Did each Shuttle have its own dedicated Canadarm?Why was Space Shuttle Atlantis selected for Mir docking so frequently?Did moving a Shuttle Remote Manipulator System (RMS) from one Orbiter to another have any impact on operations?Did the Space Shuttle have “military uses”?If the Space Shuttle missed its landing approach, what could have been done?Was the possibility of damage to the SS Columbia made public before it reentered on Feb 1, 2003?Why did the External Tank not have its own engines?Was the shuttle program a success?Why were four Space Shuttle orbiters initially built?How did the Space Shuttle keep its cryogenic fuel cold?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?What military forces provided Space Shuttle search and rescue?Why would a space shuttle have flown a normal first-stage and early-second-stage ascent trajectory during an RTLS abort?
Is there a way to save this session?
The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public
Get value of the passed argument to script importing variables from another script
Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?
How can Iron Man's suit withstand this?
Can an old DSLR be upgraded to match modern smartphone image quality
Why use water tanks from a retired Space Shuttle?
How to apply the "glow" effect to a rectangle with tcolorbox?
Does Peach's float negate shorthop knockback multipliers?
Concise way to draw this pyramid
What happens if you do emergency landing on a US base in middle of the ocean?
Are there practical reasons to NOT use a stepper motor with lead screw for the X and or Y axes?
What does War Machine's "Canopy! Canopy!" line mean in "Avengers: Endgame"?
Restoring order in a deck of playing cards (II)
How is it possible for this NPC to be alive during the Curse of Strahd adventure?
Initialize an array of doubles at compile time
Incremental Ranges!
Show sparse matrices like chessboards
Anyone teach web development? How do you assess it?
Is it legal in the UK for politicians to lie to the public for political gain?
Is it possible to kill all life on Earth?
PhD student with mental health issues and bad performance
What does it mean by "d-ism of Leibniz" and "dotage of Newton" in simple English?
Unconventional Opposites
Did each Shuttle have its own dedicated Canadarm?
Why was Space Shuttle Atlantis selected for Mir docking so frequently?Did moving a Shuttle Remote Manipulator System (RMS) from one Orbiter to another have any impact on operations?Did the Space Shuttle have “military uses”?If the Space Shuttle missed its landing approach, what could have been done?Was the possibility of damage to the SS Columbia made public before it reentered on Feb 1, 2003?Why did the External Tank not have its own engines?Was the shuttle program a success?Why were four Space Shuttle orbiters initially built?How did the Space Shuttle keep its cryogenic fuel cold?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?What military forces provided Space Shuttle search and rescue?Why would a space shuttle have flown a normal first-stage and early-second-stage ascent trajectory during an RTLS abort?
$begingroup$
Five Canadarm robotic arms were built. Five space shuttle orbiters were flown to space.
Did each orbiter have its own dedicated Canadarm? Or were they rather moved around from orbiter to orbiter, based on whatever equipment was ready at the moment?
space-shuttle canadarm
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Five Canadarm robotic arms were built. Five space shuttle orbiters were flown to space.
Did each orbiter have its own dedicated Canadarm? Or were they rather moved around from orbiter to orbiter, based on whatever equipment was ready at the moment?
space-shuttle canadarm
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Five Canadarm robotic arms were built. Five space shuttle orbiters were flown to space.
Did each orbiter have its own dedicated Canadarm? Or were they rather moved around from orbiter to orbiter, based on whatever equipment was ready at the moment?
space-shuttle canadarm
$endgroup$
Five Canadarm robotic arms were built. Five space shuttle orbiters were flown to space.
Did each orbiter have its own dedicated Canadarm? Or were they rather moved around from orbiter to orbiter, based on whatever equipment was ready at the moment?
space-shuttle canadarm
space-shuttle canadarm
asked May 25 at 0:25
DrSheldonDrSheldon
7,66922973
7,66922973
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, they were not dedicated (except for 302 to Challenger, but that was a fluke, it was not the original arm on that Orbiter).
They swapped 'em around but not at random - if it made sense to leave them on an orbiter, they did.
I won't go through the whole history, but look at some early flights:
- Arm 201 flew on missions 2, 3, 4 (Columbia), then 7, 8, 11
(Challenger).... - Arm 302 flew on missions 41-C, 41-G, 51-F, 61-A, then was lost on
51-L (Challenger) (so it only flew on Challenger) - Arm 301 flew on 41-D, 51-A, 51-C, 51-D, 51-G, 51-I, 31, 41, 39, 48 (Discovery), 52 (Columbia), 56 (Discovery)....
- Arm 303 flew on 61-B (Atlantis), 49 (Endeavour)....
- Arm 202 flew on 66 (Atlantis) and 80 (Columbia)....
Space Shuttle Missions Summary
Orbiter scheduling was complicated and they wouldn't leave an arm sitting in Palmdale while the Orbiter was down for extensive maintenance. Some of the complications of scheduling are discussed in the answer to this question: Why was Space Shuttle Atlantis selected for Mir docking so frequently? (You can see RMS annotations in the charts in that answer as well - in the second chart you can see Discovery fly with 301, 201, 201, 303, 301 - excerpt below, purple arrows).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36376%2fdid-each-shuttle-have-its-own-dedicated-canadarm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, they were not dedicated (except for 302 to Challenger, but that was a fluke, it was not the original arm on that Orbiter).
They swapped 'em around but not at random - if it made sense to leave them on an orbiter, they did.
I won't go through the whole history, but look at some early flights:
- Arm 201 flew on missions 2, 3, 4 (Columbia), then 7, 8, 11
(Challenger).... - Arm 302 flew on missions 41-C, 41-G, 51-F, 61-A, then was lost on
51-L (Challenger) (so it only flew on Challenger) - Arm 301 flew on 41-D, 51-A, 51-C, 51-D, 51-G, 51-I, 31, 41, 39, 48 (Discovery), 52 (Columbia), 56 (Discovery)....
- Arm 303 flew on 61-B (Atlantis), 49 (Endeavour)....
- Arm 202 flew on 66 (Atlantis) and 80 (Columbia)....
Space Shuttle Missions Summary
Orbiter scheduling was complicated and they wouldn't leave an arm sitting in Palmdale while the Orbiter was down for extensive maintenance. Some of the complications of scheduling are discussed in the answer to this question: Why was Space Shuttle Atlantis selected for Mir docking so frequently? (You can see RMS annotations in the charts in that answer as well - in the second chart you can see Discovery fly with 301, 201, 201, 303, 301 - excerpt below, purple arrows).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, they were not dedicated (except for 302 to Challenger, but that was a fluke, it was not the original arm on that Orbiter).
They swapped 'em around but not at random - if it made sense to leave them on an orbiter, they did.
I won't go through the whole history, but look at some early flights:
- Arm 201 flew on missions 2, 3, 4 (Columbia), then 7, 8, 11
(Challenger).... - Arm 302 flew on missions 41-C, 41-G, 51-F, 61-A, then was lost on
51-L (Challenger) (so it only flew on Challenger) - Arm 301 flew on 41-D, 51-A, 51-C, 51-D, 51-G, 51-I, 31, 41, 39, 48 (Discovery), 52 (Columbia), 56 (Discovery)....
- Arm 303 flew on 61-B (Atlantis), 49 (Endeavour)....
- Arm 202 flew on 66 (Atlantis) and 80 (Columbia)....
Space Shuttle Missions Summary
Orbiter scheduling was complicated and they wouldn't leave an arm sitting in Palmdale while the Orbiter was down for extensive maintenance. Some of the complications of scheduling are discussed in the answer to this question: Why was Space Shuttle Atlantis selected for Mir docking so frequently? (You can see RMS annotations in the charts in that answer as well - in the second chart you can see Discovery fly with 301, 201, 201, 303, 301 - excerpt below, purple arrows).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, they were not dedicated (except for 302 to Challenger, but that was a fluke, it was not the original arm on that Orbiter).
They swapped 'em around but not at random - if it made sense to leave them on an orbiter, they did.
I won't go through the whole history, but look at some early flights:
- Arm 201 flew on missions 2, 3, 4 (Columbia), then 7, 8, 11
(Challenger).... - Arm 302 flew on missions 41-C, 41-G, 51-F, 61-A, then was lost on
51-L (Challenger) (so it only flew on Challenger) - Arm 301 flew on 41-D, 51-A, 51-C, 51-D, 51-G, 51-I, 31, 41, 39, 48 (Discovery), 52 (Columbia), 56 (Discovery)....
- Arm 303 flew on 61-B (Atlantis), 49 (Endeavour)....
- Arm 202 flew on 66 (Atlantis) and 80 (Columbia)....
Space Shuttle Missions Summary
Orbiter scheduling was complicated and they wouldn't leave an arm sitting in Palmdale while the Orbiter was down for extensive maintenance. Some of the complications of scheduling are discussed in the answer to this question: Why was Space Shuttle Atlantis selected for Mir docking so frequently? (You can see RMS annotations in the charts in that answer as well - in the second chart you can see Discovery fly with 301, 201, 201, 303, 301 - excerpt below, purple arrows).
$endgroup$
No, they were not dedicated (except for 302 to Challenger, but that was a fluke, it was not the original arm on that Orbiter).
They swapped 'em around but not at random - if it made sense to leave them on an orbiter, they did.
I won't go through the whole history, but look at some early flights:
- Arm 201 flew on missions 2, 3, 4 (Columbia), then 7, 8, 11
(Challenger).... - Arm 302 flew on missions 41-C, 41-G, 51-F, 61-A, then was lost on
51-L (Challenger) (so it only flew on Challenger) - Arm 301 flew on 41-D, 51-A, 51-C, 51-D, 51-G, 51-I, 31, 41, 39, 48 (Discovery), 52 (Columbia), 56 (Discovery)....
- Arm 303 flew on 61-B (Atlantis), 49 (Endeavour)....
- Arm 202 flew on 66 (Atlantis) and 80 (Columbia)....
Space Shuttle Missions Summary
Orbiter scheduling was complicated and they wouldn't leave an arm sitting in Palmdale while the Orbiter was down for extensive maintenance. Some of the complications of scheduling are discussed in the answer to this question: Why was Space Shuttle Atlantis selected for Mir docking so frequently? (You can see RMS annotations in the charts in that answer as well - in the second chart you can see Discovery fly with 301, 201, 201, 303, 301 - excerpt below, purple arrows).
edited May 25 at 2:06
answered May 25 at 1:11
Organic MarbleOrganic Marble
64.5k4180273
64.5k4180273
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36376%2fdid-each-shuttle-have-its-own-dedicated-canadarm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown