Is it possible to tell if a child will turn into a Hag?Does a spellcaster know when their spell has no effect due to a save or immunity?Is it possible to cast multiple spells per turn?Are hag-children innately evil?Can a Fire Elemental deal damage to multiple creatures in the same turn by moving into their space?Can Polymorph turn a character into a dragon?Is it possible to use Druidcraft and Control Weather to tell if a given event will succeed?Is there a way to turn cantrips into reactions?Does Shield spell turn a hit into a miss?What type of stone do targets of Flesh to Stone, and Petrification, turn into?Is it possible to polymorph 2 characters into a Tarrasque using True Polymorph?If you cast True Polymorph on a party member to turn them into a monster, will they turn hostile or remain loyal?

What is the maximum number of PC-controlled undead?

How should an administrative assistant reply to student addressing them as "Professor" or "Doctor"?

On Math Looking Obvious in Retrospect

What are the conventions for transcribing Semitic languages into Greek?

Acceptable to cut steak before searing?

Double redundancy for the Saturn V LVDC computer memory, how were disagreements resolved?

What is my malfunctioning AI harvesting from humans?

How to mark beverage cans in a cooler for a blind person?

Is there a standardised way to check fake news?

What does "sardine box" mean?

Bitcoin successfully deducted on sender wallet but did not reach receiver wallet

Why do funding agencies like the NSF not publish accepted grants?

What is the difference between 型 and 形?

Can the ground attached to neutral fool a receptacle tester?

Three legged NOT gate? What is this symbol?

In SQL Server, why does backward scan of clustered index cannot use parallelism?

try/finally with bash shell

Why isn’t SHA-3 in wider use?

elisp regular expression build problem

What does Apple mean by "This may decrease battery life"?

Trying to write a shell script that keeps testing a server remotely, but it keeps falling in else statement when I logout

Different inverter (logic gate) symbols

Continuous vertical line using booktabs in tabularx table?

Blocking people from taking pictures of me with smartphone



Is it possible to tell if a child will turn into a Hag?


Does a spellcaster know when their spell has no effect due to a save or immunity?Is it possible to cast multiple spells per turn?Are hag-children innately evil?Can a Fire Elemental deal damage to multiple creatures in the same turn by moving into their space?Can Polymorph turn a character into a dragon?Is it possible to use Druidcraft and Control Weather to tell if a given event will succeed?Is there a way to turn cantrips into reactions?Does Shield spell turn a hit into a miss?What type of stone do targets of Flesh to Stone, and Petrification, turn into?Is it possible to polymorph 2 characters into a Tarrasque using True Polymorph?If you cast True Polymorph on a party member to turn them into a monster, will they turn hostile or remain loyal?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








30












$begingroup$


There's been a string of kidnappings and my players are about to discover a Hag coven. In the Hag's lair they will discover several children prisoners as well as some hag children. All will be the missing kids.



I'd like the group to be able to figure out which ones are which before returning the kids to their parents. What to do with the innocent looking hag children (and who won't become hags for another 4-7 years) should be an interesting dilemma for the characters. Of course if it is impossible to tell, that'll also be an interesting dilemma.



The MM p 176 says:




"Hags propagate by snatching and devouring human infants. After stealing
a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb, the hag consumes the poor child. A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.



"Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror."




This doesn't seem to give any guidance on telling if a child is a hag or not. Is there any way to discern the true nature of the child?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The hags should only be snatching and devouring human infants, unless this is a houserule change.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Jul 31 at 16:50






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Voight-Kampff test, of course.
    $endgroup$
    – cpcodes
    Jul 31 at 17:18






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the problem? The hag doesn't make clones of children, it produces new ones. They won't look like the kidnapped children. Are you thinking the parents won't be able to recognise their own children?
    $endgroup$
    – Cubic
    Aug 1 at 10:09






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    @Cubic "Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror." The new children look like the kidnapped ones apparently.
    $endgroup$
    – Botis
    Aug 1 at 12:38






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Botis Yes, they can do this if they steal a baby and produce a daughter that looks similar enough to that baby, but given that hags always produce daughters regardless of what child they eat clearly they can't be copies.
    $endgroup$
    – Cubic
    Aug 1 at 12:43

















30












$begingroup$


There's been a string of kidnappings and my players are about to discover a Hag coven. In the Hag's lair they will discover several children prisoners as well as some hag children. All will be the missing kids.



I'd like the group to be able to figure out which ones are which before returning the kids to their parents. What to do with the innocent looking hag children (and who won't become hags for another 4-7 years) should be an interesting dilemma for the characters. Of course if it is impossible to tell, that'll also be an interesting dilemma.



The MM p 176 says:




"Hags propagate by snatching and devouring human infants. After stealing
a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb, the hag consumes the poor child. A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.



"Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror."




This doesn't seem to give any guidance on telling if a child is a hag or not. Is there any way to discern the true nature of the child?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The hags should only be snatching and devouring human infants, unless this is a houserule change.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Jul 31 at 16:50






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Voight-Kampff test, of course.
    $endgroup$
    – cpcodes
    Jul 31 at 17:18






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the problem? The hag doesn't make clones of children, it produces new ones. They won't look like the kidnapped children. Are you thinking the parents won't be able to recognise their own children?
    $endgroup$
    – Cubic
    Aug 1 at 10:09






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    @Cubic "Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror." The new children look like the kidnapped ones apparently.
    $endgroup$
    – Botis
    Aug 1 at 12:38






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Botis Yes, they can do this if they steal a baby and produce a daughter that looks similar enough to that baby, but given that hags always produce daughters regardless of what child they eat clearly they can't be copies.
    $endgroup$
    – Cubic
    Aug 1 at 12:43













30












30








30


3



$begingroup$


There's been a string of kidnappings and my players are about to discover a Hag coven. In the Hag's lair they will discover several children prisoners as well as some hag children. All will be the missing kids.



I'd like the group to be able to figure out which ones are which before returning the kids to their parents. What to do with the innocent looking hag children (and who won't become hags for another 4-7 years) should be an interesting dilemma for the characters. Of course if it is impossible to tell, that'll also be an interesting dilemma.



The MM p 176 says:




"Hags propagate by snatching and devouring human infants. After stealing
a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb, the hag consumes the poor child. A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.



"Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror."




This doesn't seem to give any guidance on telling if a child is a hag or not. Is there any way to discern the true nature of the child?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




There's been a string of kidnappings and my players are about to discover a Hag coven. In the Hag's lair they will discover several children prisoners as well as some hag children. All will be the missing kids.



I'd like the group to be able to figure out which ones are which before returning the kids to their parents. What to do with the innocent looking hag children (and who won't become hags for another 4-7 years) should be an interesting dilemma for the characters. Of course if it is impossible to tell, that'll also be an interesting dilemma.



The MM p 176 says:




"Hags propagate by snatching and devouring human infants. After stealing
a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb, the hag consumes the poor child. A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.



"Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror."




This doesn't seem to give any guidance on telling if a child is a hag or not. Is there any way to discern the true nature of the child?







dnd-5e monsters






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 31 at 11:30









Sdjz

22.5k6 gold badges110 silver badges166 bronze badges




22.5k6 gold badges110 silver badges166 bronze badges










asked Jul 31 at 7:57









The Lost KittenThe Lost Kitten

1,4542 gold badges10 silver badges21 bronze badges




1,4542 gold badges10 silver badges21 bronze badges










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The hags should only be snatching and devouring human infants, unless this is a houserule change.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Jul 31 at 16:50






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Voight-Kampff test, of course.
    $endgroup$
    – cpcodes
    Jul 31 at 17:18






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the problem? The hag doesn't make clones of children, it produces new ones. They won't look like the kidnapped children. Are you thinking the parents won't be able to recognise their own children?
    $endgroup$
    – Cubic
    Aug 1 at 10:09






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    @Cubic "Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror." The new children look like the kidnapped ones apparently.
    $endgroup$
    – Botis
    Aug 1 at 12:38






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Botis Yes, they can do this if they steal a baby and produce a daughter that looks similar enough to that baby, but given that hags always produce daughters regardless of what child they eat clearly they can't be copies.
    $endgroup$
    – Cubic
    Aug 1 at 12:43












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The hags should only be snatching and devouring human infants, unless this is a houserule change.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Jul 31 at 16:50






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Voight-Kampff test, of course.
    $endgroup$
    – cpcodes
    Jul 31 at 17:18






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the problem? The hag doesn't make clones of children, it produces new ones. They won't look like the kidnapped children. Are you thinking the parents won't be able to recognise their own children?
    $endgroup$
    – Cubic
    Aug 1 at 10:09






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    @Cubic "Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror." The new children look like the kidnapped ones apparently.
    $endgroup$
    – Botis
    Aug 1 at 12:38






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Botis Yes, they can do this if they steal a baby and produce a daughter that looks similar enough to that baby, but given that hags always produce daughters regardless of what child they eat clearly they can't be copies.
    $endgroup$
    – Cubic
    Aug 1 at 12:43







4




4




$begingroup$
The hags should only be snatching and devouring human infants, unless this is a houserule change.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
Jul 31 at 16:50




$begingroup$
The hags should only be snatching and devouring human infants, unless this is a houserule change.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
Jul 31 at 16:50




10




10




$begingroup$
Voight-Kampff test, of course.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Jul 31 at 17:18




$begingroup$
Voight-Kampff test, of course.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Jul 31 at 17:18




3




3




$begingroup$
Can you clarify the problem? The hag doesn't make clones of children, it produces new ones. They won't look like the kidnapped children. Are you thinking the parents won't be able to recognise their own children?
$endgroup$
– Cubic
Aug 1 at 10:09




$begingroup$
Can you clarify the problem? The hag doesn't make clones of children, it produces new ones. They won't look like the kidnapped children. Are you thinking the parents won't be able to recognise their own children?
$endgroup$
– Cubic
Aug 1 at 10:09




6




6




$begingroup$
@Cubic "Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror." The new children look like the kidnapped ones apparently.
$endgroup$
– Botis
Aug 1 at 12:38




$begingroup$
@Cubic "Hags sometimes raise the daughters they spawn, creating covens. A hag might also return the child to its grieving parents, only to watch from the shadows as the child grows up to become a horror." The new children look like the kidnapped ones apparently.
$endgroup$
– Botis
Aug 1 at 12:38




2




2




$begingroup$
@Botis Yes, they can do this if they steal a baby and produce a daughter that looks similar enough to that baby, but given that hags always produce daughters regardless of what child they eat clearly they can't be copies.
$endgroup$
– Cubic
Aug 1 at 12:43




$begingroup$
@Botis Yes, they can do this if they steal a baby and produce a daughter that looks similar enough to that baby, but given that hags always produce daughters regardless of what child they eat clearly they can't be copies.
$endgroup$
– Cubic
Aug 1 at 12:43










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















45












$begingroup$

Any boy is not a hag



Note that hags are always female, the description you already quote says (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday




So any child that is a boy can be safely assumed to not be a hag.2



Most things that only affect humanoids or fey and fiends can work to distinguish girls



In 5e, each creature has a type:




A monster’s type speaks to its fundamental nature. Certain spells, magic items, class features, and other effects in the game interact in special ways with creatures of a particular type.




Human children are considered to be of the humanoid type (emphasis mine):




Humanoids are the main peoples of the D&D world, both civilized and savage, including humans and a tremendous variety of other species.




Despite their humanoid figure (head, torso, legs and arms), in 5e Hags are either fey or fiends, as can be seen this D&D Beyond search (Shago is not actually a hag, I promise) and the hag children should therefore be fiends or fey as they are said to merely appear to be human (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.




Using abilities that only affect humanoids or that only affect a fey or fiend can therefore be used to distinguish humanoid children from fey or fiend children. Since some of these abilities require saves or do not always work they aren't sure ways to tell. Here are some examples, note that this is not a comprehensive list, just some illustrative examples.



1.Abilities that you can use to be absolutely sure:




  • Detect Evil and Good can be used to detect feys or fiends:


    For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located.





  • Forbiddance damages (and might have the side effect of killing) certain kinds of creatures you choose:


    Choose one or more of the following: celestials, elementals, fey, fiends, and undead. When a chosen creature enters the spell's area for the first time on a turn or starts its turn there, the creature takes 5d10 radiant or necrotic damage (your choice when you cast this spell).




  • Trying to create a Simulacrum of each of the children is a (very expensive and lengthy) way to ensure they are humanoid since it only works on humanoids or beasts:


    You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell




2.Things that can help identify hags but you can never be absolutely certain due to the possibility of saving throws or other limitations:



  • Paladin's Divine Sense also allows you to detect fiends (but not fey):


    Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover





  • Arcane Abjuration from the Arcana Cleric's channel divinity only affects feys or fiends:


    As an action, you present your holy symbol, and one celestial, elemental, fey, or fiend of your choice that is within 30 feet of you must make a Wisdom saving throw, provided that the creature can see or hear you. If the creature fails its saving throw, it is turned for 1 minute or until it takes any damage.





  • Hold Person and Dominate Person are examples of spells that only affect humanoids and therefore can be used to rule out children that are affected.


  • Zone of Truth1, Detect Thoughts and other methods of compelling creatures to be helpful or learn their thoughts are also of some limited use, depending on what the children actually believe/know.

Like I said, this is not intended to be a complete list, any other ability or spell that affects humanoids but not fiends or fey or vice-versa can help in distinguishing hag children from humanoid children.




1. Suggested by sirjonsnow
2. As noted by DrTrunks Bell in 4e and 3.5e this was not as conclusive since male children of hags were possible through a different method and known as Hagspawn






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    That probably doesn't work because they were "[snatched as] a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb"
    $endgroup$
    – Ifusaso
    Jul 31 at 16:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @DrTrunksBell added as a note, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Aug 1 at 13:14


















9












$begingroup$

Detect Evil and Good



Hags are fey or fiends and the kidnapped children presumably aren’t - if they are: Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. Its the only way to be sure.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is worth noting that children will not "turn into a hag". Child is a hag that merely looks human.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Jul 31 at 10:14


















1












$begingroup$

Darkvision



You can process each child separately and make them do a test in the dark (or just check if they are scared in the dark). If they dodge a ball in the dark or can tell how many fingers you hold up, they're a hag. It's up to your players to make a good test as hags are intelligent creatures and might have trained their kids for this.



Damage Resistances, Immunity



Night hags have resistance to non-silvered weapons and are immune to being charmed. It's a trope that certain creatures (like vampires or werewolves) have an adverse reaction to silver.

You could extend this "aversion to silver" to your current hags if they aren't night hags.

A night hag also can't be charmed; if the players see that a charm spell doesn't have an effect on the child, they could presume it's a night hag.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Why wouldn't they 'fake the test' if they know? Also, Friends is cast on self, not on the hag. As for knowing if the charm is effective, see this question. And only night hags have the resistance, so the non-silvered test wouldn't apply to any others and OP didn't clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    "if they know", that's why you test them separately (and don't put them back in the same room) so they can't tell each other what the test is.
    $endgroup$
    – DrTrunks Bell
    Aug 1 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    You're making a lot of assumptions here and hags are reasonably intelligent. If the populace can think of that test, so can the hags and they'd have taught their children how to 'hide'. I'll stop arguing, but I think you need to some more support and should address the other problems I addressed.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 14:44













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152726%2fis-it-possible-to-tell-if-a-child-will-turn-into-a-hag%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









45












$begingroup$

Any boy is not a hag



Note that hags are always female, the description you already quote says (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday




So any child that is a boy can be safely assumed to not be a hag.2



Most things that only affect humanoids or fey and fiends can work to distinguish girls



In 5e, each creature has a type:




A monster’s type speaks to its fundamental nature. Certain spells, magic items, class features, and other effects in the game interact in special ways with creatures of a particular type.




Human children are considered to be of the humanoid type (emphasis mine):




Humanoids are the main peoples of the D&D world, both civilized and savage, including humans and a tremendous variety of other species.




Despite their humanoid figure (head, torso, legs and arms), in 5e Hags are either fey or fiends, as can be seen this D&D Beyond search (Shago is not actually a hag, I promise) and the hag children should therefore be fiends or fey as they are said to merely appear to be human (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.




Using abilities that only affect humanoids or that only affect a fey or fiend can therefore be used to distinguish humanoid children from fey or fiend children. Since some of these abilities require saves or do not always work they aren't sure ways to tell. Here are some examples, note that this is not a comprehensive list, just some illustrative examples.



1.Abilities that you can use to be absolutely sure:




  • Detect Evil and Good can be used to detect feys or fiends:


    For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located.





  • Forbiddance damages (and might have the side effect of killing) certain kinds of creatures you choose:


    Choose one or more of the following: celestials, elementals, fey, fiends, and undead. When a chosen creature enters the spell's area for the first time on a turn or starts its turn there, the creature takes 5d10 radiant or necrotic damage (your choice when you cast this spell).




  • Trying to create a Simulacrum of each of the children is a (very expensive and lengthy) way to ensure they are humanoid since it only works on humanoids or beasts:


    You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell




2.Things that can help identify hags but you can never be absolutely certain due to the possibility of saving throws or other limitations:



  • Paladin's Divine Sense also allows you to detect fiends (but not fey):


    Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover





  • Arcane Abjuration from the Arcana Cleric's channel divinity only affects feys or fiends:


    As an action, you present your holy symbol, and one celestial, elemental, fey, or fiend of your choice that is within 30 feet of you must make a Wisdom saving throw, provided that the creature can see or hear you. If the creature fails its saving throw, it is turned for 1 minute or until it takes any damage.





  • Hold Person and Dominate Person are examples of spells that only affect humanoids and therefore can be used to rule out children that are affected.


  • Zone of Truth1, Detect Thoughts and other methods of compelling creatures to be helpful or learn their thoughts are also of some limited use, depending on what the children actually believe/know.

Like I said, this is not intended to be a complete list, any other ability or spell that affects humanoids but not fiends or fey or vice-versa can help in distinguishing hag children from humanoid children.




1. Suggested by sirjonsnow
2. As noted by DrTrunks Bell in 4e and 3.5e this was not as conclusive since male children of hags were possible through a different method and known as Hagspawn






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    That probably doesn't work because they were "[snatched as] a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb"
    $endgroup$
    – Ifusaso
    Jul 31 at 16:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @DrTrunksBell added as a note, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Aug 1 at 13:14















45












$begingroup$

Any boy is not a hag



Note that hags are always female, the description you already quote says (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday




So any child that is a boy can be safely assumed to not be a hag.2



Most things that only affect humanoids or fey and fiends can work to distinguish girls



In 5e, each creature has a type:




A monster’s type speaks to its fundamental nature. Certain spells, magic items, class features, and other effects in the game interact in special ways with creatures of a particular type.




Human children are considered to be of the humanoid type (emphasis mine):




Humanoids are the main peoples of the D&D world, both civilized and savage, including humans and a tremendous variety of other species.




Despite their humanoid figure (head, torso, legs and arms), in 5e Hags are either fey or fiends, as can be seen this D&D Beyond search (Shago is not actually a hag, I promise) and the hag children should therefore be fiends or fey as they are said to merely appear to be human (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.




Using abilities that only affect humanoids or that only affect a fey or fiend can therefore be used to distinguish humanoid children from fey or fiend children. Since some of these abilities require saves or do not always work they aren't sure ways to tell. Here are some examples, note that this is not a comprehensive list, just some illustrative examples.



1.Abilities that you can use to be absolutely sure:




  • Detect Evil and Good can be used to detect feys or fiends:


    For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located.





  • Forbiddance damages (and might have the side effect of killing) certain kinds of creatures you choose:


    Choose one or more of the following: celestials, elementals, fey, fiends, and undead. When a chosen creature enters the spell's area for the first time on a turn or starts its turn there, the creature takes 5d10 radiant or necrotic damage (your choice when you cast this spell).




  • Trying to create a Simulacrum of each of the children is a (very expensive and lengthy) way to ensure they are humanoid since it only works on humanoids or beasts:


    You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell




2.Things that can help identify hags but you can never be absolutely certain due to the possibility of saving throws or other limitations:



  • Paladin's Divine Sense also allows you to detect fiends (but not fey):


    Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover





  • Arcane Abjuration from the Arcana Cleric's channel divinity only affects feys or fiends:


    As an action, you present your holy symbol, and one celestial, elemental, fey, or fiend of your choice that is within 30 feet of you must make a Wisdom saving throw, provided that the creature can see or hear you. If the creature fails its saving throw, it is turned for 1 minute or until it takes any damage.





  • Hold Person and Dominate Person are examples of spells that only affect humanoids and therefore can be used to rule out children that are affected.


  • Zone of Truth1, Detect Thoughts and other methods of compelling creatures to be helpful or learn their thoughts are also of some limited use, depending on what the children actually believe/know.

Like I said, this is not intended to be a complete list, any other ability or spell that affects humanoids but not fiends or fey or vice-versa can help in distinguishing hag children from humanoid children.




1. Suggested by sirjonsnow
2. As noted by DrTrunks Bell in 4e and 3.5e this was not as conclusive since male children of hags were possible through a different method and known as Hagspawn






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    That probably doesn't work because they were "[snatched as] a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb"
    $endgroup$
    – Ifusaso
    Jul 31 at 16:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @DrTrunksBell added as a note, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Aug 1 at 13:14













45












45








45





$begingroup$

Any boy is not a hag



Note that hags are always female, the description you already quote says (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday




So any child that is a boy can be safely assumed to not be a hag.2



Most things that only affect humanoids or fey and fiends can work to distinguish girls



In 5e, each creature has a type:




A monster’s type speaks to its fundamental nature. Certain spells, magic items, class features, and other effects in the game interact in special ways with creatures of a particular type.




Human children are considered to be of the humanoid type (emphasis mine):




Humanoids are the main peoples of the D&D world, both civilized and savage, including humans and a tremendous variety of other species.




Despite their humanoid figure (head, torso, legs and arms), in 5e Hags are either fey or fiends, as can be seen this D&D Beyond search (Shago is not actually a hag, I promise) and the hag children should therefore be fiends or fey as they are said to merely appear to be human (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.




Using abilities that only affect humanoids or that only affect a fey or fiend can therefore be used to distinguish humanoid children from fey or fiend children. Since some of these abilities require saves or do not always work they aren't sure ways to tell. Here are some examples, note that this is not a comprehensive list, just some illustrative examples.



1.Abilities that you can use to be absolutely sure:




  • Detect Evil and Good can be used to detect feys or fiends:


    For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located.





  • Forbiddance damages (and might have the side effect of killing) certain kinds of creatures you choose:


    Choose one or more of the following: celestials, elementals, fey, fiends, and undead. When a chosen creature enters the spell's area for the first time on a turn or starts its turn there, the creature takes 5d10 radiant or necrotic damage (your choice when you cast this spell).




  • Trying to create a Simulacrum of each of the children is a (very expensive and lengthy) way to ensure they are humanoid since it only works on humanoids or beasts:


    You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell




2.Things that can help identify hags but you can never be absolutely certain due to the possibility of saving throws or other limitations:



  • Paladin's Divine Sense also allows you to detect fiends (but not fey):


    Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover





  • Arcane Abjuration from the Arcana Cleric's channel divinity only affects feys or fiends:


    As an action, you present your holy symbol, and one celestial, elemental, fey, or fiend of your choice that is within 30 feet of you must make a Wisdom saving throw, provided that the creature can see or hear you. If the creature fails its saving throw, it is turned for 1 minute or until it takes any damage.





  • Hold Person and Dominate Person are examples of spells that only affect humanoids and therefore can be used to rule out children that are affected.


  • Zone of Truth1, Detect Thoughts and other methods of compelling creatures to be helpful or learn their thoughts are also of some limited use, depending on what the children actually believe/know.

Like I said, this is not intended to be a complete list, any other ability or spell that affects humanoids but not fiends or fey or vice-versa can help in distinguishing hag children from humanoid children.




1. Suggested by sirjonsnow
2. As noted by DrTrunks Bell in 4e and 3.5e this was not as conclusive since male children of hags were possible through a different method and known as Hagspawn






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Any boy is not a hag



Note that hags are always female, the description you already quote says (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday




So any child that is a boy can be safely assumed to not be a hag.2



Most things that only affect humanoids or fey and fiends can work to distinguish girls



In 5e, each creature has a type:




A monster’s type speaks to its fundamental nature. Certain spells, magic items, class features, and other effects in the game interact in special ways with creatures of a particular type.




Human children are considered to be of the humanoid type (emphasis mine):




Humanoids are the main peoples of the D&D world, both civilized and savage, including humans and a tremendous variety of other species.




Despite their humanoid figure (head, torso, legs and arms), in 5e Hags are either fey or fiends, as can be seen this D&D Beyond search (Shago is not actually a hag, I promise) and the hag children should therefore be fiends or fey as they are said to merely appear to be human (emphasis mine):




A week later, the hag gives birth to a daughter who looks human until her thirteenth birthday, whereupon the child transforms into the spitting image of her hag mother.




Using abilities that only affect humanoids or that only affect a fey or fiend can therefore be used to distinguish humanoid children from fey or fiend children. Since some of these abilities require saves or do not always work they aren't sure ways to tell. Here are some examples, note that this is not a comprehensive list, just some illustrative examples.



1.Abilities that you can use to be absolutely sure:




  • Detect Evil and Good can be used to detect feys or fiends:


    For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located.





  • Forbiddance damages (and might have the side effect of killing) certain kinds of creatures you choose:


    Choose one or more of the following: celestials, elementals, fey, fiends, and undead. When a chosen creature enters the spell's area for the first time on a turn or starts its turn there, the creature takes 5d10 radiant or necrotic damage (your choice when you cast this spell).




  • Trying to create a Simulacrum of each of the children is a (very expensive and lengthy) way to ensure they are humanoid since it only works on humanoids or beasts:


    You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell




2.Things that can help identify hags but you can never be absolutely certain due to the possibility of saving throws or other limitations:



  • Paladin's Divine Sense also allows you to detect fiends (but not fey):


    Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover





  • Arcane Abjuration from the Arcana Cleric's channel divinity only affects feys or fiends:


    As an action, you present your holy symbol, and one celestial, elemental, fey, or fiend of your choice that is within 30 feet of you must make a Wisdom saving throw, provided that the creature can see or hear you. If the creature fails its saving throw, it is turned for 1 minute or until it takes any damage.





  • Hold Person and Dominate Person are examples of spells that only affect humanoids and therefore can be used to rule out children that are affected.


  • Zone of Truth1, Detect Thoughts and other methods of compelling creatures to be helpful or learn their thoughts are also of some limited use, depending on what the children actually believe/know.

Like I said, this is not intended to be a complete list, any other ability or spell that affects humanoids but not fiends or fey or vice-versa can help in distinguishing hag children from humanoid children.




1. Suggested by sirjonsnow
2. As noted by DrTrunks Bell in 4e and 3.5e this was not as conclusive since male children of hags were possible through a different method and known as Hagspawn







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 1 at 13:14

























answered Jul 31 at 10:21









SdjzSdjz

22.5k6 gold badges110 silver badges166 bronze badges




22.5k6 gold badges110 silver badges166 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    That probably doesn't work because they were "[snatched as] a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb"
    $endgroup$
    – Ifusaso
    Jul 31 at 16:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @DrTrunksBell added as a note, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Aug 1 at 13:14
















  • $begingroup$
    That probably doesn't work because they were "[snatched as] a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb"
    $endgroup$
    – Ifusaso
    Jul 31 at 16:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @DrTrunksBell added as a note, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Aug 1 at 13:14















$begingroup$
That probably doesn't work because they were "[snatched as] a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb"
$endgroup$
– Ifusaso
Jul 31 at 16:41




$begingroup$
That probably doesn't work because they were "[snatched as] a baby from its cradle or its mother's womb"
$endgroup$
– Ifusaso
Jul 31 at 16:41




2




2




$begingroup$
@DrTrunksBell added as a note, thank you
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
Aug 1 at 13:14




$begingroup$
@DrTrunksBell added as a note, thank you
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
Aug 1 at 13:14













9












$begingroup$

Detect Evil and Good



Hags are fey or fiends and the kidnapped children presumably aren’t - if they are: Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. Its the only way to be sure.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is worth noting that children will not "turn into a hag". Child is a hag that merely looks human.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Jul 31 at 10:14















9












$begingroup$

Detect Evil and Good



Hags are fey or fiends and the kidnapped children presumably aren’t - if they are: Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. Its the only way to be sure.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is worth noting that children will not "turn into a hag". Child is a hag that merely looks human.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Jul 31 at 10:14













9












9








9





$begingroup$

Detect Evil and Good



Hags are fey or fiends and the kidnapped children presumably aren’t - if they are: Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. Its the only way to be sure.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Detect Evil and Good



Hags are fey or fiends and the kidnapped children presumably aren’t - if they are: Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. Its the only way to be sure.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jul 31 at 8:44









Dale MDale M

120k26 gold badges312 silver badges531 bronze badges




120k26 gold badges312 silver badges531 bronze badges










  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is worth noting that children will not "turn into a hag". Child is a hag that merely looks human.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Jul 31 at 10:14












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is worth noting that children will not "turn into a hag". Child is a hag that merely looks human.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Jul 31 at 10:14







6




6




$begingroup$
It is worth noting that children will not "turn into a hag". Child is a hag that merely looks human.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jul 31 at 10:14




$begingroup$
It is worth noting that children will not "turn into a hag". Child is a hag that merely looks human.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jul 31 at 10:14











1












$begingroup$

Darkvision



You can process each child separately and make them do a test in the dark (or just check if they are scared in the dark). If they dodge a ball in the dark or can tell how many fingers you hold up, they're a hag. It's up to your players to make a good test as hags are intelligent creatures and might have trained their kids for this.



Damage Resistances, Immunity



Night hags have resistance to non-silvered weapons and are immune to being charmed. It's a trope that certain creatures (like vampires or werewolves) have an adverse reaction to silver.

You could extend this "aversion to silver" to your current hags if they aren't night hags.

A night hag also can't be charmed; if the players see that a charm spell doesn't have an effect on the child, they could presume it's a night hag.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Why wouldn't they 'fake the test' if they know? Also, Friends is cast on self, not on the hag. As for knowing if the charm is effective, see this question. And only night hags have the resistance, so the non-silvered test wouldn't apply to any others and OP didn't clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    "if they know", that's why you test them separately (and don't put them back in the same room) so they can't tell each other what the test is.
    $endgroup$
    – DrTrunks Bell
    Aug 1 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    You're making a lot of assumptions here and hags are reasonably intelligent. If the populace can think of that test, so can the hags and they'd have taught their children how to 'hide'. I'll stop arguing, but I think you need to some more support and should address the other problems I addressed.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 14:44















1












$begingroup$

Darkvision



You can process each child separately and make them do a test in the dark (or just check if they are scared in the dark). If they dodge a ball in the dark or can tell how many fingers you hold up, they're a hag. It's up to your players to make a good test as hags are intelligent creatures and might have trained their kids for this.



Damage Resistances, Immunity



Night hags have resistance to non-silvered weapons and are immune to being charmed. It's a trope that certain creatures (like vampires or werewolves) have an adverse reaction to silver.

You could extend this "aversion to silver" to your current hags if they aren't night hags.

A night hag also can't be charmed; if the players see that a charm spell doesn't have an effect on the child, they could presume it's a night hag.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Why wouldn't they 'fake the test' if they know? Also, Friends is cast on self, not on the hag. As for knowing if the charm is effective, see this question. And only night hags have the resistance, so the non-silvered test wouldn't apply to any others and OP didn't clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    "if they know", that's why you test them separately (and don't put them back in the same room) so they can't tell each other what the test is.
    $endgroup$
    – DrTrunks Bell
    Aug 1 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    You're making a lot of assumptions here and hags are reasonably intelligent. If the populace can think of that test, so can the hags and they'd have taught their children how to 'hide'. I'll stop arguing, but I think you need to some more support and should address the other problems I addressed.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 14:44













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Darkvision



You can process each child separately and make them do a test in the dark (or just check if they are scared in the dark). If they dodge a ball in the dark or can tell how many fingers you hold up, they're a hag. It's up to your players to make a good test as hags are intelligent creatures and might have trained their kids for this.



Damage Resistances, Immunity



Night hags have resistance to non-silvered weapons and are immune to being charmed. It's a trope that certain creatures (like vampires or werewolves) have an adverse reaction to silver.

You could extend this "aversion to silver" to your current hags if they aren't night hags.

A night hag also can't be charmed; if the players see that a charm spell doesn't have an effect on the child, they could presume it's a night hag.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Darkvision



You can process each child separately and make them do a test in the dark (or just check if they are scared in the dark). If they dodge a ball in the dark or can tell how many fingers you hold up, they're a hag. It's up to your players to make a good test as hags are intelligent creatures and might have trained their kids for this.



Damage Resistances, Immunity



Night hags have resistance to non-silvered weapons and are immune to being charmed. It's a trope that certain creatures (like vampires or werewolves) have an adverse reaction to silver.

You could extend this "aversion to silver" to your current hags if they aren't night hags.

A night hag also can't be charmed; if the players see that a charm spell doesn't have an effect on the child, they could presume it's a night hag.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 2 at 4:20









V2Blast

33.3k5 gold badges121 silver badges208 bronze badges




33.3k5 gold badges121 silver badges208 bronze badges










answered Aug 1 at 13:26









DrTrunks BellDrTrunks Bell

874 bronze badges




874 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Why wouldn't they 'fake the test' if they know? Also, Friends is cast on self, not on the hag. As for knowing if the charm is effective, see this question. And only night hags have the resistance, so the non-silvered test wouldn't apply to any others and OP didn't clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    "if they know", that's why you test them separately (and don't put them back in the same room) so they can't tell each other what the test is.
    $endgroup$
    – DrTrunks Bell
    Aug 1 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    You're making a lot of assumptions here and hags are reasonably intelligent. If the populace can think of that test, so can the hags and they'd have taught their children how to 'hide'. I'll stop arguing, but I think you need to some more support and should address the other problems I addressed.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 14:44
















  • $begingroup$
    Why wouldn't they 'fake the test' if they know? Also, Friends is cast on self, not on the hag. As for knowing if the charm is effective, see this question. And only night hags have the resistance, so the non-silvered test wouldn't apply to any others and OP didn't clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    "if they know", that's why you test them separately (and don't put them back in the same room) so they can't tell each other what the test is.
    $endgroup$
    – DrTrunks Bell
    Aug 1 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    You're making a lot of assumptions here and hags are reasonably intelligent. If the populace can think of that test, so can the hags and they'd have taught their children how to 'hide'. I'll stop arguing, but I think you need to some more support and should address the other problems I addressed.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Aug 1 at 14:44















$begingroup$
Why wouldn't they 'fake the test' if they know? Also, Friends is cast on self, not on the hag. As for knowing if the charm is effective, see this question. And only night hags have the resistance, so the non-silvered test wouldn't apply to any others and OP didn't clarify.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Aug 1 at 13:41




$begingroup$
Why wouldn't they 'fake the test' if they know? Also, Friends is cast on self, not on the hag. As for knowing if the charm is effective, see this question. And only night hags have the resistance, so the non-silvered test wouldn't apply to any others and OP didn't clarify.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Aug 1 at 13:41












$begingroup$
"if they know", that's why you test them separately (and don't put them back in the same room) so they can't tell each other what the test is.
$endgroup$
– DrTrunks Bell
Aug 1 at 14:31




$begingroup$
"if they know", that's why you test them separately (and don't put them back in the same room) so they can't tell each other what the test is.
$endgroup$
– DrTrunks Bell
Aug 1 at 14:31












$begingroup$
You're making a lot of assumptions here and hags are reasonably intelligent. If the populace can think of that test, so can the hags and they'd have taught their children how to 'hide'. I'll stop arguing, but I think you need to some more support and should address the other problems I addressed.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Aug 1 at 14:44




$begingroup$
You're making a lot of assumptions here and hags are reasonably intelligent. If the populace can think of that test, so can the hags and they'd have taught their children how to 'hide'. I'll stop arguing, but I think you need to some more support and should address the other problems I addressed.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Aug 1 at 14:44

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152726%2fis-it-possible-to-tell-if-a-child-will-turn-into-a-hag%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?