In “Avengers: Endgame”, what does the name Elmonzo refer to?Where to start in Marvel UnlimitedX-Men: Origin of the pronunciation of “Xavier”What comic books exist in the Marvel Movie Universe?Can Ultimate Toad spit mucus?Is Hulk classified as a hero or villain by the MCU writers?How does Zola end up like this in The Winter Soldier?Does Star-Lord ever go back to earth?Has Moon Knight been hinted at in the MCU?What relationship is there between the Tesseract in MCU and the mathematical object?Did Avengers: Endgame break its own rules?
Align a table column at a specific symbol
How could a civilization detect tachyons?
My parents are Afghan
Opposite party turned away from voting when ballot is all opposing party
When was it publicly revealed that a KH-11 spy satellite took pictures of the first Shuttle flight?
What is the Ancient One's mistake?
How to start your Starctaft II games vs AI immediatly?
Magical Modulo Squares
Why does this pattern in powers happen?
Was Mohammed the most popular first name for boys born in Berlin in 2018?
How do I minimise waste on a flight?
Should one save up to purchase a house/condo or maximize their 401k first?
What is the oldest instrument ever?
When an electron around an atom drops to a lower state, is 100% of the energy converted to a photon?
Do these creatures from the Tomb of Annihilation campaign speak Common?
How would an instant or sorcery with an effect that targets work with Feather?
Whose birthyears are canonically established in the MCU?
logo selection for poster presentation
Is this strange Morse signal type common?
What are my options legally if NYC company is not paying salary?
Can radiation block all wireless communications?
Company stopped paying my salary. What are my options?
Examples where existence is harder than evaluation
Why is there a cap on 401k contributions?
In “Avengers: Endgame”, what does the name Elmonzo refer to?
Where to start in Marvel UnlimitedX-Men: Origin of the pronunciation of “Xavier”What comic books exist in the Marvel Movie Universe?Can Ultimate Toad spit mucus?Is Hulk classified as a hero or villain by the MCU writers?How does Zola end up like this in The Winter Soldier?Does Star-Lord ever go back to earth?Has Moon Knight been hinted at in the MCU?What relationship is there between the Tesseract in MCU and the mathematical object?Did Avengers: Endgame break its own rules?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
In the film, when Tony
asks Howard if he has thought of any names for his kid, to which Howard replies that they have though about "Elmonzo".
I do not seem to recall having ever read this anywhere.
My question: Is this a reference to something from the comics, or some sort of out-of-universe Easter egg? Do we have any leads on this?
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
|
show 4 more comments
In the film, when Tony
asks Howard if he has thought of any names for his kid, to which Howard replies that they have though about "Elmonzo".
I do not seem to recall having ever read this anywhere.
My question: Is this a reference to something from the comics, or some sort of out-of-universe Easter egg? Do we have any leads on this?
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
2
It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)
– Fabian Röling
May 4 at 19:55
14
@FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.
– Valorum
May 4 at 20:08
1
@Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.
– The Great Duck
yesterday
1
I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer
– Valorum
yesterday
1
@Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.
– Stark07
19 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
In the film, when Tony
asks Howard if he has thought of any names for his kid, to which Howard replies that they have though about "Elmonzo".
I do not seem to recall having ever read this anywhere.
My question: Is this a reference to something from the comics, or some sort of out-of-universe Easter egg? Do we have any leads on this?
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
In the film, when Tony
asks Howard if he has thought of any names for his kid, to which Howard replies that they have though about "Elmonzo".
I do not seem to recall having ever read this anywhere.
My question: Is this a reference to something from the comics, or some sort of out-of-universe Easter egg? Do we have any leads on this?
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
edited 7 hours ago
Steven M. Vascellaro
2,46951952
2,46951952
asked May 4 at 16:48
Stark07Stark07
11.8k753101
11.8k753101
2
It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)
– Fabian Röling
May 4 at 19:55
14
@FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.
– Valorum
May 4 at 20:08
1
@Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.
– The Great Duck
yesterday
1
I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer
– Valorum
yesterday
1
@Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.
– Stark07
19 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
2
It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)
– Fabian Röling
May 4 at 19:55
14
@FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.
– Valorum
May 4 at 20:08
1
@Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.
– The Great Duck
yesterday
1
I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer
– Valorum
yesterday
1
@Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.
– Stark07
19 hours ago
2
2
It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)
– Fabian Röling
May 4 at 19:55
It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)
– Fabian Röling
May 4 at 19:55
14
14
@FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.
– Valorum
May 4 at 20:08
@FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.
– Valorum
May 4 at 20:08
1
1
@Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.
– The Great Duck
yesterday
@Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.
– The Great Duck
yesterday
1
1
I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer
– Valorum
yesterday
I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer
– Valorum
yesterday
1
1
@Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.
– Stark07
19 hours ago
@Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.
– Stark07
19 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.
The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.
Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.
Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.
Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name
5
Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).
– mattdm
yesterday
I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )
– Jessica
yesterday
There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense
– Huangism
yesterday
@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.
– Valorum
yesterday
add a comment |
Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):
Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?
Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.
Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.
It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.
The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".
Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.
Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.
So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.
Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".
3
Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.
– Valorum
yesterday
1
Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.
– mattdm
yesterday
1
And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.
– mattdm
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211662%2fin-avengers-endgame-what-does-the-name-elmonzo-refer-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.
The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.
Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.
Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.
Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name
5
Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).
– mattdm
yesterday
I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )
– Jessica
yesterday
There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense
– Huangism
yesterday
@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.
– Valorum
yesterday
add a comment |
He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.
The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.
Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.
Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.
Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name
5
Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).
– mattdm
yesterday
I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )
– Jessica
yesterday
There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense
– Huangism
yesterday
@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.
– Valorum
yesterday
add a comment |
He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.
The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.
Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.
Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.
Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name
He doesn't say "Elmonzo", he says "Almanzo" which would indicate that his wife is likely a fan of the Little House on the Prairie books in which Almanzo Wilder was a major character.
The joke here is (I assume) that in The Long Winter, Almanzo and a character called Cap Garland go on an adventure together.
Two of her young neighbors, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland, became town heroes when they retrieved a cache of wheat for De Smet’s starving residents during a rare break in the storms.
Almanzo and Cap’s journey is the climax of The Long Winter, the sixth book in the classic autobiographical Little House series by Laura Ingalls Wilder.
Almanzo: The Origins of an Offbeat Pioneer Name
edited May 4 at 17:17
answered May 4 at 17:05
ValorumValorum
420k11530613284
420k11530613284
5
Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).
– mattdm
yesterday
I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )
– Jessica
yesterday
There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense
– Huangism
yesterday
@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.
– Valorum
yesterday
add a comment |
5
Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).
– mattdm
yesterday
I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )
– Jessica
yesterday
There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense
– Huangism
yesterday
@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.
– Valorum
yesterday
5
5
Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).
– mattdm
yesterday
Do you have any reference for this assumption? It's an interesting coincidence, but doesn't even really make sense as a joke (since they didn't pick this name).
– mattdm
yesterday
I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )
– Jessica
yesterday
I figured, too, it could be a reference to Almanzo Wilder, when I heard this line. Plus the Wilders were upstate NY farmers, kind of like Tony & Pepper homesteading upstate in the post Thanos 50% apocalypse era lol. I don’t recall Almanzo having a buddy named Cap in The Long Winter, but I read those books a few decades ago. ; )
– Jessica
yesterday
There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense
– Huangism
yesterday
There are also characters in the show which last name is Stark, so this answer absolutely makes perfect sense
– Huangism
yesterday
@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.
– Valorum
yesterday
@Huangism - Tony's trip to the past (1970) actually pre-dates the show (1974+) but you're not wrong. Mr Stark also appears in the book.
– Valorum
yesterday
add a comment |
Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):
Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?
Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.
Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.
It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.
The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".
Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.
Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.
So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.
Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".
3
Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.
– Valorum
yesterday
1
Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.
– mattdm
yesterday
1
And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.
– mattdm
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):
Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?
Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.
Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.
It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.
The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".
Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.
Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.
So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.
Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".
3
Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.
– Valorum
yesterday
1
Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.
– mattdm
yesterday
1
And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.
– mattdm
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):
Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?
Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.
Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.
It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.
The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".
Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.
Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.
So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.
Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".
Here's the exchange (as transcribed at a movie quotes site):
Tony Stark: And so, where are you at with names?
Howard Stark: Well, if it’s a boy, my wife likes Almanzo.
Tony Stark: Huh. You might want to let that stew a while, you got time.
It is probably just a joke: the suggested name is close to Tony's real name (which is Anthony), but kind of funny-sounding because it is so uncommon. Tony asks that they think about that for a little bit — to "let something stew" is to allow it some more time to be fully developed. Presumably that's what happens, ending up with his actual name.
The Little House on the Prairie answer is interesting, but is just speculation with no citation. Yes, that's the most widely popular example of this uncommon name, but there's no indication that anything is meant by it other than "odd sounding name that is not too far off from the actual name".
Any deep connection to other characters, setting, or plot does not really make any sense, because they didn't pick that name — if the joke were "name that isn't quite right ➡ name that is right and has a clever connection", that might make sense. But here we have "name that (maybe) has a clever connection ➡ name that is right and has no such connection". That isn't very satisfying. And Tony's reply doesn't relate to Little House either; it makes much more sense if it's just a simple "odd name, not quite right" joke.
Furthermore, there are no other big references to Little House in the MCU. If this were a clever easter egg, it seems like there'd be at least some other reference to it or joke — that's something the MCU clearly does like to do.
So, there may not be deep significance. Sure, as a comment says, there's no accidents in a production of this scale — but it also doesn't mean every bit that matches some interesting coincidence is that coincidence. We surely could come up with even more far-fetched possible references if we wanted to, but there doesn't really seem to be a reason to.
Maybe that's not as exciting as the other answer, but without any references to insight from writers, actors, or directors, Occam's Razor suggests the simplest explanation is probably the best one. And that's "that funny name is almost but not quite right".
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
mattdmmattdm
723717
723717
3
Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.
– Valorum
yesterday
1
Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.
– mattdm
yesterday
1
And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.
– mattdm
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
3
Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.
– Valorum
yesterday
1
Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.
– mattdm
yesterday
1
And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.
– mattdm
yesterday
3
3
Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
Undeleted. This may not be the right answer, but it's an answer. If you disagree with it, downvote it, but don't use delete votes as super-downvotes. (In other circumstances, "there is no significance to this throwaway line" would be the correct answer. Certainly that general form of answer can be valid, even if not always correct.)
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Rand al'Thor♦
yesterday
"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.
– Valorum
yesterday
"it's a funny name" - Citation needed.
– Valorum
yesterday
1
1
Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.
– mattdm
yesterday
Also, I think your data source is suspect. Note that there is "no data" for any of the other years for Almanzo.
– mattdm
yesterday
1
1
And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.
– mattdm
yesterday
And the years which would really be of interest are: 1969/1970, when the name was being considered in the fiction, or 2019, when the joke is actually made.
– mattdm
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211662%2fin-avengers-endgame-what-does-the-name-elmonzo-refer-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
It's probably just chosen as a particularly bad sounding name. (Oh no, lots of Elmonzos will now hate me.)
– Fabian Röling
May 4 at 19:55
14
@FabianRöling - In a film that costs $200M to make and gets edited for years before seeing the light of day, there are no coincidences or unintentional lines.
– Valorum
May 4 at 20:08
1
@Valorum but by the same reasoning not everything has to have a double meaning or reference behind it.
– The Great Duck
yesterday
1
I've rolled it back (again). It's considered bad form to invalidate an existing answer with an edit to the question, especially one that's based on the answer
– Valorum
yesterday
1
@Valorum - Your answer would've been "invalidated" if I had made a fundamental change to the question. I merely fixed a word I had misheard. I would have preferred for it to be more accurate. But if you deem it "bad form", so be it.
– Stark07
19 hours ago