How “hard” did Apollo 12 turn left just before it landed?How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?What was the procedure for Lunar Orbit Rendezvous?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Why did the Apollo program become a MULTIPLE human landing program?How did Apollo-12 manage to land next to Surveyor-3? First “Space-Tourists”?What was learned from study of Surveyor-3's components, retrieved and returned to Earth by Apollo-12?How exactly did the floor of an Apollo LM look like after EVA(s)? Seeking photo!How do we know the Apollo Moon landings are real?How different was the Apollo LM descent trajectory from the most fuel-efficient?How close did Apollo 16 astronaut Charles M. Duke Jr. get to the edge of Plum crater?How did sloshing prevent the Apollo Service Module from moving safely away from the Command Module and how was this fixed?How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?
Getting an entry level IT position later in life
What is the purpose of this mount on the upper suspension arm?
Unexpected route on a flight from USA to Europe
What could prevent players from leaving an island?
How do these cubesats' whip antennas work?
Does the Voyager team use a wrapper (Fortran(77?) to Python) to transmit current commands?
What city skyline is this picture of?
What word best describes someone who likes to do everything on his own?
Do any languages mention the top limit of a range first?
Does a jail-cell need a mezuzah?
How to realistically deal with a shield user?
Are children a reason to be rejected for a job?
Will a paper be retracted if a flaw in released software code invalidates its central idea?
Best way to explain to my boss that I cannot attend a team summit because it is on Rosh Hashana or any other Jewish Holiday
12V lead acid charger with LM317 not charging
Does a 4 bladed prop have almost twice the thrust of a 2 bladed prop?
Why is Chromosome 1 called Chromosome 1?
Is DC heating faster than AC heating?
How would a family travel from Indiana to Texas in 1911?
ESTA declined to the US
How to halve redstone signal strength?
Is there a drawback to Flail Snail's Shell defense?
Why does putting a dot after the URL remove login information?
Print only the last three columns from file
How “hard” did Apollo 12 turn left just before it landed?
How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?What was the procedure for Lunar Orbit Rendezvous?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Why did the Apollo program become a MULTIPLE human landing program?How did Apollo-12 manage to land next to Surveyor-3? First “Space-Tourists”?What was learned from study of Surveyor-3's components, retrieved and returned to Earth by Apollo-12?How exactly did the floor of an Apollo LM look like after EVA(s)? Seeking photo!How do we know the Apollo Moon landings are real?How different was the Apollo LM descent trajectory from the most fuel-efficient?How close did Apollo 16 astronaut Charles M. Duke Jr. get to the edge of Plum crater?How did sloshing prevent the Apollo Service Module from moving safely away from the Command Module and how was this fixed?How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
This answer to How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points? includes Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846
It shows the Apollo 12 LM making what could be loosely termed a "hard left" just before landing.
The Apollo 11 landing has popular fame for "waiting to exhale land" while continuing to move forward, but for this question I'm asking about lateral maneuvers.
- Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this?
- Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
- how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point? Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to vector the thrust laterally?
- ("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
Cropped screen shot of Figure 34 from source found in this answer:
apollo-program history lunar-landing adcs apollo-12
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This answer to How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points? includes Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846
It shows the Apollo 12 LM making what could be loosely termed a "hard left" just before landing.
The Apollo 11 landing has popular fame for "waiting to exhale land" while continuing to move forward, but for this question I'm asking about lateral maneuvers.
- Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this?
- Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
- how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point? Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to vector the thrust laterally?
- ("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
Cropped screen shot of Figure 34 from source found in this answer:
apollo-program history lunar-landing adcs apollo-12
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:00
$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 2:01
1
$begingroup$
Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This answer to How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points? includes Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846
It shows the Apollo 12 LM making what could be loosely termed a "hard left" just before landing.
The Apollo 11 landing has popular fame for "waiting to exhale land" while continuing to move forward, but for this question I'm asking about lateral maneuvers.
- Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this?
- Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
- how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point? Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to vector the thrust laterally?
- ("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
Cropped screen shot of Figure 34 from source found in this answer:
apollo-program history lunar-landing adcs apollo-12
$endgroup$
This answer to How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points? includes Figure 34 from Floyd Bennett's 1972 Apollo Experience Report - Mission Planning for Lunar Descent and Ascent; NASA TN D-6846
It shows the Apollo 12 LM making what could be loosely termed a "hard left" just before landing.
The Apollo 11 landing has popular fame for "waiting to exhale land" while continuing to move forward, but for this question I'm asking about lateral maneuvers.
- Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this?
- Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
- how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point? Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to vector the thrust laterally?
- ("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
Cropped screen shot of Figure 34 from source found in this answer:
apollo-program history lunar-landing adcs apollo-12
apollo-program history lunar-landing adcs apollo-12
edited Jul 27 at 23:50
uhoh
asked Jul 27 at 23:27
uhohuhoh
49k22 gold badges196 silver badges635 bronze badges
49k22 gold badges196 silver badges635 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:00
$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 2:01
1
$begingroup$
Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:02
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:00
$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 2:01
1
$begingroup$
Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:02
2
2
$begingroup$
No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:00
$begingroup$
No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:00
$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 2:01
$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 2:01
1
1
$begingroup$
Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:02
$begingroup$
Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:02
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.
The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:
[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]
That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.
[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]
In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.
110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.
110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]
So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.
Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.
I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.
("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.
"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.
Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.
It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.
how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?
It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.
Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?
I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37734%2fhow-hard-did-apollo-12-turn-left-just-before-it-landed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.
The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:
[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]
That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.
[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]
In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.
110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.
110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]
So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.
Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.
I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.
("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.
"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.
Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.
It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.
how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?
It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.
Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?
I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.
The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:
[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]
That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.
[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]
In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.
110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.
110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]
So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.
Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.
I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.
("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.
"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.
Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.
It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.
how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?
It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.
Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?
I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.
The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:
[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]
That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.
[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]
In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.
110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.
110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]
So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.
Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.
I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.
("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.
"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.
Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.
It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.
how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?
It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.
Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?
I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.
$endgroup$
Without any time markings, it's impossible to tell if the ground track indicates a "hard left" or very gentle maneuvers over a long period of time.
The annotated transcript gives us some hints, though:
[Pete is descending very slowly as he flies along the north rim of Surveyor Crater, looking for a good spot to land.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "At that point, Al got a little nervous because I had killed the rate of descent to 3 feet a second at 500 feet. I left a very high pitch angle on it, on the order of 30 degrees, because we were moving quite fast and I wanted to get stopped."]
That is, Conrad tilted the LM backwards 30 degrees, to point the engine forward to brake forward speed.
[Pete has the spacecraft pitched so that the engine is pointed partly forward to slow their approach to the landing site.]
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had the horizontal velocity under control about the time I passed the near (eastern) edge of the Surveyor crater (at about 110:31:00). I saw a suitable landing area between the Surveyor crater and Head Crater, which meant I had to maneuver to my left and sort of fly around the side of the crater, which I started to do. I guess I wheeled her around it pretty hard, because Al commented a couple of times that I was really cranking her around; and I told him it was no problem."]
In the transcript, I only see instance of Bean commenting on the maneuvering, and it’s before this point.
110:31:23 Bean: Ten percent fuel. 200 feet; coming down at 3. (You) need to come on down.
110:31:29 Conrad: Okay.
[Conrad, from the 1969 Technical Debrief - "I had everything under control, and I did increase the rate of descent after he called my attention to that fact that we had leveled off quite high, at 500 feet (actually about 200). I got down as soon as I got over the area that I wanted to land on. To me, it looked like a perfectly smooth, good area, between Head Crater and Surveyor Crater, and I started a vertical descent from a relatively high altitude, 300 feet at least. It may turn out that I actually backed up a little bit (that is, move backwards during the descent); but I don't think so." (He didn't.)]
So the horizontal speed was low during the "hard left" on the ground track.
Did the astronauts have full discretion for lateral maneuvers like this? Were there at least guidelines for "how hard" you could turn left or right? (the proper space words escape me)
As with any pilot, the mission commander pretty much had discretion to do whatever he felt he needed to do to safely complete the mission. Between the simulator and the LLRV/LLTV, the crews should have had a good sense of what sort of maneuvers were within the safe envelope.
I don't know of any specific mission rules regarding tilt angle or rate limits.
("bonus points") Would this left-right tilting have been called "roll" in this context?
"Roll" is rotating the LM along the forward axis of the spacecraft -- the axis parallel to the direction the crew is looking. Rolling the LM gives you lateral velocity changes, but does not change the facing of the spacecraft.
"Yaw" is rotating the LM along the vertical (engine-to-docking-hatch) axis. This changes the direction you're looking, but not the direction you're moving, because you're in vacuum and don't have any aerodynamic surfaces.
Thus, to safely make a turn in the LM, you have to combine roll and yaw, which is natural for airplane and helicopter pilots. The roll gets you the sideways velocity, and the yaw keeps your windows facing the direction you're going.
It's also possible to make lateral maneuvers using the RCS without changing pitch or roll, but that's a pair of 100-lbf thrusters against a 20,000 lb ship.
how hard was this turn in reality? Did the astronauts have to hang on to avoid being thrown sideways inside the LEM, or was it quite gentle and/or comparable to vertical acceleration transients at this point?
It's perfectly possible to get to a steep roll angle over several seconds without a high roll rate, so there's no reason they would have been thrown around inside the LM.
Did the LM have to tilt substantially (say 20 or 30 degrees) to
vector the thrust laterally?
I don't think they maneuvered quite that drastically; there's full video of the landing available, and while there's definitely some action, I don't think I'm seeing as much as 20 degrees of roll. At 12:45-12:50 I see some significant yaw as well. In the technical debriefing Conrad describes 10 degree excursions in pitch and 10-15 degree yaws, but doesn't speak to roll.
edited Jul 28 at 3:59
answered Jul 28 at 2:35
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
101k3 gold badges354 silver badges439 bronze badges
101k3 gold badges354 silver badges439 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51
$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51
$begingroup$
Quite a thorough answer; thanks!
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 6:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37734%2fhow-hard-did-apollo-12-turn-left-just-before-it-landed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
No numbers, but there's a uniquely Conrad-ish description of the landing in the debrief: "I wheeled it pretty hard" hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12-techdebrief.pdf p.9-11
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:00
$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble To "how hard?" the answer could certainly be "pretty hard" considering the source.
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jul 28 at 2:01
1
$begingroup$
Sounds like it got Bean's attention!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
Jul 28 at 2:02