from ekwos to ippo : transition from kw to p in greekWhy is “Aurora Borealis” from Greek, but “Aurora Australis” from Latin?How to understand etymology derived from obscure languages?Etmology of Old French 'escorgier' : How does 'bind' evolve to mean 'whip'?Etymology of 'commode' into French and then EnglishDeceptive affix changes?What did the Greek 'peripherein' carry?Did the English 'confer' evolve from the Middle French « conférer » ?Etymology of 'but', from West Germanic to Old EnglishIs there a relationship between Arabic ka'b and Greek kybos?Where did the Greek word diaballein got it's meaning from accusing and divide from?

Smallest Guaranteed hash collision cycle length

Word for being out at night during curfew

Was this a power play by Daenerys?

How does Howard Stark know this?

What is Plautus’s pun about frustum and frustrum?

How to slow yourself down (for playing nice with others)

Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?

Was this character’s old age look CGI or make-up?

Should these notes be played as a chord or one after another?

Is there a spell to protect inanimate objects?

Do atomic orbitals "pulse" in time?

Usefulness of complex chord names?

Find the cipher used

How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?

Front derailleur hard to move due to gear cable angle

How to compact two the parabol commands in the following example?

How do I tell my supervisor that he is choosing poor replacements for me while I am on maternity leave?

Setting the major mode of a new buffer interactively

Why doesn't Rocket Lab use a solid stage?

Does Lawful Interception of 4G / the proposed 5G provide a back door for hackers as well?

How can this pool heater gas line be disconnected?

Why do Thanos's punches not kill Captain America or at least cause some mortal injuries?

Plastic-on-plastic lubricant that wont leave a residue?

Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete space



from ekwos to ippo : transition from kw to p in greek


Why is “Aurora Borealis” from Greek, but “Aurora Australis” from Latin?How to understand etymology derived from obscure languages?Etmology of Old French 'escorgier' : How does 'bind' evolve to mean 'whip'?Etymology of 'commode' into French and then EnglishDeceptive affix changes?What did the Greek 'peripherein' carry?Did the English 'confer' evolve from the Middle French « conférer » ?Etymology of 'but', from West Germanic to Old EnglishIs there a relationship between Arabic ka'b and Greek kybos?Where did the Greek word diaballein got it's meaning from accusing and divide from?













3















I can't understand how the transition from kappa-digamma to pi-pi happened in the transition from ekwos (same etymology as latin equus) to ippo.



I mean how did the prononciation change ? Because is it a matter of prononciation ?










share|improve this question







New contributor



J.A is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 3





    It is a matter of pronunciation, presumably the labial part of /kw/ becoming stronger and eventually the velar part being lost. It might seem unlikely, but it appears to have happened at least four times independently and at widely differing periods in various IE languages: in pre-Greek as you say; in Oscan; in P-Celtic (Welsh etc); and in Romanian.

    – Colin Fine
    May 7 at 22:43






  • 2





    Also note that this seems to be on-topic both here and on Latin.SE (which also covers Greek), so both are viable places to ask questions like this in the future! (Nothing wrong posting it here though)

    – Draconis
    May 7 at 23:18






  • 2





    I completely deny that I'm here because I thought HNQ was advertising a linguistics question about Ewoks.

    – David Richerby
    May 8 at 8:32
















3















I can't understand how the transition from kappa-digamma to pi-pi happened in the transition from ekwos (same etymology as latin equus) to ippo.



I mean how did the prononciation change ? Because is it a matter of prononciation ?










share|improve this question







New contributor



J.A is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 3





    It is a matter of pronunciation, presumably the labial part of /kw/ becoming stronger and eventually the velar part being lost. It might seem unlikely, but it appears to have happened at least four times independently and at widely differing periods in various IE languages: in pre-Greek as you say; in Oscan; in P-Celtic (Welsh etc); and in Romanian.

    – Colin Fine
    May 7 at 22:43






  • 2





    Also note that this seems to be on-topic both here and on Latin.SE (which also covers Greek), so both are viable places to ask questions like this in the future! (Nothing wrong posting it here though)

    – Draconis
    May 7 at 23:18






  • 2





    I completely deny that I'm here because I thought HNQ was advertising a linguistics question about Ewoks.

    – David Richerby
    May 8 at 8:32














3












3








3








I can't understand how the transition from kappa-digamma to pi-pi happened in the transition from ekwos (same etymology as latin equus) to ippo.



I mean how did the prononciation change ? Because is it a matter of prononciation ?










share|improve this question







New contributor



J.A is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I can't understand how the transition from kappa-digamma to pi-pi happened in the transition from ekwos (same etymology as latin equus) to ippo.



I mean how did the prononciation change ? Because is it a matter of prononciation ?







etymology pronunciation greek






share|improve this question







New contributor



J.A is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question







New contributor



J.A is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor



J.A is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked May 7 at 22:10









J.AJ.A

1183




1183




New contributor



J.A is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




J.A is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 3





    It is a matter of pronunciation, presumably the labial part of /kw/ becoming stronger and eventually the velar part being lost. It might seem unlikely, but it appears to have happened at least four times independently and at widely differing periods in various IE languages: in pre-Greek as you say; in Oscan; in P-Celtic (Welsh etc); and in Romanian.

    – Colin Fine
    May 7 at 22:43






  • 2





    Also note that this seems to be on-topic both here and on Latin.SE (which also covers Greek), so both are viable places to ask questions like this in the future! (Nothing wrong posting it here though)

    – Draconis
    May 7 at 23:18






  • 2





    I completely deny that I'm here because I thought HNQ was advertising a linguistics question about Ewoks.

    – David Richerby
    May 8 at 8:32













  • 3





    It is a matter of pronunciation, presumably the labial part of /kw/ becoming stronger and eventually the velar part being lost. It might seem unlikely, but it appears to have happened at least four times independently and at widely differing periods in various IE languages: in pre-Greek as you say; in Oscan; in P-Celtic (Welsh etc); and in Romanian.

    – Colin Fine
    May 7 at 22:43






  • 2





    Also note that this seems to be on-topic both here and on Latin.SE (which also covers Greek), so both are viable places to ask questions like this in the future! (Nothing wrong posting it here though)

    – Draconis
    May 7 at 23:18






  • 2





    I completely deny that I'm here because I thought HNQ was advertising a linguistics question about Ewoks.

    – David Richerby
    May 8 at 8:32








3




3





It is a matter of pronunciation, presumably the labial part of /kw/ becoming stronger and eventually the velar part being lost. It might seem unlikely, but it appears to have happened at least four times independently and at widely differing periods in various IE languages: in pre-Greek as you say; in Oscan; in P-Celtic (Welsh etc); and in Romanian.

– Colin Fine
May 7 at 22:43





It is a matter of pronunciation, presumably the labial part of /kw/ becoming stronger and eventually the velar part being lost. It might seem unlikely, but it appears to have happened at least four times independently and at widely differing periods in various IE languages: in pre-Greek as you say; in Oscan; in P-Celtic (Welsh etc); and in Romanian.

– Colin Fine
May 7 at 22:43




2




2





Also note that this seems to be on-topic both here and on Latin.SE (which also covers Greek), so both are viable places to ask questions like this in the future! (Nothing wrong posting it here though)

– Draconis
May 7 at 23:18





Also note that this seems to be on-topic both here and on Latin.SE (which also covers Greek), so both are viable places to ask questions like this in the future! (Nothing wrong posting it here though)

– Draconis
May 7 at 23:18




2




2





I completely deny that I'm here because I thought HNQ was advertising a linguistics question about Ewoks.

– David Richerby
May 8 at 8:32






I completely deny that I'm here because I thought HNQ was advertising a linguistics question about Ewoks.

– David Richerby
May 8 at 8:32











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11














The key is, there was never a digamma in hippos in the first place! (At least, not as far back as we have evidence for: there may have been one earlier than that.)



Early Greek, like Latin, had a set of labiovelar consonants. In other words, what the Romans wrote as qu and linguists write as /kʷ/ wasn't treated as a combination of /k/ and /w/ (kappa-digamma): it was a single phoneme in its own right.



(As a note, the tradition among Greek scholars is to write this single phoneme as q or /q/, based on how the Romans did it, even though this doesn't line up with the IPA. Confusing, but it's what we're stuck with now, so in this answer q always means a voiceless labiovelar stop. Some people even call it "qoppa", the name of an unrelated Greek letter, which is just outright a bad idea if you want people to understand you.)



In the oldest attested stages of Greek, the Linear B tablets from Crete, we can see that there was indeed a q: the word for "horse" is written 𐀂𐀦 i-qo, which represents hiqqos (h, double consonants, and final -s weren't represented in this writing system). It's not clear where the hi came from, since we don't see anything similar in Latin or other languages, but that's a separate question.



But the q sound was never completely comfortable in Greek. It's not one of the easier or more common sounds in the world, and requires you to do something with your lips and with your soft palate at the same time. So over the years, Greek disposed of it, replacing it with other sounds.



In Attic in particular, q could turn into either p (keeping only the lip part), k (keeping only the soft palate part), or t (averaging the two).



  • Next to u, it became k (the "boukolos rule")

  • Before e or i, it became t

  • Elsewhere, it became p

This is why you see tin- "pay" next to poin- "fine", or thein- "kill (v)" next to phon- "slaughter (n)", or bou-kol- "cowherd" next to amphi-pol- "attendant", and so on. Note that these rules are only for Attic: this wasn't consistent across dialects. Compare Latin quis "who" and -que "and", Mycenaean (Linear B) qis, -qe, Attic tis, -te, Doric kis, -ke.



In the word for "horse", the q fell into the "otherwise" clause, so it changed from hiqqos to hippos.




P.S. While this sound change may look odd, it's not uncommon in the world. Both Proto-Italic and Proto-Celtic split into two branches each, one preserving q, the other turning it into p. And much later, Romanian did the same to all of Latin's qs.






share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    It might be worth mentioning that while there may not be a recorded stage of Greek where hippos had a separate /w/ sound, from a comparative standpoint, a cluster /ḱ.w/ rather than a unitary phoneme /kʷ/ is reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European, to account for stuff like the śv cluster in Sanskrit aśva. The coalescence of this cluster to a labiovelar would have only happened after the split between the ancestor of Sanskrit and the ancestor of Greek.

    – sumelic
    May 7 at 23:46







  • 1





    This was common enough to get a generalized name for the phenomenon; I was taught that Greek was a "labializing dialect" of PIE, which meant that the original labiovelar consonants had smeared across the oral space from lips to velum like soluble fractions displayed in a chromatography chart.

    – jlawler
    May 8 at 21:11











  • @jlawler Interesting! That's not a term I've heard before

    – Draconis
    May 8 at 21:12


















4














If you analyze phonemes into components, /kw/ is velar+stop+labialized. Then if you remove "velar", then you have stop+labialized = /p/. So basically, the change /kw/ > /p(p)/ amounts to a weakening of velarization.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "312"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    J.A is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31371%2ffrom-ekwos-to-ippo-transition-from-kw-to-p-in-greek%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11














    The key is, there was never a digamma in hippos in the first place! (At least, not as far back as we have evidence for: there may have been one earlier than that.)



    Early Greek, like Latin, had a set of labiovelar consonants. In other words, what the Romans wrote as qu and linguists write as /kʷ/ wasn't treated as a combination of /k/ and /w/ (kappa-digamma): it was a single phoneme in its own right.



    (As a note, the tradition among Greek scholars is to write this single phoneme as q or /q/, based on how the Romans did it, even though this doesn't line up with the IPA. Confusing, but it's what we're stuck with now, so in this answer q always means a voiceless labiovelar stop. Some people even call it "qoppa", the name of an unrelated Greek letter, which is just outright a bad idea if you want people to understand you.)



    In the oldest attested stages of Greek, the Linear B tablets from Crete, we can see that there was indeed a q: the word for "horse" is written 𐀂𐀦 i-qo, which represents hiqqos (h, double consonants, and final -s weren't represented in this writing system). It's not clear where the hi came from, since we don't see anything similar in Latin or other languages, but that's a separate question.



    But the q sound was never completely comfortable in Greek. It's not one of the easier or more common sounds in the world, and requires you to do something with your lips and with your soft palate at the same time. So over the years, Greek disposed of it, replacing it with other sounds.



    In Attic in particular, q could turn into either p (keeping only the lip part), k (keeping only the soft palate part), or t (averaging the two).



    • Next to u, it became k (the "boukolos rule")

    • Before e or i, it became t

    • Elsewhere, it became p

    This is why you see tin- "pay" next to poin- "fine", or thein- "kill (v)" next to phon- "slaughter (n)", or bou-kol- "cowherd" next to amphi-pol- "attendant", and so on. Note that these rules are only for Attic: this wasn't consistent across dialects. Compare Latin quis "who" and -que "and", Mycenaean (Linear B) qis, -qe, Attic tis, -te, Doric kis, -ke.



    In the word for "horse", the q fell into the "otherwise" clause, so it changed from hiqqos to hippos.




    P.S. While this sound change may look odd, it's not uncommon in the world. Both Proto-Italic and Proto-Celtic split into two branches each, one preserving q, the other turning it into p. And much later, Romanian did the same to all of Latin's qs.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 4





      It might be worth mentioning that while there may not be a recorded stage of Greek where hippos had a separate /w/ sound, from a comparative standpoint, a cluster /ḱ.w/ rather than a unitary phoneme /kʷ/ is reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European, to account for stuff like the śv cluster in Sanskrit aśva. The coalescence of this cluster to a labiovelar would have only happened after the split between the ancestor of Sanskrit and the ancestor of Greek.

      – sumelic
      May 7 at 23:46







    • 1





      This was common enough to get a generalized name for the phenomenon; I was taught that Greek was a "labializing dialect" of PIE, which meant that the original labiovelar consonants had smeared across the oral space from lips to velum like soluble fractions displayed in a chromatography chart.

      – jlawler
      May 8 at 21:11











    • @jlawler Interesting! That's not a term I've heard before

      – Draconis
      May 8 at 21:12















    11














    The key is, there was never a digamma in hippos in the first place! (At least, not as far back as we have evidence for: there may have been one earlier than that.)



    Early Greek, like Latin, had a set of labiovelar consonants. In other words, what the Romans wrote as qu and linguists write as /kʷ/ wasn't treated as a combination of /k/ and /w/ (kappa-digamma): it was a single phoneme in its own right.



    (As a note, the tradition among Greek scholars is to write this single phoneme as q or /q/, based on how the Romans did it, even though this doesn't line up with the IPA. Confusing, but it's what we're stuck with now, so in this answer q always means a voiceless labiovelar stop. Some people even call it "qoppa", the name of an unrelated Greek letter, which is just outright a bad idea if you want people to understand you.)



    In the oldest attested stages of Greek, the Linear B tablets from Crete, we can see that there was indeed a q: the word for "horse" is written 𐀂𐀦 i-qo, which represents hiqqos (h, double consonants, and final -s weren't represented in this writing system). It's not clear where the hi came from, since we don't see anything similar in Latin or other languages, but that's a separate question.



    But the q sound was never completely comfortable in Greek. It's not one of the easier or more common sounds in the world, and requires you to do something with your lips and with your soft palate at the same time. So over the years, Greek disposed of it, replacing it with other sounds.



    In Attic in particular, q could turn into either p (keeping only the lip part), k (keeping only the soft palate part), or t (averaging the two).



    • Next to u, it became k (the "boukolos rule")

    • Before e or i, it became t

    • Elsewhere, it became p

    This is why you see tin- "pay" next to poin- "fine", or thein- "kill (v)" next to phon- "slaughter (n)", or bou-kol- "cowherd" next to amphi-pol- "attendant", and so on. Note that these rules are only for Attic: this wasn't consistent across dialects. Compare Latin quis "who" and -que "and", Mycenaean (Linear B) qis, -qe, Attic tis, -te, Doric kis, -ke.



    In the word for "horse", the q fell into the "otherwise" clause, so it changed from hiqqos to hippos.




    P.S. While this sound change may look odd, it's not uncommon in the world. Both Proto-Italic and Proto-Celtic split into two branches each, one preserving q, the other turning it into p. And much later, Romanian did the same to all of Latin's qs.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 4





      It might be worth mentioning that while there may not be a recorded stage of Greek where hippos had a separate /w/ sound, from a comparative standpoint, a cluster /ḱ.w/ rather than a unitary phoneme /kʷ/ is reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European, to account for stuff like the śv cluster in Sanskrit aśva. The coalescence of this cluster to a labiovelar would have only happened after the split between the ancestor of Sanskrit and the ancestor of Greek.

      – sumelic
      May 7 at 23:46







    • 1





      This was common enough to get a generalized name for the phenomenon; I was taught that Greek was a "labializing dialect" of PIE, which meant that the original labiovelar consonants had smeared across the oral space from lips to velum like soluble fractions displayed in a chromatography chart.

      – jlawler
      May 8 at 21:11











    • @jlawler Interesting! That's not a term I've heard before

      – Draconis
      May 8 at 21:12













    11












    11








    11







    The key is, there was never a digamma in hippos in the first place! (At least, not as far back as we have evidence for: there may have been one earlier than that.)



    Early Greek, like Latin, had a set of labiovelar consonants. In other words, what the Romans wrote as qu and linguists write as /kʷ/ wasn't treated as a combination of /k/ and /w/ (kappa-digamma): it was a single phoneme in its own right.



    (As a note, the tradition among Greek scholars is to write this single phoneme as q or /q/, based on how the Romans did it, even though this doesn't line up with the IPA. Confusing, but it's what we're stuck with now, so in this answer q always means a voiceless labiovelar stop. Some people even call it "qoppa", the name of an unrelated Greek letter, which is just outright a bad idea if you want people to understand you.)



    In the oldest attested stages of Greek, the Linear B tablets from Crete, we can see that there was indeed a q: the word for "horse" is written 𐀂𐀦 i-qo, which represents hiqqos (h, double consonants, and final -s weren't represented in this writing system). It's not clear where the hi came from, since we don't see anything similar in Latin or other languages, but that's a separate question.



    But the q sound was never completely comfortable in Greek. It's not one of the easier or more common sounds in the world, and requires you to do something with your lips and with your soft palate at the same time. So over the years, Greek disposed of it, replacing it with other sounds.



    In Attic in particular, q could turn into either p (keeping only the lip part), k (keeping only the soft palate part), or t (averaging the two).



    • Next to u, it became k (the "boukolos rule")

    • Before e or i, it became t

    • Elsewhere, it became p

    This is why you see tin- "pay" next to poin- "fine", or thein- "kill (v)" next to phon- "slaughter (n)", or bou-kol- "cowherd" next to amphi-pol- "attendant", and so on. Note that these rules are only for Attic: this wasn't consistent across dialects. Compare Latin quis "who" and -que "and", Mycenaean (Linear B) qis, -qe, Attic tis, -te, Doric kis, -ke.



    In the word for "horse", the q fell into the "otherwise" clause, so it changed from hiqqos to hippos.




    P.S. While this sound change may look odd, it's not uncommon in the world. Both Proto-Italic and Proto-Celtic split into two branches each, one preserving q, the other turning it into p. And much later, Romanian did the same to all of Latin's qs.






    share|improve this answer















    The key is, there was never a digamma in hippos in the first place! (At least, not as far back as we have evidence for: there may have been one earlier than that.)



    Early Greek, like Latin, had a set of labiovelar consonants. In other words, what the Romans wrote as qu and linguists write as /kʷ/ wasn't treated as a combination of /k/ and /w/ (kappa-digamma): it was a single phoneme in its own right.



    (As a note, the tradition among Greek scholars is to write this single phoneme as q or /q/, based on how the Romans did it, even though this doesn't line up with the IPA. Confusing, but it's what we're stuck with now, so in this answer q always means a voiceless labiovelar stop. Some people even call it "qoppa", the name of an unrelated Greek letter, which is just outright a bad idea if you want people to understand you.)



    In the oldest attested stages of Greek, the Linear B tablets from Crete, we can see that there was indeed a q: the word for "horse" is written 𐀂𐀦 i-qo, which represents hiqqos (h, double consonants, and final -s weren't represented in this writing system). It's not clear where the hi came from, since we don't see anything similar in Latin or other languages, but that's a separate question.



    But the q sound was never completely comfortable in Greek. It's not one of the easier or more common sounds in the world, and requires you to do something with your lips and with your soft palate at the same time. So over the years, Greek disposed of it, replacing it with other sounds.



    In Attic in particular, q could turn into either p (keeping only the lip part), k (keeping only the soft palate part), or t (averaging the two).



    • Next to u, it became k (the "boukolos rule")

    • Before e or i, it became t

    • Elsewhere, it became p

    This is why you see tin- "pay" next to poin- "fine", or thein- "kill (v)" next to phon- "slaughter (n)", or bou-kol- "cowherd" next to amphi-pol- "attendant", and so on. Note that these rules are only for Attic: this wasn't consistent across dialects. Compare Latin quis "who" and -que "and", Mycenaean (Linear B) qis, -qe, Attic tis, -te, Doric kis, -ke.



    In the word for "horse", the q fell into the "otherwise" clause, so it changed from hiqqos to hippos.




    P.S. While this sound change may look odd, it's not uncommon in the world. Both Proto-Italic and Proto-Celtic split into two branches each, one preserving q, the other turning it into p. And much later, Romanian did the same to all of Latin's qs.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 8 at 1:22

























    answered May 7 at 22:57









    DraconisDraconis

    14.1k12258




    14.1k12258







    • 4





      It might be worth mentioning that while there may not be a recorded stage of Greek where hippos had a separate /w/ sound, from a comparative standpoint, a cluster /ḱ.w/ rather than a unitary phoneme /kʷ/ is reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European, to account for stuff like the śv cluster in Sanskrit aśva. The coalescence of this cluster to a labiovelar would have only happened after the split between the ancestor of Sanskrit and the ancestor of Greek.

      – sumelic
      May 7 at 23:46







    • 1





      This was common enough to get a generalized name for the phenomenon; I was taught that Greek was a "labializing dialect" of PIE, which meant that the original labiovelar consonants had smeared across the oral space from lips to velum like soluble fractions displayed in a chromatography chart.

      – jlawler
      May 8 at 21:11











    • @jlawler Interesting! That's not a term I've heard before

      – Draconis
      May 8 at 21:12












    • 4





      It might be worth mentioning that while there may not be a recorded stage of Greek where hippos had a separate /w/ sound, from a comparative standpoint, a cluster /ḱ.w/ rather than a unitary phoneme /kʷ/ is reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European, to account for stuff like the śv cluster in Sanskrit aśva. The coalescence of this cluster to a labiovelar would have only happened after the split between the ancestor of Sanskrit and the ancestor of Greek.

      – sumelic
      May 7 at 23:46







    • 1





      This was common enough to get a generalized name for the phenomenon; I was taught that Greek was a "labializing dialect" of PIE, which meant that the original labiovelar consonants had smeared across the oral space from lips to velum like soluble fractions displayed in a chromatography chart.

      – jlawler
      May 8 at 21:11











    • @jlawler Interesting! That's not a term I've heard before

      – Draconis
      May 8 at 21:12







    4




    4





    It might be worth mentioning that while there may not be a recorded stage of Greek where hippos had a separate /w/ sound, from a comparative standpoint, a cluster /ḱ.w/ rather than a unitary phoneme /kʷ/ is reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European, to account for stuff like the śv cluster in Sanskrit aśva. The coalescence of this cluster to a labiovelar would have only happened after the split between the ancestor of Sanskrit and the ancestor of Greek.

    – sumelic
    May 7 at 23:46






    It might be worth mentioning that while there may not be a recorded stage of Greek where hippos had a separate /w/ sound, from a comparative standpoint, a cluster /ḱ.w/ rather than a unitary phoneme /kʷ/ is reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European, to account for stuff like the śv cluster in Sanskrit aśva. The coalescence of this cluster to a labiovelar would have only happened after the split between the ancestor of Sanskrit and the ancestor of Greek.

    – sumelic
    May 7 at 23:46





    1




    1





    This was common enough to get a generalized name for the phenomenon; I was taught that Greek was a "labializing dialect" of PIE, which meant that the original labiovelar consonants had smeared across the oral space from lips to velum like soluble fractions displayed in a chromatography chart.

    – jlawler
    May 8 at 21:11





    This was common enough to get a generalized name for the phenomenon; I was taught that Greek was a "labializing dialect" of PIE, which meant that the original labiovelar consonants had smeared across the oral space from lips to velum like soluble fractions displayed in a chromatography chart.

    – jlawler
    May 8 at 21:11













    @jlawler Interesting! That's not a term I've heard before

    – Draconis
    May 8 at 21:12





    @jlawler Interesting! That's not a term I've heard before

    – Draconis
    May 8 at 21:12











    4














    If you analyze phonemes into components, /kw/ is velar+stop+labialized. Then if you remove "velar", then you have stop+labialized = /p/. So basically, the change /kw/ > /p(p)/ amounts to a weakening of velarization.






    share|improve this answer



























      4














      If you analyze phonemes into components, /kw/ is velar+stop+labialized. Then if you remove "velar", then you have stop+labialized = /p/. So basically, the change /kw/ > /p(p)/ amounts to a weakening of velarization.






      share|improve this answer

























        4












        4








        4







        If you analyze phonemes into components, /kw/ is velar+stop+labialized. Then if you remove "velar", then you have stop+labialized = /p/. So basically, the change /kw/ > /p(p)/ amounts to a weakening of velarization.






        share|improve this answer













        If you analyze phonemes into components, /kw/ is velar+stop+labialized. Then if you remove "velar", then you have stop+labialized = /p/. So basically, the change /kw/ > /p(p)/ amounts to a weakening of velarization.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 8 at 7:24









        Arnaud FournetArnaud Fournet

        1,01827




        1,01827




















            J.A is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            J.A is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            J.A is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            J.A is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31371%2ffrom-ekwos-to-ippo-transition-from-kw-to-p-in-greek%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

            Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

            Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?