What is the meaning of 'breadth' in breadth first search? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Unique path in a directed graphWhen would best first search be worse than breadth first search?Dijkstra algorithm vs breadth first search for shortest path in graphHow do we generate a depth-first forest from the Depth First Search?Time complexity of Depth First SearchBreadth First Search actually require specifically Queue instead of any other type of Collection?Understanding connection between minimum spanning tree, shortest path, breadth first and depth first traversalProof that G is a Tree After DFS and BFS form the same tree TDijkstra’s versus Lowest-cost-first (best first), resolving some contradictions regarding complexity analysisIs Breadth First Search Space Complexity on a Grid different?
Besides transaction validation, are there any other uses of the Script language in Bitcoin
Why complex landing gears are used instead of simple, reliable and light weight muscle wire or shape memory alloys?
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
Is there a verb for listening stealthily?
How to resize main filesystem
How does TikZ render an arc?
"Destructive power" carried by a B-52?
Determine whether an integer is a palindrome
Marquee sign letters
Why are current probes so expensive?
Russian equivalents of おしゃれは足元から (Every good outfit starts with the shoes)
Problem with display of presentation
Vertical ranges of Column Plots in 12
Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5;
Centre cell vertically in tabularx
Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?
One-one communication
Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?
Inverse square law not accurate for non-point masses?
Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?
How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics
Baking rewards as operations
An isoperimetric-type inequality inside a cube
Any stored/leased 737s that could substitute for grounded MAXs?
What is the meaning of 'breadth' in breadth first search?
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Unique path in a directed graphWhen would best first search be worse than breadth first search?Dijkstra algorithm vs breadth first search for shortest path in graphHow do we generate a depth-first forest from the Depth First Search?Time complexity of Depth First SearchBreadth First Search actually require specifically Queue instead of any other type of Collection?Understanding connection between minimum spanning tree, shortest path, breadth first and depth first traversalProof that G is a Tree After DFS and BFS form the same tree TDijkstra’s versus Lowest-cost-first (best first), resolving some contradictions regarding complexity analysisIs Breadth First Search Space Complexity on a Grid different?
$begingroup$
I was learning about breadth first search and a question came in my mind that why BFS is called so. In the book Introduction to Algorithms by CLRS, I read the following reason for this:
Breadth-first search is so named because it expands the frontier
between discovered and undiscovered vertices uniformly across the
breadth of the frontier.
However, I'm not able to understand the meaning of this statement. I'm confused about this word "frontier" and breadth of that frontier.
So, can someone please answer this question in a way which is easy to understand for a beginner like me?
graphs graph-theory shortest-path graph-traversal
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was learning about breadth first search and a question came in my mind that why BFS is called so. In the book Introduction to Algorithms by CLRS, I read the following reason for this:
Breadth-first search is so named because it expands the frontier
between discovered and undiscovered vertices uniformly across the
breadth of the frontier.
However, I'm not able to understand the meaning of this statement. I'm confused about this word "frontier" and breadth of that frontier.
So, can someone please answer this question in a way which is easy to understand for a beginner like me?
graphs graph-theory shortest-path graph-traversal
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
In case some readers are not familiar with the meaning of the English word (outside of its usage as part of this technical term): merriam-webster.com/dictionary/breadth or dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/breadth . It's similar to "width", a different dimension than "depth" if you're talking about the size/shape of a physical object. And in the metaphorical sense like depth of knowledge (expert on one subject) vs. breadth of knowledge (lots of subjects).
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was learning about breadth first search and a question came in my mind that why BFS is called so. In the book Introduction to Algorithms by CLRS, I read the following reason for this:
Breadth-first search is so named because it expands the frontier
between discovered and undiscovered vertices uniformly across the
breadth of the frontier.
However, I'm not able to understand the meaning of this statement. I'm confused about this word "frontier" and breadth of that frontier.
So, can someone please answer this question in a way which is easy to understand for a beginner like me?
graphs graph-theory shortest-path graph-traversal
$endgroup$
I was learning about breadth first search and a question came in my mind that why BFS is called so. In the book Introduction to Algorithms by CLRS, I read the following reason for this:
Breadth-first search is so named because it expands the frontier
between discovered and undiscovered vertices uniformly across the
breadth of the frontier.
However, I'm not able to understand the meaning of this statement. I'm confused about this word "frontier" and breadth of that frontier.
So, can someone please answer this question in a way which is easy to understand for a beginner like me?
graphs graph-theory shortest-path graph-traversal
graphs graph-theory shortest-path graph-traversal
edited 2 days ago
DG4
asked 2 days ago
DG4DG4
1667
1667
4
$begingroup$
In case some readers are not familiar with the meaning of the English word (outside of its usage as part of this technical term): merriam-webster.com/dictionary/breadth or dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/breadth . It's similar to "width", a different dimension than "depth" if you're talking about the size/shape of a physical object. And in the metaphorical sense like depth of knowledge (expert on one subject) vs. breadth of knowledge (lots of subjects).
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
In case some readers are not familiar with the meaning of the English word (outside of its usage as part of this technical term): merriam-webster.com/dictionary/breadth or dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/breadth . It's similar to "width", a different dimension than "depth" if you're talking about the size/shape of a physical object. And in the metaphorical sense like depth of knowledge (expert on one subject) vs. breadth of knowledge (lots of subjects).
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
4
4
$begingroup$
In case some readers are not familiar with the meaning of the English word (outside of its usage as part of this technical term): merriam-webster.com/dictionary/breadth or dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/breadth . It's similar to "width", a different dimension than "depth" if you're talking about the size/shape of a physical object. And in the metaphorical sense like depth of knowledge (expert on one subject) vs. breadth of knowledge (lots of subjects).
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
$begingroup$
In case some readers are not familiar with the meaning of the English word (outside of its usage as part of this technical term): merriam-webster.com/dictionary/breadth or dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/breadth . It's similar to "width", a different dimension than "depth" if you're talking about the size/shape of a physical object. And in the metaphorical sense like depth of knowledge (expert on one subject) vs. breadth of knowledge (lots of subjects).
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the data structure used to represent the search. In a BFS, you use a queue. If you come across an unseen node, you add it to the queue.
The “frontier” is the set of all nodes in the search data structure. The queue will will iterate through all nodes on the frontier sequentially, thus iterating across the breadth of the frontier. DFS will always pop the most recently discovered state off of the stack, thus always iterating over the deepest part of the frontier.
Consider the image below. Notice how the DFS goes straight to the deepest parts of the tree whereas BFS iterates over the breadth of each level.
Image here
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think the word frontier might refer to the edge of the discovered nodes. When you've only discovereda
, the frontier isa
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
, the frontier isb
,c
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
,d
,e
,f
,g
, the frontier isd
,e
,f
,g
. In other words, the nodes that have been discovered and that we haven't searched beyond yet.
$endgroup$
– Theodoros Chatzigiannakis
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think this is a fair point, but I think that “frontier” can be interpreted multiple ways, with the general explanation above still working.
$endgroup$
– Bryce Kille
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The quote you gives says "the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices". So that's the frontier the author is talking about: the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices. You have some vertices that you haven't seen anything at all yet. You also have some vertices for which you've seen everything for. And then you have vertices in between. These are vertices that you've looked at, but you haven't loaded all of their children yet. This is the frontier.
The discusses this further on:
To keep track of progress BFS colors each vertex white, gray, or black. All vertices start out white and may later become gray and then black. The vertex is discovered the first time it is encountered during the search, at which time it becomes non-white. Gray and black vertices, therefore, have been discovered, but BFS distinguishes between them to ensure that the search proceeds in a BF manner.
...
each vertex is initially white, is grayed when it is discovered in the search, and is blacked when it is finished, that is, when its adjacency list has been examined completely.
So all vertices start out white (undiscovered). When a node is discovered, it's colored gray (frontier). When everything it points to has been discovered, it's colored black (completely discovered). The frontier is the set of points that have been discovered, but have undiscovered children.
Suppose you are looking for something on website. You first go to the main page. Suppose that's labelled "animals". The frontier is currently "animals". You look through the main page and don't see what you are looking for. But you notice that it has links to two more pages, "quadrupeds" and "worms". So you click on the link to "quadrupeds". Now the frontier is "animals","quadrupeds". You look through "quadrupeds" and don't find what you're look for. What do you do next? You can either look for links on "quadrupeds" and follow those, or go back to "animals" and click on the link to "worms". The first is a depth-first search, and the second is a breadth-first search.
"depth" refers to how many links from the root node it takes to get to a node, while "breadth" refers to nodes as the same depth. In the example above, BFS starts at "animals" and first looks at all the nodes of depth one, so it looks at "quadrupeds" and "worms" first. After it has looked at all the depth-1 nodes, its expands the frontier across all of those nodes; that is, it looks at the children of all of the depth-1 nodes before looking at any of the children of depth-2 nodes. So, for instance, if one of the links on the "quadrupeds" page is "primates", it will look at all of the links on the "worms" page before it looks at any of the links on the "primates" page.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107187%2fwhat-is-the-meaning-of-breadth-in-breadth-first-search%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the data structure used to represent the search. In a BFS, you use a queue. If you come across an unseen node, you add it to the queue.
The “frontier” is the set of all nodes in the search data structure. The queue will will iterate through all nodes on the frontier sequentially, thus iterating across the breadth of the frontier. DFS will always pop the most recently discovered state off of the stack, thus always iterating over the deepest part of the frontier.
Consider the image below. Notice how the DFS goes straight to the deepest parts of the tree whereas BFS iterates over the breadth of each level.
Image here
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think the word frontier might refer to the edge of the discovered nodes. When you've only discovereda
, the frontier isa
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
, the frontier isb
,c
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
,d
,e
,f
,g
, the frontier isd
,e
,f
,g
. In other words, the nodes that have been discovered and that we haven't searched beyond yet.
$endgroup$
– Theodoros Chatzigiannakis
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think this is a fair point, but I think that “frontier” can be interpreted multiple ways, with the general explanation above still working.
$endgroup$
– Bryce Kille
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the data structure used to represent the search. In a BFS, you use a queue. If you come across an unseen node, you add it to the queue.
The “frontier” is the set of all nodes in the search data structure. The queue will will iterate through all nodes on the frontier sequentially, thus iterating across the breadth of the frontier. DFS will always pop the most recently discovered state off of the stack, thus always iterating over the deepest part of the frontier.
Consider the image below. Notice how the DFS goes straight to the deepest parts of the tree whereas BFS iterates over the breadth of each level.
Image here
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think the word frontier might refer to the edge of the discovered nodes. When you've only discovereda
, the frontier isa
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
, the frontier isb
,c
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
,d
,e
,f
,g
, the frontier isd
,e
,f
,g
. In other words, the nodes that have been discovered and that we haven't searched beyond yet.
$endgroup$
– Theodoros Chatzigiannakis
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think this is a fair point, but I think that “frontier” can be interpreted multiple ways, with the general explanation above still working.
$endgroup$
– Bryce Kille
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the data structure used to represent the search. In a BFS, you use a queue. If you come across an unseen node, you add it to the queue.
The “frontier” is the set of all nodes in the search data structure. The queue will will iterate through all nodes on the frontier sequentially, thus iterating across the breadth of the frontier. DFS will always pop the most recently discovered state off of the stack, thus always iterating over the deepest part of the frontier.
Consider the image below. Notice how the DFS goes straight to the deepest parts of the tree whereas BFS iterates over the breadth of each level.
Image here
New contributor
$endgroup$
Consider the data structure used to represent the search. In a BFS, you use a queue. If you come across an unseen node, you add it to the queue.
The “frontier” is the set of all nodes in the search data structure. The queue will will iterate through all nodes on the frontier sequentially, thus iterating across the breadth of the frontier. DFS will always pop the most recently discovered state off of the stack, thus always iterating over the deepest part of the frontier.
Consider the image below. Notice how the DFS goes straight to the deepest parts of the tree whereas BFS iterates over the breadth of each level.
Image here
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Bryce KilleBryce Kille
363111
363111
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
I think the word frontier might refer to the edge of the discovered nodes. When you've only discovereda
, the frontier isa
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
, the frontier isb
,c
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
,d
,e
,f
,g
, the frontier isd
,e
,f
,g
. In other words, the nodes that have been discovered and that we haven't searched beyond yet.
$endgroup$
– Theodoros Chatzigiannakis
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think this is a fair point, but I think that “frontier” can be interpreted multiple ways, with the general explanation above still working.
$endgroup$
– Bryce Kille
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I think the word frontier might refer to the edge of the discovered nodes. When you've only discovereda
, the frontier isa
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
, the frontier isb
,c
. When you've discovereda
,b
,c
,d
,e
,f
,g
, the frontier isd
,e
,f
,g
. In other words, the nodes that have been discovered and that we haven't searched beyond yet.
$endgroup$
– Theodoros Chatzigiannakis
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think this is a fair point, but I think that “frontier” can be interpreted multiple ways, with the general explanation above still working.
$endgroup$
– Bryce Kille
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
I think the word frontier might refer to the edge of the discovered nodes. When you've only discovered
a
, the frontier is a
. When you've discovered a
, b
, c
, the frontier is b
, c
. When you've discovered a
, b
, c
, d
, e
, f
, g
, the frontier is d
, e
, f
, g
. In other words, the nodes that have been discovered and that we haven't searched beyond yet.$endgroup$
– Theodoros Chatzigiannakis
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think the word frontier might refer to the edge of the discovered nodes. When you've only discovered
a
, the frontier is a
. When you've discovered a
, b
, c
, the frontier is b
, c
. When you've discovered a
, b
, c
, d
, e
, f
, g
, the frontier is d
, e
, f
, g
. In other words, the nodes that have been discovered and that we haven't searched beyond yet.$endgroup$
– Theodoros Chatzigiannakis
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think this is a fair point, but I think that “frontier” can be interpreted multiple ways, with the general explanation above still working.
$endgroup$
– Bryce Kille
yesterday
$begingroup$
I think this is a fair point, but I think that “frontier” can be interpreted multiple ways, with the general explanation above still working.
$endgroup$
– Bryce Kille
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The quote you gives says "the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices". So that's the frontier the author is talking about: the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices. You have some vertices that you haven't seen anything at all yet. You also have some vertices for which you've seen everything for. And then you have vertices in between. These are vertices that you've looked at, but you haven't loaded all of their children yet. This is the frontier.
The discusses this further on:
To keep track of progress BFS colors each vertex white, gray, or black. All vertices start out white and may later become gray and then black. The vertex is discovered the first time it is encountered during the search, at which time it becomes non-white. Gray and black vertices, therefore, have been discovered, but BFS distinguishes between them to ensure that the search proceeds in a BF manner.
...
each vertex is initially white, is grayed when it is discovered in the search, and is blacked when it is finished, that is, when its adjacency list has been examined completely.
So all vertices start out white (undiscovered). When a node is discovered, it's colored gray (frontier). When everything it points to has been discovered, it's colored black (completely discovered). The frontier is the set of points that have been discovered, but have undiscovered children.
Suppose you are looking for something on website. You first go to the main page. Suppose that's labelled "animals". The frontier is currently "animals". You look through the main page and don't see what you are looking for. But you notice that it has links to two more pages, "quadrupeds" and "worms". So you click on the link to "quadrupeds". Now the frontier is "animals","quadrupeds". You look through "quadrupeds" and don't find what you're look for. What do you do next? You can either look for links on "quadrupeds" and follow those, or go back to "animals" and click on the link to "worms". The first is a depth-first search, and the second is a breadth-first search.
"depth" refers to how many links from the root node it takes to get to a node, while "breadth" refers to nodes as the same depth. In the example above, BFS starts at "animals" and first looks at all the nodes of depth one, so it looks at "quadrupeds" and "worms" first. After it has looked at all the depth-1 nodes, its expands the frontier across all of those nodes; that is, it looks at the children of all of the depth-1 nodes before looking at any of the children of depth-2 nodes. So, for instance, if one of the links on the "quadrupeds" page is "primates", it will look at all of the links on the "worms" page before it looks at any of the links on the "primates" page.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The quote you gives says "the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices". So that's the frontier the author is talking about: the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices. You have some vertices that you haven't seen anything at all yet. You also have some vertices for which you've seen everything for. And then you have vertices in between. These are vertices that you've looked at, but you haven't loaded all of their children yet. This is the frontier.
The discusses this further on:
To keep track of progress BFS colors each vertex white, gray, or black. All vertices start out white and may later become gray and then black. The vertex is discovered the first time it is encountered during the search, at which time it becomes non-white. Gray and black vertices, therefore, have been discovered, but BFS distinguishes between them to ensure that the search proceeds in a BF manner.
...
each vertex is initially white, is grayed when it is discovered in the search, and is blacked when it is finished, that is, when its adjacency list has been examined completely.
So all vertices start out white (undiscovered). When a node is discovered, it's colored gray (frontier). When everything it points to has been discovered, it's colored black (completely discovered). The frontier is the set of points that have been discovered, but have undiscovered children.
Suppose you are looking for something on website. You first go to the main page. Suppose that's labelled "animals". The frontier is currently "animals". You look through the main page and don't see what you are looking for. But you notice that it has links to two more pages, "quadrupeds" and "worms". So you click on the link to "quadrupeds". Now the frontier is "animals","quadrupeds". You look through "quadrupeds" and don't find what you're look for. What do you do next? You can either look for links on "quadrupeds" and follow those, or go back to "animals" and click on the link to "worms". The first is a depth-first search, and the second is a breadth-first search.
"depth" refers to how many links from the root node it takes to get to a node, while "breadth" refers to nodes as the same depth. In the example above, BFS starts at "animals" and first looks at all the nodes of depth one, so it looks at "quadrupeds" and "worms" first. After it has looked at all the depth-1 nodes, its expands the frontier across all of those nodes; that is, it looks at the children of all of the depth-1 nodes before looking at any of the children of depth-2 nodes. So, for instance, if one of the links on the "quadrupeds" page is "primates", it will look at all of the links on the "worms" page before it looks at any of the links on the "primates" page.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The quote you gives says "the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices". So that's the frontier the author is talking about: the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices. You have some vertices that you haven't seen anything at all yet. You also have some vertices for which you've seen everything for. And then you have vertices in between. These are vertices that you've looked at, but you haven't loaded all of their children yet. This is the frontier.
The discusses this further on:
To keep track of progress BFS colors each vertex white, gray, or black. All vertices start out white and may later become gray and then black. The vertex is discovered the first time it is encountered during the search, at which time it becomes non-white. Gray and black vertices, therefore, have been discovered, but BFS distinguishes between them to ensure that the search proceeds in a BF manner.
...
each vertex is initially white, is grayed when it is discovered in the search, and is blacked when it is finished, that is, when its adjacency list has been examined completely.
So all vertices start out white (undiscovered). When a node is discovered, it's colored gray (frontier). When everything it points to has been discovered, it's colored black (completely discovered). The frontier is the set of points that have been discovered, but have undiscovered children.
Suppose you are looking for something on website. You first go to the main page. Suppose that's labelled "animals". The frontier is currently "animals". You look through the main page and don't see what you are looking for. But you notice that it has links to two more pages, "quadrupeds" and "worms". So you click on the link to "quadrupeds". Now the frontier is "animals","quadrupeds". You look through "quadrupeds" and don't find what you're look for. What do you do next? You can either look for links on "quadrupeds" and follow those, or go back to "animals" and click on the link to "worms". The first is a depth-first search, and the second is a breadth-first search.
"depth" refers to how many links from the root node it takes to get to a node, while "breadth" refers to nodes as the same depth. In the example above, BFS starts at "animals" and first looks at all the nodes of depth one, so it looks at "quadrupeds" and "worms" first. After it has looked at all the depth-1 nodes, its expands the frontier across all of those nodes; that is, it looks at the children of all of the depth-1 nodes before looking at any of the children of depth-2 nodes. So, for instance, if one of the links on the "quadrupeds" page is "primates", it will look at all of the links on the "worms" page before it looks at any of the links on the "primates" page.
$endgroup$
The quote you gives says "the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices". So that's the frontier the author is talking about: the frontier between discovered and undiscovered vertices. You have some vertices that you haven't seen anything at all yet. You also have some vertices for which you've seen everything for. And then you have vertices in between. These are vertices that you've looked at, but you haven't loaded all of their children yet. This is the frontier.
The discusses this further on:
To keep track of progress BFS colors each vertex white, gray, or black. All vertices start out white and may later become gray and then black. The vertex is discovered the first time it is encountered during the search, at which time it becomes non-white. Gray and black vertices, therefore, have been discovered, but BFS distinguishes between them to ensure that the search proceeds in a BF manner.
...
each vertex is initially white, is grayed when it is discovered in the search, and is blacked when it is finished, that is, when its adjacency list has been examined completely.
So all vertices start out white (undiscovered). When a node is discovered, it's colored gray (frontier). When everything it points to has been discovered, it's colored black (completely discovered). The frontier is the set of points that have been discovered, but have undiscovered children.
Suppose you are looking for something on website. You first go to the main page. Suppose that's labelled "animals". The frontier is currently "animals". You look through the main page and don't see what you are looking for. But you notice that it has links to two more pages, "quadrupeds" and "worms". So you click on the link to "quadrupeds". Now the frontier is "animals","quadrupeds". You look through "quadrupeds" and don't find what you're look for. What do you do next? You can either look for links on "quadrupeds" and follow those, or go back to "animals" and click on the link to "worms". The first is a depth-first search, and the second is a breadth-first search.
"depth" refers to how many links from the root node it takes to get to a node, while "breadth" refers to nodes as the same depth. In the example above, BFS starts at "animals" and first looks at all the nodes of depth one, so it looks at "quadrupeds" and "worms" first. After it has looked at all the depth-1 nodes, its expands the frontier across all of those nodes; that is, it looks at the children of all of the depth-1 nodes before looking at any of the children of depth-2 nodes. So, for instance, if one of the links on the "quadrupeds" page is "primates", it will look at all of the links on the "worms" page before it looks at any of the links on the "primates" page.
answered 2 days ago
AcccumulationAcccumulation
1394
1394
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107187%2fwhat-is-the-meaning-of-breadth-in-breadth-first-search%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
In case some readers are not familiar with the meaning of the English word (outside of its usage as part of this technical term): merriam-webster.com/dictionary/breadth or dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/breadth . It's similar to "width", a different dimension than "depth" if you're talking about the size/shape of a physical object. And in the metaphorical sense like depth of knowledge (expert on one subject) vs. breadth of knowledge (lots of subjects).
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago