Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

My colleague's body is amazing

Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

Japan - Plan around max visa duration

Example of a relative pronoun

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Can town administrative "code" overule state laws like those forbidding trespassing?

Banach space and Hilbert space topology

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Simulate Bitwise Cyclic Tag

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

Non-Jewish family in an Orthodox Jewish Wedding

least quadratic residue under GRH: an EXPLICIT bound

Can a German sentence have two subjects?



Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?


Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?













4












$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    yesterday















4












$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    yesterday













4












4








4


0



$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$







complexity-theory






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl

814




814




New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    yesterday












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    yesterday







3




3




$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
yesterday




$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
yesterday












$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
yesterday




$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



$A (i)$



  1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

  2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "419"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



    $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



    $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



    Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



    $A (i)$



    1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

    2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

    This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$

















      6












      $begingroup$

      I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



      $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



      $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



      Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



      $A (i)$



      1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

      2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

      This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



        $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



        $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



        Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



        $A (i)$



        1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

        2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

        This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



        $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



        $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



        Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



        $A (i)$



        1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

        2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

        This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.







        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 5 hours ago





















        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered yesterday









        Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl

        814




        814




        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?