Why weren't the Barons of the Court of Exchequer Barons as peers? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhat were the Government Press Prosecutions of 1858 and why did they occur?Why are lower court jurists, judges, and supreme court jurists, justices?What does it mean that the early supreme court “gave themselves” the power of judicial review?Why is the charter of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations signed “HOWARD”?What influenced the Supreme Court to overrule precedent in Afroyim v. Rusk?Was there ever such a thing as a Court Tory?How did the Supreme Court case Lochner vs. New York influence the U.S. economy?California land cases to the US Supreme CourtWhy was Charles I not pressed by *peine forte et dure* to force him to plead to treason in front of the High Court?Historical Statistical Analysis on the Length of Court Proceedings in the US?

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?

Why does the Cisco show run command not show the full version, while the show version command does?

Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

Will I be more secure with my own router behind my ISP's router?

In search of the origins of term censor, I hit a dead end stuck with the greek term, to censor, λογοκρίνω

Why aren't road bicycle wheels tiny?

Writing a T-SQL stored procedure to receive 4 numbers and insert them into a table

What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?

Where can I find how to tex symbols for different fonts?

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

France's Public Holidays' Puzzle

Simulate round-robin tournament draw

Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?

What is the numbering system used for the DSN dishes?

Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?

Co-worker works way more than he should

My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

How would it unbalance gameplay to rule that Weapon Master allows for picking a fighting style?

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

Does a Draconic Bloodline sorcerer's doubled proficiency bonus for Charisma checks against dragons apply to all dragon types or only the chosen one?

What do you call an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ)?



Why weren't the Barons of the Court of Exchequer Barons as peers?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhat were the Government Press Prosecutions of 1858 and why did they occur?Why are lower court jurists, judges, and supreme court jurists, justices?What does it mean that the early supreme court “gave themselves” the power of judicial review?Why is the charter of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations signed “HOWARD”?What influenced the Supreme Court to overrule precedent in Afroyim v. Rusk?Was there ever such a thing as a Court Tory?How did the Supreme Court case Lochner vs. New York influence the U.S. economy?California land cases to the US Supreme CourtWhy was Charles I not pressed by *peine forte et dure* to force him to plead to treason in front of the High Court?Historical Statistical Analysis on the Length of Court Proceedings in the US?










3















The first sentence at Chief Baron of the Exchequer




The Chief Baron of the Exchequer was the first "baron" (i.e., judge) of the English Exchequer of Pleas.




bemused me: Why were these judges were called "barons"? I looked it up on OED:




enter image description here




The list of all Barons of the Exchequer is incomplete. So I'll refer to the list of Chief Barons:




enter image description here




In the screenshot, nobody were barons except Lyndhurst. So why weren't the (Chief) Barons created baronies? It feels uncomely to be Barons of the Exchequer but not "true" Barons, though I know that UKSC justices are no longer created baronies but remain styled 'Lord' or 'Lady'.










share|improve this question




























    3















    The first sentence at Chief Baron of the Exchequer




    The Chief Baron of the Exchequer was the first "baron" (i.e., judge) of the English Exchequer of Pleas.




    bemused me: Why were these judges were called "barons"? I looked it up on OED:




    enter image description here




    The list of all Barons of the Exchequer is incomplete. So I'll refer to the list of Chief Barons:




    enter image description here




    In the screenshot, nobody were barons except Lyndhurst. So why weren't the (Chief) Barons created baronies? It feels uncomely to be Barons of the Exchequer but not "true" Barons, though I know that UKSC justices are no longer created baronies but remain styled 'Lord' or 'Lady'.










    share|improve this question


























      3












      3








      3








      The first sentence at Chief Baron of the Exchequer




      The Chief Baron of the Exchequer was the first "baron" (i.e., judge) of the English Exchequer of Pleas.




      bemused me: Why were these judges were called "barons"? I looked it up on OED:




      enter image description here




      The list of all Barons of the Exchequer is incomplete. So I'll refer to the list of Chief Barons:




      enter image description here




      In the screenshot, nobody were barons except Lyndhurst. So why weren't the (Chief) Barons created baronies? It feels uncomely to be Barons of the Exchequer but not "true" Barons, though I know that UKSC justices are no longer created baronies but remain styled 'Lord' or 'Lady'.










      share|improve this question
















      The first sentence at Chief Baron of the Exchequer




      The Chief Baron of the Exchequer was the first "baron" (i.e., judge) of the English Exchequer of Pleas.




      bemused me: Why were these judges were called "barons"? I looked it up on OED:




      enter image description here




      The list of all Barons of the Exchequer is incomplete. So I'll refer to the list of Chief Barons:




      enter image description here




      In the screenshot, nobody were barons except Lyndhurst. So why weren't the (Chief) Barons created baronies? It feels uncomely to be Barons of the Exchequer but not "true" Barons, though I know that UKSC justices are no longer created baronies but remain styled 'Lord' or 'Lady'.







      england law






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago







      Greek - Area 51 Proposal

















      asked 2 days ago









      Greek - Area 51 ProposalGreek - Area 51 Proposal

      641617




      641617




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          The short answer is that the members of Court of Exchequer were called Barons because that was members of that court were called.



          The answer is that the titles and court were created in the 1190's when there was no such thing as the House of Lords and titles were not regulated as they were later.
          To show that not all Barons are in the House of Lords. Wikipedia says




          Under King Henry II, the Dialogus de Scaccario already distinguished between greater barons, who held per baroniam by knight's service, and lesser barons, who held manors. Technically, Lords of Manors are barons, or freemen, however they are not entitled to be styled as such. John Selden writes in Titles of Honour, "The word Baro (Latin for Baron) hath been also so much communicated, that not only all Lords of Mannors have been from antient time, and are at this day called sometimes Barons (as in the stile of their Court Barons, which is Curia Baronis, &c. And I have read hors de son Barony in a barr to an Avowry for hors de son fee) But also the Judges of the Exchequer have it from antient time fixed on them."[6]




          The same article continues to say that after Magna Carta the greater barons were summoned to the King's Council which evolved into the House of Lords (and the current definition of Baron) and the
          lesser barons were summoned by choosing members fo a group of them eventually this became House of Commons.



          Thus in Norman era pre 1200 Baron was really just a term for those who had sworn fealty to the king.



          "Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History from the Earliest Times to the Reign of Edward the First (Cambridge Library Collection - Medieval History)" By William Stubbs Amazon.co.uk Google Books shows




          The several members are called ... in the Exchequer barones or barones scaccari, a title that belongs to them even after they have ceased to be chosen from the ranks of the great vassals.







          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "324"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52227%2fwhy-werent-the-barons-of-the-court-of-exchequer-barons-as-peers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            9














            The short answer is that the members of Court of Exchequer were called Barons because that was members of that court were called.



            The answer is that the titles and court were created in the 1190's when there was no such thing as the House of Lords and titles were not regulated as they were later.
            To show that not all Barons are in the House of Lords. Wikipedia says




            Under King Henry II, the Dialogus de Scaccario already distinguished between greater barons, who held per baroniam by knight's service, and lesser barons, who held manors. Technically, Lords of Manors are barons, or freemen, however they are not entitled to be styled as such. John Selden writes in Titles of Honour, "The word Baro (Latin for Baron) hath been also so much communicated, that not only all Lords of Mannors have been from antient time, and are at this day called sometimes Barons (as in the stile of their Court Barons, which is Curia Baronis, &c. And I have read hors de son Barony in a barr to an Avowry for hors de son fee) But also the Judges of the Exchequer have it from antient time fixed on them."[6]




            The same article continues to say that after Magna Carta the greater barons were summoned to the King's Council which evolved into the House of Lords (and the current definition of Baron) and the
            lesser barons were summoned by choosing members fo a group of them eventually this became House of Commons.



            Thus in Norman era pre 1200 Baron was really just a term for those who had sworn fealty to the king.



            "Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History from the Earliest Times to the Reign of Edward the First (Cambridge Library Collection - Medieval History)" By William Stubbs Amazon.co.uk Google Books shows




            The several members are called ... in the Exchequer barones or barones scaccari, a title that belongs to them even after they have ceased to be chosen from the ranks of the great vassals.







            share|improve this answer





























              9














              The short answer is that the members of Court of Exchequer were called Barons because that was members of that court were called.



              The answer is that the titles and court were created in the 1190's when there was no such thing as the House of Lords and titles were not regulated as they were later.
              To show that not all Barons are in the House of Lords. Wikipedia says




              Under King Henry II, the Dialogus de Scaccario already distinguished between greater barons, who held per baroniam by knight's service, and lesser barons, who held manors. Technically, Lords of Manors are barons, or freemen, however they are not entitled to be styled as such. John Selden writes in Titles of Honour, "The word Baro (Latin for Baron) hath been also so much communicated, that not only all Lords of Mannors have been from antient time, and are at this day called sometimes Barons (as in the stile of their Court Barons, which is Curia Baronis, &c. And I have read hors de son Barony in a barr to an Avowry for hors de son fee) But also the Judges of the Exchequer have it from antient time fixed on them."[6]




              The same article continues to say that after Magna Carta the greater barons were summoned to the King's Council which evolved into the House of Lords (and the current definition of Baron) and the
              lesser barons were summoned by choosing members fo a group of them eventually this became House of Commons.



              Thus in Norman era pre 1200 Baron was really just a term for those who had sworn fealty to the king.



              "Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History from the Earliest Times to the Reign of Edward the First (Cambridge Library Collection - Medieval History)" By William Stubbs Amazon.co.uk Google Books shows




              The several members are called ... in the Exchequer barones or barones scaccari, a title that belongs to them even after they have ceased to be chosen from the ranks of the great vassals.







              share|improve this answer



























                9












                9








                9







                The short answer is that the members of Court of Exchequer were called Barons because that was members of that court were called.



                The answer is that the titles and court were created in the 1190's when there was no such thing as the House of Lords and titles were not regulated as they were later.
                To show that not all Barons are in the House of Lords. Wikipedia says




                Under King Henry II, the Dialogus de Scaccario already distinguished between greater barons, who held per baroniam by knight's service, and lesser barons, who held manors. Technically, Lords of Manors are barons, or freemen, however they are not entitled to be styled as such. John Selden writes in Titles of Honour, "The word Baro (Latin for Baron) hath been also so much communicated, that not only all Lords of Mannors have been from antient time, and are at this day called sometimes Barons (as in the stile of their Court Barons, which is Curia Baronis, &c. And I have read hors de son Barony in a barr to an Avowry for hors de son fee) But also the Judges of the Exchequer have it from antient time fixed on them."[6]




                The same article continues to say that after Magna Carta the greater barons were summoned to the King's Council which evolved into the House of Lords (and the current definition of Baron) and the
                lesser barons were summoned by choosing members fo a group of them eventually this became House of Commons.



                Thus in Norman era pre 1200 Baron was really just a term for those who had sworn fealty to the king.



                "Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History from the Earliest Times to the Reign of Edward the First (Cambridge Library Collection - Medieval History)" By William Stubbs Amazon.co.uk Google Books shows




                The several members are called ... in the Exchequer barones or barones scaccari, a title that belongs to them even after they have ceased to be chosen from the ranks of the great vassals.







                share|improve this answer















                The short answer is that the members of Court of Exchequer were called Barons because that was members of that court were called.



                The answer is that the titles and court were created in the 1190's when there was no such thing as the House of Lords and titles were not regulated as they were later.
                To show that not all Barons are in the House of Lords. Wikipedia says




                Under King Henry II, the Dialogus de Scaccario already distinguished between greater barons, who held per baroniam by knight's service, and lesser barons, who held manors. Technically, Lords of Manors are barons, or freemen, however they are not entitled to be styled as such. John Selden writes in Titles of Honour, "The word Baro (Latin for Baron) hath been also so much communicated, that not only all Lords of Mannors have been from antient time, and are at this day called sometimes Barons (as in the stile of their Court Barons, which is Curia Baronis, &c. And I have read hors de son Barony in a barr to an Avowry for hors de son fee) But also the Judges of the Exchequer have it from antient time fixed on them."[6]




                The same article continues to say that after Magna Carta the greater barons were summoned to the King's Council which evolved into the House of Lords (and the current definition of Baron) and the
                lesser barons were summoned by choosing members fo a group of them eventually this became House of Commons.



                Thus in Norman era pre 1200 Baron was really just a term for those who had sworn fealty to the king.



                "Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History from the Earliest Times to the Reign of Edward the First (Cambridge Library Collection - Medieval History)" By William Stubbs Amazon.co.uk Google Books shows




                The several members are called ... in the Exchequer barones or barones scaccari, a title that belongs to them even after they have ceased to be chosen from the ranks of the great vassals.








                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered 2 days ago









                MarkMark

                35149




                35149



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52227%2fwhy-werent-the-barons-of-the-court-of-exchequer-barons-as-peers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                    Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                    Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?