Finding unpaired number in an odd Array of integersFind two unique integers in sorted arrayFinding all integers in an array with odd occurrenceRotate an array to the right by a given number of stepsFinding an equilibrium index in an int arrayFind balanced arrayCyclic RotationDetermining the cardinality of sets defined by recursively following indexesGCD of several integersCodility cyclic rotation solution in PHPFind value that occurs in odd number of elements

What is the German equivalent of the proverb 水清ければ魚棲まず (if the water is clear, fish won't live there)?

Complexity of verifying optimality in (mixed) integer programming

If you inherit a Roth 401(k), is it taxed?

Is it safe if the neutral lead is exposed and disconnected?

A variant of the Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem

Why does aggregate initialization not work anymore since C++20 if a constructor is explicitly defaulted or deleted?

What is a good example for artistic ND filter applications?

Why would an invisible personal shield be necessary?

Accidentally deleted everything from a directory on my Macbook using terminal

How to store my pliers and wire cutters on my desk?

Would people understand me speaking German all over Europe?

How to innovate in OR

What is the reason for cards stating "Until end of turn, you don't lose this mana as steps and phases end"?

Can a US President, after impeachment and removal, be re-elected or re-appointed?

Why were contact sensors put on three of the Lunar Module's four legs? Did they ever bend and stick out sideways?

Is it okay for me to decline a project on ethical grounds?

Why does the Eurostar not show youth pricing?

Was the Psych theme song written for the show?

Why does the Rust compiler not optimize code assuming that two mutable references cannot alias?

What are the cons of stateless password generators?

Can Papyrus be folded?

Why was the LRV's speed gauge displaying metric units?

How to efficiently shred a lot of cabbage?

Piece of chess engine, which accomplishes move generation



Finding unpaired number in an odd Array of integers


Find two unique integers in sorted arrayFinding all integers in an array with odd occurrenceRotate an array to the right by a given number of stepsFinding an equilibrium index in an int arrayFind balanced arrayCyclic RotationDetermining the cardinality of sets defined by recursively following indexesGCD of several integersCodility cyclic rotation solution in PHPFind value that occurs in odd number of elements






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$



A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired.



For example, in array A such that:



A[0] = 9 A[1] = 3 A[2] = 9
A[3] = 3 A[4] = 9 A[5] = 7
A[6] = 9
the elements at indexes 0 and 2 have value 9,
the elements at indexes 1 and 3 have value 3,
the elements at indexes 4 and 6 have value 9,
the element at index 5 has value 7 and is unpaired.




class Solution 

public int solution(int[] A)

final int len = A.length;

Arrays.sort(A);

for (int i = 0; i < len ;)
int counter = 1;
int current = A[i];

while ((i < len - 1) && (current == A[++i]))
counter++;


if (counter % 2 == 1)
return current;


return -1;




Could this code be bettered in terms of time complexity of code quality?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$



    A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired.



    For example, in array A such that:



    A[0] = 9 A[1] = 3 A[2] = 9
    A[3] = 3 A[4] = 9 A[5] = 7
    A[6] = 9
    the elements at indexes 0 and 2 have value 9,
    the elements at indexes 1 and 3 have value 3,
    the elements at indexes 4 and 6 have value 9,
    the element at index 5 has value 7 and is unpaired.




    class Solution 

    public int solution(int[] A)

    final int len = A.length;

    Arrays.sort(A);

    for (int i = 0; i < len ;)
    int counter = 1;
    int current = A[i];

    while ((i < len - 1) && (current == A[++i]))
    counter++;


    if (counter % 2 == 1)
    return current;


    return -1;




    Could this code be bettered in terms of time complexity of code quality?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$



      A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired.



      For example, in array A such that:



      A[0] = 9 A[1] = 3 A[2] = 9
      A[3] = 3 A[4] = 9 A[5] = 7
      A[6] = 9
      the elements at indexes 0 and 2 have value 9,
      the elements at indexes 1 and 3 have value 3,
      the elements at indexes 4 and 6 have value 9,
      the element at index 5 has value 7 and is unpaired.




      class Solution 

      public int solution(int[] A)

      final int len = A.length;

      Arrays.sort(A);

      for (int i = 0; i < len ;)
      int counter = 1;
      int current = A[i];

      while ((i < len - 1) && (current == A[++i]))
      counter++;


      if (counter % 2 == 1)
      return current;


      return -1;




      Could this code be bettered in terms of time complexity of code quality?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired.



      For example, in array A such that:



      A[0] = 9 A[1] = 3 A[2] = 9
      A[3] = 3 A[4] = 9 A[5] = 7
      A[6] = 9
      the elements at indexes 0 and 2 have value 9,
      the elements at indexes 1 and 3 have value 3,
      the elements at indexes 4 and 6 have value 9,
      the element at index 5 has value 7 and is unpaired.




      class Solution 

      public int solution(int[] A)

      final int len = A.length;

      Arrays.sort(A);

      for (int i = 0; i < len ;)
      int counter = 1;
      int current = A[i];

      while ((i < len - 1) && (current == A[++i]))
      counter++;


      if (counter % 2 == 1)
      return current;


      return -1;




      Could this code be bettered in terms of time complexity of code quality?







      java array complexity






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jul 19 at 20:11









      Linny

      1,4522 gold badges9 silver badges28 bronze badges




      1,4522 gold badges9 silver badges28 bronze badges










      asked Jul 19 at 20:06









      AnirudhAnirudh

      4542 gold badges9 silver badges24 bronze badges




      4542 gold badges9 silver badges24 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Sorting of the array will take O(n (log n)) in the average case. You can do it in linear time using bitwise operation



          public class Test 
          public static void main()
          int a = 0;
          int[] arr = 9,3,9,3,9,7,9;

          for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ )
          a = a ^ arr[i];


          System.out.println(a);




          Any number which will XOR with 0 will be the number itself. But if it will XOR with itself, it will be 0. In the end, we'll get the non paired number.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Nice. One drawback is that this method will always return a result, even if the array is empty, if it contains no single integer or if it contains multiple unpaired int.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 20 at 8:13










          • $begingroup$
            It's possible to use a stream and reduce for a relatively clean one-liner. As a bonus, it fails with an empty array.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 20 at 8:24










          • $begingroup$
            @EricDuminil, Here are the requirements from the original question - "A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired". Moreover, we don't need to run the loop if the array is empty. Easy to code a one-line condition.
            $endgroup$
            – Vikas
            Jul 22 at 22:18










          • $begingroup$
            sure, the above specs say so. It doesn't hurt to try to make the method more reliable, though.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 23 at 5:06


















          3












          $begingroup$

          • Regarding time complexity. If you use an additional array, you can make only one passage through the array (not doing sorting) and have time complexity O(N), where N - the number of elements in the array. Currently, it's O(NlogN) because of sorting.


          • Currently looks like if your method returns -1, it means that you have an even number of elements in the array (Invalid input?) So maybe you should throw some Exception such as IllegalArgumentException in this case? Moreover, what if you have elements with value -1 in your array?


          • You should simplify your loops. You have nested loop structure, however, you can have only one since you traverse the array only once. Currently, because of 2 loop structures, it takes some time to understand what's going on, where you increment your i variable, what is the stop condition, etc.


          Minor comments



          • Do not start your variable names with a capital letter (A). This convention is reserved for classes.

          Edit



          Now it came to my mind that you can solve this task with one passage (in O(N)) without an additional array.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$

















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "196"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f224501%2ffinding-unpaired-number-in-an-odd-array-of-integers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Sorting of the array will take O(n (log n)) in the average case. You can do it in linear time using bitwise operation



            public class Test 
            public static void main()
            int a = 0;
            int[] arr = 9,3,9,3,9,7,9;

            for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ )
            a = a ^ arr[i];


            System.out.println(a);




            Any number which will XOR with 0 will be the number itself. But if it will XOR with itself, it will be 0. In the end, we'll get the non paired number.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nice. One drawback is that this method will always return a result, even if the array is empty, if it contains no single integer or if it contains multiple unpaired int.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 20 at 8:13










            • $begingroup$
              It's possible to use a stream and reduce for a relatively clean one-liner. As a bonus, it fails with an empty array.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 20 at 8:24










            • $begingroup$
              @EricDuminil, Here are the requirements from the original question - "A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired". Moreover, we don't need to run the loop if the array is empty. Easy to code a one-line condition.
              $endgroup$
              – Vikas
              Jul 22 at 22:18










            • $begingroup$
              sure, the above specs say so. It doesn't hurt to try to make the method more reliable, though.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 23 at 5:06















            3












            $begingroup$

            Sorting of the array will take O(n (log n)) in the average case. You can do it in linear time using bitwise operation



            public class Test 
            public static void main()
            int a = 0;
            int[] arr = 9,3,9,3,9,7,9;

            for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ )
            a = a ^ arr[i];


            System.out.println(a);




            Any number which will XOR with 0 will be the number itself. But if it will XOR with itself, it will be 0. In the end, we'll get the non paired number.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nice. One drawback is that this method will always return a result, even if the array is empty, if it contains no single integer or if it contains multiple unpaired int.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 20 at 8:13










            • $begingroup$
              It's possible to use a stream and reduce for a relatively clean one-liner. As a bonus, it fails with an empty array.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 20 at 8:24










            • $begingroup$
              @EricDuminil, Here are the requirements from the original question - "A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired". Moreover, we don't need to run the loop if the array is empty. Easy to code a one-line condition.
              $endgroup$
              – Vikas
              Jul 22 at 22:18










            • $begingroup$
              sure, the above specs say so. It doesn't hurt to try to make the method more reliable, though.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 23 at 5:06













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Sorting of the array will take O(n (log n)) in the average case. You can do it in linear time using bitwise operation



            public class Test 
            public static void main()
            int a = 0;
            int[] arr = 9,3,9,3,9,7,9;

            for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ )
            a = a ^ arr[i];


            System.out.println(a);




            Any number which will XOR with 0 will be the number itself. But if it will XOR with itself, it will be 0. In the end, we'll get the non paired number.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Sorting of the array will take O(n (log n)) in the average case. You can do it in linear time using bitwise operation



            public class Test 
            public static void main()
            int a = 0;
            int[] arr = 9,3,9,3,9,7,9;

            for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ )
            a = a ^ arr[i];


            System.out.println(a);




            Any number which will XOR with 0 will be the number itself. But if it will XOR with itself, it will be 0. In the end, we'll get the non paired number.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jul 20 at 0:59









            VikasVikas

            461 bronze badge




            461 bronze badge










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nice. One drawback is that this method will always return a result, even if the array is empty, if it contains no single integer or if it contains multiple unpaired int.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 20 at 8:13










            • $begingroup$
              It's possible to use a stream and reduce for a relatively clean one-liner. As a bonus, it fails with an empty array.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 20 at 8:24










            • $begingroup$
              @EricDuminil, Here are the requirements from the original question - "A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired". Moreover, we don't need to run the loop if the array is empty. Easy to code a one-line condition.
              $endgroup$
              – Vikas
              Jul 22 at 22:18










            • $begingroup$
              sure, the above specs say so. It doesn't hurt to try to make the method more reliable, though.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 23 at 5:06












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nice. One drawback is that this method will always return a result, even if the array is empty, if it contains no single integer or if it contains multiple unpaired int.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 20 at 8:13










            • $begingroup$
              It's possible to use a stream and reduce for a relatively clean one-liner. As a bonus, it fails with an empty array.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 20 at 8:24










            • $begingroup$
              @EricDuminil, Here are the requirements from the original question - "A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired". Moreover, we don't need to run the loop if the array is empty. Easy to code a one-line condition.
              $endgroup$
              – Vikas
              Jul 22 at 22:18










            • $begingroup$
              sure, the above specs say so. It doesn't hurt to try to make the method more reliable, though.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Duminil
              Jul 23 at 5:06







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Nice. One drawback is that this method will always return a result, even if the array is empty, if it contains no single integer or if it contains multiple unpaired int.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 20 at 8:13




            $begingroup$
            Nice. One drawback is that this method will always return a result, even if the array is empty, if it contains no single integer or if it contains multiple unpaired int.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 20 at 8:13












            $begingroup$
            It's possible to use a stream and reduce for a relatively clean one-liner. As a bonus, it fails with an empty array.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 20 at 8:24




            $begingroup$
            It's possible to use a stream and reduce for a relatively clean one-liner. As a bonus, it fails with an empty array.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 20 at 8:24












            $begingroup$
            @EricDuminil, Here are the requirements from the original question - "A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired". Moreover, we don't need to run the loop if the array is empty. Easy to code a one-line condition.
            $endgroup$
            – Vikas
            Jul 22 at 22:18




            $begingroup$
            @EricDuminil, Here are the requirements from the original question - "A non-empty array A consisting of N integers is given. The array contains an odd number of elements, and each element of the array can be paired with another element that has the same value, except for one element that is left unpaired". Moreover, we don't need to run the loop if the array is empty. Easy to code a one-line condition.
            $endgroup$
            – Vikas
            Jul 22 at 22:18












            $begingroup$
            sure, the above specs say so. It doesn't hurt to try to make the method more reliable, though.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 23 at 5:06




            $begingroup$
            sure, the above specs say so. It doesn't hurt to try to make the method more reliable, though.
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Duminil
            Jul 23 at 5:06













            3












            $begingroup$

            • Regarding time complexity. If you use an additional array, you can make only one passage through the array (not doing sorting) and have time complexity O(N), where N - the number of elements in the array. Currently, it's O(NlogN) because of sorting.


            • Currently looks like if your method returns -1, it means that you have an even number of elements in the array (Invalid input?) So maybe you should throw some Exception such as IllegalArgumentException in this case? Moreover, what if you have elements with value -1 in your array?


            • You should simplify your loops. You have nested loop structure, however, you can have only one since you traverse the array only once. Currently, because of 2 loop structures, it takes some time to understand what's going on, where you increment your i variable, what is the stop condition, etc.


            Minor comments



            • Do not start your variable names with a capital letter (A). This convention is reserved for classes.

            Edit



            Now it came to my mind that you can solve this task with one passage (in O(N)) without an additional array.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



















              3












              $begingroup$

              • Regarding time complexity. If you use an additional array, you can make only one passage through the array (not doing sorting) and have time complexity O(N), where N - the number of elements in the array. Currently, it's O(NlogN) because of sorting.


              • Currently looks like if your method returns -1, it means that you have an even number of elements in the array (Invalid input?) So maybe you should throw some Exception such as IllegalArgumentException in this case? Moreover, what if you have elements with value -1 in your array?


              • You should simplify your loops. You have nested loop structure, however, you can have only one since you traverse the array only once. Currently, because of 2 loop structures, it takes some time to understand what's going on, where you increment your i variable, what is the stop condition, etc.


              Minor comments



              • Do not start your variable names with a capital letter (A). This convention is reserved for classes.

              Edit



              Now it came to my mind that you can solve this task with one passage (in O(N)) without an additional array.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                • Regarding time complexity. If you use an additional array, you can make only one passage through the array (not doing sorting) and have time complexity O(N), where N - the number of elements in the array. Currently, it's O(NlogN) because of sorting.


                • Currently looks like if your method returns -1, it means that you have an even number of elements in the array (Invalid input?) So maybe you should throw some Exception such as IllegalArgumentException in this case? Moreover, what if you have elements with value -1 in your array?


                • You should simplify your loops. You have nested loop structure, however, you can have only one since you traverse the array only once. Currently, because of 2 loop structures, it takes some time to understand what's going on, where you increment your i variable, what is the stop condition, etc.


                Minor comments



                • Do not start your variable names with a capital letter (A). This convention is reserved for classes.

                Edit



                Now it came to my mind that you can solve this task with one passage (in O(N)) without an additional array.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                • Regarding time complexity. If you use an additional array, you can make only one passage through the array (not doing sorting) and have time complexity O(N), where N - the number of elements in the array. Currently, it's O(NlogN) because of sorting.


                • Currently looks like if your method returns -1, it means that you have an even number of elements in the array (Invalid input?) So maybe you should throw some Exception such as IllegalArgumentException in this case? Moreover, what if you have elements with value -1 in your array?


                • You should simplify your loops. You have nested loop structure, however, you can have only one since you traverse the array only once. Currently, because of 2 loop structures, it takes some time to understand what's going on, where you increment your i variable, what is the stop condition, etc.


                Minor comments



                • Do not start your variable names with a capital letter (A). This convention is reserved for classes.

                Edit



                Now it came to my mind that you can solve this task with one passage (in O(N)) without an additional array.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jul 19 at 23:33

























                answered Jul 19 at 23:18









                Hlib BabiiHlib Babii

                1312 bronze badges




                1312 bronze badges






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f224501%2ffinding-unpaired-number-in-an-odd-array-of-integers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                    Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                    Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?