Installed Electric Tankless Water Heater - Internet loss when activeIs there an electric tankless water heater that takes multiple electric lines as input?ADSL + Ethernet Surge Protection. What is chaining?Tankless water heater - Electric issueTankless water heater requirementsIs there an electric tankless water heater that takes multiple electric lines as input?How crucial is a filter for your tankless water heater?Replacing electric tankless water heaterTankless water heater ventingTankless Water Heater - wasting waterCan my home's power supply handle this tankless water heater?Tankless water heater and shutting off main water supply
Does Peach's float negate shorthop knockback multipliers?
Can an old DSLR be upgraded to match modern smartphone image quality
Metal bar on DMM PCB
Do adult Russians normally hand-write Cyrillic as cursive or as block letters?
Setting extra bits in a bool makes it true and false at the same time
What does War Machine's "Canopy! Canopy!" line mean in "Avengers: Endgame"?
Hygienic footwear for prehensile feet?
Is it a problem that pull requests are approved without any comments
Is it possible for people to live in the eye of a permanent hypercane?
Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?
What is the Process for Re-certifying Flight Hardware?
Opposite of "Squeaky wheel gets the grease"
How can I add depth to my story or how do I determine if my story already has depth?
Humans meet a distant alien species. How do they standardize? - Units of Measure
How to decline physical affection from a child whose parents are pressuring them?
What happens if you do emergency landing on a US base in middle of the ocean?
How can I make 20-200 ohm variable resistor look like a 20-240 ohm resistor?
The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public
Please help me identify this plane
What is the right way to float a home lab?
Explain Ant-Man's "not it" scene from Avengers: Endgame
Why were the Night's Watch required to be celibate?
Did thousands of women die every year due to illegal abortions before Roe v. Wade?
NTP rollover-safe design with ESP8266 (Curiosity)
Installed Electric Tankless Water Heater - Internet loss when active
Is there an electric tankless water heater that takes multiple electric lines as input?ADSL + Ethernet Surge Protection. What is chaining?Tankless water heater - Electric issueTankless water heater requirementsIs there an electric tankless water heater that takes multiple electric lines as input?How crucial is a filter for your tankless water heater?Replacing electric tankless water heaterTankless water heater ventingTankless Water Heater - wasting waterCan my home's power supply handle this tankless water heater?Tankless water heater and shutting off main water supply
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I installed an Ecosmart 27kw tankless water heater yesterday and as far as heating the water goes, everything works perfectly.
The issue is when the water heater is running, I lose internet!
Specs:
- Heater is 240v 27kw @ draw 112.5amps
- Breakers are 3x 40amp dual pole across both sides of the split phase
- Wiring is 3x 8awg
- My internet is 10mbit ADSL down the phone line.
--
My suspicion is that the high amp lines are creating an electrical field which is interfering with the low voltage phone line system, killing my internet.
When turning on the hot water, I loose access to ping google.com, however I can still ping 192.168.2.1 [my router] which says it's not the router that's being interfered with via power loss.
Any recommendations regarding minimum distance between the high amp cables and the phone line. Am I even on the right track here?
Thanks - Jon
Update: Fixed by installing a new phone line externally, 2 meters away from the high amp lines with cat7 cable.
electrical tankless phone-wiring internet
New contributor
|
show 10 more comments
I installed an Ecosmart 27kw tankless water heater yesterday and as far as heating the water goes, everything works perfectly.
The issue is when the water heater is running, I lose internet!
Specs:
- Heater is 240v 27kw @ draw 112.5amps
- Breakers are 3x 40amp dual pole across both sides of the split phase
- Wiring is 3x 8awg
- My internet is 10mbit ADSL down the phone line.
--
My suspicion is that the high amp lines are creating an electrical field which is interfering with the low voltage phone line system, killing my internet.
When turning on the hot water, I loose access to ping google.com, however I can still ping 192.168.2.1 [my router] which says it's not the router that's being interfered with via power loss.
Any recommendations regarding minimum distance between the high amp cables and the phone line. Am I even on the right track here?
Thanks - Jon
Update: Fixed by installing a new phone line externally, 2 meters away from the high amp lines with cat7 cable.
electrical tankless phone-wiring internet
New contributor
1
Probably accurate - dslreports.com/faq/8511
– TEEKAY
May 24 at 13:58
1
Where does the phone line run in relation to the supply for the water heater? Is your phone system properly bonded to your electrical grounding system? Are all connections tight, screw terminals etc? You could try powering the DSL modem off a battery or UPS temporarily to see if that relieves the issue.
– PhilippNagel
May 24 at 14:00
1
Must be because the internet is a bunch of tubes :-)
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 14:13
1
@manassehkatz I guess i plumbed it in wrong, should have attached the cold source to the phone line :)
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 14:13
2
The video is correct. Was this followed correctly in your installation? Reason I'm asking is that exchanging two reds for instance, the heater will function normally, but will throw a huge 60Hz magnetic field between the cables. A simple way of testing this is to put a clamp ammeter around each cable one at a time. Anytime you clamp a whole cable, it should read near zero because currents should cancel each other out.
– Harper
May 24 at 15:57
|
show 10 more comments
I installed an Ecosmart 27kw tankless water heater yesterday and as far as heating the water goes, everything works perfectly.
The issue is when the water heater is running, I lose internet!
Specs:
- Heater is 240v 27kw @ draw 112.5amps
- Breakers are 3x 40amp dual pole across both sides of the split phase
- Wiring is 3x 8awg
- My internet is 10mbit ADSL down the phone line.
--
My suspicion is that the high amp lines are creating an electrical field which is interfering with the low voltage phone line system, killing my internet.
When turning on the hot water, I loose access to ping google.com, however I can still ping 192.168.2.1 [my router] which says it's not the router that's being interfered with via power loss.
Any recommendations regarding minimum distance between the high amp cables and the phone line. Am I even on the right track here?
Thanks - Jon
Update: Fixed by installing a new phone line externally, 2 meters away from the high amp lines with cat7 cable.
electrical tankless phone-wiring internet
New contributor
I installed an Ecosmart 27kw tankless water heater yesterday and as far as heating the water goes, everything works perfectly.
The issue is when the water heater is running, I lose internet!
Specs:
- Heater is 240v 27kw @ draw 112.5amps
- Breakers are 3x 40amp dual pole across both sides of the split phase
- Wiring is 3x 8awg
- My internet is 10mbit ADSL down the phone line.
--
My suspicion is that the high amp lines are creating an electrical field which is interfering with the low voltage phone line system, killing my internet.
When turning on the hot water, I loose access to ping google.com, however I can still ping 192.168.2.1 [my router] which says it's not the router that's being interfered with via power loss.
Any recommendations regarding minimum distance between the high amp cables and the phone line. Am I even on the right track here?
Thanks - Jon
Update: Fixed by installing a new phone line externally, 2 meters away from the high amp lines with cat7 cable.
electrical tankless phone-wiring internet
electrical tankless phone-wiring internet
New contributor
New contributor
edited May 27 at 12:25
Jon Barker
New contributor
asked May 24 at 13:49
Jon BarkerJon Barker
1838
1838
New contributor
New contributor
1
Probably accurate - dslreports.com/faq/8511
– TEEKAY
May 24 at 13:58
1
Where does the phone line run in relation to the supply for the water heater? Is your phone system properly bonded to your electrical grounding system? Are all connections tight, screw terminals etc? You could try powering the DSL modem off a battery or UPS temporarily to see if that relieves the issue.
– PhilippNagel
May 24 at 14:00
1
Must be because the internet is a bunch of tubes :-)
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 14:13
1
@manassehkatz I guess i plumbed it in wrong, should have attached the cold source to the phone line :)
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 14:13
2
The video is correct. Was this followed correctly in your installation? Reason I'm asking is that exchanging two reds for instance, the heater will function normally, but will throw a huge 60Hz magnetic field between the cables. A simple way of testing this is to put a clamp ammeter around each cable one at a time. Anytime you clamp a whole cable, it should read near zero because currents should cancel each other out.
– Harper
May 24 at 15:57
|
show 10 more comments
1
Probably accurate - dslreports.com/faq/8511
– TEEKAY
May 24 at 13:58
1
Where does the phone line run in relation to the supply for the water heater? Is your phone system properly bonded to your electrical grounding system? Are all connections tight, screw terminals etc? You could try powering the DSL modem off a battery or UPS temporarily to see if that relieves the issue.
– PhilippNagel
May 24 at 14:00
1
Must be because the internet is a bunch of tubes :-)
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 14:13
1
@manassehkatz I guess i plumbed it in wrong, should have attached the cold source to the phone line :)
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 14:13
2
The video is correct. Was this followed correctly in your installation? Reason I'm asking is that exchanging two reds for instance, the heater will function normally, but will throw a huge 60Hz magnetic field between the cables. A simple way of testing this is to put a clamp ammeter around each cable one at a time. Anytime you clamp a whole cable, it should read near zero because currents should cancel each other out.
– Harper
May 24 at 15:57
1
1
Probably accurate - dslreports.com/faq/8511
– TEEKAY
May 24 at 13:58
Probably accurate - dslreports.com/faq/8511
– TEEKAY
May 24 at 13:58
1
1
Where does the phone line run in relation to the supply for the water heater? Is your phone system properly bonded to your electrical grounding system? Are all connections tight, screw terminals etc? You could try powering the DSL modem off a battery or UPS temporarily to see if that relieves the issue.
– PhilippNagel
May 24 at 14:00
Where does the phone line run in relation to the supply for the water heater? Is your phone system properly bonded to your electrical grounding system? Are all connections tight, screw terminals etc? You could try powering the DSL modem off a battery or UPS temporarily to see if that relieves the issue.
– PhilippNagel
May 24 at 14:00
1
1
Must be because the internet is a bunch of tubes :-)
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 14:13
Must be because the internet is a bunch of tubes :-)
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 14:13
1
1
@manassehkatz I guess i plumbed it in wrong, should have attached the cold source to the phone line :)
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 14:13
@manassehkatz I guess i plumbed it in wrong, should have attached the cold source to the phone line :)
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 14:13
2
2
The video is correct. Was this followed correctly in your installation? Reason I'm asking is that exchanging two reds for instance, the heater will function normally, but will throw a huge 60Hz magnetic field between the cables. A simple way of testing this is to put a clamp ammeter around each cable one at a time. Anytime you clamp a whole cable, it should read near zero because currents should cancel each other out.
– Harper
May 24 at 15:57
The video is correct. Was this followed correctly in your installation? Reason I'm asking is that exchanging two reds for instance, the heater will function normally, but will throw a huge 60Hz magnetic field between the cables. A simple way of testing this is to put a clamp ammeter around each cable one at a time. Anytime you clamp a whole cable, it should read near zero because currents should cancel each other out.
– Harper
May 24 at 15:57
|
show 10 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Something you might want to consider here is that your phone line inside the house is probably something crappy and unshielded. Cat3, for instance, offers virtually no shielding at all. What I would suggest is upgrading your phone line from the box to your modem with something that is better shielded, like Cat6. If you can afford it, going even higher (Cat6a or 7) would afford you greater shielding. 10MB down a copper line is probably highly susceptible to even minor interference.
2
It could be far worse. Plenty of houses, particularly if built earlier than the 1980s, have an incoming phone cable that isn't even up to Cat 3 standards.
– manassehkatz
May 26 at 2:57
2
I'll accept this as the answer as it was the closest one to solve my problem - I noticed that my phone line was running parallel to the high amp cables. I moved the phoneline outside the house along the eternal wall about 2 meters below where the high amp cables were. I used cat 7 shielded cable and ran it to the router away from the high amp lines. This solved the problem. Now my internet works normally when the hot water is on!
– Jon Barker
May 27 at 12:22
add a comment |
First, make sure that your three supply cables are paired properly. The unit has 3 heaters internally. There are several ways cables could be crossed that would result in power from 1 heater coming up one cable and returning on another cable. The heater would work properly, but would kick stupid large amounts of EMF from the two imbalanced cables. Just double-check it.
Or, the heater may be throwing high frequency electromagnetic hash, with the cable(s) becoming antennas and making this worse. Now, electric resistive heating elements, alone, do not throw electromagnetic hash. That would only happen from
- a) control electronics, which will surely only be on one cable/circuit; or
- b) power choppers ("dimmers") which could be on 1 or all of the circuits, but there'd be no useful reason to have them on more than 1 circuit.
Also, there's a thing I don't like about how Ecosmarts are installed - they expect you to cram three #8 cables through one 1" hole, which is a lot to ask, and requires just the right cable clamps to not violate Code.
I would install a 6" square deep or larger metal box right below the EcoSmart and a short EMT conduit nipple connecting it to the EcoSmart's wiring hole. Bring the 3 cables into the large box with correct clamps; leaving space for up to 3 "surge suppressors" to be fit onto 3 knockouts.
Then I would consult with EcoSmart and ask them a) which circuit powers the control electronics and b) whether they merely switch all 3 heaters, or whether they use power choppers, and if they do, on which circuit(s).
On the circuits which do not use choppers or electronics, those can be wired straight through the 6" box, up the conduit nipple and to the terminals.
For the circuit(s) which do use choppers or electronics, you run a pigtail from the EcoSmart's terminal into this box. Then you mount a "surge suppressor" in one of the knockouts (or not, if it's a type that can live inside the junction box e.g. Meanwell SPD-20-277P). Then join those wires to the power line from the panel. This wires the Ecosmart and the suppressor in parallel (the usual way you "tee" a connection) - it's not wired in series like a switch.
At this point, the surge suppressor(s) should be damping out the EM interference before it leaves the metal faraday cage of the Ecosmart + junction box.
I suppose Ecosmart could build this into the product, but that would raise the price-point, and so you might not have selected the product.
Thanks for this input. I'm 99% sure the cables are paired correctly as they are all color coded red/black and grouped by breaker by the panel, and grouped by input on the heater. Regarding imbalanced cables: So if a line and load aren't grouped on the same cable then the load produces an EMF because it doesn't have the line to cancel it out? Good to know.
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:13
@JonBarker Current flows in loops. It flows up wire 1 and returns on wire 2. (or sometimes is split, returning on wires 2 and 3). Each direction kicks up rather large EMF in proportion to current. If the wires are tightly bound together (i.e. in a cable), the large EMFs are equal and opposite - and cancel each other out. Hence no reading on a clamp ammeter.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:22
1
Note that an Arlington NM843 connector can fit 3 8/2s into a 1" KO (in fact, it can fit an 8/3 and 2 6/2s)
– ThreePhaseEel
May 24 at 23:09
@ThreePhaseEel thanks. I hope EcoSmart includes one, if people were left on their own to find it, I'd expect most DIYers and many electricians to use the wrong thing.
– Harper
May 25 at 4:49
add a comment |
Long shot...if I'm wrong I'll delete.
112 Amps is a HUGE draw. As you probably know, many houses have a total 100 Amp (sometimes less) service. If your service drop isn't significantly larger, or even if it is but the utility didn't provision it well (e.g., they can, as I understand from other questions regarding service-entrance vs. "other" cables for 100A and similar sizes, downsize a good bit based on normal expected usage), then you could have a significant dip every time the heater kicks in. While the DSL modem is likely designed to handle a range of voltages, that still might be enough to cause problems. Similar to the way a laser printer on a 15A circuit can cause enough of a dip to reset some devices or at least to lower voltage enough for a few seconds that a UPS will treat it as an outage.
The right way to test this would be to monitor the voltage on the line powering the DSL modem as the heater starts up. If your voltages drops from 115V to 95V (or something like that) then the modem may simply not handle the low voltage and/or the voltage change well and lose the signal.
The secondary ways to test this are:
- See if lights (especially incandescent as LED will often handle voltage fluctuations just fine) dim when the heater starts up.
- Plug the modem (and while you're at it, the router and any other nearby computer-related devices, except laser printers) into a UPS. I use APC, but any decent model will do fine and I think it is a great investment - one didn't-reboot-during-a-thunderstorm can make it worth it even if it doesn't help for this problem. If the internet stays "live" with the modem & router on a UPS then you have your answer - and your fix.
1
A good possibility. These are resistive elements, so they should not have any startup surge at all. Voltage drop will be exactly the same throughout heater operation as during heater start (unless the heater "throttles up and down" by cutting out elements, in which case my query about cable matching becomes relevant.)
– Harper
May 24 at 16:58
Thanks for the input here - doesn't apply for me, but may be useful for others so won't downvote. My incoming current is 200amp on the main panel breaker, and the DSL modem/router is already on a UPS which will be maintaining a steady 120v
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:02
Aha! The UPS is the key - the utility could say 200A and still there could be issues if it was marginal in some way. But the UPS rules out my theory, at least in your case.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 18:16
3
oh, yes, this. Just because they provision 200A service does not mean they're not using the same #6Al service drop from when they provisioned 60A. Difference being, now they have a smart meter, which will notify them "Hey, I just saw a 19 volt voltage drop" or "hey, this guy is actually drawing 110 amps" (which they then run against their database showing a #6Al drop). In theory, after the system has collected enough data, it'll open a ticket to change your service drop to something appropriate, without you lifting a finger.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:28
1
@JonBarker Try plugging the modem straight into the wall and switching the UPS off completely. It's possible that when the input voltage sags as you turn on the heater, the UPS kicks in and starts boosting the voltage to 120 V, creating a lot of interference in the process.
– TooTea
May 25 at 13:21
add a comment |
Find out what the DSL modem sees.
DSL is designed to detect and avoid all kinds of interference entering the line. Technically, it splits up the whole band into many narrow channels, continuously monitors them for noise and only uses the noise-free ones to transmit data. Any interference should thus just make the line slower but not kill it completely. Also, the low-frequency end of the spectrum is often reserved for voice and completely ignored by DSL, so the 60 Hz current into the heater might not matter at all.
Instead of playing around with the heater to try to figure out what's going wrong, check out the diagnostics on the DSL modem. When you log into its web management interface (by entering its IP address into your address bar and logging in, possibly with default passwords that should be either in the manual or on a label on the unit), you should be able to find some "DSL Status" tab showing what's actually going on with the line.
There will be something like Line State
saying up
, showtime
, synchronized
or so. Does that change when you flip the breaker?
If it doesn't, look for something like Noise Margin
. That will probably change a lot if the line starts picking up a new source of interference. That in turn leads to Attainable Data Rate
dropping as the modem stops using the noisiest channels.
There will also be something like Line Attenuation
and Signal Attenuation
. This probably won't change as it measures how much signal is lost along the way to the DSLAM.
That's a good way to confirm the times, and that something is messing up the DSL signal. If the modem doesn't have such logging, then the ISP may be able to organise a line test across a certain time window. Downside, it doesn't show why the water heater is causing the interference, just that the timing lines up and confirms the heater switching as the cause.
– Criggie
May 25 at 21:41
add a comment |
112A will induce voltages in any cables (phone connections) anywhere near that massive power-line you have.
What is meant by the term "split-phase" - is this single phase or guessing by the use of "3x 40amp dual pole breakers" a system where a 3 phase supply is split into 3 single phases?
If so, I strongly doubt it meets current electrical regulations...
2
"Split phase" is the normal North American system of 240V --> 2 x 120V. 3 x 40A is really to get 120A total, but is done as 3 x 40A because that makes the wiring & breakers a whole lot easier. Each of those 40A is 240V == hot/hot/ground. Just think of it as 3 dryer or oven or conventional water heater circuits, but all feeding into one on-demand heater.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:23
1
Yuck! - do they really allow that!!!
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:24
3
It's the latest thing. I have my own reasons why I wouldn't do that, and it makes a lot more sense to me if done with natural gas (though arguably if you can get "green" power then electric is better for the environment). I think the concept is: why heat up 50 gallons and let it sit if you only need hot water once in a while.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:25
2
@JeremyBoden Of course they do. They're not paralleling; the unit has 3 heaters each <40A fully isolated from each other. Nothing wrong with that! A very sensible way to get that much power. Multiple smallish cables is better than 1 big one (ask if you want to know why). Also, this allows use on 3-phase - 240V "delta" (US), 208 "wye" (US) or 220V "wye" (Brazil) both delta-connected, or 400V "wye" (Europe). Or even 480V "wye" US with bucking transformers or different heating elements. At that point you are wiring the appliance with 3-4 wires.
– Harper
May 24 at 17:36
1
I'd argue that multiple circuit breakers for one device is rather peculiar. Can't see that multiple heaters on dedicated wiring is better than one heater on one connection.
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "73"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Jon Barker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f165793%2finstalled-electric-tankless-water-heater-internet-loss-when-active%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Something you might want to consider here is that your phone line inside the house is probably something crappy and unshielded. Cat3, for instance, offers virtually no shielding at all. What I would suggest is upgrading your phone line from the box to your modem with something that is better shielded, like Cat6. If you can afford it, going even higher (Cat6a or 7) would afford you greater shielding. 10MB down a copper line is probably highly susceptible to even minor interference.
2
It could be far worse. Plenty of houses, particularly if built earlier than the 1980s, have an incoming phone cable that isn't even up to Cat 3 standards.
– manassehkatz
May 26 at 2:57
2
I'll accept this as the answer as it was the closest one to solve my problem - I noticed that my phone line was running parallel to the high amp cables. I moved the phoneline outside the house along the eternal wall about 2 meters below where the high amp cables were. I used cat 7 shielded cable and ran it to the router away from the high amp lines. This solved the problem. Now my internet works normally when the hot water is on!
– Jon Barker
May 27 at 12:22
add a comment |
Something you might want to consider here is that your phone line inside the house is probably something crappy and unshielded. Cat3, for instance, offers virtually no shielding at all. What I would suggest is upgrading your phone line from the box to your modem with something that is better shielded, like Cat6. If you can afford it, going even higher (Cat6a or 7) would afford you greater shielding. 10MB down a copper line is probably highly susceptible to even minor interference.
2
It could be far worse. Plenty of houses, particularly if built earlier than the 1980s, have an incoming phone cable that isn't even up to Cat 3 standards.
– manassehkatz
May 26 at 2:57
2
I'll accept this as the answer as it was the closest one to solve my problem - I noticed that my phone line was running parallel to the high amp cables. I moved the phoneline outside the house along the eternal wall about 2 meters below where the high amp cables were. I used cat 7 shielded cable and ran it to the router away from the high amp lines. This solved the problem. Now my internet works normally when the hot water is on!
– Jon Barker
May 27 at 12:22
add a comment |
Something you might want to consider here is that your phone line inside the house is probably something crappy and unshielded. Cat3, for instance, offers virtually no shielding at all. What I would suggest is upgrading your phone line from the box to your modem with something that is better shielded, like Cat6. If you can afford it, going even higher (Cat6a or 7) would afford you greater shielding. 10MB down a copper line is probably highly susceptible to even minor interference.
Something you might want to consider here is that your phone line inside the house is probably something crappy and unshielded. Cat3, for instance, offers virtually no shielding at all. What I would suggest is upgrading your phone line from the box to your modem with something that is better shielded, like Cat6. If you can afford it, going even higher (Cat6a or 7) would afford you greater shielding. 10MB down a copper line is probably highly susceptible to even minor interference.
answered May 25 at 1:51
MachavityMachavity
9,01422043
9,01422043
2
It could be far worse. Plenty of houses, particularly if built earlier than the 1980s, have an incoming phone cable that isn't even up to Cat 3 standards.
– manassehkatz
May 26 at 2:57
2
I'll accept this as the answer as it was the closest one to solve my problem - I noticed that my phone line was running parallel to the high amp cables. I moved the phoneline outside the house along the eternal wall about 2 meters below where the high amp cables were. I used cat 7 shielded cable and ran it to the router away from the high amp lines. This solved the problem. Now my internet works normally when the hot water is on!
– Jon Barker
May 27 at 12:22
add a comment |
2
It could be far worse. Plenty of houses, particularly if built earlier than the 1980s, have an incoming phone cable that isn't even up to Cat 3 standards.
– manassehkatz
May 26 at 2:57
2
I'll accept this as the answer as it was the closest one to solve my problem - I noticed that my phone line was running parallel to the high amp cables. I moved the phoneline outside the house along the eternal wall about 2 meters below where the high amp cables were. I used cat 7 shielded cable and ran it to the router away from the high amp lines. This solved the problem. Now my internet works normally when the hot water is on!
– Jon Barker
May 27 at 12:22
2
2
It could be far worse. Plenty of houses, particularly if built earlier than the 1980s, have an incoming phone cable that isn't even up to Cat 3 standards.
– manassehkatz
May 26 at 2:57
It could be far worse. Plenty of houses, particularly if built earlier than the 1980s, have an incoming phone cable that isn't even up to Cat 3 standards.
– manassehkatz
May 26 at 2:57
2
2
I'll accept this as the answer as it was the closest one to solve my problem - I noticed that my phone line was running parallel to the high amp cables. I moved the phoneline outside the house along the eternal wall about 2 meters below where the high amp cables were. I used cat 7 shielded cable and ran it to the router away from the high amp lines. This solved the problem. Now my internet works normally when the hot water is on!
– Jon Barker
May 27 at 12:22
I'll accept this as the answer as it was the closest one to solve my problem - I noticed that my phone line was running parallel to the high amp cables. I moved the phoneline outside the house along the eternal wall about 2 meters below where the high amp cables were. I used cat 7 shielded cable and ran it to the router away from the high amp lines. This solved the problem. Now my internet works normally when the hot water is on!
– Jon Barker
May 27 at 12:22
add a comment |
First, make sure that your three supply cables are paired properly. The unit has 3 heaters internally. There are several ways cables could be crossed that would result in power from 1 heater coming up one cable and returning on another cable. The heater would work properly, but would kick stupid large amounts of EMF from the two imbalanced cables. Just double-check it.
Or, the heater may be throwing high frequency electromagnetic hash, with the cable(s) becoming antennas and making this worse. Now, electric resistive heating elements, alone, do not throw electromagnetic hash. That would only happen from
- a) control electronics, which will surely only be on one cable/circuit; or
- b) power choppers ("dimmers") which could be on 1 or all of the circuits, but there'd be no useful reason to have them on more than 1 circuit.
Also, there's a thing I don't like about how Ecosmarts are installed - they expect you to cram three #8 cables through one 1" hole, which is a lot to ask, and requires just the right cable clamps to not violate Code.
I would install a 6" square deep or larger metal box right below the EcoSmart and a short EMT conduit nipple connecting it to the EcoSmart's wiring hole. Bring the 3 cables into the large box with correct clamps; leaving space for up to 3 "surge suppressors" to be fit onto 3 knockouts.
Then I would consult with EcoSmart and ask them a) which circuit powers the control electronics and b) whether they merely switch all 3 heaters, or whether they use power choppers, and if they do, on which circuit(s).
On the circuits which do not use choppers or electronics, those can be wired straight through the 6" box, up the conduit nipple and to the terminals.
For the circuit(s) which do use choppers or electronics, you run a pigtail from the EcoSmart's terminal into this box. Then you mount a "surge suppressor" in one of the knockouts (or not, if it's a type that can live inside the junction box e.g. Meanwell SPD-20-277P). Then join those wires to the power line from the panel. This wires the Ecosmart and the suppressor in parallel (the usual way you "tee" a connection) - it's not wired in series like a switch.
At this point, the surge suppressor(s) should be damping out the EM interference before it leaves the metal faraday cage of the Ecosmart + junction box.
I suppose Ecosmart could build this into the product, but that would raise the price-point, and so you might not have selected the product.
Thanks for this input. I'm 99% sure the cables are paired correctly as they are all color coded red/black and grouped by breaker by the panel, and grouped by input on the heater. Regarding imbalanced cables: So if a line and load aren't grouped on the same cable then the load produces an EMF because it doesn't have the line to cancel it out? Good to know.
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:13
@JonBarker Current flows in loops. It flows up wire 1 and returns on wire 2. (or sometimes is split, returning on wires 2 and 3). Each direction kicks up rather large EMF in proportion to current. If the wires are tightly bound together (i.e. in a cable), the large EMFs are equal and opposite - and cancel each other out. Hence no reading on a clamp ammeter.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:22
1
Note that an Arlington NM843 connector can fit 3 8/2s into a 1" KO (in fact, it can fit an 8/3 and 2 6/2s)
– ThreePhaseEel
May 24 at 23:09
@ThreePhaseEel thanks. I hope EcoSmart includes one, if people were left on their own to find it, I'd expect most DIYers and many electricians to use the wrong thing.
– Harper
May 25 at 4:49
add a comment |
First, make sure that your three supply cables are paired properly. The unit has 3 heaters internally. There are several ways cables could be crossed that would result in power from 1 heater coming up one cable and returning on another cable. The heater would work properly, but would kick stupid large amounts of EMF from the two imbalanced cables. Just double-check it.
Or, the heater may be throwing high frequency electromagnetic hash, with the cable(s) becoming antennas and making this worse. Now, electric resistive heating elements, alone, do not throw electromagnetic hash. That would only happen from
- a) control electronics, which will surely only be on one cable/circuit; or
- b) power choppers ("dimmers") which could be on 1 or all of the circuits, but there'd be no useful reason to have them on more than 1 circuit.
Also, there's a thing I don't like about how Ecosmarts are installed - they expect you to cram three #8 cables through one 1" hole, which is a lot to ask, and requires just the right cable clamps to not violate Code.
I would install a 6" square deep or larger metal box right below the EcoSmart and a short EMT conduit nipple connecting it to the EcoSmart's wiring hole. Bring the 3 cables into the large box with correct clamps; leaving space for up to 3 "surge suppressors" to be fit onto 3 knockouts.
Then I would consult with EcoSmart and ask them a) which circuit powers the control electronics and b) whether they merely switch all 3 heaters, or whether they use power choppers, and if they do, on which circuit(s).
On the circuits which do not use choppers or electronics, those can be wired straight through the 6" box, up the conduit nipple and to the terminals.
For the circuit(s) which do use choppers or electronics, you run a pigtail from the EcoSmart's terminal into this box. Then you mount a "surge suppressor" in one of the knockouts (or not, if it's a type that can live inside the junction box e.g. Meanwell SPD-20-277P). Then join those wires to the power line from the panel. This wires the Ecosmart and the suppressor in parallel (the usual way you "tee" a connection) - it's not wired in series like a switch.
At this point, the surge suppressor(s) should be damping out the EM interference before it leaves the metal faraday cage of the Ecosmart + junction box.
I suppose Ecosmart could build this into the product, but that would raise the price-point, and so you might not have selected the product.
Thanks for this input. I'm 99% sure the cables are paired correctly as they are all color coded red/black and grouped by breaker by the panel, and grouped by input on the heater. Regarding imbalanced cables: So if a line and load aren't grouped on the same cable then the load produces an EMF because it doesn't have the line to cancel it out? Good to know.
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:13
@JonBarker Current flows in loops. It flows up wire 1 and returns on wire 2. (or sometimes is split, returning on wires 2 and 3). Each direction kicks up rather large EMF in proportion to current. If the wires are tightly bound together (i.e. in a cable), the large EMFs are equal and opposite - and cancel each other out. Hence no reading on a clamp ammeter.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:22
1
Note that an Arlington NM843 connector can fit 3 8/2s into a 1" KO (in fact, it can fit an 8/3 and 2 6/2s)
– ThreePhaseEel
May 24 at 23:09
@ThreePhaseEel thanks. I hope EcoSmart includes one, if people were left on their own to find it, I'd expect most DIYers and many electricians to use the wrong thing.
– Harper
May 25 at 4:49
add a comment |
First, make sure that your three supply cables are paired properly. The unit has 3 heaters internally. There are several ways cables could be crossed that would result in power from 1 heater coming up one cable and returning on another cable. The heater would work properly, but would kick stupid large amounts of EMF from the two imbalanced cables. Just double-check it.
Or, the heater may be throwing high frequency electromagnetic hash, with the cable(s) becoming antennas and making this worse. Now, electric resistive heating elements, alone, do not throw electromagnetic hash. That would only happen from
- a) control electronics, which will surely only be on one cable/circuit; or
- b) power choppers ("dimmers") which could be on 1 or all of the circuits, but there'd be no useful reason to have them on more than 1 circuit.
Also, there's a thing I don't like about how Ecosmarts are installed - they expect you to cram three #8 cables through one 1" hole, which is a lot to ask, and requires just the right cable clamps to not violate Code.
I would install a 6" square deep or larger metal box right below the EcoSmart and a short EMT conduit nipple connecting it to the EcoSmart's wiring hole. Bring the 3 cables into the large box with correct clamps; leaving space for up to 3 "surge suppressors" to be fit onto 3 knockouts.
Then I would consult with EcoSmart and ask them a) which circuit powers the control electronics and b) whether they merely switch all 3 heaters, or whether they use power choppers, and if they do, on which circuit(s).
On the circuits which do not use choppers or electronics, those can be wired straight through the 6" box, up the conduit nipple and to the terminals.
For the circuit(s) which do use choppers or electronics, you run a pigtail from the EcoSmart's terminal into this box. Then you mount a "surge suppressor" in one of the knockouts (or not, if it's a type that can live inside the junction box e.g. Meanwell SPD-20-277P). Then join those wires to the power line from the panel. This wires the Ecosmart and the suppressor in parallel (the usual way you "tee" a connection) - it's not wired in series like a switch.
At this point, the surge suppressor(s) should be damping out the EM interference before it leaves the metal faraday cage of the Ecosmart + junction box.
I suppose Ecosmart could build this into the product, but that would raise the price-point, and so you might not have selected the product.
First, make sure that your three supply cables are paired properly. The unit has 3 heaters internally. There are several ways cables could be crossed that would result in power from 1 heater coming up one cable and returning on another cable. The heater would work properly, but would kick stupid large amounts of EMF from the two imbalanced cables. Just double-check it.
Or, the heater may be throwing high frequency electromagnetic hash, with the cable(s) becoming antennas and making this worse. Now, electric resistive heating elements, alone, do not throw electromagnetic hash. That would only happen from
- a) control electronics, which will surely only be on one cable/circuit; or
- b) power choppers ("dimmers") which could be on 1 or all of the circuits, but there'd be no useful reason to have them on more than 1 circuit.
Also, there's a thing I don't like about how Ecosmarts are installed - they expect you to cram three #8 cables through one 1" hole, which is a lot to ask, and requires just the right cable clamps to not violate Code.
I would install a 6" square deep or larger metal box right below the EcoSmart and a short EMT conduit nipple connecting it to the EcoSmart's wiring hole. Bring the 3 cables into the large box with correct clamps; leaving space for up to 3 "surge suppressors" to be fit onto 3 knockouts.
Then I would consult with EcoSmart and ask them a) which circuit powers the control electronics and b) whether they merely switch all 3 heaters, or whether they use power choppers, and if they do, on which circuit(s).
On the circuits which do not use choppers or electronics, those can be wired straight through the 6" box, up the conduit nipple and to the terminals.
For the circuit(s) which do use choppers or electronics, you run a pigtail from the EcoSmart's terminal into this box. Then you mount a "surge suppressor" in one of the knockouts (or not, if it's a type that can live inside the junction box e.g. Meanwell SPD-20-277P). Then join those wires to the power line from the panel. This wires the Ecosmart and the suppressor in parallel (the usual way you "tee" a connection) - it's not wired in series like a switch.
At this point, the surge suppressor(s) should be damping out the EM interference before it leaves the metal faraday cage of the Ecosmart + junction box.
I suppose Ecosmart could build this into the product, but that would raise the price-point, and so you might not have selected the product.
edited May 25 at 4:48
answered May 24 at 17:25
HarperHarper
80.9k555162
80.9k555162
Thanks for this input. I'm 99% sure the cables are paired correctly as they are all color coded red/black and grouped by breaker by the panel, and grouped by input on the heater. Regarding imbalanced cables: So if a line and load aren't grouped on the same cable then the load produces an EMF because it doesn't have the line to cancel it out? Good to know.
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:13
@JonBarker Current flows in loops. It flows up wire 1 and returns on wire 2. (or sometimes is split, returning on wires 2 and 3). Each direction kicks up rather large EMF in proportion to current. If the wires are tightly bound together (i.e. in a cable), the large EMFs are equal and opposite - and cancel each other out. Hence no reading on a clamp ammeter.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:22
1
Note that an Arlington NM843 connector can fit 3 8/2s into a 1" KO (in fact, it can fit an 8/3 and 2 6/2s)
– ThreePhaseEel
May 24 at 23:09
@ThreePhaseEel thanks. I hope EcoSmart includes one, if people were left on their own to find it, I'd expect most DIYers and many electricians to use the wrong thing.
– Harper
May 25 at 4:49
add a comment |
Thanks for this input. I'm 99% sure the cables are paired correctly as they are all color coded red/black and grouped by breaker by the panel, and grouped by input on the heater. Regarding imbalanced cables: So if a line and load aren't grouped on the same cable then the load produces an EMF because it doesn't have the line to cancel it out? Good to know.
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:13
@JonBarker Current flows in loops. It flows up wire 1 and returns on wire 2. (or sometimes is split, returning on wires 2 and 3). Each direction kicks up rather large EMF in proportion to current. If the wires are tightly bound together (i.e. in a cable), the large EMFs are equal and opposite - and cancel each other out. Hence no reading on a clamp ammeter.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:22
1
Note that an Arlington NM843 connector can fit 3 8/2s into a 1" KO (in fact, it can fit an 8/3 and 2 6/2s)
– ThreePhaseEel
May 24 at 23:09
@ThreePhaseEel thanks. I hope EcoSmart includes one, if people were left on their own to find it, I'd expect most DIYers and many electricians to use the wrong thing.
– Harper
May 25 at 4:49
Thanks for this input. I'm 99% sure the cables are paired correctly as they are all color coded red/black and grouped by breaker by the panel, and grouped by input on the heater. Regarding imbalanced cables: So if a line and load aren't grouped on the same cable then the load produces an EMF because it doesn't have the line to cancel it out? Good to know.
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:13
Thanks for this input. I'm 99% sure the cables are paired correctly as they are all color coded red/black and grouped by breaker by the panel, and grouped by input on the heater. Regarding imbalanced cables: So if a line and load aren't grouped on the same cable then the load produces an EMF because it doesn't have the line to cancel it out? Good to know.
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:13
@JonBarker Current flows in loops. It flows up wire 1 and returns on wire 2. (or sometimes is split, returning on wires 2 and 3). Each direction kicks up rather large EMF in proportion to current. If the wires are tightly bound together (i.e. in a cable), the large EMFs are equal and opposite - and cancel each other out. Hence no reading on a clamp ammeter.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:22
@JonBarker Current flows in loops. It flows up wire 1 and returns on wire 2. (or sometimes is split, returning on wires 2 and 3). Each direction kicks up rather large EMF in proportion to current. If the wires are tightly bound together (i.e. in a cable), the large EMFs are equal and opposite - and cancel each other out. Hence no reading on a clamp ammeter.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:22
1
1
Note that an Arlington NM843 connector can fit 3 8/2s into a 1" KO (in fact, it can fit an 8/3 and 2 6/2s)
– ThreePhaseEel
May 24 at 23:09
Note that an Arlington NM843 connector can fit 3 8/2s into a 1" KO (in fact, it can fit an 8/3 and 2 6/2s)
– ThreePhaseEel
May 24 at 23:09
@ThreePhaseEel thanks. I hope EcoSmart includes one, if people were left on their own to find it, I'd expect most DIYers and many electricians to use the wrong thing.
– Harper
May 25 at 4:49
@ThreePhaseEel thanks. I hope EcoSmart includes one, if people were left on their own to find it, I'd expect most DIYers and many electricians to use the wrong thing.
– Harper
May 25 at 4:49
add a comment |
Long shot...if I'm wrong I'll delete.
112 Amps is a HUGE draw. As you probably know, many houses have a total 100 Amp (sometimes less) service. If your service drop isn't significantly larger, or even if it is but the utility didn't provision it well (e.g., they can, as I understand from other questions regarding service-entrance vs. "other" cables for 100A and similar sizes, downsize a good bit based on normal expected usage), then you could have a significant dip every time the heater kicks in. While the DSL modem is likely designed to handle a range of voltages, that still might be enough to cause problems. Similar to the way a laser printer on a 15A circuit can cause enough of a dip to reset some devices or at least to lower voltage enough for a few seconds that a UPS will treat it as an outage.
The right way to test this would be to monitor the voltage on the line powering the DSL modem as the heater starts up. If your voltages drops from 115V to 95V (or something like that) then the modem may simply not handle the low voltage and/or the voltage change well and lose the signal.
The secondary ways to test this are:
- See if lights (especially incandescent as LED will often handle voltage fluctuations just fine) dim when the heater starts up.
- Plug the modem (and while you're at it, the router and any other nearby computer-related devices, except laser printers) into a UPS. I use APC, but any decent model will do fine and I think it is a great investment - one didn't-reboot-during-a-thunderstorm can make it worth it even if it doesn't help for this problem. If the internet stays "live" with the modem & router on a UPS then you have your answer - and your fix.
1
A good possibility. These are resistive elements, so they should not have any startup surge at all. Voltage drop will be exactly the same throughout heater operation as during heater start (unless the heater "throttles up and down" by cutting out elements, in which case my query about cable matching becomes relevant.)
– Harper
May 24 at 16:58
Thanks for the input here - doesn't apply for me, but may be useful for others so won't downvote. My incoming current is 200amp on the main panel breaker, and the DSL modem/router is already on a UPS which will be maintaining a steady 120v
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:02
Aha! The UPS is the key - the utility could say 200A and still there could be issues if it was marginal in some way. But the UPS rules out my theory, at least in your case.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 18:16
3
oh, yes, this. Just because they provision 200A service does not mean they're not using the same #6Al service drop from when they provisioned 60A. Difference being, now they have a smart meter, which will notify them "Hey, I just saw a 19 volt voltage drop" or "hey, this guy is actually drawing 110 amps" (which they then run against their database showing a #6Al drop). In theory, after the system has collected enough data, it'll open a ticket to change your service drop to something appropriate, without you lifting a finger.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:28
1
@JonBarker Try plugging the modem straight into the wall and switching the UPS off completely. It's possible that when the input voltage sags as you turn on the heater, the UPS kicks in and starts boosting the voltage to 120 V, creating a lot of interference in the process.
– TooTea
May 25 at 13:21
add a comment |
Long shot...if I'm wrong I'll delete.
112 Amps is a HUGE draw. As you probably know, many houses have a total 100 Amp (sometimes less) service. If your service drop isn't significantly larger, or even if it is but the utility didn't provision it well (e.g., they can, as I understand from other questions regarding service-entrance vs. "other" cables for 100A and similar sizes, downsize a good bit based on normal expected usage), then you could have a significant dip every time the heater kicks in. While the DSL modem is likely designed to handle a range of voltages, that still might be enough to cause problems. Similar to the way a laser printer on a 15A circuit can cause enough of a dip to reset some devices or at least to lower voltage enough for a few seconds that a UPS will treat it as an outage.
The right way to test this would be to monitor the voltage on the line powering the DSL modem as the heater starts up. If your voltages drops from 115V to 95V (or something like that) then the modem may simply not handle the low voltage and/or the voltage change well and lose the signal.
The secondary ways to test this are:
- See if lights (especially incandescent as LED will often handle voltage fluctuations just fine) dim when the heater starts up.
- Plug the modem (and while you're at it, the router and any other nearby computer-related devices, except laser printers) into a UPS. I use APC, but any decent model will do fine and I think it is a great investment - one didn't-reboot-during-a-thunderstorm can make it worth it even if it doesn't help for this problem. If the internet stays "live" with the modem & router on a UPS then you have your answer - and your fix.
1
A good possibility. These are resistive elements, so they should not have any startup surge at all. Voltage drop will be exactly the same throughout heater operation as during heater start (unless the heater "throttles up and down" by cutting out elements, in which case my query about cable matching becomes relevant.)
– Harper
May 24 at 16:58
Thanks for the input here - doesn't apply for me, but may be useful for others so won't downvote. My incoming current is 200amp on the main panel breaker, and the DSL modem/router is already on a UPS which will be maintaining a steady 120v
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:02
Aha! The UPS is the key - the utility could say 200A and still there could be issues if it was marginal in some way. But the UPS rules out my theory, at least in your case.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 18:16
3
oh, yes, this. Just because they provision 200A service does not mean they're not using the same #6Al service drop from when they provisioned 60A. Difference being, now they have a smart meter, which will notify them "Hey, I just saw a 19 volt voltage drop" or "hey, this guy is actually drawing 110 amps" (which they then run against their database showing a #6Al drop). In theory, after the system has collected enough data, it'll open a ticket to change your service drop to something appropriate, without you lifting a finger.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:28
1
@JonBarker Try plugging the modem straight into the wall and switching the UPS off completely. It's possible that when the input voltage sags as you turn on the heater, the UPS kicks in and starts boosting the voltage to 120 V, creating a lot of interference in the process.
– TooTea
May 25 at 13:21
add a comment |
Long shot...if I'm wrong I'll delete.
112 Amps is a HUGE draw. As you probably know, many houses have a total 100 Amp (sometimes less) service. If your service drop isn't significantly larger, or even if it is but the utility didn't provision it well (e.g., they can, as I understand from other questions regarding service-entrance vs. "other" cables for 100A and similar sizes, downsize a good bit based on normal expected usage), then you could have a significant dip every time the heater kicks in. While the DSL modem is likely designed to handle a range of voltages, that still might be enough to cause problems. Similar to the way a laser printer on a 15A circuit can cause enough of a dip to reset some devices or at least to lower voltage enough for a few seconds that a UPS will treat it as an outage.
The right way to test this would be to monitor the voltage on the line powering the DSL modem as the heater starts up. If your voltages drops from 115V to 95V (or something like that) then the modem may simply not handle the low voltage and/or the voltage change well and lose the signal.
The secondary ways to test this are:
- See if lights (especially incandescent as LED will often handle voltage fluctuations just fine) dim when the heater starts up.
- Plug the modem (and while you're at it, the router and any other nearby computer-related devices, except laser printers) into a UPS. I use APC, but any decent model will do fine and I think it is a great investment - one didn't-reboot-during-a-thunderstorm can make it worth it even if it doesn't help for this problem. If the internet stays "live" with the modem & router on a UPS then you have your answer - and your fix.
Long shot...if I'm wrong I'll delete.
112 Amps is a HUGE draw. As you probably know, many houses have a total 100 Amp (sometimes less) service. If your service drop isn't significantly larger, or even if it is but the utility didn't provision it well (e.g., they can, as I understand from other questions regarding service-entrance vs. "other" cables for 100A and similar sizes, downsize a good bit based on normal expected usage), then you could have a significant dip every time the heater kicks in. While the DSL modem is likely designed to handle a range of voltages, that still might be enough to cause problems. Similar to the way a laser printer on a 15A circuit can cause enough of a dip to reset some devices or at least to lower voltage enough for a few seconds that a UPS will treat it as an outage.
The right way to test this would be to monitor the voltage on the line powering the DSL modem as the heater starts up. If your voltages drops from 115V to 95V (or something like that) then the modem may simply not handle the low voltage and/or the voltage change well and lose the signal.
The secondary ways to test this are:
- See if lights (especially incandescent as LED will often handle voltage fluctuations just fine) dim when the heater starts up.
- Plug the modem (and while you're at it, the router and any other nearby computer-related devices, except laser printers) into a UPS. I use APC, but any decent model will do fine and I think it is a great investment - one didn't-reboot-during-a-thunderstorm can make it worth it even if it doesn't help for this problem. If the internet stays "live" with the modem & router on a UPS then you have your answer - and your fix.
answered May 24 at 16:05
manassehkatzmanassehkatz
12.9k11845
12.9k11845
1
A good possibility. These are resistive elements, so they should not have any startup surge at all. Voltage drop will be exactly the same throughout heater operation as during heater start (unless the heater "throttles up and down" by cutting out elements, in which case my query about cable matching becomes relevant.)
– Harper
May 24 at 16:58
Thanks for the input here - doesn't apply for me, but may be useful for others so won't downvote. My incoming current is 200amp on the main panel breaker, and the DSL modem/router is already on a UPS which will be maintaining a steady 120v
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:02
Aha! The UPS is the key - the utility could say 200A and still there could be issues if it was marginal in some way. But the UPS rules out my theory, at least in your case.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 18:16
3
oh, yes, this. Just because they provision 200A service does not mean they're not using the same #6Al service drop from when they provisioned 60A. Difference being, now they have a smart meter, which will notify them "Hey, I just saw a 19 volt voltage drop" or "hey, this guy is actually drawing 110 amps" (which they then run against their database showing a #6Al drop). In theory, after the system has collected enough data, it'll open a ticket to change your service drop to something appropriate, without you lifting a finger.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:28
1
@JonBarker Try plugging the modem straight into the wall and switching the UPS off completely. It's possible that when the input voltage sags as you turn on the heater, the UPS kicks in and starts boosting the voltage to 120 V, creating a lot of interference in the process.
– TooTea
May 25 at 13:21
add a comment |
1
A good possibility. These are resistive elements, so they should not have any startup surge at all. Voltage drop will be exactly the same throughout heater operation as during heater start (unless the heater "throttles up and down" by cutting out elements, in which case my query about cable matching becomes relevant.)
– Harper
May 24 at 16:58
Thanks for the input here - doesn't apply for me, but may be useful for others so won't downvote. My incoming current is 200amp on the main panel breaker, and the DSL modem/router is already on a UPS which will be maintaining a steady 120v
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:02
Aha! The UPS is the key - the utility could say 200A and still there could be issues if it was marginal in some way. But the UPS rules out my theory, at least in your case.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 18:16
3
oh, yes, this. Just because they provision 200A service does not mean they're not using the same #6Al service drop from when they provisioned 60A. Difference being, now they have a smart meter, which will notify them "Hey, I just saw a 19 volt voltage drop" or "hey, this guy is actually drawing 110 amps" (which they then run against their database showing a #6Al drop). In theory, after the system has collected enough data, it'll open a ticket to change your service drop to something appropriate, without you lifting a finger.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:28
1
@JonBarker Try plugging the modem straight into the wall and switching the UPS off completely. It's possible that when the input voltage sags as you turn on the heater, the UPS kicks in and starts boosting the voltage to 120 V, creating a lot of interference in the process.
– TooTea
May 25 at 13:21
1
1
A good possibility. These are resistive elements, so they should not have any startup surge at all. Voltage drop will be exactly the same throughout heater operation as during heater start (unless the heater "throttles up and down" by cutting out elements, in which case my query about cable matching becomes relevant.)
– Harper
May 24 at 16:58
A good possibility. These are resistive elements, so they should not have any startup surge at all. Voltage drop will be exactly the same throughout heater operation as during heater start (unless the heater "throttles up and down" by cutting out elements, in which case my query about cable matching becomes relevant.)
– Harper
May 24 at 16:58
Thanks for the input here - doesn't apply for me, but may be useful for others so won't downvote. My incoming current is 200amp on the main panel breaker, and the DSL modem/router is already on a UPS which will be maintaining a steady 120v
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:02
Thanks for the input here - doesn't apply for me, but may be useful for others so won't downvote. My incoming current is 200amp on the main panel breaker, and the DSL modem/router is already on a UPS which will be maintaining a steady 120v
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 18:02
Aha! The UPS is the key - the utility could say 200A and still there could be issues if it was marginal in some way. But the UPS rules out my theory, at least in your case.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 18:16
Aha! The UPS is the key - the utility could say 200A and still there could be issues if it was marginal in some way. But the UPS rules out my theory, at least in your case.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 18:16
3
3
oh, yes, this. Just because they provision 200A service does not mean they're not using the same #6Al service drop from when they provisioned 60A. Difference being, now they have a smart meter, which will notify them "Hey, I just saw a 19 volt voltage drop" or "hey, this guy is actually drawing 110 amps" (which they then run against their database showing a #6Al drop). In theory, after the system has collected enough data, it'll open a ticket to change your service drop to something appropriate, without you lifting a finger.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:28
oh, yes, this. Just because they provision 200A service does not mean they're not using the same #6Al service drop from when they provisioned 60A. Difference being, now they have a smart meter, which will notify them "Hey, I just saw a 19 volt voltage drop" or "hey, this guy is actually drawing 110 amps" (which they then run against their database showing a #6Al drop). In theory, after the system has collected enough data, it'll open a ticket to change your service drop to something appropriate, without you lifting a finger.
– Harper
May 24 at 18:28
1
1
@JonBarker Try plugging the modem straight into the wall and switching the UPS off completely. It's possible that when the input voltage sags as you turn on the heater, the UPS kicks in and starts boosting the voltage to 120 V, creating a lot of interference in the process.
– TooTea
May 25 at 13:21
@JonBarker Try plugging the modem straight into the wall and switching the UPS off completely. It's possible that when the input voltage sags as you turn on the heater, the UPS kicks in and starts boosting the voltage to 120 V, creating a lot of interference in the process.
– TooTea
May 25 at 13:21
add a comment |
Find out what the DSL modem sees.
DSL is designed to detect and avoid all kinds of interference entering the line. Technically, it splits up the whole band into many narrow channels, continuously monitors them for noise and only uses the noise-free ones to transmit data. Any interference should thus just make the line slower but not kill it completely. Also, the low-frequency end of the spectrum is often reserved for voice and completely ignored by DSL, so the 60 Hz current into the heater might not matter at all.
Instead of playing around with the heater to try to figure out what's going wrong, check out the diagnostics on the DSL modem. When you log into its web management interface (by entering its IP address into your address bar and logging in, possibly with default passwords that should be either in the manual or on a label on the unit), you should be able to find some "DSL Status" tab showing what's actually going on with the line.
There will be something like Line State
saying up
, showtime
, synchronized
or so. Does that change when you flip the breaker?
If it doesn't, look for something like Noise Margin
. That will probably change a lot if the line starts picking up a new source of interference. That in turn leads to Attainable Data Rate
dropping as the modem stops using the noisiest channels.
There will also be something like Line Attenuation
and Signal Attenuation
. This probably won't change as it measures how much signal is lost along the way to the DSLAM.
That's a good way to confirm the times, and that something is messing up the DSL signal. If the modem doesn't have such logging, then the ISP may be able to organise a line test across a certain time window. Downside, it doesn't show why the water heater is causing the interference, just that the timing lines up and confirms the heater switching as the cause.
– Criggie
May 25 at 21:41
add a comment |
Find out what the DSL modem sees.
DSL is designed to detect and avoid all kinds of interference entering the line. Technically, it splits up the whole band into many narrow channels, continuously monitors them for noise and only uses the noise-free ones to transmit data. Any interference should thus just make the line slower but not kill it completely. Also, the low-frequency end of the spectrum is often reserved for voice and completely ignored by DSL, so the 60 Hz current into the heater might not matter at all.
Instead of playing around with the heater to try to figure out what's going wrong, check out the diagnostics on the DSL modem. When you log into its web management interface (by entering its IP address into your address bar and logging in, possibly with default passwords that should be either in the manual or on a label on the unit), you should be able to find some "DSL Status" tab showing what's actually going on with the line.
There will be something like Line State
saying up
, showtime
, synchronized
or so. Does that change when you flip the breaker?
If it doesn't, look for something like Noise Margin
. That will probably change a lot if the line starts picking up a new source of interference. That in turn leads to Attainable Data Rate
dropping as the modem stops using the noisiest channels.
There will also be something like Line Attenuation
and Signal Attenuation
. This probably won't change as it measures how much signal is lost along the way to the DSLAM.
That's a good way to confirm the times, and that something is messing up the DSL signal. If the modem doesn't have such logging, then the ISP may be able to organise a line test across a certain time window. Downside, it doesn't show why the water heater is causing the interference, just that the timing lines up and confirms the heater switching as the cause.
– Criggie
May 25 at 21:41
add a comment |
Find out what the DSL modem sees.
DSL is designed to detect and avoid all kinds of interference entering the line. Technically, it splits up the whole band into many narrow channels, continuously monitors them for noise and only uses the noise-free ones to transmit data. Any interference should thus just make the line slower but not kill it completely. Also, the low-frequency end of the spectrum is often reserved for voice and completely ignored by DSL, so the 60 Hz current into the heater might not matter at all.
Instead of playing around with the heater to try to figure out what's going wrong, check out the diagnostics on the DSL modem. When you log into its web management interface (by entering its IP address into your address bar and logging in, possibly with default passwords that should be either in the manual or on a label on the unit), you should be able to find some "DSL Status" tab showing what's actually going on with the line.
There will be something like Line State
saying up
, showtime
, synchronized
or so. Does that change when you flip the breaker?
If it doesn't, look for something like Noise Margin
. That will probably change a lot if the line starts picking up a new source of interference. That in turn leads to Attainable Data Rate
dropping as the modem stops using the noisiest channels.
There will also be something like Line Attenuation
and Signal Attenuation
. This probably won't change as it measures how much signal is lost along the way to the DSLAM.
Find out what the DSL modem sees.
DSL is designed to detect and avoid all kinds of interference entering the line. Technically, it splits up the whole band into many narrow channels, continuously monitors them for noise and only uses the noise-free ones to transmit data. Any interference should thus just make the line slower but not kill it completely. Also, the low-frequency end of the spectrum is often reserved for voice and completely ignored by DSL, so the 60 Hz current into the heater might not matter at all.
Instead of playing around with the heater to try to figure out what's going wrong, check out the diagnostics on the DSL modem. When you log into its web management interface (by entering its IP address into your address bar and logging in, possibly with default passwords that should be either in the manual or on a label on the unit), you should be able to find some "DSL Status" tab showing what's actually going on with the line.
There will be something like Line State
saying up
, showtime
, synchronized
or so. Does that change when you flip the breaker?
If it doesn't, look for something like Noise Margin
. That will probably change a lot if the line starts picking up a new source of interference. That in turn leads to Attainable Data Rate
dropping as the modem stops using the noisiest channels.
There will also be something like Line Attenuation
and Signal Attenuation
. This probably won't change as it measures how much signal is lost along the way to the DSLAM.
edited May 25 at 13:24
answered May 25 at 13:17
TooTeaTooTea
1416
1416
That's a good way to confirm the times, and that something is messing up the DSL signal. If the modem doesn't have such logging, then the ISP may be able to organise a line test across a certain time window. Downside, it doesn't show why the water heater is causing the interference, just that the timing lines up and confirms the heater switching as the cause.
– Criggie
May 25 at 21:41
add a comment |
That's a good way to confirm the times, and that something is messing up the DSL signal. If the modem doesn't have such logging, then the ISP may be able to organise a line test across a certain time window. Downside, it doesn't show why the water heater is causing the interference, just that the timing lines up and confirms the heater switching as the cause.
– Criggie
May 25 at 21:41
That's a good way to confirm the times, and that something is messing up the DSL signal. If the modem doesn't have such logging, then the ISP may be able to organise a line test across a certain time window. Downside, it doesn't show why the water heater is causing the interference, just that the timing lines up and confirms the heater switching as the cause.
– Criggie
May 25 at 21:41
That's a good way to confirm the times, and that something is messing up the DSL signal. If the modem doesn't have such logging, then the ISP may be able to organise a line test across a certain time window. Downside, it doesn't show why the water heater is causing the interference, just that the timing lines up and confirms the heater switching as the cause.
– Criggie
May 25 at 21:41
add a comment |
112A will induce voltages in any cables (phone connections) anywhere near that massive power-line you have.
What is meant by the term "split-phase" - is this single phase or guessing by the use of "3x 40amp dual pole breakers" a system where a 3 phase supply is split into 3 single phases?
If so, I strongly doubt it meets current electrical regulations...
2
"Split phase" is the normal North American system of 240V --> 2 x 120V. 3 x 40A is really to get 120A total, but is done as 3 x 40A because that makes the wiring & breakers a whole lot easier. Each of those 40A is 240V == hot/hot/ground. Just think of it as 3 dryer or oven or conventional water heater circuits, but all feeding into one on-demand heater.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:23
1
Yuck! - do they really allow that!!!
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:24
3
It's the latest thing. I have my own reasons why I wouldn't do that, and it makes a lot more sense to me if done with natural gas (though arguably if you can get "green" power then electric is better for the environment). I think the concept is: why heat up 50 gallons and let it sit if you only need hot water once in a while.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:25
2
@JeremyBoden Of course they do. They're not paralleling; the unit has 3 heaters each <40A fully isolated from each other. Nothing wrong with that! A very sensible way to get that much power. Multiple smallish cables is better than 1 big one (ask if you want to know why). Also, this allows use on 3-phase - 240V "delta" (US), 208 "wye" (US) or 220V "wye" (Brazil) both delta-connected, or 400V "wye" (Europe). Or even 480V "wye" US with bucking transformers or different heating elements. At that point you are wiring the appliance with 3-4 wires.
– Harper
May 24 at 17:36
1
I'd argue that multiple circuit breakers for one device is rather peculiar. Can't see that multiple heaters on dedicated wiring is better than one heater on one connection.
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
112A will induce voltages in any cables (phone connections) anywhere near that massive power-line you have.
What is meant by the term "split-phase" - is this single phase or guessing by the use of "3x 40amp dual pole breakers" a system where a 3 phase supply is split into 3 single phases?
If so, I strongly doubt it meets current electrical regulations...
2
"Split phase" is the normal North American system of 240V --> 2 x 120V. 3 x 40A is really to get 120A total, but is done as 3 x 40A because that makes the wiring & breakers a whole lot easier. Each of those 40A is 240V == hot/hot/ground. Just think of it as 3 dryer or oven or conventional water heater circuits, but all feeding into one on-demand heater.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:23
1
Yuck! - do they really allow that!!!
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:24
3
It's the latest thing. I have my own reasons why I wouldn't do that, and it makes a lot more sense to me if done with natural gas (though arguably if you can get "green" power then electric is better for the environment). I think the concept is: why heat up 50 gallons and let it sit if you only need hot water once in a while.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:25
2
@JeremyBoden Of course they do. They're not paralleling; the unit has 3 heaters each <40A fully isolated from each other. Nothing wrong with that! A very sensible way to get that much power. Multiple smallish cables is better than 1 big one (ask if you want to know why). Also, this allows use on 3-phase - 240V "delta" (US), 208 "wye" (US) or 220V "wye" (Brazil) both delta-connected, or 400V "wye" (Europe). Or even 480V "wye" US with bucking transformers or different heating elements. At that point you are wiring the appliance with 3-4 wires.
– Harper
May 24 at 17:36
1
I'd argue that multiple circuit breakers for one device is rather peculiar. Can't see that multiple heaters on dedicated wiring is better than one heater on one connection.
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
112A will induce voltages in any cables (phone connections) anywhere near that massive power-line you have.
What is meant by the term "split-phase" - is this single phase or guessing by the use of "3x 40amp dual pole breakers" a system where a 3 phase supply is split into 3 single phases?
If so, I strongly doubt it meets current electrical regulations...
112A will induce voltages in any cables (phone connections) anywhere near that massive power-line you have.
What is meant by the term "split-phase" - is this single phase or guessing by the use of "3x 40amp dual pole breakers" a system where a 3 phase supply is split into 3 single phases?
If so, I strongly doubt it meets current electrical regulations...
answered May 24 at 17:19
Jeremy BodenJeremy Boden
512
512
2
"Split phase" is the normal North American system of 240V --> 2 x 120V. 3 x 40A is really to get 120A total, but is done as 3 x 40A because that makes the wiring & breakers a whole lot easier. Each of those 40A is 240V == hot/hot/ground. Just think of it as 3 dryer or oven or conventional water heater circuits, but all feeding into one on-demand heater.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:23
1
Yuck! - do they really allow that!!!
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:24
3
It's the latest thing. I have my own reasons why I wouldn't do that, and it makes a lot more sense to me if done with natural gas (though arguably if you can get "green" power then electric is better for the environment). I think the concept is: why heat up 50 gallons and let it sit if you only need hot water once in a while.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:25
2
@JeremyBoden Of course they do. They're not paralleling; the unit has 3 heaters each <40A fully isolated from each other. Nothing wrong with that! A very sensible way to get that much power. Multiple smallish cables is better than 1 big one (ask if you want to know why). Also, this allows use on 3-phase - 240V "delta" (US), 208 "wye" (US) or 220V "wye" (Brazil) both delta-connected, or 400V "wye" (Europe). Or even 480V "wye" US with bucking transformers or different heating elements. At that point you are wiring the appliance with 3-4 wires.
– Harper
May 24 at 17:36
1
I'd argue that multiple circuit breakers for one device is rather peculiar. Can't see that multiple heaters on dedicated wiring is better than one heater on one connection.
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
2
"Split phase" is the normal North American system of 240V --> 2 x 120V. 3 x 40A is really to get 120A total, but is done as 3 x 40A because that makes the wiring & breakers a whole lot easier. Each of those 40A is 240V == hot/hot/ground. Just think of it as 3 dryer or oven or conventional water heater circuits, but all feeding into one on-demand heater.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:23
1
Yuck! - do they really allow that!!!
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:24
3
It's the latest thing. I have my own reasons why I wouldn't do that, and it makes a lot more sense to me if done with natural gas (though arguably if you can get "green" power then electric is better for the environment). I think the concept is: why heat up 50 gallons and let it sit if you only need hot water once in a while.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:25
2
@JeremyBoden Of course they do. They're not paralleling; the unit has 3 heaters each <40A fully isolated from each other. Nothing wrong with that! A very sensible way to get that much power. Multiple smallish cables is better than 1 big one (ask if you want to know why). Also, this allows use on 3-phase - 240V "delta" (US), 208 "wye" (US) or 220V "wye" (Brazil) both delta-connected, or 400V "wye" (Europe). Or even 480V "wye" US with bucking transformers or different heating elements. At that point you are wiring the appliance with 3-4 wires.
– Harper
May 24 at 17:36
1
I'd argue that multiple circuit breakers for one device is rather peculiar. Can't see that multiple heaters on dedicated wiring is better than one heater on one connection.
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:44
2
2
"Split phase" is the normal North American system of 240V --> 2 x 120V. 3 x 40A is really to get 120A total, but is done as 3 x 40A because that makes the wiring & breakers a whole lot easier. Each of those 40A is 240V == hot/hot/ground. Just think of it as 3 dryer or oven or conventional water heater circuits, but all feeding into one on-demand heater.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:23
"Split phase" is the normal North American system of 240V --> 2 x 120V. 3 x 40A is really to get 120A total, but is done as 3 x 40A because that makes the wiring & breakers a whole lot easier. Each of those 40A is 240V == hot/hot/ground. Just think of it as 3 dryer or oven or conventional water heater circuits, but all feeding into one on-demand heater.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:23
1
1
Yuck! - do they really allow that!!!
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:24
Yuck! - do they really allow that!!!
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:24
3
3
It's the latest thing. I have my own reasons why I wouldn't do that, and it makes a lot more sense to me if done with natural gas (though arguably if you can get "green" power then electric is better for the environment). I think the concept is: why heat up 50 gallons and let it sit if you only need hot water once in a while.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:25
It's the latest thing. I have my own reasons why I wouldn't do that, and it makes a lot more sense to me if done with natural gas (though arguably if you can get "green" power then electric is better for the environment). I think the concept is: why heat up 50 gallons and let it sit if you only need hot water once in a while.
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 17:25
2
2
@JeremyBoden Of course they do. They're not paralleling; the unit has 3 heaters each <40A fully isolated from each other. Nothing wrong with that! A very sensible way to get that much power. Multiple smallish cables is better than 1 big one (ask if you want to know why). Also, this allows use on 3-phase - 240V "delta" (US), 208 "wye" (US) or 220V "wye" (Brazil) both delta-connected, or 400V "wye" (Europe). Or even 480V "wye" US with bucking transformers or different heating elements. At that point you are wiring the appliance with 3-4 wires.
– Harper
May 24 at 17:36
@JeremyBoden Of course they do. They're not paralleling; the unit has 3 heaters each <40A fully isolated from each other. Nothing wrong with that! A very sensible way to get that much power. Multiple smallish cables is better than 1 big one (ask if you want to know why). Also, this allows use on 3-phase - 240V "delta" (US), 208 "wye" (US) or 220V "wye" (Brazil) both delta-connected, or 400V "wye" (Europe). Or even 480V "wye" US with bucking transformers or different heating elements. At that point you are wiring the appliance with 3-4 wires.
– Harper
May 24 at 17:36
1
1
I'd argue that multiple circuit breakers for one device is rather peculiar. Can't see that multiple heaters on dedicated wiring is better than one heater on one connection.
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:44
I'd argue that multiple circuit breakers for one device is rather peculiar. Can't see that multiple heaters on dedicated wiring is better than one heater on one connection.
– Jeremy Boden
May 24 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
Jon Barker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jon Barker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jon Barker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jon Barker is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f165793%2finstalled-electric-tankless-water-heater-internet-loss-when-active%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Probably accurate - dslreports.com/faq/8511
– TEEKAY
May 24 at 13:58
1
Where does the phone line run in relation to the supply for the water heater? Is your phone system properly bonded to your electrical grounding system? Are all connections tight, screw terminals etc? You could try powering the DSL modem off a battery or UPS temporarily to see if that relieves the issue.
– PhilippNagel
May 24 at 14:00
1
Must be because the internet is a bunch of tubes :-)
– manassehkatz
May 24 at 14:13
1
@manassehkatz I guess i plumbed it in wrong, should have attached the cold source to the phone line :)
– Jon Barker
May 24 at 14:13
2
The video is correct. Was this followed correctly in your installation? Reason I'm asking is that exchanging two reds for instance, the heater will function normally, but will throw a huge 60Hz magnetic field between the cables. A simple way of testing this is to put a clamp ammeter around each cable one at a time. Anytime you clamp a whole cable, it should read near zero because currents should cancel each other out.
– Harper
May 24 at 15:57