Dual frame in Riemannian metrics.A surface patch $tildesigma(tilde u,tilde v)$ is a reparametrization of a surface patch $sigma (u,v)$Structure equations on the 3-sphereInterior Derivative and Contraction: Kobayashi and Nomizu.Relating existence of a “potential” with exactness of a certain formFinding a basis for the cohomology vector space of 1-forms in the 2-torus, $H^1 (T^2)$Confusion about differential formsCondition for the $1$-form $fomega$, being $f in C(Omega)$ and $omega = omega_1textdx_1 + omega_2textdx_2$, to be closed.Problem to understand first and second fundamental form of a surface.relationship between $du$ and $partial u$ on a surface patch $sigma$ and its reparameterization $tildesigma$Proof of theorem egregium with moving frames

How does weapons training transfer to empty hand?

Row vectors and column vectors (Mathematica vs Matlab)

Has everyone forgotten about wildfire?

Not taking the bishop with the knight, why?

Does STATISTICS IO output include Version Store reads?

What's the "magic similar to the Knock spell" referenced in the Dungeon of the Mad Mage adventure?

How to avoid making self and former employee look bad when reporting on fixing former employee's work?

Tub Drain SLOWLY Drains - If You Hold "Knob" Down It Drains At Regular Speed

Is it a good idea to copy a trader when investing?

What replaces x86 intrinsics for C when Apple ditches Intel CPUs for their own chips?

Are wands in any sort of book going to be too much like Harry Potter?

Examples where existence is harder than evaluation

Gift for mentor after his thesis defense?

Was the Highlands Ranch shooting the 115th mass shooting in the US in 2019

Which spells are in some way related to shadows or the Shadowfell?

Are double contractions formal? Eg: "couldn't've" for "could not have"

Using wilcox.test() and t.test() in R yielding different p-values

What does the "DS" in "DS-..." US visa application forms stand for?

Narcissistic cube asks who are we?

Why is there a cap on 401k contributions?

My perfect evil overlord plan... or is it?

Output the date in the Mel calendar

Hexagonal Grid Filling

Integral with DiracDelta. Can Mathematica be made to solve this?



Dual frame in Riemannian metrics.


A surface patch $tildesigma(tilde u,tilde v)$ is a reparametrization of a surface patch $sigma (u,v)$Structure equations on the 3-sphereInterior Derivative and Contraction: Kobayashi and Nomizu.Relating existence of a “potential” with exactness of a certain formFinding a basis for the cohomology vector space of 1-forms in the 2-torus, $H^1 (T^2)$Confusion about differential formsCondition for the $1$-form $fomega$, being $f in C(Omega)$ and $omega = omega_1textdx_1 + omega_2textdx_2$, to be closed.Problem to understand first and second fundamental form of a surface.relationship between $du$ and $partial u$ on a surface patch $sigma$ and its reparameterization $tildesigma$Proof of theorem egregium with moving frames













5












$begingroup$


Suppose that we have a Riemannian metric $ds^2=Edu^2+2Fdudv+Gdv^2$ on a local coordinate neighborhood $(U;(u,v))$ prove that for the following vector fields:



$$e_1=frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u,quad e_2=frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)$$



The $1-$forms:
$$omega_1=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright),quad omega_2=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edv$$
satisfies:
$$omega_i(e_k)=delta_ik$$



My work: Let $p(u,v)$ a differentiable function, I think that I must show fisrtly that $omega_1(e_1(p))=p$, i.e. $omega_1(e_1)=1$ the identity function.



$$omega_1left(tfrac1sqrtEtfracpartialpartial u(p)right)=tfrac1sqrtEtfracpartialpartial u(omega_1(p))$$
I do this beacuse an $1-form$ $alpha$ is such that $alpha(fX)=falpha(X)$. Then It is correct that
$omega_1(p)=sqrtEleft(pdu+fracFEpdvright)?$
and then apply the partial derivative, my problem is that I don't know ho operate the $1$-form. Anyone can guide me in how can I reach the result or a explicit form to operate with $omega_1$ and $omega_2$?



I'm using the book "Umehara, differential geometry of surfaces".










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    Suppose that we have a Riemannian metric $ds^2=Edu^2+2Fdudv+Gdv^2$ on a local coordinate neighborhood $(U;(u,v))$ prove that for the following vector fields:



    $$e_1=frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u,quad e_2=frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)$$



    The $1-$forms:
    $$omega_1=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright),quad omega_2=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edv$$
    satisfies:
    $$omega_i(e_k)=delta_ik$$



    My work: Let $p(u,v)$ a differentiable function, I think that I must show fisrtly that $omega_1(e_1(p))=p$, i.e. $omega_1(e_1)=1$ the identity function.



    $$omega_1left(tfrac1sqrtEtfracpartialpartial u(p)right)=tfrac1sqrtEtfracpartialpartial u(omega_1(p))$$
    I do this beacuse an $1-form$ $alpha$ is such that $alpha(fX)=falpha(X)$. Then It is correct that
    $omega_1(p)=sqrtEleft(pdu+fracFEpdvright)?$
    and then apply the partial derivative, my problem is that I don't know ho operate the $1$-form. Anyone can guide me in how can I reach the result or a explicit form to operate with $omega_1$ and $omega_2$?



    I'm using the book "Umehara, differential geometry of surfaces".










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      Suppose that we have a Riemannian metric $ds^2=Edu^2+2Fdudv+Gdv^2$ on a local coordinate neighborhood $(U;(u,v))$ prove that for the following vector fields:



      $$e_1=frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u,quad e_2=frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)$$



      The $1-$forms:
      $$omega_1=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright),quad omega_2=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edv$$
      satisfies:
      $$omega_i(e_k)=delta_ik$$



      My work: Let $p(u,v)$ a differentiable function, I think that I must show fisrtly that $omega_1(e_1(p))=p$, i.e. $omega_1(e_1)=1$ the identity function.



      $$omega_1left(tfrac1sqrtEtfracpartialpartial u(p)right)=tfrac1sqrtEtfracpartialpartial u(omega_1(p))$$
      I do this beacuse an $1-form$ $alpha$ is such that $alpha(fX)=falpha(X)$. Then It is correct that
      $omega_1(p)=sqrtEleft(pdu+fracFEpdvright)?$
      and then apply the partial derivative, my problem is that I don't know ho operate the $1$-form. Anyone can guide me in how can I reach the result or a explicit form to operate with $omega_1$ and $omega_2$?



      I'm using the book "Umehara, differential geometry of surfaces".










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose that we have a Riemannian metric $ds^2=Edu^2+2Fdudv+Gdv^2$ on a local coordinate neighborhood $(U;(u,v))$ prove that for the following vector fields:



      $$e_1=frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u,quad e_2=frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)$$



      The $1-$forms:
      $$omega_1=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright),quad omega_2=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edv$$
      satisfies:
      $$omega_i(e_k)=delta_ik$$



      My work: Let $p(u,v)$ a differentiable function, I think that I must show fisrtly that $omega_1(e_1(p))=p$, i.e. $omega_1(e_1)=1$ the identity function.



      $$omega_1left(tfrac1sqrtEtfracpartialpartial u(p)right)=tfrac1sqrtEtfracpartialpartial u(omega_1(p))$$
      I do this beacuse an $1-form$ $alpha$ is such that $alpha(fX)=falpha(X)$. Then It is correct that
      $omega_1(p)=sqrtEleft(pdu+fracFEpdvright)?$
      and then apply the partial derivative, my problem is that I don't know ho operate the $1$-form. Anyone can guide me in how can I reach the result or a explicit form to operate with $omega_1$ and $omega_2$?



      I'm using the book "Umehara, differential geometry of surfaces".







      differential-geometry manifolds differential-forms






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked May 6 at 1:02









      Ragnar1204Ragnar1204

      531417




      531417




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          I think you can do this by direct calculation. Fix $pin U$. If $X_pin TU_p$, then $X_p=apartial_u+bpartial_v$ for some $a,bin mathbb R$, and by definition of the $1-$forms $du$ and $dv$, we have $du(X_p)=a$ and $dv(X_p)=b$. Now, apply this to the tangent vectors $e_1$ and $e_2$:



          $omega_1(e_1)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u=sqrt Efrac1sqrt E(partial_uu)=fracsqrt Esqrt E=1$



          Similarly,



          $omega_1(e_2)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)left(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right )=-fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2left (fracFsqrt E-fracFsqrt EEright )=0.$



          $omega_2(e_1)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u right)=sqrtfracEG-F^2E^2partial_u v=0$



          and



          $omega_2(e_2)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right)=left(sqrtfracEG-F^2Eright)cdot left(fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2right)=1$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Wow, what a surprising clear answer! thanks a lot, you've clarified this mess for me, really thanks! +1
            $endgroup$
            – Ragnar1204
            May 6 at 3:11










          • $begingroup$
            You are welcome!
            $endgroup$
            – Matematleta
            May 6 at 4:19


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Note that $e_i$ is an orthonormal vector fields wrt $ds^2$. Hence we let $
          omega_i=ds^2(e_i,cdot)$
          which is dual frame.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3215295%2fdual-frame-in-riemannian-metrics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            I think you can do this by direct calculation. Fix $pin U$. If $X_pin TU_p$, then $X_p=apartial_u+bpartial_v$ for some $a,bin mathbb R$, and by definition of the $1-$forms $du$ and $dv$, we have $du(X_p)=a$ and $dv(X_p)=b$. Now, apply this to the tangent vectors $e_1$ and $e_2$:



            $omega_1(e_1)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u=sqrt Efrac1sqrt E(partial_uu)=fracsqrt Esqrt E=1$



            Similarly,



            $omega_1(e_2)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)left(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right )=-fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2left (fracFsqrt E-fracFsqrt EEright )=0.$



            $omega_2(e_1)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u right)=sqrtfracEG-F^2E^2partial_u v=0$



            and



            $omega_2(e_2)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right)=left(sqrtfracEG-F^2Eright)cdot left(fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2right)=1$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Wow, what a surprising clear answer! thanks a lot, you've clarified this mess for me, really thanks! +1
              $endgroup$
              – Ragnar1204
              May 6 at 3:11










            • $begingroup$
              You are welcome!
              $endgroup$
              – Matematleta
              May 6 at 4:19















            4












            $begingroup$

            I think you can do this by direct calculation. Fix $pin U$. If $X_pin TU_p$, then $X_p=apartial_u+bpartial_v$ for some $a,bin mathbb R$, and by definition of the $1-$forms $du$ and $dv$, we have $du(X_p)=a$ and $dv(X_p)=b$. Now, apply this to the tangent vectors $e_1$ and $e_2$:



            $omega_1(e_1)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u=sqrt Efrac1sqrt E(partial_uu)=fracsqrt Esqrt E=1$



            Similarly,



            $omega_1(e_2)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)left(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right )=-fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2left (fracFsqrt E-fracFsqrt EEright )=0.$



            $omega_2(e_1)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u right)=sqrtfracEG-F^2E^2partial_u v=0$



            and



            $omega_2(e_2)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right)=left(sqrtfracEG-F^2Eright)cdot left(fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2right)=1$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Wow, what a surprising clear answer! thanks a lot, you've clarified this mess for me, really thanks! +1
              $endgroup$
              – Ragnar1204
              May 6 at 3:11










            • $begingroup$
              You are welcome!
              $endgroup$
              – Matematleta
              May 6 at 4:19













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            I think you can do this by direct calculation. Fix $pin U$. If $X_pin TU_p$, then $X_p=apartial_u+bpartial_v$ for some $a,bin mathbb R$, and by definition of the $1-$forms $du$ and $dv$, we have $du(X_p)=a$ and $dv(X_p)=b$. Now, apply this to the tangent vectors $e_1$ and $e_2$:



            $omega_1(e_1)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u=sqrt Efrac1sqrt E(partial_uu)=fracsqrt Esqrt E=1$



            Similarly,



            $omega_1(e_2)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)left(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right )=-fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2left (fracFsqrt E-fracFsqrt EEright )=0.$



            $omega_2(e_1)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u right)=sqrtfracEG-F^2E^2partial_u v=0$



            and



            $omega_2(e_2)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right)=left(sqrtfracEG-F^2Eright)cdot left(fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2right)=1$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            I think you can do this by direct calculation. Fix $pin U$. If $X_pin TU_p$, then $X_p=apartial_u+bpartial_v$ for some $a,bin mathbb R$, and by definition of the $1-$forms $du$ and $dv$, we have $du(X_p)=a$ and $dv(X_p)=b$. Now, apply this to the tangent vectors $e_1$ and $e_2$:



            $omega_1(e_1)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u=sqrt Efrac1sqrt E(partial_uu)=fracsqrt Esqrt E=1$



            Similarly,



            $omega_1(e_2)=sqrtEleft(du+fracFEdvright)left(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right )=-fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2left (fracFsqrt E-fracFsqrt EEright )=0.$



            $omega_2(e_1)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac1sqrtEfracpartialpartial u right)=sqrtfracEG-F^2E^2partial_u v=0$



            and



            $omega_2(e_2)=sqrtfracEG-F^2Edvleft(frac-1sqrtEG-F^2left(fracFsqrtEfracpartialpartial u-sqrtEfracpartialpartial vright)right)=left(sqrtfracEG-F^2Eright)cdot left(fracsqrt EsqrtEG-F^2right)=1$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered May 6 at 1:56









            MatematletaMatematleta

            12.5k21020




            12.5k21020











            • $begingroup$
              Wow, what a surprising clear answer! thanks a lot, you've clarified this mess for me, really thanks! +1
              $endgroup$
              – Ragnar1204
              May 6 at 3:11










            • $begingroup$
              You are welcome!
              $endgroup$
              – Matematleta
              May 6 at 4:19
















            • $begingroup$
              Wow, what a surprising clear answer! thanks a lot, you've clarified this mess for me, really thanks! +1
              $endgroup$
              – Ragnar1204
              May 6 at 3:11










            • $begingroup$
              You are welcome!
              $endgroup$
              – Matematleta
              May 6 at 4:19















            $begingroup$
            Wow, what a surprising clear answer! thanks a lot, you've clarified this mess for me, really thanks! +1
            $endgroup$
            – Ragnar1204
            May 6 at 3:11




            $begingroup$
            Wow, what a surprising clear answer! thanks a lot, you've clarified this mess for me, really thanks! +1
            $endgroup$
            – Ragnar1204
            May 6 at 3:11












            $begingroup$
            You are welcome!
            $endgroup$
            – Matematleta
            May 6 at 4:19




            $begingroup$
            You are welcome!
            $endgroup$
            – Matematleta
            May 6 at 4:19











            3












            $begingroup$

            Note that $e_i$ is an orthonormal vector fields wrt $ds^2$. Hence we let $
            omega_i=ds^2(e_i,cdot)$
            which is dual frame.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              Note that $e_i$ is an orthonormal vector fields wrt $ds^2$. Hence we let $
              omega_i=ds^2(e_i,cdot)$
              which is dual frame.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                Note that $e_i$ is an orthonormal vector fields wrt $ds^2$. Hence we let $
                omega_i=ds^2(e_i,cdot)$
                which is dual frame.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Note that $e_i$ is an orthonormal vector fields wrt $ds^2$. Hence we let $
                omega_i=ds^2(e_i,cdot)$
                which is dual frame.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered May 6 at 1:43









                HK LeeHK Lee

                14.2k52363




                14.2k52363



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3215295%2fdual-frame-in-riemannian-metrics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Category:9 (number) SubcategoriesMedia in category "9 (number)"Navigation menuUpload mediaGND ID: 4485639-8Library of Congress authority ID: sh85091979ReasonatorScholiaStatistics

                    Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

                    Magento 2 “No Payment Methods” in Admin New OrderHow to integrate Paypal Express Checkout with the Magento APIMagento 1.5 - Sales > Order > edit order and shipping methods disappearAuto Invoice Check/Money Order Payment methodAdd more simple payment methods?Shipping methods not showingWhat should I do to change payment methods if changing the configuration has no effects?1.9 - No Payment Methods showing upMy Payment Methods not Showing for downloadable/virtual product when checkout?Magento2 API to access internal payment methodHow to call an existing payment methods in the registration form?