No Torah = Revert to Nothingness?What is the source for the idea that only two mitzvot have a specific reward associated with them?If two separate studies intersect, is it a good sign?Learning Torah without understandingTsnius for Women : Talmud Torah for MenFrom whence do we learn that the Torah does not mince words?Torah out of order and the resurrection“God looked into the Torah to create the world”Midrash About God Repeating Words of TorahTorah punctuated with trop?Learning Torah in places with no Yeshivot
Is it rude to refer to janitors as 'floor people'?
Teferi's Time Twist on creature with +1/+1 counter
Getting fresh water in the middle of hypersaline lake in the Bronze Age
Can I send medicine to an American visitor in Canada?
In special relativity is mass just a measure of all other energy than kinetic?
What do mathematicians mean when they say some conjecture can’t be proven using the current technology?
Mathematica function equivalent to Matlab's residue function (partial fraction expansion)
Should I be able to keep my company purchased standing desk when I leave my job?
What are some symbols representing peasants/oppressed persons fighting back?
Can a pizza stone be fixed after soap has been used to clean it?
Is 7000 words too long for a chapter?
What's the phrasal verb for carbonated drinks exploding out of the can after being shaken?
How could an animal "smell" carbon monoxide?
What systems of robust steganography are out there?
Video editor for YouTube
Why doesn't philosophy have higher standards for its arguments?
Identification of an AC transformer
If I stood next to a piece of metal heated to a million degrees, but in a perfect vacuum, would I feel hot?
How are packets handled and prioritized over a link with multiple VLANS?
Is there a way to tell what object an 18 digit ID refers to?
What do these three diagonal lines that cross through three measures and both staves mean, and what are they called?
Is this artwork (used in a video game) real?
Why isn't aluminium involved in biological processes?
Did 007 exist before James Bond?
No Torah = Revert to Nothingness?
What is the source for the idea that only two mitzvot have a specific reward associated with them?If two separate studies intersect, is it a good sign?Learning Torah without understandingTsnius for Women : Talmud Torah for MenFrom whence do we learn that the Torah does not mince words?Torah out of order and the resurrection“God looked into the Torah to create the world”Midrash About God Repeating Words of TorahTorah punctuated with trop?Learning Torah in places with no Yeshivot
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Although I have often heard that the world would revert to nothingness if there wasn't someone learning Torah at any given moment, I haven't seen this written yet - what is the source of this concept?
sources-mekorot torah-study creation
add a comment |
Although I have often heard that the world would revert to nothingness if there wasn't someone learning Torah at any given moment, I haven't seen this written yet - what is the source of this concept?
sources-mekorot torah-study creation
It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.
– LN6595
Jul 7 at 23:28
add a comment |
Although I have often heard that the world would revert to nothingness if there wasn't someone learning Torah at any given moment, I haven't seen this written yet - what is the source of this concept?
sources-mekorot torah-study creation
Although I have often heard that the world would revert to nothingness if there wasn't someone learning Torah at any given moment, I haven't seen this written yet - what is the source of this concept?
sources-mekorot torah-study creation
sources-mekorot torah-study creation
edited Jul 7 at 14:59
NJM
asked Jul 7 at 13:36
NJMNJM
4,2761 gold badge8 silver badges32 bronze badges
4,2761 gold badge8 silver badges32 bronze badges
It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.
– LN6595
Jul 7 at 23:28
add a comment |
It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.
– LN6595
Jul 7 at 23:28
It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.
– LN6595
Jul 7 at 23:28
It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.
– LN6595
Jul 7 at 23:28
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:
אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.
Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.
– robev
Jul 8 at 1:25
@robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.
– Jay
Jul 8 at 3:04
add a comment |
Pesachim 68b:
אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי
Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).
As Rashi ad. loc. explains:
אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:
If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).
2
Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 14:30
@DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:50
2
@Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 15:50
It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:53
@YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.
– DonielF
Jul 7 at 15:55
|
show 11 more comments
Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):
ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;
rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:
אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.
Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.
– robev
Jul 8 at 1:25
@robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.
– Jay
Jul 8 at 3:04
add a comment |
The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:
אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.
Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.
– robev
Jul 8 at 1:25
@robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.
– Jay
Jul 8 at 3:04
add a comment |
The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:
אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.
The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:
אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.
edited Jul 8 at 1:24
robev
7,1632 gold badges18 silver badges50 bronze badges
7,1632 gold badges18 silver badges50 bronze badges
answered Jul 7 at 17:51
JayJay
4,6567 silver badges22 bronze badges
4,6567 silver badges22 bronze badges
Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.
– robev
Jul 8 at 1:25
@robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.
– Jay
Jul 8 at 3:04
add a comment |
Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.
– robev
Jul 8 at 1:25
@robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.
– Jay
Jul 8 at 3:04
Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.
– robev
Jul 8 at 1:25
Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.
– robev
Jul 8 at 1:25
@robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.
– Jay
Jul 8 at 3:04
@robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.
– Jay
Jul 8 at 3:04
add a comment |
Pesachim 68b:
אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי
Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).
As Rashi ad. loc. explains:
אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:
If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).
2
Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 14:30
@DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:50
2
@Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 15:50
It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:53
@YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.
– DonielF
Jul 7 at 15:55
|
show 11 more comments
Pesachim 68b:
אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי
Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).
As Rashi ad. loc. explains:
אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:
If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).
2
Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 14:30
@DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:50
2
@Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 15:50
It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:53
@YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.
– DonielF
Jul 7 at 15:55
|
show 11 more comments
Pesachim 68b:
אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי
Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).
As Rashi ad. loc. explains:
אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:
If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).
Pesachim 68b:
אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי
Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).
As Rashi ad. loc. explains:
אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:
If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).
edited Jul 7 at 15:51
answered Jul 7 at 13:45
DonielFDonielF
19.4k2 gold badges30 silver badges97 bronze badges
19.4k2 gold badges30 silver badges97 bronze badges
2
Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 14:30
@DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:50
2
@Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 15:50
It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:53
@YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.
– DonielF
Jul 7 at 15:55
|
show 11 more comments
2
Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 14:30
@DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:50
2
@Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 15:50
It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:53
@YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.
– DonielF
Jul 7 at 15:55
2
2
Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 14:30
Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 14:30
@DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:50
@DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:50
2
2
@Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 15:50
@Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.
– Double AA♦
Jul 7 at 15:50
It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:53
It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.
– Yaacov Deane
Jul 7 at 15:53
@YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.
– DonielF
Jul 7 at 15:55
@YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.
– DonielF
Jul 7 at 15:55
|
show 11 more comments
Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):
ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;
rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).
add a comment |
Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):
ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;
rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).
add a comment |
Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):
ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;
rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).
Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):
ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;
rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).
answered Jul 7 at 16:42
Lo aniLo ani
1,2102 silver badges14 bronze badges
1,2102 silver badges14 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.
– LN6595
Jul 7 at 23:28