Does Stone Golem skin count as “a point on a stone surface” for the Passwall spell?Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?Can a corpse that was never alive be raised or animated?What happens if the barrier of a Cube of Force collide with an Passwall spell? And with a Wall of Fire for a 2nd time?Is the ethical necromancer still viable in 5e?Does the spell erupting earth disrupt the surface it's cast on?Can the Contingency spell be used with a spell cast from an Ioun Stone?What happens to the caster of the Meld into Stone spell when the spell ends naturally?Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?Can you dispel the Slow effect of a Stone Golem?How much time does the “Restore Life” property of a Transmuter's stone take?
How do we improve collaboration with problematic tester team?
Why is there not a willingness from the world to step in between Pakistan and India?
Would Epic Heroism be an acceptable rule variant for a small, first-time group playing the Lost Mine of Phandelver adventure?
What are the IPSE’s, the ASPE’s, the FRIPSE’s and the GRIPSE’s?
rationalizing sieges in a modern/near-future setting
How to say "I only speak one which is English." in French?
Can’t change phone time - set automatic time grayed out
Why does matter stay collapsed in the core, following a supernova explosion?
Using a JoeBlow Sport pump on a presta valve
Finding square root without division and initial guess
Why did James Cameron decide to give Alita big eyes?
Did anybody find out it was Anakin who blew up the command center?
Dual of a bimodule
The term Feed-forward and its meaning?
How many petaflops does it take to land on the moon? What does Artemis need with an Aitken?
How to emphasise the insignificance of someone/thing – besides using "klein"
Why did Lucius make a deal out of Buckbeak hurting Draco but not about Draco being turned into a ferret?
How to prevent a hosting company from accessing a VM's encryption keys?
A first "Hangman" game in Python
To what extent should we fear giving offense?
Should I use the words "pyromancy" and "necromancy" even if they don't mean what people think they do?
Why is getting a PhD considered "financially irresponsible" by some people?
How do solar inverter systems easily add AC power sources together?
Why can't UK MPs vote for the Withdrawal Agreement, then renege on the backstop if it comes to that?
Does Stone Golem skin count as “a point on a stone surface” for the Passwall spell?
Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?Can a corpse that was never alive be raised or animated?What happens if the barrier of a Cube of Force collide with an Passwall spell? And with a Wall of Fire for a 2nd time?Is the ethical necromancer still viable in 5e?Does the spell erupting earth disrupt the surface it's cast on?Can the Contingency spell be used with a spell cast from an Ioun Stone?What happens to the caster of the Meld into Stone spell when the spell ends naturally?Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?Can you dispel the Slow effect of a Stone Golem?How much time does the “Restore Life” property of a Transmuter's stone take?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Is it possible to create a passwall through the Stone Golem body with the Passwall spell?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to create a passwall through the Stone Golem body with the Passwall spell?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to create a passwall through the Stone Golem body with the Passwall spell?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
Is it possible to create a passwall through the Stone Golem body with the Passwall spell?
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
edited Aug 15 at 0:12
Sdjz
23.2k6 gold badges112 silver badges170 bronze badges
23.2k6 gold badges112 silver badges170 bronze badges
asked Aug 14 at 21:19
OharOhar
8753 silver badges18 bronze badges
8753 silver badges18 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This should not work
The passwall spell states:
A passage appears at a point of your choice that you can see on a wooden, plaster, or stone surface (such as a wall, a ceiling, or a floor) within range, and lasts for the duration. You choose the opening's dimensions: up to 5 feet wide, 8 feet tall, and 20 feet deep. The passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it.
Fifth edition uses natural language (standard English) when describing things so it is left to us to rule what a "surface" is. Lexico defines "surface" as:
The outside part or uppermost layer of something.
So very technically it would seem that a Stone Golem would work, however the spell lists examples of surfaces "walls, ceilings, floors" these are very similar surfaces and they are all objects, not creatures. If the spell wanted creatures to be included as an option it would have said so.
Another thing that I believe is true is that surfaces simply have to objects (I wouldn't naturally call a living thing a surface). The spell does not explicitly state the the surface cannot be a creature but I believe this is implied regardless and so you could not target a Stone Golem with the passwall spell.
This is further supported by the Q/A "Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?", where Jeremy Crawford's tweet (a good source of Rules As Intended) is quoted:
Meld into Stone affects only the caster and the stone the caster touches. If a spell allows you to target others, it defines for you whom you can target.
He has also said in this tweet:
The meld into stone spell works on a stone object or a stone surface, like a wall, floor, or ceiling. An elemental or a golem is a creature, not an object, wall, floor, or ceiling
This supports the idea that a Stone Golem does not count as a surface. The passwall and meld into stone spells use the same wording and so the same logic/idea would apply.
The passwall spell (very likely RAW and definitely RAI) cannot work on a Stone Golem, or any creature for that matter.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
An alternate interpretation is that it works but doesn't do anything useful, since "the passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it." You just turn an angry stone golem into an equally angry donut-shaped stone golem.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Aug 15 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson Arguably it would allow you to walk through the creature's space though... Ultimately the effects of a Stone Golem having a giant hole on them but that can still balance would be left to a GM. I'll probably add that to my answer later
$endgroup$
– Medix2
Aug 15 at 2:37
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153547%2fdoes-stone-golem-skin-count-as-a-point-on-a-stone-surface-for-the-passwall-spe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This should not work
The passwall spell states:
A passage appears at a point of your choice that you can see on a wooden, plaster, or stone surface (such as a wall, a ceiling, or a floor) within range, and lasts for the duration. You choose the opening's dimensions: up to 5 feet wide, 8 feet tall, and 20 feet deep. The passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it.
Fifth edition uses natural language (standard English) when describing things so it is left to us to rule what a "surface" is. Lexico defines "surface" as:
The outside part or uppermost layer of something.
So very technically it would seem that a Stone Golem would work, however the spell lists examples of surfaces "walls, ceilings, floors" these are very similar surfaces and they are all objects, not creatures. If the spell wanted creatures to be included as an option it would have said so.
Another thing that I believe is true is that surfaces simply have to objects (I wouldn't naturally call a living thing a surface). The spell does not explicitly state the the surface cannot be a creature but I believe this is implied regardless and so you could not target a Stone Golem with the passwall spell.
This is further supported by the Q/A "Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?", where Jeremy Crawford's tweet (a good source of Rules As Intended) is quoted:
Meld into Stone affects only the caster and the stone the caster touches. If a spell allows you to target others, it defines for you whom you can target.
He has also said in this tweet:
The meld into stone spell works on a stone object or a stone surface, like a wall, floor, or ceiling. An elemental or a golem is a creature, not an object, wall, floor, or ceiling
This supports the idea that a Stone Golem does not count as a surface. The passwall and meld into stone spells use the same wording and so the same logic/idea would apply.
The passwall spell (very likely RAW and definitely RAI) cannot work on a Stone Golem, or any creature for that matter.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
An alternate interpretation is that it works but doesn't do anything useful, since "the passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it." You just turn an angry stone golem into an equally angry donut-shaped stone golem.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Aug 15 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson Arguably it would allow you to walk through the creature's space though... Ultimately the effects of a Stone Golem having a giant hole on them but that can still balance would be left to a GM. I'll probably add that to my answer later
$endgroup$
– Medix2
Aug 15 at 2:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This should not work
The passwall spell states:
A passage appears at a point of your choice that you can see on a wooden, plaster, or stone surface (such as a wall, a ceiling, or a floor) within range, and lasts for the duration. You choose the opening's dimensions: up to 5 feet wide, 8 feet tall, and 20 feet deep. The passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it.
Fifth edition uses natural language (standard English) when describing things so it is left to us to rule what a "surface" is. Lexico defines "surface" as:
The outside part or uppermost layer of something.
So very technically it would seem that a Stone Golem would work, however the spell lists examples of surfaces "walls, ceilings, floors" these are very similar surfaces and they are all objects, not creatures. If the spell wanted creatures to be included as an option it would have said so.
Another thing that I believe is true is that surfaces simply have to objects (I wouldn't naturally call a living thing a surface). The spell does not explicitly state the the surface cannot be a creature but I believe this is implied regardless and so you could not target a Stone Golem with the passwall spell.
This is further supported by the Q/A "Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?", where Jeremy Crawford's tweet (a good source of Rules As Intended) is quoted:
Meld into Stone affects only the caster and the stone the caster touches. If a spell allows you to target others, it defines for you whom you can target.
He has also said in this tweet:
The meld into stone spell works on a stone object or a stone surface, like a wall, floor, or ceiling. An elemental or a golem is a creature, not an object, wall, floor, or ceiling
This supports the idea that a Stone Golem does not count as a surface. The passwall and meld into stone spells use the same wording and so the same logic/idea would apply.
The passwall spell (very likely RAW and definitely RAI) cannot work on a Stone Golem, or any creature for that matter.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
An alternate interpretation is that it works but doesn't do anything useful, since "the passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it." You just turn an angry stone golem into an equally angry donut-shaped stone golem.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Aug 15 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson Arguably it would allow you to walk through the creature's space though... Ultimately the effects of a Stone Golem having a giant hole on them but that can still balance would be left to a GM. I'll probably add that to my answer later
$endgroup$
– Medix2
Aug 15 at 2:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This should not work
The passwall spell states:
A passage appears at a point of your choice that you can see on a wooden, plaster, or stone surface (such as a wall, a ceiling, or a floor) within range, and lasts for the duration. You choose the opening's dimensions: up to 5 feet wide, 8 feet tall, and 20 feet deep. The passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it.
Fifth edition uses natural language (standard English) when describing things so it is left to us to rule what a "surface" is. Lexico defines "surface" as:
The outside part or uppermost layer of something.
So very technically it would seem that a Stone Golem would work, however the spell lists examples of surfaces "walls, ceilings, floors" these are very similar surfaces and they are all objects, not creatures. If the spell wanted creatures to be included as an option it would have said so.
Another thing that I believe is true is that surfaces simply have to objects (I wouldn't naturally call a living thing a surface). The spell does not explicitly state the the surface cannot be a creature but I believe this is implied regardless and so you could not target a Stone Golem with the passwall spell.
This is further supported by the Q/A "Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?", where Jeremy Crawford's tweet (a good source of Rules As Intended) is quoted:
Meld into Stone affects only the caster and the stone the caster touches. If a spell allows you to target others, it defines for you whom you can target.
He has also said in this tweet:
The meld into stone spell works on a stone object or a stone surface, like a wall, floor, or ceiling. An elemental or a golem is a creature, not an object, wall, floor, or ceiling
This supports the idea that a Stone Golem does not count as a surface. The passwall and meld into stone spells use the same wording and so the same logic/idea would apply.
The passwall spell (very likely RAW and definitely RAI) cannot work on a Stone Golem, or any creature for that matter.
$endgroup$
This should not work
The passwall spell states:
A passage appears at a point of your choice that you can see on a wooden, plaster, or stone surface (such as a wall, a ceiling, or a floor) within range, and lasts for the duration. You choose the opening's dimensions: up to 5 feet wide, 8 feet tall, and 20 feet deep. The passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it.
Fifth edition uses natural language (standard English) when describing things so it is left to us to rule what a "surface" is. Lexico defines "surface" as:
The outside part or uppermost layer of something.
So very technically it would seem that a Stone Golem would work, however the spell lists examples of surfaces "walls, ceilings, floors" these are very similar surfaces and they are all objects, not creatures. If the spell wanted creatures to be included as an option it would have said so.
Another thing that I believe is true is that surfaces simply have to objects (I wouldn't naturally call a living thing a surface). The spell does not explicitly state the the surface cannot be a creature but I believe this is implied regardless and so you could not target a Stone Golem with the passwall spell.
This is further supported by the Q/A "Can the Meld Into Stone spell be cast on someone else?", where Jeremy Crawford's tweet (a good source of Rules As Intended) is quoted:
Meld into Stone affects only the caster and the stone the caster touches. If a spell allows you to target others, it defines for you whom you can target.
He has also said in this tweet:
The meld into stone spell works on a stone object or a stone surface, like a wall, floor, or ceiling. An elemental or a golem is a creature, not an object, wall, floor, or ceiling
This supports the idea that a Stone Golem does not count as a surface. The passwall and meld into stone spells use the same wording and so the same logic/idea would apply.
The passwall spell (very likely RAW and definitely RAI) cannot work on a Stone Golem, or any creature for that matter.
edited Aug 15 at 7:41
V2Blast♦
34k5 gold badges123 silver badges212 bronze badges
34k5 gold badges123 silver badges212 bronze badges
answered Aug 14 at 21:33
Medix2Medix2
7,9602 gold badges22 silver badges85 bronze badges
7,9602 gold badges22 silver badges85 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
An alternate interpretation is that it works but doesn't do anything useful, since "the passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it." You just turn an angry stone golem into an equally angry donut-shaped stone golem.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Aug 15 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson Arguably it would allow you to walk through the creature's space though... Ultimately the effects of a Stone Golem having a giant hole on them but that can still balance would be left to a GM. I'll probably add that to my answer later
$endgroup$
– Medix2
Aug 15 at 2:37
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
An alternate interpretation is that it works but doesn't do anything useful, since "the passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it." You just turn an angry stone golem into an equally angry donut-shaped stone golem.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Aug 15 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson Arguably it would allow you to walk through the creature's space though... Ultimately the effects of a Stone Golem having a giant hole on them but that can still balance would be left to a GM. I'll probably add that to my answer later
$endgroup$
– Medix2
Aug 15 at 2:37
2
2
$begingroup$
An alternate interpretation is that it works but doesn't do anything useful, since "the passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it." You just turn an angry stone golem into an equally angry donut-shaped stone golem.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Aug 15 at 2:35
$begingroup$
An alternate interpretation is that it works but doesn't do anything useful, since "the passage creates no instability in a structure surrounding it." You just turn an angry stone golem into an equally angry donut-shaped stone golem.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Aug 15 at 2:35
1
1
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson Arguably it would allow you to walk through the creature's space though... Ultimately the effects of a Stone Golem having a giant hole on them but that can still balance would be left to a GM. I'll probably add that to my answer later
$endgroup$
– Medix2
Aug 15 at 2:37
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson Arguably it would allow you to walk through the creature's space though... Ultimately the effects of a Stone Golem having a giant hole on them but that can still balance would be left to a GM. I'll probably add that to my answer later
$endgroup$
– Medix2
Aug 15 at 2:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153547%2fdoes-stone-golem-skin-count-as-a-point-on-a-stone-surface-for-the-passwall-spe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown