Finding the maximum real part of rootsPlot the maximum of the real parts of the eigenvalues of a trancendental equationPlot cubic root which includes the negative graphFindRoot gives a wrong solution which obviously should not be thereEvaluating the real part of an expressionStability analysis of transcendental equation (stability crossing curves)A question about ContourPlotFinding Real Roots and Determining RangeThe function is real, while its integral is complexFinding the real solutions using the ones from a complexificationHow to separate the real part from the imaginary part?Finding the real part of a complicated complex expression
Is disk brake effectiveness mitigated by tyres losing traction under strong braking?
Constitutional limitation of criminalizing behavior in US law?
Can my 2 children, aged 10 and 12, who are US citizens, travel to the USA on expired American passports?
Krull dimension of the ring of global sections
Should homeowners insurance cover the cost of the home?
Endgame puzzle: How to avoid stalemate and win?
Hostile Divisor Numbers
Piano: quaver triplets in RH v dotted quaver and semiquaver in LH
Why did WWI include Japan?
How to pass hash as password to ssh server
Why does sound not move through a wall?
What is the closest airport to the center of the city it serves?
Understanding ties
Sheared off exhasut pipe: How to fix without a welder?
Dirichlet series with a single zero
How to preserve a rare version of a book?
What Kind of Wooden Beam is this
Is there a proof that the set of real numbers can exactly represent distances?
Sci-fi/fantasy book - ships on steel runners skating across ice sheets
As black, how should one respond to 4. Qe2 by white in the Russian Game, Damiano Variation?
Motion-trail-like lines
In Futurama, how many beings has Leela slept with?
How to pass query parameters in URL in Salesforce Summer 19 Release?
weird pluperfect subjunctive in Eutropius
Finding the maximum real part of roots
Plot the maximum of the real parts of the eigenvalues of a trancendental equationPlot cubic root which includes the negative graphFindRoot gives a wrong solution which obviously should not be thereEvaluating the real part of an expressionStability analysis of transcendental equation (stability crossing curves)A question about ContourPlotFinding Real Roots and Determining RangeThe function is real, while its integral is complexFinding the real solutions using the ones from a complexificationHow to separate the real part from the imaginary part?Finding the real part of a complicated complex expression
$begingroup$
Suppose that I have this problem
roots =
Reduce[
Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == Cos[z + Cos[z + Cos[z]]] &&
-3 < Re[z] < 3 && -3 < Im[z] < 3, z] // Quiet;
ListPlot[Re[z], Im[z] /. ToRules[roots],
PlotLabel ->
Style[TraditionalForm[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == Cos[z + Cos[z + Cos[z]]]], 14],
PlotStyle -> Red, AspectRatio -> 1]
Thus as in https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/newin7/content/TranscendentalRoots/PlotTheRootsOfANestedTranscendentalEquation.html
I get a beautiful solution. Suppose now that this equation depends on quantity a in a range of (1, 2).
roots[a_] :=
Reduce[
Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == a + a Cos[z + a Cos[z + Cos[z]]] &&
-3 < Re[z] < 3 && -3 < Im[z] < 3, z] // Quiet; `
But I don't want the real and imaginary part for each vale of a specified a, rather I would like to have a plot that is a continuous function of a, and the maximum of the real part of the z.
Is there any way to do it?
I have tried this,
Plot[Max[Re[z]] /. ToRules[roots[a_]], a, 1, 2,
PlotLabel -> PlotStyle -> Red, AspectRatio -> 1]
but it has been running for a day and I still have not got any result.
plotting equation-solving complex
New contributor
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that I have this problem
roots =
Reduce[
Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == Cos[z + Cos[z + Cos[z]]] &&
-3 < Re[z] < 3 && -3 < Im[z] < 3, z] // Quiet;
ListPlot[Re[z], Im[z] /. ToRules[roots],
PlotLabel ->
Style[TraditionalForm[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == Cos[z + Cos[z + Cos[z]]]], 14],
PlotStyle -> Red, AspectRatio -> 1]
Thus as in https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/newin7/content/TranscendentalRoots/PlotTheRootsOfANestedTranscendentalEquation.html
I get a beautiful solution. Suppose now that this equation depends on quantity a in a range of (1, 2).
roots[a_] :=
Reduce[
Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == a + a Cos[z + a Cos[z + Cos[z]]] &&
-3 < Re[z] < 3 && -3 < Im[z] < 3, z] // Quiet; `
But I don't want the real and imaginary part for each vale of a specified a, rather I would like to have a plot that is a continuous function of a, and the maximum of the real part of the z.
Is there any way to do it?
I have tried this,
Plot[Max[Re[z]] /. ToRules[roots[a_]], a, 1, 2,
PlotLabel -> PlotStyle -> Red, AspectRatio -> 1]
but it has been running for a day and I still have not got any result.
plotting equation-solving complex
New contributor
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Try discretizing theavalue in the relevant range. If you assume the result to be smooth, you'll get a good approximation.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
May 1 at 16:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that I have this problem
roots =
Reduce[
Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == Cos[z + Cos[z + Cos[z]]] &&
-3 < Re[z] < 3 && -3 < Im[z] < 3, z] // Quiet;
ListPlot[Re[z], Im[z] /. ToRules[roots],
PlotLabel ->
Style[TraditionalForm[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == Cos[z + Cos[z + Cos[z]]]], 14],
PlotStyle -> Red, AspectRatio -> 1]
Thus as in https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/newin7/content/TranscendentalRoots/PlotTheRootsOfANestedTranscendentalEquation.html
I get a beautiful solution. Suppose now that this equation depends on quantity a in a range of (1, 2).
roots[a_] :=
Reduce[
Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == a + a Cos[z + a Cos[z + Cos[z]]] &&
-3 < Re[z] < 3 && -3 < Im[z] < 3, z] // Quiet; `
But I don't want the real and imaginary part for each vale of a specified a, rather I would like to have a plot that is a continuous function of a, and the maximum of the real part of the z.
Is there any way to do it?
I have tried this,
Plot[Max[Re[z]] /. ToRules[roots[a_]], a, 1, 2,
PlotLabel -> PlotStyle -> Red, AspectRatio -> 1]
but it has been running for a day and I still have not got any result.
plotting equation-solving complex
New contributor
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Suppose that I have this problem
roots =
Reduce[
Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == Cos[z + Cos[z + Cos[z]]] &&
-3 < Re[z] < 3 && -3 < Im[z] < 3, z] // Quiet;
ListPlot[Re[z], Im[z] /. ToRules[roots],
PlotLabel ->
Style[TraditionalForm[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == Cos[z + Cos[z + Cos[z]]]], 14],
PlotStyle -> Red, AspectRatio -> 1]
Thus as in https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/newin7/content/TranscendentalRoots/PlotTheRootsOfANestedTranscendentalEquation.html
I get a beautiful solution. Suppose now that this equation depends on quantity a in a range of (1, 2).
roots[a_] :=
Reduce[
Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] == a + a Cos[z + a Cos[z + Cos[z]]] &&
-3 < Re[z] < 3 && -3 < Im[z] < 3, z] // Quiet; `
But I don't want the real and imaginary part for each vale of a specified a, rather I would like to have a plot that is a continuous function of a, and the maximum of the real part of the z.
Is there any way to do it?
I have tried this,
Plot[Max[Re[z]] /. ToRules[roots[a_]], a, 1, 2,
PlotLabel -> PlotStyle -> Red, AspectRatio -> 1]
but it has been running for a day and I still have not got any result.
plotting equation-solving complex
plotting equation-solving complex
New contributor
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited May 1 at 16:41
m_goldberg
89.5k873202
89.5k873202
New contributor
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked May 1 at 14:31
vanessavanessa
204
204
New contributor
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
vanessa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
$begingroup$
Try discretizing theavalue in the relevant range. If you assume the result to be smooth, you'll get a good approximation.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
May 1 at 16:14
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Try discretizing theavalue in the relevant range. If you assume the result to be smooth, you'll get a good approximation.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
May 1 at 16:14
1
1
$begingroup$
Try discretizing the
a value in the relevant range. If you assume the result to be smooth, you'll get a good approximation.$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
May 1 at 16:14
$begingroup$
Try discretizing the
a value in the relevant range. If you assume the result to be smooth, you'll get a good approximation.$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
May 1 at 16:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Clear["Global`*"]
Use a numeric technique, i.e., NSolve.
f[a_?NumericQ] :=
Max@Re[z /.
NSolve[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] ==
a + Cos[z + a*Cos[z + a*Cos[z]]] && -3 < Re[z] < 3 &&
-3 < Im[z] < 3 && 1 <= a <= 2, z]]
Since f uses a numeric technique, its argument is restricted to numeric values by using PatternTest with NumericQ. Even using numeric techniques the calculations are slow.
AbsoluteTiming[data = Table[a, f[a], a, 1, 2, .025];]
(* 803.729, Null *)
ListLinePlot[data,
Frame -> True,
FrameLabel ->
(Style[#, 12, Bold] & /@ "a", "Max[Re[z]]")]

The plot is not smooth so if you were to use Plot its adaptive sampling would further increase the time required.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It took longer for me (2673.97 seconds), but it work! Thank you so much for your clever answer!
$endgroup$
– vanessa
May 1 at 17:57
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
vanessa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197442%2ffinding-the-maximum-real-part-of-roots%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Clear["Global`*"]
Use a numeric technique, i.e., NSolve.
f[a_?NumericQ] :=
Max@Re[z /.
NSolve[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] ==
a + Cos[z + a*Cos[z + a*Cos[z]]] && -3 < Re[z] < 3 &&
-3 < Im[z] < 3 && 1 <= a <= 2, z]]
Since f uses a numeric technique, its argument is restricted to numeric values by using PatternTest with NumericQ. Even using numeric techniques the calculations are slow.
AbsoluteTiming[data = Table[a, f[a], a, 1, 2, .025];]
(* 803.729, Null *)
ListLinePlot[data,
Frame -> True,
FrameLabel ->
(Style[#, 12, Bold] & /@ "a", "Max[Re[z]]")]

The plot is not smooth so if you were to use Plot its adaptive sampling would further increase the time required.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It took longer for me (2673.97 seconds), but it work! Thank you so much for your clever answer!
$endgroup$
– vanessa
May 1 at 17:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Clear["Global`*"]
Use a numeric technique, i.e., NSolve.
f[a_?NumericQ] :=
Max@Re[z /.
NSolve[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] ==
a + Cos[z + a*Cos[z + a*Cos[z]]] && -3 < Re[z] < 3 &&
-3 < Im[z] < 3 && 1 <= a <= 2, z]]
Since f uses a numeric technique, its argument is restricted to numeric values by using PatternTest with NumericQ. Even using numeric techniques the calculations are slow.
AbsoluteTiming[data = Table[a, f[a], a, 1, 2, .025];]
(* 803.729, Null *)
ListLinePlot[data,
Frame -> True,
FrameLabel ->
(Style[#, 12, Bold] & /@ "a", "Max[Re[z]]")]

The plot is not smooth so if you were to use Plot its adaptive sampling would further increase the time required.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It took longer for me (2673.97 seconds), but it work! Thank you so much for your clever answer!
$endgroup$
– vanessa
May 1 at 17:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Clear["Global`*"]
Use a numeric technique, i.e., NSolve.
f[a_?NumericQ] :=
Max@Re[z /.
NSolve[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] ==
a + Cos[z + a*Cos[z + a*Cos[z]]] && -3 < Re[z] < 3 &&
-3 < Im[z] < 3 && 1 <= a <= 2, z]]
Since f uses a numeric technique, its argument is restricted to numeric values by using PatternTest with NumericQ. Even using numeric techniques the calculations are slow.
AbsoluteTiming[data = Table[a, f[a], a, 1, 2, .025];]
(* 803.729, Null *)
ListLinePlot[data,
Frame -> True,
FrameLabel ->
(Style[#, 12, Bold] & /@ "a", "Max[Re[z]]")]

The plot is not smooth so if you were to use Plot its adaptive sampling would further increase the time required.
$endgroup$
Clear["Global`*"]
Use a numeric technique, i.e., NSolve.
f[a_?NumericQ] :=
Max@Re[z /.
NSolve[Sin[z + Sin[z + Sin[z]]] ==
a + Cos[z + a*Cos[z + a*Cos[z]]] && -3 < Re[z] < 3 &&
-3 < Im[z] < 3 && 1 <= a <= 2, z]]
Since f uses a numeric technique, its argument is restricted to numeric values by using PatternTest with NumericQ. Even using numeric techniques the calculations are slow.
AbsoluteTiming[data = Table[a, f[a], a, 1, 2, .025];]
(* 803.729, Null *)
ListLinePlot[data,
Frame -> True,
FrameLabel ->
(Style[#, 12, Bold] & /@ "a", "Max[Re[z]]")]

The plot is not smooth so if you were to use Plot its adaptive sampling would further increase the time required.
answered May 1 at 16:16
Bob HanlonBob Hanlon
62.2k33598
62.2k33598
$begingroup$
It took longer for me (2673.97 seconds), but it work! Thank you so much for your clever answer!
$endgroup$
– vanessa
May 1 at 17:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It took longer for me (2673.97 seconds), but it work! Thank you so much for your clever answer!
$endgroup$
– vanessa
May 1 at 17:57
$begingroup$
It took longer for me (2673.97 seconds), but it work! Thank you so much for your clever answer!
$endgroup$
– vanessa
May 1 at 17:57
$begingroup$
It took longer for me (2673.97 seconds), but it work! Thank you so much for your clever answer!
$endgroup$
– vanessa
May 1 at 17:57
add a comment |
vanessa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
vanessa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
vanessa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
vanessa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197442%2ffinding-the-maximum-real-part-of-roots%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Try discretizing the
avalue in the relevant range. If you assume the result to be smooth, you'll get a good approximation.$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
May 1 at 16:14