Is “$limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$” another way of expressing the right-sided limit? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Limit $mathop lim limits_n to infty fracnleft( a_1…a_n right)^frac1na_1 + … + a_n$Evaluating $lim limits_x to inftyleft(fracf(x_0 + frac 1x)f(x_0 - frac 1x)right)^x$How can I prove $lim limits_n to inftyleft(1+frac1a_nright)^a_n=e$ without involving function limit?why is $limlimits_ktoinftyfrac1+kk^k=0?$limit $ lim limits_n to infty left(fracz^1/sqrt n + z^-1/sqrt n2right)^n $Prove $limlimits_x to +infty fracf(x)x = limlimits_x to +infty f'(x)$ if both limits existDoes, $mathop lim limits_x to +infty f'(x) = + infty Leftrightarrow mathop lim limits_x to +infty fracf(x)x = + infty $?Formal limit definition in $limlimits_xto+infty fracx^2+29x=+infty$How can I prove that $limlimits_x to x_0 left|fracf(x)g(x)right| = infty$ when working with punctured neighborhoods?Calculate the limit $lim limits_ x to infty left(fracx^2+1x-1right)$

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?

How does TikZ render an arc?

Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?

What is a more techy Technical Writer job title that isn't cutesy or confusing?

Why are current probes so expensive?

How do you cope with tons of web fonts when copying and pasting from web pages?

First paper to introduce the "principal-agent problem"

How do you write "wild blueberries flavored"?

Is there night in Alpha Complex?

Proving that any solution to the differential equation of an oscillator can be written as a sum of sinusoids.

Why can't fire hurt Daenerys but it did to Jon Snow in season 1?

Is the Mordenkainen's Sword spell underpowered?

By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?

Is there a spell that can create a permanent fire?

How do I say "this must not happen"?

Getting representations of the Lie group out of representations of its Lie algebra

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?

How to get a flat-head nail out of a piece of wood?

Shimano 105 brifters (5800) and Avid BB5 compatibility

Improvising over quartal voicings

How does the body cool itself in a stillsuit?

Twin's vs. Twins'



Is “$limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$” another way of expressing the right-sided limit?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Limit $mathop lim limits_n to infty fracnleft( a_1…a_n right)^frac1na_1 + … + a_n$Evaluating $lim limits_x to inftyleft(fracf(x_0 + frac 1x)f(x_0 - frac 1x)right)^x$How can I prove $lim limits_n to inftyleft(1+frac1a_nright)^a_n=e$ without involving function limit?why is $limlimits_ktoinftyfrac1+kk^k=0?$limit $ lim limits_n to infty left(fracz^1/sqrt n + z^-1/sqrt n2right)^n $Prove $limlimits_x to +infty fracf(x)x = limlimits_x to +infty f'(x)$ if both limits existDoes, $mathop lim limits_x to +infty f'(x) = + infty Leftrightarrow mathop lim limits_x to +infty fracf(x)x = + infty $?Formal limit definition in $limlimits_xto+infty fracx^2+29x=+infty$How can I prove that $limlimits_x to x_0 left|fracf(x)g(x)right| = infty$ when working with punctured neighborhoods?Calculate the limit $lim limits_ x to infty left(fracx^2+1x-1right)$










0












$begingroup$


Let $f:mathbbR to mathbbR$. Can we say that $limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$ is another way of expressing the right-sided limit at $x_0$?

I tried to use the definition of the limit,but I am stuck.Intuitively, it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $f:mathbbR to mathbbR$. Can we say that $limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$ is another way of expressing the right-sided limit at $x_0$?

    I tried to use the definition of the limit,but I am stuck.Intuitively, it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $f:mathbbR to mathbbR$. Can we say that $limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$ is another way of expressing the right-sided limit at $x_0$?

      I tried to use the definition of the limit,but I am stuck.Intuitively, it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $f:mathbbR to mathbbR$. Can we say that $limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$ is another way of expressing the right-sided limit at $x_0$?

      I tried to use the definition of the limit,but I am stuck.Intuitively, it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it.







      real-analysis limits definition






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      user21820

      40.4k544163




      40.4k544163










      asked 2 days ago









      Math GuyMath Guy

      1607




      1607




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            2 days ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – Math Guy
            2 days ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            2 days ago



















          6












          $begingroup$

          No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193405%2fis-lim-limits-n-to-inftyfx-0-frac1n-l-another-way-of-expressing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            10












            $begingroup$

            No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – Math Guy
              2 days ago







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              2 days ago
















            10












            $begingroup$

            No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – Math Guy
              2 days ago







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              2 days ago














            10












            10








            10





            $begingroup$

            No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago

























            answered 2 days ago









            José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

            176k24137247




            176k24137247







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – Math Guy
              2 days ago







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              2 days ago













            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – Math Guy
              2 days ago







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              2 days ago








            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            2 days ago




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            2 days ago












            $begingroup$
            @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – Math Guy
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – Math Guy
            2 days ago





            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            2 days ago












            6












            $begingroup$

            No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              6












              $begingroup$

              No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                6












                6








                6





                $begingroup$

                No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                76.7k53471




                76.7k53471



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193405%2fis-lim-limits-n-to-inftyfx-0-frac1n-l-another-way-of-expressing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                    Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                    Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?