Is there an errata that changes the effect of the Irresistible Spell Metamagic feat from Kingdoms of Kalamar?Is Kalamar Campaign Setting official or 3rd party?Multiple Metamagic Feats, Spell Slot Adjustments and Effective Spell LevelDoes Tenebrous Spell improve shadow spells?How does Persistent Spell work with spells that have a duration?What happens when you use heighten spell on a spell already affected by a metamagic feat?How does heighten spell work when other metamagic feats are also applied?Can a character without caster levels learn a metamagic feat?Can a spellcaster choose to deal nonlethal damage with a touch weapon-like spell?Can I use both the arcana Empowered Magic (Su) and the Empower Spell (Metamagic) on one spell?What is a known spell for the purpose of the Uncanny Forethought feat?Does Spell Perfection allow Quicken Spell to reduce a spell's casting time?
What are the implications of the new alleged key recovery attack preprint on SIMON?
Size of a folder with du
Light Switch Terminals
Can I use my laptop, which says 100-240V, in the USA?
Bishop Berkeley's ideas put to the test
Exclude loop* snap devices from lsblk output?
Was this a power play by Daenerys?
Why is “Ich wusste, dass aus dir mal was wird” grammitally correct?
Reaction of borax with NaOH
How many are the non-negative integer solutions of 𝑥 + 𝑦 + 𝑤 + 𝑧 = 16 where x < y?
When a land becomes a creature, is it untapped?
Drawing lines to nearest point
Why does my circuit work on a breadboard, but not on a perfboard? I am new to soldering
How does noise-cancellation work in Mac laptops?
How to prevent cooked noodles & dumplings from getting soggy
How can dragons propel their breath attacks to a long distance
A curve pass via points at TiKz
Can the sorting of a list be verified without comparing neighbors?
How do I tell my supervisor that he is choosing poor replacements for me while I am on maternity leave?
Is taking modulus on both sides of an equation valid?
Plastic-on-plastic lubricant that wont leave a residue?
On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder
Why was Thor doubtful about his worthiness to Mjolnir?
Make all the squares explode
Is there an errata that changes the effect of the Irresistible Spell Metamagic feat from Kingdoms of Kalamar?
Is Kalamar Campaign Setting official or 3rd party?Multiple Metamagic Feats, Spell Slot Adjustments and Effective Spell LevelDoes Tenebrous Spell improve shadow spells?How does Persistent Spell work with spells that have a duration?What happens when you use heighten spell on a spell already affected by a metamagic feat?How does heighten spell work when other metamagic feats are also applied?Can a character without caster levels learn a metamagic feat?Can a spellcaster choose to deal nonlethal damage with a touch weapon-like spell?Can I use both the arcana Empowered Magic (Su) and the Empower Spell (Metamagic) on one spell?What is a known spell for the purpose of the Uncanny Forethought feat?Does Spell Perfection allow Quicken Spell to reduce a spell's casting time?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
So the metamagic feat known as Irresistible Spell is from a campaign setting known as KoK (Kingdoms of Kalamar) a relatively unknown setting. If you have the metamagic feats Envelop the Wall (another KoK feat) and Maximize Spell and also have a Spellcaster level 7+, you can qualify for this feat.
Irrestible Spell has the following benefit:
Spells you cast that normally allow a saving throw do not allow a saving throw. An irresistible spell uses up a spell slot 4 levels higher than the spell's actual level.
A friend of mine says that there was an errata about it that changes the effect so that it instead add a +10 to the DC instead. Does anyone know where this errata can be found or is called?
I cannot for the life of me find any reference to it.
dnd-3.5e feats dnd-3e metamagic errata
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So the metamagic feat known as Irresistible Spell is from a campaign setting known as KoK (Kingdoms of Kalamar) a relatively unknown setting. If you have the metamagic feats Envelop the Wall (another KoK feat) and Maximize Spell and also have a Spellcaster level 7+, you can qualify for this feat.
Irrestible Spell has the following benefit:
Spells you cast that normally allow a saving throw do not allow a saving throw. An irresistible spell uses up a spell slot 4 levels higher than the spell's actual level.
A friend of mine says that there was an errata about it that changes the effect so that it instead add a +10 to the DC instead. Does anyone know where this errata can be found or is called?
I cannot for the life of me find any reference to it.
dnd-3.5e feats dnd-3e metamagic errata
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
FWIW, I've seen the same errata mentioned in other discussions of Irresistible Spell (like this one, for example).
$endgroup$
– Miniman
May 8 at 6:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So the metamagic feat known as Irresistible Spell is from a campaign setting known as KoK (Kingdoms of Kalamar) a relatively unknown setting. If you have the metamagic feats Envelop the Wall (another KoK feat) and Maximize Spell and also have a Spellcaster level 7+, you can qualify for this feat.
Irrestible Spell has the following benefit:
Spells you cast that normally allow a saving throw do not allow a saving throw. An irresistible spell uses up a spell slot 4 levels higher than the spell's actual level.
A friend of mine says that there was an errata about it that changes the effect so that it instead add a +10 to the DC instead. Does anyone know where this errata can be found or is called?
I cannot for the life of me find any reference to it.
dnd-3.5e feats dnd-3e metamagic errata
$endgroup$
So the metamagic feat known as Irresistible Spell is from a campaign setting known as KoK (Kingdoms of Kalamar) a relatively unknown setting. If you have the metamagic feats Envelop the Wall (another KoK feat) and Maximize Spell and also have a Spellcaster level 7+, you can qualify for this feat.
Irrestible Spell has the following benefit:
Spells you cast that normally allow a saving throw do not allow a saving throw. An irresistible spell uses up a spell slot 4 levels higher than the spell's actual level.
A friend of mine says that there was an errata about it that changes the effect so that it instead add a +10 to the DC instead. Does anyone know where this errata can be found or is called?
I cannot for the life of me find any reference to it.
dnd-3.5e feats dnd-3e metamagic errata
dnd-3.5e feats dnd-3e metamagic errata
edited May 8 at 5:31
V2Blast
29.1k5105177
29.1k5105177
asked May 8 at 5:19
Raven JovanRaven Jovan
637
637
$begingroup$
FWIW, I've seen the same errata mentioned in other discussions of Irresistible Spell (like this one, for example).
$endgroup$
– Miniman
May 8 at 6:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
FWIW, I've seen the same errata mentioned in other discussions of Irresistible Spell (like this one, for example).
$endgroup$
– Miniman
May 8 at 6:41
$begingroup$
FWIW, I've seen the same errata mentioned in other discussions of Irresistible Spell (like this one, for example).
$endgroup$
– Miniman
May 8 at 6:41
$begingroup$
FWIW, I've seen the same errata mentioned in other discussions of Irresistible Spell (like this one, for example).
$endgroup$
– Miniman
May 8 at 6:41
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The feat was printed in its altered form in KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Realms
A bit of googling turned up this post in a GiTP thread where the mystery is helpfully explained by user ZamielVanWeber:
Here is the tale: Irresistible Spell was printed in the WotC official Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Handbook as is. There are 3 errata filed to that book, none of which mention any change. However, in the unofficial 3.5 update to the KoK Player's Handbook called Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands irresistible spell was changed to +10 to the save DC.
And indeed, on digging up a copy of the Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands, it features the altered version of Irresistible Spell. The short description in the feats table still states it allows the caster to "forbid saving throws" (as can be seen in the free preview of the book), but its descriptive entry in the full text only has it add +10 to the DC.
What makes it "unofficial"?
The "official" vs. "unofficial" distinction owes itself to Kenzer & Company's complicated legal history with Wizards of the Coast. During the 3/3.5e era, Kenzer had a licence to produce D&D material using the KoK campaign setting, branded with the WotC logo (stating "official licensed product"). Kenzer made a lot of these books, mostly in the 2001-2003 period; the 3.5 revision came out in the middle of 2003, and so the latest of those "official licensed products" indicate use of the 3.5 revision in their text.
The original KoK: Player's Guide, however, was published in 2002, before the 3.5 revision, and an updated version wasn't released during that period. KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands came out much later in 2006, does not bear the official WotC licensed product brand, and in fact takes care to note that it does not contain any material reprinted from other D&D sources, unlike its predecessor. It seems that by the time Kenzer wanted to print the 3.5 update for the Player's Guide they had abandoned or terminated the licence for some reason, so Kenzer simply published material in such a way that they figured they were legally in the clear without using WotC's copyrights (Kenzer has a lot of form for this, having previously published unlicensed KoK supplements for AD&D and going on to publish material for 4e without conforming to 4e's GSL).
The takeaway is that the original version of the feat as printed in the KoK: Player's Guide is technically from an official Wizards of the Coast 3e product, albeit only via licensing and written/published by a third party. The 3.5e revision from KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands is not, so for a table that cares about whether or not books have the WotC brand, the 3.5e version isn't official. It was, however, all written and published by the same company and the same people, who actually own the Kalamar setting.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wait are you saying that KoK isn't actual d&d material? And what I gather is that the version that just doesn't allow for saves is technically a 3e feat and the version that adds +10 to the DC is an "unofficial" 3.5 revision?
$endgroup$
– Raven Jovan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RavenJovan I did a bit of research and have expanded the answer to hopefully clarify the matter.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147617%2fis-there-an-errata-that-changes-the-effect-of-the-irresistible-spell-metamagic-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The feat was printed in its altered form in KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Realms
A bit of googling turned up this post in a GiTP thread where the mystery is helpfully explained by user ZamielVanWeber:
Here is the tale: Irresistible Spell was printed in the WotC official Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Handbook as is. There are 3 errata filed to that book, none of which mention any change. However, in the unofficial 3.5 update to the KoK Player's Handbook called Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands irresistible spell was changed to +10 to the save DC.
And indeed, on digging up a copy of the Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands, it features the altered version of Irresistible Spell. The short description in the feats table still states it allows the caster to "forbid saving throws" (as can be seen in the free preview of the book), but its descriptive entry in the full text only has it add +10 to the DC.
What makes it "unofficial"?
The "official" vs. "unofficial" distinction owes itself to Kenzer & Company's complicated legal history with Wizards of the Coast. During the 3/3.5e era, Kenzer had a licence to produce D&D material using the KoK campaign setting, branded with the WotC logo (stating "official licensed product"). Kenzer made a lot of these books, mostly in the 2001-2003 period; the 3.5 revision came out in the middle of 2003, and so the latest of those "official licensed products" indicate use of the 3.5 revision in their text.
The original KoK: Player's Guide, however, was published in 2002, before the 3.5 revision, and an updated version wasn't released during that period. KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands came out much later in 2006, does not bear the official WotC licensed product brand, and in fact takes care to note that it does not contain any material reprinted from other D&D sources, unlike its predecessor. It seems that by the time Kenzer wanted to print the 3.5 update for the Player's Guide they had abandoned or terminated the licence for some reason, so Kenzer simply published material in such a way that they figured they were legally in the clear without using WotC's copyrights (Kenzer has a lot of form for this, having previously published unlicensed KoK supplements for AD&D and going on to publish material for 4e without conforming to 4e's GSL).
The takeaway is that the original version of the feat as printed in the KoK: Player's Guide is technically from an official Wizards of the Coast 3e product, albeit only via licensing and written/published by a third party. The 3.5e revision from KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands is not, so for a table that cares about whether or not books have the WotC brand, the 3.5e version isn't official. It was, however, all written and published by the same company and the same people, who actually own the Kalamar setting.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wait are you saying that KoK isn't actual d&d material? And what I gather is that the version that just doesn't allow for saves is technically a 3e feat and the version that adds +10 to the DC is an "unofficial" 3.5 revision?
$endgroup$
– Raven Jovan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RavenJovan I did a bit of research and have expanded the answer to hopefully clarify the matter.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The feat was printed in its altered form in KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Realms
A bit of googling turned up this post in a GiTP thread where the mystery is helpfully explained by user ZamielVanWeber:
Here is the tale: Irresistible Spell was printed in the WotC official Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Handbook as is. There are 3 errata filed to that book, none of which mention any change. However, in the unofficial 3.5 update to the KoK Player's Handbook called Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands irresistible spell was changed to +10 to the save DC.
And indeed, on digging up a copy of the Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands, it features the altered version of Irresistible Spell. The short description in the feats table still states it allows the caster to "forbid saving throws" (as can be seen in the free preview of the book), but its descriptive entry in the full text only has it add +10 to the DC.
What makes it "unofficial"?
The "official" vs. "unofficial" distinction owes itself to Kenzer & Company's complicated legal history with Wizards of the Coast. During the 3/3.5e era, Kenzer had a licence to produce D&D material using the KoK campaign setting, branded with the WotC logo (stating "official licensed product"). Kenzer made a lot of these books, mostly in the 2001-2003 period; the 3.5 revision came out in the middle of 2003, and so the latest of those "official licensed products" indicate use of the 3.5 revision in their text.
The original KoK: Player's Guide, however, was published in 2002, before the 3.5 revision, and an updated version wasn't released during that period. KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands came out much later in 2006, does not bear the official WotC licensed product brand, and in fact takes care to note that it does not contain any material reprinted from other D&D sources, unlike its predecessor. It seems that by the time Kenzer wanted to print the 3.5 update for the Player's Guide they had abandoned or terminated the licence for some reason, so Kenzer simply published material in such a way that they figured they were legally in the clear without using WotC's copyrights (Kenzer has a lot of form for this, having previously published unlicensed KoK supplements for AD&D and going on to publish material for 4e without conforming to 4e's GSL).
The takeaway is that the original version of the feat as printed in the KoK: Player's Guide is technically from an official Wizards of the Coast 3e product, albeit only via licensing and written/published by a third party. The 3.5e revision from KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands is not, so for a table that cares about whether or not books have the WotC brand, the 3.5e version isn't official. It was, however, all written and published by the same company and the same people, who actually own the Kalamar setting.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wait are you saying that KoK isn't actual d&d material? And what I gather is that the version that just doesn't allow for saves is technically a 3e feat and the version that adds +10 to the DC is an "unofficial" 3.5 revision?
$endgroup$
– Raven Jovan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RavenJovan I did a bit of research and have expanded the answer to hopefully clarify the matter.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The feat was printed in its altered form in KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Realms
A bit of googling turned up this post in a GiTP thread where the mystery is helpfully explained by user ZamielVanWeber:
Here is the tale: Irresistible Spell was printed in the WotC official Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Handbook as is. There are 3 errata filed to that book, none of which mention any change. However, in the unofficial 3.5 update to the KoK Player's Handbook called Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands irresistible spell was changed to +10 to the save DC.
And indeed, on digging up a copy of the Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands, it features the altered version of Irresistible Spell. The short description in the feats table still states it allows the caster to "forbid saving throws" (as can be seen in the free preview of the book), but its descriptive entry in the full text only has it add +10 to the DC.
What makes it "unofficial"?
The "official" vs. "unofficial" distinction owes itself to Kenzer & Company's complicated legal history with Wizards of the Coast. During the 3/3.5e era, Kenzer had a licence to produce D&D material using the KoK campaign setting, branded with the WotC logo (stating "official licensed product"). Kenzer made a lot of these books, mostly in the 2001-2003 period; the 3.5 revision came out in the middle of 2003, and so the latest of those "official licensed products" indicate use of the 3.5 revision in their text.
The original KoK: Player's Guide, however, was published in 2002, before the 3.5 revision, and an updated version wasn't released during that period. KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands came out much later in 2006, does not bear the official WotC licensed product brand, and in fact takes care to note that it does not contain any material reprinted from other D&D sources, unlike its predecessor. It seems that by the time Kenzer wanted to print the 3.5 update for the Player's Guide they had abandoned or terminated the licence for some reason, so Kenzer simply published material in such a way that they figured they were legally in the clear without using WotC's copyrights (Kenzer has a lot of form for this, having previously published unlicensed KoK supplements for AD&D and going on to publish material for 4e without conforming to 4e's GSL).
The takeaway is that the original version of the feat as printed in the KoK: Player's Guide is technically from an official Wizards of the Coast 3e product, albeit only via licensing and written/published by a third party. The 3.5e revision from KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands is not, so for a table that cares about whether or not books have the WotC brand, the 3.5e version isn't official. It was, however, all written and published by the same company and the same people, who actually own the Kalamar setting.
$endgroup$
The feat was printed in its altered form in KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Realms
A bit of googling turned up this post in a GiTP thread where the mystery is helpfully explained by user ZamielVanWeber:
Here is the tale: Irresistible Spell was printed in the WotC official Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Handbook as is. There are 3 errata filed to that book, none of which mention any change. However, in the unofficial 3.5 update to the KoK Player's Handbook called Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands irresistible spell was changed to +10 to the save DC.
And indeed, on digging up a copy of the Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands, it features the altered version of Irresistible Spell. The short description in the feats table still states it allows the caster to "forbid saving throws" (as can be seen in the free preview of the book), but its descriptive entry in the full text only has it add +10 to the DC.
What makes it "unofficial"?
The "official" vs. "unofficial" distinction owes itself to Kenzer & Company's complicated legal history with Wizards of the Coast. During the 3/3.5e era, Kenzer had a licence to produce D&D material using the KoK campaign setting, branded with the WotC logo (stating "official licensed product"). Kenzer made a lot of these books, mostly in the 2001-2003 period; the 3.5 revision came out in the middle of 2003, and so the latest of those "official licensed products" indicate use of the 3.5 revision in their text.
The original KoK: Player's Guide, however, was published in 2002, before the 3.5 revision, and an updated version wasn't released during that period. KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands came out much later in 2006, does not bear the official WotC licensed product brand, and in fact takes care to note that it does not contain any material reprinted from other D&D sources, unlike its predecessor. It seems that by the time Kenzer wanted to print the 3.5 update for the Player's Guide they had abandoned or terminated the licence for some reason, so Kenzer simply published material in such a way that they figured they were legally in the clear without using WotC's copyrights (Kenzer has a lot of form for this, having previously published unlicensed KoK supplements for AD&D and going on to publish material for 4e without conforming to 4e's GSL).
The takeaway is that the original version of the feat as printed in the KoK: Player's Guide is technically from an official Wizards of the Coast 3e product, albeit only via licensing and written/published by a third party. The 3.5e revision from KoK: Player's Guide to the Sovereign Lands is not, so for a table that cares about whether or not books have the WotC brand, the 3.5e version isn't official. It was, however, all written and published by the same company and the same people, who actually own the Kalamar setting.
edited 2 days ago
answered May 8 at 8:18
CarcerCarcer
28.2k584148
28.2k584148
$begingroup$
Wait are you saying that KoK isn't actual d&d material? And what I gather is that the version that just doesn't allow for saves is technically a 3e feat and the version that adds +10 to the DC is an "unofficial" 3.5 revision?
$endgroup$
– Raven Jovan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RavenJovan I did a bit of research and have expanded the answer to hopefully clarify the matter.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wait are you saying that KoK isn't actual d&d material? And what I gather is that the version that just doesn't allow for saves is technically a 3e feat and the version that adds +10 to the DC is an "unofficial" 3.5 revision?
$endgroup$
– Raven Jovan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RavenJovan I did a bit of research and have expanded the answer to hopefully clarify the matter.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Wait are you saying that KoK isn't actual d&d material? And what I gather is that the version that just doesn't allow for saves is technically a 3e feat and the version that adds +10 to the DC is an "unofficial" 3.5 revision?
$endgroup$
– Raven Jovan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Wait are you saying that KoK isn't actual d&d material? And what I gather is that the version that just doesn't allow for saves is technically a 3e feat and the version that adds +10 to the DC is an "unofficial" 3.5 revision?
$endgroup$
– Raven Jovan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RavenJovan I did a bit of research and have expanded the answer to hopefully clarify the matter.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RavenJovan I did a bit of research and have expanded the answer to hopefully clarify the matter.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147617%2fis-there-an-errata-that-changes-the-effect-of-the-irresistible-spell-metamagic-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
FWIW, I've seen the same errata mentioned in other discussions of Irresistible Spell (like this one, for example).
$endgroup$
– Miniman
May 8 at 6:41