturer has to be physically able to make the board. There may be a way to attempt that construction, depending on the equipment the manufacturer has.



        There are two straightforward ways to get close to what you have drawn.



        1) 1-2 core, drill, thru plate. 15-16 core, drill, thru plate. Assemble, drill, thru plate. That gives 1-2, 15-16, 1-16, but not 1-15 or 2-16



        2) 1-2 core, drill, plate. Prepreg 15 foil, drill, plate, prepreg 16 foil, drill, plate. That gives you 1-2, 1-15, 1-16, but not 2-16 or 15-16



        More expensive, but I have used the process, micro-vias. It's mainly used for their small footprint, to get tracks between BGA balls.



        3) As for (2) but with a final micro-via step which is laser drilling 15-16, power set to ablate the prepreg, but stop at the 15 foil. These vias would be very small and fragile, pads connected to them do not generally survive rework.



        4) Speculative. The micro-via process only works because of the small thickness 15-16. It may be possible to micro-via from 16 through to 2, via an aperture etched in 15. Ask the manufacturer. They may have the capability. If you wave money at them, they may be able to develop the capability for you.



        5) Speculative. You could replace the 2-16 via with 2-15 and 15-16 micro-vias, if the board vendor was happy to insert another micro-via step in the (3) buildup above.



        It would be far better to think harder about your layout, and try to use the standard routes.



        Do note that your board construction is unbalanced through the Z direction, this is strongly discouraged by most board vendors. It will probably warp after exposure to soldering heat, cracking your ceramic caps.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jun 2 at 15:00

























        answered Jun 2 at 5:59









        Neil_UKNeil_UK

        81.4k285188




        81.4k285188























            4












            $begingroup$

            Without agreeing that you should do this, it's possible to make all the connections you want using mechanically drilled blind vias. You might find you need to make the diameter of the deeper drills (like layer 1 to layer 15) fairly large to ensure good plating in the via. One vendor I just checked requires an aspect ratio less than 1.0, so you'd have a minimum diameter of about 1.7 mm for those vias (But check with your vendor for their requirements).



            You will certainly pay extra for all the additional drilling set-ups required.



            Another option that will probably reduce cost and improve the aspect ratio requirement, is controlled-depth back-drilling. In this process, you make a through via, plate it, then drill back to remove the plating from the part of the via you don't want connected.



            enter image description here



            (image source: multi-cb)



            You could then fill the hole with non-conductive epoxy to increase the isolation and prevent contamination getting into the path you're trying to isolate. Caveat: I do not work with high voltages, so if this is meant to provide safety isolation, check with your safety expert whether this process will be accepted as providing the isolation you need.



            Alos, asymmetric stack-ups are generally not preferred. Probably your vendor will want you to waive any requirements on board bend and twist.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Strongly second the comment on asymmetric stackup that bugger is going to warp. For this sort of thing you really need to be talking to your board house before you go too far, even if possible you can wind up adding a LOT of cost. You are well into the specialist assembly space where shopping the job to another manufacturer then the one whos advice you took will be 'difficult'.
              $endgroup$
              – Dan Mills
              Jun 2 at 15:09















            4












            $begingroup$

            Without agreeing that you should do this, it's possible to make all the connections you want using mechanically drilled blind vias. You might find you need to make the diameter of the deeper drills (like layer 1 to layer 15) fairly large to ensure good plating in the via. One vendor I just checked requires an aspect ratio less than 1.0, so you'd have a minimum diameter of about 1.7 mm for those vias (But check with your vendor for their requirements).



            You will certainly pay extra for all the additional drilling set-ups required.



            Another option that will probably reduce cost and improve the aspect ratio requirement, is controlled-depth back-drilling. In this process, you make a through via, plate it, then drill back to remove the plating from the part of the via you don't want connected.



            enter image description here



            (image source: multi-cb)



            You could then fill the hole with non-conductive epoxy to increase the isolation and prevent contamination getting into the path you're trying to isolate. Caveat: I do not work with high voltages, so if this is meant to provide safety isolation, check with your safety expert whether this process will be accepted as providing the isolation you need.



            Alos, asymmetric stack-ups are generally not preferred. Probably your vendor will want you to waive any requirements on board bend and twist.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Strongly second the comment on asymmetric stackup that bugger is going to warp. For this sort of thing you really need to be talking to your board house before you go too far, even if possible you can wind up adding a LOT of cost. You are well into the specialist assembly space where shopping the job to another manufacturer then the one whos advice you took will be 'difficult'.
              $endgroup$
              – Dan Mills
              Jun 2 at 15:09













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Without agreeing that you should do this, it's possible to make all the connections you want using mechanically drilled blind vias. You might find you need to make the diameter of the deeper drills (like layer 1 to layer 15) fairly large to ensure good plating in the via. One vendor I just checked requires an aspect ratio less than 1.0, so you'd have a minimum diameter of about 1.7 mm for those vias (But check with your vendor for their requirements).



            You will certainly pay extra for all the additional drilling set-ups required.



            Another option that will probably reduce cost and improve the aspect ratio requirement, is controlled-depth back-drilling. In this process, you make a through via, plate it, then drill back to remove the plating from the part of the via you don't want connected.



            enter image description here



            (image source: multi-cb)



            You could then fill the hole with non-conductive epoxy to increase the isolation and prevent contamination getting into the path you're trying to isolate. Caveat: I do not work with high voltages, so if this is meant to provide safety isolation, check with your safety expert whether this process will be accepted as providing the isolation you need.



            Alos, asymmetric stack-ups are generally not preferred. Probably your vendor will want you to waive any requirements on board bend and twist.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Without agreeing that you should do this, it's possible to make all the connections you want using mechanically drilled blind vias. You might find you need to make the diameter of the deeper drills (like layer 1 to layer 15) fairly large to ensure good plating in the via. One vendor I just checked requires an aspect ratio less than 1.0, so you'd have a minimum diameter of about 1.7 mm for those vias (But check with your vendor for their requirements).



            You will certainly pay extra for all the additional drilling set-ups required.



            Another option that will probably reduce cost and improve the aspect ratio requirement, is controlled-depth back-drilling. In this process, you make a through via, plate it, then drill back to remove the plating from the part of the via you don't want connected.



            enter image description here



            (image source: multi-cb)



            You could then fill the hole with non-conductive epoxy to increase the isolation and prevent contamination getting into the path you're trying to isolate. Caveat: I do not work with high voltages, so if this is meant to provide safety isolation, check with your safety expert whether this process will be accepted as providing the isolation you need.



            Alos, asymmetric stack-ups are generally not preferred. Probably your vendor will want you to waive any requirements on board bend and twist.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jun 2 at 14:15

























            answered Jun 2 at 6:00









            The PhotonThe Photon

            89.7k3105209




            89.7k3105209







            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Strongly second the comment on asymmetric stackup that bugger is going to warp. For this sort of thing you really need to be talking to your board house before you go too far, even if possible you can wind up adding a LOT of cost. You are well into the specialist assembly space where shopping the job to another manufacturer then the one whos advice you took will be 'difficult'.
              $endgroup$
              – Dan Mills
              Jun 2 at 15:09












            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Strongly second the comment on asymmetric stackup that bugger is going to warp. For this sort of thing you really need to be talking to your board house before you go too far, even if possible you can wind up adding a LOT of cost. You are well into the specialist assembly space where shopping the job to another manufacturer then the one whos advice you took will be 'difficult'.
              $endgroup$
              – Dan Mills
              Jun 2 at 15:09







            4




            4




            $begingroup$
            Strongly second the comment on asymmetric stackup that bugger is going to warp. For this sort of thing you really need to be talking to your board house before you go too far, even if possible you can wind up adding a LOT of cost. You are well into the specialist assembly space where shopping the job to another manufacturer then the one whos advice you took will be 'difficult'.
            $endgroup$
            – Dan Mills
            Jun 2 at 15:09




            $begingroup$
            Strongly second the comment on asymmetric stackup that bugger is going to warp. For this sort of thing you really need to be talking to your board house before you go too far, even if possible you can wind up adding a LOT of cost. You are well into the specialist assembly space where shopping the job to another manufacturer then the one whos advice you took will be 'difficult'.
            $endgroup$
            – Dan Mills
            Jun 2 at 15:09











            2












            $begingroup$

            As others have mentioned, symmetry is very important with PCB stackup, so you should really aim for that. FR4 can withstand 20 kV/mm (according to Wikipedia, you probably want to verify this from the fab). You require 7.4 kV, so it should be more than enough if you make the thickness of 1-2 and 15-16 both 0.8 mm, which would result as a symmetric stackup.



            For vias I'd recommend buried via for 2-15 and blind for 1-2 and 15-16. You can then combine one blind and one buried via in the layout to make 1-15 and 2-16. Though buried via for 0.8 mm dielectric can be tricky.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This is exactly what I was looking for! Also, could you suggest the settings I will have to change to, in order to enable the configuration you suggested? I am very new to the shorthand notation of Eagle.
              $endgroup$
              – Kartikeya Veeramraju
              Jun 2 at 20:57










            • $begingroup$
              I haven't used Eagle for a decade, so I can't help you with that.
              $endgroup$
              – TemeV
              Jun 3 at 4:11















            2












            $begingroup$

            As others have mentioned, symmetry is very important with PCB stackup, so you should really aim for that. FR4 can withstand 20 kV/mm (according to Wikipedia, you probably want to verify this from the fab). You require 7.4 kV, so it should be more than enough if you make the thickness of 1-2 and 15-16 both 0.8 mm, which would result as a symmetric stackup.



            For vias I'd recommend buried via for 2-15 and blind for 1-2 and 15-16. You can then combine one blind and one buried via in the layout to make 1-15 and 2-16. Though buried via for 0.8 mm dielectric can be tricky.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This is exactly what I was looking for! Also, could you suggest the settings I will have to change to, in order to enable the configuration you suggested? I am very new to the shorthand notation of Eagle.
              $endgroup$
              – Kartikeya Veeramraju
              Jun 2 at 20:57










            • $begingroup$
              I haven't used Eagle for a decade, so I can't help you with that.
              $endgroup$
              – TemeV
              Jun 3 at 4:11













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            As others have mentioned, symmetry is very important with PCB stackup, so you should really aim for that. FR4 can withstand 20 kV/mm (according to Wikipedia, you probably want to verify this from the fab). You require 7.4 kV, so it should be more than enough if you make the thickness of 1-2 and 15-16 both 0.8 mm, which would result as a symmetric stackup.



            For vias I'd recommend buried via for 2-15 and blind for 1-2 and 15-16. You can then combine one blind and one buried via in the layout to make 1-15 and 2-16. Though buried via for 0.8 mm dielectric can be tricky.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            As others have mentioned, symmetry is very important with PCB stackup, so you should really aim for that. FR4 can withstand 20 kV/mm (according to Wikipedia, you probably want to verify this from the fab). You require 7.4 kV, so it should be more than enough if you make the thickness of 1-2 and 15-16 both 0.8 mm, which would result as a symmetric stackup.



            For vias I'd recommend buried via for 2-15 and blind for 1-2 and 15-16. You can then combine one blind and one buried via in the layout to make 1-15 and 2-16. Though buried via for 0.8 mm dielectric can be tricky.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jun 2 at 17:21









            TemeVTemeV

            64018




            64018











            • $begingroup$
              This is exactly what I was looking for! Also, could you suggest the settings I will have to change to, in order to enable the configuration you suggested? I am very new to the shorthand notation of Eagle.
              $endgroup$
              – Kartikeya Veeramraju
              Jun 2 at 20:57










            • $begingroup$
              I haven't used Eagle for a decade, so I can't help you with that.
              $endgroup$
              – TemeV
              Jun 3 at 4:11
















            • $begingroup$
              This is exactly what I was looking for! Also, could you suggest the settings I will have to change to, in order to enable the configuration you suggested? I am very new to the shorthand notation of Eagle.
              $endgroup$
              – Kartikeya Veeramraju
              Jun 2 at 20:57










            • $begingroup$
              I haven't used Eagle for a decade, so I can't help you with that.
              $endgroup$
              – TemeV
              Jun 3 at 4:11















            $begingroup$
            This is exactly what I was looking for! Also, could you suggest the settings I will have to change to, in order to enable the configuration you suggested? I am very new to the shorthand notation of Eagle.
            $endgroup$
            – Kartikeya Veeramraju
            Jun 2 at 20:57




            $begingroup$
            This is exactly what I was looking for! Also, could you suggest the settings I will have to change to, in order to enable the configuration you suggested? I am very new to the shorthand notation of Eagle.
            $endgroup$
            – Kartikeya Veeramraju
            Jun 2 at 20:57












            $begingroup$
            I haven't used Eagle for a decade, so I can't help you with that.
            $endgroup$
            – TemeV
            Jun 3 at 4:11




            $begingroup$
            I haven't used Eagle for a decade, so I can't help you with that.
            $endgroup$
            – TemeV
            Jun 3 at 4:11










            Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Kartikeya Veeramraju is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f441541%2f4-layer-pcb-stack-up%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?