What caused the flashes in the video footage of Chernobyl?What is the reason behind choosing the specific elements used for the synthesis of heavier elements?Why are the masses of atoms less than the sum of their subatomic particles?Is iron the most stable element in the periodic table?How does beta decay increases the stabilization of the nuclei?As an atom get's bigger (on increasing atomic no.) , electrons have to move faster and faster around the nucleus, Why?Which element has the highest binding energy per nucleonNuclear Fusion and the worlds water supplyNuclear equations for the decay of radon-222 to lead-206What makes an isotope stable?

Why AI became applicable only after Nvidia's chips were available?

Party going through airport security at separate times?

What exactly is a "murder hobo"?

Why does Trump want a citizenship question on the census?

When I press the space bar it deletes the letters in front of it

How do I explain that I don't want to maintain old projects?

Estimates on number of topologies on a finite set

Is there a method for differentiating informative comments from commented out code?

Why is a mixture of two normally distributed variables only bimodal if their means differ by at least two times the common standard deviation?

Computer name naming convention for security

Is it possible to complete a PhD in CS in 3 years?

How was the Shuttle loaded and unloaded from its carrier aircraft?

Hail hit my roof. Do I need to replace it?

VHDL: is there a way to create an entity into which constants can be passed?

Possible arithmetic sequences of four integers 1-100

Why different specifications for telescopes and binoculars?

Do injective, yet not bijective, functions have an inverse?

Why is the Cauchy Distribution is so useful?

Is it better in terms of durability to remove card+battery or to connect to charger/computer via USB-C?

Why won't the U.S. sign a peace treaty with North Korea?

Is this Cambridge Dictionary example of "felicitate" valid?

Did Rabbi Akiva accept arguments from ignorance?

Why does the Antonov AN-225 not have any winglets?

Conditions for Roots of a quadratic equation at infinity



What caused the flashes in the video footage of Chernobyl?


What is the reason behind choosing the specific elements used for the synthesis of heavier elements?Why are the masses of atoms less than the sum of their subatomic particles?Is iron the most stable element in the periodic table?How does beta decay increases the stabilization of the nuclei?As an atom get's bigger (on increasing atomic no.) , electrons have to move faster and faster around the nucleus, Why?Which element has the highest binding energy per nucleonNuclear Fusion and the worlds water supplyNuclear equations for the decay of radon-222 to lead-206What makes an isotope stable?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








27












$begingroup$


There is video footage of nearby villages in Pripyat, in the first week after the Chernobyl disaster. When I watch it there are villagers leading normal lives in normal clothing. Some Russian nuclear scientists pass by in full radioactive suits. Then there these clearly visible "flashes" in the air; I have looked on youtube but haven't found the video that I watched a long time ago. My layperson understanding is that these flashes are caused by an extreme amount of radiation.



Here's footage that shows the flashes in the air. They are subtle orangish flashes that are quick. But there's one for instance just after 3 minutes.
This isn't the original one that showed the flashes better. Anyway:
Chernobyl



From Wikipedia "Ionized-air glow":




Within minutes after the steam explosion that caused the Chernobyl
accident at 01:23 local time, a number of employees at the power
station went outside to get a clearer view of the extent of the
damage. One such survivor, Alexander Yuvchenko, recounts that once he
stopped outside and looked up towards the reactor hall he saw a "very
beautiful" LASER-like beam of light bluish light, caused by the
ionization of air, that appeared to flood up into infinity.




My questions are:



  • What amount of radioactive material is needed to make those flashes in the air happen?


  • Is radiation alone enough?


  • Are other factors such as weather, temperature or other prior chemical elements in the air needed to allow this flashing to happen?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    Jun 30 at 10:32






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Jul 1 at 14:12

















27












$begingroup$


There is video footage of nearby villages in Pripyat, in the first week after the Chernobyl disaster. When I watch it there are villagers leading normal lives in normal clothing. Some Russian nuclear scientists pass by in full radioactive suits. Then there these clearly visible "flashes" in the air; I have looked on youtube but haven't found the video that I watched a long time ago. My layperson understanding is that these flashes are caused by an extreme amount of radiation.



Here's footage that shows the flashes in the air. They are subtle orangish flashes that are quick. But there's one for instance just after 3 minutes.
This isn't the original one that showed the flashes better. Anyway:
Chernobyl



From Wikipedia "Ionized-air glow":




Within minutes after the steam explosion that caused the Chernobyl
accident at 01:23 local time, a number of employees at the power
station went outside to get a clearer view of the extent of the
damage. One such survivor, Alexander Yuvchenko, recounts that once he
stopped outside and looked up towards the reactor hall he saw a "very
beautiful" LASER-like beam of light bluish light, caused by the
ionization of air, that appeared to flood up into infinity.




My questions are:



  • What amount of radioactive material is needed to make those flashes in the air happen?


  • Is radiation alone enough?


  • Are other factors such as weather, temperature or other prior chemical elements in the air needed to allow this flashing to happen?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    Jun 30 at 10:32






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Jul 1 at 14:12













27












27








27





$begingroup$


There is video footage of nearby villages in Pripyat, in the first week after the Chernobyl disaster. When I watch it there are villagers leading normal lives in normal clothing. Some Russian nuclear scientists pass by in full radioactive suits. Then there these clearly visible "flashes" in the air; I have looked on youtube but haven't found the video that I watched a long time ago. My layperson understanding is that these flashes are caused by an extreme amount of radiation.



Here's footage that shows the flashes in the air. They are subtle orangish flashes that are quick. But there's one for instance just after 3 minutes.
This isn't the original one that showed the flashes better. Anyway:
Chernobyl



From Wikipedia "Ionized-air glow":




Within minutes after the steam explosion that caused the Chernobyl
accident at 01:23 local time, a number of employees at the power
station went outside to get a clearer view of the extent of the
damage. One such survivor, Alexander Yuvchenko, recounts that once he
stopped outside and looked up towards the reactor hall he saw a "very
beautiful" LASER-like beam of light bluish light, caused by the
ionization of air, that appeared to flood up into infinity.




My questions are:



  • What amount of radioactive material is needed to make those flashes in the air happen?


  • Is radiation alone enough?


  • Are other factors such as weather, temperature or other prior chemical elements in the air needed to allow this flashing to happen?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




There is video footage of nearby villages in Pripyat, in the first week after the Chernobyl disaster. When I watch it there are villagers leading normal lives in normal clothing. Some Russian nuclear scientists pass by in full radioactive suits. Then there these clearly visible "flashes" in the air; I have looked on youtube but haven't found the video that I watched a long time ago. My layperson understanding is that these flashes are caused by an extreme amount of radiation.



Here's footage that shows the flashes in the air. They are subtle orangish flashes that are quick. But there's one for instance just after 3 minutes.
This isn't the original one that showed the flashes better. Anyway:
Chernobyl



From Wikipedia "Ionized-air glow":




Within minutes after the steam explosion that caused the Chernobyl
accident at 01:23 local time, a number of employees at the power
station went outside to get a clearer view of the extent of the
damage. One such survivor, Alexander Yuvchenko, recounts that once he
stopped outside and looked up towards the reactor hall he saw a "very
beautiful" LASER-like beam of light bluish light, caused by the
ionization of air, that appeared to flood up into infinity.




My questions are:



  • What amount of radioactive material is needed to make those flashes in the air happen?


  • Is radiation alone enough?


  • Are other factors such as weather, temperature or other prior chemical elements in the air needed to allow this flashing to happen?







nuclear-chemistry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 30 at 13:37









Nilay Ghosh

9,94910 gold badges46 silver badges111 bronze badges




9,94910 gold badges46 silver badges111 bronze badges










asked Jun 30 at 6:34









Snack_Food_TermiteSnack_Food_Termite

2622 silver badges7 bronze badges




2622 silver badges7 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    Jun 30 at 10:32






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Jul 1 at 14:12
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    Jun 30 at 10:32






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Jul 1 at 14:12















$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Loong
Jun 30 at 10:32




$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Loong
Jun 30 at 10:32




3




3




$begingroup$
I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
$endgroup$
– Paul
Jul 1 at 14:12




$begingroup$
I worked in the nuclear industry for many years. As with anyone else who works with radiation (scientists, x-ray personnel etc) , we wear film badges which basically were just pieces of photographic film in a lightproof envelope and in a plastic holder. Radiation partials cloud show up as tiny spots on the film so they just develop the film out your badge every few weeks and see how many spots are on it to guess how much exposure you have had. The blue glow and flashes though, are normally associated with very high levels of radiation and atoms which have been 'excited' glow as they return to
$endgroup$
– Paul
Jul 1 at 14:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















50












$begingroup$

The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)



enter image description here



There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.



The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.



The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "431"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117498%2fwhat-caused-the-flashes-in-the-video-footage-of-chernobyl%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    50












    $begingroup$

    The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)



    enter image description here



    There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.



    The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.



    The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      50












      $begingroup$

      The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)



      enter image description here



      There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.



      The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.



      The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        50












        50








        50





        $begingroup$

        The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)



        enter image description here



        There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.



        The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.



        The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The white flashes seen in the video are the result of radioactive contamination of the original film. Airborne radioactive particles were deposited onto the film and caused a local overexposure of the negative, quite similar to the historic experiment of Antoine Henri Becquerel. That's why the flashes only appear in individual spots in individual frames of the film. (This is also explained in the documentary The Battle of Chernobyl, which also contains these film excerpts.)



        enter image description here



        There was no corresponding visual phenomenon in the air that could be directly observed by people in Pripyat.



        The ambient dose rates measured in 26 locations in Pripyat on 26 April 1986 at noon (i.e. about the time when the film was recorded) were about 0.038–1.9 R/h (i.e. about 0.38–19 mGy/h; with a geometric mean of 2.4 mGy/h). Such dose rates cannot cause any directly visible effects in air.



        The flashes on the film are not related to any visual phenomenon that was caused by nuclear reactions, radiation, fire or other chemical reactions at the open reactor during the night of the accident.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jun 30 at 18:38

























        answered Jun 30 at 8:56









        LoongLoong

        36.1k8 gold badges91 silver badges193 bronze badges




        36.1k8 gold badges91 silver badges193 bronze badges



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117498%2fwhat-caused-the-flashes-in-the-video-footage-of-chernobyl%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Grendel Contents Story Scholarship Depictions Notes References Navigation menu10.1093/notesj/gjn112Berserkeree

            Area configuration aggregation error after install Porto themeMagento 2.1 CE Installed but front/backend not loading/workingCSS not loading on page within Magento 2 pageCannot install module in Magento 2no commands defined in the “setup” namespace. in Magento2Magento 2: Static files are present but shows 404Why do i have to always run the commands to clean cache in Magento 2.1.8?Failure reason: 'Unable to unserialize value.'Error 500 after magento migrationIn production mode the site does not loadMagento 2 : Error 500 after installing

            Middle Expansion Olielle Resaix Definition: Uttering songs of triumph shouting with joy triumphant exulting Sejunction Journal 붙다 달 고급 품목 외출 The stretch trades the screeching tin. Definition: The act of speaking with a drawl a drawl Cough Sand Definition: An uproar a quarrel a noisy outbreak Shake Iron Publicize Horse House Baby 사과 Resaix Flaggy Jelly Temporary Unequaled Puppet A drop in the bucket Shrew 성격 회원 성질 미팅 The burn frames the tacky quality. Materialistic The smoke reduces the way. Yammoe Nondescript Cheek 얼굴 배 약하다 날리다 타다 The illegal country shows the iron. Help Rule Drearien Smoke Teaching Meaty Wasp Abraham Lincoln Jaws 진심 수리하다 Size Cork Idea Convert Think Lark John Lennon 거울 청소 군 추천하다 아이스크림