Understanding integration over Orthogonal GroupFundamental Theorem of Calculus problemIntegrating the exponential of a complex quadratic matrixMaurer-Cartan Form on orthogonal groupSymplectic group actionhow to get this matrix?Dual space and covectors: force, work and energyInvariant metric of a matrix Lie Group as induced metric in R^(n^2)Matrix integration over the orthogonal groupLeft invariant vector fields, exampleCalculate the length of parameterized curve. (Lacking intuitive understanding of subject)

Is there any deeper thematic meaning to the white horse that Arya finds in The Bells (S08E05)?

What would a Dragon have to exhale to cause rain?

Cannot remove door knob -- totally inaccessible!

Can I pay my credit card?

Iterate lines of string variable in bash

​Cuban​ ​Primes

Five Powers of Fives Produce Unique Pandigital Number...Solve for X..Tell me Y

"Counterexample" for the Inverse function theorem

Why are there five extra turns in tournament Magic?

301 Redirects what does ([a-z]+)-(.*) and ([0-9]+)-(.*) mean

Why did Varys remove his rings?

Polynomial division: Is this trick obvious?

How can I make dummy text (like lipsum) grey?

Is it standard for US-based universities to consider the ethnicity of an applicant during PhD admissions?

Divisor Rich and Poor Numbers

Would it be fair to use 1d30 (instead of rolling 2d20 and taking the higher die) for advantage rolls?

How does this piece of code determine array size without using sizeof( )?

Promotion comes with unexpected 24/7/365 on-call

Is it possible to pass a pointer to an operator as an argument like a pointer to a function?

What technology would Dwarves need to forge titanium?

What color to choose as "danger" if the main color of my app is red

How to know the path of a particular software?

Canadian citizen who is presently in litigation with a US-based company

Cross products/avoiding using your hand for the right hand rule in E and M



Understanding integration over Orthogonal Group


Fundamental Theorem of Calculus problemIntegrating the exponential of a complex quadratic matrixMaurer-Cartan Form on orthogonal groupSymplectic group actionhow to get this matrix?Dual space and covectors: force, work and energyInvariant metric of a matrix Lie Group as induced metric in R^(n^2)Matrix integration over the orthogonal groupLeft invariant vector fields, exampleCalculate the length of parameterized curve. (Lacking intuitive understanding of subject)













4












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be an $n times n$ matrix, and $O_n$ be the orthogonal group of $n times n$ matrix. Calculate $ m_1 = int_O_ntr(M)dV$ and $m_2 = int_O_n tr(M)^2dV$ where tr(M) is defined as the trace of M.



I was given the answer key, but I don't quite understand it. The answer key made the following claims:



" Since the volume integral is invariant under translation in the
orthogonal group, it is invariant under permuting the coordinates, and under
multiplying a row or column by −1. We have



$int_O_n tr(M) dV = int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$



Also



$int_O_ntr(M)^2dV = int_O_n (nM^2_11 + (n^2 -n) M_11 M_22dV = int_O_n n M^2_11dV = int_O_n sum_i M^2_1idV = int_O_n 1dV$"



I have very little understanding of this, specifically I don't understand the following:



  1. what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group


  2. Each step of $ int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$


with these two, I think I can figure out the rest. I would really appreciate it if anyone can help me, thanks in advance.




edit 1:



So from my understanding so far, $O_n$ can be seen as a set of point where the real_valued function, tr(M) is being integrated over. $M_11$ is integrated over $O_n$ as a constant function.



I still don't quite understand the part about permuting the $i^th$ row and column of M to the first row and column is equal to $int_O_n M_11dV$



If M is given by beginbmatrix a & b \c & d endbmatrix
then $int_O_2 tr(M)dV = int_O_2 (a + d) dV = 2 int_O_2 a dV$?
If so, then $2 int_O_2 a dV = 2 int_O_2 d dV = 2d int_O_2 dV = 2a int_O_2 dV$, then $a = d$ or $int_O_2 dV = 0$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    Let $M$ be an $n times n$ matrix, and $O_n$ be the orthogonal group of $n times n$ matrix. Calculate $ m_1 = int_O_ntr(M)dV$ and $m_2 = int_O_n tr(M)^2dV$ where tr(M) is defined as the trace of M.



    I was given the answer key, but I don't quite understand it. The answer key made the following claims:



    " Since the volume integral is invariant under translation in the
    orthogonal group, it is invariant under permuting the coordinates, and under
    multiplying a row or column by −1. We have



    $int_O_n tr(M) dV = int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$



    Also



    $int_O_ntr(M)^2dV = int_O_n (nM^2_11 + (n^2 -n) M_11 M_22dV = int_O_n n M^2_11dV = int_O_n sum_i M^2_1idV = int_O_n 1dV$"



    I have very little understanding of this, specifically I don't understand the following:



    1. what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group


    2. Each step of $ int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$


    with these two, I think I can figure out the rest. I would really appreciate it if anyone can help me, thanks in advance.




    edit 1:



    So from my understanding so far, $O_n$ can be seen as a set of point where the real_valued function, tr(M) is being integrated over. $M_11$ is integrated over $O_n$ as a constant function.



    I still don't quite understand the part about permuting the $i^th$ row and column of M to the first row and column is equal to $int_O_n M_11dV$



    If M is given by beginbmatrix a & b \c & d endbmatrix
    then $int_O_2 tr(M)dV = int_O_2 (a + d) dV = 2 int_O_2 a dV$?
    If so, then $2 int_O_2 a dV = 2 int_O_2 d dV = 2d int_O_2 dV = 2a int_O_2 dV$, then $a = d$ or $int_O_2 dV = 0$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $M$ be an $n times n$ matrix, and $O_n$ be the orthogonal group of $n times n$ matrix. Calculate $ m_1 = int_O_ntr(M)dV$ and $m_2 = int_O_n tr(M)^2dV$ where tr(M) is defined as the trace of M.



      I was given the answer key, but I don't quite understand it. The answer key made the following claims:



      " Since the volume integral is invariant under translation in the
      orthogonal group, it is invariant under permuting the coordinates, and under
      multiplying a row or column by −1. We have



      $int_O_n tr(M) dV = int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$



      Also



      $int_O_ntr(M)^2dV = int_O_n (nM^2_11 + (n^2 -n) M_11 M_22dV = int_O_n n M^2_11dV = int_O_n sum_i M^2_1idV = int_O_n 1dV$"



      I have very little understanding of this, specifically I don't understand the following:



      1. what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group


      2. Each step of $ int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$


      with these two, I think I can figure out the rest. I would really appreciate it if anyone can help me, thanks in advance.




      edit 1:



      So from my understanding so far, $O_n$ can be seen as a set of point where the real_valued function, tr(M) is being integrated over. $M_11$ is integrated over $O_n$ as a constant function.



      I still don't quite understand the part about permuting the $i^th$ row and column of M to the first row and column is equal to $int_O_n M_11dV$



      If M is given by beginbmatrix a & b \c & d endbmatrix
      then $int_O_2 tr(M)dV = int_O_2 (a + d) dV = 2 int_O_2 a dV$?
      If so, then $2 int_O_2 a dV = 2 int_O_2 d dV = 2d int_O_2 dV = 2a int_O_2 dV$, then $a = d$ or $int_O_2 dV = 0$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $M$ be an $n times n$ matrix, and $O_n$ be the orthogonal group of $n times n$ matrix. Calculate $ m_1 = int_O_ntr(M)dV$ and $m_2 = int_O_n tr(M)^2dV$ where tr(M) is defined as the trace of M.



      I was given the answer key, but I don't quite understand it. The answer key made the following claims:



      " Since the volume integral is invariant under translation in the
      orthogonal group, it is invariant under permuting the coordinates, and under
      multiplying a row or column by −1. We have



      $int_O_n tr(M) dV = int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$



      Also



      $int_O_ntr(M)^2dV = int_O_n (nM^2_11 + (n^2 -n) M_11 M_22dV = int_O_n n M^2_11dV = int_O_n sum_i M^2_1idV = int_O_n 1dV$"



      I have very little understanding of this, specifically I don't understand the following:



      1. what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group


      2. Each step of $ int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$


      with these two, I think I can figure out the rest. I would really appreciate it if anyone can help me, thanks in advance.




      edit 1:



      So from my understanding so far, $O_n$ can be seen as a set of point where the real_valued function, tr(M) is being integrated over. $M_11$ is integrated over $O_n$ as a constant function.



      I still don't quite understand the part about permuting the $i^th$ row and column of M to the first row and column is equal to $int_O_n M_11dV$



      If M is given by beginbmatrix a & b \c & d endbmatrix
      then $int_O_2 tr(M)dV = int_O_2 (a + d) dV = 2 int_O_2 a dV$?
      If so, then $2 int_O_2 a dV = 2 int_O_2 d dV = 2d int_O_2 dV = 2a int_O_2 dV$, then $a = d$ or $int_O_2 dV = 0$?







      integration differential-geometry volume






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited May 12 at 1:30







      William Ambrose

















      asked May 11 at 19:18









      William AmbroseWilliam Ambrose

      587




      587




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$


          what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group




          The orthogonal group is a locally compact group (in fact it is compact), therefore it admits a Haar measure (which is both right and left invariant). Basically this is a measure $dV$ on the Borel subsets of $O(n)$ which is invariant under translation by elements in $O(n)$. This should explain the first equality.




          Each step of $int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$




          Well first we clearly have that $int_O_n sum_i M_ii dV = sum_i int_O_n M_ii dV$. Consider one of these summands



          $$int_O_n M_ii dV$$ The point now is that we integrate over all matrices, this term is intuitively zero because for every matrix $M$ there will be a matrix $N$ such that $N_ii=-M_ii$. Formally we can permute rows and columns of $M$ by multiplying by some elementary matrix so by replacing the $i$'th row with the first row and the $i$'th column with the first column this equals to $int_O_n M_11 dV$. This proves the first equality.



          also by multiplying by the matrix which corresponds to multiplying the first row by $-1$ we have that $$int_O_n M_11 dV=int_O_n -M_11 dV$$ hence both the arguments are zero.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, I still have a bit more confusion, and I have edited my post. If you can help me with those, I will appreciate it a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – William Ambrose
            May 12 at 1:19










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamAmbrose $M_11$ is not a constant! (the same way that $tr(M)$ is not a constant) It changes as the matrix $M$ changes!
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 12 at 10:45



















          3












          $begingroup$

          Ok so for your first question what I think is meant is the following. A matrix $A in M_n times n (mathbbR)$ has $ n^2$ entries. So one can think of any matrix as a vector in $mathbbR^n^2$.



          That is to say one can define a bijection $phi : 1, ldots,n times 1, ldots, n rightarrow 1, ldots, n^2 $ which induces the following identification of matrices as vectors.



          $$alpha : M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR^n^2 text where M rightarrow (M_phi(i,j))$$



          Using that we can therefore integrate over functions of the form



          $$ f: M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR$$



          as



          $$int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL $$



          where in your case $A$ is the orthogonal group.



          Basically you are taking the matrices and flattening them until they're just vectors.



          Obviously the question now is the wether or not our integral depends on our choice of alpha. Luckily for us it does not and this comes down to the integral being invariant under reordering of the coordinates.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            (+1) - one point, you should use different symbol to denote the measure on $mathbbR^n^2$. I would write something like $int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL$ where $A$ is the orthogonal group and $mathcalL$ is the Lebesgue measure.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 11 at 20:05












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3222501%2funderstanding-integration-over-orthogonal-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$


          what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group




          The orthogonal group is a locally compact group (in fact it is compact), therefore it admits a Haar measure (which is both right and left invariant). Basically this is a measure $dV$ on the Borel subsets of $O(n)$ which is invariant under translation by elements in $O(n)$. This should explain the first equality.




          Each step of $int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$




          Well first we clearly have that $int_O_n sum_i M_ii dV = sum_i int_O_n M_ii dV$. Consider one of these summands



          $$int_O_n M_ii dV$$ The point now is that we integrate over all matrices, this term is intuitively zero because for every matrix $M$ there will be a matrix $N$ such that $N_ii=-M_ii$. Formally we can permute rows and columns of $M$ by multiplying by some elementary matrix so by replacing the $i$'th row with the first row and the $i$'th column with the first column this equals to $int_O_n M_11 dV$. This proves the first equality.



          also by multiplying by the matrix which corresponds to multiplying the first row by $-1$ we have that $$int_O_n M_11 dV=int_O_n -M_11 dV$$ hence both the arguments are zero.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, I still have a bit more confusion, and I have edited my post. If you can help me with those, I will appreciate it a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – William Ambrose
            May 12 at 1:19










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamAmbrose $M_11$ is not a constant! (the same way that $tr(M)$ is not a constant) It changes as the matrix $M$ changes!
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 12 at 10:45
















          3












          $begingroup$


          what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group




          The orthogonal group is a locally compact group (in fact it is compact), therefore it admits a Haar measure (which is both right and left invariant). Basically this is a measure $dV$ on the Borel subsets of $O(n)$ which is invariant under translation by elements in $O(n)$. This should explain the first equality.




          Each step of $int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$




          Well first we clearly have that $int_O_n sum_i M_ii dV = sum_i int_O_n M_ii dV$. Consider one of these summands



          $$int_O_n M_ii dV$$ The point now is that we integrate over all matrices, this term is intuitively zero because for every matrix $M$ there will be a matrix $N$ such that $N_ii=-M_ii$. Formally we can permute rows and columns of $M$ by multiplying by some elementary matrix so by replacing the $i$'th row with the first row and the $i$'th column with the first column this equals to $int_O_n M_11 dV$. This proves the first equality.



          also by multiplying by the matrix which corresponds to multiplying the first row by $-1$ we have that $$int_O_n M_11 dV=int_O_n -M_11 dV$$ hence both the arguments are zero.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, I still have a bit more confusion, and I have edited my post. If you can help me with those, I will appreciate it a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – William Ambrose
            May 12 at 1:19










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamAmbrose $M_11$ is not a constant! (the same way that $tr(M)$ is not a constant) It changes as the matrix $M$ changes!
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 12 at 10:45














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$


          what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group




          The orthogonal group is a locally compact group (in fact it is compact), therefore it admits a Haar measure (which is both right and left invariant). Basically this is a measure $dV$ on the Borel subsets of $O(n)$ which is invariant under translation by elements in $O(n)$. This should explain the first equality.




          Each step of $int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$




          Well first we clearly have that $int_O_n sum_i M_ii dV = sum_i int_O_n M_ii dV$. Consider one of these summands



          $$int_O_n M_ii dV$$ The point now is that we integrate over all matrices, this term is intuitively zero because for every matrix $M$ there will be a matrix $N$ such that $N_ii=-M_ii$. Formally we can permute rows and columns of $M$ by multiplying by some elementary matrix so by replacing the $i$'th row with the first row and the $i$'th column with the first column this equals to $int_O_n M_11 dV$. This proves the first equality.



          also by multiplying by the matrix which corresponds to multiplying the first row by $-1$ we have that $$int_O_n M_11 dV=int_O_n -M_11 dV$$ hence both the arguments are zero.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          what it means by integrating over the orthogonal group




          The orthogonal group is a locally compact group (in fact it is compact), therefore it admits a Haar measure (which is both right and left invariant). Basically this is a measure $dV$ on the Borel subsets of $O(n)$ which is invariant under translation by elements in $O(n)$. This should explain the first equality.




          Each step of $int_O_n sum_i M_iidV = nint_O_nM_11dV = 0$




          Well first we clearly have that $int_O_n sum_i M_ii dV = sum_i int_O_n M_ii dV$. Consider one of these summands



          $$int_O_n M_ii dV$$ The point now is that we integrate over all matrices, this term is intuitively zero because for every matrix $M$ there will be a matrix $N$ such that $N_ii=-M_ii$. Formally we can permute rows and columns of $M$ by multiplying by some elementary matrix so by replacing the $i$'th row with the first row and the $i$'th column with the first column this equals to $int_O_n M_11 dV$. This proves the first equality.



          also by multiplying by the matrix which corresponds to multiplying the first row by $-1$ we have that $$int_O_n M_11 dV=int_O_n -M_11 dV$$ hence both the arguments are zero.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered May 11 at 20:03









          YankoYanko

          8,9432830




          8,9432830











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, I still have a bit more confusion, and I have edited my post. If you can help me with those, I will appreciate it a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – William Ambrose
            May 12 at 1:19










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamAmbrose $M_11$ is not a constant! (the same way that $tr(M)$ is not a constant) It changes as the matrix $M$ changes!
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 12 at 10:45

















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, I still have a bit more confusion, and I have edited my post. If you can help me with those, I will appreciate it a lot.
            $endgroup$
            – William Ambrose
            May 12 at 1:19










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamAmbrose $M_11$ is not a constant! (the same way that $tr(M)$ is not a constant) It changes as the matrix $M$ changes!
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 12 at 10:45
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer, I still have a bit more confusion, and I have edited my post. If you can help me with those, I will appreciate it a lot.
          $endgroup$
          – William Ambrose
          May 12 at 1:19




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer, I still have a bit more confusion, and I have edited my post. If you can help me with those, I will appreciate it a lot.
          $endgroup$
          – William Ambrose
          May 12 at 1:19












          $begingroup$
          @WilliamAmbrose $M_11$ is not a constant! (the same way that $tr(M)$ is not a constant) It changes as the matrix $M$ changes!
          $endgroup$
          – Yanko
          May 12 at 10:45





          $begingroup$
          @WilliamAmbrose $M_11$ is not a constant! (the same way that $tr(M)$ is not a constant) It changes as the matrix $M$ changes!
          $endgroup$
          – Yanko
          May 12 at 10:45












          3












          $begingroup$

          Ok so for your first question what I think is meant is the following. A matrix $A in M_n times n (mathbbR)$ has $ n^2$ entries. So one can think of any matrix as a vector in $mathbbR^n^2$.



          That is to say one can define a bijection $phi : 1, ldots,n times 1, ldots, n rightarrow 1, ldots, n^2 $ which induces the following identification of matrices as vectors.



          $$alpha : M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR^n^2 text where M rightarrow (M_phi(i,j))$$



          Using that we can therefore integrate over functions of the form



          $$ f: M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR$$



          as



          $$int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL $$



          where in your case $A$ is the orthogonal group.



          Basically you are taking the matrices and flattening them until they're just vectors.



          Obviously the question now is the wether or not our integral depends on our choice of alpha. Luckily for us it does not and this comes down to the integral being invariant under reordering of the coordinates.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            (+1) - one point, you should use different symbol to denote the measure on $mathbbR^n^2$. I would write something like $int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL$ where $A$ is the orthogonal group and $mathcalL$ is the Lebesgue measure.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 11 at 20:05
















          3












          $begingroup$

          Ok so for your first question what I think is meant is the following. A matrix $A in M_n times n (mathbbR)$ has $ n^2$ entries. So one can think of any matrix as a vector in $mathbbR^n^2$.



          That is to say one can define a bijection $phi : 1, ldots,n times 1, ldots, n rightarrow 1, ldots, n^2 $ which induces the following identification of matrices as vectors.



          $$alpha : M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR^n^2 text where M rightarrow (M_phi(i,j))$$



          Using that we can therefore integrate over functions of the form



          $$ f: M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR$$



          as



          $$int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL $$



          where in your case $A$ is the orthogonal group.



          Basically you are taking the matrices and flattening them until they're just vectors.



          Obviously the question now is the wether or not our integral depends on our choice of alpha. Luckily for us it does not and this comes down to the integral being invariant under reordering of the coordinates.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            (+1) - one point, you should use different symbol to denote the measure on $mathbbR^n^2$. I would write something like $int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL$ where $A$ is the orthogonal group and $mathcalL$ is the Lebesgue measure.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 11 at 20:05














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Ok so for your first question what I think is meant is the following. A matrix $A in M_n times n (mathbbR)$ has $ n^2$ entries. So one can think of any matrix as a vector in $mathbbR^n^2$.



          That is to say one can define a bijection $phi : 1, ldots,n times 1, ldots, n rightarrow 1, ldots, n^2 $ which induces the following identification of matrices as vectors.



          $$alpha : M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR^n^2 text where M rightarrow (M_phi(i,j))$$



          Using that we can therefore integrate over functions of the form



          $$ f: M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR$$



          as



          $$int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL $$



          where in your case $A$ is the orthogonal group.



          Basically you are taking the matrices and flattening them until they're just vectors.



          Obviously the question now is the wether or not our integral depends on our choice of alpha. Luckily for us it does not and this comes down to the integral being invariant under reordering of the coordinates.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Ok so for your first question what I think is meant is the following. A matrix $A in M_n times n (mathbbR)$ has $ n^2$ entries. So one can think of any matrix as a vector in $mathbbR^n^2$.



          That is to say one can define a bijection $phi : 1, ldots,n times 1, ldots, n rightarrow 1, ldots, n^2 $ which induces the following identification of matrices as vectors.



          $$alpha : M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR^n^2 text where M rightarrow (M_phi(i,j))$$



          Using that we can therefore integrate over functions of the form



          $$ f: M_n times n (mathbbR) rightarrow mathbbR$$



          as



          $$int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL $$



          where in your case $A$ is the orthogonal group.



          Basically you are taking the matrices and flattening them until they're just vectors.



          Obviously the question now is the wether or not our integral depends on our choice of alpha. Luckily for us it does not and this comes down to the integral being invariant under reordering of the coordinates.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited May 12 at 13:23

























          answered May 11 at 19:59









          PaultjePaultje

          1207




          1207











          • $begingroup$
            (+1) - one point, you should use different symbol to denote the measure on $mathbbR^n^2$. I would write something like $int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL$ where $A$ is the orthogonal group and $mathcalL$ is the Lebesgue measure.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 11 at 20:05

















          • $begingroup$
            (+1) - one point, you should use different symbol to denote the measure on $mathbbR^n^2$. I would write something like $int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL$ where $A$ is the orthogonal group and $mathcalL$ is the Lebesgue measure.
            $endgroup$
            – Yanko
            May 11 at 20:05
















          $begingroup$
          (+1) - one point, you should use different symbol to denote the measure on $mathbbR^n^2$. I would write something like $int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL$ where $A$ is the orthogonal group and $mathcalL$ is the Lebesgue measure.
          $endgroup$
          – Yanko
          May 11 at 20:05





          $begingroup$
          (+1) - one point, you should use different symbol to denote the measure on $mathbbR^n^2$. I would write something like $int_A f dV = int_alpha(A)f circ alpha^-1(x) dmathcalL$ where $A$ is the orthogonal group and $mathcalL$ is the Lebesgue measure.
          $endgroup$
          – Yanko
          May 11 at 20:05


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3222501%2funderstanding-integration-over-orthogonal-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?