Auto-manage planets button has no apparent effect

What is this welding tool I found in my attic?

Novel where a group of scientists in a spaceship encounter various aliens

definition of "percentile"

Professor falsely accusing me of cheating in a class he does not teach, two months after end of the class. What precautions should I take?

What's the LAG interface period be if the two switches have different periods set

Is there any word for "disobedience to God"?

Cops: The Hidden OEIS Substring

ESTA: "Is your travel to the US occurring in transit to another country?" when going on a cruise

Do you know your 'KVZ's?

Who has taken "my" Managed package namespace? Can we find out?

How can an advanced civilization forget how to manufacture its technology?

Setting MAC field to all-zero to indicate unencrypted data

Keep milk (or milk alternative) for a day without a fridge

Why do players in the past play much longer tournaments than today's top players?

If your plane is out-of-control, why does military training instruct releasing the joystick to neutralize controls?

Get ids only where one id is null and other isn't

Can I play a first turn Simic Growth Chamber to have 3 mana available in the second turn?

As the Dungeon Master, how do I handle a player that insists on a specific class when I already know that choice will cause issues?

What's the maximum time an interrupt service routine can take to execute on atmega328p?

The monorail explodes before I can get on it

Who Can Help Retag This?

Is Trump personally blocking people on Twitter?

CentOS 7 -> find: missing Argument for "-exec"

Why do people keep referring to Leia as Princess Leia, even after the destruction of Alderaan?



Auto-manage planets button has no apparent effect







.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6















Playing Stellaris in latest version 03/07/2019, I'm having an issue with the auto-manage planet button (the orange one):



autobuild



I click it but nothing happens.



What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districts, or maybe (ideally!) both.



But none of that happens. Nothing happens. And I'm not prevented from doing any of these things. So there's functionally no difference between the two modes. And I did set that sector's focus.



So what's happening? Is there an explanation, or did this button break in a recent patch?



I have almost all extensions except megacorporations. (base game + Ascension pack)










share|improve this question






























    6















    Playing Stellaris in latest version 03/07/2019, I'm having an issue with the auto-manage planet button (the orange one):



    autobuild



    I click it but nothing happens.



    What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districts, or maybe (ideally!) both.



    But none of that happens. Nothing happens. And I'm not prevented from doing any of these things. So there's functionally no difference between the two modes. And I did set that sector's focus.



    So what's happening? Is there an explanation, or did this button break in a recent patch?



    I have almost all extensions except megacorporations. (base game + Ascension pack)










    share|improve this question


























      6












      6








      6


      1






      Playing Stellaris in latest version 03/07/2019, I'm having an issue with the auto-manage planet button (the orange one):



      autobuild



      I click it but nothing happens.



      What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districts, or maybe (ideally!) both.



      But none of that happens. Nothing happens. And I'm not prevented from doing any of these things. So there's functionally no difference between the two modes. And I did set that sector's focus.



      So what's happening? Is there an explanation, or did this button break in a recent patch?



      I have almost all extensions except megacorporations. (base game + Ascension pack)










      share|improve this question
















      Playing Stellaris in latest version 03/07/2019, I'm having an issue with the auto-manage planet button (the orange one):



      autobuild



      I click it but nothing happens.



      What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districts, or maybe (ideally!) both.



      But none of that happens. Nothing happens. And I'm not prevented from doing any of these things. So there's functionally no difference between the two modes. And I did set that sector's focus.



      So what's happening? Is there an explanation, or did this button break in a recent patch?



      I have almost all extensions except megacorporations. (base game + Ascension pack)







      stellaris






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jul 3 at 19:13









      Chris Hayes

      3,96026 silver badges31 bronze badges




      3,96026 silver badges31 bronze badges










      asked Jul 3 at 9:53









      tatsutatsu

      2492 silver badges12 bronze badges




      2492 silver badges12 bronze badges




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          I'm going to assume that given the details of what you did look at, you did not look at the resource stockpile. Without resources, your automated sector is unable to perform build actions even if it wants to.



          When you create an automated sector, you need to either give them resources (minerals and energy) directly, or put it in the shared stockpile pool which all automated sectors have access to. Automated sectors will only take from the shared stockpile when they don't have a personal stockpile.



          The stockpiles can be accessed via the Planets & Sectors menu. The shared stockpile is at the top of the list, the sector-specific stockpiles are in the sector list.





          Clicking this button is a frustrating experience, it feels like you just hired someone to twiddle his thumbs.




          Welcome to government.




          What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districs (I just recently found out that there were also buildable districs, the UI hides this from us it's poor UI-design) or maybe (ideally!) both.




          This is what the sector automation actually does, once it has the resources to do so.




          Why not even auto-hire leaders if they die?




          Because you can't reasonably expect the AI to make the right trait decision for you. There's also other considerations such as the age of the applicants.




          Why not even auto-generate a sector and set it's mode when that becomes available?




          Because sectors that build sectors are liable to recursion issues. There are many non-trivial considerations here than a simple automation script cannot handle.



          How do you expect a sector to choose its own focus? Should it pick its focus based on what it can output the most of (modifiers etc)? Or should it pick its focus based on what your empire is lacking in?



          Whichever option you choose, any player who would prefer the other option would be endlessly annoyed by having the sectors make the wrong decision for themselves. Therefore, it's left up to the player to make key decisions that are much too complex for an algorithm to do in a way that everyone agrees with the decision logic.



          Also, sectors do mostly auto-generate since the latest update. A sector is defined by its first planet and automatically includes all other planets within 4 jumps from it.




          Also the button is just as effectively useless if the reason it does this is that it only takes effect after several years. There's an economy to be balanced and this is a matter that bears urgency.




          Usually, you shouldn't be automating sectors until you're at the point of having a stable economy. If you're still at the point where you need to keep a fine balance, the AI is never going to do an adequate job at that.



          Automation becomes practical when you no longer need to squeeze the blood from a stone and are just hoping to lessen the workload (by not having to click it all yourself) at the cost of some efficiency (the AI is never perfect).






          share|improve this answer























          • thanks! again, ressource stockpile, is one of those things that is poorly communicated by the UI and that the tutorial AI doesn't teach you. I'm glad districs and building CAN auto build under the right circumstaces. As for the rest of the less optimal things I'd have hoped automation would do : my assumption is that if you're clicking on such a button you're fine with the things being a matter of human preferance & appreciation being randomised. If it were to automatically hire leaders, a random choice would be wha tI would expect from it. as for sector focus I always saw them as ordered.

            – tatsu
            Jul 3 at 14:17












          • About automation becoming practical - have you had a good experience with this? The only active AI behavior I've seen is building a single district or building to avoid complete homelessness or lack of amenities.

            – 5AM
            Jul 3 at 17:05






          • 1





            @5AM: The general online consensus is that the AI is bad. While I agree it's not particularly stellar, I don't have that much issues with it either. Maybe because I don't play at a high enough level for it to matter (third from the bottom, I think Captain?), maybe because I understand (as a software dev) why the AI is limited and I don't expect expert decisions from it.

            – Flater
            Jul 4 at 6:16






          • 1





            Alright, I only ask since OP mentions not having the megacorp DLC (I don't either) and that could explain why your experience with auto-manage was different. One thing to note is that the AI for managing sectors & planets was actually quite good before the 2.2 update that overhauled planet-building.

            – 5AM
            Jul 5 at 12:37











          • @5AM: I've been a fairly faithful Stellaris subreddit lurker and I can tell you with absolute certainty that the complaints about the AI have been constant since Stellaris' release. Yes, it did spike around Le Guin, because a new system brings new bugs, but that applies to pretty much any newly updated (or newly release) feature.

            – Flater
            Jul 5 at 12:47













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "41"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f353828%2fauto-manage-planets-button-has-no-apparent-effect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8














          I'm going to assume that given the details of what you did look at, you did not look at the resource stockpile. Without resources, your automated sector is unable to perform build actions even if it wants to.



          When you create an automated sector, you need to either give them resources (minerals and energy) directly, or put it in the shared stockpile pool which all automated sectors have access to. Automated sectors will only take from the shared stockpile when they don't have a personal stockpile.



          The stockpiles can be accessed via the Planets & Sectors menu. The shared stockpile is at the top of the list, the sector-specific stockpiles are in the sector list.





          Clicking this button is a frustrating experience, it feels like you just hired someone to twiddle his thumbs.




          Welcome to government.




          What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districs (I just recently found out that there were also buildable districs, the UI hides this from us it's poor UI-design) or maybe (ideally!) both.




          This is what the sector automation actually does, once it has the resources to do so.




          Why not even auto-hire leaders if they die?




          Because you can't reasonably expect the AI to make the right trait decision for you. There's also other considerations such as the age of the applicants.




          Why not even auto-generate a sector and set it's mode when that becomes available?




          Because sectors that build sectors are liable to recursion issues. There are many non-trivial considerations here than a simple automation script cannot handle.



          How do you expect a sector to choose its own focus? Should it pick its focus based on what it can output the most of (modifiers etc)? Or should it pick its focus based on what your empire is lacking in?



          Whichever option you choose, any player who would prefer the other option would be endlessly annoyed by having the sectors make the wrong decision for themselves. Therefore, it's left up to the player to make key decisions that are much too complex for an algorithm to do in a way that everyone agrees with the decision logic.



          Also, sectors do mostly auto-generate since the latest update. A sector is defined by its first planet and automatically includes all other planets within 4 jumps from it.




          Also the button is just as effectively useless if the reason it does this is that it only takes effect after several years. There's an economy to be balanced and this is a matter that bears urgency.




          Usually, you shouldn't be automating sectors until you're at the point of having a stable economy. If you're still at the point where you need to keep a fine balance, the AI is never going to do an adequate job at that.



          Automation becomes practical when you no longer need to squeeze the blood from a stone and are just hoping to lessen the workload (by not having to click it all yourself) at the cost of some efficiency (the AI is never perfect).






          share|improve this answer























          • thanks! again, ressource stockpile, is one of those things that is poorly communicated by the UI and that the tutorial AI doesn't teach you. I'm glad districs and building CAN auto build under the right circumstaces. As for the rest of the less optimal things I'd have hoped automation would do : my assumption is that if you're clicking on such a button you're fine with the things being a matter of human preferance & appreciation being randomised. If it were to automatically hire leaders, a random choice would be wha tI would expect from it. as for sector focus I always saw them as ordered.

            – tatsu
            Jul 3 at 14:17












          • About automation becoming practical - have you had a good experience with this? The only active AI behavior I've seen is building a single district or building to avoid complete homelessness or lack of amenities.

            – 5AM
            Jul 3 at 17:05






          • 1





            @5AM: The general online consensus is that the AI is bad. While I agree it's not particularly stellar, I don't have that much issues with it either. Maybe because I don't play at a high enough level for it to matter (third from the bottom, I think Captain?), maybe because I understand (as a software dev) why the AI is limited and I don't expect expert decisions from it.

            – Flater
            Jul 4 at 6:16






          • 1





            Alright, I only ask since OP mentions not having the megacorp DLC (I don't either) and that could explain why your experience with auto-manage was different. One thing to note is that the AI for managing sectors & planets was actually quite good before the 2.2 update that overhauled planet-building.

            – 5AM
            Jul 5 at 12:37











          • @5AM: I've been a fairly faithful Stellaris subreddit lurker and I can tell you with absolute certainty that the complaints about the AI have been constant since Stellaris' release. Yes, it did spike around Le Guin, because a new system brings new bugs, but that applies to pretty much any newly updated (or newly release) feature.

            – Flater
            Jul 5 at 12:47















          8














          I'm going to assume that given the details of what you did look at, you did not look at the resource stockpile. Without resources, your automated sector is unable to perform build actions even if it wants to.



          When you create an automated sector, you need to either give them resources (minerals and energy) directly, or put it in the shared stockpile pool which all automated sectors have access to. Automated sectors will only take from the shared stockpile when they don't have a personal stockpile.



          The stockpiles can be accessed via the Planets & Sectors menu. The shared stockpile is at the top of the list, the sector-specific stockpiles are in the sector list.





          Clicking this button is a frustrating experience, it feels like you just hired someone to twiddle his thumbs.




          Welcome to government.




          What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districs (I just recently found out that there were also buildable districs, the UI hides this from us it's poor UI-design) or maybe (ideally!) both.




          This is what the sector automation actually does, once it has the resources to do so.




          Why not even auto-hire leaders if they die?




          Because you can't reasonably expect the AI to make the right trait decision for you. There's also other considerations such as the age of the applicants.




          Why not even auto-generate a sector and set it's mode when that becomes available?




          Because sectors that build sectors are liable to recursion issues. There are many non-trivial considerations here than a simple automation script cannot handle.



          How do you expect a sector to choose its own focus? Should it pick its focus based on what it can output the most of (modifiers etc)? Or should it pick its focus based on what your empire is lacking in?



          Whichever option you choose, any player who would prefer the other option would be endlessly annoyed by having the sectors make the wrong decision for themselves. Therefore, it's left up to the player to make key decisions that are much too complex for an algorithm to do in a way that everyone agrees with the decision logic.



          Also, sectors do mostly auto-generate since the latest update. A sector is defined by its first planet and automatically includes all other planets within 4 jumps from it.




          Also the button is just as effectively useless if the reason it does this is that it only takes effect after several years. There's an economy to be balanced and this is a matter that bears urgency.




          Usually, you shouldn't be automating sectors until you're at the point of having a stable economy. If you're still at the point where you need to keep a fine balance, the AI is never going to do an adequate job at that.



          Automation becomes practical when you no longer need to squeeze the blood from a stone and are just hoping to lessen the workload (by not having to click it all yourself) at the cost of some efficiency (the AI is never perfect).






          share|improve this answer























          • thanks! again, ressource stockpile, is one of those things that is poorly communicated by the UI and that the tutorial AI doesn't teach you. I'm glad districs and building CAN auto build under the right circumstaces. As for the rest of the less optimal things I'd have hoped automation would do : my assumption is that if you're clicking on such a button you're fine with the things being a matter of human preferance & appreciation being randomised. If it were to automatically hire leaders, a random choice would be wha tI would expect from it. as for sector focus I always saw them as ordered.

            – tatsu
            Jul 3 at 14:17












          • About automation becoming practical - have you had a good experience with this? The only active AI behavior I've seen is building a single district or building to avoid complete homelessness or lack of amenities.

            – 5AM
            Jul 3 at 17:05






          • 1





            @5AM: The general online consensus is that the AI is bad. While I agree it's not particularly stellar, I don't have that much issues with it either. Maybe because I don't play at a high enough level for it to matter (third from the bottom, I think Captain?), maybe because I understand (as a software dev) why the AI is limited and I don't expect expert decisions from it.

            – Flater
            Jul 4 at 6:16






          • 1





            Alright, I only ask since OP mentions not having the megacorp DLC (I don't either) and that could explain why your experience with auto-manage was different. One thing to note is that the AI for managing sectors & planets was actually quite good before the 2.2 update that overhauled planet-building.

            – 5AM
            Jul 5 at 12:37











          • @5AM: I've been a fairly faithful Stellaris subreddit lurker and I can tell you with absolute certainty that the complaints about the AI have been constant since Stellaris' release. Yes, it did spike around Le Guin, because a new system brings new bugs, but that applies to pretty much any newly updated (or newly release) feature.

            – Flater
            Jul 5 at 12:47













          8












          8








          8







          I'm going to assume that given the details of what you did look at, you did not look at the resource stockpile. Without resources, your automated sector is unable to perform build actions even if it wants to.



          When you create an automated sector, you need to either give them resources (minerals and energy) directly, or put it in the shared stockpile pool which all automated sectors have access to. Automated sectors will only take from the shared stockpile when they don't have a personal stockpile.



          The stockpiles can be accessed via the Planets & Sectors menu. The shared stockpile is at the top of the list, the sector-specific stockpiles are in the sector list.





          Clicking this button is a frustrating experience, it feels like you just hired someone to twiddle his thumbs.




          Welcome to government.




          What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districs (I just recently found out that there were also buildable districs, the UI hides this from us it's poor UI-design) or maybe (ideally!) both.




          This is what the sector automation actually does, once it has the resources to do so.




          Why not even auto-hire leaders if they die?




          Because you can't reasonably expect the AI to make the right trait decision for you. There's also other considerations such as the age of the applicants.




          Why not even auto-generate a sector and set it's mode when that becomes available?




          Because sectors that build sectors are liable to recursion issues. There are many non-trivial considerations here than a simple automation script cannot handle.



          How do you expect a sector to choose its own focus? Should it pick its focus based on what it can output the most of (modifiers etc)? Or should it pick its focus based on what your empire is lacking in?



          Whichever option you choose, any player who would prefer the other option would be endlessly annoyed by having the sectors make the wrong decision for themselves. Therefore, it's left up to the player to make key decisions that are much too complex for an algorithm to do in a way that everyone agrees with the decision logic.



          Also, sectors do mostly auto-generate since the latest update. A sector is defined by its first planet and automatically includes all other planets within 4 jumps from it.




          Also the button is just as effectively useless if the reason it does this is that it only takes effect after several years. There's an economy to be balanced and this is a matter that bears urgency.




          Usually, you shouldn't be automating sectors until you're at the point of having a stable economy. If you're still at the point where you need to keep a fine balance, the AI is never going to do an adequate job at that.



          Automation becomes practical when you no longer need to squeeze the blood from a stone and are just hoping to lessen the workload (by not having to click it all yourself) at the cost of some efficiency (the AI is never perfect).






          share|improve this answer













          I'm going to assume that given the details of what you did look at, you did not look at the resource stockpile. Without resources, your automated sector is unable to perform build actions even if it wants to.



          When you create an automated sector, you need to either give them resources (minerals and energy) directly, or put it in the shared stockpile pool which all automated sectors have access to. Automated sectors will only take from the shared stockpile when they don't have a personal stockpile.



          The stockpiles can be accessed via the Planets & Sectors menu. The shared stockpile is at the top of the list, the sector-specific stockpiles are in the sector list.





          Clicking this button is a frustrating experience, it feels like you just hired someone to twiddle his thumbs.




          Welcome to government.




          What I imagine should happen is it should start building/replacing buildings or maybe the same for districs (I just recently found out that there were also buildable districs, the UI hides this from us it's poor UI-design) or maybe (ideally!) both.




          This is what the sector automation actually does, once it has the resources to do so.




          Why not even auto-hire leaders if they die?




          Because you can't reasonably expect the AI to make the right trait decision for you. There's also other considerations such as the age of the applicants.




          Why not even auto-generate a sector and set it's mode when that becomes available?




          Because sectors that build sectors are liable to recursion issues. There are many non-trivial considerations here than a simple automation script cannot handle.



          How do you expect a sector to choose its own focus? Should it pick its focus based on what it can output the most of (modifiers etc)? Or should it pick its focus based on what your empire is lacking in?



          Whichever option you choose, any player who would prefer the other option would be endlessly annoyed by having the sectors make the wrong decision for themselves. Therefore, it's left up to the player to make key decisions that are much too complex for an algorithm to do in a way that everyone agrees with the decision logic.



          Also, sectors do mostly auto-generate since the latest update. A sector is defined by its first planet and automatically includes all other planets within 4 jumps from it.




          Also the button is just as effectively useless if the reason it does this is that it only takes effect after several years. There's an economy to be balanced and this is a matter that bears urgency.




          Usually, you shouldn't be automating sectors until you're at the point of having a stable economy. If you're still at the point where you need to keep a fine balance, the AI is never going to do an adequate job at that.



          Automation becomes practical when you no longer need to squeeze the blood from a stone and are just hoping to lessen the workload (by not having to click it all yourself) at the cost of some efficiency (the AI is never perfect).







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jul 3 at 14:09









          FlaterFlater

          3,92215 silver badges25 bronze badges




          3,92215 silver badges25 bronze badges












          • thanks! again, ressource stockpile, is one of those things that is poorly communicated by the UI and that the tutorial AI doesn't teach you. I'm glad districs and building CAN auto build under the right circumstaces. As for the rest of the less optimal things I'd have hoped automation would do : my assumption is that if you're clicking on such a button you're fine with the things being a matter of human preferance & appreciation being randomised. If it were to automatically hire leaders, a random choice would be wha tI would expect from it. as for sector focus I always saw them as ordered.

            – tatsu
            Jul 3 at 14:17












          • About automation becoming practical - have you had a good experience with this? The only active AI behavior I've seen is building a single district or building to avoid complete homelessness or lack of amenities.

            – 5AM
            Jul 3 at 17:05






          • 1





            @5AM: The general online consensus is that the AI is bad. While I agree it's not particularly stellar, I don't have that much issues with it either. Maybe because I don't play at a high enough level for it to matter (third from the bottom, I think Captain?), maybe because I understand (as a software dev) why the AI is limited and I don't expect expert decisions from it.

            – Flater
            Jul 4 at 6:16






          • 1





            Alright, I only ask since OP mentions not having the megacorp DLC (I don't either) and that could explain why your experience with auto-manage was different. One thing to note is that the AI for managing sectors & planets was actually quite good before the 2.2 update that overhauled planet-building.

            – 5AM
            Jul 5 at 12:37











          • @5AM: I've been a fairly faithful Stellaris subreddit lurker and I can tell you with absolute certainty that the complaints about the AI have been constant since Stellaris' release. Yes, it did spike around Le Guin, because a new system brings new bugs, but that applies to pretty much any newly updated (or newly release) feature.

            – Flater
            Jul 5 at 12:47

















          • thanks! again, ressource stockpile, is one of those things that is poorly communicated by the UI and that the tutorial AI doesn't teach you. I'm glad districs and building CAN auto build under the right circumstaces. As for the rest of the less optimal things I'd have hoped automation would do : my assumption is that if you're clicking on such a button you're fine with the things being a matter of human preferance & appreciation being randomised. If it were to automatically hire leaders, a random choice would be wha tI would expect from it. as for sector focus I always saw them as ordered.

            – tatsu
            Jul 3 at 14:17












          • About automation becoming practical - have you had a good experience with this? The only active AI behavior I've seen is building a single district or building to avoid complete homelessness or lack of amenities.

            – 5AM
            Jul 3 at 17:05






          • 1





            @5AM: The general online consensus is that the AI is bad. While I agree it's not particularly stellar, I don't have that much issues with it either. Maybe because I don't play at a high enough level for it to matter (third from the bottom, I think Captain?), maybe because I understand (as a software dev) why the AI is limited and I don't expect expert decisions from it.

            – Flater
            Jul 4 at 6:16






          • 1





            Alright, I only ask since OP mentions not having the megacorp DLC (I don't either) and that could explain why your experience with auto-manage was different. One thing to note is that the AI for managing sectors & planets was actually quite good before the 2.2 update that overhauled planet-building.

            – 5AM
            Jul 5 at 12:37











          • @5AM: I've been a fairly faithful Stellaris subreddit lurker and I can tell you with absolute certainty that the complaints about the AI have been constant since Stellaris' release. Yes, it did spike around Le Guin, because a new system brings new bugs, but that applies to pretty much any newly updated (or newly release) feature.

            – Flater
            Jul 5 at 12:47
















          thanks! again, ressource stockpile, is one of those things that is poorly communicated by the UI and that the tutorial AI doesn't teach you. I'm glad districs and building CAN auto build under the right circumstaces. As for the rest of the less optimal things I'd have hoped automation would do : my assumption is that if you're clicking on such a button you're fine with the things being a matter of human preferance & appreciation being randomised. If it were to automatically hire leaders, a random choice would be wha tI would expect from it. as for sector focus I always saw them as ordered.

          – tatsu
          Jul 3 at 14:17






          thanks! again, ressource stockpile, is one of those things that is poorly communicated by the UI and that the tutorial AI doesn't teach you. I'm glad districs and building CAN auto build under the right circumstaces. As for the rest of the less optimal things I'd have hoped automation would do : my assumption is that if you're clicking on such a button you're fine with the things being a matter of human preferance & appreciation being randomised. If it were to automatically hire leaders, a random choice would be wha tI would expect from it. as for sector focus I always saw them as ordered.

          – tatsu
          Jul 3 at 14:17














          About automation becoming practical - have you had a good experience with this? The only active AI behavior I've seen is building a single district or building to avoid complete homelessness or lack of amenities.

          – 5AM
          Jul 3 at 17:05





          About automation becoming practical - have you had a good experience with this? The only active AI behavior I've seen is building a single district or building to avoid complete homelessness or lack of amenities.

          – 5AM
          Jul 3 at 17:05




          1




          1





          @5AM: The general online consensus is that the AI is bad. While I agree it's not particularly stellar, I don't have that much issues with it either. Maybe because I don't play at a high enough level for it to matter (third from the bottom, I think Captain?), maybe because I understand (as a software dev) why the AI is limited and I don't expect expert decisions from it.

          – Flater
          Jul 4 at 6:16





          @5AM: The general online consensus is that the AI is bad. While I agree it's not particularly stellar, I don't have that much issues with it either. Maybe because I don't play at a high enough level for it to matter (third from the bottom, I think Captain?), maybe because I understand (as a software dev) why the AI is limited and I don't expect expert decisions from it.

          – Flater
          Jul 4 at 6:16




          1




          1





          Alright, I only ask since OP mentions not having the megacorp DLC (I don't either) and that could explain why your experience with auto-manage was different. One thing to note is that the AI for managing sectors & planets was actually quite good before the 2.2 update that overhauled planet-building.

          – 5AM
          Jul 5 at 12:37





          Alright, I only ask since OP mentions not having the megacorp DLC (I don't either) and that could explain why your experience with auto-manage was different. One thing to note is that the AI for managing sectors & planets was actually quite good before the 2.2 update that overhauled planet-building.

          – 5AM
          Jul 5 at 12:37













          @5AM: I've been a fairly faithful Stellaris subreddit lurker and I can tell you with absolute certainty that the complaints about the AI have been constant since Stellaris' release. Yes, it did spike around Le Guin, because a new system brings new bugs, but that applies to pretty much any newly updated (or newly release) feature.

          – Flater
          Jul 5 at 12:47





          @5AM: I've been a fairly faithful Stellaris subreddit lurker and I can tell you with absolute certainty that the complaints about the AI have been constant since Stellaris' release. Yes, it did spike around Le Guin, because a new system brings new bugs, but that applies to pretty much any newly updated (or newly release) feature.

          – Flater
          Jul 5 at 12:47

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Arqade!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f353828%2fauto-manage-planets-button-has-no-apparent-effect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

          Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

          Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?