Why didn't this hurt this character as badly?What did the Scarlet Witch show the Hulk/Bruce Banner?Why was capturing this character so easy?Why didn't Thanos kill this character?How can Scarlet Witch hold off Thanos?Why didn't this character get involved earlier?Why didn't this character die even though they shot this person in Avengers: Endgame?Do we know what happened to this character in Avengers: Endgame?Can this character be alive?What is this character a reference to?How are the events from Infinity War possible if this character is dead?

Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!

Make some Prime Squares!

Why is Arya visibly scared in the library in S8E3?

How does this change to the opportunity attack rule impact combat?

Why are prions in animal diets not destroyed by the digestive system?

Is latino sine flexione dead?

If your medical expenses exceed your income does the IRS pay you?

Out of scope work duties and resignation

What property of a BJT transistor makes it an amplifier?

How wide is a neg symbol, how to get the width for alignment?

What was the design of the Macintosh II's MMU replacement?

Should I replace my bicycle tires if they have not been inflated in multiple years

Why Isn’t SQL More Refactorable?

How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?

Why is B♯ higher than C♭ in 31-ET?

Missing Piece of Pie - Can you find it?

What to use instead of cling film to wrap pastry

Getting a W on your transcript for grad school applications

Point of the the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?

Why doesn't WotC use established keywords on all new cards?

How did Kirk identify Gorgan in "And the Children Shall Lead"?

How can I get a job without pushing my family's income into a higher tax bracket?

Pressure inside an infinite ocean?

BOOM! Perfect Clear for Mr. T



Why didn't this hurt this character as badly?


What did the Scarlet Witch show the Hulk/Bruce Banner?Why was capturing this character so easy?Why didn't Thanos kill this character?How can Scarlet Witch hold off Thanos?Why didn't this character get involved earlier?Why didn't this character die even though they shot this person in Avengers: Endgame?Do we know what happened to this character in Avengers: Endgame?Can this character be alive?What is this character a reference to?How are the events from Infinity War possible if this character is dead?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9















In Avengers: Endgame




Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.




However




Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.




Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?










share|improve this question
























  • I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

    – Lefteris008
    Apr 28 at 16:13

















9















In Avengers: Endgame




Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.




However




Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.




Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?










share|improve this question
























  • I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

    – Lefteris008
    Apr 28 at 16:13













9












9








9








In Avengers: Endgame




Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.




However




Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.




Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?










share|improve this question
















In Avengers: Endgame




Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.




However




Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.




Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?







marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 28 at 16:15









TheLethalCarrot

55k21322372




55k21322372










asked Apr 28 at 16:07









GremerGremer

554615




554615












  • I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

    – Lefteris008
    Apr 28 at 16:13

















  • I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

    – Lefteris008
    Apr 28 at 16:13
















I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13





I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















15














Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



Avengers: Endgame




However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




Dies from it




Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.






share|improve this answer

























  • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 16:26






  • 5





    Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 19:37






  • 1





    I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 20:28






  • 4





    @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 23:12






  • 2





    @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

    – Gremer
    2 days ago


















2














  1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

  2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.





share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

    – Notts90
    yesterday











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211059%2fwhy-didnt-this-hurt-this-character-as-badly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









15














Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



Avengers: Endgame




However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




Dies from it




Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.






share|improve this answer

























  • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 16:26






  • 5





    Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 19:37






  • 1





    I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 20:28






  • 4





    @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 23:12






  • 2





    @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

    – Gremer
    2 days ago















15














Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



Avengers: Endgame




However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




Dies from it




Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.






share|improve this answer

























  • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 16:26






  • 5





    Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 19:37






  • 1





    I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 20:28






  • 4





    @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 23:12






  • 2





    @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

    – Gremer
    2 days ago













15












15








15







Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



Avengers: Endgame




However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




Dies from it




Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.






share|improve this answer















Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



Avengers: Endgame




However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




Dies from it




Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 28 at 19:41

























answered Apr 28 at 16:18









TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot

55k21322372




55k21322372












  • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 16:26






  • 5





    Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 19:37






  • 1





    I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 20:28






  • 4





    @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 23:12






  • 2





    @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

    – Gremer
    2 days ago

















  • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 16:26






  • 5





    Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 19:37






  • 1





    I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 20:28






  • 4





    @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 23:12






  • 2





    @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

    – Gremer
    2 days ago
















I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26





I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26




5




5





Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37





Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37




1




1





I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28





I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28




4




4





@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12





@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12




2




2





@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

– Gremer
2 days ago





@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

– Gremer
2 days ago













2














  1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

  2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.





share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

    – Notts90
    yesterday















2














  1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

  2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.





share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

    – Notts90
    yesterday













2












2








2







  1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

  2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.





share|improve this answer













  1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

  2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Stark07Stark07

11.4k75199




11.4k75199







  • 1





    You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

    – Notts90
    yesterday












  • 1





    You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

    – Notts90
    yesterday







1




1





You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

– Notts90
yesterday





You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

– Notts90
yesterday

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211059%2fwhy-didnt-this-hurt-this-character-as-badly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Grendel Contents Story Scholarship Depictions Notes References Navigation menu10.1093/notesj/gjn112Berserkeree

Area configuration aggregation error after install Porto themeMagento 2.1 CE Installed but front/backend not loading/workingCSS not loading on page within Magento 2 pageCannot install module in Magento 2no commands defined in the “setup” namespace. in Magento2Magento 2: Static files are present but shows 404Why do i have to always run the commands to clean cache in Magento 2.1.8?Failure reason: 'Unable to unserialize value.'Error 500 after magento migrationIn production mode the site does not loadMagento 2 : Error 500 after installing

Middle Expansion Olielle Resaix Definition: Uttering songs of triumph shouting with joy triumphant exulting Sejunction Journal 붙다 달 고급 품목 외출 The stretch trades the screeching tin. Definition: The act of speaking with a drawl a drawl Cough Sand Definition: An uproar a quarrel a noisy outbreak Shake Iron Publicize Horse House Baby 사과 Resaix Flaggy Jelly Temporary Unequaled Puppet A drop in the bucket Shrew 성격 회원 성질 미팅 The burn frames the tacky quality. Materialistic The smoke reduces the way. Yammoe Nondescript Cheek 얼굴 배 약하다 날리다 타다 The illegal country shows the iron. Help Rule Drearien Smoke Teaching Meaty Wasp Abraham Lincoln Jaws 진심 수리하다 Size Cork Idea Convert Think Lark John Lennon 거울 청소 군 추천하다 아이스크림