Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?When secure email, is not really secureSpam Mail - have someone broke in to my shared hosting account?Could someone stop another from accessing their own online account?Can/do botnets brute force “high value” users of services like Gmail?Hijacked Aol Email Account - Lack of security?Sending password reset links in emailIs there more of a security risk by providing an email when creating a new account?How viable is MITM interception of email, really?Email really sent or not?A safer way to read emails on Android devices
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
How do I create uniquely male characters?
Infinite past with a beginning?
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
How to type dʒ symbol (IPA) on Mac?
Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted
How is this relation reflexive?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
Validation accuracy vs Testing accuracy
How long does it take to type this?
GPS Rollover on Android Smartphones
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Motorized valve interfering with button?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?
What makes Graph invariants so useful/important?
How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
Why is this code 6.5x slower with optimizations enabled?
Draw simple lines in Inkscape
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
When secure email, is not really secureSpam Mail - have someone broke in to my shared hosting account?Could someone stop another from accessing their own online account?Can/do botnets brute force “high value” users of services like Gmail?Hijacked Aol Email Account - Lack of security?Sending password reset links in emailIs there more of a security risk by providing an email when creating a new account?How viable is MITM interception of email, really?Email really sent or not?A safer way to read emails on Android devices
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Over the last week, there is a constant barrage of authentication failures to my email account from a variety of ip addresses - usually in blocks of exactly 575 attempts.
My password is as strong as a password can be so the chance of brute force winning is infinitesimal. However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting provider keeps locking the email account.
Is there anything I can do (or that I can ask my hosting provider to do), or am I just screwed until the botnet moves on? Anyone with similar experience who can comment on whether I can expect this to ever end?
email botnet
New contributor
add a comment |
Over the last week, there is a constant barrage of authentication failures to my email account from a variety of ip addresses - usually in blocks of exactly 575 attempts.
My password is as strong as a password can be so the chance of brute force winning is infinitesimal. However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting provider keeps locking the email account.
Is there anything I can do (or that I can ask my hosting provider to do), or am I just screwed until the botnet moves on? Anyone with similar experience who can comment on whether I can expect this to ever end?
email botnet
New contributor
19
Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?
– schroeder♦
yesterday
5
Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?
– Anders
yesterday
8
Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?
– Nate Eldredge
yesterday
4
Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.
– jww
yesterday
2
I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.
– pat3d3r
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Over the last week, there is a constant barrage of authentication failures to my email account from a variety of ip addresses - usually in blocks of exactly 575 attempts.
My password is as strong as a password can be so the chance of brute force winning is infinitesimal. However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting provider keeps locking the email account.
Is there anything I can do (or that I can ask my hosting provider to do), or am I just screwed until the botnet moves on? Anyone with similar experience who can comment on whether I can expect this to ever end?
email botnet
New contributor
Over the last week, there is a constant barrage of authentication failures to my email account from a variety of ip addresses - usually in blocks of exactly 575 attempts.
My password is as strong as a password can be so the chance of brute force winning is infinitesimal. However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting provider keeps locking the email account.
Is there anything I can do (or that I can ask my hosting provider to do), or am I just screwed until the botnet moves on? Anyone with similar experience who can comment on whether I can expect this to ever end?
email botnet
email botnet
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
clemdiaclemdia
16125
16125
New contributor
New contributor
19
Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?
– schroeder♦
yesterday
5
Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?
– Anders
yesterday
8
Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?
– Nate Eldredge
yesterday
4
Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.
– jww
yesterday
2
I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.
– pat3d3r
15 hours ago
add a comment |
19
Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?
– schroeder♦
yesterday
5
Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?
– Anders
yesterday
8
Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?
– Nate Eldredge
yesterday
4
Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.
– jww
yesterday
2
I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.
– pat3d3r
15 hours ago
19
19
Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?
– schroeder♦
yesterday
Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?
– schroeder♦
yesterday
5
5
Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?
– Anders
yesterday
Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?
– Anders
yesterday
8
8
Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?
– Nate Eldredge
yesterday
Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?
– Nate Eldredge
yesterday
4
4
Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.
– jww
yesterday
Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.
– jww
yesterday
2
2
I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.
– pat3d3r
15 hours ago
I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.
– pat3d3r
15 hours ago
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
A few thoughts:
- Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.
- If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.
- If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)
- Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.
- Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.
4
Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.
– Barmar
yesterday
1
What makes you think he's not already using IMAP?
– Barmar
yesterday
2
@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.
– jpmc26
yesterday
3
I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.
– Barmar
yesterday
3
@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.
– Anders
17 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.
From a random server I have with e-mail:
$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109
That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.
10
This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.
– John Keates
yesterday
True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...
– clemdia
20 hours ago
add a comment |
Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.
From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com
Or something like that.
Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.
As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.
Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.
2
Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.
– Esa Jokinen
20 hours ago
1
THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.
– clemdia
20 hours ago
1
you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain
– sudo rm -rf slash
17 hours ago
add a comment |
You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.
You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,
1
Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.
– Anders
17 hours ago
I read it the same way as you @Anders. The OP clearly asks if they should contact their email provider to fix this.
– Conor Mancone
6 hours ago
add a comment |
tl/dr: This is your hosting company's problem, not yours. You'll have
to contact them to get it fixed. Their security policies shouldn't
lock you out of your own account. They need to do security better.
You already have some answers that I agree heartily with and which cover the technical aspects of this, but I'm throwing in another answer to cover a "business" item. Here you hit on the crux of the issue:
However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting
provider keeps locking the email account.
In otherwords, the problem isn't your problem. You have done everything you can to secure your account on someone else's mail server - you are using a strong password that can't be brute forced. The underlying issue here is that your hosting provider has implemented a bad security policy. As @vidarlo mentioned, this is just the background noise of the internet. Your hosting provider should know this. Unfortunately their chosen response has the side effect of locking you out of your account.
In essence the combination of your hosting company's choice of security policies and the standard password scanning that happens to every server on the internet has resulted in a denial of service (DoS) of your email. If your email went down because someone attempted an actual DoS of your hosting provider and filled their networks with useless bandwidth, the solution would be quite simple. You wouldn't be asking what you can do to fix the problem - you'd be yelling at your provider and asking them to fix it. After all, the whole point of using a third party email service provider is for them to provide you with a service. If you are not being provided with that service, either because their servers went down, or because their network is crippled by a DoS, or because their security policy is overly zealous and locks you out of your account, then the only real solution is for your hosting provider to fix it and provide you with the service that you are paying them to give you.
Many questions we get here are the result of people security all together.. However, there are plenty more examples of people trying to do security but just doing it wrong. This is one of those. You definitely need to yell at your hosting provider. If they can't provide you with the service you are paying for, then you need to switch to a provider that will (although hopefully it won't be the kind of provider that simply doesn't do security at all).
Yes, +1 for this. I work for an email security company, and we have far more intelligent anti-bruteforce systems than the OP is experiencing. This sort of blunt-instrument protection is unnecessary - locking out the legitimate user because of a brute-force is just inviting denial-of-service. Consider changing your email provider if possible...
– Steve Shipway
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "162"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206923%2femail-account-under-attack-really-anything-i-can-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A few thoughts:
- Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.
- If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.
- If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)
- Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.
- Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.
4
Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.
– Barmar
yesterday
1
What makes you think he's not already using IMAP?
– Barmar
yesterday
2
@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.
– jpmc26
yesterday
3
I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.
– Barmar
yesterday
3
@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.
– Anders
17 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
A few thoughts:
- Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.
- If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.
- If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)
- Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.
- Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.
4
Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.
– Barmar
yesterday
1
What makes you think he's not already using IMAP?
– Barmar
yesterday
2
@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.
– jpmc26
yesterday
3
I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.
– Barmar
yesterday
3
@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.
– Anders
17 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
A few thoughts:
- Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.
- If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.
- If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)
- Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.
- Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.
A few thoughts:
- Usually my first recommendation would be to pick an extremely strong password. But you allready got that covered.
- If there is two factor authentication available, turn it on. If you are lucky, it might make you an unattractive target and cause the attacker to move on.
- If the account lock out doesn't affect other methods of reading your mail, like via IMAP, you could switch to that to maintain access. (To be honest, I don't know much about the security of IMAP, so you might want to consider that before turning it on.)
- Forwarding the mail somewhere else will also ensure that you can read it even if your account is locked.
- Finally, you can try contacting your email provider. I think your best bet here is to just describe the problem to them, and ask what they can do to help you.
answered yesterday
AndersAnders
50.1k22144166
50.1k22144166
4
Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.
– Barmar
yesterday
1
What makes you think he's not already using IMAP?
– Barmar
yesterday
2
@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.
– jpmc26
yesterday
3
I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.
– Barmar
yesterday
3
@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.
– Anders
17 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
4
Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.
– Barmar
yesterday
1
What makes you think he's not already using IMAP?
– Barmar
yesterday
2
@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.
– jpmc26
yesterday
3
I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.
– Barmar
yesterday
3
@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.
– Anders
17 hours ago
4
4
Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.
– Barmar
yesterday
Would 2FA really help? The second factor isn't usually attemped until after a correct password is entered, and the attacker will never get that far.
– Barmar
yesterday
1
1
What makes you think he's not already using IMAP?
– Barmar
yesterday
What makes you think he's not already using IMAP?
– Barmar
yesterday
2
2
@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.
– jpmc26
yesterday
@Barmar If the attacker's script isn't written to try to enter anything on the second factor, it might prevent the lock out. Worth a try at least.
– jpmc26
yesterday
3
3
I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.
– Barmar
yesterday
I think most 2FA systems don't prompt for the second factor until after you successfully pass the first.
– Barmar
yesterday
3
3
@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.
– Anders
17 hours ago
@Barmar Yes, that is true, but my advice still stands. There is a non zero chance it helps, the effort is near zero, the risk is zero, and you should probably do it anyway. So even if it probably doesn't help, you should still do it.
– Anders
17 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.
From a random server I have with e-mail:
$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109
That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.
10
This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.
– John Keates
yesterday
True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...
– clemdia
20 hours ago
add a comment |
No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.
From a random server I have with e-mail:
$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109
That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.
10
This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.
– John Keates
yesterday
True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...
– clemdia
20 hours ago
add a comment |
No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.
From a random server I have with e-mail:
$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109
That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.
No. That's pretty much the background noise of being on the internet.
From a random server I have with e-mail:
$ sudo grep -c "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log
1109
That's today. It's with fail2ban blocking more than five attempts from the same IP.
answered yesterday
vidarlovidarlo
3,704723
3,704723
10
This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.
– John Keates
yesterday
True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...
– clemdia
20 hours ago
add a comment |
10
This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.
– John Keates
yesterday
True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...
– clemdia
20 hours ago
10
10
This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.
– John Keates
yesterday
This is not the same thing. He is referring to one specific account, not the complete authentication log for a mailserver. This is attempts at one specific user.
– John Keates
yesterday
True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...
– clemdia
20 hours ago
True it is my account specifically - but I think vidario has it right in a general sense. My hosting company recently updated their implementation of csf, and I wonder if it’s too strict - I’ve been wondering if the attacks are nothing new - just a new policy of locking account after “x failed attempts in y minutes”...
– clemdia
20 hours ago
add a comment |
Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.
From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com
Or something like that.
Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.
As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.
Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.
2
Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.
– Esa Jokinen
20 hours ago
1
THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.
– clemdia
20 hours ago
1
you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain
– sudo rm -rf slash
17 hours ago
add a comment |
Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.
From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com
Or something like that.
Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.
As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.
Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.
2
Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.
– Esa Jokinen
20 hours ago
1
THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.
– clemdia
20 hours ago
1
you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain
– sudo rm -rf slash
17 hours ago
add a comment |
Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.
From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com
Or something like that.
Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.
As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.
Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.
Yeah, it's pretty easy to have your official email address forward your emails to a new "burner" email account. Then in the new email account setup, you set your From: field to your official email address. That way mails go out like this.
From: account-I-always-had@oldserver.com
Subject: Re: so-and-so
In-Reply-To: <4735813474834434634@theirmail.com>
Sender: burneraccount@newserver.com
Or something like that.
Anyway, that lets you keep your identity at the official email address. The attacks on the login server are irrelevant to receiving and forwarding email.
As is evident from the above, your new email address may be obvious from headers so don't set up an autoresponder. Only correspond with people you trust. If this burner email account comes under attack, trash this burner account, setup another one, and tell the official email server to forward to the new burner.
Then, research who you sent mail to in the last 2 days to the last burner account. One of them compromised it. Use one tactic or another to trick them into attacking this or another burner account, that lets you distinguish who exactly did it.
answered yesterday
HarperHarper
2,110413
2,110413
2
Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.
– Esa Jokinen
20 hours ago
1
THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.
– clemdia
20 hours ago
1
you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain
– sudo rm -rf slash
17 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.
– Esa Jokinen
20 hours ago
1
THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.
– clemdia
20 hours ago
1
you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain
– sudo rm -rf slash
17 hours ago
2
2
Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.
– Esa Jokinen
20 hours ago
Or if possible, change username to be different from the address. This way you reply from the same address and have the same mailbox, but prevent account lockout.
– Esa Jokinen
20 hours ago
1
1
THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.
– clemdia
20 hours ago
THIS (if only it were possible) - btw this experience has highlighted the lunacy of websites REQUIRING email address as username - just stupid.
– clemdia
20 hours ago
1
1
you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain
– sudo rm -rf slash
17 hours ago
you might try using + to add a per domain suffix. then when you get spam it will (most likely) include who leaked your email. plus it becomes easy to block all emails that came from the domain
– sudo rm -rf slash
17 hours ago
add a comment |
You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.
You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,
1
Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.
– Anders
17 hours ago
I read it the same way as you @Anders. The OP clearly asks if they should contact their email provider to fix this.
– Conor Mancone
6 hours ago
add a comment |
You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.
You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,
1
Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.
– Anders
17 hours ago
I read it the same way as you @Anders. The OP clearly asks if they should contact their email provider to fix this.
– Conor Mancone
6 hours ago
add a comment |
You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.
You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,
You can set a firewall before your server and with right configuration you can reduce brute force attempts.
You try with your MTA configuration, an example can be Postfix:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
permit permit_mynetworks,
permit_inet_interfaces,
answered 20 hours ago
MirsadMirsad
6,72352348
6,72352348
1
Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.
– Anders
17 hours ago
I read it the same way as you @Anders. The OP clearly asks if they should contact their email provider to fix this.
– Conor Mancone
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.
– Anders
17 hours ago
I read it the same way as you @Anders. The OP clearly asks if they should contact their email provider to fix this.
– Conor Mancone
6 hours ago
1
1
Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.
– Anders
17 hours ago
Are you assuming OP is running their own email server? I assumed the opposite, but now I am not sure what I think.
– Anders
17 hours ago
I read it the same way as you @Anders. The OP clearly asks if they should contact their email provider to fix this.
– Conor Mancone
6 hours ago
I read it the same way as you @Anders. The OP clearly asks if they should contact their email provider to fix this.
– Conor Mancone
6 hours ago
add a comment |
tl/dr: This is your hosting company's problem, not yours. You'll have
to contact them to get it fixed. Their security policies shouldn't
lock you out of your own account. They need to do security better.
You already have some answers that I agree heartily with and which cover the technical aspects of this, but I'm throwing in another answer to cover a "business" item. Here you hit on the crux of the issue:
However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting
provider keeps locking the email account.
In otherwords, the problem isn't your problem. You have done everything you can to secure your account on someone else's mail server - you are using a strong password that can't be brute forced. The underlying issue here is that your hosting provider has implemented a bad security policy. As @vidarlo mentioned, this is just the background noise of the internet. Your hosting provider should know this. Unfortunately their chosen response has the side effect of locking you out of your account.
In essence the combination of your hosting company's choice of security policies and the standard password scanning that happens to every server on the internet has resulted in a denial of service (DoS) of your email. If your email went down because someone attempted an actual DoS of your hosting provider and filled their networks with useless bandwidth, the solution would be quite simple. You wouldn't be asking what you can do to fix the problem - you'd be yelling at your provider and asking them to fix it. After all, the whole point of using a third party email service provider is for them to provide you with a service. If you are not being provided with that service, either because their servers went down, or because their network is crippled by a DoS, or because their security policy is overly zealous and locks you out of your account, then the only real solution is for your hosting provider to fix it and provide you with the service that you are paying them to give you.
Many questions we get here are the result of people security all together.. However, there are plenty more examples of people trying to do security but just doing it wrong. This is one of those. You definitely need to yell at your hosting provider. If they can't provide you with the service you are paying for, then you need to switch to a provider that will (although hopefully it won't be the kind of provider that simply doesn't do security at all).
Yes, +1 for this. I work for an email security company, and we have far more intelligent anti-bruteforce systems than the OP is experiencing. This sort of blunt-instrument protection is unnecessary - locking out the legitimate user because of a brute-force is just inviting denial-of-service. Consider changing your email provider if possible...
– Steve Shipway
3 hours ago
add a comment |
tl/dr: This is your hosting company's problem, not yours. You'll have
to contact them to get it fixed. Their security policies shouldn't
lock you out of your own account. They need to do security better.
You already have some answers that I agree heartily with and which cover the technical aspects of this, but I'm throwing in another answer to cover a "business" item. Here you hit on the crux of the issue:
However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting
provider keeps locking the email account.
In otherwords, the problem isn't your problem. You have done everything you can to secure your account on someone else's mail server - you are using a strong password that can't be brute forced. The underlying issue here is that your hosting provider has implemented a bad security policy. As @vidarlo mentioned, this is just the background noise of the internet. Your hosting provider should know this. Unfortunately their chosen response has the side effect of locking you out of your account.
In essence the combination of your hosting company's choice of security policies and the standard password scanning that happens to every server on the internet has resulted in a denial of service (DoS) of your email. If your email went down because someone attempted an actual DoS of your hosting provider and filled their networks with useless bandwidth, the solution would be quite simple. You wouldn't be asking what you can do to fix the problem - you'd be yelling at your provider and asking them to fix it. After all, the whole point of using a third party email service provider is for them to provide you with a service. If you are not being provided with that service, either because their servers went down, or because their network is crippled by a DoS, or because their security policy is overly zealous and locks you out of your account, then the only real solution is for your hosting provider to fix it and provide you with the service that you are paying them to give you.
Many questions we get here are the result of people security all together.. However, there are plenty more examples of people trying to do security but just doing it wrong. This is one of those. You definitely need to yell at your hosting provider. If they can't provide you with the service you are paying for, then you need to switch to a provider that will (although hopefully it won't be the kind of provider that simply doesn't do security at all).
Yes, +1 for this. I work for an email security company, and we have far more intelligent anti-bruteforce systems than the OP is experiencing. This sort of blunt-instrument protection is unnecessary - locking out the legitimate user because of a brute-force is just inviting denial-of-service. Consider changing your email provider if possible...
– Steve Shipway
3 hours ago
add a comment |
tl/dr: This is your hosting company's problem, not yours. You'll have
to contact them to get it fixed. Their security policies shouldn't
lock you out of your own account. They need to do security better.
You already have some answers that I agree heartily with and which cover the technical aspects of this, but I'm throwing in another answer to cover a "business" item. Here you hit on the crux of the issue:
However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting
provider keeps locking the email account.
In otherwords, the problem isn't your problem. You have done everything you can to secure your account on someone else's mail server - you are using a strong password that can't be brute forced. The underlying issue here is that your hosting provider has implemented a bad security policy. As @vidarlo mentioned, this is just the background noise of the internet. Your hosting provider should know this. Unfortunately their chosen response has the side effect of locking you out of your account.
In essence the combination of your hosting company's choice of security policies and the standard password scanning that happens to every server on the internet has resulted in a denial of service (DoS) of your email. If your email went down because someone attempted an actual DoS of your hosting provider and filled their networks with useless bandwidth, the solution would be quite simple. You wouldn't be asking what you can do to fix the problem - you'd be yelling at your provider and asking them to fix it. After all, the whole point of using a third party email service provider is for them to provide you with a service. If you are not being provided with that service, either because their servers went down, or because their network is crippled by a DoS, or because their security policy is overly zealous and locks you out of your account, then the only real solution is for your hosting provider to fix it and provide you with the service that you are paying them to give you.
Many questions we get here are the result of people security all together.. However, there are plenty more examples of people trying to do security but just doing it wrong. This is one of those. You definitely need to yell at your hosting provider. If they can't provide you with the service you are paying for, then you need to switch to a provider that will (although hopefully it won't be the kind of provider that simply doesn't do security at all).
tl/dr: This is your hosting company's problem, not yours. You'll have
to contact them to get it fixed. Their security policies shouldn't
lock you out of your own account. They need to do security better.
You already have some answers that I agree heartily with and which cover the technical aspects of this, but I'm throwing in another answer to cover a "business" item. Here you hit on the crux of the issue:
However as a result of the authentication failures, my hosting
provider keeps locking the email account.
In otherwords, the problem isn't your problem. You have done everything you can to secure your account on someone else's mail server - you are using a strong password that can't be brute forced. The underlying issue here is that your hosting provider has implemented a bad security policy. As @vidarlo mentioned, this is just the background noise of the internet. Your hosting provider should know this. Unfortunately their chosen response has the side effect of locking you out of your account.
In essence the combination of your hosting company's choice of security policies and the standard password scanning that happens to every server on the internet has resulted in a denial of service (DoS) of your email. If your email went down because someone attempted an actual DoS of your hosting provider and filled their networks with useless bandwidth, the solution would be quite simple. You wouldn't be asking what you can do to fix the problem - you'd be yelling at your provider and asking them to fix it. After all, the whole point of using a third party email service provider is for them to provide you with a service. If you are not being provided with that service, either because their servers went down, or because their network is crippled by a DoS, or because their security policy is overly zealous and locks you out of your account, then the only real solution is for your hosting provider to fix it and provide you with the service that you are paying them to give you.
Many questions we get here are the result of people security all together.. However, there are plenty more examples of people trying to do security but just doing it wrong. This is one of those. You definitely need to yell at your hosting provider. If they can't provide you with the service you are paying for, then you need to switch to a provider that will (although hopefully it won't be the kind of provider that simply doesn't do security at all).
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Conor ManconeConor Mancone
10.4k32151
10.4k32151
Yes, +1 for this. I work for an email security company, and we have far more intelligent anti-bruteforce systems than the OP is experiencing. This sort of blunt-instrument protection is unnecessary - locking out the legitimate user because of a brute-force is just inviting denial-of-service. Consider changing your email provider if possible...
– Steve Shipway
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, +1 for this. I work for an email security company, and we have far more intelligent anti-bruteforce systems than the OP is experiencing. This sort of blunt-instrument protection is unnecessary - locking out the legitimate user because of a brute-force is just inviting denial-of-service. Consider changing your email provider if possible...
– Steve Shipway
3 hours ago
Yes, +1 for this. I work for an email security company, and we have far more intelligent anti-bruteforce systems than the OP is experiencing. This sort of blunt-instrument protection is unnecessary - locking out the legitimate user because of a brute-force is just inviting denial-of-service. Consider changing your email provider if possible...
– Steve Shipway
3 hours ago
Yes, +1 for this. I work for an email security company, and we have far more intelligent anti-bruteforce systems than the OP is experiencing. This sort of blunt-instrument protection is unnecessary - locking out the legitimate user because of a brute-force is just inviting denial-of-service. Consider changing your email provider if possible...
– Steve Shipway
3 hours ago
add a comment |
clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
clemdia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206923%2femail-account-under-attack-really-anything-i-can-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
19
Ask your email provider to make a change, that's the only options. In the meantime, open a new account and forward all emails to your new account so that you are still functional?
– schroeder♦
yesterday
5
Are you using one of the big email providers (Gmail, etc) or something smaller?
– Anders
yesterday
8
Get a better provider that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of trivial DoS?
– Nate Eldredge
yesterday
4
Maybe another account is under attack (Bank? Facebook? Income tax refund? Domain in your possession?), and they are taking out your email so you don't get notified.
– jww
yesterday
2
I had a similar experience with my account: The culprit actually was my phone, that had an outdated password for the account and repeatedly tried to log into it unsuccessfully.
– pat3d3r
15 hours ago