Merge multiple DataFrames Pandas Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experiencePandas Merging 101MemoryError when I merge two Pandas data framesMerge multiple DataFramesHow to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)Selecting multiple columns in a pandas dataframeRenaming columns in pandasAdding new column to existing DataFrame in Python pandasDelete column from pandas DataFrame by column name“Large data” work flows using pandasHow to iterate over rows in a DataFrame in Pandas?Select rows from a DataFrame based on values in a column in pandasGet list from pandas DataFrame column headers

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign

Can't figure this one out.. What is the missing box?

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

Slither Like a Snake

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

Two different pronunciation of "понял"

Passing functions in C++

What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?

A constraint that implies convexity

Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?

Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]

When is phishing education going too far?

Problem when applying foreach loop

How to colour the US map with Yellow, Green, Red and Blue to minimize the number of states with the colour of Green

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?

Strange behaviour of Check

Simulating Exploding Dice

Array/tabular for long multiplication

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551



Merge multiple DataFrames Pandas



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experiencePandas Merging 101MemoryError when I merge two Pandas data framesMerge multiple DataFramesHow to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)Selecting multiple columns in a pandas dataframeRenaming columns in pandasAdding new column to existing DataFrame in Python pandasDelete column from pandas DataFrame by column name“Large data” work flows using pandasHow to iterate over rows in a DataFrame in Pandas?Select rows from a DataFrame based on values in a column in pandasGet list from pandas DataFrame column headers



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








8















This might be considered as a duplicate of a thorough explanation of various approaches, however I can't seem to find a solution to my problem there due to a higher number of Data Frames.



I have multiple Data Frames (more than 10), each differing in one column VARX. This is just a quick and oversimplified example:



import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [0.500000, 0.600000, 1.300000],
'VAR1': [38.196202, 38.198002, 38.200001],
'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])

df2 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [0.600000, 1.100000, 1.200000],
'VAR2': [0.20440, 0.20442, 0.20446],
'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])

df3 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [1.200000, 1.300000, 1.400000],
'VAR3': [15.1880, 15.1820, 15.1820],
'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])


Each df has same or different depths for the same profiles, so



I need to create a new DataFrame which would merge all separate ones, where the key columns for the operation are depth and profile, with all appearing depth values for each profile.



The VARX value should be therefore NaN where there is no depth measurement of that variable for that profile.



The result should be a thus a new, compressed DataFrame with all VARX as additional columns to the depth and profile ones, something like this:



name_profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
profile_1 0.500000 38.196202 NaN NaN
profile_1 0.600000 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
profile_1 1.100000 NaN 0.20442 NaN
profile_1 1.200000 NaN 0.20446 15.1880
profile_1 1.300000 38.200001 NaN 15.1820
profile_1 1.400000 NaN NaN 15.1820


Note that the actual number of profiles is much, much bigger.



Any ideas?










share|improve this question






























    8















    This might be considered as a duplicate of a thorough explanation of various approaches, however I can't seem to find a solution to my problem there due to a higher number of Data Frames.



    I have multiple Data Frames (more than 10), each differing in one column VARX. This is just a quick and oversimplified example:



    import pandas as pd

    df1 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [0.500000, 0.600000, 1.300000],
    'VAR1': [38.196202, 38.198002, 38.200001],
    'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])

    df2 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [0.600000, 1.100000, 1.200000],
    'VAR2': [0.20440, 0.20442, 0.20446],
    'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])

    df3 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [1.200000, 1.300000, 1.400000],
    'VAR3': [15.1880, 15.1820, 15.1820],
    'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])


    Each df has same or different depths for the same profiles, so



    I need to create a new DataFrame which would merge all separate ones, where the key columns for the operation are depth and profile, with all appearing depth values for each profile.



    The VARX value should be therefore NaN where there is no depth measurement of that variable for that profile.



    The result should be a thus a new, compressed DataFrame with all VARX as additional columns to the depth and profile ones, something like this:



    name_profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
    profile_1 0.500000 38.196202 NaN NaN
    profile_1 0.600000 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
    profile_1 1.100000 NaN 0.20442 NaN
    profile_1 1.200000 NaN 0.20446 15.1880
    profile_1 1.300000 38.200001 NaN 15.1820
    profile_1 1.400000 NaN NaN 15.1820


    Note that the actual number of profiles is much, much bigger.



    Any ideas?










    share|improve this question


























      8












      8








      8


      1






      This might be considered as a duplicate of a thorough explanation of various approaches, however I can't seem to find a solution to my problem there due to a higher number of Data Frames.



      I have multiple Data Frames (more than 10), each differing in one column VARX. This is just a quick and oversimplified example:



      import pandas as pd

      df1 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [0.500000, 0.600000, 1.300000],
      'VAR1': [38.196202, 38.198002, 38.200001],
      'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])

      df2 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [0.600000, 1.100000, 1.200000],
      'VAR2': [0.20440, 0.20442, 0.20446],
      'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])

      df3 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [1.200000, 1.300000, 1.400000],
      'VAR3': [15.1880, 15.1820, 15.1820],
      'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])


      Each df has same or different depths for the same profiles, so



      I need to create a new DataFrame which would merge all separate ones, where the key columns for the operation are depth and profile, with all appearing depth values for each profile.



      The VARX value should be therefore NaN where there is no depth measurement of that variable for that profile.



      The result should be a thus a new, compressed DataFrame with all VARX as additional columns to the depth and profile ones, something like this:



      name_profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
      profile_1 0.500000 38.196202 NaN NaN
      profile_1 0.600000 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
      profile_1 1.100000 NaN 0.20442 NaN
      profile_1 1.200000 NaN 0.20446 15.1880
      profile_1 1.300000 38.200001 NaN 15.1820
      profile_1 1.400000 NaN NaN 15.1820


      Note that the actual number of profiles is much, much bigger.



      Any ideas?










      share|improve this question
















      This might be considered as a duplicate of a thorough explanation of various approaches, however I can't seem to find a solution to my problem there due to a higher number of Data Frames.



      I have multiple Data Frames (more than 10), each differing in one column VARX. This is just a quick and oversimplified example:



      import pandas as pd

      df1 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [0.500000, 0.600000, 1.300000],
      'VAR1': [38.196202, 38.198002, 38.200001],
      'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])

      df2 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [0.600000, 1.100000, 1.200000],
      'VAR2': [0.20440, 0.20442, 0.20446],
      'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])

      df3 = pd.DataFrame('depth': [1.200000, 1.300000, 1.400000],
      'VAR3': [15.1880, 15.1820, 15.1820],
      'profile': ['profile_1', 'profile_1','profile_1'])


      Each df has same or different depths for the same profiles, so



      I need to create a new DataFrame which would merge all separate ones, where the key columns for the operation are depth and profile, with all appearing depth values for each profile.



      The VARX value should be therefore NaN where there is no depth measurement of that variable for that profile.



      The result should be a thus a new, compressed DataFrame with all VARX as additional columns to the depth and profile ones, something like this:



      name_profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
      profile_1 0.500000 38.196202 NaN NaN
      profile_1 0.600000 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
      profile_1 1.100000 NaN 0.20442 NaN
      profile_1 1.200000 NaN 0.20446 15.1880
      profile_1 1.300000 38.200001 NaN 15.1820
      profile_1 1.400000 NaN NaN 15.1820


      Note that the actual number of profiles is much, much bigger.



      Any ideas?







      python pandas dataframe






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago







      PEBKAC

















      asked 2 days ago









      PEBKACPEBKAC

      321110




      321110






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Consider setting index on each data frame and then run the horizontal merge with pd.concat:



          dfs = [df.set_index(['profile', 'depth']) for df in [df1, df2, df3]]

          print(pd.concat(dfs, axis=1).reset_index())
          # profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
          # 0 profile_1 0.5 38.198002 NaN NaN
          # 1 profile_1 0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
          # 2 profile_1 1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
          # 3 profile_1 1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
          # 4 profile_1 1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
          # 5 profile_1 1.4 NaN NaN 15.182





          share|improve this answer























          • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

            – PEBKAC
            2 days ago







          • 1





            Ah, my mistake, do not bracket m which casts as list: dfs = [pd.read_csv(m, index_col=[0,1]) for m in myfiles]

            – Parfait
            2 days ago






          • 1





            You have multiple rows with same profile AND depth. Originally you had that same issue in your post and I noticed you edited the first df's depth from 0.6 to 0.5. Try de-duping or aggregating before setting index and concatenating.

            – Parfait
            2 days ago






          • 1





            I believe that is a different question and you already accepted a solution here (which come to think may result in a duplicate joins). Make an earnest effort and come back to SO with specific issues.

            – Parfait
            2 days ago






          • 1





            You should close this one out as answers here does resolve your immediate question that even uses posted data. The data size and even data content with dups is a different question.

            – Parfait
            2 days ago


















          3














          Or using merge:



          from functools import partial, reduce

          dfs = [df1,df2,df3]
          merge = partial(pd.merge, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
          reduce(merge, dfs)

          depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
          0 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
          1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
          2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
          3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
          4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
          5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182


          Update



          For merging the dataframes in a loop as suggested in the comments, you could do something like:



          df_final = pd.DataFrame(columns=df1.columns)
          for df in dfs:
          df_final = df_final.merge(df, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')





          share|improve this answer

























          • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

            – PEBKAC
            2 days ago







          • 1





            Well the main purpose of reduce here is to avoid a loop. If you prefer that approach I assume for memory constraints, you need a single merge on each iteration. Simply update the resulting dataframe on each loop

            – yatu
            2 days ago












          • thank you, that's super helpful, but would you perhaps care to show how such an iteration would look like, perhaps just here as a comment? I'm not really sure how to continue

            – PEBKAC
            2 days ago






          • 1





            Check the update @PEBKAC

            – yatu
            2 days ago






          • 1





            Well if you have to end up merging them all, you likely won't be able to obtain the final dataframe anyway. I'd suggest you to work with chunks of data. Check stackoverflow.com/questions/47386405/…

            – yatu
            2 days ago


















          1














          I would use append.



          >>> df1.append(df2).append(df3).sort_values('depth')

          VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 depth profile
          0 38.196202 NaN NaN 0.5 profile_1
          1 38.198002 NaN NaN 0.6 profile_1
          0 NaN 0.20440 NaN 0.6 profile_1
          1 NaN 0.20442 NaN 1.1 profile_1
          2 NaN 0.20446 NaN 1.2 profile_1
          0 NaN NaN 15.188 1.2 profile_1
          2 38.200001 NaN NaN 1.3 profile_1
          1 NaN NaN 15.182 1.3 profile_1
          2 NaN NaN 15.182 1.4 profile_1


          Obviously if you have a lot of dataframes, just make a list and loop through them.






          share|improve this answer

























          • thank you! @BlivetWidget, how do you sort it both by depth AND profile? each profile has a set of depths and each dataframe has a bunch of profiles?

            – PEBKAC
            2 days ago






          • 1





            @PEBKAC you can sort it by however many parameters you want, in whatever order you want. .sort_values(['depth', 'profile']) or .sort_values(['profile', 'depth']). You can check the help on df1.sort_values to learn how to change the sort order, to sort in place, and various other optional parameters.

            – BlivetWidget
            2 days ago











          • thank you, most helpful!

            – PEBKAC
            2 days ago


















          1














          Why not concatenate all the Data Frames, melt, then reform them using your ids? There might be a more efficient way to do this, but this works.



          df=pd.melt(pd.concat([df1,df2,df3]),id_vars=['profile','depth'])
          df_pivot=df.pivot_table(index=['profile','depth'],columns='variable',values='value')


          Where df_pivot will be



          variable VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
          profile depth
          profile_1 0.5 38.196202 NaN NaN
          0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
          1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
          1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
          1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
          1.4 NaN NaN 15.182





          share|improve this answer






























            1














            You can also use:



            dfs = [df1, df2, df3]
            df = pd.merge(dfs[0], dfs[1], left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
            for d in dfs[2:]:
            df = pd.merge(df, d, left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')

            depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
            0 0.5 38.196202 profile_1 NaN NaN
            1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
            2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
            3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
            4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
            5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182





            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              );
              );
              , "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55652704%2fmerge-multiple-dataframes-pandas%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              5 Answers
              5






              active

              oldest

              votes








              5 Answers
              5






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5














              Consider setting index on each data frame and then run the horizontal merge with pd.concat:



              dfs = [df.set_index(['profile', 'depth']) for df in [df1, df2, df3]]

              print(pd.concat(dfs, axis=1).reset_index())
              # profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
              # 0 profile_1 0.5 38.198002 NaN NaN
              # 1 profile_1 0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
              # 2 profile_1 1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
              # 3 profile_1 1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
              # 4 profile_1 1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
              # 5 profile_1 1.4 NaN NaN 15.182





              share|improve this answer























              • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago







              • 1





                Ah, my mistake, do not bracket m which casts as list: dfs = [pd.read_csv(m, index_col=[0,1]) for m in myfiles]

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                You have multiple rows with same profile AND depth. Originally you had that same issue in your post and I noticed you edited the first df's depth from 0.6 to 0.5. Try de-duping or aggregating before setting index and concatenating.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                I believe that is a different question and you already accepted a solution here (which come to think may result in a duplicate joins). Make an earnest effort and come back to SO with specific issues.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                You should close this one out as answers here does resolve your immediate question that even uses posted data. The data size and even data content with dups is a different question.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago















              5














              Consider setting index on each data frame and then run the horizontal merge with pd.concat:



              dfs = [df.set_index(['profile', 'depth']) for df in [df1, df2, df3]]

              print(pd.concat(dfs, axis=1).reset_index())
              # profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
              # 0 profile_1 0.5 38.198002 NaN NaN
              # 1 profile_1 0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
              # 2 profile_1 1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
              # 3 profile_1 1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
              # 4 profile_1 1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
              # 5 profile_1 1.4 NaN NaN 15.182





              share|improve this answer























              • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago







              • 1





                Ah, my mistake, do not bracket m which casts as list: dfs = [pd.read_csv(m, index_col=[0,1]) for m in myfiles]

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                You have multiple rows with same profile AND depth. Originally you had that same issue in your post and I noticed you edited the first df's depth from 0.6 to 0.5. Try de-duping or aggregating before setting index and concatenating.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                I believe that is a different question and you already accepted a solution here (which come to think may result in a duplicate joins). Make an earnest effort and come back to SO with specific issues.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                You should close this one out as answers here does resolve your immediate question that even uses posted data. The data size and even data content with dups is a different question.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago













              5












              5








              5







              Consider setting index on each data frame and then run the horizontal merge with pd.concat:



              dfs = [df.set_index(['profile', 'depth']) for df in [df1, df2, df3]]

              print(pd.concat(dfs, axis=1).reset_index())
              # profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
              # 0 profile_1 0.5 38.198002 NaN NaN
              # 1 profile_1 0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
              # 2 profile_1 1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
              # 3 profile_1 1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
              # 4 profile_1 1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
              # 5 profile_1 1.4 NaN NaN 15.182





              share|improve this answer













              Consider setting index on each data frame and then run the horizontal merge with pd.concat:



              dfs = [df.set_index(['profile', 'depth']) for df in [df1, df2, df3]]

              print(pd.concat(dfs, axis=1).reset_index())
              # profile depth VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
              # 0 profile_1 0.5 38.198002 NaN NaN
              # 1 profile_1 0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
              # 2 profile_1 1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
              # 3 profile_1 1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
              # 4 profile_1 1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
              # 5 profile_1 1.4 NaN NaN 15.182






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 2 days ago









              ParfaitParfait

              54.3k104872




              54.3k104872












              • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago







              • 1





                Ah, my mistake, do not bracket m which casts as list: dfs = [pd.read_csv(m, index_col=[0,1]) for m in myfiles]

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                You have multiple rows with same profile AND depth. Originally you had that same issue in your post and I noticed you edited the first df's depth from 0.6 to 0.5. Try de-duping or aggregating before setting index and concatenating.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                I believe that is a different question and you already accepted a solution here (which come to think may result in a duplicate joins). Make an earnest effort and come back to SO with specific issues.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                You should close this one out as answers here does resolve your immediate question that even uses posted data. The data size and even data content with dups is a different question.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago

















              • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago







              • 1





                Ah, my mistake, do not bracket m which casts as list: dfs = [pd.read_csv(m, index_col=[0,1]) for m in myfiles]

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                You have multiple rows with same profile AND depth. Originally you had that same issue in your post and I noticed you edited the first df's depth from 0.6 to 0.5. Try de-duping or aggregating before setting index and concatenating.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                I believe that is a different question and you already accepted a solution here (which come to think may result in a duplicate joins). Make an earnest effort and come back to SO with specific issues.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago






              • 1





                You should close this one out as answers here does resolve your immediate question that even uses posted data. The data size and even data content with dups is a different question.

                – Parfait
                2 days ago
















              that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago






              that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago





              1




              1





              Ah, my mistake, do not bracket m which casts as list: dfs = [pd.read_csv(m, index_col=[0,1]) for m in myfiles]

              – Parfait
              2 days ago





              Ah, my mistake, do not bracket m which casts as list: dfs = [pd.read_csv(m, index_col=[0,1]) for m in myfiles]

              – Parfait
              2 days ago




              1




              1





              You have multiple rows with same profile AND depth. Originally you had that same issue in your post and I noticed you edited the first df's depth from 0.6 to 0.5. Try de-duping or aggregating before setting index and concatenating.

              – Parfait
              2 days ago





              You have multiple rows with same profile AND depth. Originally you had that same issue in your post and I noticed you edited the first df's depth from 0.6 to 0.5. Try de-duping or aggregating before setting index and concatenating.

              – Parfait
              2 days ago




              1




              1





              I believe that is a different question and you already accepted a solution here (which come to think may result in a duplicate joins). Make an earnest effort and come back to SO with specific issues.

              – Parfait
              2 days ago





              I believe that is a different question and you already accepted a solution here (which come to think may result in a duplicate joins). Make an earnest effort and come back to SO with specific issues.

              – Parfait
              2 days ago




              1




              1





              You should close this one out as answers here does resolve your immediate question that even uses posted data. The data size and even data content with dups is a different question.

              – Parfait
              2 days ago





              You should close this one out as answers here does resolve your immediate question that even uses posted data. The data size and even data content with dups is a different question.

              – Parfait
              2 days ago













              3














              Or using merge:



              from functools import partial, reduce

              dfs = [df1,df2,df3]
              merge = partial(pd.merge, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
              reduce(merge, dfs)

              depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
              0 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
              1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
              2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
              3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
              4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
              5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182


              Update



              For merging the dataframes in a loop as suggested in the comments, you could do something like:



              df_final = pd.DataFrame(columns=df1.columns)
              for df in dfs:
              df_final = df_final.merge(df, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')





              share|improve this answer

























              • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago







              • 1





                Well the main purpose of reduce here is to avoid a loop. If you prefer that approach I assume for memory constraints, you need a single merge on each iteration. Simply update the resulting dataframe on each loop

                – yatu
                2 days ago












              • thank you, that's super helpful, but would you perhaps care to show how such an iteration would look like, perhaps just here as a comment? I'm not really sure how to continue

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago






              • 1





                Check the update @PEBKAC

                – yatu
                2 days ago






              • 1





                Well if you have to end up merging them all, you likely won't be able to obtain the final dataframe anyway. I'd suggest you to work with chunks of data. Check stackoverflow.com/questions/47386405/…

                – yatu
                2 days ago















              3














              Or using merge:



              from functools import partial, reduce

              dfs = [df1,df2,df3]
              merge = partial(pd.merge, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
              reduce(merge, dfs)

              depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
              0 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
              1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
              2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
              3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
              4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
              5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182


              Update



              For merging the dataframes in a loop as suggested in the comments, you could do something like:



              df_final = pd.DataFrame(columns=df1.columns)
              for df in dfs:
              df_final = df_final.merge(df, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')





              share|improve this answer

























              • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago







              • 1





                Well the main purpose of reduce here is to avoid a loop. If you prefer that approach I assume for memory constraints, you need a single merge on each iteration. Simply update the resulting dataframe on each loop

                – yatu
                2 days ago












              • thank you, that's super helpful, but would you perhaps care to show how such an iteration would look like, perhaps just here as a comment? I'm not really sure how to continue

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago






              • 1





                Check the update @PEBKAC

                – yatu
                2 days ago






              • 1





                Well if you have to end up merging them all, you likely won't be able to obtain the final dataframe anyway. I'd suggest you to work with chunks of data. Check stackoverflow.com/questions/47386405/…

                – yatu
                2 days ago













              3












              3








              3







              Or using merge:



              from functools import partial, reduce

              dfs = [df1,df2,df3]
              merge = partial(pd.merge, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
              reduce(merge, dfs)

              depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
              0 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
              1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
              2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
              3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
              4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
              5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182


              Update



              For merging the dataframes in a loop as suggested in the comments, you could do something like:



              df_final = pd.DataFrame(columns=df1.columns)
              for df in dfs:
              df_final = df_final.merge(df, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')





              share|improve this answer















              Or using merge:



              from functools import partial, reduce

              dfs = [df1,df2,df3]
              merge = partial(pd.merge, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
              reduce(merge, dfs)

              depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
              0 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
              1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
              2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
              3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
              4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
              5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182


              Update



              For merging the dataframes in a loop as suggested in the comments, you could do something like:



              df_final = pd.DataFrame(columns=df1.columns)
              for df in dfs:
              df_final = df_final.merge(df, on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 2 days ago

























              answered 2 days ago









              yatuyatu

              15.8k41642




              15.8k41642












              • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago







              • 1





                Well the main purpose of reduce here is to avoid a loop. If you prefer that approach I assume for memory constraints, you need a single merge on each iteration. Simply update the resulting dataframe on each loop

                – yatu
                2 days ago












              • thank you, that's super helpful, but would you perhaps care to show how such an iteration would look like, perhaps just here as a comment? I'm not really sure how to continue

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago






              • 1





                Check the update @PEBKAC

                – yatu
                2 days ago






              • 1





                Well if you have to end up merging them all, you likely won't be able to obtain the final dataframe anyway. I'd suggest you to work with chunks of data. Check stackoverflow.com/questions/47386405/…

                – yatu
                2 days ago

















              • that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago







              • 1





                Well the main purpose of reduce here is to avoid a loop. If you prefer that approach I assume for memory constraints, you need a single merge on each iteration. Simply update the resulting dataframe on each loop

                – yatu
                2 days ago












              • thank you, that's super helpful, but would you perhaps care to show how such an iteration would look like, perhaps just here as a comment? I'm not really sure how to continue

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago






              • 1





                Check the update @PEBKAC

                – yatu
                2 days ago






              • 1





                Well if you have to end up merging them all, you likely won't be able to obtain the final dataframe anyway. I'd suggest you to work with chunks of data. Check stackoverflow.com/questions/47386405/…

                – yatu
                2 days ago
















              that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago






              that's awesome, thank you! How would you do it within a loop, for example: for m in range(len(myfiles)): (where I read separate files for each df) df = pd.read_csv(myfiles[m])

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago





              1




              1





              Well the main purpose of reduce here is to avoid a loop. If you prefer that approach I assume for memory constraints, you need a single merge on each iteration. Simply update the resulting dataframe on each loop

              – yatu
              2 days ago






              Well the main purpose of reduce here is to avoid a loop. If you prefer that approach I assume for memory constraints, you need a single merge on each iteration. Simply update the resulting dataframe on each loop

              – yatu
              2 days ago














              thank you, that's super helpful, but would you perhaps care to show how such an iteration would look like, perhaps just here as a comment? I'm not really sure how to continue

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago





              thank you, that's super helpful, but would you perhaps care to show how such an iteration would look like, perhaps just here as a comment? I'm not really sure how to continue

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago




              1




              1





              Check the update @PEBKAC

              – yatu
              2 days ago





              Check the update @PEBKAC

              – yatu
              2 days ago




              1




              1





              Well if you have to end up merging them all, you likely won't be able to obtain the final dataframe anyway. I'd suggest you to work with chunks of data. Check stackoverflow.com/questions/47386405/…

              – yatu
              2 days ago





              Well if you have to end up merging them all, you likely won't be able to obtain the final dataframe anyway. I'd suggest you to work with chunks of data. Check stackoverflow.com/questions/47386405/…

              – yatu
              2 days ago











              1














              I would use append.



              >>> df1.append(df2).append(df3).sort_values('depth')

              VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 depth profile
              0 38.196202 NaN NaN 0.5 profile_1
              1 38.198002 NaN NaN 0.6 profile_1
              0 NaN 0.20440 NaN 0.6 profile_1
              1 NaN 0.20442 NaN 1.1 profile_1
              2 NaN 0.20446 NaN 1.2 profile_1
              0 NaN NaN 15.188 1.2 profile_1
              2 38.200001 NaN NaN 1.3 profile_1
              1 NaN NaN 15.182 1.3 profile_1
              2 NaN NaN 15.182 1.4 profile_1


              Obviously if you have a lot of dataframes, just make a list and loop through them.






              share|improve this answer

























              • thank you! @BlivetWidget, how do you sort it both by depth AND profile? each profile has a set of depths and each dataframe has a bunch of profiles?

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago






              • 1





                @PEBKAC you can sort it by however many parameters you want, in whatever order you want. .sort_values(['depth', 'profile']) or .sort_values(['profile', 'depth']). You can check the help on df1.sort_values to learn how to change the sort order, to sort in place, and various other optional parameters.

                – BlivetWidget
                2 days ago











              • thank you, most helpful!

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago















              1














              I would use append.



              >>> df1.append(df2).append(df3).sort_values('depth')

              VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 depth profile
              0 38.196202 NaN NaN 0.5 profile_1
              1 38.198002 NaN NaN 0.6 profile_1
              0 NaN 0.20440 NaN 0.6 profile_1
              1 NaN 0.20442 NaN 1.1 profile_1
              2 NaN 0.20446 NaN 1.2 profile_1
              0 NaN NaN 15.188 1.2 profile_1
              2 38.200001 NaN NaN 1.3 profile_1
              1 NaN NaN 15.182 1.3 profile_1
              2 NaN NaN 15.182 1.4 profile_1


              Obviously if you have a lot of dataframes, just make a list and loop through them.






              share|improve this answer

























              • thank you! @BlivetWidget, how do you sort it both by depth AND profile? each profile has a set of depths and each dataframe has a bunch of profiles?

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago






              • 1





                @PEBKAC you can sort it by however many parameters you want, in whatever order you want. .sort_values(['depth', 'profile']) or .sort_values(['profile', 'depth']). You can check the help on df1.sort_values to learn how to change the sort order, to sort in place, and various other optional parameters.

                – BlivetWidget
                2 days ago











              • thank you, most helpful!

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago













              1












              1








              1







              I would use append.



              >>> df1.append(df2).append(df3).sort_values('depth')

              VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 depth profile
              0 38.196202 NaN NaN 0.5 profile_1
              1 38.198002 NaN NaN 0.6 profile_1
              0 NaN 0.20440 NaN 0.6 profile_1
              1 NaN 0.20442 NaN 1.1 profile_1
              2 NaN 0.20446 NaN 1.2 profile_1
              0 NaN NaN 15.188 1.2 profile_1
              2 38.200001 NaN NaN 1.3 profile_1
              1 NaN NaN 15.182 1.3 profile_1
              2 NaN NaN 15.182 1.4 profile_1


              Obviously if you have a lot of dataframes, just make a list and loop through them.






              share|improve this answer















              I would use append.



              >>> df1.append(df2).append(df3).sort_values('depth')

              VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 depth profile
              0 38.196202 NaN NaN 0.5 profile_1
              1 38.198002 NaN NaN 0.6 profile_1
              0 NaN 0.20440 NaN 0.6 profile_1
              1 NaN 0.20442 NaN 1.1 profile_1
              2 NaN 0.20446 NaN 1.2 profile_1
              0 NaN NaN 15.188 1.2 profile_1
              2 38.200001 NaN NaN 1.3 profile_1
              1 NaN NaN 15.182 1.3 profile_1
              2 NaN NaN 15.182 1.4 profile_1


              Obviously if you have a lot of dataframes, just make a list and loop through them.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 2 days ago

























              answered 2 days ago









              BlivetWidgetBlivetWidget

              3,8091922




              3,8091922












              • thank you! @BlivetWidget, how do you sort it both by depth AND profile? each profile has a set of depths and each dataframe has a bunch of profiles?

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago






              • 1





                @PEBKAC you can sort it by however many parameters you want, in whatever order you want. .sort_values(['depth', 'profile']) or .sort_values(['profile', 'depth']). You can check the help on df1.sort_values to learn how to change the sort order, to sort in place, and various other optional parameters.

                – BlivetWidget
                2 days ago











              • thank you, most helpful!

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago

















              • thank you! @BlivetWidget, how do you sort it both by depth AND profile? each profile has a set of depths and each dataframe has a bunch of profiles?

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago






              • 1





                @PEBKAC you can sort it by however many parameters you want, in whatever order you want. .sort_values(['depth', 'profile']) or .sort_values(['profile', 'depth']). You can check the help on df1.sort_values to learn how to change the sort order, to sort in place, and various other optional parameters.

                – BlivetWidget
                2 days ago











              • thank you, most helpful!

                – PEBKAC
                2 days ago
















              thank you! @BlivetWidget, how do you sort it both by depth AND profile? each profile has a set of depths and each dataframe has a bunch of profiles?

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago





              thank you! @BlivetWidget, how do you sort it both by depth AND profile? each profile has a set of depths and each dataframe has a bunch of profiles?

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago




              1




              1





              @PEBKAC you can sort it by however many parameters you want, in whatever order you want. .sort_values(['depth', 'profile']) or .sort_values(['profile', 'depth']). You can check the help on df1.sort_values to learn how to change the sort order, to sort in place, and various other optional parameters.

              – BlivetWidget
              2 days ago





              @PEBKAC you can sort it by however many parameters you want, in whatever order you want. .sort_values(['depth', 'profile']) or .sort_values(['profile', 'depth']). You can check the help on df1.sort_values to learn how to change the sort order, to sort in place, and various other optional parameters.

              – BlivetWidget
              2 days ago













              thank you, most helpful!

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago





              thank you, most helpful!

              – PEBKAC
              2 days ago











              1














              Why not concatenate all the Data Frames, melt, then reform them using your ids? There might be a more efficient way to do this, but this works.



              df=pd.melt(pd.concat([df1,df2,df3]),id_vars=['profile','depth'])
              df_pivot=df.pivot_table(index=['profile','depth'],columns='variable',values='value')


              Where df_pivot will be



              variable VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
              profile depth
              profile_1 0.5 38.196202 NaN NaN
              0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
              1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
              1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
              1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
              1.4 NaN NaN 15.182





              share|improve this answer



























                1














                Why not concatenate all the Data Frames, melt, then reform them using your ids? There might be a more efficient way to do this, but this works.



                df=pd.melt(pd.concat([df1,df2,df3]),id_vars=['profile','depth'])
                df_pivot=df.pivot_table(index=['profile','depth'],columns='variable',values='value')


                Where df_pivot will be



                variable VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
                profile depth
                profile_1 0.5 38.196202 NaN NaN
                0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
                1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
                1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
                1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
                1.4 NaN NaN 15.182





                share|improve this answer

























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Why not concatenate all the Data Frames, melt, then reform them using your ids? There might be a more efficient way to do this, but this works.



                  df=pd.melt(pd.concat([df1,df2,df3]),id_vars=['profile','depth'])
                  df_pivot=df.pivot_table(index=['profile','depth'],columns='variable',values='value')


                  Where df_pivot will be



                  variable VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
                  profile depth
                  profile_1 0.5 38.196202 NaN NaN
                  0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
                  1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
                  1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
                  1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
                  1.4 NaN NaN 15.182





                  share|improve this answer













                  Why not concatenate all the Data Frames, melt, then reform them using your ids? There might be a more efficient way to do this, but this works.



                  df=pd.melt(pd.concat([df1,df2,df3]),id_vars=['profile','depth'])
                  df_pivot=df.pivot_table(index=['profile','depth'],columns='variable',values='value')


                  Where df_pivot will be



                  variable VAR1 VAR2 VAR3
                  profile depth
                  profile_1 0.5 38.196202 NaN NaN
                  0.6 38.198002 0.20440 NaN
                  1.1 NaN 0.20442 NaN
                  1.2 NaN 0.20446 15.188
                  1.3 38.200001 NaN 15.182
                  1.4 NaN NaN 15.182






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  SEpapoulisSEpapoulis

                  463




                  463





















                      1














                      You can also use:



                      dfs = [df1, df2, df3]
                      df = pd.merge(dfs[0], dfs[1], left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
                      for d in dfs[2:]:
                      df = pd.merge(df, d, left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')

                      depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
                      0 0.5 38.196202 profile_1 NaN NaN
                      1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
                      2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
                      3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
                      4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
                      5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182





                      share|improve this answer



























                        1














                        You can also use:



                        dfs = [df1, df2, df3]
                        df = pd.merge(dfs[0], dfs[1], left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
                        for d in dfs[2:]:
                        df = pd.merge(df, d, left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')

                        depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
                        0 0.5 38.196202 profile_1 NaN NaN
                        1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
                        2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
                        3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
                        4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
                        5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182





                        share|improve this answer

























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          You can also use:



                          dfs = [df1, df2, df3]
                          df = pd.merge(dfs[0], dfs[1], left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
                          for d in dfs[2:]:
                          df = pd.merge(df, d, left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')

                          depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
                          0 0.5 38.196202 profile_1 NaN NaN
                          1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
                          2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
                          3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
                          4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
                          5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182





                          share|improve this answer













                          You can also use:



                          dfs = [df1, df2, df3]
                          df = pd.merge(dfs[0], dfs[1], left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')
                          for d in dfs[2:]:
                          df = pd.merge(df, d, left_on=['depth','profile'], right_on=['depth','profile'], how='outer')

                          depth VAR1 profile VAR2 VAR3
                          0 0.5 38.196202 profile_1 NaN NaN
                          1 0.6 38.198002 profile_1 0.20440 NaN
                          2 1.3 38.200001 profile_1 NaN 15.182
                          3 1.1 NaN profile_1 0.20442 NaN
                          4 1.2 NaN profile_1 0.20446 15.188
                          5 1.4 NaN profile_1 NaN 15.182






                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          heena bawaheena bawa

                          61145




                          61145



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55652704%2fmerge-multiple-dataframes-pandas%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Grendel Contents Story Scholarship Depictions Notes References Navigation menu10.1093/notesj/gjn112Berserkeree

                              Area configuration aggregation error after install Porto themeMagento 2.1 CE Installed but front/backend not loading/workingCSS not loading on page within Magento 2 pageCannot install module in Magento 2no commands defined in the “setup” namespace. in Magento2Magento 2: Static files are present but shows 404Why do i have to always run the commands to clean cache in Magento 2.1.8?Failure reason: 'Unable to unserialize value.'Error 500 after magento migrationIn production mode the site does not loadMagento 2 : Error 500 after installing

                              Middle Expansion Olielle Resaix Definition: Uttering songs of triumph shouting with joy triumphant exulting Sejunction Journal 붙다 달 고급 품목 외출 The stretch trades the screeching tin. Definition: The act of speaking with a drawl a drawl Cough Sand Definition: An uproar a quarrel a noisy outbreak Shake Iron Publicize Horse House Baby 사과 Resaix Flaggy Jelly Temporary Unequaled Puppet A drop in the bucket Shrew 성격 회원 성질 미팅 The burn frames the tacky quality. Materialistic The smoke reduces the way. Yammoe Nondescript Cheek 얼굴 배 약하다 날리다 타다 The illegal country shows the iron. Help Rule Drearien Smoke Teaching Meaty Wasp Abraham Lincoln Jaws 진심 수리하다 Size Cork Idea Convert Think Lark John Lennon 거울 청소 군 추천하다 아이스크림