Smooth switching between 12 V batteries, with a toggle switch
Is the use of umgeben in the passive unusual?
How do we say "within a kilometer radius spherically"?
What is this Amiga 1200 mod?
Can a human be transformed into a Mind Flayer?
Solving this logarithmic problem
Are polynomials with the same roots identical?
Is it safe to change the harddrive power feature so that it never turns off?
Can you make an identity from this product?
Why is Na5 not played in this line of the French Defense, Advance Variation?
Varying the size of dots in a plot according to information contained in list
Is Lambda Calculus purely syntactic?
Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?
Why are MBA programs closing in the United States?
If I leave the US through an airport, do I have to return through the same airport?
What is the Leave No Trace way to dispose of coffee grounds?
Does the new finding on "reversing a quantum jump mid-flight" rule out any interpretations of QM?
Write a function that checks if a string starts with or contains something
How to write a convincing religious myth?
Is there a set of positive integers of density 1 which contains no infinite arithmetic progression?
Why did the World Bank set the global poverty line at $1.90?
Is it possible to have 2 different but equal size real number sets that have the same mean and standard deviation?
Who is "He that flies" in Lord of the Rings?
How can one's career as a reviewer be ended?
How to befriend someone who doesn't like to talk?
Smooth switching between 12 V batteries, with a toggle switch
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have a number of instruments (12 volts, drawing a few hundred milliamperes) that occasionally need to be switched between one of two 12 volt lead acid batteries.
The toggle switch is break-before-make, so there's a fraction of a second interruption to the supply that causes a couple of the instruments to re-boot.
The instruments are black-boxes, and I don't know what's in them or how they work.
How can I smooth-out the power drop during the switchover and prevent re-booting? Will a capacitor and resistor in series across the load side of the toggle switch be adequate?
The internal characteristics of the instruments are unknown to me (that's part of the problem), so I don't know what sort of interruption to the supply is acceptable. Also, there are several instruments that may or may not be switched on at the time, which adds to the complexity of the issue, so I'm looking for the simplest most generic solution that doesn't require much sophistication - that's why I was thinking of just a 12 V capacitor and resistor across the switch.
power batteries toggle-switch
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a number of instruments (12 volts, drawing a few hundred milliamperes) that occasionally need to be switched between one of two 12 volt lead acid batteries.
The toggle switch is break-before-make, so there's a fraction of a second interruption to the supply that causes a couple of the instruments to re-boot.
The instruments are black-boxes, and I don't know what's in them or how they work.
How can I smooth-out the power drop during the switchover and prevent re-booting? Will a capacitor and resistor in series across the load side of the toggle switch be adequate?
The internal characteristics of the instruments are unknown to me (that's part of the problem), so I don't know what sort of interruption to the supply is acceptable. Also, there are several instruments that may or may not be switched on at the time, which adds to the complexity of the issue, so I'm looking for the simplest most generic solution that doesn't require much sophistication - that's why I was thinking of just a 12 V capacitor and resistor across the switch.
power batteries toggle-switch
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
What dip in voltage is allowed in the transition period?
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
Jun 1 at 9:14
4
$begingroup$
a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:23
6
$begingroup$
I doubt that. Switches take a hit on "break", particularly when it is inductive. And the cap will deal with that. The hit on "make" isn't nearly as bad, and better still since the voltage diff on make will be fairly small due to the cap.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Jun 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
Wouldn't two switches work? First you switch one of them, then the other.
$endgroup$
– data
Jun 3 at 8:56
5
$begingroup$
A capacitor behind a switch can end up causing brutal inrush current spikes after "make" .... which might not cause sparks, but resistance welding...
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
Jun 3 at 10:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a number of instruments (12 volts, drawing a few hundred milliamperes) that occasionally need to be switched between one of two 12 volt lead acid batteries.
The toggle switch is break-before-make, so there's a fraction of a second interruption to the supply that causes a couple of the instruments to re-boot.
The instruments are black-boxes, and I don't know what's in them or how they work.
How can I smooth-out the power drop during the switchover and prevent re-booting? Will a capacitor and resistor in series across the load side of the toggle switch be adequate?
The internal characteristics of the instruments are unknown to me (that's part of the problem), so I don't know what sort of interruption to the supply is acceptable. Also, there are several instruments that may or may not be switched on at the time, which adds to the complexity of the issue, so I'm looking for the simplest most generic solution that doesn't require much sophistication - that's why I was thinking of just a 12 V capacitor and resistor across the switch.
power batteries toggle-switch
$endgroup$
I have a number of instruments (12 volts, drawing a few hundred milliamperes) that occasionally need to be switched between one of two 12 volt lead acid batteries.
The toggle switch is break-before-make, so there's a fraction of a second interruption to the supply that causes a couple of the instruments to re-boot.
The instruments are black-boxes, and I don't know what's in them or how they work.
How can I smooth-out the power drop during the switchover and prevent re-booting? Will a capacitor and resistor in series across the load side of the toggle switch be adequate?
The internal characteristics of the instruments are unknown to me (that's part of the problem), so I don't know what sort of interruption to the supply is acceptable. Also, there are several instruments that may or may not be switched on at the time, which adds to the complexity of the issue, so I'm looking for the simplest most generic solution that doesn't require much sophistication - that's why I was thinking of just a 12 V capacitor and resistor across the switch.
power batteries toggle-switch
power batteries toggle-switch
edited Jun 3 at 14:50
Peter Mortensen
1,58931422
1,58931422
asked Jun 1 at 9:11
ConanTheGerbilConanTheGerbil
23827
23827
2
$begingroup$
What dip in voltage is allowed in the transition period?
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
Jun 1 at 9:14
4
$begingroup$
a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:23
6
$begingroup$
I doubt that. Switches take a hit on "break", particularly when it is inductive. And the cap will deal with that. The hit on "make" isn't nearly as bad, and better still since the voltage diff on make will be fairly small due to the cap.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Jun 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
Wouldn't two switches work? First you switch one of them, then the other.
$endgroup$
– data
Jun 3 at 8:56
5
$begingroup$
A capacitor behind a switch can end up causing brutal inrush current spikes after "make" .... which might not cause sparks, but resistance welding...
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
Jun 3 at 10:35
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
What dip in voltage is allowed in the transition period?
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
Jun 1 at 9:14
4
$begingroup$
a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:23
6
$begingroup$
I doubt that. Switches take a hit on "break", particularly when it is inductive. And the cap will deal with that. The hit on "make" isn't nearly as bad, and better still since the voltage diff on make will be fairly small due to the cap.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Jun 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
Wouldn't two switches work? First you switch one of them, then the other.
$endgroup$
– data
Jun 3 at 8:56
5
$begingroup$
A capacitor behind a switch can end up causing brutal inrush current spikes after "make" .... which might not cause sparks, but resistance welding...
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
Jun 3 at 10:35
2
2
$begingroup$
What dip in voltage is allowed in the transition period?
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
Jun 1 at 9:14
$begingroup$
What dip in voltage is allowed in the transition period?
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
Jun 1 at 9:14
4
4
$begingroup$
a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:23
$begingroup$
a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:23
6
6
$begingroup$
I doubt that. Switches take a hit on "break", particularly when it is inductive. And the cap will deal with that. The hit on "make" isn't nearly as bad, and better still since the voltage diff on make will be fairly small due to the cap.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Jun 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
I doubt that. Switches take a hit on "break", particularly when it is inductive. And the cap will deal with that. The hit on "make" isn't nearly as bad, and better still since the voltage diff on make will be fairly small due to the cap.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Jun 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
Wouldn't two switches work? First you switch one of them, then the other.
$endgroup$
– data
Jun 3 at 8:56
$begingroup$
Wouldn't two switches work? First you switch one of them, then the other.
$endgroup$
– data
Jun 3 at 8:56
5
5
$begingroup$
A capacitor behind a switch can end up causing brutal inrush current spikes after "make" .... which might not cause sparks, but resistance welding...
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
Jun 3 at 10:35
$begingroup$
A capacitor behind a switch can end up causing brutal inrush current spikes after "make" .... which might not cause sparks, but resistance welding...
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
Jun 3 at 10:35
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A little simple maths:
In a capacitor charge, Q, and voltage, V, are related by $ Q = CV $.
Current is the rate of charge flow so, differentiation gives us $ I = frac dQdt = C frac dVdt $
You want to calculate your voltage drop for the duration of the switch transfer so we'll rearrange as
$$ C = frac Ifrac dvdt = I frac dtdv$$
So, throwing in some rough figures, we'll say you are drawing 250 mA, you can tolerate a 0.8 V drop and your switch takes 50 ms to throw then
$$ C = I frac dtdv = 0.25 frac 0.050.8 = 0.015 text F = 15,000 mu text F $$
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
Figure 1. The circuit.
@Jasen makes the point that "a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch". The point here is that a capacitor acts as a short-circuit when first connected to a power supply because it is completely discharged. As a result there will be an initial current surge through the already closed switch. You can use a beefy switch or add a current limiting resistor in series with C1.
Once initially charged the switching current will be close to the load current during each switch transision.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
use a switch rated for 20A or more to reduce contact burn.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 11:09
7
$begingroup$
I considered that but it's not switching 20 A but only a few hundred mA. It needs to be able to carry a high current for a very brief duration on power-up but that's all. The problem is that few datasheets will show a current-carrying rating as, in most applications, it's the switching rating that's important.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 1 at 11:28
4
$begingroup$
that brief time is when the contacts are bouncing, the worst time it could be,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 23:10
1
$begingroup$
I think we're envisaging different scenarios. In mine the initial surge is when the circuit is first powered up by connection of a battery, not by toggling the switch so the switch doesn't have to switch the current. Once the initial charge is complete all subsequent switching is just the load current plus a bit extra due to the voltage droop during switching.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 2 at 8:13
$begingroup$
@Jasen That brief time the contacts are not moving
$endgroup$
– slebetman
Jun 2 at 14:49
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You could add two Schottky diodes to the switch, allowing either battery to power the load via a diode. During switchover the voltage will drop 0.35 V (1N5817 @200 mA) below the voltage of the battery with the most charge, and it avoids the current surge caused by adding a capacitor. You could even remove the switch if a 3% power loss is acceptable.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
$endgroup$
14
$begingroup$
A fully charged lead acid is more than 0.5V above a discharged one, so connecting it will effectively make it pick up load immediately via the diode.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
@vidarlo two diodes instead of one, then?
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Jun 3 at 12:23
$begingroup$
No, one diode is fine
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 3 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might seem overly simplistic, but I have worked around this in the past with a simple momentary switch across the main toggle switch. Holding it in connects the two 12 V sources together while you flip the main. So at no point is the power interrupted. And with this the two sources are completely isolated during normal operation and cannot be accidentally left connected.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A lot of power may flow from the fully charged battery to the discharged battery when connected.
$endgroup$
– Ian Ringrose
Jun 4 at 9:02
$begingroup$
@IanRingrose That may or may not be a problem; in any case, it can mitigated with a resistor or such.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:22
$begingroup$
@George With the present setup, connecting the sources will not help much; the "break before make" switch will disconnect the load.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could check out the Texas instruments Power MUX range: link.
There are some 12V versions. I have a 5V one to switch LiPo batteries on a microprocessor but I do not think it reboots as it does not matter in my case.
They are not that expensive and you can get a evaluation module if you are not happy soldering small footprint components.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get a SP3T switch with make-before-break contacts to connect each battery to the one end contact. And both batteries to the middle contact via a Schottky power diode.
That way there will be no "dead time" during the switchover.
Finding a suitable switch may be tricky.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks @Jansen - I'm aware of this option, but as you mentioned finding a suitable switch isn't easy, and is made harder in my case because space is tight and the switches have to be very small.
$endgroup$
– ConanTheGerbil
Jun 1 at 9:32
1
$begingroup$
RS has them available but you have to buy 500
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you use two small switches make one break the other? Would it put too much strain on charger? It is a charger I assume? Or would it be too much strain on batteries due to different charge levels? Also, the original circuit diagram would help. This would assist a visual learner such as myself see the current configuration. Or switch it sooner before battery is so dead that it causes a drop. There is on market a smart switch made for automotive for deep cycle/starting battery combination. You mentioned little space so not sure it'll work for you.
There is a solution in someone's mind somewhere that will work perfectly.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Parts of this answer would work better as comments. Right this doesn’t directly answer the question, so is likely to be voted down. Worth remembering that Stack Exchange is not a discussion forum, it is a Q&A site.
$endgroup$
– David
Jun 2 at 21:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I use this device for pretty much exactly your problem:
http://www.mini-box.com/Y-PWR-Hot-Swap-Load-Sharing-Controller
I would assume it's easy for someone with experience in this area to duplicate if you'd rather roll your own.
Note: I have no affiliation with the site selling the above, and I'm not sure whether it's currently available being that there's no price listed, only "request quote". When I purchased it many years ago (probably nearly 10) it was inexpensive, though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on the context, this can be a hard or even a very hard problem.
If the load does not tolerate any interruptions, you have to make it a 2-step process w/ 2 diodes and a special switch that passes thru a state when both sources are on.
(or even 4-step if you don't want a diode constantly eating a volt, rotary switch becomes your friend).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f441437%2fsmooth-switching-between-12-v-batteries-with-a-toggle-switch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A little simple maths:
In a capacitor charge, Q, and voltage, V, are related by $ Q = CV $.
Current is the rate of charge flow so, differentiation gives us $ I = frac dQdt = C frac dVdt $
You want to calculate your voltage drop for the duration of the switch transfer so we'll rearrange as
$$ C = frac Ifrac dvdt = I frac dtdv$$
So, throwing in some rough figures, we'll say you are drawing 250 mA, you can tolerate a 0.8 V drop and your switch takes 50 ms to throw then
$$ C = I frac dtdv = 0.25 frac 0.050.8 = 0.015 text F = 15,000 mu text F $$
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
Figure 1. The circuit.
@Jasen makes the point that "a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch". The point here is that a capacitor acts as a short-circuit when first connected to a power supply because it is completely discharged. As a result there will be an initial current surge through the already closed switch. You can use a beefy switch or add a current limiting resistor in series with C1.
Once initially charged the switching current will be close to the load current during each switch transision.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
use a switch rated for 20A or more to reduce contact burn.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 11:09
7
$begingroup$
I considered that but it's not switching 20 A but only a few hundred mA. It needs to be able to carry a high current for a very brief duration on power-up but that's all. The problem is that few datasheets will show a current-carrying rating as, in most applications, it's the switching rating that's important.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 1 at 11:28
4
$begingroup$
that brief time is when the contacts are bouncing, the worst time it could be,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 23:10
1
$begingroup$
I think we're envisaging different scenarios. In mine the initial surge is when the circuit is first powered up by connection of a battery, not by toggling the switch so the switch doesn't have to switch the current. Once the initial charge is complete all subsequent switching is just the load current plus a bit extra due to the voltage droop during switching.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 2 at 8:13
$begingroup$
@Jasen That brief time the contacts are not moving
$endgroup$
– slebetman
Jun 2 at 14:49
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
A little simple maths:
In a capacitor charge, Q, and voltage, V, are related by $ Q = CV $.
Current is the rate of charge flow so, differentiation gives us $ I = frac dQdt = C frac dVdt $
You want to calculate your voltage drop for the duration of the switch transfer so we'll rearrange as
$$ C = frac Ifrac dvdt = I frac dtdv$$
So, throwing in some rough figures, we'll say you are drawing 250 mA, you can tolerate a 0.8 V drop and your switch takes 50 ms to throw then
$$ C = I frac dtdv = 0.25 frac 0.050.8 = 0.015 text F = 15,000 mu text F $$
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
Figure 1. The circuit.
@Jasen makes the point that "a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch". The point here is that a capacitor acts as a short-circuit when first connected to a power supply because it is completely discharged. As a result there will be an initial current surge through the already closed switch. You can use a beefy switch or add a current limiting resistor in series with C1.
Once initially charged the switching current will be close to the load current during each switch transision.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
use a switch rated for 20A or more to reduce contact burn.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 11:09
7
$begingroup$
I considered that but it's not switching 20 A but only a few hundred mA. It needs to be able to carry a high current for a very brief duration on power-up but that's all. The problem is that few datasheets will show a current-carrying rating as, in most applications, it's the switching rating that's important.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 1 at 11:28
4
$begingroup$
that brief time is when the contacts are bouncing, the worst time it could be,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 23:10
1
$begingroup$
I think we're envisaging different scenarios. In mine the initial surge is when the circuit is first powered up by connection of a battery, not by toggling the switch so the switch doesn't have to switch the current. Once the initial charge is complete all subsequent switching is just the load current plus a bit extra due to the voltage droop during switching.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 2 at 8:13
$begingroup$
@Jasen That brief time the contacts are not moving
$endgroup$
– slebetman
Jun 2 at 14:49
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
A little simple maths:
In a capacitor charge, Q, and voltage, V, are related by $ Q = CV $.
Current is the rate of charge flow so, differentiation gives us $ I = frac dQdt = C frac dVdt $
You want to calculate your voltage drop for the duration of the switch transfer so we'll rearrange as
$$ C = frac Ifrac dvdt = I frac dtdv$$
So, throwing in some rough figures, we'll say you are drawing 250 mA, you can tolerate a 0.8 V drop and your switch takes 50 ms to throw then
$$ C = I frac dtdv = 0.25 frac 0.050.8 = 0.015 text F = 15,000 mu text F $$
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
Figure 1. The circuit.
@Jasen makes the point that "a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch". The point here is that a capacitor acts as a short-circuit when first connected to a power supply because it is completely discharged. As a result there will be an initial current surge through the already closed switch. You can use a beefy switch or add a current limiting resistor in series with C1.
Once initially charged the switching current will be close to the load current during each switch transision.
$endgroup$
A little simple maths:
In a capacitor charge, Q, and voltage, V, are related by $ Q = CV $.
Current is the rate of charge flow so, differentiation gives us $ I = frac dQdt = C frac dVdt $
You want to calculate your voltage drop for the duration of the switch transfer so we'll rearrange as
$$ C = frac Ifrac dvdt = I frac dtdv$$
So, throwing in some rough figures, we'll say you are drawing 250 mA, you can tolerate a 0.8 V drop and your switch takes 50 ms to throw then
$$ C = I frac dtdv = 0.25 frac 0.050.8 = 0.015 text F = 15,000 mu text F $$
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
Figure 1. The circuit.
@Jasen makes the point that "a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch". The point here is that a capacitor acts as a short-circuit when first connected to a power supply because it is completely discharged. As a result there will be an initial current surge through the already closed switch. You can use a beefy switch or add a current limiting resistor in series with C1.
Once initially charged the switching current will be close to the load current during each switch transision.
edited Jun 2 at 8:14
answered Jun 1 at 9:31
TransistorTransistor
93k788203
93k788203
$begingroup$
use a switch rated for 20A or more to reduce contact burn.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 11:09
7
$begingroup$
I considered that but it's not switching 20 A but only a few hundred mA. It needs to be able to carry a high current for a very brief duration on power-up but that's all. The problem is that few datasheets will show a current-carrying rating as, in most applications, it's the switching rating that's important.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 1 at 11:28
4
$begingroup$
that brief time is when the contacts are bouncing, the worst time it could be,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 23:10
1
$begingroup$
I think we're envisaging different scenarios. In mine the initial surge is when the circuit is first powered up by connection of a battery, not by toggling the switch so the switch doesn't have to switch the current. Once the initial charge is complete all subsequent switching is just the load current plus a bit extra due to the voltage droop during switching.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 2 at 8:13
$begingroup$
@Jasen That brief time the contacts are not moving
$endgroup$
– slebetman
Jun 2 at 14:49
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
use a switch rated for 20A or more to reduce contact burn.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 11:09
7
$begingroup$
I considered that but it's not switching 20 A but only a few hundred mA. It needs to be able to carry a high current for a very brief duration on power-up but that's all. The problem is that few datasheets will show a current-carrying rating as, in most applications, it's the switching rating that's important.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 1 at 11:28
4
$begingroup$
that brief time is when the contacts are bouncing, the worst time it could be,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 23:10
1
$begingroup$
I think we're envisaging different scenarios. In mine the initial surge is when the circuit is first powered up by connection of a battery, not by toggling the switch so the switch doesn't have to switch the current. Once the initial charge is complete all subsequent switching is just the load current plus a bit extra due to the voltage droop during switching.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 2 at 8:13
$begingroup$
@Jasen That brief time the contacts are not moving
$endgroup$
– slebetman
Jun 2 at 14:49
$begingroup$
use a switch rated for 20A or more to reduce contact burn.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 11:09
$begingroup$
use a switch rated for 20A or more to reduce contact burn.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 11:09
7
7
$begingroup$
I considered that but it's not switching 20 A but only a few hundred mA. It needs to be able to carry a high current for a very brief duration on power-up but that's all. The problem is that few datasheets will show a current-carrying rating as, in most applications, it's the switching rating that's important.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 1 at 11:28
$begingroup$
I considered that but it's not switching 20 A but only a few hundred mA. It needs to be able to carry a high current for a very brief duration on power-up but that's all. The problem is that few datasheets will show a current-carrying rating as, in most applications, it's the switching rating that's important.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 1 at 11:28
4
4
$begingroup$
that brief time is when the contacts are bouncing, the worst time it could be,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 23:10
$begingroup$
that brief time is when the contacts are bouncing, the worst time it could be,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 23:10
1
1
$begingroup$
I think we're envisaging different scenarios. In mine the initial surge is when the circuit is first powered up by connection of a battery, not by toggling the switch so the switch doesn't have to switch the current. Once the initial charge is complete all subsequent switching is just the load current plus a bit extra due to the voltage droop during switching.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 2 at 8:13
$begingroup$
I think we're envisaging different scenarios. In mine the initial surge is when the circuit is first powered up by connection of a battery, not by toggling the switch so the switch doesn't have to switch the current. Once the initial charge is complete all subsequent switching is just the load current plus a bit extra due to the voltage droop during switching.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
Jun 2 at 8:13
$begingroup$
@Jasen That brief time the contacts are not moving
$endgroup$
– slebetman
Jun 2 at 14:49
$begingroup$
@Jasen That brief time the contacts are not moving
$endgroup$
– slebetman
Jun 2 at 14:49
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You could add two Schottky diodes to the switch, allowing either battery to power the load via a diode. During switchover the voltage will drop 0.35 V (1N5817 @200 mA) below the voltage of the battery with the most charge, and it avoids the current surge caused by adding a capacitor. You could even remove the switch if a 3% power loss is acceptable.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
$endgroup$
14
$begingroup$
A fully charged lead acid is more than 0.5V above a discharged one, so connecting it will effectively make it pick up load immediately via the diode.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
@vidarlo two diodes instead of one, then?
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Jun 3 at 12:23
$begingroup$
No, one diode is fine
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 3 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could add two Schottky diodes to the switch, allowing either battery to power the load via a diode. During switchover the voltage will drop 0.35 V (1N5817 @200 mA) below the voltage of the battery with the most charge, and it avoids the current surge caused by adding a capacitor. You could even remove the switch if a 3% power loss is acceptable.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
$endgroup$
14
$begingroup$
A fully charged lead acid is more than 0.5V above a discharged one, so connecting it will effectively make it pick up load immediately via the diode.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
@vidarlo two diodes instead of one, then?
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Jun 3 at 12:23
$begingroup$
No, one diode is fine
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 3 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could add two Schottky diodes to the switch, allowing either battery to power the load via a diode. During switchover the voltage will drop 0.35 V (1N5817 @200 mA) below the voltage of the battery with the most charge, and it avoids the current surge caused by adding a capacitor. You could even remove the switch if a 3% power loss is acceptable.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
$endgroup$
You could add two Schottky diodes to the switch, allowing either battery to power the load via a diode. During switchover the voltage will drop 0.35 V (1N5817 @200 mA) below the voltage of the battery with the most charge, and it avoids the current surge caused by adding a capacitor. You could even remove the switch if a 3% power loss is acceptable.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
edited Jun 3 at 10:13
Peter Mortensen
1,58931422
1,58931422
answered Jun 1 at 13:33
Tim StylesTim Styles
35915
35915
14
$begingroup$
A fully charged lead acid is more than 0.5V above a discharged one, so connecting it will effectively make it pick up load immediately via the diode.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
@vidarlo two diodes instead of one, then?
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Jun 3 at 12:23
$begingroup$
No, one diode is fine
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 3 at 12:25
add a comment |
14
$begingroup$
A fully charged lead acid is more than 0.5V above a discharged one, so connecting it will effectively make it pick up load immediately via the diode.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
@vidarlo two diodes instead of one, then?
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Jun 3 at 12:23
$begingroup$
No, one diode is fine
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 3 at 12:25
14
14
$begingroup$
A fully charged lead acid is more than 0.5V above a discharged one, so connecting it will effectively make it pick up load immediately via the diode.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
A fully charged lead acid is more than 0.5V above a discharged one, so connecting it will effectively make it pick up load immediately via the diode.
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 1 at 18:02
$begingroup$
@vidarlo two diodes instead of one, then?
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Jun 3 at 12:23
$begingroup$
@vidarlo two diodes instead of one, then?
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Jun 3 at 12:23
$begingroup$
No, one diode is fine
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 3 at 12:25
$begingroup$
No, one diode is fine
$endgroup$
– vidarlo
Jun 3 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might seem overly simplistic, but I have worked around this in the past with a simple momentary switch across the main toggle switch. Holding it in connects the two 12 V sources together while you flip the main. So at no point is the power interrupted. And with this the two sources are completely isolated during normal operation and cannot be accidentally left connected.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A lot of power may flow from the fully charged battery to the discharged battery when connected.
$endgroup$
– Ian Ringrose
Jun 4 at 9:02
$begingroup$
@IanRingrose That may or may not be a problem; in any case, it can mitigated with a resistor or such.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:22
$begingroup$
@George With the present setup, connecting the sources will not help much; the "break before make" switch will disconnect the load.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might seem overly simplistic, but I have worked around this in the past with a simple momentary switch across the main toggle switch. Holding it in connects the two 12 V sources together while you flip the main. So at no point is the power interrupted. And with this the two sources are completely isolated during normal operation and cannot be accidentally left connected.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A lot of power may flow from the fully charged battery to the discharged battery when connected.
$endgroup$
– Ian Ringrose
Jun 4 at 9:02
$begingroup$
@IanRingrose That may or may not be a problem; in any case, it can mitigated with a resistor or such.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:22
$begingroup$
@George With the present setup, connecting the sources will not help much; the "break before make" switch will disconnect the load.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might seem overly simplistic, but I have worked around this in the past with a simple momentary switch across the main toggle switch. Holding it in connects the two 12 V sources together while you flip the main. So at no point is the power interrupted. And with this the two sources are completely isolated during normal operation and cannot be accidentally left connected.
$endgroup$
This might seem overly simplistic, but I have worked around this in the past with a simple momentary switch across the main toggle switch. Holding it in connects the two 12 V sources together while you flip the main. So at no point is the power interrupted. And with this the two sources are completely isolated during normal operation and cannot be accidentally left connected.
edited Jun 3 at 10:49
Peter Mortensen
1,58931422
1,58931422
answered Jun 1 at 22:06
George RobertsonGeorge Robertson
1612
1612
$begingroup$
A lot of power may flow from the fully charged battery to the discharged battery when connected.
$endgroup$
– Ian Ringrose
Jun 4 at 9:02
$begingroup$
@IanRingrose That may or may not be a problem; in any case, it can mitigated with a resistor or such.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:22
$begingroup$
@George With the present setup, connecting the sources will not help much; the "break before make" switch will disconnect the load.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A lot of power may flow from the fully charged battery to the discharged battery when connected.
$endgroup$
– Ian Ringrose
Jun 4 at 9:02
$begingroup$
@IanRingrose That may or may not be a problem; in any case, it can mitigated with a resistor or such.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:22
$begingroup$
@George With the present setup, connecting the sources will not help much; the "break before make" switch will disconnect the load.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:23
$begingroup$
A lot of power may flow from the fully charged battery to the discharged battery when connected.
$endgroup$
– Ian Ringrose
Jun 4 at 9:02
$begingroup$
A lot of power may flow from the fully charged battery to the discharged battery when connected.
$endgroup$
– Ian Ringrose
Jun 4 at 9:02
$begingroup$
@IanRingrose That may or may not be a problem; in any case, it can mitigated with a resistor or such.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:22
$begingroup$
@IanRingrose That may or may not be a problem; in any case, it can mitigated with a resistor or such.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:22
$begingroup$
@George With the present setup, connecting the sources will not help much; the "break before make" switch will disconnect the load.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:23
$begingroup$
@George With the present setup, connecting the sources will not help much; the "break before make" switch will disconnect the load.
$endgroup$
– glglgl
Jun 4 at 9:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could check out the Texas instruments Power MUX range: link.
There are some 12V versions. I have a 5V one to switch LiPo batteries on a microprocessor but I do not think it reboots as it does not matter in my case.
They are not that expensive and you can get a evaluation module if you are not happy soldering small footprint components.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could check out the Texas instruments Power MUX range: link.
There are some 12V versions. I have a 5V one to switch LiPo batteries on a microprocessor but I do not think it reboots as it does not matter in my case.
They are not that expensive and you can get a evaluation module if you are not happy soldering small footprint components.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could check out the Texas instruments Power MUX range: link.
There are some 12V versions. I have a 5V one to switch LiPo batteries on a microprocessor but I do not think it reboots as it does not matter in my case.
They are not that expensive and you can get a evaluation module if you are not happy soldering small footprint components.
New contributor
$endgroup$
You could check out the Texas instruments Power MUX range: link.
There are some 12V versions. I have a 5V one to switch LiPo batteries on a microprocessor but I do not think it reboots as it does not matter in my case.
They are not that expensive and you can get a evaluation module if you are not happy soldering small footprint components.
New contributor
edited Jun 2 at 20:22
Daniel Tork
851831
851831
New contributor
answered Jun 2 at 12:12
BonzoBonzo
1311
1311
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get a SP3T switch with make-before-break contacts to connect each battery to the one end contact. And both batteries to the middle contact via a Schottky power diode.
That way there will be no "dead time" during the switchover.
Finding a suitable switch may be tricky.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks @Jansen - I'm aware of this option, but as you mentioned finding a suitable switch isn't easy, and is made harder in my case because space is tight and the switches have to be very small.
$endgroup$
– ConanTheGerbil
Jun 1 at 9:32
1
$begingroup$
RS has them available but you have to buy 500
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get a SP3T switch with make-before-break contacts to connect each battery to the one end contact. And both batteries to the middle contact via a Schottky power diode.
That way there will be no "dead time" during the switchover.
Finding a suitable switch may be tricky.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks @Jansen - I'm aware of this option, but as you mentioned finding a suitable switch isn't easy, and is made harder in my case because space is tight and the switches have to be very small.
$endgroup$
– ConanTheGerbil
Jun 1 at 9:32
1
$begingroup$
RS has them available but you have to buy 500
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get a SP3T switch with make-before-break contacts to connect each battery to the one end contact. And both batteries to the middle contact via a Schottky power diode.
That way there will be no "dead time" during the switchover.
Finding a suitable switch may be tricky.
$endgroup$
Get a SP3T switch with make-before-break contacts to connect each battery to the one end contact. And both batteries to the middle contact via a Schottky power diode.
That way there will be no "dead time" during the switchover.
Finding a suitable switch may be tricky.
edited Jun 3 at 8:10
Peter Mortensen
1,58931422
1,58931422
answered Jun 1 at 9:28
JasenJasen
12.8k11733
12.8k11733
$begingroup$
Thanks @Jansen - I'm aware of this option, but as you mentioned finding a suitable switch isn't easy, and is made harder in my case because space is tight and the switches have to be very small.
$endgroup$
– ConanTheGerbil
Jun 1 at 9:32
1
$begingroup$
RS has them available but you have to buy 500
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks @Jansen - I'm aware of this option, but as you mentioned finding a suitable switch isn't easy, and is made harder in my case because space is tight and the switches have to be very small.
$endgroup$
– ConanTheGerbil
Jun 1 at 9:32
1
$begingroup$
RS has them available but you have to buy 500
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:33
$begingroup$
Thanks @Jansen - I'm aware of this option, but as you mentioned finding a suitable switch isn't easy, and is made harder in my case because space is tight and the switches have to be very small.
$endgroup$
– ConanTheGerbil
Jun 1 at 9:32
$begingroup$
Thanks @Jansen - I'm aware of this option, but as you mentioned finding a suitable switch isn't easy, and is made harder in my case because space is tight and the switches have to be very small.
$endgroup$
– ConanTheGerbil
Jun 1 at 9:32
1
1
$begingroup$
RS has them available but you have to buy 500
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:33
$begingroup$
RS has them available but you have to buy 500
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you use two small switches make one break the other? Would it put too much strain on charger? It is a charger I assume? Or would it be too much strain on batteries due to different charge levels? Also, the original circuit diagram would help. This would assist a visual learner such as myself see the current configuration. Or switch it sooner before battery is so dead that it causes a drop. There is on market a smart switch made for automotive for deep cycle/starting battery combination. You mentioned little space so not sure it'll work for you.
There is a solution in someone's mind somewhere that will work perfectly.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Parts of this answer would work better as comments. Right this doesn’t directly answer the question, so is likely to be voted down. Worth remembering that Stack Exchange is not a discussion forum, it is a Q&A site.
$endgroup$
– David
Jun 2 at 21:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you use two small switches make one break the other? Would it put too much strain on charger? It is a charger I assume? Or would it be too much strain on batteries due to different charge levels? Also, the original circuit diagram would help. This would assist a visual learner such as myself see the current configuration. Or switch it sooner before battery is so dead that it causes a drop. There is on market a smart switch made for automotive for deep cycle/starting battery combination. You mentioned little space so not sure it'll work for you.
There is a solution in someone's mind somewhere that will work perfectly.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Parts of this answer would work better as comments. Right this doesn’t directly answer the question, so is likely to be voted down. Worth remembering that Stack Exchange is not a discussion forum, it is a Q&A site.
$endgroup$
– David
Jun 2 at 21:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you use two small switches make one break the other? Would it put too much strain on charger? It is a charger I assume? Or would it be too much strain on batteries due to different charge levels? Also, the original circuit diagram would help. This would assist a visual learner such as myself see the current configuration. Or switch it sooner before battery is so dead that it causes a drop. There is on market a smart switch made for automotive for deep cycle/starting battery combination. You mentioned little space so not sure it'll work for you.
There is a solution in someone's mind somewhere that will work perfectly.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Could you use two small switches make one break the other? Would it put too much strain on charger? It is a charger I assume? Or would it be too much strain on batteries due to different charge levels? Also, the original circuit diagram would help. This would assist a visual learner such as myself see the current configuration. Or switch it sooner before battery is so dead that it causes a drop. There is on market a smart switch made for automotive for deep cycle/starting battery combination. You mentioned little space so not sure it'll work for you.
There is a solution in someone's mind somewhere that will work perfectly.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Jun 2 at 6:53
AerogrudgeAerogrudge
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Parts of this answer would work better as comments. Right this doesn’t directly answer the question, so is likely to be voted down. Worth remembering that Stack Exchange is not a discussion forum, it is a Q&A site.
$endgroup$
– David
Jun 2 at 21:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Parts of this answer would work better as comments. Right this doesn’t directly answer the question, so is likely to be voted down. Worth remembering that Stack Exchange is not a discussion forum, it is a Q&A site.
$endgroup$
– David
Jun 2 at 21:32
$begingroup$
Parts of this answer would work better as comments. Right this doesn’t directly answer the question, so is likely to be voted down. Worth remembering that Stack Exchange is not a discussion forum, it is a Q&A site.
$endgroup$
– David
Jun 2 at 21:32
$begingroup$
Parts of this answer would work better as comments. Right this doesn’t directly answer the question, so is likely to be voted down. Worth remembering that Stack Exchange is not a discussion forum, it is a Q&A site.
$endgroup$
– David
Jun 2 at 21:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I use this device for pretty much exactly your problem:
http://www.mini-box.com/Y-PWR-Hot-Swap-Load-Sharing-Controller
I would assume it's easy for someone with experience in this area to duplicate if you'd rather roll your own.
Note: I have no affiliation with the site selling the above, and I'm not sure whether it's currently available being that there's no price listed, only "request quote". When I purchased it many years ago (probably nearly 10) it was inexpensive, though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I use this device for pretty much exactly your problem:
http://www.mini-box.com/Y-PWR-Hot-Swap-Load-Sharing-Controller
I would assume it's easy for someone with experience in this area to duplicate if you'd rather roll your own.
Note: I have no affiliation with the site selling the above, and I'm not sure whether it's currently available being that there's no price listed, only "request quote". When I purchased it many years ago (probably nearly 10) it was inexpensive, though.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I use this device for pretty much exactly your problem:
http://www.mini-box.com/Y-PWR-Hot-Swap-Load-Sharing-Controller
I would assume it's easy for someone with experience in this area to duplicate if you'd rather roll your own.
Note: I have no affiliation with the site selling the above, and I'm not sure whether it's currently available being that there's no price listed, only "request quote". When I purchased it many years ago (probably nearly 10) it was inexpensive, though.
$endgroup$
I use this device for pretty much exactly your problem:
http://www.mini-box.com/Y-PWR-Hot-Swap-Load-Sharing-Controller
I would assume it's easy for someone with experience in this area to duplicate if you'd rather roll your own.
Note: I have no affiliation with the site selling the above, and I'm not sure whether it's currently available being that there's no price listed, only "request quote". When I purchased it many years ago (probably nearly 10) it was inexpensive, though.
answered Jun 2 at 13:33
R..R..
62258
62258
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on the context, this can be a hard or even a very hard problem.
If the load does not tolerate any interruptions, you have to make it a 2-step process w/ 2 diodes and a special switch that passes thru a state when both sources are on.
(or even 4-step if you don't want a diode constantly eating a volt, rotary switch becomes your friend).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on the context, this can be a hard or even a very hard problem.
If the load does not tolerate any interruptions, you have to make it a 2-step process w/ 2 diodes and a special switch that passes thru a state when both sources are on.
(or even 4-step if you don't want a diode constantly eating a volt, rotary switch becomes your friend).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depending on the context, this can be a hard or even a very hard problem.
If the load does not tolerate any interruptions, you have to make it a 2-step process w/ 2 diodes and a special switch that passes thru a state when both sources are on.
(or even 4-step if you don't want a diode constantly eating a volt, rotary switch becomes your friend).
$endgroup$
Depending on the context, this can be a hard or even a very hard problem.
If the load does not tolerate any interruptions, you have to make it a 2-step process w/ 2 diodes and a special switch that passes thru a state when both sources are on.
(or even 4-step if you don't want a diode constantly eating a volt, rotary switch becomes your friend).
answered Jun 3 at 8:42
fraxinusfraxinus
293
293
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f441437%2fsmooth-switching-between-12-v-batteries-with-a-toggle-switch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
What dip in voltage is allowed in the transition period?
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
Jun 1 at 9:14
4
$begingroup$
a large-enough capacitor may damage your switch.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jun 1 at 9:23
6
$begingroup$
I doubt that. Switches take a hit on "break", particularly when it is inductive. And the cap will deal with that. The hit on "make" isn't nearly as bad, and better still since the voltage diff on make will be fairly small due to the cap.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Jun 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
Wouldn't two switches work? First you switch one of them, then the other.
$endgroup$
– data
Jun 3 at 8:56
5
$begingroup$
A capacitor behind a switch can end up causing brutal inrush current spikes after "make" .... which might not cause sparks, but resistance welding...
$endgroup$
– rackandboneman
Jun 3 at 10:35