No Torah = Revert to Nothingness?What is the source for the idea that only two mitzvot have a specific reward associated with them?If two separate studies intersect, is it a good sign?Learning Torah without understandingTsnius for Women : Talmud Torah for MenFrom whence do we learn that the Torah does not mince words?Torah out of order and the resurrection“God looked into the Torah to create the world”Midrash About God Repeating Words of TorahTorah punctuated with trop?Learning Torah in places with no Yeshivot

Is it rude to refer to janitors as 'floor people'?

Teferi's Time Twist on creature with +1/+1 counter

Getting fresh water in the middle of hypersaline lake in the Bronze Age

Can I send medicine to an American visitor in Canada?

In special relativity is mass just a measure of all other energy than kinetic?

What do mathematicians mean when they say some conjecture can’t be proven using the current technology?

Mathematica function equivalent to Matlab's residue function (partial fraction expansion)

Should I be able to keep my company purchased standing desk when I leave my job?

What are some symbols representing peasants/oppressed persons fighting back?

Can a pizza stone be fixed after soap has been used to clean it?

Is 7000 words too long for a chapter?

What's the phrasal verb for carbonated drinks exploding out of the can after being shaken?

How could an animal "smell" carbon monoxide?

What systems of robust steganography are out there?

Video editor for YouTube

Why doesn't philosophy have higher standards for its arguments?

Identification of an AC transformer

If I stood next to a piece of metal heated to a million degrees, but in a perfect vacuum, would I feel hot?

How are packets handled and prioritized over a link with multiple VLANS?

Is there a way to tell what object an 18 digit ID refers to?

What do these three diagonal lines that cross through three measures and both staves mean, and what are they called?

Is this artwork (used in a video game) real?

Why isn't aluminium involved in biological processes?

Did 007 exist before James Bond?



No Torah = Revert to Nothingness?


What is the source for the idea that only two mitzvot have a specific reward associated with them?If two separate studies intersect, is it a good sign?Learning Torah without understandingTsnius for Women : Talmud Torah for MenFrom whence do we learn that the Torah does not mince words?Torah out of order and the resurrection“God looked into the Torah to create the world”Midrash About God Repeating Words of TorahTorah punctuated with trop?Learning Torah in places with no Yeshivot






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















Although I have often heard that the world would revert to nothingness if there wasn't someone learning Torah at any given moment, I haven't seen this written yet - what is the source of this concept?










share|improve this question
























  • It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.

    – LN6595
    Jul 7 at 23:28

















5















Although I have often heard that the world would revert to nothingness if there wasn't someone learning Torah at any given moment, I haven't seen this written yet - what is the source of this concept?










share|improve this question
























  • It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.

    – LN6595
    Jul 7 at 23:28













5












5








5








Although I have often heard that the world would revert to nothingness if there wasn't someone learning Torah at any given moment, I haven't seen this written yet - what is the source of this concept?










share|improve this question
















Although I have often heard that the world would revert to nothingness if there wasn't someone learning Torah at any given moment, I haven't seen this written yet - what is the source of this concept?







sources-mekorot torah-study creation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 7 at 14:59







NJM

















asked Jul 7 at 13:36









NJMNJM

4,2761 gold badge8 silver badges32 bronze badges




4,2761 gold badge8 silver badges32 bronze badges












  • It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.

    – LN6595
    Jul 7 at 23:28

















  • It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.

    – LN6595
    Jul 7 at 23:28
















It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.

– LN6595
Jul 7 at 23:28





It's also a Medrash in Esther Rabba, somewhere in the discussion of the making of the decree.

– LN6595
Jul 7 at 23:28










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:




אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.







share|improve this answer

























  • Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.

    – robev
    Jul 8 at 1:25











  • @robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.

    – Jay
    Jul 8 at 3:04


















4














Pesachim 68b:




אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי



Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).




As Rashi ad. loc. explains:




אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:



If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).







share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?

    – Double AA
    Jul 7 at 14:30











  • @DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.

    – Yaacov Deane
    Jul 7 at 15:50






  • 2





    @Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.

    – Double AA
    Jul 7 at 15:50












  • It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.

    – Yaacov Deane
    Jul 7 at 15:53











  • @YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.

    – DonielF
    Jul 7 at 15:55


















1














Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):




ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;



rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).







share|improve this answer
































    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:




    אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.







    share|improve this answer

























    • Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.

      – robev
      Jul 8 at 1:25











    • @robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.

      – Jay
      Jul 8 at 3:04















    7














    The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:




    אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.







    share|improve this answer

























    • Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.

      – robev
      Jul 8 at 1:25











    • @robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.

      – Jay
      Jul 8 at 3:04













    7












    7








    7







    The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:




    אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.







    share|improve this answer















    The source that explicitly states this concept is the Nefesh Hachaim written by Rabbi Chaim Volozhiner, who sees it as being expressed by earlier sources. See for example Shaar 4:25:




    אבל אם היה ח''ו העולם פנוי לגמרי אפילו רגע אחת ממש מעסק והתבוננות עם סגולה בתו''הק. תיכף כרגע היו כל העולמות נחרבים ונבטלים ממציאות לגמרי ח''ו. ואף גם איש א' מישראל לבד. רב כחו. שבידו להעמיד ולקיים את כל העולמות והבריאה בכללה ע''י עסקו והתבוננותו בתו''הק לשמה. כמ''ש בחלק (צ''ט ב') כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. רי''א אף מגין על כל העולם כולו. וכ''א בפ' התורה כל העוסק בתורה לשמה כו'. ולא עוד אלא שכל העולם כולו כדאי הוא לו.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 8 at 1:24









    robev

    7,1632 gold badges18 silver badges50 bronze badges




    7,1632 gold badges18 silver badges50 bronze badges










    answered Jul 7 at 17:51









    JayJay

    4,6567 silver badges22 bronze badges




    4,6567 silver badges22 bronze badges












    • Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.

      – robev
      Jul 8 at 1:25











    • @robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.

      – Jay
      Jul 8 at 3:04

















    • Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.

      – robev
      Jul 8 at 1:25











    • @robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.

      – Jay
      Jul 8 at 3:04
















    Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.

    – robev
    Jul 8 at 1:25





    Although Sefaria for some reason counts "Perakim" as Shaar 4, really it's a supplementary piece, and what they call Shaar 5 is really Shaar 4. Also, he first mentions this in Chapter 11.

    – robev
    Jul 8 at 1:25













    @robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.

    – Jay
    Jul 8 at 3:04





    @robev I know. I wrote it originally as 4, but someone edited it to 5.

    – Jay
    Jul 8 at 3:04













    4














    Pesachim 68b:




    אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי



    Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).




    As Rashi ad. loc. explains:




    אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:



    If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).







    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?

      – Double AA
      Jul 7 at 14:30











    • @DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.

      – Yaacov Deane
      Jul 7 at 15:50






    • 2





      @Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.

      – Double AA
      Jul 7 at 15:50












    • It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.

      – Yaacov Deane
      Jul 7 at 15:53











    • @YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.

      – DonielF
      Jul 7 at 15:55















    4














    Pesachim 68b:




    אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי



    Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).




    As Rashi ad. loc. explains:




    אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:



    If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).







    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?

      – Double AA
      Jul 7 at 14:30











    • @DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.

      – Yaacov Deane
      Jul 7 at 15:50






    • 2





      @Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.

      – Double AA
      Jul 7 at 15:50












    • It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.

      – Yaacov Deane
      Jul 7 at 15:53











    • @YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.

      – DonielF
      Jul 7 at 15:55













    4












    4








    4







    Pesachim 68b:




    אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי



    Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).




    As Rashi ad. loc. explains:




    אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:



    If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).







    share|improve this answer















    Pesachim 68b:




    אמר רבי אלעזר אילמלא תורה לא נתקיימו שמים וארץ שנאמר אם לא בריתי יומם ולילה חקות שמים וארץ לא שמתי



    Rabbi Elazar said: If not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not be sustained, as it is stated: “If not for My covenant by day and by night, I would not have set up the laws of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25).




    As Rashi ad. loc. explains:




    אם לא בריתי - של יומם ולילה דהיינו תלמוד תורה שכתוב בו (יהושע א׳:ח׳) והגית בו יומם ולילה:



    If not for My covenant - of day and night, which is study of Torah, regarding which it’s written, “And you will contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8).








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 7 at 15:51

























    answered Jul 7 at 13:45









    DonielFDonielF

    19.4k2 gold badges30 silver badges97 bronze badges




    19.4k2 gold badges30 silver badges97 bronze badges







    • 2





      Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?

      – Double AA
      Jul 7 at 14:30











    • @DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.

      – Yaacov Deane
      Jul 7 at 15:50






    • 2





      @Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.

      – Double AA
      Jul 7 at 15:50












    • It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.

      – Yaacov Deane
      Jul 7 at 15:53











    • @YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.

      – DonielF
      Jul 7 at 15:55












    • 2





      Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?

      – Double AA
      Jul 7 at 14:30











    • @DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.

      – Yaacov Deane
      Jul 7 at 15:50






    • 2





      @Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.

      – Double AA
      Jul 7 at 15:50












    • It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.

      – Yaacov Deane
      Jul 7 at 15:53











    • @YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.

      – DonielF
      Jul 7 at 15:55







    2




    2





    Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?

    – Double AA
    Jul 7 at 14:30





    Whose translation is that? Where does the words "its study" come from in the Hebrew?

    – Double AA
    Jul 7 at 14:30













    @DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.

    – Yaacov Deane
    Jul 7 at 15:50





    @DoubleAA The OP is asking about the concept that if Israel had not accepted the Torah at Har Sinai, the universe, meaning all of creation would have reverted to Tohu v’Vohu. And that acceptance wasn’t truly fulfilled until the events of Purim, קיימו מה שקבלו.

    – Yaacov Deane
    Jul 7 at 15:50




    2




    2





    @Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.

    – Double AA
    Jul 7 at 15:50






    @Yaacov maybe. If he is he should state so explicitly. It certainly doesn't sound like that from what he wrote.

    – Double AA
    Jul 7 at 15:50














    It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.

    – Yaacov Deane
    Jul 7 at 15:53





    It would improve the question, but I suspect he doesn’t realize that’s what it is talking about. Look at what he linked to. No source or context, just a statement.

    – Yaacov Deane
    Jul 7 at 15:53













    @YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.

    – DonielF
    Jul 7 at 15:55





    @YaacovDeane If that’s what he means I’m happy to include the Gemara in Shabbos about Yom HaShishi, but as it stands this seems to address his question sufficiently.

    – DonielF
    Jul 7 at 15:55











    1














    Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):




    ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;



    rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).







    share|improve this answer



























      1














      Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):




      ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;



      rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).







      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):




        ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;



        rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).







        share|improve this answer













        Avodah zarah 3a (with steinzaltz):




        ואמר בעניין זה ר' שמעון בן לקיש, מאי דכתיב [מהו שנאמר]: "ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום הששי" (בראשית א, לא), בה"א הידיעה? מלמד שהתנה הקדוש ברוך הוא עם מעשה בראשית תנאי זה, ואמר: אם ישראל מקבלין את תורתי בזמן מתן תורה — מוטב, ואם לאו [לא] — אני אחזיר אתכם לתוהו ובוהו;



        rabbi Shimon Ben lakish said on this topic: why is it written “and there was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day”? (With the added ה in הששי). It teaches us that HaShem conditioned concerning creation this condition- if Israel accepts my Torah, good, but if not, I will return you (creation) to Tohu Vavohu ( return creation to how it was before).








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jul 7 at 16:42









        Lo aniLo ani

        1,2102 silver badges14 bronze badges




        1,2102 silver badges14 bronze badges













            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?