What caused the flashes in the video footage of Chernobyl?What is the reason behind choosing the specific elements used for the synthesis of heavier elements?Why are the masses of atoms less than the sum of their subatomic particles?Is iron the most stable element in the periodic table?How does beta decay increases the stabilization of the nuclei?As an atom get's bigger (on increasing atomic no.) , electrons have to move faster and faster around the nucleus, Why?Which element has the highest binding energy per nucleonNuclear Fusion and the worlds water supplyNuclear equations for the decay of radon-222 to lead-206What makes an isotope stable?
Why AI became applicable only after Nvidia's chips were available?
Party going through airport security at separate times?
What exactly is a "murder hobo"?
Why does Trump want a citizenship question on the census?
When I press the space bar it deletes the letters in front of it
How do I explain that I don't want to maintain old projects?
Estimates on number of topologies on a finite set
Is there a method for differentiating informative comments from commented out code?
Why is a mixture of two normally distributed variables only bimodal if their means differ by at least two times the common standard deviation?
Computer name naming convention for security
Is it possible to complete a PhD in CS in 3 years?
How was the Shuttle loaded and unloaded from its carrier aircraft?
Hail hit my roof. Do I need to replace it?
VHDL: is there a way to create an entity into which constants can be passed?
Possible arithmetic sequences of four integers 1-100
Why different specifications for telescopes and binoculars?
Do injective, yet not bijective, functions have an inverse?
Why is the Cauchy Distribution is so useful?
Is it better in terms of durability to remove card+battery or to connect to charger/computer via USB-C?
Why won't the U.S. sign a peace treaty with North Korea?
Is this Cambridge Dictionary example of "felicitate" valid?
Did Rabbi Akiva accept arguments from ignorance?
Why does the Antonov AN-225 not have any winglets?
Conditions for Roots of a quadratic equation at infinity
What caused the flashes in the video footage of Chernobyl?
What is the reason behind choosing the specific elements used for the synthesis of heavier elements?Why are the masses of atoms less than the sum of their subatomic particles?Is iron the most stable element in the periodic table?How does beta decay increases the stabilization of the nuclei?As an atom get's bigger (on increasing atomic no.) , electrons have to move faster and faster around the nucleus, Why?Which element has the highest binding energy per nucleonNuclear Fusion and the worlds water supplyNuclear equations for the decay of radon-222 to lead-206What makes an isotope stable?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
There is video footage of nearby villages in Pripyat, in the first week after the Chernobyl disaster. When I watch it there are villagers leading normal lives in normal clothing. Some Russian nuclear scientists pass by in full radioactive suits. Then there these clearly visible "flashes" in the air; I have looked on youtube but haven't found the video that I watched a long time ago. My layperson understanding is that these flashes are caused by an extreme amount of radiation.
Here's footage that shows the flashes in the air. They are subtle orangish flashes that are quick. But there's one for instance just after 3 minutes.
This isn't the original one that showed the flashes better. Anyway:
Chernobyl
From Wikipedia "Ionized-air glow":
Within minutes after the steam explosion that caused the Chernobyl
accident at 01:23 local time, a number of employees at the power
station went outside to get a clearer view of the extent of the
damage. One such survivor, Alexander Yuvchenko, recounts that once he
stopped outside and looked up towards the reactor hall he saw a "very
beautiful" LASER-like beam of light bluish light, caused by the
ionization of air, that appeared to flood up into infinity.
My questions are:
What amount of radioactive material is needed to make those flashes in the air happen?
Is radiation alone enough?
Are other factors such as weather, temperature or other prior chemical elements in the air needed to allow this flashing to happen?
nuclear-chemistry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is video footage of nearby villages in Pripyat, in the first week after the Chernobyl disaster. When I watch it there are villagers leading normal lives in normal clothing. Some Russian nuclear scientists pass by in full radioactive suits. Then there these clearly visible "flashes" in the air; I have looked on youtube but haven't found the video that I watched a long time ago. My layperson understanding is that these flashes are caused by an extreme amount of radiation.
Here's footage that shows the flashes in the air. They are subtle orangish flashes that are quick. But there's one for instance just after 3 minutes.
This isn't the original one that showed the flashes better. Anyway:
Chernobyl
From Wikipedia "Ionized-air glow":
Within minutes after the steam explosion that caused the Chernobyl
accident at 01:23 local time, a number of employees at the power
station went outside to get a clearer view of the extent of the
damage. One such survivor, Alexander Yuvchenko, recounts that once he
stopped outside and looked up towards the reactor hall he saw a "very
beautiful" LASER-like beam of light bluish light, caused by the
ionization of air, that appeared to flood up into infinity.
My questions are:
What amount of radioactive material is needed to make those flashes in the air happen?
Is radiation alone enough?
Are other factors such as weather, temperature or other prior chemical elements in the air needed to allow this flashing to happen?
nuclear-chemistry
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Loong♦
Jun 30 at 10:32
3
$begingroup$
I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
$endgroup$
– Paul
Jul 1 at 14:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is video footage of nearby villages in Pripyat, in the first week after the Chernobyl disaster. When I watch it there are villagers leading normal lives in normal clothing. Some Russian nuclear scientists pass by in full radioactive suits. Then there these clearly visible "flashes" in the air; I have looked on youtube but haven't found the video that I watched a long time ago. My layperson understanding is that these flashes are caused by an extreme amount of radiation.
Here's footage that shows the flashes in the air. They are subtle orangish flashes that are quick. But there's one for instance just after 3 minutes.
This isn't the original one that showed the flashes better. Anyway:
Chernobyl
From Wikipedia "Ionized-air glow":
Within minutes after the steam explosion that caused the Chernobyl
accident at 01:23 local time, a number of employees at the power
station went outside to get a clearer view of the extent of the
damage. One such survivor, Alexander Yuvchenko, recounts that once he
stopped outside and looked up towards the reactor hall he saw a "very
beautiful" LASER-like beam of light bluish light, caused by the
ionization of air, that appeared to flood up into infinity.
My questions are:
What amount of radioactive material is needed to make those flashes in the air happen?
Is radiation alone enough?
Are other factors such as weather, temperature or other prior chemical elements in the air needed to allow this flashing to happen?
nuclear-chemistry
$endgroup$
There is video footage of nearby villages in Pripyat, in the first week after the Chernobyl disaster. When I watch it there are villagers leading normal lives in normal clothing. Some Russian nuclear scientists pass by in full radioactive suits. Then there these clearly visible "flashes" in the air; I have looked on youtube but haven't found the video that I watched a long time ago. My layperson understanding is that these flashes are caused by an extreme amount of radiation.
Here's footage that shows the flashes in the air. They are subtle orangish flashes that are quick. But there's one for instance just after 3 minutes.
This isn't the original one that showed the flashes better. Anyway:
Chernobyl
From Wikipedia "Ionized-air glow":
Within minutes after the steam explosion that caused the Chernobyl
accident at 01:23 local time, a number of employees at the power
station went outside to get a clearer view of the extent of the
damage. One such survivor, Alexander Yuvchenko, recounts that once he
stopped outside and looked up towards the reactor hall he saw a "very
beautiful" LASER-like beam of light bluish light, caused by the
ionization of air, that appeared to flood up into infinity.
My questions are:
What amount of radioactive material is needed to make those flashes in the air happen?
Is radiation alone enough?
Are other factors such as weather, temperature or other prior chemical elements in the air needed to allow this flashing to happen?
nuclear-chemistry
nuclear-chemistry
edited Jun 30 at 13:37
Nilay Ghosh
9,94910 gold badges46 silver badges111 bronze badges
9,94910 gold badges46 silver badges111 bronze badges
asked Jun 30 at 6:34
Snack_Food_TermiteSnack_Food_Termite
2622 silver badges7 bronze badges
2622 silver badges7 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Loong♦
Jun 30 at 10:32
3
$begingroup$
I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
$endgroup$
– Paul
Jul 1 at 14:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Loong♦
Jun 30 at 10:32
3
$begingroup$
I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
$endgroup$
– Paul
Jul 1 at 14:12
$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Loong♦
Jun 30 at 10:32
$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Loong♦
Jun 30 at 10:32
3
3
$begingroup$
I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
$endgroup$
– Paul
Jul 1 at 14:12
$begingroup$
I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
$endgroup$
– Paul
Jul 1 at 14:12
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)

There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.
The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.
The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117498%2fwhat-caused-the-flashes-in-the-video-footage-of-chernobyl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)

There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.
The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.
The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)

There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.
The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.
The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)

There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.
The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.
The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.
$endgroup$
The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)

There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.
The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.
The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.
edited Jun 30 at 18:38
answered Jun 30 at 8:56
Loong♦Loong
36.1k8 gold badges91 silver badges193 bronze badges
36.1k8 gold badges91 silver badges193 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117498%2fwhat-caused-the-flashes-in-the-video-footage-of-chernobyl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Loong♦
Jun 30 at 10:32
3
$begingroup$
I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
$endgroup$
– Paul
Jul 1 at 14:12