VHF 50 Ω Antenna Over 75 Ω TV CoaxWhat should I look for in an antenna for a DVBT Dongle used for SDR?While backpacking, is it worth mounting the antenna to the backpack frame (above my head)?Understanding coax radiation and “current on the shield”Transposing gqrx setup to rtl_fm?receiving AM radio station on UHF frequencyTurn 75 Ω TV “Rabbit Ears” with a balun into a 50 Ω dipole antennaIs it possible to make antenna for one specific frequency?Using LMR400 and RG8x in the same feedlineWhat is the best type of feedline for a base UHF VHF ground plane antenna with a distance of around 50-75 feet of coax?Weakly directive VHF/UHF antenna

Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?

Why do candidates not quit if they no longer have a realistic chance to win in the 2020 US presidents election

What made Windows ME so crash-prone?

FPGA CPU's, how to find the max speed?

Sending a photo of my bank account card to the future employer

Is there a good program to play chess online in ubuntu?

I have accepted an internship offer. Should I inform companies I have applied to that have not gotten back to me yet?

What alternatives exist to at-will employment?

Will it hurt my career to work as a graphic designer in a startup for beauty and skin care?

How to change checkbox react correctly?

Why don't commercial aircraft adopt a slightly more seaplane-like design to allow safer ditching in case of emergency?

A scene of Jimmy diversity

What's the meaning of こそ in this sentence?

What systems of robust steganography are out there?

Draw a line nicely around notes

Why limit to revolvers?

Why does FFmpeg choose 10+20+20 ms instead of an even 16 ms for 60 fps GIF images?

How to get bold version of blackboard bold fonts?

If a player tries to persuade somebody, what should that creature roll not to be persuaded?

How could an animal "smell" carbon monoxide?

What exactly is a Hadouken?

Mathematica function equivalent to Matlab's residue function (partial fraction expansion)

Manually select/unselect lines before forwarding to stdout

What are some symbols representing peasants/oppressed persons fighting back?



VHF 50 Ω Antenna Over 75 Ω TV Coax


What should I look for in an antenna for a DVBT Dongle used for SDR?While backpacking, is it worth mounting the antenna to the backpack frame (above my head)?Understanding coax radiation and “current on the shield”Transposing gqrx setup to rtl_fm?receiving AM radio station on UHF frequencyTurn 75 Ω TV “Rabbit Ears” with a balun into a 50 Ω dipole antennaIs it possible to make antenna for one specific frequency?Using LMR400 and RG8x in the same feedlineWhat is the best type of feedline for a base UHF VHF ground plane antenna with a distance of around 50-75 feet of coax?Weakly directive VHF/UHF antenna






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


I have a 50 Ω VHF airband antenna which I’m planning to install in my loft, for use with a RaspberryPi-based RTLSDR scanner/receiver.



I already have a UK-standard UHF/Freeview antenna using standard 75 Ω coaxial cabling running from the loft into the lounge and want to make use of this rather than running new cable.



I am not planning on transmitting on the VHF band, and the antenna will only be used for receiving/monitoring UK airband traffic.



Am I correct in thinking that:



  • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only


  • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna


  • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    2












    $begingroup$


    I have a 50 Ω VHF airband antenna which I’m planning to install in my loft, for use with a RaspberryPi-based RTLSDR scanner/receiver.



    I already have a UK-standard UHF/Freeview antenna using standard 75 Ω coaxial cabling running from the loft into the lounge and want to make use of this rather than running new cable.



    I am not planning on transmitting on the VHF band, and the antenna will only be used for receiving/monitoring UK airband traffic.



    Am I correct in thinking that:



    • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only


    • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna


    • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I have a 50 Ω VHF airband antenna which I’m planning to install in my loft, for use with a RaspberryPi-based RTLSDR scanner/receiver.



      I already have a UK-standard UHF/Freeview antenna using standard 75 Ω coaxial cabling running from the loft into the lounge and want to make use of this rather than running new cable.



      I am not planning on transmitting on the VHF band, and the antenna will only be used for receiving/monitoring UK airband traffic.



      Am I correct in thinking that:



      • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only


      • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna


      • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have a 50 Ω VHF airband antenna which I’m planning to install in my loft, for use with a RaspberryPi-based RTLSDR scanner/receiver.



      I already have a UK-standard UHF/Freeview antenna using standard 75 Ω coaxial cabling running from the loft into the lounge and want to make use of this rather than running new cable.



      I am not planning on transmitting on the VHF band, and the antenna will only be used for receiving/monitoring UK airband traffic.



      Am I correct in thinking that:



      • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only


      • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna


      • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable







      vhf uhf coaxial-cable antenna-system rtl-sdr






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jul 7 at 21:46









      Mike Waters

      4,2982 gold badges6 silver badges35 bronze badges




      4,2982 gold badges6 silver badges35 bronze badges










      asked Jul 7 at 13:40









      Craig WatsonCraig Watson

      1135 bronze badges




      1135 bronze badges




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$


          • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna



          Yes, this is correct.



          A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.




          • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only



          This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.




          • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable



          Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.



          A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
            $endgroup$
            – Scott Earle
            Jul 8 at 7:57






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
            $endgroup$
            – Kevin Reid AG6YO
            Jul 8 at 13:56



















          3












          $begingroup$

          To answer your questions in order:



          • As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already

          • Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)

          • Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
              StackExchange.schematics.init();
              );
              , "cicuitlab");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "520"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14864%2fvhf-50-%25ce%25a9-antenna-over-75-%25ce%25a9-tv-coax%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              7












              $begingroup$


              • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna



              Yes, this is correct.



              A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.




              • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only



              This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.




              • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable



              Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.



              A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
                $endgroup$
                – Scott Earle
                Jul 8 at 7:57






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
                $endgroup$
                – Kevin Reid AG6YO
                Jul 8 at 13:56
















              7












              $begingroup$


              • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna



              Yes, this is correct.



              A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.




              • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only



              This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.




              • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable



              Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.



              A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
                $endgroup$
                – Scott Earle
                Jul 8 at 7:57






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
                $endgroup$
                – Kevin Reid AG6YO
                Jul 8 at 13:56














              7












              7








              7





              $begingroup$


              • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna



              Yes, this is correct.



              A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.




              • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only



              This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.




              • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable



              Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.



              A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$




              • I will need a UHF/VHF diplexer on either end to suitably merge/split the signals from each antenna



              Yes, this is correct.



              A tangent: If you wanted to save some money by using mass-market parts, you could use 75 Ω power dividers (coax splitters) instead of diplexers. This has 3 dB loss because the signals are not directed exclusively to the intended receivers for each band, but evenly split between them.




              • Running two antennae for two diverse frequency bands across the same coax is OK, providing that both antennae are RX only



              This type of configuration can work for transmitting as well, provided the diplexers are rated for the transmit power and the receivers can tolerate the leakage through the wrong port of the diplexer.




              • The loss resulting from using a 50 Ω antenna and a 75 Ω antenna/cable is negligible enough to make the setup viable



              Yes, this is correct, unless you are seeking to receive extremely weak signals.



              A 75-50 Ω mismatch has a reflection coefficient of 0.2. That is, each point of mismatch will reflect 20% of the signal, or $10log_10(1 - 0.2) approx 0.96,textdB$. So (discounting secondary reflections), you'll have a total loss of 2 dB. That will most likely be fine.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jul 8 at 13:59

























              answered Jul 7 at 14:27









              Kevin Reid AG6YOKevin Reid AG6YO

              17.6k4 gold badges35 silver badges77 bronze badges




              17.6k4 gold badges35 silver badges77 bronze badges











              • $begingroup$
                When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
                $endgroup$
                – Scott Earle
                Jul 8 at 7:57






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
                $endgroup$
                – Kevin Reid AG6YO
                Jul 8 at 13:56

















              • $begingroup$
                When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
                $endgroup$
                – Scott Earle
                Jul 8 at 7:57






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
                $endgroup$
                – Kevin Reid AG6YO
                Jul 8 at 13:56
















              $begingroup$
              When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
              $endgroup$
              – Scott Earle
              Jul 8 at 7:57




              $begingroup$
              When you say "power dividers", I think you mean "signal dividers" and not those things that allow you to put DC (i.e. 'power') on the coax as well as signal, separating the DC from the signal at the other end, usually used to power a masthead amplifier or similar ...
              $endgroup$
              – Scott Earle
              Jul 8 at 7:57




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              @ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
              $endgroup$
              – Kevin Reid AG6YO
              Jul 8 at 13:56





              $begingroup$
              @ScottEarle "Power divider" is the correct term. The thing you are thinking of is a bias tee.
              $endgroup$
              – Kevin Reid AG6YO
              Jul 8 at 13:56














              3












              $begingroup$

              To answer your questions in order:



              • As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already

              • Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)

              • Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable





              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                To answer your questions in order:



                • As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already

                • Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)

                • Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable





                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  To answer your questions in order:



                  • As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already

                  • Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)

                  • Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable





                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  To answer your questions in order:



                  • As long as you’re not transmitting, you can run as many signals as you want into a piece of coax. In fact, your receiving antenna is passing a whole band of frequencies into it already

                  • Ideally you would want a combiner at one end and a splitter at the other. These can be passive (a few coils and a capacitor or two), or active (with some electronics in, and power being supplied)

                  • Certainly for receive, you won’t notice anything from using 75ohm instead of 50ohm cable






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jul 7 at 14:26









                  Scott EarleScott Earle

                  2,8981 gold badge10 silver badges23 bronze badges




                  2,8981 gold badge10 silver badges23 bronze badges





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          For ultimate receive performance you would need a LNA at the antenna for UHF to avoid the losses of the coax and to improve the system noise figure. A LNA for VHF would not hurt (probably) and then you could use simple T-connectors to send the outputs through the same 70 ohm cable without loss of S/N. A receive only system is by far easier than a RX/TX system :-)







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Jul 10 at 0:02









                          sm5bszsm5bsz

                          5712 silver badges3 bronze badges




                          5712 silver badges3 bronze badges



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14864%2fvhf-50-%25ce%25a9-antenna-over-75-%25ce%25a9-tv-coax%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                              Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                              Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?