Order table by two columns The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSequential joining of tables in orderGroup by + Order by Behavior Explanation?Best way to rank all the columns in a table and store those ranks in another tableSet in mySQL a predefined order for SELECT queries without using the ORDER BY clauseHow do I control order/arrangement of certain columns in a resultset?Transposing hierachical data from one VARCHAR to two INTsHow can I speed up an ASC sort on a column that only holds an integer between 0 and 9 across multiple millions of rows?Mysql: slow down with order by, global database problemORDER BY doesn't use an index on SQL Server if CASE WHEN is presentHow to identify columns order in a table, bis
Can an undergraduate be advised by a professor who is very far away?
Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past
How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?
Why does the nucleus not repel itself?
What does もの mean in this sentence?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
What is this business jet?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
The phrase "to the numbers born"?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Cooking pasta in a water boiler
Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?
Can a flute soloist sit?
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill
How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?
Match Roman Numerals
Order table by two columns
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSequential joining of tables in orderGroup by + Order by Behavior Explanation?Best way to rank all the columns in a table and store those ranks in another tableSet in mySQL a predefined order for SELECT queries without using the ORDER BY clauseHow do I control order/arrangement of certain columns in a resultset?Transposing hierachical data from one VARCHAR to two INTsHow can I speed up an ASC sort on a column that only holds an integer between 0 and 9 across multiple millions of rows?Mysql: slow down with order by, global database problemORDER BY doesn't use an index on SQL Server if CASE WHEN is presentHow to identify columns order in a table, bis
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I would like to order this table but I can not find a way to make it work. Can you help me?
I have this table:
I need this:
I have a table where documents are listed, the first field is the id of the document and the second field represents the father, so I must show a list where you can see in an orderly manner that 242 is the first document and 252 and 335 were generated from the 242.
The query:
select * from table_name order by col1 ASC, Col2 ASC
...doesn't work for me. I do this query:
SELECT
FR1.[report_id],
FR1.[report_parent]
FROM [FARA_reports] FR1
WHERE
FR1.[report_is_delete] <> 1
AND FR1.[report_is_tmp] <> 1
ORDER BY
FR1.[report_id] asc,
FR1.[report_parent] desc
and this is my first image.
sql-server sql-server-2008 order-by
New contributor
add a comment |
I would like to order this table but I can not find a way to make it work. Can you help me?
I have this table:
I need this:
I have a table where documents are listed, the first field is the id of the document and the second field represents the father, so I must show a list where you can see in an orderly manner that 242 is the first document and 252 and 335 were generated from the 242.
The query:
select * from table_name order by col1 ASC, Col2 ASC
...doesn't work for me. I do this query:
SELECT
FR1.[report_id],
FR1.[report_parent]
FROM [FARA_reports] FR1
WHERE
FR1.[report_is_delete] <> 1
AND FR1.[report_is_tmp] <> 1
ORDER BY
FR1.[report_id] asc,
FR1.[report_parent] desc
and this is my first image.
sql-server sql-server-2008 order-by
New contributor
add a comment |
I would like to order this table but I can not find a way to make it work. Can you help me?
I have this table:
I need this:
I have a table where documents are listed, the first field is the id of the document and the second field represents the father, so I must show a list where you can see in an orderly manner that 242 is the first document and 252 and 335 were generated from the 242.
The query:
select * from table_name order by col1 ASC, Col2 ASC
...doesn't work for me. I do this query:
SELECT
FR1.[report_id],
FR1.[report_parent]
FROM [FARA_reports] FR1
WHERE
FR1.[report_is_delete] <> 1
AND FR1.[report_is_tmp] <> 1
ORDER BY
FR1.[report_id] asc,
FR1.[report_parent] desc
and this is my first image.
sql-server sql-server-2008 order-by
New contributor
I would like to order this table but I can not find a way to make it work. Can you help me?
I have this table:
I need this:
I have a table where documents are listed, the first field is the id of the document and the second field represents the father, so I must show a list where you can see in an orderly manner that 242 is the first document and 252 and 335 were generated from the 242.
The query:
select * from table_name order by col1 ASC, Col2 ASC
...doesn't work for me. I do this query:
SELECT
FR1.[report_id],
FR1.[report_parent]
FROM [FARA_reports] FR1
WHERE
FR1.[report_is_delete] <> 1
AND FR1.[report_is_tmp] <> 1
ORDER BY
FR1.[report_id] asc,
FR1.[report_parent] desc
and this is my first image.
sql-server sql-server-2008 order-by
sql-server sql-server-2008 order-by
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Paul White♦
54.2k14288461
54.2k14288461
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Liliana del Carmen CastellanosLiliana del Carmen Castellanos
182
182
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Another option:
select a, b
from t
order by
case when a < b or b is null then a else b end,
case when a < b or b is null then b else a end ;
Test in dbfiddle.uk.
Can't you just order byisnull(id2, id1), id2
?
– bendataclear
yesterday
1
@bendtaclear yes. When I wrote the answer, it wasn't clear that first column can never be null.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
yesterday
These really work for me :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
add a comment |
Your data:
CREATE TABLE dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
(
ID1 INT NULL,
ID2 INT NULL
);
INSERT INTO dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING VALUES
(242, NULL),
(243, NULL),
(244, NULL),
(252, 242),
(254, NULL),
(255, NULL),
(256, NULL),
(292, NULL),
(308, NULL),
(311, NULL),
(313, 311),
(314, 311),
(323, NULL),
(324, 311),
(335, 242),
(340, NULL),
(341, NULL),
(358, NULL),
(372, NULL),
(373, NULL),
(377, NULL),
(378, 358),
(379, 358),
(380, 358),
(381, 358);
This gives you results in the desired order:
SELECT ID1, ID2
FROM
(
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID1 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 <= ID2 OR ID2 IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID2 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 > ID2 OR ID1 IS NULL
) q
ORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN;
db fiddle
Thank you so much. You are AWESOME!! :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
This doesn't quite work, if you reorder your input data from(313, 311), (314, 311)
to(314, 311),(313, 311)
it comes out in the wrong order, I suggest updating the order by statement to beORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN, ID1
to fix that
– Xynos
yesterday
@Xynos feel free to edit
– Joe Obbish
yesterday
add a comment |
Stealing the sql fiddle table from Joe Obbish this is a simple solution
SELECT * FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
ORDER BY coalesce(ID2*1000+1, ID1*1000)
New contributor
add a comment |
SELECT *
FROM datatable
ORDER BY CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN field1 ELSE field2 END, -- sort groups
CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, -- move parent first
field2 -- sort childs
add a comment |
All answers so far rely on an assumption that there are no further levels of "generated from" (e.g. there is no 382 generated from the 381 which is itself generated from 352 - or which was it).
They should know what is said of "assume", so they should have asked you about this first.
If you can indeed have further levels of "generated from", then you need a recursive query to do the full path construction ("352" , "352/381" , "352/381/382" , etc etc) and ORDER BY that full path.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Liliana del Carmen Castellanos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234368%2forder-table-by-two-columns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Another option:
select a, b
from t
order by
case when a < b or b is null then a else b end,
case when a < b or b is null then b else a end ;
Test in dbfiddle.uk.
Can't you just order byisnull(id2, id1), id2
?
– bendataclear
yesterday
1
@bendtaclear yes. When I wrote the answer, it wasn't clear that first column can never be null.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
yesterday
These really work for me :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
add a comment |
Another option:
select a, b
from t
order by
case when a < b or b is null then a else b end,
case when a < b or b is null then b else a end ;
Test in dbfiddle.uk.
Can't you just order byisnull(id2, id1), id2
?
– bendataclear
yesterday
1
@bendtaclear yes. When I wrote the answer, it wasn't clear that first column can never be null.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
yesterday
These really work for me :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
add a comment |
Another option:
select a, b
from t
order by
case when a < b or b is null then a else b end,
case when a < b or b is null then b else a end ;
Test in dbfiddle.uk.
Another option:
select a, b
from t
order by
case when a < b or b is null then a else b end,
case when a < b or b is null then b else a end ;
Test in dbfiddle.uk.
answered yesterday
ypercubeᵀᴹypercubeᵀᴹ
78.5k11137221
78.5k11137221
Can't you just order byisnull(id2, id1), id2
?
– bendataclear
yesterday
1
@bendtaclear yes. When I wrote the answer, it wasn't clear that first column can never be null.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
yesterday
These really work for me :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
add a comment |
Can't you just order byisnull(id2, id1), id2
?
– bendataclear
yesterday
1
@bendtaclear yes. When I wrote the answer, it wasn't clear that first column can never be null.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
yesterday
These really work for me :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
Can't you just order by
isnull(id2, id1), id2
?– bendataclear
yesterday
Can't you just order by
isnull(id2, id1), id2
?– bendataclear
yesterday
1
1
@bendtaclear yes. When I wrote the answer, it wasn't clear that first column can never be null.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
yesterday
@bendtaclear yes. When I wrote the answer, it wasn't clear that first column can never be null.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
yesterday
These really work for me :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
These really work for me :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
add a comment |
Your data:
CREATE TABLE dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
(
ID1 INT NULL,
ID2 INT NULL
);
INSERT INTO dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING VALUES
(242, NULL),
(243, NULL),
(244, NULL),
(252, 242),
(254, NULL),
(255, NULL),
(256, NULL),
(292, NULL),
(308, NULL),
(311, NULL),
(313, 311),
(314, 311),
(323, NULL),
(324, 311),
(335, 242),
(340, NULL),
(341, NULL),
(358, NULL),
(372, NULL),
(373, NULL),
(377, NULL),
(378, 358),
(379, 358),
(380, 358),
(381, 358);
This gives you results in the desired order:
SELECT ID1, ID2
FROM
(
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID1 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 <= ID2 OR ID2 IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID2 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 > ID2 OR ID1 IS NULL
) q
ORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN;
db fiddle
Thank you so much. You are AWESOME!! :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
This doesn't quite work, if you reorder your input data from(313, 311), (314, 311)
to(314, 311),(313, 311)
it comes out in the wrong order, I suggest updating the order by statement to beORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN, ID1
to fix that
– Xynos
yesterday
@Xynos feel free to edit
– Joe Obbish
yesterday
add a comment |
Your data:
CREATE TABLE dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
(
ID1 INT NULL,
ID2 INT NULL
);
INSERT INTO dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING VALUES
(242, NULL),
(243, NULL),
(244, NULL),
(252, 242),
(254, NULL),
(255, NULL),
(256, NULL),
(292, NULL),
(308, NULL),
(311, NULL),
(313, 311),
(314, 311),
(323, NULL),
(324, 311),
(335, 242),
(340, NULL),
(341, NULL),
(358, NULL),
(372, NULL),
(373, NULL),
(377, NULL),
(378, 358),
(379, 358),
(380, 358),
(381, 358);
This gives you results in the desired order:
SELECT ID1, ID2
FROM
(
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID1 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 <= ID2 OR ID2 IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID2 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 > ID2 OR ID1 IS NULL
) q
ORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN;
db fiddle
Thank you so much. You are AWESOME!! :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
This doesn't quite work, if you reorder your input data from(313, 311), (314, 311)
to(314, 311),(313, 311)
it comes out in the wrong order, I suggest updating the order by statement to beORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN, ID1
to fix that
– Xynos
yesterday
@Xynos feel free to edit
– Joe Obbish
yesterday
add a comment |
Your data:
CREATE TABLE dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
(
ID1 INT NULL,
ID2 INT NULL
);
INSERT INTO dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING VALUES
(242, NULL),
(243, NULL),
(244, NULL),
(252, 242),
(254, NULL),
(255, NULL),
(256, NULL),
(292, NULL),
(308, NULL),
(311, NULL),
(313, 311),
(314, 311),
(323, NULL),
(324, 311),
(335, 242),
(340, NULL),
(341, NULL),
(358, NULL),
(372, NULL),
(373, NULL),
(377, NULL),
(378, 358),
(379, 358),
(380, 358),
(381, 358);
This gives you results in the desired order:
SELECT ID1, ID2
FROM
(
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID1 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 <= ID2 OR ID2 IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID2 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 > ID2 OR ID1 IS NULL
) q
ORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN;
db fiddle
Your data:
CREATE TABLE dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
(
ID1 INT NULL,
ID2 INT NULL
);
INSERT INTO dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING VALUES
(242, NULL),
(243, NULL),
(244, NULL),
(252, 242),
(254, NULL),
(255, NULL),
(256, NULL),
(292, NULL),
(308, NULL),
(311, NULL),
(313, 311),
(314, 311),
(323, NULL),
(324, 311),
(335, 242),
(340, NULL),
(341, NULL),
(358, NULL),
(372, NULL),
(373, NULL),
(377, NULL),
(378, 358),
(379, 358),
(380, 358),
(381, 358);
This gives you results in the desired order:
SELECT ID1, ID2
FROM
(
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID1 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 <= ID2 OR ID2 IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT ID1, ID2, ID2 AS ORDERING_COLUMN
FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
WHERE ID1 > ID2 OR ID1 IS NULL
) q
ORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN;
db fiddle
answered 2 days ago
Joe ObbishJoe Obbish
21.9k43291
21.9k43291
Thank you so much. You are AWESOME!! :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
This doesn't quite work, if you reorder your input data from(313, 311), (314, 311)
to(314, 311),(313, 311)
it comes out in the wrong order, I suggest updating the order by statement to beORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN, ID1
to fix that
– Xynos
yesterday
@Xynos feel free to edit
– Joe Obbish
yesterday
add a comment |
Thank you so much. You are AWESOME!! :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
This doesn't quite work, if you reorder your input data from(313, 311), (314, 311)
to(314, 311),(313, 311)
it comes out in the wrong order, I suggest updating the order by statement to beORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN, ID1
to fix that
– Xynos
yesterday
@Xynos feel free to edit
– Joe Obbish
yesterday
Thank you so much. You are AWESOME!! :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
Thank you so much. You are AWESOME!! :D
– Liliana del Carmen Castellanos
yesterday
This doesn't quite work, if you reorder your input data from
(313, 311), (314, 311)
to (314, 311),(313, 311)
it comes out in the wrong order, I suggest updating the order by statement to be ORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN, ID1
to fix that– Xynos
yesterday
This doesn't quite work, if you reorder your input data from
(313, 311), (314, 311)
to (314, 311),(313, 311)
it comes out in the wrong order, I suggest updating the order by statement to be ORDER BY ORDERING_COLUMN, ID1
to fix that– Xynos
yesterday
@Xynos feel free to edit
– Joe Obbish
yesterday
@Xynos feel free to edit
– Joe Obbish
yesterday
add a comment |
Stealing the sql fiddle table from Joe Obbish this is a simple solution
SELECT * FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
ORDER BY coalesce(ID2*1000+1, ID1*1000)
New contributor
add a comment |
Stealing the sql fiddle table from Joe Obbish this is a simple solution
SELECT * FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
ORDER BY coalesce(ID2*1000+1, ID1*1000)
New contributor
add a comment |
Stealing the sql fiddle table from Joe Obbish this is a simple solution
SELECT * FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
ORDER BY coalesce(ID2*1000+1, ID1*1000)
New contributor
Stealing the sql fiddle table from Joe Obbish this is a simple solution
SELECT * FROM dbo.WEIRD_ORDERING
ORDER BY coalesce(ID2*1000+1, ID1*1000)
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
SpacebenSpaceben
311
311
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
SELECT *
FROM datatable
ORDER BY CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN field1 ELSE field2 END, -- sort groups
CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, -- move parent first
field2 -- sort childs
add a comment |
SELECT *
FROM datatable
ORDER BY CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN field1 ELSE field2 END, -- sort groups
CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, -- move parent first
field2 -- sort childs
add a comment |
SELECT *
FROM datatable
ORDER BY CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN field1 ELSE field2 END, -- sort groups
CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, -- move parent first
field2 -- sort childs
SELECT *
FROM datatable
ORDER BY CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN field1 ELSE field2 END, -- sort groups
CASE WHEN field2 IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, -- move parent first
field2 -- sort childs
answered 2 days ago
AkinaAkina
4,9371311
4,9371311
add a comment |
add a comment |
All answers so far rely on an assumption that there are no further levels of "generated from" (e.g. there is no 382 generated from the 381 which is itself generated from 352 - or which was it).
They should know what is said of "assume", so they should have asked you about this first.
If you can indeed have further levels of "generated from", then you need a recursive query to do the full path construction ("352" , "352/381" , "352/381/382" , etc etc) and ORDER BY that full path.
add a comment |
All answers so far rely on an assumption that there are no further levels of "generated from" (e.g. there is no 382 generated from the 381 which is itself generated from 352 - or which was it).
They should know what is said of "assume", so they should have asked you about this first.
If you can indeed have further levels of "generated from", then you need a recursive query to do the full path construction ("352" , "352/381" , "352/381/382" , etc etc) and ORDER BY that full path.
add a comment |
All answers so far rely on an assumption that there are no further levels of "generated from" (e.g. there is no 382 generated from the 381 which is itself generated from 352 - or which was it).
They should know what is said of "assume", so they should have asked you about this first.
If you can indeed have further levels of "generated from", then you need a recursive query to do the full path construction ("352" , "352/381" , "352/381/382" , etc etc) and ORDER BY that full path.
All answers so far rely on an assumption that there are no further levels of "generated from" (e.g. there is no 382 generated from the 381 which is itself generated from 352 - or which was it).
They should know what is said of "assume", so they should have asked you about this first.
If you can indeed have further levels of "generated from", then you need a recursive query to do the full path construction ("352" , "352/381" , "352/381/382" , etc etc) and ORDER BY that full path.
answered yesterday
Erwin SmoutErwin Smout
1,411712
1,411712
add a comment |
add a comment |
Liliana del Carmen Castellanos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Liliana del Carmen Castellanos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Liliana del Carmen Castellanos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Liliana del Carmen Castellanos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234368%2forder-table-by-two-columns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown