Minkowski spaceMinkowski MetricMinkowski Metric SignatureMinkowski metric — why does it follow from the constancy of the speed of light?Minkowski spacetime: Is there a signature (+,+,+,+)?Minkowski spacetime vs Euclidian spaceMinkowski metric: Why does it look like it does?Minkowski spacetime with a twist?Understanding space-like hyperplanes in Minkowski spaceCan an a distance in Minkowski space, based on a Euclidean plane, be time-like?Affine space for Minkowski space time
How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
Should I join office cleaning event for free?
Schwarzchild Radius of the Universe
I see my dog run
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
Is there a familial term for apples and pears?
A Journey Through Space and Time
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
Why is an old chain unsafe?
Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning
How to type dʒ symbol (IPA) on Mac?
Patience, young "Padovan"
What Brexit solution does the DUP want?
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
How long does it take to type this?
Draw simple lines in Inkscape
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
XeLaTeX and pdfLaTeX ignore hyphenation
Banach space and Hilbert space topology
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Pronouncing Dictionary.com's W.O.D "vade mecum" in English
Minkowski space
Minkowski MetricMinkowski Metric SignatureMinkowski metric — why does it follow from the constancy of the speed of light?Minkowski spacetime: Is there a signature (+,+,+,+)?Minkowski spacetime vs Euclidian spaceMinkowski metric: Why does it look like it does?Minkowski spacetime with a twist?Understanding space-like hyperplanes in Minkowski spaceCan an a distance in Minkowski space, based on a Euclidean plane, be time-like?Affine space for Minkowski space time
$begingroup$
In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 > 0$
are in the region of spacetime that is time-like.
If it's
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 < 0$
the region is space-like.
But if
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 > 0$
then its "trajectory of light-like particles".
I have understood the first two points about time- and space-like regions but I could not get the third one about "light-like particles".
My confusion is - why just light-like particles? There are many other particles at quantum level.
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
edited 15 hours ago
Gallifreyan
1056
asked yesterday
sk9298sk9298
805
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 > 0$
are in the region of spacetime that is time-like.
If it's
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 < 0$
the region is space-like.
But if
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 > 0$
then its "trajectory of light-like particles".
I have understood the first two points about time- and space-like regions but I could not get the third one about "light-like particles".
My confusion is - why just light-like particles? There are many other particles at quantum level.
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
edited 15 hours ago
Gallifreyan
1056
asked yesterday
sk9298sk9298
805
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 > 0$
are in the region of spacetime that is time-like.
If it's
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 < 0$
the region is space-like.
But if
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 > 0$
then its "trajectory of light-like particles".
I have understood the first two points about time- and space-like regions but I could not get the third one about "light-like particles".
My confusion is - why just light-like particles? There are many other particles at quantum level.
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
edited 15 hours ago
Gallifreyan
1056
asked yesterday
sk9298sk9298
805
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 > 0$
are in the region of spacetime that is time-like.
If it's
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 < 0$
the region is space-like.
But if
$x^2 = t^2 - X^2 > 0$
then its "trajectory of light-like particles".
I have understood the first two points about time- and space-like regions but I could not get the third one about "light-like particles".
My confusion is - why just light-like particles? There are many other particles at quantum level.
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
special-relativity mass metric-tensor causality
edited 15 hours ago
Gallifreyan
1056
asked yesterday
sk9298sk9298
805
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 15 hours ago
Gallifreyan
1056
asked yesterday
sk9298sk9298
805
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 15 hours ago
Gallifreyan
1056
edited 15 hours ago
Gallifreyan
1056
edited 15 hours ago
Gallifreyan
1056
1056
asked yesterday
sk9298sk9298
805
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
sk9298sk9298
805
asked yesterday
sk9298sk9298
805
805
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
yesterday
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
yesterday
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered yesterday
DaleDale
6,6151829
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered yesterday
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470979%2fminkowski-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered yesterday
DaleDale
6,6151829
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered yesterday
DaleDale
6,6151829
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered yesterday
DaleDale
6,6151829
$endgroup$
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.
You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.
An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.
answered yesterday
DaleDale
6,6151829
answered yesterday
DaleDale
6,6151829
answered yesterday
DaleDale
6,6151829
answered yesterday
DaleDale
6,6151829
6,6151829
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered yesterday
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered yesterday
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered yesterday
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
$endgroup$
Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.
The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.
answered yesterday
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
answered yesterday
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
answered yesterday
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
answered yesterday
LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher
32312
32312
add a comment |
add a comment |
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470979%2fminkowski-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
In the future, please use MathJax, not HTML markup, to display math. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– G. Smith
yesterday