VHF 50 Ω Antenna Over 75 Ω TV CoaxWhat should I look for in an antenna for a DVBT Dongle used for SDR?While backpacking, is it worth mounting the antenna to the backpack frame (above my head)?Understanding coax radiation and “current on the shield”Transposing gqrx setup to rtl_fm?receiving AM radio station on UHF frequencyTurn 75 Ω TV “Rabbit Ears” with a balun into a 50 Ω dipole antennaIs it possible to make antenna for one specific frequency?Using LMR400 and RG8x in the same feedlineWhat is the best type of feedline for a base UHF VHF ground plane antenna with a distance of around 50-75 feet of coax?Weakly directive VHF/UHF antenna
Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?
Why do candidates not quit if they no longer have a realistic chance to win in the 2020 US presidents election
What made Windows ME so crash-prone?
FPGA CPU's, how to find the max speed?
Sending a photo of my bank account card to the future employer
Is there a good program to play chess online in ubuntu?
I have accepted an internship offer. Should I inform companies I have applied to that have not gotten back to me yet?
What alternatives exist to at-will employment?
Will it hurt my career to work as a graphic designer in a startup for beauty and skin care?
How to change checkbox react correctly?
Why don't commercial aircraft adopt a slightly more seaplane-like design to allow safer ditching in case of emergency?
A scene of Jimmy diversity
What's the meaning of こそ in this sentence?
What systems of robust steganography are out there?
Draw a line nicely around notes
Why limit to revolvers?
Why does FFmpeg choose 10+20+20 ms instead of an even 16 ms for 60 fps GIF images?
How to get bold version of blackboard bold fonts?
If a player tries to persuade somebody, what should that creature roll not to be persuaded?
How could an animal "smell" carbon monoxide?
What exactly is a Hadouken?
Mathematica function equivalent to Matlab's residue function (partial fraction expansion)
Manually select/unselect lines before forwarding to stdout
What are some symbols representing peasants/oppressed persons fighting back?
VHF 50 Ω Antenna Over 75 Ω TV Coax
What should I look for in an antenna for a DVBT Dongle used for SDR?While backpacking, is it worth mounting the antenna to the backpack frame (above my head)?Understanding coax radiation and “current on the shield”Transposing gqrx setup to rtl_fm?receiving AM radio station on UHF frequencyTurn 75 Ω TV “Rabbit Ears” with a balun into a 50 Ω dipole antennaIs it possible to make antenna for one specific frequency?Using LMR400 and RG8x in the same feedlineWhat is the best type of feedline for a base UHF VHF ground plane antenna with a distance of around 50-75 feet of coax?Weakly directive VHF/UHF antenna
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have a 50 Ω VHF airband antenna which I’m planning to install in my loft, for use with a RaspberryPi-based RTLSDR scanner/receiver.
I already have a UK-standard UHF/Freeview antenna using standard 75 Ω coaxial cabling running from the loft into the lounge and want to make use of this rather than running new cable.
I am not planning on transmitting on the VHF band, and the antenna will only be used for receiving/monitoring UK airband traffic.
Am I correct in thinking that:
Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
vhf uhf coaxial-cable antenna-system rtl-sdr
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a 50 Ω VHF airband antenna which I’m planning to install in my loft, for use with a RaspberryPi-based RTLSDR scanner/receiver.
I already have a UK-standard UHF/Freeview antenna using standard 75 Ω coaxial cabling running from the loft into the lounge and want to make use of this rather than running new cable.
I am not planning on transmitting on the VHF band, and the antenna will only be used for receiving/monitoring UK airband traffic.
Am I correct in thinking that:
Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
vhf uhf coaxial-cable antenna-system rtl-sdr
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a 50 Ω VHF airband antenna which I’m planning to install in my loft, for use with a RaspberryPi-based RTLSDR scanner/receiver.
I already have a UK-standard UHF/Freeview antenna using standard 75 Ω coaxial cabling running from the loft into the lounge and want to make use of this rather than running new cable.
I am not planning on transmitting on the VHF band, and the antenna will only be used for receiving/monitoring UK airband traffic.
Am I correct in thinking that:
Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
vhf uhf coaxial-cable antenna-system rtl-sdr
$endgroup$
I have a 50 Ω VHF airband antenna which I’m planning to install in my loft, for use with a RaspberryPi-based RTLSDR scanner/receiver.
I already have a UK-standard UHF/Freeview antenna using standard 75 Ω coaxial cabling running from the loft into the lounge and want to make use of this rather than running new cable.
I am not planning on transmitting on the VHF band, and the antenna will only be used for receiving/monitoring UK airband traffic.
Am I correct in thinking that:
Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
vhf uhf coaxial-cable antenna-system rtl-sdr
vhf uhf coaxial-cable antenna-system rtl-sdr
edited Jul 7 at 21:46
Mike Waters♦
4,2982 gold badges6 silver badges35 bronze badges
4,2982 gold badges6 silver badges35 bronze badges
asked Jul 7 at 13:40
Craig WatsonCraig Watson
1135 bronze badges
1135 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
- I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
Yes, this is correct.
A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.
- Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.
- The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.
A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle♦
Jul 8 at 7:57
1
$begingroup$
@ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO♦
Jul 8 at 13:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To answer your questions in order:
- As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already
- Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)
- Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14864%2fvhf-50-%25ce%25a9-antenna-over-75-%25ce%25a9-tv-coax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
- I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
Yes, this is correct.
A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.
- Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.
- The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.
A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle♦
Jul 8 at 7:57
1
$begingroup$
@ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO♦
Jul 8 at 13:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
Yes, this is correct.
A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.
- Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.
- The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.
A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle♦
Jul 8 at 7:57
1
$begingroup$
@ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO♦
Jul 8 at 13:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
Yes, this is correct.
A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.
- Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.
- The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.
A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.
$endgroup$
- I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna
Yes, this is correct.
A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.
- Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only
This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.
- The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable
Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.
A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.
edited Jul 8 at 13:59
answered Jul 7 at 14:27
Kevin Reid AG6YO♦Kevin Reid AG6YO
17.6k4 gold badges35 silver badges77 bronze badges
17.6k4 gold badges35 silver badges77 bronze badges
$begingroup$
When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle♦
Jul 8 at 7:57
1
$begingroup$
@ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO♦
Jul 8 at 13:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle♦
Jul 8 at 7:57
1
$begingroup$
@ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO♦
Jul 8 at 13:56
$begingroup$
When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle♦
Jul 8 at 7:57
$begingroup$
When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
$endgroup$
– Scott Earle♦
Jul 8 at 7:57
1
1
$begingroup$
@ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO♦
Jul 8 at 13:56
$begingroup$
@ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Reid AG6YO♦
Jul 8 at 13:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To answer your questions in order:
- As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already
- Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)
- Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To answer your questions in order:
- As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already
- Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)
- Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To answer your questions in order:
- As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already
- Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)
- Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable
$endgroup$
To answer your questions in order:
- As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already
- Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)
- Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable
answered Jul 7 at 14:26
Scott Earle♦Scott Earle
2,8981 gold badge10 silver badges23 bronze badges
2,8981 gold badge10 silver badges23 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)
$endgroup$
For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)
answered Jul 10 at 0:02
sm5bszsm5bsz
5712 silver badges3 bronze badges
5712 silver badges3 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14864%2fvhf-50-%25ce%25a9-antenna-over-75-%25ce%25a9-tv-coax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown