Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)There is two boxes with one with 8 balls and one with 4 ballsdrawing balls from box without replacemntRandom distribution of colored balls into boxes.Optimal Number of White BallsCompute possible outcomes when get balls from a boxPoisson Approximation Problem involving putting balls into boxesCompute expected received balls from boxesput n balls into n boxesA question of probability regarding expectation and variance of a random variable.Distributing 5 distinct balls into 3 distinct boxes
Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?
How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?
What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?
system() function string length limit
Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?
How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?
In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
A pet rabbit called Belle
Problems with Ubuntu mount /tmp
Wall plug outlet change
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
How should I replace vector<uint8_t>::const_iterator in an API?
How many people can fit inside Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?
How to stretch delimiters to envolve matrices inside of a kbordermatrix?
What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?
"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem
Would it be possible to rearrange a dragon's flight muscle to somewhat circumvent the square-cube law?
Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)There is two boxes with one with 8 balls and one with 4 ballsdrawing balls from box without replacemntRandom distribution of colored balls into boxes.Optimal Number of White BallsCompute possible outcomes when get balls from a boxPoisson Approximation Problem involving putting balls into boxesCompute expected received balls from boxesput n balls into n boxesA question of probability regarding expectation and variance of a random variable.Distributing 5 distinct balls into 3 distinct boxes
$begingroup$
- There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.
- Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.
- Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
$1 leq i leq r$. - Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.
I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.
- Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.
- Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
$1 leq i leq r$. - Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.
I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.
- Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.
- Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
$1 leq i leq r$. - Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.
I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
- There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.
- Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.
- Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
$1 leq i leq r$. - Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.
I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.
probability-theory
probability-theory
edited 2 days ago
Felix Marin
68.9k7110147
68.9k7110147
asked 2 days ago
631631
585
585
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: Looks good, thank you!
$endgroup$
– VHarisop
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184022%2fcomputing-the-expectation-of-the-number-of-balls-in-a-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
$endgroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Sean LeeSean Lee
828214
828214
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: Looks good, thank you!
$endgroup$
– VHarisop
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: Looks good, thank you!
$endgroup$
– VHarisop
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
$endgroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
edited 2 days ago
Daniel Schepler
9,3341821
9,3341821
answered 2 days ago
VHarisopVHarisop
1,228421
1,228421
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: Looks good, thank you!
$endgroup$
– VHarisop
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: Looks good, thank you!
$endgroup$
– VHarisop
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: Looks good, thank you!
$endgroup$
– VHarisop
yesterday
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: Looks good, thank you!
$endgroup$
– VHarisop
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
$endgroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
answered 2 days ago
RScrlliRScrlli
761114
761114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184022%2fcomputing-the-expectation-of-the-number-of-balls-in-a-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 days ago