In “Avengers: Endgame”, what does the name Elmonzo refer to?Where to start in Marvel UnlimitedX-Men: Origin of the pronunciation of “Xavier”What comic books exist in the Marvel Movie Universe?Can Ultimate Toad spit mucus?Is Hulk classified as a hero or villain by the MCU writers?How does Zola end up like this in The Winter Soldier?Does Star-Lord ever go back to earth?Has Moon Knight been hinted at in the MCU?What relationship is there between the Tesseract in MCU and the mathematical object?Did Avengers: Endgame break its own rules?

Align a table column at a specific symbol

How could a civilization detect tachyons?

My parents are Afghan

Opposite party turned away from voting when ballot is all opposing party

When was it publicly revealed that a KH-11 spy satellite took pictures of the first Shuttle flight?

What is the Ancient One's mistake?

How to start your Starctaft II games vs AI immediatly?

Magical Modulo Squares

Why does this pattern in powers happen?

Was Mohammed the most popular first name for boys born in Berlin in 2018?

How do I minimise waste on a flight?

Should one save up to purchase a house/condo or maximize their 401k first?

What is the oldest instrument ever?

When an electron around an atom drops to a lower state, is 100% of the energy converted to a photon?

Do these creatures from the Tomb of Annihilation campaign speak Common?

How would an instant or sorcery with an effect that targets work with Feather?

Whose birthyears are canonically established in the MCU?

logo selection for poster presentation

Is this strange Morse signal type common?

What are my options legally if NYC company is not paying salary?

Can radiation block all wireless communications?

Company stopped paying my salary. What are my options?

Examples where existence is harder than evaluation

Why is there a cap on 401k contributions?



In “Avengers: Endgame”, what does the name Elmonzo refer to?


Where to start in Marvel UnlimitedX-Men: Origin of the pronunciation of “Xavier”What comic books exist in the Marvel Movie Universe?Can Ultimate Toad spit mucus?Is Hulk classified as a hero or villain by the MCU writers?How does Zola end up like this in The Winter Soldier?Does Star-Lord ever go back to earth?Has Moon Knight been hinted at in the MCU?What relationship is there between the Tesseract in MCU and the mathematical object?Did Avengers: Endgame break its own rules?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








44















In the film, when Tony




asks Howard if he has thought of any names for his kid, to which Howard replies that they have though about "Elmonzo".




I do not seem to recall having ever read this anywhere.



My question: Is this a reference to something from the comics, or some sort of out-of-universe Easter egg? Do we have any leads on this?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)

    – Fabian Röling
    May 4 at 19:55







  • 14





    @FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.

    – Valorum
    May 4 at 20:08






  • 1





    @Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.

    – The Great Duck
    yesterday







  • 1





    I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    @Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.

    – Stark07
    19 hours ago

















44















In the film, when Tony




asks Howard if he has thought of any names for his kid, to which Howard replies that they have though about "Elmonzo".




I do not seem to recall having ever read this anywhere.



My question: Is this a reference to something from the comics, or some sort of out-of-universe Easter egg? Do we have any leads on this?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)

    – Fabian Röling
    May 4 at 19:55







  • 14





    @FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.

    – Valorum
    May 4 at 20:08






  • 1





    @Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.

    – The Great Duck
    yesterday







  • 1





    I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    @Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.

    – Stark07
    19 hours ago













44












44








44


1






In the film, when Tony




asks Howard if he has thought of any names for his kid, to which Howard replies that they have though about "Elmonzo".




I do not seem to recall having ever read this anywhere.



My question: Is this a reference to something from the comics, or some sort of out-of-universe Easter egg? Do we have any leads on this?










share|improve this question
















In the film, when Tony




asks Howard if he has thought of any names for his kid, to which Howard replies that they have though about "Elmonzo".




I do not seem to recall having ever read this anywhere.



My question: Is this a reference to something from the comics, or some sort of out-of-universe Easter egg? Do we have any leads on this?







marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Steven M. Vascellaro

2,46951952




2,46951952










asked May 4 at 16:48









Stark07Stark07

11.8k753101




11.8k753101







  • 2





    It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)

    – Fabian Röling
    May 4 at 19:55







  • 14





    @FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.

    – Valorum
    May 4 at 20:08






  • 1





    @Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.

    – The Great Duck
    yesterday







  • 1





    I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    @Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.

    – Stark07
    19 hours ago












  • 2





    It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)

    – Fabian Röling
    May 4 at 19:55







  • 14





    @FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.

    – Valorum
    May 4 at 20:08






  • 1





    @Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.

    – The Great Duck
    yesterday







  • 1





    I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    @Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.

    – Stark07
    19 hours ago







2




2





It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)

– Fabian Röling
May 4 at 19:55






It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)

– Fabian Röling
May 4 at 19:55





14




14





@FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.

– Valorum
May 4 at 20:08





@FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.

– Valorum
May 4 at 20:08




1




1





@Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.

– The Great Duck
yesterday






@Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.

– The Great Duck
yesterday





1




1





I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer

– Valorum
yesterday






I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer

– Valorum
yesterday





1




1





@Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.

– Stark07
19 hours ago





@Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.

– Stark07
19 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















78














He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.



The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.




Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.



Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.



Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name







share|improve this answer




















  • 5





    Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).

    – mattdm
    yesterday











  • I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )

    – Jessica
    yesterday












  • There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense

    – Huangism
    yesterday











  • @Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.

    – Valorum
    yesterday


















7














Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):




Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?



Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.



Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.




It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.



The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".



Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.



Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.



So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.



Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • "it's a funny name" - Citation needed.

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.

    – mattdm
    yesterday






  • 1





    And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.

    – mattdm
    yesterday











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211662%2fin-avengers-endgame-what-does-the-name-elmonzo-refer-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









78














He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.



The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.




Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.



Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.



Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name







share|improve this answer




















  • 5





    Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).

    – mattdm
    yesterday











  • I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )

    – Jessica
    yesterday












  • There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense

    – Huangism
    yesterday











  • @Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.

    – Valorum
    yesterday















78














He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.



The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.




Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.



Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.



Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name







share|improve this answer




















  • 5





    Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).

    – mattdm
    yesterday











  • I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )

    – Jessica
    yesterday












  • There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense

    – Huangism
    yesterday











  • @Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.

    – Valorum
    yesterday













78












78








78







He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.



The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.




Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.



Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.



Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name







share|improve this answer















He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.



The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.




Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.



Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.



Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 4 at 17:17

























answered May 4 at 17:05









ValorumValorum

420k11530613284




420k11530613284







  • 5





    Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).

    – mattdm
    yesterday











  • I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )

    – Jessica
    yesterday












  • There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense

    – Huangism
    yesterday











  • @Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.

    – Valorum
    yesterday












  • 5





    Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).

    – mattdm
    yesterday











  • I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )

    – Jessica
    yesterday












  • There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense

    – Huangism
    yesterday











  • @Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.

    – Valorum
    yesterday







5




5





Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).

– mattdm
yesterday





Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).

– mattdm
yesterday













I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )

– Jessica
yesterday






I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )

– Jessica
yesterday














There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense

– Huangism
yesterday





There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense

– Huangism
yesterday













@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.

– Valorum
yesterday





@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.

– Valorum
yesterday













7














Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):




Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?



Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.



Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.




It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.



The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".



Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.



Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.



So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.



Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • "it's a funny name" - Citation needed.

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.

    – mattdm
    yesterday






  • 1





    And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.

    – mattdm
    yesterday















7














Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):




Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?



Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.



Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.




It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.



The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".



Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.



Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.



So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.



Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • "it's a funny name" - Citation needed.

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.

    – mattdm
    yesterday






  • 1





    And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.

    – mattdm
    yesterday













7












7








7







Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):




Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?



Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.



Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.




It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.



The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".



Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.



Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.



So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.



Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".






share|improve this answer















Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):




Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?



Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.



Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.




It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.



The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".



Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.



Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.



So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.



Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered 2 days ago









mattdmmattdm

723717




723717







  • 3





    Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • "it's a funny name" - Citation needed.

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.

    – mattdm
    yesterday






  • 1





    And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.

    – mattdm
    yesterday












  • 3





    Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Rand al'Thor
    yesterday











  • "it's a funny name" - Citation needed.

    – Valorum
    yesterday







  • 1





    Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.

    – mattdm
    yesterday






  • 1





    And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.

    – mattdm
    yesterday







3




3





Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)

– Rand al'Thor
yesterday





Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)

– Rand al'Thor
yesterday













Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– Rand al'Thor
yesterday





Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– Rand al'Thor
yesterday













"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.

– Valorum
yesterday






"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.

– Valorum
yesterday





1




1





Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.

– mattdm
yesterday





Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.

– mattdm
yesterday




1




1





And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.

– mattdm
yesterday





And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.

– mattdm
yesterday

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211662%2fin-avengers-endgame-what-does-the-name-elmonzo-refer-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Grendel Contents Story Scholarship Depictions Notes References Navigation menu10.1093/notesj/gjn112Berserkeree

Area configuration aggregation error after install Porto themeMagento 2.1 CE Installed but front/backend not loading/workingCSS not loading on page within Magento 2 pageCannot install module in Magento 2no commands defined in the “setup” namespace. in Magento2Magento 2: Static files are present but shows 404Why do i have to always run the commands to clean cache in Magento 2.1.8?Failure reason: 'Unable to unserialize value.'Error 500 after magento migrationIn production mode the site does not loadMagento 2 : Error 500 after installing

Middle Expansion Olielle Resaix Definition: Uttering songs of triumph shouting with joy triumphant exulting Sejunction Journal 붙다 달 고급 품목 외출 The stretch trades the screeching tin. Definition: The act of speaking with a drawl a drawl Cough Sand Definition: An uproar a quarrel a noisy outbreak Shake Iron Publicize Horse House Baby 사과 Resaix Flaggy Jelly Temporary Unequaled Puppet A drop in the bucket Shrew 성격 회원 성질 미팅 The burn frames the tacky quality. Materialistic The smoke reduces the way. Yammoe Nondescript Cheek 얼굴 배 약하다 날리다 타다 The illegal country shows the iron. Help Rule Drearien Smoke Teaching Meaty Wasp Abraham Lincoln Jaws 진심 수리하다 Size Cork Idea Convert Think Lark John Lennon 거울 청소 군 추천하다 아이스크림