Ttdfjt

According to the code given below and the answer for it:

Question: Which of the following structure declarations will throw an error?

1. struct temp char c; s;
   int main(void) 
   




2. struct temp char c; ;
   struct temp s;
   int main(void) 
   




3. struct temp s; 
   struct temp char c; ;
   int main(void) 
   




4. None of the above.

Answer: 4

Is this correct? Can we declare a structure object first and only then the structure definition?

Yeah, C is weird sometimes. Because that variable is at file scope and has no initializer or storage class specifier, it constitutes a tentative defintion. The C standard defines it as follows:

6.9.2 External object definitions

A declaration of an identifier for an object that has file scope
without an initializer, and without a storage-class specifier or with
the storage-class specifier static, constitutes a tentative
definition. If a translation unit contains one or more tentative
definitions for an identifier, and the translation unit contains no
external definition for that identifier, then the behavior is exactly
as if the translation unit contains a file scope declaration of that
identifier, with the composite type as of the end of the translation
unit, with an initializer equal to 0.

I emphasized the relevant part. Because there is no initializer on your variable, it's as though you'd written it at the very end of the file and initialized to zero. The physical layout of the file is immaterial, because logically, the definition of the structure type is available at the end of the file.

So the answer is indeed (4). I wouldn't write code like that in real life however, this is terribly confusing in the C eco-system where near everything must be pre-declared to be used.