Hexagonal Grid FillingA Trip to Ripple IslandsA spartan skeleton SudokuSkeleton sudoku, the secondA Knight's KuromasuThe Ludicrous Loop: over a thousand cells of circular logic!RPS Trinity - Teddy and Her RibbonHow does one go about creating a new grid-deduction puzzle?The Terrible Twos of Slitherlink Part DeuxFixing a Binairo MistakeIntersection Puzzle

return tuple of uncopyable objects

What is the best way for a skeleton to impersonate human without using magic?

Why is a set not a partition of itself?

Can a tourist shoot a gun in the USA?

What are the components of a legend (in the sense of a tale, not a figure legend)?

On what legal basis did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?

Could there be a material that inverts the colours seen through it?

In books, how many dragons are there in present time?

What's tha name for when you write multiple voices on same staff? And are there any cons?

What's the difference between "за ... от" and "в ... от"?

Do Life Drain attacks from wights stack?

Rounding a number extracted by jq to limit the decimal points

Finite Euclidean domain that is not field?

Tikz draw contour without some edges, and fill

On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder

How much Replacement does this axiom provide?

Anatomically Correct Carnivorous Tree

using `is` operator with value type tuples gives error

German characters on US-International keyboard layout

what does a native speaker say when he wanted to leave his work?

What information do scammers need to withdraw money from an account?

Developers demotivated due to working on same project for more than 2 years

Wireless headphones interfere with Wi-Fi signal on laptop

Does Lawful Interception of 4G / the proposed 5G provide a back door for hackers as well?



Hexagonal Grid Filling


A Trip to Ripple IslandsA spartan skeleton SudokuSkeleton sudoku, the secondA Knight's KuromasuThe Ludicrous Loop: over a thousand cells of circular logic!RPS Trinity - Teddy and Her RibbonHow does one go about creating a new grid-deduction puzzle?The Terrible Twos of Slitherlink Part DeuxFixing a Binairo MistakeIntersection Puzzle













17












$begingroup$


Fill in each blank white hexagon with a digit from 1 to 9. Each of the grey hexagons is the sum of the white hexagons around it, and all of the white hexagons that are around the same grey hexagon must be distinct.





The answer's already available, but I would like to see how people would logically solve this.



Source: USAMTS










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    17












    $begingroup$


    Fill in each blank white hexagon with a digit from 1 to 9. Each of the grey hexagons is the sum of the white hexagons around it, and all of the white hexagons that are around the same grey hexagon must be distinct.





    The answer's already available, but I would like to see how people would logically solve this.



    Source: USAMTS










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      17












      17








      17


      1



      $begingroup$


      Fill in each blank white hexagon with a digit from 1 to 9. Each of the grey hexagons is the sum of the white hexagons around it, and all of the white hexagons that are around the same grey hexagon must be distinct.





      The answer's already available, but I would like to see how people would logically solve this.



      Source: USAMTS










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Fill in each blank white hexagon with a digit from 1 to 9. Each of the grey hexagons is the sum of the white hexagons around it, and all of the white hexagons that are around the same grey hexagon must be distinct.





      The answer's already available, but I would like to see how people would logically solve this.



      Source: USAMTS







      grid-deduction






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 9 at 2:21









      Jason KimJason Kim

      37110




      37110




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          Building on shoover's answer, solving it step by step:



          • $30$ has 3 options, $[9, 8, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 1]$$[9, 7, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 2]$ and $[8, 7, 6, colorgray5, colorgray3, 1]$ (with gray indicating already known). As $4$ and $6$ already exist around $21$, the box shared by $21$ and $30$ must be either $1$ or $2$.


          • $26_top$ has 3 options, $[9, colorgray6, 5, 3, 2, 1]$, $[8, colorgray6, 5, 4, 2, 1]$ and $[7, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 1]$. Because $5$ already exists around $39$ the first option isn't applicable, and the two shared boxes with $39$ must be $4$ and $8/7$.


          • This means that the bottom of $39$ must be $9 + (8/7)$, depending on which one is around $26_top$. There is no solution for $26_bottom$ if it is $9 + 8$, so it must be $9 + 7$. This means that $8$ is around $26_top$, and $26_bottom$ is $[9, 7, 4, 3, colorgray2, 1]$.



                                                                




          • In all solutions for $30$ at this point, the only value it can share with $26_bottom$ beyond $9/7$ is $4$.


          • Since $32$ already has a $1$, we can place the remaining numbers around $26_bottom$.


          • Looking at the empty shared box between $32$ and $26_top$, the solution for $26_top$ dictates that this must be $5/2$. No solution exists for $32$ if its top-left box is $4$, so we can now place the $8/4$'s.



                                                                




          • There's no solution for $32$ if it is $9 + 2$, $7 + 5$ or $7 + 2$, so it must be $9 + 5$ with a solution of $[9, colorgray8, 6, 5, colorgray3, 1]$. This also places the $9/7$'s and the remaining around $32$.


          • The remaining boxes around $26_top$ are $2 + 1$. The only solution for $29$ is $[9, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 2]$, so their shared box must be $2$. This places the remaining around $26_top$.


          • The remaining around $29$ are $9 + 3$. As $21$ cannot have a $9$, their shared box must be $3$. This places the remaining around $29$.



                                                                




          • The remaining around $30$ are $9 + 2$. As $21$ cannot have $9$, this places the remaining blocks.


                                                                







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          Birjolaxew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$




















            12












            $begingroup$

            To get it started:




            • $21$ has to be $1+2+3+4+5+6$


            • $39$ has to be $9+8+7+6+5+4$


            • $21$ already has a $4$, so the overlap between $21$ and $39$ has to be $5$ and $6$, but $29$ already has a $5$, so it must get the $6$, while $30$ shares the $5$. (The hex shared by $21$, $30$, and $39$ is $5$, and the hex shared by $21$, $29$, and $39$ is $6$.)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              1












              $begingroup$

              This was really fun! After working it process of elimination after identifying max and min sums you can get from 6 digits 1-9, I was indeed able to solve.



              I solved by saving image and notating like I would a Sudoku puzzle with possible choices. When in doubt, I would take combinations and choose absolute smallest or largest combinations between two hexagons and see if the rest of the cells were workable. This eliminated quite a few possibilities.




              https://imgur.com/a/aIH1VLw







              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                My apologies if you were asking for a mathematical proof, btw!
                $endgroup$
                – Carley
                May 9 at 9:15











              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "559"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83776%2fhexagonal-grid-filling%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              8












              $begingroup$

              Building on shoover's answer, solving it step by step:



              • $30$ has 3 options, $[9, 8, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 1]$$[9, 7, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 2]$ and $[8, 7, 6, colorgray5, colorgray3, 1]$ (with gray indicating already known). As $4$ and $6$ already exist around $21$, the box shared by $21$ and $30$ must be either $1$ or $2$.


              • $26_top$ has 3 options, $[9, colorgray6, 5, 3, 2, 1]$, $[8, colorgray6, 5, 4, 2, 1]$ and $[7, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 1]$. Because $5$ already exists around $39$ the first option isn't applicable, and the two shared boxes with $39$ must be $4$ and $8/7$.


              • This means that the bottom of $39$ must be $9 + (8/7)$, depending on which one is around $26_top$. There is no solution for $26_bottom$ if it is $9 + 8$, so it must be $9 + 7$. This means that $8$ is around $26_top$, and $26_bottom$ is $[9, 7, 4, 3, colorgray2, 1]$.



                                                                    




              • In all solutions for $30$ at this point, the only value it can share with $26_bottom$ beyond $9/7$ is $4$.


              • Since $32$ already has a $1$, we can place the remaining numbers around $26_bottom$.


              • Looking at the empty shared box between $32$ and $26_top$, the solution for $26_top$ dictates that this must be $5/2$. No solution exists for $32$ if its top-left box is $4$, so we can now place the $8/4$'s.



                                                                    




              • There's no solution for $32$ if it is $9 + 2$, $7 + 5$ or $7 + 2$, so it must be $9 + 5$ with a solution of $[9, colorgray8, 6, 5, colorgray3, 1]$. This also places the $9/7$'s and the remaining around $32$.


              • The remaining boxes around $26_top$ are $2 + 1$. The only solution for $29$ is $[9, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 2]$, so their shared box must be $2$. This places the remaining around $26_top$.


              • The remaining around $29$ are $9 + 3$. As $21$ cannot have a $9$, their shared box must be $3$. This places the remaining around $29$.



                                                                    




              • The remaining around $30$ are $9 + 2$. As $21$ cannot have $9$, this places the remaining blocks.


                                                                    







              share|improve this answer










              New contributor



              Birjolaxew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              $endgroup$

















                8












                $begingroup$

                Building on shoover's answer, solving it step by step:



                • $30$ has 3 options, $[9, 8, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 1]$$[9, 7, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 2]$ and $[8, 7, 6, colorgray5, colorgray3, 1]$ (with gray indicating already known). As $4$ and $6$ already exist around $21$, the box shared by $21$ and $30$ must be either $1$ or $2$.


                • $26_top$ has 3 options, $[9, colorgray6, 5, 3, 2, 1]$, $[8, colorgray6, 5, 4, 2, 1]$ and $[7, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 1]$. Because $5$ already exists around $39$ the first option isn't applicable, and the two shared boxes with $39$ must be $4$ and $8/7$.


                • This means that the bottom of $39$ must be $9 + (8/7)$, depending on which one is around $26_top$. There is no solution for $26_bottom$ if it is $9 + 8$, so it must be $9 + 7$. This means that $8$ is around $26_top$, and $26_bottom$ is $[9, 7, 4, 3, colorgray2, 1]$.



                                                                      




                • In all solutions for $30$ at this point, the only value it can share with $26_bottom$ beyond $9/7$ is $4$.


                • Since $32$ already has a $1$, we can place the remaining numbers around $26_bottom$.


                • Looking at the empty shared box between $32$ and $26_top$, the solution for $26_top$ dictates that this must be $5/2$. No solution exists for $32$ if its top-left box is $4$, so we can now place the $8/4$'s.



                                                                      




                • There's no solution for $32$ if it is $9 + 2$, $7 + 5$ or $7 + 2$, so it must be $9 + 5$ with a solution of $[9, colorgray8, 6, 5, colorgray3, 1]$. This also places the $9/7$'s and the remaining around $32$.


                • The remaining boxes around $26_top$ are $2 + 1$. The only solution for $29$ is $[9, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 2]$, so their shared box must be $2$. This places the remaining around $26_top$.


                • The remaining around $29$ are $9 + 3$. As $21$ cannot have a $9$, their shared box must be $3$. This places the remaining around $29$.



                                                                      




                • The remaining around $30$ are $9 + 2$. As $21$ cannot have $9$, this places the remaining blocks.


                                                                      







                share|improve this answer










                New contributor



                Birjolaxew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                $endgroup$















                  8












                  8








                  8





                  $begingroup$

                  Building on shoover's answer, solving it step by step:



                  • $30$ has 3 options, $[9, 8, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 1]$$[9, 7, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 2]$ and $[8, 7, 6, colorgray5, colorgray3, 1]$ (with gray indicating already known). As $4$ and $6$ already exist around $21$, the box shared by $21$ and $30$ must be either $1$ or $2$.


                  • $26_top$ has 3 options, $[9, colorgray6, 5, 3, 2, 1]$, $[8, colorgray6, 5, 4, 2, 1]$ and $[7, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 1]$. Because $5$ already exists around $39$ the first option isn't applicable, and the two shared boxes with $39$ must be $4$ and $8/7$.


                  • This means that the bottom of $39$ must be $9 + (8/7)$, depending on which one is around $26_top$. There is no solution for $26_bottom$ if it is $9 + 8$, so it must be $9 + 7$. This means that $8$ is around $26_top$, and $26_bottom$ is $[9, 7, 4, 3, colorgray2, 1]$.



                                                                        




                  • In all solutions for $30$ at this point, the only value it can share with $26_bottom$ beyond $9/7$ is $4$.


                  • Since $32$ already has a $1$, we can place the remaining numbers around $26_bottom$.


                  • Looking at the empty shared box between $32$ and $26_top$, the solution for $26_top$ dictates that this must be $5/2$. No solution exists for $32$ if its top-left box is $4$, so we can now place the $8/4$'s.



                                                                        




                  • There's no solution for $32$ if it is $9 + 2$, $7 + 5$ or $7 + 2$, so it must be $9 + 5$ with a solution of $[9, colorgray8, 6, 5, colorgray3, 1]$. This also places the $9/7$'s and the remaining around $32$.


                  • The remaining boxes around $26_top$ are $2 + 1$. The only solution for $29$ is $[9, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 2]$, so their shared box must be $2$. This places the remaining around $26_top$.


                  • The remaining around $29$ are $9 + 3$. As $21$ cannot have a $9$, their shared box must be $3$. This places the remaining around $29$.



                                                                        




                  • The remaining around $30$ are $9 + 2$. As $21$ cannot have $9$, this places the remaining blocks.


                                                                        







                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor



                  Birjolaxew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  $endgroup$



                  Building on shoover's answer, solving it step by step:



                  • $30$ has 3 options, $[9, 8, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 1]$$[9, 7, colorgray5, 4, colorgray3, 2]$ and $[8, 7, 6, colorgray5, colorgray3, 1]$ (with gray indicating already known). As $4$ and $6$ already exist around $21$, the box shared by $21$ and $30$ must be either $1$ or $2$.


                  • $26_top$ has 3 options, $[9, colorgray6, 5, 3, 2, 1]$, $[8, colorgray6, 5, 4, 2, 1]$ and $[7, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 1]$. Because $5$ already exists around $39$ the first option isn't applicable, and the two shared boxes with $39$ must be $4$ and $8/7$.


                  • This means that the bottom of $39$ must be $9 + (8/7)$, depending on which one is around $26_top$. There is no solution for $26_bottom$ if it is $9 + 8$, so it must be $9 + 7$. This means that $8$ is around $26_top$, and $26_bottom$ is $[9, 7, 4, 3, colorgray2, 1]$.



                                                                        




                  • In all solutions for $30$ at this point, the only value it can share with $26_bottom$ beyond $9/7$ is $4$.


                  • Since $32$ already has a $1$, we can place the remaining numbers around $26_bottom$.


                  • Looking at the empty shared box between $32$ and $26_top$, the solution for $26_top$ dictates that this must be $5/2$. No solution exists for $32$ if its top-left box is $4$, so we can now place the $8/4$'s.



                                                                        




                  • There's no solution for $32$ if it is $9 + 2$, $7 + 5$ or $7 + 2$, so it must be $9 + 5$ with a solution of $[9, colorgray8, 6, 5, colorgray3, 1]$. This also places the $9/7$'s and the remaining around $32$.


                  • The remaining boxes around $26_top$ are $2 + 1$. The only solution for $29$ is $[9, colorgray6, 5, 4, 3, 2]$, so their shared box must be $2$. This places the remaining around $26_top$.


                  • The remaining around $29$ are $9 + 3$. As $21$ cannot have a $9$, their shared box must be $3$. This places the remaining around $29$.



                                                                        




                  • The remaining around $30$ are $9 + 2$. As $21$ cannot have $9$, this places the remaining blocks.


                                                                        








                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor



                  Birjolaxew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited May 9 at 10:48





















                  New contributor



                  Birjolaxew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  answered May 9 at 9:44









                  BirjolaxewBirjolaxew

                  1963




                  1963




                  New contributor



                  Birjolaxew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




                  New contributor




                  Birjolaxew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                      12












                      $begingroup$

                      To get it started:




                      • $21$ has to be $1+2+3+4+5+6$


                      • $39$ has to be $9+8+7+6+5+4$


                      • $21$ already has a $4$, so the overlap between $21$ and $39$ has to be $5$ and $6$, but $29$ already has a $5$, so it must get the $6$, while $30$ shares the $5$. (The hex shared by $21$, $30$, and $39$ is $5$, and the hex shared by $21$, $29$, and $39$ is $6$.)





                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        12












                        $begingroup$

                        To get it started:




                        • $21$ has to be $1+2+3+4+5+6$


                        • $39$ has to be $9+8+7+6+5+4$


                        • $21$ already has a $4$, so the overlap between $21$ and $39$ has to be $5$ and $6$, but $29$ already has a $5$, so it must get the $6$, while $30$ shares the $5$. (The hex shared by $21$, $30$, and $39$ is $5$, and the hex shared by $21$, $29$, and $39$ is $6$.)





                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          12












                          12








                          12





                          $begingroup$

                          To get it started:




                          • $21$ has to be $1+2+3+4+5+6$


                          • $39$ has to be $9+8+7+6+5+4$


                          • $21$ already has a $4$, so the overlap between $21$ and $39$ has to be $5$ and $6$, but $29$ already has a $5$, so it must get the $6$, while $30$ shares the $5$. (The hex shared by $21$, $30$, and $39$ is $5$, and the hex shared by $21$, $29$, and $39$ is $6$.)





                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          To get it started:




                          • $21$ has to be $1+2+3+4+5+6$


                          • $39$ has to be $9+8+7+6+5+4$


                          • $21$ already has a $4$, so the overlap between $21$ and $39$ has to be $5$ and $6$, but $29$ already has a $5$, so it must get the $6$, while $30$ shares the $5$. (The hex shared by $21$, $30$, and $39$ is $5$, and the hex shared by $21$, $29$, and $39$ is $6$.)






                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered May 9 at 3:18









                          shoovershoover

                          2,170615




                          2,170615





















                              1












                              $begingroup$

                              This was really fun! After working it process of elimination after identifying max and min sums you can get from 6 digits 1-9, I was indeed able to solve.



                              I solved by saving image and notating like I would a Sudoku puzzle with possible choices. When in doubt, I would take combinations and choose absolute smallest or largest combinations between two hexagons and see if the rest of the cells were workable. This eliminated quite a few possibilities.




                              https://imgur.com/a/aIH1VLw







                              share|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$












                              • $begingroup$
                                My apologies if you were asking for a mathematical proof, btw!
                                $endgroup$
                                – Carley
                                May 9 at 9:15















                              1












                              $begingroup$

                              This was really fun! After working it process of elimination after identifying max and min sums you can get from 6 digits 1-9, I was indeed able to solve.



                              I solved by saving image and notating like I would a Sudoku puzzle with possible choices. When in doubt, I would take combinations and choose absolute smallest or largest combinations between two hexagons and see if the rest of the cells were workable. This eliminated quite a few possibilities.




                              https://imgur.com/a/aIH1VLw







                              share|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$












                              • $begingroup$
                                My apologies if you were asking for a mathematical proof, btw!
                                $endgroup$
                                – Carley
                                May 9 at 9:15













                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              This was really fun! After working it process of elimination after identifying max and min sums you can get from 6 digits 1-9, I was indeed able to solve.



                              I solved by saving image and notating like I would a Sudoku puzzle with possible choices. When in doubt, I would take combinations and choose absolute smallest or largest combinations between two hexagons and see if the rest of the cells were workable. This eliminated quite a few possibilities.




                              https://imgur.com/a/aIH1VLw







                              share|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$



                              This was really fun! After working it process of elimination after identifying max and min sums you can get from 6 digits 1-9, I was indeed able to solve.



                              I solved by saving image and notating like I would a Sudoku puzzle with possible choices. When in doubt, I would take combinations and choose absolute smallest or largest combinations between two hexagons and see if the rest of the cells were workable. This eliminated quite a few possibilities.




                              https://imgur.com/a/aIH1VLw








                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited May 9 at 9:07

























                              answered May 9 at 8:56









                              CarleyCarley

                              35310




                              35310











                              • $begingroup$
                                My apologies if you were asking for a mathematical proof, btw!
                                $endgroup$
                                – Carley
                                May 9 at 9:15
















                              • $begingroup$
                                My apologies if you were asking for a mathematical proof, btw!
                                $endgroup$
                                – Carley
                                May 9 at 9:15















                              $begingroup$
                              My apologies if you were asking for a mathematical proof, btw!
                              $endgroup$
                              – Carley
                              May 9 at 9:15




                              $begingroup$
                              My apologies if you were asking for a mathematical proof, btw!
                              $endgroup$
                              – Carley
                              May 9 at 9:15

















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83776%2fhexagonal-grid-filling%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                              Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                              Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?