Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.Prove that lines intersecting parallel similar triangles are concurrentDoes proving that two lines are parallel require a postulate?proving that $BC' parallel B'C$Without using angle measure how do I prove two lines are parallel to the same line are parallel to each other?Two congruent segments does have the same length?Two triangles cirumcribed a conic problemShow that two parallel lines have the same direction vector from a different definition of parallel lines.Proof: Two triangles have the same ratio of length for each corresponding side then they are similarIf the heights of two triangles are proportional then prove that they are similiarIf ratio of sides of two triangles is constant then the triangles have the same angles

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

New order #4: World

N.B. ligature in Latex

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

Set-theoretical foundations of Mathematics with only bounded quantifiers

How can I hide my bitcoin transactions to protect anonymity from others?

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?

What is the logic behind how bash tests for true/false?

Schwarzchild Radius of the Universe

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

Copycat chess is back

How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?

Shell script can be run only with sh command

How do I create uniquely male characters?

Should I join office cleaning event for free?

A Journey Through Space and Time

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

Can I interfere when another PC is about to be attacked?

whey we use polarized capacitor?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?



Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.


Prove that lines intersecting parallel similar triangles are concurrentDoes proving that two lines are parallel require a postulate?proving that $BC' parallel B'C$Without using angle measure how do I prove two lines are parallel to the same line are parallel to each other?Two congruent segments does have the same length?Two triangles cirumcribed a conic problemShow that two parallel lines have the same direction vector from a different definition of parallel lines.Proof: Two triangles have the same ratio of length for each corresponding side then they are similarIf the heights of two triangles are proportional then prove that they are similiarIf ratio of sides of two triangles is constant then the triangles have the same angles













6












$begingroup$


enter image description here



Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, as shown above, with |AB|=|A'B'| have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.



I've tried proving by contradiction:



Suppose they are not congruent but have the same perimeter, then either
|AC|$neq$|A'C| or |BC|$neq$ |B'C'|.
Let's say |AC|$neq$|A'C'|, and suppose that |AC| $lt$ |A'C'|.



If |BC|=|B'C'| then the triangles would be congruent which is false from my assumption.



If |BC| $gt$ |B'C'| then |A'C'| + |B'C'| $gt$ |AC| + |BC| which is false because their perimeters should be equal.



On the last possible case, |BC|$gt$|B'C'| I got stuck. I can't find a way to show that it is false.



How can I show that the last case is false?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    But you have gone to the case AC<A'C', so from BC=B'C' you don't get congruent.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, sorry. Let's just say that |A'C'| + |B'C'| > |AC| + |BC| for that one too, which is false.
    $endgroup$
    – Ban
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    If $BC=B'C'$ and $AB=A'B'$ then the perimeters are not equal. I hope someone posts an elementary solution not involving conics or functions.
    $endgroup$
    – BPP
    7 hours ago















6












$begingroup$


enter image description here



Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, as shown above, with |AB|=|A'B'| have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.



I've tried proving by contradiction:



Suppose they are not congruent but have the same perimeter, then either
|AC|$neq$|A'C| or |BC|$neq$ |B'C'|.
Let's say |AC|$neq$|A'C'|, and suppose that |AC| $lt$ |A'C'|.



If |BC|=|B'C'| then the triangles would be congruent which is false from my assumption.



If |BC| $gt$ |B'C'| then |A'C'| + |B'C'| $gt$ |AC| + |BC| which is false because their perimeters should be equal.



On the last possible case, |BC|$gt$|B'C'| I got stuck. I can't find a way to show that it is false.



How can I show that the last case is false?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    But you have gone to the case AC<A'C', so from BC=B'C' you don't get congruent.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, sorry. Let's just say that |A'C'| + |B'C'| > |AC| + |BC| for that one too, which is false.
    $endgroup$
    – Ban
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    If $BC=B'C'$ and $AB=A'B'$ then the perimeters are not equal. I hope someone posts an elementary solution not involving conics or functions.
    $endgroup$
    – BPP
    7 hours ago













6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


enter image description here



Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, as shown above, with |AB|=|A'B'| have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.



I've tried proving by contradiction:



Suppose they are not congruent but have the same perimeter, then either
|AC|$neq$|A'C| or |BC|$neq$ |B'C'|.
Let's say |AC|$neq$|A'C'|, and suppose that |AC| $lt$ |A'C'|.



If |BC|=|B'C'| then the triangles would be congruent which is false from my assumption.



If |BC| $gt$ |B'C'| then |A'C'| + |B'C'| $gt$ |AC| + |BC| which is false because their perimeters should be equal.



On the last possible case, |BC|$gt$|B'C'| I got stuck. I can't find a way to show that it is false.



How can I show that the last case is false?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




enter image description here



Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, as shown above, with |AB|=|A'B'| have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.



I've tried proving by contradiction:



Suppose they are not congruent but have the same perimeter, then either
|AC|$neq$|A'C| or |BC|$neq$ |B'C'|.
Let's say |AC|$neq$|A'C'|, and suppose that |AC| $lt$ |A'C'|.



If |BC|=|B'C'| then the triangles would be congruent which is false from my assumption.



If |BC| $gt$ |B'C'| then |A'C'| + |B'C'| $gt$ |AC| + |BC| which is false because their perimeters should be equal.



On the last possible case, |BC|$gt$|B'C'| I got stuck. I can't find a way to show that it is false.



How can I show that the last case is false?







geometry euclidean-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









BanBan

703




703











  • $begingroup$
    But you have gone to the case AC<A'C', so from BC=B'C' you don't get congruent.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, sorry. Let's just say that |A'C'| + |B'C'| > |AC| + |BC| for that one too, which is false.
    $endgroup$
    – Ban
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    If $BC=B'C'$ and $AB=A'B'$ then the perimeters are not equal. I hope someone posts an elementary solution not involving conics or functions.
    $endgroup$
    – BPP
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    But you have gone to the case AC<A'C', so from BC=B'C' you don't get congruent.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, sorry. Let's just say that |A'C'| + |B'C'| > |AC| + |BC| for that one too, which is false.
    $endgroup$
    – Ban
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    If $BC=B'C'$ and $AB=A'B'$ then the perimeters are not equal. I hope someone posts an elementary solution not involving conics or functions.
    $endgroup$
    – BPP
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
But you have gone to the case AC<A'C', so from BC=B'C' you don't get congruent.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
yesterday




$begingroup$
But you have gone to the case AC<A'C', so from BC=B'C' you don't get congruent.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
yesterday












$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry. Let's just say that |A'C'| + |B'C'| > |AC| + |BC| for that one too, which is false.
$endgroup$
– Ban
yesterday




$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry. Let's just say that |A'C'| + |B'C'| > |AC| + |BC| for that one too, which is false.
$endgroup$
– Ban
yesterday












$begingroup$
If $BC=B'C'$ and $AB=A'B'$ then the perimeters are not equal. I hope someone posts an elementary solution not involving conics or functions.
$endgroup$
– BPP
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
If $BC=B'C'$ and $AB=A'B'$ then the perimeters are not equal. I hope someone posts an elementary solution not involving conics or functions.
$endgroup$
– BPP
7 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Fix $ A' $ and $ B' $. As $ AB = A'B' $ is fixed, the points $ C' $ for which $ ABC $ has the same perimeter as $ A'B'C' $ are the points for which $ AC + BC = A'C' + B'C' $. You recognize here the definition of an ellipse of focus $ A' $ and $ B' $. Hence the locus of $ C' $ is an ellipse.
Finally, $ C' $ is in the meantime on an ellipse and on a line. These two have two intersections which give the directly and indirectly congruents triangles.



The easiest way to uncover your last case is using the ellipse argument.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    8












    $begingroup$

    Imagine that $AB$ is fixed on the bottom line and $C$ varies from way off left to way off right. The perimeter of the triangle is a decreasing function until triangle $ABC$ is isosceles, then increasing. It's clear from the symmetry that it takes on every value greater than its minimum value at just two points symmetrical with respect to the perpendicular bisector of $AB$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      This argument is clear except between the two right-angled cases, when $angle ABC$ or $angle CAB$ is a right angle. Then it's not clear whether the perimeter is increasing or decreasing, as one of the sides is getting longer while the other is getting shorter. Calculus or algebra (reduction to quadratic) could be used here. As such, this is only a partial solution
      $endgroup$
      – man on laptop
      10 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @manonlaptop I thought about that case. It's intuitively clear that at any point the longer leg is changing faster than the shorter leg. (As you commented, you only need that observation when the triangle is acute.) You could provide a rigorous algebraic proof. I'm sure you could do it synthetically with Euclid.
      $endgroup$
      – Ethan Bolker
      10 hours ago


















    5












    $begingroup$

    As an alternative proof, because the triangles are built on parallel lines, they have the same area. Using Heron's Formula
    $$
    A = frac14sqrt(AB + AC + BC)(-AB + AC + BC)(AB - AC + BC)(AB + AC - BC)
    $$

    and a bit of algebra, you can show that either $AC = A'C'$ and $BC = B'C'$ or $AC = B'C'$ and $BC = A'C'$. In both cases $ABC cong A'B'C'$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      Let's say the distance between the two lines is $1$. Put an $x$ axis on the lower line, and a $y$ axis through the first point in the triangle. This ensures that the bottom left point of the triangle has coordinate $(0,0)$. Place the $(1,0)$ coordinate on the bottom right corner of the triangle.



      If the third point of the triangle is on $(x,1)$, then the diameter is $$f(x) = sqrt1 + x^2 + sqrt1 + (1-x)^2 + 1$$.



      Observe that $f(x)$ has a line of symmetry at $x=0.5$. In other words, if you do the substitution $u = 1-x$ you get the same function.



      Next observe by plotting or by differentiation that the function is monotonically decreasing when $x < 0.5$ and increasing when $x > 0.5$.



      By the previous paragraph, if a triangle exists with a certain diameter, at most only one other triangle can exist with that diameter. Moreover, the paragraph previous to that says that this other triangle can be reflected at the line $x=0.5$ to yield the first.



      Q.E.D.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177306%2fshow-that-if-two-triangles-built-on-parallel-lines-with-equal-bases-have-the-sa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        8












        $begingroup$

        Fix $ A' $ and $ B' $. As $ AB = A'B' $ is fixed, the points $ C' $ for which $ ABC $ has the same perimeter as $ A'B'C' $ are the points for which $ AC + BC = A'C' + B'C' $. You recognize here the definition of an ellipse of focus $ A' $ and $ B' $. Hence the locus of $ C' $ is an ellipse.
        Finally, $ C' $ is in the meantime on an ellipse and on a line. These two have two intersections which give the directly and indirectly congruents triangles.



        The easiest way to uncover your last case is using the ellipse argument.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          8












          $begingroup$

          Fix $ A' $ and $ B' $. As $ AB = A'B' $ is fixed, the points $ C' $ for which $ ABC $ has the same perimeter as $ A'B'C' $ are the points for which $ AC + BC = A'C' + B'C' $. You recognize here the definition of an ellipse of focus $ A' $ and $ B' $. Hence the locus of $ C' $ is an ellipse.
          Finally, $ C' $ is in the meantime on an ellipse and on a line. These two have two intersections which give the directly and indirectly congruents triangles.



          The easiest way to uncover your last case is using the ellipse argument.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            8












            8








            8





            $begingroup$

            Fix $ A' $ and $ B' $. As $ AB = A'B' $ is fixed, the points $ C' $ for which $ ABC $ has the same perimeter as $ A'B'C' $ are the points for which $ AC + BC = A'C' + B'C' $. You recognize here the definition of an ellipse of focus $ A' $ and $ B' $. Hence the locus of $ C' $ is an ellipse.
            Finally, $ C' $ is in the meantime on an ellipse and on a line. These two have two intersections which give the directly and indirectly congruents triangles.



            The easiest way to uncover your last case is using the ellipse argument.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Fix $ A' $ and $ B' $. As $ AB = A'B' $ is fixed, the points $ C' $ for which $ ABC $ has the same perimeter as $ A'B'C' $ are the points for which $ AC + BC = A'C' + B'C' $. You recognize here the definition of an ellipse of focus $ A' $ and $ B' $. Hence the locus of $ C' $ is an ellipse.
            Finally, $ C' $ is in the meantime on an ellipse and on a line. These two have two intersections which give the directly and indirectly congruents triangles.



            The easiest way to uncover your last case is using the ellipse argument.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            AstaulpheAstaulphe

            865




            865





















                8












                $begingroup$

                Imagine that $AB$ is fixed on the bottom line and $C$ varies from way off left to way off right. The perimeter of the triangle is a decreasing function until triangle $ABC$ is isosceles, then increasing. It's clear from the symmetry that it takes on every value greater than its minimum value at just two points symmetrical with respect to the perpendicular bisector of $AB$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This argument is clear except between the two right-angled cases, when $angle ABC$ or $angle CAB$ is a right angle. Then it's not clear whether the perimeter is increasing or decreasing, as one of the sides is getting longer while the other is getting shorter. Calculus or algebra (reduction to quadratic) could be used here. As such, this is only a partial solution
                  $endgroup$
                  – man on laptop
                  10 hours ago











                • $begingroup$
                  @manonlaptop I thought about that case. It's intuitively clear that at any point the longer leg is changing faster than the shorter leg. (As you commented, you only need that observation when the triangle is acute.) You could provide a rigorous algebraic proof. I'm sure you could do it synthetically with Euclid.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ethan Bolker
                  10 hours ago















                8












                $begingroup$

                Imagine that $AB$ is fixed on the bottom line and $C$ varies from way off left to way off right. The perimeter of the triangle is a decreasing function until triangle $ABC$ is isosceles, then increasing. It's clear from the symmetry that it takes on every value greater than its minimum value at just two points symmetrical with respect to the perpendicular bisector of $AB$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This argument is clear except between the two right-angled cases, when $angle ABC$ or $angle CAB$ is a right angle. Then it's not clear whether the perimeter is increasing or decreasing, as one of the sides is getting longer while the other is getting shorter. Calculus or algebra (reduction to quadratic) could be used here. As such, this is only a partial solution
                  $endgroup$
                  – man on laptop
                  10 hours ago











                • $begingroup$
                  @manonlaptop I thought about that case. It's intuitively clear that at any point the longer leg is changing faster than the shorter leg. (As you commented, you only need that observation when the triangle is acute.) You could provide a rigorous algebraic proof. I'm sure you could do it synthetically with Euclid.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ethan Bolker
                  10 hours ago













                8












                8








                8





                $begingroup$

                Imagine that $AB$ is fixed on the bottom line and $C$ varies from way off left to way off right. The perimeter of the triangle is a decreasing function until triangle $ABC$ is isosceles, then increasing. It's clear from the symmetry that it takes on every value greater than its minimum value at just two points symmetrical with respect to the perpendicular bisector of $AB$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Imagine that $AB$ is fixed on the bottom line and $C$ varies from way off left to way off right. The perimeter of the triangle is a decreasing function until triangle $ABC$ is isosceles, then increasing. It's clear from the symmetry that it takes on every value greater than its minimum value at just two points symmetrical with respect to the perpendicular bisector of $AB$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker

                45.8k553120




                45.8k553120







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This argument is clear except between the two right-angled cases, when $angle ABC$ or $angle CAB$ is a right angle. Then it's not clear whether the perimeter is increasing or decreasing, as one of the sides is getting longer while the other is getting shorter. Calculus or algebra (reduction to quadratic) could be used here. As such, this is only a partial solution
                  $endgroup$
                  – man on laptop
                  10 hours ago











                • $begingroup$
                  @manonlaptop I thought about that case. It's intuitively clear that at any point the longer leg is changing faster than the shorter leg. (As you commented, you only need that observation when the triangle is acute.) You could provide a rigorous algebraic proof. I'm sure you could do it synthetically with Euclid.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ethan Bolker
                  10 hours ago












                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  This argument is clear except between the two right-angled cases, when $angle ABC$ or $angle CAB$ is a right angle. Then it's not clear whether the perimeter is increasing or decreasing, as one of the sides is getting longer while the other is getting shorter. Calculus or algebra (reduction to quadratic) could be used here. As such, this is only a partial solution
                  $endgroup$
                  – man on laptop
                  10 hours ago











                • $begingroup$
                  @manonlaptop I thought about that case. It's intuitively clear that at any point the longer leg is changing faster than the shorter leg. (As you commented, you only need that observation when the triangle is acute.) You could provide a rigorous algebraic proof. I'm sure you could do it synthetically with Euclid.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ethan Bolker
                  10 hours ago







                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                This argument is clear except between the two right-angled cases, when $angle ABC$ or $angle CAB$ is a right angle. Then it's not clear whether the perimeter is increasing or decreasing, as one of the sides is getting longer while the other is getting shorter. Calculus or algebra (reduction to quadratic) could be used here. As such, this is only a partial solution
                $endgroup$
                – man on laptop
                10 hours ago





                $begingroup$
                This argument is clear except between the two right-angled cases, when $angle ABC$ or $angle CAB$ is a right angle. Then it's not clear whether the perimeter is increasing or decreasing, as one of the sides is getting longer while the other is getting shorter. Calculus or algebra (reduction to quadratic) could be used here. As such, this is only a partial solution
                $endgroup$
                – man on laptop
                10 hours ago













                $begingroup$
                @manonlaptop I thought about that case. It's intuitively clear that at any point the longer leg is changing faster than the shorter leg. (As you commented, you only need that observation when the triangle is acute.) You could provide a rigorous algebraic proof. I'm sure you could do it synthetically with Euclid.
                $endgroup$
                – Ethan Bolker
                10 hours ago




                $begingroup$
                @manonlaptop I thought about that case. It's intuitively clear that at any point the longer leg is changing faster than the shorter leg. (As you commented, you only need that observation when the triangle is acute.) You could provide a rigorous algebraic proof. I'm sure you could do it synthetically with Euclid.
                $endgroup$
                – Ethan Bolker
                10 hours ago











                5












                $begingroup$

                As an alternative proof, because the triangles are built on parallel lines, they have the same area. Using Heron's Formula
                $$
                A = frac14sqrt(AB + AC + BC)(-AB + AC + BC)(AB - AC + BC)(AB + AC - BC)
                $$

                and a bit of algebra, you can show that either $AC = A'C'$ and $BC = B'C'$ or $AC = B'C'$ and $BC = A'C'$. In both cases $ABC cong A'B'C'$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  5












                  $begingroup$

                  As an alternative proof, because the triangles are built on parallel lines, they have the same area. Using Heron's Formula
                  $$
                  A = frac14sqrt(AB + AC + BC)(-AB + AC + BC)(AB - AC + BC)(AB + AC - BC)
                  $$

                  and a bit of algebra, you can show that either $AC = A'C'$ and $BC = B'C'$ or $AC = B'C'$ and $BC = A'C'$. In both cases $ABC cong A'B'C'$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    5












                    5








                    5





                    $begingroup$

                    As an alternative proof, because the triangles are built on parallel lines, they have the same area. Using Heron's Formula
                    $$
                    A = frac14sqrt(AB + AC + BC)(-AB + AC + BC)(AB - AC + BC)(AB + AC - BC)
                    $$

                    and a bit of algebra, you can show that either $AC = A'C'$ and $BC = B'C'$ or $AC = B'C'$ and $BC = A'C'$. In both cases $ABC cong A'B'C'$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    As an alternative proof, because the triangles are built on parallel lines, they have the same area. Using Heron's Formula
                    $$
                    A = frac14sqrt(AB + AC + BC)(-AB + AC + BC)(AB - AC + BC)(AB + AC - BC)
                    $$

                    and a bit of algebra, you can show that either $AC = A'C'$ and $BC = B'C'$ or $AC = B'C'$ and $BC = A'C'$. In both cases $ABC cong A'B'C'$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    eyeballfrogeyeballfrog

                    7,202633




                    7,202633





















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Let's say the distance between the two lines is $1$. Put an $x$ axis on the lower line, and a $y$ axis through the first point in the triangle. This ensures that the bottom left point of the triangle has coordinate $(0,0)$. Place the $(1,0)$ coordinate on the bottom right corner of the triangle.



                        If the third point of the triangle is on $(x,1)$, then the diameter is $$f(x) = sqrt1 + x^2 + sqrt1 + (1-x)^2 + 1$$.



                        Observe that $f(x)$ has a line of symmetry at $x=0.5$. In other words, if you do the substitution $u = 1-x$ you get the same function.



                        Next observe by plotting or by differentiation that the function is monotonically decreasing when $x < 0.5$ and increasing when $x > 0.5$.



                        By the previous paragraph, if a triangle exists with a certain diameter, at most only one other triangle can exist with that diameter. Moreover, the paragraph previous to that says that this other triangle can be reflected at the line $x=0.5$ to yield the first.



                        Q.E.D.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Let's say the distance between the two lines is $1$. Put an $x$ axis on the lower line, and a $y$ axis through the first point in the triangle. This ensures that the bottom left point of the triangle has coordinate $(0,0)$. Place the $(1,0)$ coordinate on the bottom right corner of the triangle.



                          If the third point of the triangle is on $(x,1)$, then the diameter is $$f(x) = sqrt1 + x^2 + sqrt1 + (1-x)^2 + 1$$.



                          Observe that $f(x)$ has a line of symmetry at $x=0.5$. In other words, if you do the substitution $u = 1-x$ you get the same function.



                          Next observe by plotting or by differentiation that the function is monotonically decreasing when $x < 0.5$ and increasing when $x > 0.5$.



                          By the previous paragraph, if a triangle exists with a certain diameter, at most only one other triangle can exist with that diameter. Moreover, the paragraph previous to that says that this other triangle can be reflected at the line $x=0.5$ to yield the first.



                          Q.E.D.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Let's say the distance between the two lines is $1$. Put an $x$ axis on the lower line, and a $y$ axis through the first point in the triangle. This ensures that the bottom left point of the triangle has coordinate $(0,0)$. Place the $(1,0)$ coordinate on the bottom right corner of the triangle.



                            If the third point of the triangle is on $(x,1)$, then the diameter is $$f(x) = sqrt1 + x^2 + sqrt1 + (1-x)^2 + 1$$.



                            Observe that $f(x)$ has a line of symmetry at $x=0.5$. In other words, if you do the substitution $u = 1-x$ you get the same function.



                            Next observe by plotting or by differentiation that the function is monotonically decreasing when $x < 0.5$ and increasing when $x > 0.5$.



                            By the previous paragraph, if a triangle exists with a certain diameter, at most only one other triangle can exist with that diameter. Moreover, the paragraph previous to that says that this other triangle can be reflected at the line $x=0.5$ to yield the first.



                            Q.E.D.






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            Let's say the distance between the two lines is $1$. Put an $x$ axis on the lower line, and a $y$ axis through the first point in the triangle. This ensures that the bottom left point of the triangle has coordinate $(0,0)$. Place the $(1,0)$ coordinate on the bottom right corner of the triangle.



                            If the third point of the triangle is on $(x,1)$, then the diameter is $$f(x) = sqrt1 + x^2 + sqrt1 + (1-x)^2 + 1$$.



                            Observe that $f(x)$ has a line of symmetry at $x=0.5$. In other words, if you do the substitution $u = 1-x$ you get the same function.



                            Next observe by plotting or by differentiation that the function is monotonically decreasing when $x < 0.5$ and increasing when $x > 0.5$.



                            By the previous paragraph, if a triangle exists with a certain diameter, at most only one other triangle can exist with that diameter. Moreover, the paragraph previous to that says that this other triangle can be reflected at the line $x=0.5$ to yield the first.



                            Q.E.D.







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited 7 hours ago

























                            answered 11 hours ago









                            man on laptopman on laptop

                            5,83111538




                            5,83111538



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177306%2fshow-that-if-two-triangles-built-on-parallel-lines-with-equal-bases-have-the-sa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                                Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                                Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?