How to split an equation over two lines?aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizesplitting an equation inside curly brackets onto 2 lines without using BigError using split within an equationsplit equation in multiple linesList of equations, including equation contents and captionCan't generate png with Error: Erroneous nesting of equation structuresSplit matrix over two linesLatex beamer, Align equation within a tableHow continue a equation next lineHow can I align this equation in the center?

Copy group of files (Filename*) to backup (Filename*.bak)

"I am [the / an] owner of a bookstore"?

Is my guitar action too high or is the bridge too high?

How far can gerrymandering go?

How to count the number of bytes in a file, grouping the same bytes?

Is having 4 bed leveling adjustment points rather than 3 problematic?

Meaning of the word "good" in context

Does friction always oppose motion?

Is it theoretically possible to hack printer using scanner tray?

Russian equivalents of 能骗就骗 (if you can cheat, then cheat)

Correct use of the the idiom 'Гнать/Катить бочку'

Early 2000s movie about time travel, protagonist travels back to save girlfriend, then into multiple points in future

Why doesn't SpaceX land boosters in Africa?

Why should I allow multiple IPs on a website for a single session?

Is it advisable to inform the CEO about his brother accessing his office?

Is there a list of all of the cases in the Talmud where תיקו ("Teiku") is said?

Active wildlife outside the window- Good or Bad for Cat psychology?

Automorphisms and epimorphisms of finite groups

How useful would a hydroelectric power plant be in the post-apocalypse world?

What was the first science fiction or fantasy multiple choice book?

Where can I find my serialized Sitecore items?

A* pathfinding algorithm too slow

Why wasn't ASCII designed with a contiguous alphanumeric character order?

Two palindromes are not enough



How to split an equation over two lines?


aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizesplitting an equation inside curly brackets onto 2 lines without using BigError using split within an equationsplit equation in multiple linesList of equations, including equation contents and captionCan't generate png with Error: Erroneous nesting of equation structuresSplit matrix over two linesLatex beamer, Align equation within a tableHow continue a equation next lineHow can I align this equation in the center?













5















I am new to LaTeX,



Here is my formula,



Output



documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
small
Delta (h)_T+S =
prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_paired)
P(x^j,y^jright]left[fracpdr_y^j+1)P(sl)
P(dlright]
endequation
enddocument


I want the equation to be split over two lines, how can I do this?
I tried, multline, align*, split, alignedat, nothing seems to work. Please help me with this. Thank you in advance.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:14











  • How wide is the textblock? (Alternatively, please tell us which paper size is employed, and how wide the margins are.)

    – Mico
    Jun 21 at 3:01















5















I am new to LaTeX,



Here is my formula,



Output



documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
small
Delta (h)_T+S =
prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_paired)
P(x^j,y^jright]left[fracpdr_y^j+1)P(sl)
P(dlright]
endequation
enddocument


I want the equation to be split over two lines, how can I do this?
I tried, multline, align*, split, alignedat, nothing seems to work. Please help me with this. Thank you in advance.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:14











  • How wide is the textblock? (Alternatively, please tell us which paper size is employed, and how wide the margins are.)

    – Mico
    Jun 21 at 3:01













5












5








5


1






I am new to LaTeX,



Here is my formula,



Output



documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
small
Delta (h)_T+S =
prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_paired)
P(x^j,y^jright]left[fracpdr_y^j+1)P(sl)
P(dlright]
endequation
enddocument


I want the equation to be split over two lines, how can I do this?
I tried, multline, align*, split, alignedat, nothing seems to work. Please help me with this. Thank you in advance.










share|improve this question
















I am new to LaTeX,



Here is my formula,



Output



documentclassarticle
begindocument
beginequation
small
Delta (h)_T+S =
prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_paired)
P(x^j,y^jright]left[fracpdr_y^j+1)P(sl)
P(dlright]
endequation
enddocument


I want the equation to be split over two lines, how can I do this?
I tried, multline, align*, split, alignedat, nothing seems to work. Please help me with this. Thank you in advance.







math-mode equations






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 21 at 20:14









AboAmmar

36k3 gold badges30 silver badges86 bronze badges




36k3 gold badges30 silver badges86 bronze badges










asked Jun 20 at 20:01









Shilpa JanarthananShilpa Janarthanan

262 bronze badges




262 bronze badges







  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:14











  • How wide is the textblock? (Alternatively, please tell us which paper size is employed, and how wide the margins are.)

    – Mico
    Jun 21 at 3:01












  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:14











  • How wide is the textblock? (Alternatively, please tell us which paper size is employed, and how wide the margins are.)

    – Mico
    Jun 21 at 3:01







2




2





Welcome to TeX.SE.

– Sebastiano
Jun 20 at 20:14





Welcome to TeX.SE.

– Sebastiano
Jun 20 at 20:14













How wide is the textblock? (Alternatively, please tell us which paper size is employed, and how wide the margins are.)

– Mico
Jun 21 at 3:01





How wide is the textblock? (Alternatively, please tell us which paper size is employed, and how wide the margins are.)

– Mico
Jun 21 at 3:01










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















10














Here there is my proposal to split your equation.



EDIT: The slight change in my code is due an additional cdot.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
usepackagemathtools,amssymb
begindocument
beginequation
beginsplit
Delta (h)_T+S & =prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
P(x^j,y^jright] \
& cdot left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
P(dlright]
endsplit
endequation
enddocument





share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Thank you so much, this works fine.

    – Shilpa Janarthanan
    Jun 20 at 20:14






  • 1





    This is unusual typesetting. You've put the line break in a sensible place, but I've never seen anybody write the operator on both lines. blah cdot \ blah or blah \ cdot blah are normal.

    – David Richerby
    Jun 21 at 14:35






  • 3





    @DavidRicherby blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2007/09/01/… suggests that this is "popular in Russian mathematical typography".

    – Marcel Krüger
    Jun 22 at 9:18


















8














The brackets are surplus here, the fraction is a group by itself, so you don't need extra grouping. If I use brackets, I will enclose the whole formula to the right of the = sign into a pair of brackets. I also used biggl[ and biggr] for easy splitting. Finally, as @Sebastiano suggested, use mathrm for text.



Note: you didn't tell us how thick the margins are, so I assumed 1in. If my answer is still too wide, uncomment the small block.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackage[margin=1in]geometry

begindocument

%small
beginequation
beginsplit Delta (h)_T+S &=
prod_j=1^N biggl[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
P(x^j,y^j times \
&phantom=fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
P(dlbiggr]
endsplit
endequation
%

enddocument



enter image description here







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I'm a little late for a positive vote on your good work.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:52






  • 1





    Thank you, you were the fastest.

    – AboAmmar
    Jun 20 at 20:57











  • If possible, I'd push the second line to the right so it began to the right of the product sign. That would visually cue that it's a part of the product (though the brackets and the presence of $j$s in the second line do make this semantically clear).

    – David Richerby
    Jun 21 at 14:36


















6














A way to put the equation on a single line, with the splitfrac command from mathtools, the medmath command from nccmath and some adjustment for the delimiters:



documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
usepackagemathtools, nccmath, amssymb

begindocument

beginequation
Delta (h)_T+S =prod_j=1^N left[frac P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)right]cdot
left[fracmedmathsplitfracP(bp)_x^j,y^j
Pbigl(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1bigr)P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)Pbigl(dr_y^jbigr)Pbigl(dr_y^jmid pdr_y^j+1bigr)rule[-1.5ex]0pt1exP(sl)
P(dlright]
endequation

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer

























  • I know the command splitfrac but I did not want to use it because it is not my favorite. +1

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:59






  • 2





    @Sebastiano: I think it mainly depends on the case at hand. Here, combined with medmath and some vertical space tweaking, I find it doesn't look so bad

    – Bernard
    Jun 20 at 21:04











  • De gustibus non disputandum est: There's no discussion of the tastes. :-)

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 21:10







  • 2





    Needless to translate – when I was a student, I helped some highschool students in Latin ;o)

    – Bernard
    Jun 20 at 21:16


















5














one more alternative, with use of mathtools and nccmath:



documentclassarticle
usepackagegeometry
usepackagemathtools, nccmath

%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackageshowframe
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
%---------------------------------------------------------------%
begindocument
beginequation
medmath
beginmultlined
Delta (h)_T+S
= prod_j=1^N Biggl[fracP(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)Biggr]\
cdot Biggl[fracP(bp)_x^j,y^j P(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1) P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^j
P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr)Biggr]
endmultlined

endequation
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Fast as lightning...:-) +1.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:51


















4














Here's a multlined-based solution. It also uses mid rather than | to denote conditioning, and it "snugs up" the subscript terms to dr.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]geometry % make suitable page and margin choices
usepackagemathtools % for 'multlined' environment

begindocument

beginequation
renewcommand!mkern-2mu % default: mkern-3mu
beginmultlined
Delta(h)_T+S = prod_j=1^N biggl[
frac P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmpaired)%
P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmunpaired)\
times
fracP(bp)_x^j!,y^j
P(bp_x^j!,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1!,y^j+1)
P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)
P(dr_!y^j)P(dr_!y^jmid pdr_!y^j+1)%
P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr) biggr]
endmultlined
endequation
enddocument





share|improve this answer






























    4














    With multiline one can insert \ at the locations where the line should be broken.



    Multiletter subscripts ought not be set in math italics, the kerning is wrong. I suggest to warp them in mathrm



    The fontsize change needs to be outside the equation and without following it. small was still a bit to large, but with footnotesize the equation fits even without cheating and changing the margin sizes.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument


    footnotesize
    beginmultline
    Delta (h)_T+S =
    prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jright]cdot\
    left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endmultline


    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      Thanks you so much, this works fine as well.

      – Shilpa Janarthanan
      Jun 20 at 20:15











    • @ShilpaJanarthanan Was my pleasure!

      – gigi
      Jun 20 at 20:15












    • Can you please tell me, how to add cdot in the above code, to show the continuity of the equation?

      – Shilpa Janarthanan
      Jun 20 at 20:24











    • @ShilpaJanarthanan Please check now. Also please don't have whole words in math italic.

      – gigi
      Jun 20 at 20:30













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496697%2fhow-to-split-an-equation-over-two-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10














    Here there is my proposal to split your equation.



    EDIT: The slight change in my code is due an additional cdot.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
    usepackagemathtools,amssymb
    begindocument
    beginequation
    beginsplit
    Delta (h)_T+S & =prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jright] \
    & cdot left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endsplit
    endequation
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      Thank you so much, this works fine.

      – Shilpa Janarthanan
      Jun 20 at 20:14






    • 1





      This is unusual typesetting. You've put the line break in a sensible place, but I've never seen anybody write the operator on both lines. blah cdot \ blah or blah \ cdot blah are normal.

      – David Richerby
      Jun 21 at 14:35






    • 3





      @DavidRicherby blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2007/09/01/… suggests that this is "popular in Russian mathematical typography".

      – Marcel Krüger
      Jun 22 at 9:18















    10














    Here there is my proposal to split your equation.



    EDIT: The slight change in my code is due an additional cdot.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
    usepackagemathtools,amssymb
    begindocument
    beginequation
    beginsplit
    Delta (h)_T+S & =prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jright] \
    & cdot left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endsplit
    endequation
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      Thank you so much, this works fine.

      – Shilpa Janarthanan
      Jun 20 at 20:14






    • 1





      This is unusual typesetting. You've put the line break in a sensible place, but I've never seen anybody write the operator on both lines. blah cdot \ blah or blah \ cdot blah are normal.

      – David Richerby
      Jun 21 at 14:35






    • 3





      @DavidRicherby blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2007/09/01/… suggests that this is "popular in Russian mathematical typography".

      – Marcel Krüger
      Jun 22 at 9:18













    10












    10








    10







    Here there is my proposal to split your equation.



    EDIT: The slight change in my code is due an additional cdot.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
    usepackagemathtools,amssymb
    begindocument
    beginequation
    beginsplit
    Delta (h)_T+S & =prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jright] \
    & cdot left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endsplit
    endequation
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer















    Here there is my proposal to split your equation.



    EDIT: The slight change in my code is due an additional cdot.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
    usepackagemathtools,amssymb
    begindocument
    beginequation
    beginsplit
    Delta (h)_T+S & =prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jright] \
    & cdot left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endsplit
    endequation
    enddocument






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jun 22 at 12:07

























    answered Jun 20 at 20:10









    SebastianoSebastiano

    13.2k5 gold badges25 silver badges71 bronze badges




    13.2k5 gold badges25 silver badges71 bronze badges







    • 1





      Thank you so much, this works fine.

      – Shilpa Janarthanan
      Jun 20 at 20:14






    • 1





      This is unusual typesetting. You've put the line break in a sensible place, but I've never seen anybody write the operator on both lines. blah cdot \ blah or blah \ cdot blah are normal.

      – David Richerby
      Jun 21 at 14:35






    • 3





      @DavidRicherby blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2007/09/01/… suggests that this is "popular in Russian mathematical typography".

      – Marcel Krüger
      Jun 22 at 9:18












    • 1





      Thank you so much, this works fine.

      – Shilpa Janarthanan
      Jun 20 at 20:14






    • 1





      This is unusual typesetting. You've put the line break in a sensible place, but I've never seen anybody write the operator on both lines. blah cdot \ blah or blah \ cdot blah are normal.

      – David Richerby
      Jun 21 at 14:35






    • 3





      @DavidRicherby blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2007/09/01/… suggests that this is "popular in Russian mathematical typography".

      – Marcel Krüger
      Jun 22 at 9:18







    1




    1





    Thank you so much, this works fine.

    – Shilpa Janarthanan
    Jun 20 at 20:14





    Thank you so much, this works fine.

    – Shilpa Janarthanan
    Jun 20 at 20:14




    1




    1





    This is unusual typesetting. You've put the line break in a sensible place, but I've never seen anybody write the operator on both lines. blah cdot \ blah or blah \ cdot blah are normal.

    – David Richerby
    Jun 21 at 14:35





    This is unusual typesetting. You've put the line break in a sensible place, but I've never seen anybody write the operator on both lines. blah cdot \ blah or blah \ cdot blah are normal.

    – David Richerby
    Jun 21 at 14:35




    3




    3





    @DavidRicherby blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2007/09/01/… suggests that this is "popular in Russian mathematical typography".

    – Marcel Krüger
    Jun 22 at 9:18





    @DavidRicherby blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2007/09/01/… suggests that this is "popular in Russian mathematical typography".

    – Marcel Krüger
    Jun 22 at 9:18











    8














    The brackets are surplus here, the fraction is a group by itself, so you don't need extra grouping. If I use brackets, I will enclose the whole formula to the right of the = sign into a pair of brackets. I also used biggl[ and biggr] for easy splitting. Finally, as @Sebastiano suggested, use mathrm for text.



    Note: you didn't tell us how thick the margins are, so I assumed 1in. If my answer is still too wide, uncomment the small block.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackage[margin=1in]geometry

    begindocument

    %small
    beginequation
    beginsplit Delta (h)_T+S &=
    prod_j=1^N biggl[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^j times \
    &phantom=fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlbiggr]
    endsplit
    endequation
    %

    enddocument



    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      I'm a little late for a positive vote on your good work.

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:52






    • 1





      Thank you, you were the fastest.

      – AboAmmar
      Jun 20 at 20:57











    • If possible, I'd push the second line to the right so it began to the right of the product sign. That would visually cue that it's a part of the product (though the brackets and the presence of $j$s in the second line do make this semantically clear).

      – David Richerby
      Jun 21 at 14:36















    8














    The brackets are surplus here, the fraction is a group by itself, so you don't need extra grouping. If I use brackets, I will enclose the whole formula to the right of the = sign into a pair of brackets. I also used biggl[ and biggr] for easy splitting. Finally, as @Sebastiano suggested, use mathrm for text.



    Note: you didn't tell us how thick the margins are, so I assumed 1in. If my answer is still too wide, uncomment the small block.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackage[margin=1in]geometry

    begindocument

    %small
    beginequation
    beginsplit Delta (h)_T+S &=
    prod_j=1^N biggl[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^j times \
    &phantom=fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlbiggr]
    endsplit
    endequation
    %

    enddocument



    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      I'm a little late for a positive vote on your good work.

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:52






    • 1





      Thank you, you were the fastest.

      – AboAmmar
      Jun 20 at 20:57











    • If possible, I'd push the second line to the right so it began to the right of the product sign. That would visually cue that it's a part of the product (though the brackets and the presence of $j$s in the second line do make this semantically clear).

      – David Richerby
      Jun 21 at 14:36













    8












    8








    8







    The brackets are surplus here, the fraction is a group by itself, so you don't need extra grouping. If I use brackets, I will enclose the whole formula to the right of the = sign into a pair of brackets. I also used biggl[ and biggr] for easy splitting. Finally, as @Sebastiano suggested, use mathrm for text.



    Note: you didn't tell us how thick the margins are, so I assumed 1in. If my answer is still too wide, uncomment the small block.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackage[margin=1in]geometry

    begindocument

    %small
    beginequation
    beginsplit Delta (h)_T+S &=
    prod_j=1^N biggl[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^j times \
    &phantom=fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlbiggr]
    endsplit
    endequation
    %

    enddocument



    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer















    The brackets are surplus here, the fraction is a group by itself, so you don't need extra grouping. If I use brackets, I will enclose the whole formula to the right of the = sign into a pair of brackets. I also used biggl[ and biggr] for easy splitting. Finally, as @Sebastiano suggested, use mathrm for text.



    Note: you didn't tell us how thick the margins are, so I assumed 1in. If my answer is still too wide, uncomment the small block.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackage[margin=1in]geometry

    begindocument

    %small
    beginequation
    beginsplit Delta (h)_T+S &=
    prod_j=1^N biggl[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^j times \
    &phantom=fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
    P(dlbiggr]
    endsplit
    endequation
    %

    enddocument



    enter image description here








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jun 20 at 20:55

























    answered Jun 20 at 20:41









    AboAmmarAboAmmar

    36k3 gold badges30 silver badges86 bronze badges




    36k3 gold badges30 silver badges86 bronze badges







    • 1





      I'm a little late for a positive vote on your good work.

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:52






    • 1





      Thank you, you were the fastest.

      – AboAmmar
      Jun 20 at 20:57











    • If possible, I'd push the second line to the right so it began to the right of the product sign. That would visually cue that it's a part of the product (though the brackets and the presence of $j$s in the second line do make this semantically clear).

      – David Richerby
      Jun 21 at 14:36












    • 1





      I'm a little late for a positive vote on your good work.

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:52






    • 1





      Thank you, you were the fastest.

      – AboAmmar
      Jun 20 at 20:57











    • If possible, I'd push the second line to the right so it began to the right of the product sign. That would visually cue that it's a part of the product (though the brackets and the presence of $j$s in the second line do make this semantically clear).

      – David Richerby
      Jun 21 at 14:36







    1




    1





    I'm a little late for a positive vote on your good work.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:52





    I'm a little late for a positive vote on your good work.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:52




    1




    1





    Thank you, you were the fastest.

    – AboAmmar
    Jun 20 at 20:57





    Thank you, you were the fastest.

    – AboAmmar
    Jun 20 at 20:57













    If possible, I'd push the second line to the right so it began to the right of the product sign. That would visually cue that it's a part of the product (though the brackets and the presence of $j$s in the second line do make this semantically clear).

    – David Richerby
    Jun 21 at 14:36





    If possible, I'd push the second line to the right so it began to the right of the product sign. That would visually cue that it's a part of the product (though the brackets and the presence of $j$s in the second line do make this semantically clear).

    – David Richerby
    Jun 21 at 14:36











    6














    A way to put the equation on a single line, with the splitfrac command from mathtools, the medmath command from nccmath and some adjustment for the delimiters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
    usepackagemathtools, nccmath, amssymb

    begindocument

    beginequation
    Delta (h)_T+S =prod_j=1^N left[frac P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)right]cdot
    left[fracmedmathsplitfracP(bp)_x^j,y^j
    Pbigl(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1bigr)P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)Pbigl(dr_y^jbigr)Pbigl(dr_y^jmid pdr_y^j+1bigr)rule[-1.5ex]0pt1exP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endequation

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • I know the command splitfrac but I did not want to use it because it is not my favorite. +1

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:59






    • 2





      @Sebastiano: I think it mainly depends on the case at hand. Here, combined with medmath and some vertical space tweaking, I find it doesn't look so bad

      – Bernard
      Jun 20 at 21:04











    • De gustibus non disputandum est: There's no discussion of the tastes. :-)

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 21:10







    • 2





      Needless to translate – when I was a student, I helped some highschool students in Latin ;o)

      – Bernard
      Jun 20 at 21:16















    6














    A way to put the equation on a single line, with the splitfrac command from mathtools, the medmath command from nccmath and some adjustment for the delimiters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
    usepackagemathtools, nccmath, amssymb

    begindocument

    beginequation
    Delta (h)_T+S =prod_j=1^N left[frac P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)right]cdot
    left[fracmedmathsplitfracP(bp)_x^j,y^j
    Pbigl(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1bigr)P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)Pbigl(dr_y^jbigr)Pbigl(dr_y^jmid pdr_y^j+1bigr)rule[-1.5ex]0pt1exP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endequation

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • I know the command splitfrac but I did not want to use it because it is not my favorite. +1

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:59






    • 2





      @Sebastiano: I think it mainly depends on the case at hand. Here, combined with medmath and some vertical space tweaking, I find it doesn't look so bad

      – Bernard
      Jun 20 at 21:04











    • De gustibus non disputandum est: There's no discussion of the tastes. :-)

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 21:10







    • 2





      Needless to translate – when I was a student, I helped some highschool students in Latin ;o)

      – Bernard
      Jun 20 at 21:16













    6












    6








    6







    A way to put the equation on a single line, with the splitfrac command from mathtools, the medmath command from nccmath and some adjustment for the delimiters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
    usepackagemathtools, nccmath, amssymb

    begindocument

    beginequation
    Delta (h)_T+S =prod_j=1^N left[frac P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)right]cdot
    left[fracmedmathsplitfracP(bp)_x^j,y^j
    Pbigl(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1bigr)P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)Pbigl(dr_y^jbigr)Pbigl(dr_y^jmid pdr_y^j+1bigr)rule[-1.5ex]0pt1exP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endequation

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer















    A way to put the equation on a single line, with the splitfrac command from mathtools, the medmath command from nccmath and some adjustment for the delimiters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[margin=2cm]geometry
    usepackagemathtools, nccmath, amssymb

    begindocument

    beginequation
    Delta (h)_T+S =prod_j=1^N left[frac P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)right]cdot
    left[fracmedmathsplitfracP(bp)_x^j,y^j
    Pbigl(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1bigr)P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)Pbigl(dr_y^jbigr)Pbigl(dr_y^jmid pdr_y^j+1bigr)rule[-1.5ex]0pt1exP(sl)
    P(dlright]
    endequation

    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jun 21 at 8:50

























    answered Jun 20 at 20:58









    BernardBernard

    182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges




    182k7 gold badges83 silver badges216 bronze badges












    • I know the command splitfrac but I did not want to use it because it is not my favorite. +1

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:59






    • 2





      @Sebastiano: I think it mainly depends on the case at hand. Here, combined with medmath and some vertical space tweaking, I find it doesn't look so bad

      – Bernard
      Jun 20 at 21:04











    • De gustibus non disputandum est: There's no discussion of the tastes. :-)

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 21:10







    • 2





      Needless to translate – when I was a student, I helped some highschool students in Latin ;o)

      – Bernard
      Jun 20 at 21:16

















    • I know the command splitfrac but I did not want to use it because it is not my favorite. +1

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:59






    • 2





      @Sebastiano: I think it mainly depends on the case at hand. Here, combined with medmath and some vertical space tweaking, I find it doesn't look so bad

      – Bernard
      Jun 20 at 21:04











    • De gustibus non disputandum est: There's no discussion of the tastes. :-)

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 21:10







    • 2





      Needless to translate – when I was a student, I helped some highschool students in Latin ;o)

      – Bernard
      Jun 20 at 21:16
















    I know the command splitfrac but I did not want to use it because it is not my favorite. +1

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:59





    I know the command splitfrac but I did not want to use it because it is not my favorite. +1

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:59




    2




    2





    @Sebastiano: I think it mainly depends on the case at hand. Here, combined with medmath and some vertical space tweaking, I find it doesn't look so bad

    – Bernard
    Jun 20 at 21:04





    @Sebastiano: I think it mainly depends on the case at hand. Here, combined with medmath and some vertical space tweaking, I find it doesn't look so bad

    – Bernard
    Jun 20 at 21:04













    De gustibus non disputandum est: There's no discussion of the tastes. :-)

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 21:10






    De gustibus non disputandum est: There's no discussion of the tastes. :-)

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 21:10





    2




    2





    Needless to translate – when I was a student, I helped some highschool students in Latin ;o)

    – Bernard
    Jun 20 at 21:16





    Needless to translate – when I was a student, I helped some highschool students in Latin ;o)

    – Bernard
    Jun 20 at 21:16











    5














    one more alternative, with use of mathtools and nccmath:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagegeometry
    usepackagemathtools, nccmath

    %---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
    usepackageshowframe
    renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
    renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
    %---------------------------------------------------------------%
    begindocument
    beginequation
    medmath
    beginmultlined
    Delta (h)_T+S
    = prod_j=1^N Biggl[fracP(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)Biggr]\
    cdot Biggl[fracP(bp)_x^j,y^j P(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1) P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^j
    P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr)Biggr]
    endmultlined

    endequation
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Fast as lightning...:-) +1.

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:51















    5














    one more alternative, with use of mathtools and nccmath:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagegeometry
    usepackagemathtools, nccmath

    %---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
    usepackageshowframe
    renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
    renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
    %---------------------------------------------------------------%
    begindocument
    beginequation
    medmath
    beginmultlined
    Delta (h)_T+S
    = prod_j=1^N Biggl[fracP(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)Biggr]\
    cdot Biggl[fracP(bp)_x^j,y^j P(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1) P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^j
    P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr)Biggr]
    endmultlined

    endequation
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Fast as lightning...:-) +1.

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:51













    5












    5








    5







    one more alternative, with use of mathtools and nccmath:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagegeometry
    usepackagemathtools, nccmath

    %---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
    usepackageshowframe
    renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
    renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
    %---------------------------------------------------------------%
    begindocument
    beginequation
    medmath
    beginmultlined
    Delta (h)_T+S
    = prod_j=1^N Biggl[fracP(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)Biggr]\
    cdot Biggl[fracP(bp)_x^j,y^j P(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1) P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^j
    P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr)Biggr]
    endmultlined

    endequation
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer













    one more alternative, with use of mathtools and nccmath:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagegeometry
    usepackagemathtools, nccmath

    %---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
    usepackageshowframe
    renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness0.15pt
    renewcommand*ShowFrameColorcolorred
    %---------------------------------------------------------------%
    begindocument
    beginequation
    medmath
    beginmultlined
    Delta (h)_T+S
    = prod_j=1^N Biggl[fracP(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmpaired)
    P(x^j,y^jmidtheta_mathrmunpaired)Biggr]\
    cdot Biggl[fracP(bp)_x^j,y^j P(bp_x^j,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1,y^j+1) P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^j
    P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr)Biggr]
    endmultlined

    endequation
    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 20 at 20:49









    ZarkoZarko

    138k8 gold badges75 silver badges184 bronze badges




    138k8 gold badges75 silver badges184 bronze badges







    • 1





      Fast as lightning...:-) +1.

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:51












    • 1





      Fast as lightning...:-) +1.

      – Sebastiano
      Jun 20 at 20:51







    1




    1





    Fast as lightning...:-) +1.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:51





    Fast as lightning...:-) +1.

    – Sebastiano
    Jun 20 at 20:51











    4














    Here's a multlined-based solution. It also uses mid rather than | to denote conditioning, and it "snugs up" the subscript terms to dr.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]geometry % make suitable page and margin choices
    usepackagemathtools % for 'multlined' environment

    begindocument

    beginequation
    renewcommand!mkern-2mu % default: mkern-3mu
    beginmultlined
    Delta(h)_T+S = prod_j=1^N biggl[
    frac P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmpaired)%
    P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmunpaired)\
    times
    fracP(bp)_x^j!,y^j
    P(bp_x^j!,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1!,y^j+1)
    P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)
    P(dr_!y^j)P(dr_!y^jmid pdr_!y^j+1)%
    P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr) biggr]
    endmultlined
    endequation
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer



























      4














      Here's a multlined-based solution. It also uses mid rather than | to denote conditioning, and it "snugs up" the subscript terms to dr.



      enter image description here



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]geometry % make suitable page and margin choices
      usepackagemathtools % for 'multlined' environment

      begindocument

      beginequation
      renewcommand!mkern-2mu % default: mkern-3mu
      beginmultlined
      Delta(h)_T+S = prod_j=1^N biggl[
      frac P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmpaired)%
      P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmunpaired)\
      times
      fracP(bp)_x^j!,y^j
      P(bp_x^j!,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1!,y^j+1)
      P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)
      P(dr_!y^j)P(dr_!y^jmid pdr_!y^j+1)%
      P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr) biggr]
      endmultlined
      endequation
      enddocument





      share|improve this answer

























        4












        4








        4







        Here's a multlined-based solution. It also uses mid rather than | to denote conditioning, and it "snugs up" the subscript terms to dr.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]geometry % make suitable page and margin choices
        usepackagemathtools % for 'multlined' environment

        begindocument

        beginequation
        renewcommand!mkern-2mu % default: mkern-3mu
        beginmultlined
        Delta(h)_T+S = prod_j=1^N biggl[
        frac P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmpaired)%
        P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmunpaired)\
        times
        fracP(bp)_x^j!,y^j
        P(bp_x^j!,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1!,y^j+1)
        P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)
        P(dr_!y^j)P(dr_!y^jmid pdr_!y^j+1)%
        P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr) biggr]
        endmultlined
        endequation
        enddocument





        share|improve this answer













        Here's a multlined-based solution. It also uses mid rather than | to denote conditioning, and it "snugs up" the subscript terms to dr.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]geometry % make suitable page and margin choices
        usepackagemathtools % for 'multlined' environment

        begindocument

        beginequation
        renewcommand!mkern-2mu % default: mkern-3mu
        beginmultlined
        Delta(h)_T+S = prod_j=1^N biggl[
        frac P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmpaired)%
        P(x^j!,y^jmid theta_mathrmunpaired)\
        times
        fracP(bp)_x^j!,y^j
        P(bp_x^j!,y^jmid pbp_x^j-1!,y^j+1)
        P(dl_x^j) P(dl_x^jmid pdl_x^j-1)
        P(dr_!y^j)P(dr_!y^jmid pdr_!y^j+1)%
        P(sl) P(dlmid sl) P(sr) P(drmid sr) biggr]
        endmultlined
        endequation
        enddocument






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jun 21 at 3:18









        MicoMico

        295k32 gold badges410 silver badges806 bronze badges




        295k32 gold badges410 silver badges806 bronze badges





















            4














            With multiline one can insert \ at the locations where the line should be broken.



            Multiletter subscripts ought not be set in math italics, the kerning is wrong. I suggest to warp them in mathrm



            The fontsize change needs to be outside the equation and without following it. small was still a bit to large, but with footnotesize the equation fits even without cheating and changing the margin sizes.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath

            begindocument


            footnotesize
            beginmultline
            Delta (h)_T+S =
            prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
            P(x^j,y^jright]cdot\
            left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
            P(dlright]
            endmultline


            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              Thanks you so much, this works fine as well.

              – Shilpa Janarthanan
              Jun 20 at 20:15











            • @ShilpaJanarthanan Was my pleasure!

              – gigi
              Jun 20 at 20:15












            • Can you please tell me, how to add cdot in the above code, to show the continuity of the equation?

              – Shilpa Janarthanan
              Jun 20 at 20:24











            • @ShilpaJanarthanan Please check now. Also please don't have whole words in math italic.

              – gigi
              Jun 20 at 20:30















            4














            With multiline one can insert \ at the locations where the line should be broken.



            Multiletter subscripts ought not be set in math italics, the kerning is wrong. I suggest to warp them in mathrm



            The fontsize change needs to be outside the equation and without following it. small was still a bit to large, but with footnotesize the equation fits even without cheating and changing the margin sizes.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath

            begindocument


            footnotesize
            beginmultline
            Delta (h)_T+S =
            prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
            P(x^j,y^jright]cdot\
            left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
            P(dlright]
            endmultline


            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              Thanks you so much, this works fine as well.

              – Shilpa Janarthanan
              Jun 20 at 20:15











            • @ShilpaJanarthanan Was my pleasure!

              – gigi
              Jun 20 at 20:15












            • Can you please tell me, how to add cdot in the above code, to show the continuity of the equation?

              – Shilpa Janarthanan
              Jun 20 at 20:24











            • @ShilpaJanarthanan Please check now. Also please don't have whole words in math italic.

              – gigi
              Jun 20 at 20:30













            4












            4








            4







            With multiline one can insert \ at the locations where the line should be broken.



            Multiletter subscripts ought not be set in math italics, the kerning is wrong. I suggest to warp them in mathrm



            The fontsize change needs to be outside the equation and without following it. small was still a bit to large, but with footnotesize the equation fits even without cheating and changing the margin sizes.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath

            begindocument


            footnotesize
            beginmultline
            Delta (h)_T+S =
            prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
            P(x^j,y^jright]cdot\
            left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
            P(dlright]
            endmultline


            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer















            With multiline one can insert \ at the locations where the line should be broken.



            Multiletter subscripts ought not be set in math italics, the kerning is wrong. I suggest to warp them in mathrm



            The fontsize change needs to be outside the equation and without following it. small was still a bit to large, but with footnotesize the equation fits even without cheating and changing the margin sizes.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath

            begindocument


            footnotesize
            beginmultline
            Delta (h)_T+S =
            prod_j=1^N left[frac theta_mathrmpaired)
            P(x^j,y^jright]cdot\
            left[fracpdl_x^j-1)P(dr_y^j)P(dr_y^jP(sl)
            P(dlright]
            endmultline


            enddocument


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jun 22 at 12:05

























            answered Jun 20 at 20:12









            gigigigi

            37211 bronze badges




            37211 bronze badges







            • 1





              Thanks you so much, this works fine as well.

              – Shilpa Janarthanan
              Jun 20 at 20:15











            • @ShilpaJanarthanan Was my pleasure!

              – gigi
              Jun 20 at 20:15












            • Can you please tell me, how to add cdot in the above code, to show the continuity of the equation?

              – Shilpa Janarthanan
              Jun 20 at 20:24











            • @ShilpaJanarthanan Please check now. Also please don't have whole words in math italic.

              – gigi
              Jun 20 at 20:30












            • 1





              Thanks you so much, this works fine as well.

              – Shilpa Janarthanan
              Jun 20 at 20:15











            • @ShilpaJanarthanan Was my pleasure!

              – gigi
              Jun 20 at 20:15












            • Can you please tell me, how to add cdot in the above code, to show the continuity of the equation?

              – Shilpa Janarthanan
              Jun 20 at 20:24











            • @ShilpaJanarthanan Please check now. Also please don't have whole words in math italic.

              – gigi
              Jun 20 at 20:30







            1




            1





            Thanks you so much, this works fine as well.

            – Shilpa Janarthanan
            Jun 20 at 20:15





            Thanks you so much, this works fine as well.

            – Shilpa Janarthanan
            Jun 20 at 20:15













            @ShilpaJanarthanan Was my pleasure!

            – gigi
            Jun 20 at 20:15






            @ShilpaJanarthanan Was my pleasure!

            – gigi
            Jun 20 at 20:15














            Can you please tell me, how to add cdot in the above code, to show the continuity of the equation?

            – Shilpa Janarthanan
            Jun 20 at 20:24





            Can you please tell me, how to add cdot in the above code, to show the continuity of the equation?

            – Shilpa Janarthanan
            Jun 20 at 20:24













            @ShilpaJanarthanan Please check now. Also please don't have whole words in math italic.

            – gigi
            Jun 20 at 20:30





            @ShilpaJanarthanan Please check now. Also please don't have whole words in math italic.

            – gigi
            Jun 20 at 20:30

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496697%2fhow-to-split-an-equation-over-two-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?