Why is the Lucas test not recommended to differentiate higher alcohols?Doubts Regarding Ceric Ammonium Nitrate Test for AlcoholsWhy are tertiary alkyl halides obtained in higher yield than secondary or primary during free radical halogenation of alkanes?Identification of types of alcoholsLucas test for alcoholsWhy doesn't a halide anion react with primary or secondary alcohols using SN2?Nucleophilicity of alcoxy groupsUnknown alcohol sample. Chromic acid negative but iodoform positive?Is it correct to say that ethenol is an alcohol?Doubts Regarding Ceric Ammonium Nitrate Test for Alcohols

Can I take an upcast spell as my Mystic Arcanum?

How is linear momentum conserved in case of a freely falling body?

Why is "-ber" the suffix of the last four months of the year?

Papers on arXiv solving the same problem at the same time

When calculating a force, why do I get different result when I try to calculate via torque vs via sum of forces at an axis?

Does Yeshayahu 43:10b / 43:13a imply HaShem was created?

Heyacrazy: Empty Space

Server Integrity Check CheckCommands question

Tex Quotes(UVa 272)

Can $! cause race conditions when used in scripts running in parallel?

Nothing like a good ol' game of ModTen

How does the OS tell whether an "Address is already in use"?

Does ostensible/specious make sense in this sentence?

How many lines of code does the original TeX contain?

Why is proof-of-work required in Bitcoin?

Handling Disruptive Student on the Autism Spectrum

Should I stick with American terminology in my English set young adult book?

Tipa throwing error because of `implies` and `iff`. Workaround or fix?

Which drashot require a mesorah?

Billiard balls collision

Why is the UK so keen to remove the "backstop" when their leadership seems to think that no border will be needed in Northern Ireland?

How to maximize the drop odds of the Essences in Diablo II?

How do proponents of Sola Scriptura address the ministry of those Apostles who authored no parts of Scripture?

Redacting URLs as an email-phishing preventative?



Why is the Lucas test not recommended to differentiate higher alcohols?


Doubts Regarding Ceric Ammonium Nitrate Test for AlcoholsWhy are tertiary alkyl halides obtained in higher yield than secondary or primary during free radical halogenation of alkanes?Identification of types of alcoholsLucas test for alcoholsWhy doesn't a halide anion react with primary or secondary alcohols using SN2?Nucleophilicity of alcoxy groupsUnknown alcohol sample. Chromic acid negative but iodoform positive?Is it correct to say that ethenol is an alcohol?Doubts Regarding Ceric Ammonium Nitrate Test for Alcohols






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


I read about the Lucas test for alcohols in which a cloudy precipitate is produced with a tertiary or secondary alcohol. However, on a side note it was mentioned that this test is useful only for compounds having less than six carbon atoms. Why is this so?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This "degre" nomenclature for alcohols is terribly outdated. Profs teaching that today are really old and have learned it from teachers which were already oldfashioned then.
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    Aug 14 at 5:51

















6












$begingroup$


I read about the Lucas test for alcohols in which a cloudy precipitate is produced with a tertiary or secondary alcohol. However, on a side note it was mentioned that this test is useful only for compounds having less than six carbon atoms. Why is this so?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This "degre" nomenclature for alcohols is terribly outdated. Profs teaching that today are really old and have learned it from teachers which were already oldfashioned then.
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    Aug 14 at 5:51













6












6








6





$begingroup$


I read about the Lucas test for alcohols in which a cloudy precipitate is produced with a tertiary or secondary alcohol. However, on a side note it was mentioned that this test is useful only for compounds having less than six carbon atoms. Why is this so?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I read about the Lucas test for alcohols in which a cloudy precipitate is produced with a tertiary or secondary alcohol. However, on a side note it was mentioned that this test is useful only for compounds having less than six carbon atoms. Why is this so?







organic-chemistry alcohols






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 13 at 20:12









William R. Ebenezer

1,7601 gold badge5 silver badges23 bronze badges




1,7601 gold badge5 silver badges23 bronze badges










asked Aug 13 at 15:10









StackUpPhysicsStackUpPhysics

1899 bronze badges




1899 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    This "degre" nomenclature for alcohols is terribly outdated. Profs teaching that today are really old and have learned it from teachers which were already oldfashioned then.
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    Aug 14 at 5:51
















  • $begingroup$
    This "degre" nomenclature for alcohols is terribly outdated. Profs teaching that today are really old and have learned it from teachers which were already oldfashioned then.
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    Aug 14 at 5:51















$begingroup$
This "degre" nomenclature for alcohols is terribly outdated. Profs teaching that today are really old and have learned it from teachers which were already oldfashioned then.
$endgroup$
– Karl
Aug 14 at 5:51




$begingroup$
This "degre" nomenclature for alcohols is terribly outdated. Profs teaching that today are really old and have learned it from teachers which were already oldfashioned then.
$endgroup$
– Karl
Aug 14 at 5:51










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5













$begingroup$

The problem is that the alcohols themselves might be insoluble. Ethanol is soluble, yes, but as the alkyl chain length increases, the hydrophobic nature due to the chain starts dominating over whatever hydrophilicity the $ce-OH$ group had been providing for lower homologues.



From source [1]:




.. any alcohol that is insoluble in the reagent might appear to be giving a positive 3° test.




The paper goes on to properly quantify several things:




Based on the results of this study, using 1 drop of alcohol added to 10 drops of reagent, it can be said that, at the very least, all saturated acyclic monofunctional alcohols having six or fewer carbons are soluble in the Lucas reagent.




It is clear that the relative amounts of the sample and the reagent become important in such borderline cases (~6 carbon long chains). If too much alcohol is added, it may cause an illusion of positive lucas test.



From source [1]: (emphasis mine)




That statement may not be true when 3 or 4 drops are used
per 10 drops of reagent. In fact, sometimes when 10 drops of
reagent are added to 3 or 4 drops of some of the alcohols, an
interesting event occurs after a delay of a couple of minutes
or so. Apparently, some undissolved alcohol that has been
clinging to the bottom of the test tube suddenly breaks loose
and, by streaming to the surface of the very dense Lucas
reagent, gives a momentary illusion of a positive test. The
real cloudiness, alkyl chloride formation, appears later—all
the more reason to use a high reagent/alcohol ratio.




References:



[1] "A study of the Lucas test"
R. A. Kjonaas and B. A. Riedford
J. Chem. Ed. 1991 68 (8), 704
DOI: 10.1021/ed068p704






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    3













    $begingroup$

    To get a cloudy "precipitate", you need to dissolve the alcohol in the acid solution. Alcohols get less soluble in water as their chain length increases. By the time you pass 6 carbons, the alcohol itself is more or less insoluble. If it reacts along the interface, the chloride product would just mix into the alcohol layer, with no visible change.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please share the reference you've used
      $endgroup$
      – StackUpPhysics
      Aug 13 at 16:33










    • $begingroup$
      I had no specific reference in mind, just general knowledge. The other answer is more complete than anything I had in mind.
      $endgroup$
      – jeffB
      Aug 13 at 19:34






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      no problem still I appreciate your efforts
      $endgroup$
      – StackUpPhysics
      Aug 14 at 1:14













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "431"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119157%2fwhy-is-the-lucas-test-not-recommended-to-differentiate-higher-alcohols%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5













    $begingroup$

    The problem is that the alcohols themselves might be insoluble. Ethanol is soluble, yes, but as the alkyl chain length increases, the hydrophobic nature due to the chain starts dominating over whatever hydrophilicity the $ce-OH$ group had been providing for lower homologues.



    From source [1]:




    .. any alcohol that is insoluble in the reagent might appear to be giving a positive 3° test.




    The paper goes on to properly quantify several things:




    Based on the results of this study, using 1 drop of alcohol added to 10 drops of reagent, it can be said that, at the very least, all saturated acyclic monofunctional alcohols having six or fewer carbons are soluble in the Lucas reagent.




    It is clear that the relative amounts of the sample and the reagent become important in such borderline cases (~6 carbon long chains). If too much alcohol is added, it may cause an illusion of positive lucas test.



    From source [1]: (emphasis mine)




    That statement may not be true when 3 or 4 drops are used
    per 10 drops of reagent. In fact, sometimes when 10 drops of
    reagent are added to 3 or 4 drops of some of the alcohols, an
    interesting event occurs after a delay of a couple of minutes
    or so. Apparently, some undissolved alcohol that has been
    clinging to the bottom of the test tube suddenly breaks loose
    and, by streaming to the surface of the very dense Lucas
    reagent, gives a momentary illusion of a positive test. The
    real cloudiness, alkyl chloride formation, appears later—all
    the more reason to use a high reagent/alcohol ratio.




    References:



    [1] "A study of the Lucas test"
    R. A. Kjonaas and B. A. Riedford
    J. Chem. Ed. 1991 68 (8), 704
    DOI: 10.1021/ed068p704






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      5













      $begingroup$

      The problem is that the alcohols themselves might be insoluble. Ethanol is soluble, yes, but as the alkyl chain length increases, the hydrophobic nature due to the chain starts dominating over whatever hydrophilicity the $ce-OH$ group had been providing for lower homologues.



      From source [1]:




      .. any alcohol that is insoluble in the reagent might appear to be giving a positive 3° test.




      The paper goes on to properly quantify several things:




      Based on the results of this study, using 1 drop of alcohol added to 10 drops of reagent, it can be said that, at the very least, all saturated acyclic monofunctional alcohols having six or fewer carbons are soluble in the Lucas reagent.




      It is clear that the relative amounts of the sample and the reagent become important in such borderline cases (~6 carbon long chains). If too much alcohol is added, it may cause an illusion of positive lucas test.



      From source [1]: (emphasis mine)




      That statement may not be true when 3 or 4 drops are used
      per 10 drops of reagent. In fact, sometimes when 10 drops of
      reagent are added to 3 or 4 drops of some of the alcohols, an
      interesting event occurs after a delay of a couple of minutes
      or so. Apparently, some undissolved alcohol that has been
      clinging to the bottom of the test tube suddenly breaks loose
      and, by streaming to the surface of the very dense Lucas
      reagent, gives a momentary illusion of a positive test. The
      real cloudiness, alkyl chloride formation, appears later—all
      the more reason to use a high reagent/alcohol ratio.




      References:



      [1] "A study of the Lucas test"
      R. A. Kjonaas and B. A. Riedford
      J. Chem. Ed. 1991 68 (8), 704
      DOI: 10.1021/ed068p704






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        5














        5










        5







        $begingroup$

        The problem is that the alcohols themselves might be insoluble. Ethanol is soluble, yes, but as the alkyl chain length increases, the hydrophobic nature due to the chain starts dominating over whatever hydrophilicity the $ce-OH$ group had been providing for lower homologues.



        From source [1]:




        .. any alcohol that is insoluble in the reagent might appear to be giving a positive 3° test.




        The paper goes on to properly quantify several things:




        Based on the results of this study, using 1 drop of alcohol added to 10 drops of reagent, it can be said that, at the very least, all saturated acyclic monofunctional alcohols having six or fewer carbons are soluble in the Lucas reagent.




        It is clear that the relative amounts of the sample and the reagent become important in such borderline cases (~6 carbon long chains). If too much alcohol is added, it may cause an illusion of positive lucas test.



        From source [1]: (emphasis mine)




        That statement may not be true when 3 or 4 drops are used
        per 10 drops of reagent. In fact, sometimes when 10 drops of
        reagent are added to 3 or 4 drops of some of the alcohols, an
        interesting event occurs after a delay of a couple of minutes
        or so. Apparently, some undissolved alcohol that has been
        clinging to the bottom of the test tube suddenly breaks loose
        and, by streaming to the surface of the very dense Lucas
        reagent, gives a momentary illusion of a positive test. The
        real cloudiness, alkyl chloride formation, appears later—all
        the more reason to use a high reagent/alcohol ratio.




        References:



        [1] "A study of the Lucas test"
        R. A. Kjonaas and B. A. Riedford
        J. Chem. Ed. 1991 68 (8), 704
        DOI: 10.1021/ed068p704






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The problem is that the alcohols themselves might be insoluble. Ethanol is soluble, yes, but as the alkyl chain length increases, the hydrophobic nature due to the chain starts dominating over whatever hydrophilicity the $ce-OH$ group had been providing for lower homologues.



        From source [1]:




        .. any alcohol that is insoluble in the reagent might appear to be giving a positive 3° test.




        The paper goes on to properly quantify several things:




        Based on the results of this study, using 1 drop of alcohol added to 10 drops of reagent, it can be said that, at the very least, all saturated acyclic monofunctional alcohols having six or fewer carbons are soluble in the Lucas reagent.




        It is clear that the relative amounts of the sample and the reagent become important in such borderline cases (~6 carbon long chains). If too much alcohol is added, it may cause an illusion of positive lucas test.



        From source [1]: (emphasis mine)




        That statement may not be true when 3 or 4 drops are used
        per 10 drops of reagent. In fact, sometimes when 10 drops of
        reagent are added to 3 or 4 drops of some of the alcohols, an
        interesting event occurs after a delay of a couple of minutes
        or so. Apparently, some undissolved alcohol that has been
        clinging to the bottom of the test tube suddenly breaks loose
        and, by streaming to the surface of the very dense Lucas
        reagent, gives a momentary illusion of a positive test. The
        real cloudiness, alkyl chloride formation, appears later—all
        the more reason to use a high reagent/alcohol ratio.




        References:



        [1] "A study of the Lucas test"
        R. A. Kjonaas and B. A. Riedford
        J. Chem. Ed. 1991 68 (8), 704
        DOI: 10.1021/ed068p704







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 13 at 16:51









        William R. EbenezerWilliam R. Ebenezer

        1,7601 gold badge5 silver badges23 bronze badges




        1,7601 gold badge5 silver badges23 bronze badges


























            3













            $begingroup$

            To get a cloudy "precipitate", you need to dissolve the alcohol in the acid solution. Alcohols get less soluble in water as their chain length increases. By the time you pass 6 carbons, the alcohol itself is more or less insoluble. If it reacts along the interface, the chloride product would just mix into the alcohol layer, with no visible change.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Please share the reference you've used
              $endgroup$
              – StackUpPhysics
              Aug 13 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              I had no specific reference in mind, just general knowledge. The other answer is more complete than anything I had in mind.
              $endgroup$
              – jeffB
              Aug 13 at 19:34






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              no problem still I appreciate your efforts
              $endgroup$
              – StackUpPhysics
              Aug 14 at 1:14















            3













            $begingroup$

            To get a cloudy "precipitate", you need to dissolve the alcohol in the acid solution. Alcohols get less soluble in water as their chain length increases. By the time you pass 6 carbons, the alcohol itself is more or less insoluble. If it reacts along the interface, the chloride product would just mix into the alcohol layer, with no visible change.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Please share the reference you've used
              $endgroup$
              – StackUpPhysics
              Aug 13 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              I had no specific reference in mind, just general knowledge. The other answer is more complete than anything I had in mind.
              $endgroup$
              – jeffB
              Aug 13 at 19:34






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              no problem still I appreciate your efforts
              $endgroup$
              – StackUpPhysics
              Aug 14 at 1:14













            3














            3










            3







            $begingroup$

            To get a cloudy "precipitate", you need to dissolve the alcohol in the acid solution. Alcohols get less soluble in water as their chain length increases. By the time you pass 6 carbons, the alcohol itself is more or less insoluble. If it reacts along the interface, the chloride product would just mix into the alcohol layer, with no visible change.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            To get a cloudy "precipitate", you need to dissolve the alcohol in the acid solution. Alcohols get less soluble in water as their chain length increases. By the time you pass 6 carbons, the alcohol itself is more or less insoluble. If it reacts along the interface, the chloride product would just mix into the alcohol layer, with no visible change.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Aug 13 at 16:30









            jeffBjeffB

            1,2213 silver badges10 bronze badges




            1,2213 silver badges10 bronze badges










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Please share the reference you've used
              $endgroup$
              – StackUpPhysics
              Aug 13 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              I had no specific reference in mind, just general knowledge. The other answer is more complete than anything I had in mind.
              $endgroup$
              – jeffB
              Aug 13 at 19:34






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              no problem still I appreciate your efforts
              $endgroup$
              – StackUpPhysics
              Aug 14 at 1:14












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Please share the reference you've used
              $endgroup$
              – StackUpPhysics
              Aug 13 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              I had no specific reference in mind, just general knowledge. The other answer is more complete than anything I had in mind.
              $endgroup$
              – jeffB
              Aug 13 at 19:34






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              no problem still I appreciate your efforts
              $endgroup$
              – StackUpPhysics
              Aug 14 at 1:14







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Please share the reference you've used
            $endgroup$
            – StackUpPhysics
            Aug 13 at 16:33




            $begingroup$
            Please share the reference you've used
            $endgroup$
            – StackUpPhysics
            Aug 13 at 16:33












            $begingroup$
            I had no specific reference in mind, just general knowledge. The other answer is more complete than anything I had in mind.
            $endgroup$
            – jeffB
            Aug 13 at 19:34




            $begingroup$
            I had no specific reference in mind, just general knowledge. The other answer is more complete than anything I had in mind.
            $endgroup$
            – jeffB
            Aug 13 at 19:34




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            no problem still I appreciate your efforts
            $endgroup$
            – StackUpPhysics
            Aug 14 at 1:14




            $begingroup$
            no problem still I appreciate your efforts
            $endgroup$
            – StackUpPhysics
            Aug 14 at 1:14

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119157%2fwhy-is-the-lucas-test-not-recommended-to-differentiate-higher-alcohols%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?