Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete spaceShow that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.Local homeomorphism and inverse imageHow do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?Why is the kernel of a covering group discrete?Why is the Long Line not a covering space for the CircleThe restriction of a covering map on the connected component of its definition domainFibers and they being discrete spaceLocal homeomorphisms which are not covering map?Alternative definition of covering spaces.A local homeomorphism between compact, connected, topological spacesProve that exist bijection between inverse image of covering spaceProof that a discrete space (with more than 1 element) is not connectedWhy does a Hausdorff but not countably compact space have an infinite closed discrete subset?
How can I make dummy text (like lipsum) grey?
SHAKE-128/256 or SHA3-256/512
Divisor Rich and Poor Numbers
Would a "ring language" be possible?
Why would you put your input amplifier in front of your filtering for and ECG signal?
Solenoid fastest possible release - for how long should reversed polarity be applied?
Why can't I share a one use code with anyone else?
Pedaling at different gear ratios on flat terrain: what's the point?
Why were the bells ignored in S8E5?
How can I fix the label locations on my tikzcd diagram?
Iterate lines of string variable in bash
Who is frowning in the sentence "Daisy looked at Tom frowning"?
Capital gains on stocks sold to take initial investment off the table
301 Redirects what does ([a-z]+)-(.*) and ([0-9]+)-(.*) mean
Canadian citizen who is presently in litigation with a US-based company
What technology would Dwarves need to forge titanium?
Working hours and productivity expectations for game artists and programmers
Usage of the relative pronoun "dont"
Why does the U.S military use mercenaries?
He is the first man to arrive here
multiline equation inside a matrix that is a part of multiline equation
Is there an academic word that means "to split hairs over"?
How does this piece of code determine array size without using sizeof( )?
Physically unpleasant work environment
Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete space
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.Local homeomorphism and inverse imageHow do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?Why is the kernel of a covering group discrete?Why is the Long Line not a covering space for the CircleThe restriction of a covering map on the connected component of its definition domainFibers and they being discrete spaceLocal homeomorphisms which are not covering map?Alternative definition of covering spaces.A local homeomorphism between compact, connected, topological spacesProve that exist bijection between inverse image of covering spaceProof that a discrete space (with more than 1 element) is not connectedWhy does a Hausdorff but not countably compact space have an infinite closed discrete subset?
$begingroup$
Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).
These are the posts I have read so far:
Local homeomorphism and inverse image
When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?
Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.
How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.
However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.
Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.
If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.
So, how can I prove this?
general-topology metric-spaces covering-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).
These are the posts I have read so far:
Local homeomorphism and inverse image
When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?
Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.
How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.
However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.
Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.
If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.
So, how can I prove this?
general-topology metric-spaces covering-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).
These are the posts I have read so far:
Local homeomorphism and inverse image
When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?
Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.
How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.
However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.
Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.
If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.
So, how can I prove this?
general-topology metric-spaces covering-spaces
$endgroup$
Let $f: X rightarrow Y$ be a local homeomorphism. I want to prove that, for each $y in Y$, the fiber $f^-1(y)$ is a discrete set, or discrete space (Is there any difference between these two last terms?).
These are the posts I have read so far:
Local homeomorphism and inverse image
When is a local homeomorphism a covering map?
Showing the fibre over a point in a covering map is a discrete space.
How do I show that a topological space is discrete if all its subsets are closed?
Show that in a discrete metric space, every subset is both open and closed.
However, I have not been able to fully understand the proof. Some of the posts start the proof by mentioning that the fact that $f$ is a local homeomorphism implies that the fiber is finite; but I do not understand where does that come from, even after browsing MathSE and Wikipedia.
Other posts try instead to prove that the fiber is finite, and they do so by first stating that the fiber is a discrete space. All of this make it look like circular reasoning, which does not make sense to me.
If there is a concept I do not know, I am willing to visit places like Wikipedia or Subwiki.org ; however this time I have not been able to understand the proof even after reading many articles.
So, how can I prove this?
general-topology metric-spaces covering-spaces
general-topology metric-spaces covering-spaces
edited May 12 at 6:14
Henno Brandsma
120k351130
120k351130
asked May 11 at 20:17
evaristegdevaristegd
16511
16511
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3222556%2fproof-that-the-inverse-image-of-a-single-element-is-a-discrete-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
$endgroup$
Fix $yin Y$ and $xin f^-1(y)$. Since $f$ is a local homeomorphism, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that $f|U : Uto f(U)$ is a homeomorphism. If $zin Ucap f^-1(y)$, then $f(z) = y = f(x)$; since both $z, xin U$, injectivity of $f|U$ implies $z = x$. Therefore $Ucap f^-1(y) = x$. As $x$ was arbitrary, $f^-1(y)$ is discrete.
answered May 11 at 20:30
kobekobe
35.3k22248
35.3k22248
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
$endgroup$
Let $f:X to Y$ be a local homeomorphism.
Suppose $y in Y$ and let $x in F_y:=f^-1[y]$, the fibre of $y$.
Then $x$ has an open neighbourhood $U_x$ such that $f|_U_x: U_x to f[U_x]$ is a homeomorphism (by the definition of being a local homeomorphism).
In particular, $U_x cap F_y = x$ or else we have some $x' in U_x cap F_y$ which means $f(x')=f(x)=y$ while $x,x' in U_x$ contradicting the fact that $f|_U_x$ is injective (being a homeomorphism). So $U_x$ witnesses that $x$ is an isolated point of $F_y$, showing that $F_y$ is indeed discrete in the subspace topology.
Note that local injectivity is all we need.
answered May 11 at 20:30
Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma
120k351130
120k351130
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3222556%2fproof-that-the-inverse-image-of-a-single-element-is-a-discrete-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown