Is it possible to cast 2x Final Payment while sacrificing just one creature? [duplicate]Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?In multiplayer, what happens if a player you're attacking dies before combat damage is dealt?What happens when additional costs can't ultimately be paid, but the spell is on the stack?Triggering “On Cast” Effects When SacrificingSacrificing an attacking creature that should dieTeysa, Orzhov Scion sacrificing one creature multiple times to exhileThorncaster Sliver and Venom Sliver vs. Priority or Lack ThereofSacrificing a creature with 0 toughnessHow does Camouflage interact with “can't be blocked by more than one creature”?Sacrificing a creature - Magic the gatheringSacrificing an opponent's creature
How to set the font color of quantity objects (Version 11.3 vs version 12)?
Help, my Death Star suffers from Kessler syndrome!
Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?
How to verbalise code in Mathematica?
Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics
Does a creature that is immune to a condition still make a saving throw?
Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?
gnu parallel how to use with ffmpeg
Why do computer-science majors learn calculus?
What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `ab,cd` (braces)?
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
Python "triplet" dictionary?
When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
Feels like I am getting dragged in office politics
Why do TACANs not have a symbol for compulsory reporting?
Can fracking help reduce CO2?
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
How can I record the screen and the rear camera on an iPhone simultaneously?
What does "rf" mean in "rfkill"?
Counterexample: a pair of linearly ordered sets that are isomorphic to subsets of the other, but not isomorphic between them
Confused by notation of atomic number Z and mass number A on periodic table of elements
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
Is it possible to cast 2x Final Payment while sacrificing just one creature? [duplicate]
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?In multiplayer, what happens if a player you're attacking dies before combat damage is dealt?What happens when additional costs can't ultimately be paid, but the spell is on the stack?Triggering “On Cast” Effects When SacrificingSacrificing an attacking creature that should dieTeysa, Orzhov Scion sacrificing one creature multiple times to exhileThorncaster Sliver and Venom Sliver vs. Priority or Lack ThereofSacrificing a creature with 0 toughnessHow does Camouflage interact with “can't be blocked by more than one creature”?Sacrificing a creature - Magic the gatheringSacrificing an opponent's creature
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
Situation:
- Player A controls 2 creatures.
- Player B controls 1 creature.
- Player B plays 1x Final Payment and declares his creature as additional cost.
- Before resolving the spell, Player B plays another Final Payment, once again declaring his creature as additional cost.
What happens here?
- Option 1: Only the second Final Payment is executed since the additional costs for the previously casted spell aren't paid.
- Option 2: Both creatures of Player A are destroyed while Player B only sacrificed one creature.
I suppose it's option 1 but we had a draft the other day where my opponent claimed that option 2 would be correct.
magic-the-gathering
New contributor
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Apr 25 at 17:14
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
Situation:
- Player A controls 2 creatures.
- Player B controls 1 creature.
- Player B plays 1x Final Payment and declares his creature as additional cost.
- Before resolving the spell, Player B plays another Final Payment, once again declaring his creature as additional cost.
What happens here?
- Option 1: Only the second Final Payment is executed since the additional costs for the previously casted spell aren't paid.
- Option 2: Both creatures of Player A are destroyed while Player B only sacrificed one creature.
I suppose it's option 1 but we had a draft the other day where my opponent claimed that option 2 would be correct.
magic-the-gathering
New contributor
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Apr 25 at 17:14
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
Situation:
- Player A controls 2 creatures.
- Player B controls 1 creature.
- Player B plays 1x Final Payment and declares his creature as additional cost.
- Before resolving the spell, Player B plays another Final Payment, once again declaring his creature as additional cost.
What happens here?
- Option 1: Only the second Final Payment is executed since the additional costs for the previously casted spell aren't paid.
- Option 2: Both creatures of Player A are destroyed while Player B only sacrificed one creature.
I suppose it's option 1 but we had a draft the other day where my opponent claimed that option 2 would be correct.
magic-the-gathering
New contributor
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
Situation:
- Player A controls 2 creatures.
- Player B controls 1 creature.
- Player B plays 1x Final Payment and declares his creature as additional cost.
- Before resolving the spell, Player B plays another Final Payment, once again declaring his creature as additional cost.
What happens here?
- Option 1: Only the second Final Payment is executed since the additional costs for the previously casted spell aren't paid.
- Option 2: Both creatures of Player A are destroyed while Player B only sacrificed one creature.
I suppose it's option 1 but we had a draft the other day where my opponent claimed that option 2 would be correct.
This question already has an answer here:
Can I pay two different costs with the same payment?
2 answers
magic-the-gathering
magic-the-gathering
New contributor
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 25 at 8:01
bautista
New contributor
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 25 at 7:14
bautistabautista
334
334
New contributor
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
bautista is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Apr 25 at 17:14
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Apr 25 at 17:14
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
Apr 25 at 7:26
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
Apr 25 at 7:28
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
Apr 25 at 15:10
add a comment |
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
Apr 25 at 7:26
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
Apr 25 at 7:28
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
Apr 25 at 15:10
add a comment |
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
Apr 25 at 7:26
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
Apr 25 at 7:28
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
Apr 25 at 15:10
add a comment |
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
Step 4. is not possible; sacrificing the creature is part of the cost of the spell, so it is done while the spell is cast, not when it resolves. Player B just cannot play the second Final Payment and the card stays in his/her hand; only the first Final Payment is executed.
117.8. Some spells and abilities have additional costs. An additional cost is a cost listed in a spell's rules text, or applied to a spell or ability from another effect, that its controller must pay at the same time they pay the spell's mana cost or the ability's activation cost. Note that some additional costs are listed in keywords; see rule 702.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed (see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
answered Apr 25 at 7:18
GlorfindelGlorfindel
6,79112147
6,79112147
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
Apr 25 at 7:26
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
Apr 25 at 7:28
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
Apr 25 at 15:10
add a comment |
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
Apr 25 at 7:26
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
Apr 25 at 7:28
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
Apr 25 at 15:10
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
Apr 25 at 7:26
thanks for the fast and profound answer. Just to clarify: Would player A be able to destroy the creature of player B with, let's say Cast Down in response to Final Payment, making it have no legal target? I guess not since you have to pay the additional costs at the time of casting final payment, or am I wrong here?
– bautista
Apr 25 at 7:26
1
1
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
Apr 25 at 7:28
As soon as Player B has priority, they can announce Final Payment, and it's too late to cast Cast Down.
– Glorfindel
Apr 25 at 7:28
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
Apr 25 at 15:10
It might be helpful to contrast with situations where the sacrifice isn't "an additional cost to cast", like "Accursed Centaur"
– Yakk
Apr 25 at 15:10
add a comment |
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
add a comment |
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
add a comment |
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
601.2. To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it will
eventually resolve and have its effect. Casting a spell includes
proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a-d) and determination and payment
of costs (rules 601.2f-h). To cast a spell, a player follows the steps
listed below, in order. A player must be legally allowed to cast the
spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). If, at any point during
the casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the
steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal; the game
returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed
(see rule 721, "Handling Illegal Actions").
As per the rules, do you ever cast a spell and wait for it to resolve before you tap your mana? or does the spell only go on the stack when you pay for the mana?
The rules clearly say that you need to meet all of the casting costs, so if you want to cast Final Payment you need to have all of the costs to cast it, this means, if your life is at 4 an you control no creatures you are unable to cast it, even if your opponent was to take over your turn (by the means of cards like emrakul, the promised end or such) and tried to cast Final Payment to for you to lose the game, they would be unable to unless your life was at 5 or you controlled a creature.
There is no time between announcing that you want to cast a spell and paying for the spell costs.*
This is also the reason why if you cast Final Payment and while it is on the stack you cast the expansion side of Expansion // Explosion you would copy Final Payment without having to pay the additional cost, this is because the card is already on the stack and all casting costs have been met, and copying it is the same as copying any other such spells.
This is the same for any other copy effects.
*There is a window of time there, to activate mana abilities, this is what allows you to use Llanowar elves ability without having to do it before announcing that you want to cast the spell and to tap lands. This is usually disregarded as nothing can be done in this time, but there was a deck that abused this fact in modern not to long ago so I thought I'd mention it.
answered Apr 25 at 12:05
fireshark519fireshark519
3816
3816
add a comment |
add a comment |