How “hard” did Apollo 12 turn left just before it landed?How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?What was the procedure for Lunar Orbit Rendezvous?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Why did the Apollo program become a MULTIPLE human landing program?How did Apollo-12 manage to land next to Surveyor-3? First “Space-Tourists”?What was learned from study of Surveyor-3's components, retrieved and returned to Earth by Apollo-12?How exactly did the floor of an Apollo LM look like after EVA(s)? Seeking photo!How do we know the Apollo Moon landings are real?How different was the Apollo LM descent trajectory from the most fuel-efficient?How close did Apollo 16 astronaut Charles M. Duke Jr. get to the edge of Plum crater?How did sloshing prevent the Apollo Service Module from moving safely away from the Command Module and how was this fixed?How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?

Getting an entry level IT position later in life

What is the purpose of this mount on the upper suspension arm?

Unexpected route on a flight from USA to Europe

What could prevent players from leaving an island?

How do these cubesats' whip antennas work?

Does the Voyager team use a wrapper (Fortran(77?) to Python) to transmit current commands?

What city skyline is this picture of?

What word best describes someone who likes to do everything on his own?

Do any languages mention the top limit of a range first?

Does a jail-cell need a mezuzah?

How to realistically deal with a shield user?

Are children a reason to be rejected for a job?

Will a paper be retracted if a flaw in released software code invalidates its central idea?

Best way to explain to my boss that I cannot attend a team summit because it is on Rosh Hashana or any other Jewish Holiday

12V lead acid charger with LM317 not charging

Does a 4 bladed prop have almost twice the thrust of a 2 bladed prop?

Why is Chromosome 1 called Chromosome 1?

Is DC heating faster than AC heating?

How would a family travel from Indiana to Texas in 1911?

ESTA declined to the US

How to halve redstone signal strength?

Is there a drawback to Flail Snail's Shell defense?

Why does putting a dot after the URL remove login information?

Print only the last three columns from file



How “hard” did Apollo 12 turn left just before it landed?


How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?What was the procedure for Lunar Orbit Rendezvous?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Why did the Apollo program become a MULTIPLE human landing program?How did Apollo-12 manage to land next to Surveyor-3? First “Space-Tourists”?What was learned from study of Surveyor-3's components, retrieved and returned to Earth by Apollo-12?How exactly did the floor of an Apollo LM look like after EVA(s)? Seeking photo!How do we know the Apollo Moon landings are real?How different was the Apollo LM descent trajectory from the most fuel-efficient?How close did Apollo 16 astronaut Charles M. Duke Jr. get to the edge of Plum crater?How did sloshing prevent the Apollo Service Module from moving safely away from the Command Module and how was this fixed?How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


This answer to How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points? includes Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846



It shows the Apollo 12 LM making what could be loosely termed a "hard left" just before landing.



The Apollo 11 landing has popular fame for "waiting to exhale land" while continuing to move forward, but for this question I'm asking about lateral maneuvers.



  1. Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this?

  2. Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)

  3. how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point? Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to vector the thrust laterally?

  4. ("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?


Cropped screen shot of Figure 34 from source found in this answer:



Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Jul 28 at 2:00











  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 2:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Jul 28 at 2:02

















4












$begingroup$


This answer to How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points? includes Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846



It shows the Apollo 12 LM making what could be loosely termed a "hard left" just before landing.



The Apollo 11 landing has popular fame for "waiting to exhale land" while continuing to move forward, but for this question I'm asking about lateral maneuvers.



  1. Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this?

  2. Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)

  3. how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point? Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to vector the thrust laterally?

  4. ("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?


Cropped screen shot of Figure 34 from source found in this answer:



Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Jul 28 at 2:00











  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 2:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Jul 28 at 2:02













4












4








4





$begingroup$


This answer to How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points? includes Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846



It shows the Apollo 12 LM making what could be loosely termed a "hard left" just before landing.



The Apollo 11 landing has popular fame for "waiting to exhale land" while continuing to move forward, but for this question I'm asking about lateral maneuvers.



  1. Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this?

  2. Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)

  3. how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point? Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to vector the thrust laterally?

  4. ("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?


Cropped screen shot of Figure 34 from source found in this answer:



Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




This answer to How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points? includes Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846



It shows the Apollo 12 LM making what could be loosely termed a "hard left" just before landing.



The Apollo 11 landing has popular fame for "waiting to exhale land" while continuing to move forward, but for this question I'm asking about lateral maneuvers.



  1. Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this?

  2. Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)

  3. how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point? Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to vector the thrust laterally?

  4. ("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?


Cropped screen shot of Figure 34 from source found in this answer:



Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846







apollo-program history lunar-landing adcs apollo-12






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 27 at 23:50







uhoh

















asked Jul 27 at 23:27









uhohuhoh

49k22 gold badges196 silver badges635 bronze badges




49k22 gold badges196 silver badges635 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Jul 28 at 2:00











  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 2:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Jul 28 at 2:02












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Jul 28 at 2:00











  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 2:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Jul 28 at 2:02







2




2




$begingroup$
No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:00





$begingroup$
No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:00













$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 2:01




$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 2:01




1




1




$begingroup$
Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:02




$begingroup$
Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:02










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.



The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:




[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]




That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.




[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]




In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.




110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.



110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]




So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.




Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)




As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.



I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.




("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?




"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.



"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.



Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.



It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.




how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?




It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.




Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?




I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 6:51













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37734%2fhow-hard-did-apollo-12-turn-left-just-before-it-landed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.



The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:




[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]




That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.




[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]




In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.




110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.



110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]




So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.




Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)




As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.



I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.




("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?




"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.



"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.



Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.



It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.




how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?




It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.




Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?




I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 6:51















8












$begingroup$

Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.



The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:




[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]




That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.




[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]




In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.




110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.



110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]




So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.




Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)




As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.



I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.




("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?




"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.



"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.



Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.



It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.




how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?




It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.




Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?




I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 6:51













8












8








8





$begingroup$

Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.



The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:




[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]




That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.




[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]




In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.




110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.



110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]




So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.




Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)




As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.



I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.




("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?




"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.



"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.



Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.



It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.




how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?




It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.




Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?




I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.



The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:




[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]




That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.




[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]




In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.




110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.



110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.



[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]




So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.




Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)




As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.



I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.




("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?




"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.



"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.



Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.



It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.




how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?




It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.




Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?




I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jul 28 at 3:59

























answered Jul 28 at 2:35









Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove

101k3 gold badges354 silver badges439 bronze badges




101k3 gold badges354 silver badges439 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 6:51
















  • $begingroup$
    Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jul 28 at 6:51















$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51




$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37734%2fhow-hard-did-apollo-12-turn-left-just-before-it-landed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?